|
Status Review for Snake River Sockeye Salmon
Robin S. Waples and Orlay W. JohnsonNational Marine Fisheries ServiceNorthwest Fisheries Science Center Coastal Zone and Estuarine Studies Division 2725 Montlake Blvd. E. Seattle WA 98112
Robert P. Jones, Jr.
National Marine Fisheries Service
April 1991 |
To be considered for protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA), a group of organisms must qualify as a "species" as defined by the ESA. The NMFS Species Definition Paper (Waples 1991) provides a framework for evaluating the petition for Snake River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in this context. However, a lack of key information precludes a definitive determination at critical points of the decision process. This is particularly true for the first key question that must be addressed, Are Snake River sockeye salmon and kokanee distinct gene pools? This question is inherently tied to the question, Are post-Sunbeam Dam sockeye salmon in Redfish Lake direct descendants of the original (pre-1900) sockeye salmon gene pool, or have they recently been produced by the kokanee gene pool? The Biological Review Team unanimously agreed that there is insufficient information at present to determine with any reasonable degree of certainty the origin of the current sockeye salmon gene pool. After some discussion, the team reached a strong consensus that, in this instance, our obligation as stewards of the resource requires us to proceed under the assumption that recent sockeye salmon in Redfish Lake are descended from the original sockeye salmon gene pool. Therefore, as stipulated in the Species Definition Paper, the anadromous (sockeye salmon) component of O. nerka was considered separately from the nonanadromous (kokanee) component in determining whether an ESA listing is warranted.
Available information indicates that Snake River sockeye salmon meet both of the criteria necessary to be considered a "species" under the ESA: They are reproductively isolated from other sockeye salmon populations, and they represent an important component in the evolutionary legacy of the biological species. Given the extremely low numbers in the remaining population, the threshold question is not really an issue. Therefore, the decision to treat Redfish Lake sockeye salmon as distinct from kokanee leads to a recommendation by the NMFS Biological Review Team to list the "species" as endangered. Although no adult sockeye salmon were observed in Redfish Lake in 1990, a declaration of extinction would be premature because other year classes may return through at least 1993. Research opportunities for 1991 may provide information pertinent to this petition. If further research indicates that Redfish Lake sockeye salmon and kokanee are not reproductively isolated (and therefore should be considered as a unit for ESA purposes), additional information will need to be developed to determine whether the combined unit is a "species" and, if so, whether it is threatened or endangered.
The status review for Snake River sockeye salmon was conducted by the NMFS Northwest Region Biological Review Team (BRT). The extensive public record developed pursuant to this petition and discussions of that record by the ESA Technical Committee formed the basis for the review. Members of the BRT for sockeye salmon were: David Damkaer, Thomas Flagg, Elizabeth Garr, Orlay Johnson, Robert Jones, Conrad Mahnken, Gene Matthews, Gerald Monan, Michael Schiewe, Merritt Tuttle, Robin Waples, John Williams, and Gary Winans.
Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) are native to the Snake River and historically were abundant in several lake systems in Idaho and Oregon. In this century, a variety of factors (including overfishing, irrigation diversions, obstacles to migrating fish, and eradication through poisoning) have led to the demise of all Snake River sockeye salmon except those returning to Redfish Lake in the Stanley Basin of Idaho. Following recent declines in that population as well, the Shoshone-Bannock tribe of Idaho petitioned the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to list Snake River sockeye salmon as an endangered "species" under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). To determine whether such an action was warranted, NMFS formed a Biological Review Team to review the status of Snake River sockeye salmon. This document reports the results of that status review and summarizes recommendations of the Biological Review Team regarding the ESA petition.
It has been suggested that a full status review of Snake River sockeye salmon is not appropriate because the population is functionally extinct. The fact that no adult sockeye salmon were observed in Redfish Lake in 1990 lends support to this view. However, there is no provision in the ESA for declaring a "species" extinct until the last individual perishes. Redds (nests) of adult sockeye salmon were observed in Redfish Lake in 1988 and 1989 (Hall-Griswold 1990). Assuming a predominantly 4-year life cycle [typical for Redfish Lake sockeye salmon in the past (Bjornn et al. 1968)], adult returns may occur through at least 1993. Thus, although adult returns for the past 3 years have been minimal, we cannot make a determination that anadromous O. nerka are extinct in the Snake River. However,
if no adults return through fall 1994 (allowing for the possibility of some 5-year-old spawners), then such a determination would probably be warranted.
Two key questions must be addressed in determining whether a listing under the Endangered Species Act is appropriate:
The ESA of 1973, as amended in 1978, allows listing of "distinct population segments" of vertebrates as well as named species and subspecies. The Species Definition Paper for Pacific salmon (Waples 1991) stipulates that a salmon population will be considered "distinct" for purposes of the ESA if it represents an evolutionarily significant unit (ESU) of the biological species. A population (or group of populations) can be considered an ESU if it a) is reproductively isolated from other conspecific populations and b) represents an important component in the evolutionary legacy of the biological species.
For the sockeye salmon petition, the question of population distinctness is complicated by the presence in Redfish Lake of two forms of O. nerka (sockeye salmon and kokanee). The Species Definition Paper states that if both anadromous and nonanadromous forms occur together, it first must be determined whether the two forms share a common gene pool. If so, they should be considered as a unit in ESA evaluations; if the two forms are reproductively isolated, they should be considered separately. Application of the framework in the paper suggests the decision tree for the sockeye salmon petition shown in Figure 1.
The Biological Review Team concluded it is likely (but has not been conclusively established) that prior to 1900, sockeye salmon in Redfish Lake were reproductively isolated from kokanee.
The present day relationship between sockeye salmon and kokanee in Redfish Lake is uncertain. No sockeye salmon were available for genetic or other analyses to compare with the kokanee that were sampled in the fall of 1990. Recent sockeye salmon in Redfish Lake may be descended directly from the pre-1900 sockeye salmon gene pool. Alternatively, Sunbeam Dam may have caused extinction of the original gene pool, and recent sockeye salmon in the Stanley Basin may be due to strays or transplants, or they may represent an anadromous form recently derived from the kokanee gene pool. Facts regarding Sunbeam Dam:
Post-Sunbeam Dam sockeye salmon
A number of hypotheses have been suggested to explain post-Sunbeam Dam sockeye salmon in Redfish Lake. It was apparent from discussions in meetings of the ESA Technical Committee that there is a diversity of opinion on this subject in the scientific community. Arguments for and against each of the hypotheses can be summarized as follows:
These six hypotheses suggest three general scenarios for post-Sunbeam Dam sockeye salmon in Redfish Lake: Scenario A--the original sockeye salmon gene pool persisted (Hypotheses 1 and/or 2); Scenario B--the sockeye salmon came from somewhere else (Hypotheses 3 and/or 4); and Scenario C--recent anadromous fish are derived from the kokanee gene pool, either directly or through hybridization (Hypotheses 5 and/or 6). We rejected Scenario B because Hypothesis 3 (straying) was considered implausible given the distance from possible seed populations, and there seems to be no evidence to support Hypothesis 4 (stock transfer). Arguments can also be made against each of the remaining hypotheses; however, the post-Sunbeam Dam existence of an anadromous run of O. nerka in Redfish Lake is not in doubt, so they must have come from somewhere. In the judgment of the Biological Review Team, Hypotheses 1 (limited passage) and 5 (seaward drift of kokanee) were considered the most likely, but we could not completely rule out Hypotheses 2 (spawning below the dam) or 6 (hybridization of sockeye salmon and kokanee) as possible sources for the post-Sunbeam Dam sockeye salmon. The team unanimously agreed that there is insufficient information at present to determine with any reasonable degree of certainty which (or what combination) of these events actually occurred.
The Biological Review Team thus faced a difficult problem: a decision whether the sockeye salmon petition is warranted is required by law by April 1991, but there is insufficient information for a definitive determination of the first key question in the process. After a lengthy discussion, the team reached a strong consensus that, because we cannot conclude with any certainty that the original sockeye salmon gene pool is extinct, as stewards of the resource we are obliged to make a conservative decision in this circumstance. The team was not unmindful of the implications of this decision, and we do not suggest that a lack of information should always result in a conservative decision in ESA evaluations. However, a factor that weighed heavily in these considerations was the irreversibility of the likely consequences of taking the alternative course. That is, if we were to assume that recent anadromous O. nerka in Redfish Lake were derived from kokanee and this assumption proved wrong, the original sockeye salmon gene pool could easily become extinct before the mistake was realized.
An affirmative answer to the question, Are Snake River sockeye salmon and kokanee separate gene pools? places us on the left branch of the decision tree. Focus is now on the sockeye salmon gene pool, and in particular on the question, Are Snake River sockeye salmon an ESU? The NMFS Species Definition Paper (Waples 1991) provides two criteria that must be met if a population is to be considered an ESU (and hence a "species" as defined by the ESA). Information relevant to these criteria can be summarized as follows:
A. Reproductive isolation
B. Evolutionary significance
These data suggest that sockeye salmon from Redfish Lake are genetically distinct from other sockeye salmon populations.
Because of the uncertainty regarding the origin of recent anadromous O. nerka in Redfish Lake, we also considered the implications of following the right branch of the decision tree (sockeye salmon and kokanee share a common gene pool) under the assumption that Hypotheses 5 or 6 are correct. Under this assumption, the two forms (sockeye salmon and kokanee) should be considered as a unit, and the relevant question becomes, Are Snake River sockeye salmon/kokanee an ESU? The following data are germane to this question:
The genetic distinctness of kokanee from the two Stanley Basin lakes suggests a strong degree of reproductive isolation from other kokanee populations. A determination regarding evolutionary significance with respect to other O. nerka populations would require a more detailed study, but it seems reasonable that if we assume Redfish Lake sockeye salmon/kokanee are essentially a single gene pool, then they may represent an ESU (or part of an ESU comprising, perhaps, the Stanley Basin lakes). Is such an ESU threatened or endangered? Considering only abundance, the answer is probably not. The most recent abundance estimate for Redfish Lake kokanee is about 25,000 fish of all ages. This estimate, however, has a large variance, and the kokanee population may be vulnerable if predatory species are introduced for sport fisheries (Bowler 1990).
For anadromous/nonanadromous units, however, the threshold question is somewhat more complex. Following the guidelines of the Species Definition Paper, we must consider whether loss of a trait (e.g., anadromy or nonanadromy) would compromise the genetic characteristics of the population that make it an ESU.
Specifically, in the present case, would extinction of the anadromous form represent an evolutionarily important loss to the "species"?
Several outcomes are possible. If Redfish Lake sockeye salmon/kokanee were determined to be an ESU primarily on the basis of characteristics of the kokanee form, and this determination did not depend on the existence of an anadromous form of O. nerka, then the potential loss of the anadromous form would probably not constitute a threat to the ESU. However, if Redfish Lake sockeye salmon/kokanee were determined to be distinct solely (or primarily) because of the presence of the anadromous form, then potential loss of a trait that makes a population "distinct" (i.e., a "species" under the ESA) should be a legitimate ESA concern.
Again, there is not enough scientific information for a definitive determination of this issue. A trait that is important in an evolutionary sense must have a genetic basis. It seems likely that there is some genetic basis for anadromous behavior in kokanee, but this has not been clearly demonstrated. Expression of the trait seems to be controlled at least in part by environmental factors. Assuming the phenomenon does have a genetic basis, it is not clear whether the trait would be lost if no anadromous fish were to return, and if so how quickly it might be lost. Foerster (1947) showed that kokanee from Kootenay Lake retained the ability to migrate to sea and return as adults (albeit in small numbers) when forced to do so, in spite of being landlocked for thousands of years. On the other hand, it has been suggested that kokanee in Wallowa Lake in Oregon (a Snake River drainage) may have lost the ability to produce truly anadromous fish within about 20 years of the erection of barriers to adult returns (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 1990).
In principle, these questions are amenable to scientific study. In practice, a substantial research effort would probably be required for a minimum of 5-10 years before any meaningful results could be anticipated.
If Snake River sockeye salmon are an ESU, a decision to list as endangered seems inescapable given the records of few remaining fish. As noted above, an extinction determination would be premature at this time.
The following research activities may help to formulate a recovery plan (if necessary) and may provide answers to some of the important questions relating to this petition.
- A. Juveniles outmigrating from Redfish Lake (April-May)
- 1) Use PIT tags to study time of downstream arrival at dams.
- 2) Perform genetic analyses for comparison with Redfish Lake kokanee sampled in 1990.
- B. Adults returning to Redfish Lake (July-September)
- 1) Hold in net-pens until spawning (October).
- 2) Perform genetic analyses on carcasses after spawning.
- 3) Use part of progeny from spawnings in captive brood-stock program; remainder would be released into the wild.
- 4) Cryopreserve male gametes for use in future years.
The PIT-tag study may yield information that will allow effective use of protective measures. Genetic analysis of outmigrating O. nerka may show they are distinct from the resident kokanee, lending strong support to the hypothesis that another gene pool (presumably the ancestral sockeye salmon gene pool) persists in Redfish Lake. Inability to find genetic differences between 1991 outmigrants and kokanee sampled from the spawning grounds in 1990 would be consistent with the hypothesis that anadromous fish have been produced by the kokanee population. However, such a result would also be consistent with the hypothesis that no sockeye salmon outmigrated in 1991 but some remain at sea and may return through 1993. That is, fish outmigrating in 1991 might be kokanee that would never return as adults [as apparently occurs, for example, at Dworshak Reservoir (Bowler 1990)].
If an adequate number of returning adults are sampled without finding any appreciable differences from Redfish Lake kokanee, an answer of "not reproductively isolated" to the first key question is probably warranted, indicating that the right branch of the decision tree should be followed. This conclusion is based on the observation that sympatric sockeye salmon and kokanee can be quite different genetically, so we would expect to find genetic differences if the original sockeye salmon gene pool still exists.
Implementation of the suggested research plans is contingent on several factors. All field work must be coordinated with the appropriate state and federal agencies, and necessary permits must be obtained. Careful consideration should be given to the risks of handling juvenile and adult fish and the consequences of removing a sample of 50-100 juvenile outmigrants for genetic analysis. The benefits and risks of a captive brood-stock program should be discussed and carefully considered. Finally, funds to conduct the research, including personnel to staff the collecting weirs over extended periods of time, must be made available.
Bailey, R. G. 1980. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric., Miscl. Publ. 1391, 77 p.
Bjornn, T. C., D. R. Craddock, and D. R. Corley. 1968. Migration and survival of Redfish Lake, Idaho, sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 97:360-373.
Bowler, B. 1990. Additional information on the status of Snake River sockeye salmon. Report submitted to ESA Administrative Record for sockeye salmon, December 1990, 23 p. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 600 S. Walnut St., Boise, ID 83707.
Chapman, D. W., W. S. Platts, D. Park, and M. Hill. 1990. Status of Snake River sockeye salmon. Final report, 90 p. Available Pacific Northwest Utilities Conference Committee, 101 SW Main Street, Suite 810, Portland, OR 97204.
Evermann, B. W. 1896. A report upon salmon investigations in the headwaters of the Columbia River in the state of Idaho, in 1895. Bull. U.S. Fish Commission 16:151-202.
Foerster, R. E. 1947. Experiments to develop sea-run from land-locked sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka kennerlyi). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 7:88-93.
Foerster, R. E. 1968. The sockeye salmon. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 162, 422 p.
Foote, C. J. 1987. An experimental examination of behavioural isolation between sockeye salmon and kokanee, the anadromous and nonanadromous forms of Oncorhynchus nerka. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Foote, C. J., and P. A. Larkin. 1988. The role of male choice in the assortative mating of sockeye salmon and kokanee, the anadromous and nonanadromous forms of Oncorhynchus nerka. Behaviour 106:43-62.
Foote, C. J., C. C. Wood, W. C. Clarke, and J. Blackburn. 1989a. The saltwater adaptability of sympatric anadromous and non-anadromous sockeye salmon and their 'hybrids.' Aquaculture 82:377 (abstract).
Foote, C. J., C. C. Wood, and R. E. Withler. 1989b. Biochemical genetic comparison of sockeye salmon and kokanee, the anadromous and nonanadromous forms of Oncorhynchus nerka. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46:149-158.
Hall-Griswold, J. A. 1990. Sockeye of Stanley Basin--Summary. Report submitted to the ESA Administrative Record for sockeye salmon, July 1990, 29 p. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 600 S. Walnut St., Boise, ID 83707.
Hanson, A. J., and H. D. Smith. 1967. Mate selection in a population of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) of mixed age groups. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 24:1955-1977.
Jones, R. 1991. The effect of Sunbeam Dam on sockeye salmon in the Salmon River, Idaho. Memo to ESA Administrative Record for sockeye salmon, March 1991, 6 p. Available Environmental and Technical Services Division, NMFS, Portland, OR 97232.
McCart, P. 1970. A polymorphic population of Oncorhynchus nerka in Babine Lake, British Columbia. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Monan, G. 1991. Genetic analysis of O. nerka. Memo to Merritt Tuttle for inclusion in ESA Administrative Record for sockeye salmon, February 1991, 8 p. Available Environmental and Technical Services Division, NMFS, Portland, OR 97232.
Mullan, J. W. 1986. Determinants of sockeye salmon abundance in the Columbia River, 1880-1982: A review and synthesis. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 86(12):1-136.
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 1990. Snake River sockeye--Stock status review information. Report submitted to ESA Administrative Record for sockeye salmon, August 1990, 6 p. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, P. O. Box 59, Portland, OR 97207.
Parkhurst, S. 1950. Survey of the Columbia River and it tributaries--Part VII. Snake River from above the Grande Ronde River through the Payette River. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Spec. Rep. Fish. 40, 95 p.
Pearson, J. A. 1921. Report on fishways and fish screens. Eighth Biennial Rep. Fish and Game Warden Idaho, p. 45-58.
Ricker, W. E. 1940. On the origin of kokanee, a fresh-water type of sockeye salmon. Trans. R. Soc. Can. 34:121-135.
Skaala, O., and G. Naevdal. 1989. Genetic differentiation between freshwater resident and anadromous brown trout, Salmo trutta, within watercourses. J. Fish. Biol. 34:597-605.
Utter, F., P. Aebersold, J. Helle, and G. Winans. 1984. Genetic characterization of populations in the southeastern range of sockeye salmon. In J. M. Walton and D. B. Houston (editors), Proceedings of the Olympic wild fish conference, March 23-25, 1983, Port Angeles, WA, p. 17-32. Fisheries Technology Program, Peninsula College, Port Angeles, WA. 98362.
Vuorinen, J., and O. K. Berg. 1989. Genetic divergence of anadromous and nonanadromous Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the River Namsen, Norway. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46:406-409.
Waples, R. S. 1991. Definition of "species" under the Endangered Species Act: Application to Pacific salmon. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS F/NWC-194, 29 p.
Wood, C. C., and C. J. Foote. 1990. Genetic differences in the early development and growth of sympatric sockeye salmon and kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) and their hybrids. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47:2250-2260.