[Senate Report 111-226]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Calendar No. 469
111th Congress Report
SENATE
2d Session 111-226
======================================================================
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES
APPROPRIATION BILL, 2011
_______
July 19, 2010.--Ordered to be printed
_______
Mr. Johnson, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following
REPORT
[To accompany S. 3615]
The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 3615)
making appropriations for military construction, the Department
of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2011, and for other purposes, reports
favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass.
Amounts in new budget authority
Total of fiscal year 2011 bill as reported to the Senate$143,530,131,000
Total of fiscal year 2012 advance appropriations
included in this bill............................... 50,610,985,000
Amount of 2010 appropriations........................... 182,750,300,000
Amount of 2011 budget estimate.......................... 143,531,666,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
Amount of 2010 appropriations....................... -39,220,169,000
Amount of 2011 budget estimate...................... -1,535,000
CONTENTS
----------
Page
Background:
Purpose of the Bill.......................................... 4
Committee Recommendation..................................... 4
Overview and Summary of the Bill............................. 4
Military Construction: Investing in Infrastructure for Our
Troops and Their Families.................................. 5
Department of Veterans Affairs: Transfomation to a 21st
Century Department......................................... 6
Title I:
Military Construction:
Items of Special Interest:
Hearings............................................. 7
Summary of Committee Recommendations................. 7
Reprogramming Guidelines............................. 7
Real Property Maintenance............................ 7
Incremental Funding.................................. 7
Global Challenges.................................... 7
Military Construction, Army.............................. 16
Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps............. 17
Military Construction, Air Force......................... 18
Military Construction, Defense-Wide...................... 19
Military Construction, Reserve Components................ 22
North Atlantic Treaty Organization....................... 25
Family Housing Overview.................................. 26
Family Housing Construction, Army........................ 26
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Army........... 27
Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps....... 27
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Navy and Marine
Corps.................................................. 29
Family Housing Construction, Air Force................... 29
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Air Force...... 30
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide... 30
Family Housing Improvement Fund.......................... 31
Homeowners Assistance Fund............................... 31
Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense-Wide..... 32
Base Closure Account 1990................................ 33
Base Closure Account 2005................................ 33
Administrative Provisions................................ 37
Title II:
Department of Veterans Affairs:
Items of Special Interest:
Hearings............................................. 39
Summary of Committee Recommendation.................. 39
Department Overview.................................. 39
Veterans Benefits Administration......................... 40
Compensation and Pensions............................ 41
Readjustment Benefits................................ 42
Veterans Insurance and Indemnities................... 42
Veterans Housing Benefit Program Fund................ 43
Vocational Rehabilitation Loans Program Account...... 44
Native American Veteran Housing Loan Program Account. 44
Veterans Health Administration........................... 44
Medical Services..................................... 47
Medical Support and Compliance....................... 51
Medical Facilities................................... 52
Medical and Prosthetic Research...................... 53
Medical Care Cost Recovery Collections............... 54
Medical Care Collection Fund--Revenues Applied....... 54
National Cemetery Administration......................... 55
Departmental Administration.............................. 55
General Operating Expenses, Veterans Benefits
Administration..................................... 56
General Administration............................... 58
Information Technology Systems....................... 61
Office of Inspector General.......................... 61
Construction, Major Projects......................... 63
Construction, Minor Projects......................... 65
Grants for Construction of State Extended Care
Facilities......................................... 66
Grants for Construction of State Veterans Cemeteries. 67
Administrative Provisions............................ 68
Title III:
Related Agencies:
American Battle Monuments Commission:
Salaries and Expenses................................ 70
Foreign Currency Fluctuations........................ 70
U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims: Salaries and
Expenses............................................... 71
Department of Defense--Civil: Cemeterial Expenses, Army:
Salaries and Expenses.................................. 71
Armed Forces Retirement Home............................. 73
Title IV:
Overseas Contingency Operations:
Military Construction, Army.............................. 74
Military Construction, Air Force......................... 75
Military Construction, Defense-Wide...................... 75
Title V: General Provisions...................................... 76
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of
the Sen-
ate............................................................ 77
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules
of the Senate.................................................. 78
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 78
Budgetary Impact of Bill......................................... 79
Military Construction Project Listing by Location................ 80
Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Items............ 107
BACKGROUND
Purpose of the Bill
The Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related
Agencies appropriations bill provides necessary funding for the
planning, design, construction, alteration, and improvement of
military facilities worldwide, for both active and reserve
forces. It also finances the cost of military family housing
and the U.S. share of the NATO Security Investment Program. In
addition, the bill provides funding to implement base closures
and realignments authorized by law. The bill provides resources
to the Department of Veterans Affairs for veterans benefits and
healthcare and funding for U.S. cemeteries and battlefield
monuments both in the United States and abroad, including
Arlington National Cemetery; the U.S. Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims; and Armed Forces Retirement Homes. The bill
also provides funding for Overseas Contingency Operations
military construction and advance appropriations for veterans
medical services.
Committee Recommendation
The Committee recommends appropriations totaling
$143,530,131,000 for fiscal year 2011 military construction,
family housing, base closure, veterans healthcare and benefits,
fiscal year 2012 advance appropriations for veterans medical
care, related agencies, and overseas contingency operations.
This includes $63,849,146,000 in mandatory funding and
$79,680,985,000 in discretionary funding. The table at the end
of the report displays the Committee recommendation in
comparison with the current fiscal year, and the President's
fiscal year 2011 request.
Overview and Summary of Bill
The Military Construction, and Veterans Affairs and Related
Agencies appropriations bill funds an array of programs that
are vital to America's military personnel and their families,
and to the Nations' veterans. For U.S. military forces and
their families worldwide, the bill funds critical
infrastructure, ranging from mission essential operational and
training facilities to key quality of life facilities,
including barracks, family housing, child care centers, schools
and hospitals. For America's 23,100,000 veterans, the bill
provides the necessary funding for veterans benefits and
healthcare, from prescription drugs and clinical services to
the construction of hospitals and other medical facilities
throughout the Nation. The bill also provides funds for U.S.
cemeteries and monuments both in the United States and
overseas, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, the
Armed Forces Retirement Homes, and military construction for
Overseas Contingency Operations.
Military Construction: Investing in Infrastructure for Our Troops and
Their Families
Infrastructure provides the framework to support America's
military forces and military families at home and overseas. New
missions to meet 21st century threats, major base realignments
and stationing shifts worldwide, significant increases in Army
and Marine Corps troop strength, and the spike in expeditionary
facilities needed to support combat forces in Afghanistan have
brought a surge of military construction demands in recent
years. At the same time, the military continues to be
confronted with the need to replace aging infrastructure and
provide quality housing and community support facilities for
military troops and their families. It is imperative that the
infrastructure needs of our troops and their families continue
to keep pace with the persistent demand for new facilities--
whether it is a need for an elementary school in North Carolina
or a barracks requirement in Afghanistan.
Over the past several years, the annual budget requests for
military construction have rocketed due to the demand for
additional facilities needed to support the BRAC 2005 program
and the increase in end strength of the Army and Marine Corps.
Due largely to the conclusion of BRAC 2005 construction funding
in fiscal year 2011, the military construction budget request
has dropped $4,532,582,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted
level. With the spotlight again on the regular military
construction program, the Committee is concerned that current
mission requirements will continue to compete with emerging
mission requirements for a smaller pool of available funding,
and that efforts to replace aging infrastructure may lose out
in the competition for funds. This scenario is particularly
relevant in the case of the Air Force Reserve, whose budget
request included only one military construction project. During
the budget roll-out, it was acknowledged that the Air Force
Reserve had fewer ``new mission'' requirements, leaving the
Reserve component on the losing end of the resource allocation.
These actions will continue if hard decisions are not made to
identify and fund the critical infrastructure needs to support
operational activities--whether those activities are new or
old. Also stressing the regular military construction budget is
the growing demand for infrastructure investment to support
major installation realignments overseas in the European and
Pacific theaters. Adequate planning and oversight from the
Department is essential to manage these competing priorities in
a time of budgetary restraint.
Because of the ongoing constraints on the regular military
construction budget, the Committee has continued its practice
of providing additional funding, where indicated, to supplement
the President's budget request, with particular emphasis on
mission critical and quality of life facilities. The Committee
has vetted each of the military construction projects included
in the Committee recommendation with the services and defense
agencies to ensure that every project is a priority of the base
commander, meets a military requirement, and is executable.
Because the military construction accounts are project based,
with funding earmarked by the President for specific projects,
the additional funding provided by the Committee is also
project specific. All major construction projects funded
through the military construction appropriations accounts are
included in the President's budget request or the services'
Future Years Defense Programs [FYDPs] and are consistent with
the criteria for additional funding for military construction
projects in section 2856 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103-337). Each of the
major construction projects added to this bill is authorized in
the Committee reported version of the Senate National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.
Department of Veterans Affairs: Transformation to a 21st Century
Department
Today's VA is at a crossroads. With aging infrastructure
and technology, pressing needs of an aging veteran population,
and new combat veterans entering the system, the Department
cannot afford to continue to do business in the same manner it
has. The Secretary has made transforming the VA into a 21st
century organization dedicated to veteran-centric processes his
top priority. This includes harnessing technology to move the
Veterans Benefits Administration from a paper driven, highly
manual process to one that empowers veterans by utilizing
computer-based technology. Similarly, the Veterans Health
Administration must continue to recapitalize aging
infrastructure and pave the way in its use of technology to
deliver high-quality medical care. Today's medical treatment
requires state-of-the-art hospitals and modern, efficient, and
reliable technology. The VA is facing numerous challenges over
the next decade, but the Committee is dedicated to providing
the VA with the resources it needs to meet these challenges and
transform into a 21st century organization.
TITLE I
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
Items of Special Interest
HEARINGS
The Subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans
Affairs and Related Agencies held two hearings related to the
fiscal year 2011 military construction budget request.
Witnesses included representatives of the Office of Secretary
of Defense and of the active and reserve components of the
Army, Navy and Air Force.
SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
The fiscal year 2011 budget request for military
construction and family housing totals $18,747,368,000. The
request reflects a decrease of $4,532,582,000 from the fiscal
year 2010 enacted level. In addition to the military
construction and family housing request, the President's budget
request for fiscal year 2011 includes $1,257,002,000 for
overseas contingency operations. This request is reflected in
title IV of the bill and report.
For title I, the Committee recommends $18,747,368,000,
equal to the budget request for military construction and
family housing.
REPROGRAMMING GUIDELINES
The following reprogramming guidelines apply for all
military construction and family housing projects. A project or
account (including the sub-elements of an account) which has
been specifically reduced by the Congress in acting on the
budget request is considered to be a congressional interest
item and as such, prior approval is required. Accordingly, no
reprogrammings to an item specifically reduced below the
threshold by the Congress are permitted.
The reprogramming criteria that apply to military
construction projects (25 percent of the funded amount or
$2,000,000, whichever is less) continue to apply to new housing
construction projects and to improvements over $2,000,000. To
provide the services the flexibility to proceed with
construction contracts without disruption or delay, the costs
associated with environmental hazard remediation such as
asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based paint removal or
abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard
remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation
requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the time of
the budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects
authorized in this budget year, as well as projects authorized
in prior years for which construction has not been completed.
Furthermore, in instances where prior approval to a
reprogramming request for a project or account has been
received from the Committee, the adjusted amount approved
becomes the new base for any future increase or decrease via
below-threshold reprogrammings (provided that the project or
account is not a congressional interest item as defined above).
In addition to these guidelines, the services are directed
to adhere to the guidance for military construction
reprogrammings and notifications, including the pertinent
statutory authorities contained in DOD Financial Management
Regulation 7000.14-R and relevant updates and policy memoranda.
REAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
The Committee recommends a continuation of the following
general rules for repairing a facility under ``Operation and
Maintenance'' account funding:
--Components of the facility may be repaired by replacement,
and such replacement may be up to current standards or
code.
--Interior arrangements and restorations may be included as
repair, but additions, new facilities, and functional
conversions must be performed as military construction
projects.
--Such projects may be done concurrent with repair projects,
as long as the final conjunctively funded project is a
complete and usable facility.
--The appropriate Service Secretary shall submit a 21-day
notification prior to carrying out any repair project
with an estimated cost in excess of $7,500,000.
The Department is directed to continue to report on the
real property maintenance backlog at all installations for
which there is a requested construction project in future
budget requests. This information is to be provided on the Form
1390. In addition, for all troop housing requests, the Form
1391 is to continue to show all real property maintenance
conducted in the past 2 years and all future requirements for
unaccompanied housing at that installation.
INCREMENTAL FUNDING
In general, the Committee supports full funding for
military construction projects. However, it continues to be the
practice of the Committee to provide incremental funding for
certain large projects, despite administration policy to the
contrary, to enable the services to more efficiently allocate
military construction dollars among projects that can be
executed in the year of appropriation. For fiscal year 2011,
the Committee recommends incremental funding for the following
projects: Aviation Task Force Complex, Fort Wainwright, Alaska;
Technical Application Center, Patrick Air Force Base, Florida;
Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility, Wiesbaden Air
Base, Germany; and Ambulatory Care Center, Lackland Air Force
Base, Texas.
GLOBAL CHALLENGES
The Committee remains concerned about the status, scope and
cost of the Defense Department's global basing strategy,
particularly in view of recent challenges facing the planned
relocation of 8,000 U.S. marines from Okinawa to Guam, and
departmental reviews of the current basing strategy in Europe
and elsewhere. In the past year, as a result of the 2010
Quadrennial Defense Review [QDR], the Department has launched
several reviews of its global basing policy, including a
``Front End Assessment'' of global posture and other key
investment areas in an effort to inform the fiscal year 2012 to
2016 budget process.
The Committee welcomes these reviews and encourages the
Department in particular to undertake comprehensive analyses of
current basing plans in the European Command [EUCOM] and
Pacific Command [PACOM], which are among the costliest and most
complicated of the stationing plans now underway. The Committee
also urges the Department to develop a long term mission plan
and funding strategy for the Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of
Africa [CJTF-HOA] in the Africa Command [AFRICOM].
Pending a review of the Department's global basing posture
and other considerations, the Committee recommends deferring
$464,624,000 in funding requested in the fiscal year 2011
budget submission for overseas military construction in
Djibouti, Germany, Guam, Honduras, Japan, and Korea.
EUCOM.--The QDR has already had an impact on the European
basing strategy, delaying a decision to return two Army brigade
combat teams from Germany to the United States that was a key
element of the 2004 global basing plan. According to the QDR,
the Department will retain four brigade combat teams and a
consolidated Army headquarters in Germany pending a review of
the NATO Strategic Concept and an accompanying assessment of
the U.S. defense posture in Europe. The NATO review is
scheduled to be completed by November 2010.
The Army, however, is moving forward with a robust military
construction program in Germany, including $186,000,000 to
support the planned consolidation of its European headquarters
in Wiesbaden. In all, the fiscal year 2011 budget request
includes $371,729,000 for Army military construction and family
housing in Germany.
The Government Accountability Office [GAO] is conducting a
review of the Army's transformation and consolidation of its
forces and infrastructure in Europe. Based on preliminary
information obtained by GAO, and the uncertainty of DOD's
basing strategy in Europe resulting from the recent QDR
decisions, the Committee believes that Army basing in Europe
and the consolidation of the Army's European headquarters at
Wiesbaden should be re-examined in light of the Department's
evolving strategic global posture concept, and that the
Secretary of Defense should conduct a comprehensive review of
alternatives for stationing forces in Europe.
To ensure that all options have been considered and
evaluated, the Committee has included bill language restricting
the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2011 funding for
Army military construction in Germany until the Department has
completed an evaluation of the NATO Strategic Concept Review
and an accompanying U.S. assessment of its defense posture in
Europe, and a ``Front End Assessment'' of the Department's
global posture for the fiscal year 2012 to 2016 program budget
review cycle as directed by the Secretary of Defense in a May
11, 2010, memo to department heads. The Committee has also
conditioned the funding on the submission to the congressional
defense committees of a comprehensive Army basing strategy for
Europe based on those assessments, a project-based cost
estimate and timeline to fully implement the strategy, and a
certification of the requirement identified by the assessments
for each of the Army military construction projects in Germany
funded in the fiscal year 2011 bill.
PACOM.--The Department has several major posture
initiatives underway in the Pacific Command that collectively
represent the largest restructuring and transformation of
military posture in Asia since World War II. These initiatives,
including the transformation of U.S. military forces and tour
normalization in Korea, the Defense Policy Review Initiative
[DPRI] in Japan, and the military buildup in Guam, will require
billions in resource investments over many years if not decades
to complete. These initiatives are complex projects with major
sub-components, and involve the repositioning of the forward
deployed U.S. military force structure, construction of
hundreds of facilities, the movement of tens of thousands of
military personnel and their families, and modifications to
training resources and capacities throughout the Pacific
region. In addition, the major components of each initiative
are in some cases interrelated and interdependent to the extent
that the successful completion of one component depends on the
successful completion of other components of the initiative.
Host nation contributions and host nation-led construction
activities are expected to offset a large portion of the costs
and produce many of the needed facilities, but those expected
contributions and construction programs also cloud the
transparency of the overall cost and schedule of the
initiatives, create some uncertainty as to if and when the host
nation-sponsored construction programs will be completed, and
ultimately the potential financial requirements that the U.S.
Government will be expected to support. These potential
financial commitments span different appropriations, including
military construction, operations and maintenance, and
personnel accounts.
The Guam military buildup is by far the largest of the
PACOM posture initiatives. While supportive of the realignment
of U.S. marines from Okinawa to Guam, the Committee continues
to be concerned about the cost and magnitude of the
construction program, the potential environmental impact on
Guam, and the timeline to complete the realignment.
The DPRI agreement between the United States and Japan is
based on a strategy to consolidate U.S. forces on Japan to
include relinquishing Marine Corps Air Station Futenma and
moving a number of the associated units to Camp Schwab, on the
northern coast of Okinawa. In addition, the agreement includes
the move of 8,000 marines and their estimated 9,000 dependants
to Guam. According to the DPRI agreement, completion of the
move to Guam and consolidation of units to Camp Schwab is
scheduled to be concluded by the fall of 2014. However, given
the delay in initiating the realignment, that deadline will be
difficult, if not impossible, to meet. Recently, the political
tensions on Okinawa regarding the move of U.S. marines to Camp
Schwab proved to be the downfall of the Japanese prime minister
when he failed to develop an alternative plan for the
relocation and complete removal of U.S. forces from Okinawa.
The newly appointed prime minister has faced political protest
from the residents and elected officials in Okinawa for
acknowledging that the current agreement must go forward.
However, Japan's ruling party suffered heavy losses in recent
parliamentary elections, due largely to economic concerns,
which could weaken its ability to govern, and the Okinawa
gubernatorial election scheduled for November could further
cloud the future of the realignment process. As part of the
move to Schwab, the Japanese have agreed to construct a new
runway, also known as the Futenma Replacement Facility [FRF],
along the coast of Henoko. The site, however, is currently
underwater. The Japanese plan calls for the reclamation of land
via landfill to build the new airstrip. In order to proceed
with the airfield, the Governor of Okinawa must sign a landfill
agreement. According to the DPRI, the United States will only
take action to move the marines to Guam upon tangible progress
being made to replace Futenma. The Department of Defense views
the signing of the landfill agreement, which it considers
tangible progress toward the completion of the FRF, as the
linchpin for entire plan. The landfill permit was originally
expected to be issued in August, but according the Defense
Department officials, the permit will likely be delayed until
after the gubernatorial election in November, and could be
delayed into 2011.
Additional challenges exist on Guam relative to the move.
The Committee continues to be concerned about the impact that
the massive amount of planned construction will have on the
already inadequate water, electrical, road, and wastewater
infrastructure on the island. In addition, in June 2009, GAO
reported that Guam's existing utility infrastructure is not
sufficient to meet DOD's projected utility requirements without
further upgrades. While funding and planning for the military
portion of the buildup has been programmed, there continues to
be a lack of funding resources to address these deficiencies in
the civilian arena. The Committee's concerns were echoed by the
Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] when its review of the
draft environmental impact statement [DEIS] was released in
February. The EPA rated the Navy's plan as ``environmentally
unsatisfactory.'' The EPA also pointed out the negative impacts
that will result with the buildup, specifically the impact
dredging will have on the coral reef at Apra Harbor, and the
increase in pollution levels on the island, most notably the
increase in runoff from the multiple construction projects. The
Navy has indicated that it is working with the EPA to address
and mitigate EPA's concerns before issuing the final EIS. Only
after the EIS has been completed can the Navy sign the Record
of Decision [ROD], which would potentially allow construction
to begin, subject to possible legal challenges.
To date, Congress has appropriated $363,800,000 for the
Guam move while the Government of Japan has contributed
$336,000,000. It is expected that the Japanese government will
provide an additional $497,900,000, approved by the parliament
earlier this year, in the near future. The President's fiscal
year 2011 budget request for the Guam buildup is $452,200,000.
However, of the $1,197,000,000 in United States and Japanese
funding appropriated or approved for appropriation through
fiscal year 2010, only $50,900,000 for planning and design has
been obligated. No military construction can be initiated until
the ROD is signed, and therefore none of the $300,200,000 in
U.S. funding already appropriated for military construction has
been obligated or expended. In light of the current delay in
the obligation of previously appropriated funds for the Guam
buildup, the Committee believes that providing additional
funding in fiscal year 2011 for several of the requested
projects is premature. For example, although the budget request
includes $172,900,000 for the second increment of the North
Ramp utilities and parking projects at Andersen Air Force Base,
the Committee notes that $110,300,000 in U.S. funding was
appropriated for the first increment of those projects in
fiscal year 2010 and has yet to be obligated. In addition, the
Government of Japan provided $27,000,000 for the projects in
fiscal year 2009, which also has not been obligated.
Additionally, the budget request includes $147,200,000 for site
preparation and utilities for the new marine cantonment area at
South Finegayan. The Government of Japan provided $124,800,000
for the project in fiscal year 2009. However, additional land
is still required to complete the overall Finegayan
construction plan. Based on these concerns, the Committee has
deferred funding for the follow on increments of the North Ramp
projects at Anderson and the utilities project at Finegayan.
To address the environmental and utility infrastructure
needs ``outside the gate'' that are not under the direct
auspices of the Navy, the Committee directs the Department of
Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees, with
the fiscal year 2012 budget request, a report outlining the
non-military infrastructure projects needed to support the
temporary influx of workers and the permanent addition of
military personnel and dependants on Guam, detailing the cost
by project, the funding source for each project, and the
planned timetable for each project.
The Committee is equally concerned about the potential
impact of the Korea Transformation Plan, which includes the
consolidation of U.S. forces south of Seoul, the relocation of
U.S. Forces Korea [USFK] headquarters from Yongson to Camp
Humphries, and the ``tour normalization'' plan to transition
U.S. military deployments to Korea from 1-year unaccompanied
tours to 3-year accompanied tours. According to testimony
provided by the Commander, U.S. Forces Korea, and information
provided through a Committee-sponsored GAO review of the U.S.
global posture in Asia, USFK officials have estimated that the
end-state expectation of tour normalization is that the 28,500
troops currently serving in Korea will be joined by 41,500
dependents, and 14,200 non-military personnel and their
dependents, which would result in a need to support a total DOD
population in Korea of approximately 84,000. Tour normalization
is a three-phase plan, with the first phase to bring 4,100
families to Korea expected to be completed by the end of 2011.
There is no timeline associated with the remaining two phases.
To support tour normalization, the Army has developed a
type of public/private housing plan, called the Humphries
Housing Opportunity Plan, similar to military housing
privatization in the United States. The Air Force plans to use
military construction for family housing at Osan Air Force
Base. Regardless of the plan, the ultimate cost of providing
military family housing for the number of families expected to
be stationed in Korea by the end of tour normalization is a
major unknown, as is the extent and cost of providing
supporting facilities, such as schools, hospitals, clinics,
child care centers, and commissaries.
The Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining a
strong U.S. military presence in Korea to promote regional
stability and serve as a deterrent to North Korea. The
Committee also recognizes the Department's long-term goal to
phase out unaccompanied tours in Korea. However, the Committee
is concerned that the Department not embark on a piecemeal
approach to tour normalization without having an end-state
master plan and cost estimate for all of the elements of the
initiative, including military construction, family housing,
operations and maintenance, and personnel costs, before
proceeding beyond the initial stage.
In order to provide Congress with comprehensive and routine
information on the status of these major DOD posture
initiatives in a manner that can be used to provide the
appropriate context for budget deliberations and oversight, the
Committee directs the Department to provide detailed annual
updates on the status of posture restructuring initiatives in
Korea, Japan, Guam, and the initiative that will address
training capabilities and capacity in the Pacific region as an
appendix to the annual DOD Global Posture Report.
These initiative status updates should be provided
annually, beginning with the submission of the fiscal year 2012
budget request, until the restructuring initiatives are
complete and/or funding requirements to support them are
satisfied. The initiative status updates should address the
following areas:
--Initiative Description--an overall description of each
initiative, the major components of the initiative, the
relationships between each component and the overall
successful completion of the initiative, a program
baseline that provides an estimated total cost of the
initiative, expected completion date, and the basis for
pursuing the initiative that is clearly linked to
specific DOD strategic goals and objectives defined by
the Secretary of Defense, Military Departments,
Combatant Commander, or Service Component Commands.
--DOD organization responsible for managing and executing the
initiative.
--Schedule Status--a comparison of the current estimated
timeframe to complete the overall initiative and major
components of the initiative with original baseline
estimates and the currently approved schedule. An
explanation of changes in the estimated completion date
or changes in the approved schedule should be provided.
--Facilities Requirements--a comparison of the baseline and
current projected number of facilities required to
provide appropriate work space, housing, and support
services to the population DOD anticipates it will be
supporting, including facilities, family housing,
commissaries/post exchanges, schools, child care,
clinics and hospitals, and any other facility that will
be needed to support the military, civilian employee,
local national employees, contractor, and retiree
population.
--Cost and Funding Status
--Cost Summary--a comparison of the baseline, approved
program, and current estimated costs by
appropriation; expressed in base year and then-year
dollars, addressing all costs associated with
establishing, modifying, and sustaining DOD's
posture under this initiative, including costs such
as the housing allowance provided to military
service members and families that are then paid to
external organizations for housing.
--Funding Summary--a listing of the funding profile, by
appropriation, for the initiative, based on the
current year President's Budget detailing prior
years, current year, future years defense program,
and costs to complete; expressed in then-year
dollars. All funding requirements associated with
the initiative should be addressed, including, but
not limited to military construction, operations
and support, and personnel appropriations
--Initiative Estimate Assumptions--the key assumptions that
drive initiative cost and schedule estimates,
including:
--Population, including the number of military, civilian,
non-DOD personnel, command sponsored families and
dependants, non-command sponsored families and
dependants, and military retirees affected by the
initiative.
--Housing, including the use of public/private partnerships
to provide necessary facilities, percentage of
personnel and dependents expected to reside in base
housing and off the base or installation,
availability of host nation land for construction
of facilities, and the anticipated host nation
funded and/or provided housing construction.
--Cost Estimating, including modeling used to predict
costs, inflation estimates used for then-year
dollar projections, and contracting strategy.
--Financial, including the funding that will be available
and provided by military services and other DOD
agencies affected by the initiative to cover their
respective costs, including the expected overseas
base housing allowance that will be provided to
military families.
--Medical, including extent to which each military base or
installation will have stand-alone medical
treatment facilities, will share medical treatment
facilities or capacity, the services provided
(medical, dental, vision), dates new facilities
will be available for use, ratio of primary care
providers to population, and any other element that
drives the number of medical treatment facilities
and associated infrastructure or personnel required
to support the population.
--Education, including the estimated number of children per
family, student distribution by grade level,
tuition assistance that will be required/provided,
assumptions used to develop related Department of
Defense Education Activity [DODEA] cost factors,
and any other element that drives the number of
schools and associated infrastructure or personnel
required to support the population.
--Support Services, including capacities of commissaries,
exchanges, USO, Red Cross or other support services
or organizations, necessary modifications to their
existing facilities, and sources of funding
necessary to pay for any needed improvements or new
construction.
--Local Community Support, including the extent to which
local business, housing, medical treatment,
education, and other support services will be
available and necessary to support the expected DOD
population.
--Host Nation Agreements, including any specific agreements
with host nations or legal issues that establish or
drive specific timeframes for completion of the
initiative or major components of the initiatives.
AFRICOM.--The Committee understands that Camp Lemonier,
Djibouti, has been identified as an enduring location for the
Africa Command [AFRICOM] by the Secretary of Defense and as
such is eligible for infrastructure improvements to support an
enduring operation. However, the Committee is concerned about
the future role of the Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa
[CJTF-HOA] and its impact on military construction requirements
at Camp Lemonier. CJTF-HOA is the largest tenant at Camp
Lemonier, encompassing about 52 percent of the camp's
personnel. According to DOD guidance, joint task forces are
established to address specific, limited objectives, and are
normally dissolved when their mission has been achieved or is
no longer required. In an April 10, 2010, Government
Accountability Office [GAO] report, ``DOD Needs to Determine
the Future of its Horn of Africa Task Force,'' (GAO-10-504),
GAO noted that AFRICOM ``has not yet made decisions on the
future of the task force--including whether CJTF-HOA should
continue to exist as a joint task force'' and is continuing to
evaluate whether changes are necessary to its mission,
structure, or resources to support AFRICOM's mission of
sustained security engagement in Africa. GAO also noted a
number of challenges facing CJTF-HOA, including sustainable
funding for its activities, African cultural issues, and
interagency collaboration. According to the report, ``the task
force's sustainability is uncertain because AFRICOM, in concert
with the Department of Defense and the Navy, has not developed
options for funding the task force over the long term.'' GAO
concluded that, ``Until AFRICOM takes steps to examine feasible
long-term funding options and develops a solution to increase
the effectiveness and continuity of efforts among CJTF-HOA's
frequently rotating staff, the command cannot ensure that its
task force is supporting U.S. efforts in Africa with the
appropriate resources and trained personnel.''
In response to the issues raised by GAO, the Defense
Department asserted that it has identified a critical need for
the task force and therefore does not need to determine whether
it should be retained. DOD further noted that CJTF-HOA's
mission of countering violent extremism will remain its top
priority for ``years to come,'' and said that the Department is
working with the Navy and the Office of Management and Budget
on long term funding options for the task force and Camp
Lemonier. However, the Department did not establish a timeline
or identify a plan to determine costs and future funding
options for CJTF-HOA. The Committee therefore directs the
Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense
committees, with submission of the fiscal year 2012 budget
request, a comprehensive plan for the future of CJTF-HOA at
Camp Lemonier, including an updated evaluation of its mission,
structure and resources; a future years funding plan, and a
list, by project, of military construction needed to support
the CJTF-HOA presence at Camp Lemonier through 2016.
The Committee notes that the fiscal year 2011 budget
request includes funding for two headquarters at Camp Lemonier,
one for a Camp Lemonier Headquarters Facility and one for a
CJTF-HOA Joint Operations Center and Headquarters. The
Committee believes that it is both unnecessary and duplicative
to build separate headquarters to support both missions on the
same installation, not only in light of the uncertainty
surrounding the future of CJTF-HOA but also because of the
unique link between Camp Lemonier and CJTF-HOA. As GAO
reported, ``AFRICOM and CJTF-HOA officials told us that Camp
Lemonier and CJFGT-HOA are separate entities and that the camp
could very well endure even if the task force does not, but the
two are integrally linked.'' It would seem to the Committee
that a joint headquarters would facilitate that operational
link.
During budget briefings on the fiscal year 2011 AFRICOM
military construction budget request, the Committee directed
AFRICOM to submit a plan for a single headquarters to
accommodate both the Camp Lemonier enduring operations and the
CJTF-HOA operations. The Committee has yet to receive the plan,
and thus has denied funding for a separate headquarters to
accommodate the current CJTF-HOA mission.
Military Construction, Army
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $3,719,419,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 4,078,798,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,797,521,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The military construction appropriation for the Army
provides for acquisition, construction, installation, and
equipment of temporary or permanent public works, military
installations, facilities, and real property for the Army. This
appropriation also provides for facilities required as well as
funds for infrastructure projects and programs required to
support bases and installations around the world.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $3,797,521,000 for the Army for
fiscal year 2011. This amount is $78,102,000 above the fiscal
year 2010 enacted level, and $281,277,000 below the budget
request. Further detail of the Committee's recommendation is
provided in the State table at the end of this report.
Museum Support Facilities.--The budget request included
$74,800,000 for three museum operations support buildings at
Army installations. The Committee recognizes the need to
preserve Army artifacts and make them available for display in
publically accessible museums. However, the Committee notes
that there are no museums at the installations for which the
museum support facilities are proposed. The Committee believes
that museum support centers should be collocated with privately
funded museums on Army installations in order to fulfill their
dual mission of preservation and education. The Committee,
therefore, recommends deferring funding for these facilities
until the Army can coordinate with private entities for the
construction of museums at these locations.
SOUTHCOM Commissary.--The budget request included
$19,000,000 to build a commissary at the U.S. Southern Command
[SOUTHCOM] headquarters in the city of Doral in Miami-Dade
County, Florida. The Committee eliminated funding for this
project, noting that, according to SOUTHCOM, there are
approximately 80 grocery stores, ranging from specialty markets
to big box stores, within close proximity to the SOUTHCOM
headquarters, and there are no barracks and no family housing
at SOUTHCOM headquarters. In general, commissary construction
and operations are funded through the Defense Commissary Agency
[DECA] surcharge fund. However, the use of those funds is
constrained by certain regulations. The Committee is concerned
that those regulations may be too restrictive and directs the
Secretary of Defense to review the policies of the DECA with
regard to the construction of new commissaries on existing
installations.
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded as early in fiscal year 2011 as
practical:
Defense Access Road, Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii.--Of
the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $1,200,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
Physical Fitness Center, Fort Richardson, Alaska.--Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $2,700,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
Chapel, Sand Hill, Fort Benning, Georgia.--Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee
directs that $550,000 be made available for the design of this
facility.
Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $3,769,003,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 3,879,104,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,667,922,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The military construction appropriation for the Navy and
Marine Corps provides for acquisition, construction,
installation, and equipment of temporary or permanent public
works, naval installations, facilities, and real property for
the Navy and the Marine Corps. This appropriation also provides
for facilities required as well as funds for infrastructure
projects and programs required to support bases and
installations around the world.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $3,667,922,000 for Navy and Marine
Corps military construction for fiscal year 2011. This amount
is $101,081,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level, and
$211,182,000 below the budget request. Further detail of the
Committee's recommendation is provided in the State table at
the end of this report.
The Committee fully expects a contract for the following
project to be awarded as early in fiscal year 2011 as
practical:
Security Upgrades, NAS Fallon, Nevada.--Of the funds
provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee
directs that $1,480,000 be made available for this project.
USNS Comfort.-- Prior to making a determination to shift
USNS Comfort's homeport, the Navy shall conduct a cost-benefit
analysis and study of the impact of such a shift on USNS
Comfort's wartime and humanitarian missions and the manning of
the military medical facilities which provide USNS Comfort's
medical staff. The Secretary of the Navy shall certify that a
homeport shift does not negatively impact cost, mission, or
medical staffing flexibility. The Navy shall provide this study
to the congressional defense committees.
Military Construction, Air Force
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $1,450,426,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,311,385,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,378,688,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The military construction appropriation for the Air Force
provides for acquisition, construction, installation, and
equipment of temporary or permanent public works, military
installations, facilities, and real property for the Air Force.
This appropriation also provides for facilities required as
well as funds for infrastructure projects and programs required
to support bases and installations around the world.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $1,378,688,000 for the Air Force
in fiscal year 2011. This amount is $71,738,000 below the
fiscal year 2010 enacted level, and $67,303,000 above the
budget request. Further detail of the Committee's
recommendation is provided in the State table at the end of
this report.
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded as early in fiscal year 2011 as
practical:
Civil Engineer Complex, Mountain Home AFB, Idaho.--Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for the
construction of this project.
Simulation Facility Expansion, Minneapolis-St. Paul IAP,
Minnesota.--Of the funds provided for minor construction in
this account, the Committee directs that $1,900,000 be made
available for the construction of this project.
Facility Repair/Fitness Recreation Center, Nellis Air Force
Base, Nevada.--Of the funds provided for minor construction in
this account, the Committee directs that $867,000 be made
available for the construction of this facility.
Fire Station, Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma.--Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee
directs that $2,000,000 be made available for the design of
this facility.
Military Construction, Defense-Wide
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $3,093,679,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 3,118,062,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,241,601,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The military construction appropriation for the Department
of Defense provides for acquisition, construction,
installation, and equipment of temporary or permanent public
works, military installations, facilities, and real property
Defense-Wide. This appropriation also provides for facilities
required as well as funds for infrastructure projects and
programs required to support bases and installations around the
world.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $3,241,601,000 for projects
considered within the ``Defense-Wide'' account in fiscal year
2011. This amount is $147,922,000 above the fiscal year 2010
enacted level and $123,539,000 above the budget request.
Further detail of the Committee's recommendation is provided in
the State table at the end of this report.
The Committee fully expects a contract for the following
project to be awarded as early in fiscal year 2011 as
practical:
Health Clinic Replacement, Gulfport, Mississippi.--Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $2,700,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION
The Committee has provided $10,000,000 for the Secretary of
Defense ``Contingency Construction'' account, equal to the
request. This account provides funds which may be used by the
Secretary of Defense for unforeseen facility requirements and
military exercises, including those related to overseas
contingency operations.
ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM
The Committee recommends $290,000,000 for the Energy
Conservation Investment Program [ECIP] plus $10,000,000 for
planning and design. This amount is $180,000,000 above the
budget request, including planning and design.
The Department of Defense accounts for nearly 80 percent of
the Federal Government's total energy consumption. Energy
consumption on military installations makes up approximately 25
percent of that total. According to testimony before this
Committee on March 11, 2010, by Dr. Dorothy Robyn, Deputy Under
Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, the
Department spent $3,800,000,000 in 2009 to power its
installations, including non-tactical vehicles used at
installations. Although installation energy consumption
represents only 28 percent of the Department's total energy
costs, installations produce nearly 40 percent of DOD's
greenhouse gas emissions.
ECIP is the only dedicated funding stream for installation
energy projects and was originally intended as a mechanism to
fund numerous small energy conservation projects with a rapid
payback period and strong savings to investment ratio. Although
military construction and sustainment, restoration, and
modernization funding can be--and is being--used for more
costly renewable energy projects, it remains a fact that energy
related projects face stiff competition from mission critical
and quality of life projects for those funds.
The Committee strongly supports investment in ECIP as a
means to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas
production on military installations, and to promote energy
security and investment in renewable energy. In the past 2
years, the Committee has more than doubled the amount of
funding requested for ECIP, providing a total of $394,209,000.
Although the budget requests for ECIP have been generally
growing over the past several years, reaching $120,000,000 for
fiscal year 2011, the funding level remains inadequate to fully
support the ambitious installation-based energy efficiency
goals of the Department, which include the goal of reducing
energy use by 30 percent by fiscal year 2015, and meeting 25
percent of installation energy needs with renewable energy
sources by 2025.
The Committee is encouraged by the Department's investment
of a portion of the fiscal year 2011 funding requested for ECIP
into energy test bed projects, intended to demonstrate next
generation technologies being developed by industry,
university, and Department of Energy laboratories. The
Committee also commends the Department for partnering with the
Department of Energy [DOE] to produce a memorandum of
understanding [MOU] identifying strategies to strengthen and
coordinate efforts to enhance national energy security. The
intent of the collaboration is to accelerate the deployment of
DOE technologies and expertise, using DOD installations as test
beds to demonstrate and create a market for innovative energy
efficiency and renewable energy technologies coming out of DOE
laboratories. A specific goal of the MOU is to develop joint
initiatives, including pilot or demonstration projects on DOD
installations, to address both military and national energy
security needs.
Although the MOU does not identify a funding source for
either agency, the Committee believes that ECIP would be a
logical source of funds to leverage DOD's investment in joint
DOD-DOE projects. The Committee is aware of many energy
efficiency, renewable energy, and greenhouse gas reduction
projects throughout the Department and the services, ranging
from major solar, wind, and geothermal power generation plants
to photovoltaic and green roof projects to net zero energy
buildings. In an effort to facilitate a holistic approach to
assessing best practices, applying today's best technologies,
and fielding next generation technologies, the Committee
directs that of the additional funding provided in this
account, the top priority for its use shall be the
establishment of installation-wide demonstration projects on
one or more bases. These demonstration projects should include,
but not be limited to, on-site renewable energy production or
purchasing; solar thermal and solar photovoltaic applications;
electrical and thermal storage; micro grid and smart grid
technologies; green and white roof technologies; metering of
utilities; digital control and sensors on new equipment
systems; energy information management systems for control,
data collection and analysis, including transmission of energy
data via network infrastructure, such as wirelessly over
commercially available digital cellular networks, if
appropriate; and emerging energy efficiency, water
conservation, and clean energy technologies from DOE, industry,
or university laboratories, with the goal of achieving a carbon
friendly, and if possible, net zero energy installation. The
Secretary of Defense is to submit to the congressional defense
committees a comprehensive plan, including project details;
description of participation with DOE or other laboratories;
energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction goals;
performance measurements; timeline, and cost estimate for the
demonstration project or projects no later than 180 days after
enactment of this act.
Green Building Technologies.--The Committee strongly
supports the efforts of the Department to incorporate green
building technologies into both new construction and
renovations of buildings. As noted in the past, the Committee
believes that these technologies should be a fundamental
consideration in the design or retrofit of all military
construction projects. Although federally mandated sustainable
design policies and energy efficiency goals are standard
elements of military construction design, the Committee
encourages the Department and the services to exceed the basic
standards and incorporate leading edge technologies into the
construction program. In particular, the Committee believes
that the Department should maximize the use of energy
efficient, eco-friendly roofing technologies for new
construction and renovations, including family housing
construction and renovation. These technologies include, but
are not limited to, photovoltaic panels, solar thermal roof
coatings, green roofs, and cool roofs. The Committee commends
the U.S. Marine Corps for establishing a policy that, beginning
with the 2012 military construction program, all new building
construction and renovations involving complete roof
replacements will incorporate roof-top solar, thermal,
photovoltaic, and energy reducing coating technologies into the
project. In an effort to capture the most innovative of these
technologies, the Committee encourages the Department and the
services to monitor new technologies emerging from government,
industry, or university research and development programs.
In the report accompanying the fiscal year 2010 military
construction bill, the Committee directed the Secretary of
Defense to submit, with the fiscal 2011 budget request, a
report on the steps being taken to incorporate new roofing
technologies into the fiscal year 2010 and 2011 military
construction program. The Committee understands that the
required data are not readily available but will be included in
the fiscal year 2010 Annual Energy Management Report, which is
due in January 2011. The Committee directs the Department to
transmit a copy of that report to the congressional defense
committees immediately upon availability.
DODEA School Initiative.--The President's budget request
includes $345,142,000 for the construction of 10 Department of
Defense Educational Activity [DODEA] elementary and high
schools as part of a major initiative to recapitalize the
Department's network of aging and inadequate schools on a
number of military installations in the United States and
overseas. In addition to the schools included in the fiscal
year 2011 budget request, the Department has embarked on an
ambitious program to replace or renovate an additional 106
schools through fiscal year 2015. The Committee views this
initiative as a unique opportunity to incorporate advanced
energy efficiency features, including the orientation of
buildings and sources of light to optimize energy efficiency;
water and wastewater conservation measures; renewable energy
resources including solar, geothermal, and wind power where
possible; smart grid technologies, and green and white roof
technologies, as both a contribution to the Department's energy
efficiency and carbon reduction goals and as a teaching tool
and learning laboratory for the Department of Defense
educational community. The Committee directs DODEA to provide,
within 60 days of enactment of this act, a detailed description
of the energy efficiency and carbon reduction technologies
incorporated into the design of the schools funded in the
fiscal year 2011 request. Additionally, DODEA is directed to
provide, with the submission of the fiscal year 2012 budget
request, a detailed plan for incorporating into each school
included in the request site-specific advanced energy and water
efficiency measures, including, but not limited to, renewable
energy opportunities, smart grid technologies, green roof and
other carbon reduction measures, and an assessment of the
feasibility of constructing a net zero energy facility.
Military Construction, Reserve Components
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $1,622,991,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,438,214,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,739,831,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The military construction appropriation for Reserve
components provides for acquisition, construction, expansion,
rehabilitation, and conversion of facilities for the training
and administration of the Reserve components. This
appropriation also provides for facilities required as well as
funds for infrastructure projects and programs required to
support bases and installations.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $1,739,831,000 for military
construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components for
fiscal year 2011. This amount is $116,840,000 above the fiscal
year 2010 enacted level and $301,617,000 above the budget
request. Further detail of the Committee's recommendation is
provided in the State table at the end of this report.
The Committee recommends approval of military construction,
Reserve components, as outlined in the following table:
RESERVE COMPONENTS
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Component Budget request recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard................... 873,664 980,072
Air National Guard.................... 176,986 337,454
Army Reserve.......................... 318,175 347,916
Navy Reserve.......................... 61,557 61,557
Air Force Reserve..................... 7,832 12,832
---------------------------------
Total........................... 1,438,214 1,739,831
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2011 as
practical:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
Regional Training Institute, Camp Robinson, Arkansas.--Of
the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $1,900,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
Photovoltaic Solar Power System, Mather AASF, California.--
Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account,
the Committee directs that $1,466,000 be made available for
this project.
Photovoltaic Solar Power System, Ventura AFRC,
California.--Of the funds provided for minor construction in
this account, the Committee directs that $1,466,000 be made
available for this project.
Photovoltaic Solar Power System, Los Alamitos AFRC,
California.--Of the funds provided for minor construction in
this account, the Committee directs that $1,466,000 be made
available for this project.
Photovoltaic Solar Power System, Banning RC, California.--
Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account,
the Committee directs that $1,466,000 be made available for
this project.
Add/Alter Security Police Facility--Bud Day Field, Sioux
City, Iowa.--Of the funds provided for minor construction in
this account, the Committee directs that $1,950,000 be made
available for the construction of this facility.
Renovation and Alteration, Chicopee Armory,
Massachusetts.--Of the funds provided for minor construction in
this account, the Committee directs that $1,554,000 be made
available for this project to accommodate the stationing of the
C/1-20th Special Forces Group.
Add/Alter Armory, Bloomington, Minnesota.--Of the funds
provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee
directs that $1,986,000 be made available for the construction
of this facility.
Range Modernization, Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada.--Of the
funds provided for minor construction in this account, the
Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for this
project.
Road Infrastructure, Joint Forces Headquarters, Omaha,
Nebraska.--Of the funds provided for planning and design in
this account, the Committee directs that $240,000 be made
available for the design of this project.
Battalion Readiness Center, Quonset State Airport, Rhode
Island.--Of the funds provided for planning and design in this
account, the Committee directs that $3,729,000 be made
available for the design of this facility.
Armory Addition, Middletown, Rhode Island.--Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee
directs that $302,000 be made available for the design of this
facility.
Firing Range and Support Facilities, Sioux Falls, South
Dakota.--Of the funds provided for planning and design in this
account, the Committee directs that $151,000 be made available
for the design of this facility.
Modification of Army Aviation Support Facility, Fort Lewis,
Washington.--Of the funds provided for minor construction in
this account, the Committee directs that $473,000 be made
available for the construction of this facility.
Emergency Generator and Supporting Facilities, Eleanor ARNG
Complex, West Virginia.--Of the funds provided for minor
construction in this account, the Committee directs that
$2,000,000 be made available for this project.
Mail/ID Center, Camp Dawson, West Virginia.--Of the funds
provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee
directs that $1,990,000 be made available for the construction
of this facility.
Utility Upgrade, Camp Dawson, West Virginia.--Of the funds
provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee
directs that $1,980,000 be made available for the construction
of this project.
JITEC Emergency Power Generator and Supporting Facilities,
Camp Dawson, West Virginia.--Of the funds provided for minor
construction in this account, the Committee directs that
$1,999,000 be made available for the construction of this
project.
Parachute Rigging Facility, Morgantown, West Virginia.--Of
the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $1,000,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
Field Maintenance Shop, Buckhannon, West Virginia.--Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $1,500,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR NATIONAL GUARD
Road Infrastructure, Joint Forces Headquarters, Omaha,
Nebraska.--Of the funds provided for planning and design in
this account, the Committee directs that $210,000 be made
available for the design of this project.
Renovations for Building 2, Blue Ash ANG Station, Ohio.--Of
the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the
Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for this
project.
Alert Facility, Joint Reserve Base, New Orleans.--Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $197,414,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 258,884,000
Committee recommendation................................ 258,884,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO] appropriation
provides for the U.S. cost share of the NATO Security
Investment Program for the acquisition and construction of
military facilities and installations (including international
military headquarters) and for related expenses for the
collective defense of the NATO Treaty area.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $258,884,000 for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program [NSIP]
for fiscal year 2011 as requested. This amount is $61,470,000
above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the
budget request.
The Committee recognizes the importance and multiplier
effect of NATO common funding for joint-use military
construction projects in Europe and the United States as well
as in support of the war in Afghanistan. It is noteworthy that
approximately one-half of the current NSIP budget is directed
toward investments to support NATO military operations in
Afghanistan. However, the Committee is concerned about the
growing proportion of the annual NSIP budget that is being
devoted to nonconstruction items, such as communications
equipment, information technology systems, and mobile tracking
systems.
The primary purpose of NSIP is to provide a common funding
source to share the burden of costly construction projects that
contribute to the security of the Alliance. According to
current NSIP expenditure documents, however, approximately 50
percent of annual NSIP funding is being used for
nonconstruction purposes. Although NSIP funds may be used for a
wide array of NATO support functions, the Committee is
concerned that the current trend may allow scarce construction
funds to be siphoned off for other activities, thus delaying
funding for needed military construction projects. In addition,
this Committee does not have oversight over nonconstruction
expenditures or requirements, and therefore cannot determine if
the NSIP funding being used for these activities is a validated
common funding requirement or is duplicative of other
investments.
The Committee believes that it may be more transparent and
appropriate to provide funding for NSIP construction and
nonconstruction activities in separate accounts under the
jurisdiction of the appropriate subcommittees. The Committee
therefore directs the Secretary of Defense to submit to the
congressional defense committees a report to accompany the
fiscal year 2012 budget request on the proportion of
construction vs. nonconstruction funding in the fiscal year
2012 NSIP budget request and a recommendation for funding
nonconstruction activities that ensures both transparency and
accountability.
Family Housing Overview
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,258,698,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,823,191,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,823,191,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Family Housing appropriation provides funds for
military family housing construction activities, operation and
maintenance, the Family Housing Improvement Fund, and the
Homeowners Assistance Program. Construction accounts provide
funding for new construction, improvements and the Federal
Government share of housing privatization. Operation and
maintenance accounts fund costs associated with the maintenance
and leasing of military family housing, including utilities,
services, management and furnishings.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $1,823,191,000 for family housing
construction, operations and maintenance, and the Department's
family housing improvement and homeowners assistance funds for
fiscal year 2011.
Family Housing Construction, Army
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $273,236,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 92,369,000
Committee recommendation................................ 92,369,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The family housing appropriation for the Army provides for
expenses of family housing for construction, including
acquisition, replacement, addition, expansion, extension, and
alteration. This appropriation provides for the financing of
all costs for construction, improvements and leasing of all
Army housing. In addition to quality of life enhancements, the
program contains initiatives to reduce operating costs and
conserve energy by upgrading or replacing facilities which can
be made more efficient through relatively modest investments in
improvements. The Department of Defense is authorized to use
limited partnerships, make direct and guaranteed loans, and
convey Department-owned property to stimulate the private
sector to increase the availability of affordable, quality
housing for the Army.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $92,369,000 for family housing
construction, Army, including construction improvements, in
fiscal year 2011. This amount is $180,867,000 below the fiscal
year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request.
CONSTRUCTION
The Committee recommends $57,369,000 for new construction,
as shown below:
ARMY FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Location Installation Project title Budget request recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska.................................. Fort Wainwright............ Family Housing Replacement Construction.......... 21,000 21,000
Germany................................. Baumholder................. Family Housing Replacement Construction.......... 34,329 34,329
Worldwide............................... Various Locations.......... Planning and Design.............................. 2,040 2,040
-------------------------------
Total............................. ........................... ................................................. 57,369 57,369
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:
ARMY CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Location Installation Project title Budget request recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pennsylvania............................ Carlisle Barracks.......... Family Housing Privatization..................... 15,000 15,000
Virginia................................ Fort Eustis................ Family Housing Privatization..................... 20,000 20,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. ........................... ................................................. 35,000 35,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Army
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $523,418,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 518,140,000
Committee recommendation................................ 518,140,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The family housing operation and maintenance appropriation
for the Army provides for the operation and maintenance of
family housing. This includes debt payment, leasing, minor
construction, principal and interest charges, and insurance
premiums of Army family housing.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $518,140,000 for family housing
operation and maintenance, Army for fiscal year 2011. This
amount is $5,278,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level
and equal to the budget request.
Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $146,569,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 186,444,000
Committee recommendation................................ 186,444,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The family housing appropriation for the Navy and Marine
Corps provides for expenses of family housing for construction,
including acquisition, replacement, addition, expansion,
extension, and alteration. This appropriation provides for the
financing of all costs for construction, improvements, and
leasing of all Navy and Marine Corps housing. In addition to
quality of life enhancements, the program contains initiatives
to reduce operating costs and conserve energy by upgrading or
replacing facilities which can be made more efficient through
relatively modest investments in improvements. The Department
of Defense is authorized to use limited partnerships, make
direct and guaranteed loans, and convey Department-owned
property to stimulate the private sector to increase the
availability of affordable, quality housing for the Navy and
Marine Corps.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $186,444,000 for family housing
construction, Navy and Marine Corps, including construction
improvements, in fiscal year 2011. This amount is $39,875,000
above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the
budget request.
CONSTRUCTION
The Committee recommends $40,424,000 for new construction,
as shown below:
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Location Installation Project title Budget request recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cuba.................................... Naval Station, Guantanamo Replace Base Housing, 71 Units at Various Sites.. 37,169 37,169
Bay.
Worldwide............................... Various Locations.......... Planning and Design.............................. 3,255 3,255
-------------------------------
Total............................. ........................... ................................................. 40,424 40,424
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Location Installation Project title Budget request recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California.............................. MCB Camp Pendleton......... Camp Pendleton PPV Phase 8....................... 26,748 26,748
North Carolina.......................... Camp Lejuene............... Camp Lejeune PPV Phase 7 with DODDS addition..... 79,908 79,908
Washington, D.C......................... Marine Barracks 8th & I.... Replace Interior Passenger Lift Quarters #6...... 100 100
Japan................................... CFA Sasebo................. Revitalization of Family Housing Town- homes.... 10,769 10,769
Japan................................... CFA Yokosuka............... Revitalization of Family Housing Apart- ments... 17,479 17,479
Japan................................... Marine Corps Air Station Whole House Revitalization Midrise 906........... 11,016 11,016
Iwakuni.
-------------------------------
Total............................. ........................... ................................................. 146,020 146,020
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $368,540,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 366,346,000
Committee recommendation................................ 366,346,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The family housing operation and maintenance appropriation
for the Navy and Marine Corps provides for the operation and
maintenance of family housing. This includes debt payment,
leasing, minor construction, principal and interest charges,
and insurance premiums of Navy and Marine Corps family housing.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $366,346,000 for family housing
operation and maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal
year 2011. This amount is $2,194,000 below the fiscal year 2010
enacted level and equal to the budget request.
Family Housing Construction, Air Force
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $66,101,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 78,025,000
Committee recommendation................................ 78,025,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The family housing appropriation for the Air Force provides
for expenses of family housing for construction, including
acquisition, replacement, addition, expansion, extension, and
alteration. This appropriation provides for the financing of
all costs for construction, improvements and leasing of all Air
Force housing. In addition to quality of life enhancements, the
program contains initiatives to reduce operating costs and
conserve energy by upgrading or replacing facilities which can
be made more efficient through relatively modest investments in
improvements. The Department of Defense is authorized to use
limited partnerships, make direct and guaranteed loans, and
convey Department-owned property to stimulate the private
sector to increase the availability of affordable, quality
housing for the Air Force.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $78,025,000 for family housing
construction, Air Force, in fiscal year 2011. This amount is
$11,924,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal
to the budget request.
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:
AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Location Installation Project title Budget request recommendation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Japan................................... Kadena AB....................... Improve Family Housing, Phase 11 (403 units) 73,800 73,800
Worldwide............................... Various......................... Planning and Design......................... 4,225 4,225
-------------------------------
Total............................. ................................ ............................................ 78,025 78,025
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Air Force
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $502,936,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 513,792,000
Committee recommendation................................ 513,792,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The family housing operation and maintenance appropriation
for the Air Force provides for the operation and maintenance of
family housing. This includes debt payment, leasing, minor
construction, principal and interest charges, and insurance
premiums of Air Force family housing.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $513,792,000 for family housing
operation and maintenance, Air Force, in fiscal year 2011. This
amount is $10,856,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level,
and equal to the budget request.
Family Housing Construction, Defense-Wide
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,859,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends no funding for family housing
construction, Defense-Wide, in fiscal year 2011 as requested by
the President.
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $49,214,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 50,464,000
Committee recommendation................................ 50,464,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The family housing operation and maintenance appropriation
for Defense-Wide provides for the operation and maintenance of
family housing. This includes debt payment, leasing, minor
construction, principal and interest charges, and insurance
premiums of Defense family housing.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $50,464,000 for family housing
operation and maintenance, Defense-Wide for fiscal year 2011.
This amount is $1,250,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted
level and equal to the budget request.
Family Housing Improvement Fund
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,600,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,096,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,096,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The family housing improvement appropriation provides for
the Department of Defense to undertake housing initiatives and
to provide an alternative means of acquiring and improving
military family housing and supporting facilities. This account
provides seed money for housing privatization initiatives.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $1,096,000 for the Family Housing
Improvement Fund for fiscal year 2011. This amount is
$1,504,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal
to the budget request.
Homeowners Assistance Fund
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $323,225,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 16,515,000
Committee recommendation................................ 16,515,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Homeowners Assistance Program [HAP] provides funds to
assist eligible military personnel and civilian Federal
employee homeowners who sustain a loss on the sale of their
primary residence due to a declining residential real estate
market attributable to the closure or realignment of a military
installation. In 2009, the HAP was expanded to provide mortgage
relief to wounded warriors and spouses of fallen warriors, and
to provide temporary mortgage relief to all military and
qualified civilian personnel required by the Department to
relocate who sustained losses on the sale of their homes due to
the mortgage crisis. Program expenses include payments to
homeowners for losses on private sales; cost of judicial
foreclosure; property acquisition by liquidating and/or
assuming outstanding mortgages; partial payment of homeowners'
lost equity on Government acquisitions; retirement of debt
after sale of properties when the Government assumes mortgages;
and administrative expenses.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $16,515,000 for the Homeowners
Assistance Program for fiscal year 2011. This amount is equal
to the budget request. In response to the current mortgage
crisis, Public Law 111-5, the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, included a provision to temporarily
expand the HAP through 2012 to military and certain civilian
personnel and their families who receive orders to relocate and
cannot sell their homes or face steep losses as a result of the
severe national economic downturn, not solely because of a BRAC
action. The provision also extends the program permanently to
wounded warriors who must relocate for medical reasons or to
surviving spouses of fallen warriors.
Through the ARRA and the fiscal year 2010 military
construction appropriations bill, the Committee has provided a
total of $855,000,000 to fully fund the projected cost of the
expanded HAP program. However, given the popularity of the
program, the higher than anticipated individual claim awards,
and the continued weakness in the housing market, the Committee
is concerned about the accuracy of the funding projections and
the adequacy of the current funding level, particularly in
light of the fact that the Department did not request any
additional funds for the expanded HAP program in its fiscal
year 2011 budget submission. Therefore, the Committee directs
the Secretary of Defense to provide to the congressional
defense committees, within 60 days of enactment of this act, a
comprehensive report on the status of the expanded HAP program
through the end of fiscal year 2010. The report shall provide
the following information: (1) the number of claims filed and
the number adjudicated; (2) the total dollar amount of claims
filed, and the total dollar amount of payments against those
claims; (3) the unobligated balances remaining available for
the payments of expanded HAP benefits; (4) the projected
expenditure of the unobligated funds by category (e.g.
permanent change of station, wounded warrior, BRAC impact
waiver) and timeline; (5) an updated projection of the number
of claims expected through 2012; (6) the estimated cost to
fully fund the program through 2012 at the optimal level of
benefits; and (7) the projected shortfall in funds, if any, to
provide the optimal level of benefits.
Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense-Wide
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $151,541,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 124,971,000
Committee recommendation................................ 124,971,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
This account provides funding for design and construction
of full-scale chemical disposal facilities and associated
projects to upgrade installation support facilities and
infrastructure required to support the Chemical
Demilitarization Program. This account was established starting
in fiscal year 2005 to comply with section 141(b) of the fiscal
year 2003 National Defense Authorization Act.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $124,971,000 for chemical
demilitarization construction projects for fiscal year 2011, a
decrease of $26,570,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted
level and equal to the President's budget request.
The Committee continues to urge the Department to take all
necessary and appropriate steps to dispose of the U.S. chemical
weapons stockpile by the 2012 Chemical Weapons Convention
deadline and, under no circumstances, later than 2017
consistent with section 8119 of Public Law 110-116. In light of
the need for the Department to carry out its mission promptly
and safely it will need to provide close oversight over the
execution of contracts at the chemical demilitarization sites
to ensure funds are spent prudently and efficiently. The
Committee will continue to monitor closely the Department's
compliance with both deadlines.
Base Closure Account 1990
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $496,768,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 360,474,000
Committee recommendation................................ 360,474,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The base closure appropriation (1990) provides for clean up
and disposal of property consistent with the four closure
rounds required by the base closure acts of 1988 and 1990.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends a total of $360,474,000 for the
Base Closure Account 1990 for fiscal year 2011. This amount is
$136,294,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal
to the President's budget request.
BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW
From fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2010, a total of
$24,971,667,000 has been appropriated for the environmental
clean up of military installations closed or realigned under
prior BRAC rounds. The total amount appropriated for BRAC 1990,
combined with the Committee recommendation for fiscal year
2011, is $25,332,141,000.
In appropriating these funds, the Committee continues to
provide the Department with broad flexibility to allocate funds
by service, function, and installation. The following table
displays the total amount appropriated for each round of base
closure, including amounts recommended for fiscal year 2011 for
BRAC 1990.
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, 1990
[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2011]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year
--------------------------------------
1990-2009 2011 Committee Total
2010 enacted recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I.............................. $2,684,577,000 (\1\) (\1\) $2,684,577,000
Part II............................. 4,915,636,000 (\1\) (\1\) 4,915,636,000
Part III............................ 7,269,267,000 (\1\) (\1\) 7,269,267,000
Part IV............................. 9,605,419,000 $496,768,000 $360,474,000 10,462,661,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... 24,474,899,000 496,768,000 360,474,000 25,322,141,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Not Applicable.
Base Closure Account 2005
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $7,455,498,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 2,354,285,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,354,285,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The base realignment and closure appropriation for 2005
provides for clean up and disposal of property consistent with
the 2005 closure round required by the Defense Base Closure and
Realignment Act of 1990 (10 U.S.C. 2687 note).
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends a total of $2,354,285,000 for the
Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 for fiscal year
2011. This amount is $5,101,213,000 below the fiscal year 2010
enacted level and equal to the budget request.
The following chart details projects to be carried out
using BRAC 2005 funding. The Committee continues to direct that
any above-threshold cost or scope variation, any cancellation
of projects, or any transfer of funds among construction
projects associated with the BRAC 2005 projects identified in
the table following this narrative be subject to the standard
reprogramming and notification requirements that apply to the
regular military construction appropriation.
BRAC 2005 PROJECTS
[Dollars in thousands]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission
State Service Location recommendation Project Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maryland.......................... Agency--TMA........... Bethesda (WRNMMC).............. 169................ Traffic Mitigation, Increment 2.................................. $7,600
Maryland.......................... Agency--TMA........... Bethesda (WRNMMC).............. 169................ Defense Access Roads--Medical Center Entrance.................... 20,000
Texas............................. Agency--TMA........... Fort Sam Houston............... 172................ San Antonio Military Medical Center (North), Increment 4......... 93,941
Virginia.......................... Agency--NGA........... Fort Belvoir................... 168................ NGA Headquarters Facility........................................ 83,328
Virginia.......................... Agency--TMA........... Fort Belvoir................... 169................ Hospital Replacement, Increment 5................................ 63,637
Virginia.......................... Agency--WHS........... Fort Belvoir................... 133................ Office Complex, Increment 4...................................... 5,610
------------
Total MILCON................ ...................... ............................... ................... ................................................................. 274,116
============
Various........................... Army.................. Various........................ ................... Environmental.................................................... 73,511
Various........................... Navy.................. Various........................ ................... Environmental.................................................... 15,201
Various........................... Air Force............. Various........................ ................... Environmental.................................................... 19,555
Various........................... Defense-wide.......... Various........................ ................... Environmental.................................................... ...........
------------
Total Environmental......... ...................... ............................... ................... ................................................................. 108,267
============
Various........................... Army.................. Various........................ ................... Operation and Maintenance........................................ 887,231
Various........................... Navy.................. Various........................ ................... Operation and Maintenance........................................ 321,888
Various........................... Air Force............. Various........................ ................... Operation and Maintenance........................................ 99,570
Various........................... Defense-wide.......... Various........................ ................... Operation and Maintenance........................................ 476,764
------------
Total Operation and ...................... ............................... ................... ................................................................. 1,785,453
Maintenance.
============
Various........................... Army.................. Various........................ ................... Military Personnel Moves......................................... ...........
Various........................... Navy.................. Various........................ ................... Military Personnel Moves......................................... 1,456
Various........................... Air Force............. Various........................ ................... Military Personnel Moves......................................... 1,277
Various........................... Defense-wide.......... Various........................ ................... Military Personnel Moves......................................... ...........
------------
Total MilPers PCS........... ...................... ............................... ................... ................................................................. 2,733
============
Various........................... Army.................. Various........................ ................... Other............................................................ 51,678
Various........................... Navy.................. Various........................ ................... Other............................................................ 3,601
Various........................... Air Force............. Various........................ ................... Other............................................................ 6,853
Various........................... Defense-wide.......... Various........................ ................... Other............................................................ 121,584
------------
Total Other................. ...................... ............................... ................... ................................................................. 183,716
============
TOTAL FISCAL YEAR 2011 ...................... ............................... ................... ................................................................. 2,354,285
FUNDING FOR BRAC 2005.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Provisions
Sec. 101. The Committee includes a provision that restricts
payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract for work,
except in cases of contracts for environmental restoration at
base closure sites.
Sec. 102. The Committee includes a provision that permits
use of funds for hire of passenger motor vehicles.
Sec. 103. The Committee includes a provision that permits
use of funds for defense access roads.
Sec. 104. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits
construction of new bases inside the continental United States
for which specific appropriations have not been made.
Sec. 105. The Committee includes a provision that limits
the use of funds for purchase of land or land easements.
Sec. 106. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits
the use of funds to acquire land, prepare a site, or install
utilities for any family housing except housing for which funds
have been made available.
Sec. 107. The Committee includes a provision that limits
the use of minor construction funds to transfer or relocate
activities among installations.
Sec. 108. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits
the procurement of steel unless American producers,
fabricators, and manufacturers have been allowed to compete.
Sec. 109. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits
payments of real property taxes in foreign nations.
Sec. 110. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits
construction of new bases overseas without prior notification.
Sec. 111. The Committee includes a provision that
establishes a threshold for American preference of $500,000
relating to architect and engineering services for overseas
projects.
Sec. 112. The Committee includes a provision that
establishes preference for American contractors for military
construction in the United States territories and possessions
in the Pacific, and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in countries
bordering the Arabian Sea.
Sec. 113. The Committee includes a provision that requires
notification of military exercises involving construction in
excess of $100,000.
Sec. 114. The Committee includes a provision that limits
obligations during the last 2 months of the fiscal year.
Sec. 115. The Committee includes a provision that permits
funds appropriated in prior years to be available for
construction authorized during the current session of Congress.
Sec. 116. The Committee includes a provision that permits
the use of expired or lapsed funds to pay the cost of
supervision for any project being completed with lapsed funds.
Sec. 117. The Committee includes a provision that permits
obligation of funds from more than 1 fiscal year to execute a
construction project, provided that the total obligation for
such project is consistent with the total amount appropriated
for the project.
Sec. 118. The Committee includes a provision that directs
the Department to report annually on actions taken to encourage
other nations to assume a greater share of the common defense
burden.
Sec. 119. The Committee includes a provision that allows
transfer of proceeds from earlier base closure accounts to the
continuing base closure account (1990, parts I-IV).
Sec. 120. The Committee includes a provision that permits
the transfer of funds from Family Housing Construction accounts
to the DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund and from Military
Construction accounts to the DOD Military Unaccompanied Housing
Improvement Fund.
Sec. 121. The Committee includes a provision that requires
the service secretaries to notify the congressional defense
committees of all family housing privatization solicitations
and agreements which contain any clause providing consideration
for base realignment and closure, force reductions and extended
deployments.
Sec. 122. The Committee includes a provision that provides
transfer authority to the Homeowners Assistance Fund.
Sec. 123. The Committee includes a provision that requires
that all acts making appropriations for military construction
be the sole funding source of all operation and maintenance for
family housing, including flag and general officer quarters,
and limits the repair on flag and general officer quarters to
$35,000 per unit per year without prior notification to the
congressional defense committees.
Sec. 124. The Committee includes a provision that provides
authority to expend funds from the ``Ford Island Improvement''
account.
Sec. 125. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits
the expenditure of funds at installations or for projects no
longer necessary as a result of BRAC 2005.
Sec. 126. The Committee includes a provision that allows
the transfer of expired funds to the Foreign Currency
Fluctuation, Construction, Defense Account.
Sec. 127. The Committee includes a provision that allows
the reprogramming of military construction and family housing
construction funds among projects and activities within the
account in which they are funded.
TITLE II
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Items of Special Interest
HEARINGS
The Subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans
Affairs and Related Agencies held one hearing related to the
fiscal year 2011 Department of Veterans Affairs [VA] budget
request on April 15, 2010. The subcommittee heard testimony
from the Honorable Eric Shinseki, Secretary of the Department
of Veterans Affairs.
Additionally, on May 20, 2010, the subcommittee held a
joint hearing with the Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing
and Urban Development related to homeless veteran programs
administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommendation includes $123,270,764,000 for
the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2011,
including $63,849,146,000 in mandatory spending and
$59,421,618,000 in discretionary spending.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Veterans Administration was established on July 21,
1930, as an independent agency by Executive Order 5398, in
accordance with the Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 1016). This
act authorized the President to consolidate and coordinate
Federal agencies specially created for or concerned with the
administration of laws providing benefits to veterans,
including the Veterans' Bureau, the Bureau of Pensions, and the
National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers. On March 15,
1989, the Veterans Administration was elevated to Cabinet-level
status as the Department of Veterans Affairs.
The VA's mission is to serve America's veterans and their
families as their principal advocate in ensuring they receive
the care, support, and recognition they have earned in service
to the Nation. As of September 30, 2009, there were an
estimated 23.1 million living veterans, with 23 million of them
residing in the United States and Puerto Rico. There were an
estimated 35.2 million dependents (spouses and dependent
children) of living veterans in the United States and Puerto
Rico, and there were over 530,000 survivors of deceased
veterans receiving VA survivor benefits in the United States
and Puerto Rico. Thus, more than 58.7 million people, or 18.9
percent of the total estimated resident population of the
United States and Puerto Rico, were recipients or potential
recipients of veterans benefits from the Federal Government.
The VA's operating units include the Veterans Benefits
Administration, Veterans Health Administration, National
Cemetery Administration, and staff support offices.
The Veterans Benefits Administration [VBA] provides an
integrated program of nonmedical veterans benefits. The VBA
administers a broad range of benefits to veterans and other
eligible beneficiaries through 57 regional offices and a
records processing center in St. Louis, Missouri. The benefits
provided include: compensation for service-connected
disabilities; pensions for wartime, needy, and totally disabled
veterans; vocational rehabilitation assistance; educational and
training assistance; home buying assistance; estate protection
services for veterans under legal disability; information and
assistance through personalized contacts; and six life
insurance programs.
The Veterans Health Administration [VHA] develops,
maintains, and operates a national healthcare delivery system
for eligible veterans; carries out a program of education and
training of healthcare personnel; conducts medical research and
development; and furnishes health services to members of the
Armed Forces during periods of war or national emergency. A
system of 153 hospitals, 1,031 outpatient clinics, 135 nursing
homes, and 90 VA residential rehabilitation treatment programs
is maintained to meet the VA's medical mission.
The National Cemetery Administration [NCA] provides for the
interment of the remains of eligible deceased servicemembers
and discharged veterans in any national cemetery with available
grave space; permanently maintains these graves; provides
headstones and markers for the graves of eligible persons in
national and private cemeteries; administers the grant program
for aid to States in establishing, expanding, or improving
State veterans cemeteries; and provides certificates to
families of deceased veterans recognizing their contributions
and service to the Nation. The National Cemetery Administration
includes 164 cemeterial installations and activities.
Staff support offices include the Office of Inspector
General, Boards of Contract Appeals and Veterans Appeals, and
General Administration offices, which support the Secretary,
Deputy Secretary, Under Secretary for Benefits, Under Secretary
for Health, Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs, and General
Counsel.
Veterans Benefits Administration
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $56,734,419,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 64,013,884,000
Committee recommendation................................ 64,013,884,000
ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW
The Veterans Benefits Administration [VBA] is responsible
for the payment of compensation and pension benefits to
eligible service-connected disabled veterans, as well as
education benefits and housing loan guarantees.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $64,013,884,000 for the Veterans
Benefits Administration. This amount is composed of
$53,492,234,000 for Compensation and pensions; $10,440,245,000
for Readjustment benefits; $62,589,000 for Veterans insurance
and indemnities; $19,078,000 for the Veterans housing benefit
program fund, with $165,000,000 in credit subsidies and
$163,646,000 for administrative expenses; $48,000 for the
Vocational rehabilitation loans program account, with $337,000
for administrative expenses; and $707,000 for the Native
American veteran housing loan program account.
COMPENSATION AND PENSIONS
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $47,396,106,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 53,492,234,000
Committee recommendation................................ 53,492,234,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Compensation is payable to living veterans who have
suffered impairment of earning power from service-connected
disabilities. The amount of compensation is based upon the
impact of disabilities on a veteran's earning capacity. Death
compensation or dependency and indemnity compensation is
payable to the surviving spouses and dependents of veterans
whose deaths occur while on active duty or result from service-
connected disabilities. A clothing allowance may also be
provided for service-connected veterans who use a prosthetic or
orthopedic device. In fiscal year 2011, the Department
estimates that the Compensation program will provide payments
to 3,434,556 veterans, 380,525 survivors, and 1,213 dependents
receiving special benefits.
Pensions are an income security benefit payable to needy
wartime veterans who are precluded from gainful employment due
to non-service-connected disabilities which render them
permanently and totally disabled. Public Law 107-103, the
Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, restored
the automatic presumption of permanent and total nonservice
connected disability for purposes of awarding a pension to
veterans age 65 and older, subject to the income limitations
that apply to all pensioners. Death pensions are payable to
needy surviving spouses and children of deceased wartime
veterans. The rate payable for both disability and death
pensions is determined on the basis of the annual income of the
veteran or their survivors. In fiscal year 2011, the Department
estimates that the Pensions program will provide benefits to
308,829 veterans and 194,210 survivors.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $53,492,234,000 for Compensation
and pensions. This is an increase of $6,096,128,000 above the
fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request.
The appropriation includes $30,423,000 in payments to the
General operating expenses, veterans benefits administration;
Medical support and compliance; and Information technology
systems accounts for expenses related to implementing
provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990,
the Veterans' Benefits Act of 1992, the Veterans' Benefits
Improvements Act of 1994, and the Veterans' Benefits
Improvements Act of 1996.
READJUSTMENT BENEFITS
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $9,232,369,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 10,440,245,000
Committee recommendation....................... 10,440,245,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Readjustment benefits appropriation finances the
education and training of veterans and servicemembers under
chapters 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42 and 43 of
title 38, United States Code. These benefits include the All-
Volunteer Force Educational Assistance Program (Montgomery GI
bill) and the Post 9/11 Educational Assistance Program. Basic
benefits are funded through appropriations made to the
readjustment benefits appropriation and by transfers from the
Department of Defense. This account also finances vocational
rehabilitation, specially adapted housing grants, specially
adapted automobile grants for certain disabled veterans, and
educational assistance allowances for eligible dependents of
those veterans who died from service-connected causes or who
have a total permanent service-connected disability, as well as
dependents of servicemembers who were captured or missing in
action.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $10,440,245,000 for Readjustment
benefits. This is an increase of $1,207,876,000 above the
fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request.
VETERANS INSURANCE AND INDEMNITIES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $49,288,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 62,589,000
Committee recommendation................................ 62,589,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Veterans insurance and indemnities appropriation
consists of the former appropriations for military and naval
insurance, applicable to World War I veterans; National Service
Life Insurance, applicable to certain World War II veterans;
Servicemen's indemnities, applicable to Korean conflict
veterans; and veterans mortgage life insurance to individuals
who have received a grant for specially adapted housing.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $62,589,000 for Veterans insurance
and indemnities. This is an increase of $13,301,000 above the
fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request.
The Department estimates there will be 7,051,185 policies in
force in fiscal year 2011 with a value of $1,336,891,000,000.
VETERANS HOUSING BENEFIT PROGRAM FUND
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative
Program account expenses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appropriations, 2010................ $23,553,000 $165,082,000
Budget estimate, 2011............... 19,078,000 163,646,000
Committee recommendation............ 19,078,000 163,646,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Veterans housing benefit program fund provides for all
costs associated with the VA's direct and guaranteed housing
loan programs, with the exception of the Native American
veteran housing loan program.
VA loan guaranties are made to servicemembers, veterans,
reservists, and unremarried surviving spouses for the purchase
of homes, condominiums, and manufactured homes, and for
refinancing loans. VA guarantees part of the total loan,
permitting the purchaser to obtain a mortgage with a
competitive interest rate, even without a downpayment, if the
lender agrees. The VA requires that a downpayment be made for a
manufactured home. With a VA guaranty, the lender is protected
against loss up to the amount of the guaranty if the borrower
fails to repay the loan.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends such sums as may be necessary for
funding subsidy payments, estimated to total $19,078,000; and
$163,646,000 for administrative expenses for fiscal year 2011.
Bill language limits gross obligations for direct loans for
specially-adapted housing to $500,000.
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION LOANS PROGRAM ACCOUNT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative
Program account expenses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appropriations, 2010................ $29,000 $328,000
Budget estimate, 2011............... 48,000 337,000
Committee recommendation............ 48,000 337,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Vocational rehabilitation loans program account covers
the cost of direct loans for vocational rehabilitation of
eligible veterans and, in addition, includes administrative
expenses necessary to carry out the direct loan program. Loans
of up to $1,095 (based on the indexed chapter 31 subsistence
allowance rate) are currently available to service-connected
disabled veterans enrolled in vocational rehabilitation
programs, as provided under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31, when the
veteran is temporarily in need of additional assistance.
Repayment is made in 10 monthly installments, without interest,
through deductions from future payments of compensation,
pension, subsistence allowance, educational assistance
allowance, or retirement pay. Virtually all loans are repaid in
full and most in less than 1 year.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $48,000 for program costs and
$337,000 for administrative expenses for the Vocational
rehabilitation loans program account. The administrative
expenses may be transferred to and merged with the General
operating expenses, veterans benefits administration account.
Bill language is included limiting program direct loans to
$3,042,272. It is estimated that the VA will make 3,286 loans
in fiscal year 2011, with an average amount of $926.
NATIVE AMERICAN VETERAN HOUSING LOAN PROGRAM ACCOUNT
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $664,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 707,000
Committee recommendation................................ 707,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Native American Veteran Housing Loan Program is
authorized by 38 U.S.C. chapter 37, section 3761 to provide
direct loans to Native American veterans living on trust lands.
The loans are available to purchase, construct, or improve
homes to be occupied as veteran residences, or to refinance a
loan previously made under this program in order to lower the
interest rate. The principal amount of a loan under this
authority is limited to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation's single-family conventional conforming loan limit.
Veterans pay a funding fee of 1.25 percent of the loan amount,
although veterans with a service-connected disability are
exempt from paying the fee. Before a direct loan can be made,
the veteran's tribal organization must sign a memorandum of
understanding with the VA regarding the terms and conditions of
the loan. The Native American Veteran Housing Loan Program
began as a pilot program in 1993 and was made permanent by
Public Law 109-233, the Veterans Housing Opportunity and
Benefits Act of 2006.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $707,000 for administrative
expenses associated with this program. This is $43,000 above
the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget
request.
Veterans Health Administration
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $45,077,500,000
Appropriations, 2011.................................... 48,183,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 590,000,000
Budget estimate, advance appropriation, 2012............ 50,610,985,000
Committee recommendation, 2011.......................... 710,000,000
Committee recommendation, advance appropriation, 2012... 50,610,985,000
ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW
The Veterans Health Administration [VHA] operates the
largest Federal medical care delivery system in the country,
with 153 hospitals, 90 VA residential rehabilitation treatment
programs, 135 nursing homes, and 1,031 outpatient clinics,
which include independent, satellite, community-based, and
rural outreach clinics.
The Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Care Collections
Fund [MCCF] was established by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997
(Public Law 105-33). In fiscal year 2004, Public Law 108-199
allowed the Department to deposit first-party and
pharmaceutical co-payments; third-party insurance payments and
enhanced use collections; long-term care co-payments;
Compensated Work Therapy Program collections; Compensation and
Pension Living Expenses Program collections; and Parking
Program fees into the MCCF.
The Parking Program provides funds for the construction,
alteration, and acquisition (by purchase or lease) of parking
garages at VA medical facilities authorized by 38 U.S.C. 8109.
The Secretary is required under certain circumstances to
establish and collect fees for the use of such garages and
parking facilities. Receipts from the parking fees are to be
deposited into the MCCF and are used for medical services
activities.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $710,000,000 for the Veterans
Health Administration for fiscal year 2011, without
collections. This amount is composed of $100,000,000 for
Medical services; $20,000,000 for Medical facilities; and
$590,000,000 for Medical and prosthetic research. Medical care
collections are expected to be $3,393,000,000. Additionally,
the Committee provided an advance appropriation of
$48,183,000,000 for veterans medical care for fiscal year 2011
in the fiscal year 2010 bill. Therefore, VHA will have total
resources of $52,286,000,000, plus any carryover from fiscal
year 2010, available in fiscal year 2011. In addition, the
Committee recommendation also includes an advance appropriation
of $50,610,985,000 for veterans medical care for fiscal year
2012.
AREAS OF INTEREST
VA Nursing Academy.--The Committee commends the VA for
addressing the nursing shortage through the Veterans Affairs
Nursing Academy. This 5-year pilot program is designed to
establish partnerships with competitively selected nursing
schools to expand the number of teaching faculty in VA
facilities and affiliated nursing schools in order to increase
student enrollment in baccalaureate nursing programs. The
Committee also urges the VA to continue its collaboration with
the Department of Defense through the Uniformed Services
University of the Health Services by providing nurse faculty
and nursing students in graduate nursing education programs.
Advanced Nursing Education.--The Committee urges the VA, in
conjunction with accredited schools of nursing, to explore the
development of a fast track doctoral training program which
would facilitate completion of a doctorate in nursing by
qualified nurses employed within the VA network who possess a
bachelor of science in nursing.
Licensing Requirements at DOD/VA Collocated Facilities.--
The Committee supports efforts to eliminate additional burdens
placed on healthcare providers by requiring two different
licensing processes at collocated facilities for the Department
of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs. Providing
the highest quality of healthcare for service men and women,
and veterans is the Committee's number one priority. In an
effort to ensure that providers are able to efficiently and
effectively care for their patients without imposing additional
burdens on health providers, the Committee directs the
Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to
examine ways in which duplicative licensing requirements may be
eliminated at collocated facilities and to report these
findings to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of
Congress no later than March 18, 2011.
Services for Women Veterans.--The Committee is aware that
the percentage of women veterans receiving care at the VA is
expected to double in the next 5 years. Many of these women
veterans have experienced combat and will present needs that VA
has likely not seen before in this population. The Committee
remains dedicated to ensuring that the evolving needs of women
veterans are met. Accordingly, the Committee encourages the VA
to continue and expand their ongoing study of women's issues,
develop and provide a capital plan for facility upgrades, and
expand outreach to ensure these veterans are aware of the
benefits they have earned.
Infrastructure Improvements.--In May 2010, the Department
of Veterans Affairs announced the Surgical Complexity
Initiative to ensure that VA medical centers with inpatient
surgical programs have the best available infrastructure in
relation to the complexity of the surgical procedures being
performed. While the Committee is pleased with this initiative
to enhance patient safety, the Department must ensure that this
initiative does not result in limitations on specialty of care
or quality of care. The Committee is concerned that campus-
style facilities in small and mid-sized cities, including the
medical centers in Danville, Illinois; Des Moines, Iowa;
Wichita, Kansas; Spokane, Washington; Sioux Falls, South
Dakota; and Salem, Virginia, have not received necessary
infrastructure improvements critical to the care of their
patient populations. Not later than 90 days after enactment of
this act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall report to the
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress ways in
which infrastructure improvements at small and mid-sized
medical centers may be used to expand access for rural veterans
to specialty care and improve overall quality of care.
Outreach to Rural Veterans.--The Committee urges the
Department to partner with State and local organizations to
conduct outreach to veterans in underserved areas in order to
find and support veterans living in rural and highly rural
areas to ensure they receive the care and benefits to which
they are entitled.
Toxic Exposures.--The Committee directs the Department to
take all necessary and appropriate steps in coordination with
the Department of Defense to identify and treat veterans
suffering ill effects from potential exposure to dangerous
chemical agents during their military service. The Department
must ensure that healthcare providers at all levels are
knowledgeable of occupational and environmental health threats
in locations in which their patients have served. The Committee
encourages the Department to systematically update providers on
specific issues developing in deployed areas and ensure that
providers document confirmed and possible exposures in
individual medical records and make use of registry programs
for long-term medical follow-up and surveillance.
Cost Saving Initiative.--Over the past decade, the
Department has undertaken an effort to modernize its medical
facilities through new construction and renovation. This
recapitalization effort is imperative to the delivery of high
quality medical care. Often when a new surgical ward or other
treatment facility undergoes construction, the VA has to find
alternative areas for treatment or contract care to non-VA
medical providers. The Committee believes that the VA could
achieve cost savings during renovation or construction by
either leasing or purchasing mobile units. The Committee
encourages the Department to launch a pilot project in at least
two VISNs that have renovation or construction projects
underway, to lease or purchase mobile surgical units through a
full and open competition while construction is underway.
Additionally, the VA should develop metrics for a cost benefit
analysis to determine whether this approach has achieved
savings versus contracting care through local medical
providers.
Rural Telehealth/Electronic Health Records.--The Committee
is aware that the Health Resources and Services Administration
[HRSA] within the Department of Health and Human Services has
begun an initiative to provide rural healthcare providers with
telehealth equipment and electronic health record systems that
will complement the VA's Rural Health Initiative. The Committee
urges the VA to collaborate with HRSA to ensure that both
initiatives succeed in improving the health of veterans in
remote and rural areas.
Blind Rehabilitative Services.--The Committee cautions that
private providers for blind rehabilitation may not have the
full specialized nursing, physical therapy, pain management,
speech pathology, pharmacy services, lab or radiology support
services, along with ophthalmology, optometry, and other
important surgery specialists to provide the clinical care
necessary for the returning combat eye injured or wounded. The
Committee urges that any non-VA medical providers treating
veterans demonstrate peer reviewed quality outcome measurements
that are a standard part of the Veterans Health
Administration's Blind Rehabilitative Service. In cases where
it is necessary to refer a visually impaired or blinded veteran
to a non-VA blind rehabilitative center, VA should ensure that
the center be accredited by either the National Accreditation
Council for Agencies Serving the Blind and Visually Handicapped
or the Commission For Accreditation of Rehabilitation
Facilities, and that the employed specialists be certified by
the Academy for Certification of Vision Rehabilitation and
Education Professionals.
MEDICAL SERVICES
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $34,707,500,000
Appropriations, 2011.................................... 37,136,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Budget estimate, advance appropriation, 2012............ 39,649,985,000
Committee recommendation, 2011.......................... 100,000,000
Committee recommendation, advance appropriation, 2012... 39,649,985,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Medical services account provides for medical services
of enrolled eligible veterans and certain dependent
beneficiaries in VA medical centers, VA outpatient clinics,
contract hospitals, State homes, and outpatient programs on a
fee basis. Hospital and outpatient care is also provided by the
private sector for certain dependents and survivors of veterans
under the civilian health and medical programs for the VA.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
In fiscal year 2010, the Committee provided an advance
appropriation of $37,136,000,000 for fiscal year 2011. This
year, the Committee recommends an additional $100,000,000 for
the Medical services account. When combined, this amount is
$2,528,500,000 over the fiscal year 2010 enacted level. In
addition, the VA has the authority to retain co-payments and
third-party collections, estimated to total $3,393,000,000 in
fiscal year 2011.
The Committee recommendation also includes an advance
appropriation of $39,649,985,000 for Medical Services for
fiscal year 2012. This is $2,413,985,000 above the level for
fiscal year 2011 and equal to the fiscal year 2012 budget
request.
The recommendation along with the advance appropriation
provided in last year's bill fully funds the Department's
estimate for Medical Services, which includes: $5,235,402,000
for mental healthcare; $2,574,756,000 to provide medical care
to Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom
veterans; $179,000,000 for readjustment counseling;
$1,998,368,000 for prosthetics; and $799,210,000 for homeless
programs.
The Committee has also provided additional funds to
implement new requirements carried in Public Law 111-163, the
Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010,
which was signed by the President on May 5, 2010. This includes
an additional $24,576,000, as well as $35,424,000 included in
the base estimate, for a total of $60,000,000, for caregiver
support; $36,000,000 for provisions relating to women veteran
healthcare; $3,000,000 for grants to Veteran Service
Organizations to transport veterans in highly rural areas to VA
medical centers; and $23,424,000 for other new requirements
contained in Public Law 111-163. The Committee is aware that
the VA is currently developing regulations to implement these
new requirements and directs the VA to include the budget
resources necessary for fiscal year 2012 in the fiscal year
2012 budget request.
The recommendation also includes an additional $3,000,000
for the Homeless Grant and Per Diem Program and $10,000,000 to
open new vet centers across the country and on Native American
reservations.
Homeless Veterans.--According to the VA, roughly 107,000
veterans are homeless on any given night. The average homeless
veteran served in the post-Vietnam era (1975-1990), is 51,
male, single, and has an income of less than $125 per week.
Female veterans are the fastest growing segment of the homeless
population, and minority veterans represent 53 percent of the
total homeless population. Over the past year, the VA has
elevated the plight of homeless veterans by making the
elimination of homelessness a central goal of the Department.
The Committee applauds this effort and has provided
$3,400,944,000, including $799,210,000 to support VA's direct
homeless programs, within the fiscal year 2011 appropriation.
Further, the Committee has provided an additional $3,000,000
for the homeless grant and per diem program and $10,000,000
within the Minor Construction account to support the
Department's renovation efforts on VA campuses of underutilized
and surplus buildings for the conversion into housing options
for homeless veterans.
The Committee remains concerned that the nutritional,
housing, medical, and social work needs of homeless veterans
living in rural areas are not adequately being addressed by
current VA programs, especially in areas where the VA lacks
services, leading to an underestimation of the number of
homeless veterans requiring care and services. The Committee
directs the Secretary to conduct an assessment of the needs of
homeless veterans living in these areas and to submit a plan to
the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress
within 180 days after enactment of this act. The plan should
address alternative means of service delivery, if appropriate,
in areas where VA services are unavailable, such as reimbursing
local providers for these services.
Vet Centers.--The Committee recommendation includes an
additional $10,000,000 for the Department to establish new vet
centers across the country. The Committee is concerned that
Native American veterans often have to travel long distances to
receive the care in which they are entitled. Over the past
several years, the Committee has encouraged greater
collaboration between the VA and the Indian Health Service
[IHS] to ensure that these veterans do not fall through the
cracks. The Committee believes that this collaboration should
continue and expand. However, the Department must do a better
job at providing Native American veterans access to VA
facilities. For instance, there are currently only three Vet
Centers operating on Native American reservations. The goal of
Vet Centers is to provide a broad range of counseling,
outreach, and referral services to eligible veterans in order
to help them make a satisfying post-war readjustment to
civilian life. These centers play a vital role in providing
services to veterans. Therefore, within these funds, the
Committee directs the VA to work with American Indian, Alaska
Native, and Native Hawaiian organizations to open additional
vet centers in Native communities.
Women Veterans Healthcare Technology.--The Committee is
aware of the advances in medical technologies, specifically
advances in digital colposcopy. This device allows medical
providers to detect cervical cancer at an earlier stage, which
can greatly improve prognosis. Some digital colposcopies on the
market today are compatible with the VA's electronic medical
record, which can allow providers to compare abnormalities from
visit to visit. The Committee urges the VA to move as quickly
as possible to acquire this technology and implement it in the
field and directs the Department to report back to the
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress by
January 21, 2011, on the number of devices acquired and the
locations of their use.
Virtual Colonoscopy.--Virtual colonoscopy utilizes
noninvasive technology to detect colorectal cancer. The high
prevalence of colorectal cancer in the veterans population,
coupled with the fact that fewer than one-half of those age 50
and older who should be screened for the disease opt to receive
the traditional exams, points to a need for the VA to more
actively utilize this noninvasive procedure. The Committee
urges the VA to acquire virtual colonoscopy technology and
deploy it as quickly as possible.
Guide and Service Dog Program.--The Committee directs the
Department of Veterans Affairs to fully and rapidly implement
section 1714 of title 38, United States Code, regarding the
provision of guide dogs and service dogs to qualified veterans
seeking such services. Additionally, the Committee directs the
Department to continue assisting those veterans with mental
illnesses, including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, who would
benefit from having a service dog. The Committee urges the
Department to consult with nonprofit organizations with
expertise in the training and provision of service dogs and
education in the use of service dogs in order to review current
policies and regulations. The Department is directed to report
back to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of
Congress by February 25, 2011, on the status of implementing
section 1714 of title 38.
Northern Rockies and the Dakotas Polytrauma Network Site.--
The Committee is aware that there is no Department of Veterans
Affairs Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center or Polytrauma Network
Site for the care of wounded veterans with traumatic brain
injuries in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho, or
Wyoming. This area encompasses approximately 740,000 square
miles. The vastness of this area imposes significant hardships
on veterans who require care within the Department of Veterans
Affairs Polytrauma System of Care and who wish to live close to
home and their families while receiving care. Therefore, the
Committee directs the Department of Veterans Affairs to submit
to Congress a report on the feasibility and advisability of
establishing a Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center or Polytrauma
Network Site in the Northern Rockies or the Dakotas.
Tissue Sample Tracking.--The Committee is aware the VA may
not be using the most current and efficient methods for
handling tissue samples for testing. As more veterans with
complex needs are entering the VA system, it is critical the
tissue samples are handled using best practices to minimize
errors within the system. The Committee urges the VA to review
its tissue handling process and encourages the Department to
examine commercial methods in order to ensure it is using the
most efficient and exact system.
Age-related Hearing Loss.--The Committee recognizes the
incidence and severity of hearing loss due to faulty sensory
nerves, known as sensorineural hearing loss, and that the
associated costs are increasing at dramatic rates. Currently,
there are no approved therapeutics that either prevent or treat
sensorineural hearing loss, a leading and costly cause of
disability within the VA system. The Committee encourages the
VA to examine and support the development and clinical testing
of therapeutics aimed at preventing and treating sensorineural,
age-related, noise-induced, and drug-induced hearing loss.
Weber Valley, Utah.--The Committee is aware of the lack of
access to readjustment counseling, including vet center
services, for veterans living in and around Weber County, Utah,
and directs the Department to report back to the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress by October 30, 2010,
on how it will meet the readjustment counseling needs of Weber
County-area veterans. The study should include the following:
veterans current and future needs for readjustment counseling
in and around Weber County; the feasibility of establishing a
vet center in Ogden, Utah; and the frequency that the Salt Lake
City vet center, or any other VA asset, provides on-site
counselors to veterans in and around Weber County.
Infection Control and Injection Safety Practices.--The
Committee is deeply concerned with the rise in the number of
disease outbreaks in the U.S. healthcare system related to the
reuse of medical equipment, including syringes, scopes, and
multi-dose vials. In the January 2009 edition of the Annals of
Internal Medicine, an article published by the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] revealed the occurrence of
33 outbreaks of viral hepatitis in healthcare settings over the
last decade, and during the last 3 years, reports have revealed
widespread problems in both the DOD and VA healthcare systems
in which thousands of veterans and servicemembers were
potentially exposed to hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, and blood
borne diseases. The most recent occurrence was in March of this
year at the St. Louis VA Medical Center, where an internal
inspection led to the discovery that dental equipment had not
been cleaned using standard operating procedures or
manufacturer's guidelines. The Committee encourages the
Department of Veterans Affairs to work with the CDC to educate
and raise awareness for infection control and injection safety
practices across the VA healthcare network.
National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.--The
Committee remains supportive of efforts being developed by the
National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in advancing
the agenda for research and education on post traumatic stress
disorder [PTSD]. At a time when independent and Government
experts in the area of PTSD are warning of the likelihood that
large numbers of returning combat troops from Iraq and
Afghanistan are suffering from mental disorders and PTSD, the
Department should ensure that sufficient funding is provided
for the Center. The Committee directs that the Department
submit to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of
Congress by October 1, 2010, a detailed plan outlining the
resources being provided to the Center and any expected
increases in fiscal year 2011. Further, the Committee directs
that the Center's budget be listed as a selected program
highlight in future budget requests.
MEDICAL SUPPORT AND COMPLIANCE
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $4,930,000,000
Appropriations, 2011.................................... 5,307,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Budget estimate, advance appropriation, 2012............ 5,535,000,000
Committee recommendation, 2011..........................................
Committee recommendation, advance appropriation, 2012... 5,535,000,000
The Medical support and compliance account provides funds
for management, security, and administrative expenses within
the VA healthcare system, in addition to providing costs
associated with the operation of VA medical centers and
clinics, VISN offices, and the VHA Central Office in
Washington, DC. This appropriation also covers Chief of Staff
and Facility Director operations, quality of care oversight,
legal services, billing and coding activities, procurement,
financial management, security, and human resource management.
The President's 2011 submission for Medical Support and
Compliance is based on an actuarial analysis founded on the
current and projected veteran population, enrollment
projections of demand, and case mix changes associated with
current veteran patients.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
In fiscal year 2010, the Committee provided an advance
appropriation of $5,307,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 for the
Medical support and compliance account. This is $377,000,000
above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level. Additionally, the
Committee recommendation includes an advance appropriation of
$5,535,000,000 for Medical support and compliance for fiscal
year 2012, which is $228,000,000 above the level for fiscal
year 2011 and equal to the budget request for fiscal year 2012.
MEDICAL FACILITIES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $4,859,000,000
Appropriations, 2011.................................... 5,740,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Budget estimate, advance appropriation, 2012............ 5,426,000,000
Committee recommendation, 2011.......................... 20,000,000
Committee recommendation, advance appropriation, 2012... 5,426,000,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Medical facilities account provides funds for the
operation and maintenance of the VA healthcare system's vast
capital infrastructure. This appropriation provides for costs
associated with utilities, engineering, capital planning,
leases, laundry, groundskeeping, housekeeping, facility repair,
and property disposition and acquisition.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
In fiscal year 2010, the Committee provided an advance
appropriation of $5,740,000,000 for fiscal year 2011 for the
Medical facilities account. The Committee recommends an
additional $20,000,000 for the medical facilities account. When
combined, this amount is $901,000,000 above the fiscal year
2010 enacted level. Additionally, the Committee recommendation
includes an advance appropriation of $5,426,000,000 for Medical
facilities for fiscal year 2012. This is $334,000,000 below the
level for fiscal year 2011 and equal to the fiscal year 2012
budget request.
Rural Clinic Initiative.--Last year, the Committee provided
the Department $30,000,000 for the VA to open new Community
Based Outpatient Clinics [CBOC] in rural areas. CBOCs are an
integral part of the VA's healthcare delivery system. Often
these clinics serve as the only link to direct VA medical care
for veterans who reside in areas where there are no VA
hospitals. While the Department has done a better job over the
past several years in opening new CBOCs, the Committee was
disappointed that the budget request did not include additional
funds to establish new clinics in rural and highly rural areas.
Therefore, the Committee has provided an additional $10,000,000
for the establishment of CBOCs in rural and highly rural
markets. The Committee directs the Department to provide to the
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress a
detailed expenditure plan for this funding no later than March
1, 2011. The plan should also include a list of all current
clinics, regardless of size or contractual arrangements, which
provide healthcare services in an outpatient setting. The
Committee understands that the Department funds new outpatient
clinics through the Medical Services account as well as the
Medical Facilities account and reminds the Department that it
may reprogram funds between these accounts for this initiative.
Port Angeles Community Based Outpatient Clinic.--The
Committee is aware there is a need for more medical
practitioners to provide services at the Port Angeles CBOC. We
are concerned about sufficient access to primary care, mental
health, and specialty care for the veterans living in Clallam
and Jefferson Counties. While we are pleased at the VA's effort
to improve the availability of care for those living on the
Olympic Peninsula, we urge the VA to ensure it is adequately
staffed in order to meet the critical needs of these deserving
veterans.
MEDICAL AND PROSTHETIC RESEARCH
Appropriations, 2010........................... $581,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 590,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 590,000,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Medical and prosthetic research account provides funds
for medical, rehabilitative, and health services research.
Medical research supports basic and clinical studies that
advance knowledge leading to improvements in the prevention,
diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and disabilities.
Rehabilitation research focuses on rehabilitation engineering
problems in the fields of prosthetics, orthotics, adaptive
equipment for vehicles, sensory aids and related areas. Health
services research focuses on improving the effectiveness and
economy of the delivery of health services.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $590,000,000 for Medical and
prosthetic research. This is $9,000,000 above the fiscal year
2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request.
The Committee remains highly supportive of this program,
and recognizes its importance both in improving healthcare
services to veterans and recruiting and retaining high-quality
medical professionals in the Veterans Health Administration.
Through the Department's research and development program, the
VA has implemented a comprehensive research agenda to develop
new treatments and tools for clinicians to ease the physical
and psychological pain of men and women returning from war
zones, to improve access to VA healthcare services, and to
accelerate discoveries and applications, especially for
neurotrauma, sensory loss, amputation, polytrauma, and related
prosthetic needs.
Nursing Research Program.--The Committee supports the
Veterans Affairs Nursing Research Program, which facilitates
research on the specific nursing needs of combat veterans and
aging veterans. The Committee strongly supports continuation of
this program. The Committee also encourages collaboration
between VA nurses and recipients of Tri Service Nursing
Research Program awards in the exploration of research
proposals that improve the health and well-being of their
shared beneficiary population.
Longitudinal Study.--On September 14, 2009, the Secretary
announced that the VA would fulfill its mandate carried in
section 212 of Public Law 106-419, the Veterans Benefits and
Health Care Improvement Act of 2000, by soliciting bids for the
National Vietnam Veterans Longitudinal Study. This follow-up
study will provide long awaited data on long-term effects of
combat-related post traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] among
Vietnam veterans, regardless of whether these veterans were
utilizing the VA system, and the effectiveness of VA medical
care in treating PTSD. The Committee is pleased to learn that
the VA is undertaking this independent follow-up study;
however, it is concerned about the length of time it is taking
the Department to move forward. Sufficient resources have been
provided within Medical and prosthetic research to enter into a
contract with an appropriate entity to carry out a study on
post-traumatic stress disorder as mandated in Public Law 106-
419. The Committee directs the Department to report back to the
Committees on Appropriations no later than October 1, 2010, on
the progress made in executing this legal requirement.
Gulf War Illness.--The Committee directs the Department of
Veterans Affairs to report to the Committees on Appropriations
of both Houses of Congress not later than 90 days after
enactment of this act on specific research efforts related to
gulf war illness and the ways in which the Department's
research efforts are coordinated with similar programs at the
Department of Defense, the Institute of Medicine and other
Federal agencies.
MEDICAL CARE COST RECOVERY COLLECTIONS
MEDICAL CARE COLLECTION FUND
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,954,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 2,405,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,393,000,000
MEDICAL CARE COLLECTION FUND--REVENUES APPLIED
Appropriations, 2010.................................... -$2,954,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... -2,405,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ -3,393,000,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Medical Care Collection Fund [MCCF] was established by
the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Public Law 105-33). In fiscal
year 2004, Public Law 108-199 allowed the Department of
Veterans Affairs to deposit first party and pharmacy co-
payments; third party insurance payments and enhanced use
collections; long-term care co-payments; Compensated Work
Therapy Program collections; and Parking Program fees into the
MCCF. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs has the authority to
transfer funds from the MCCF to the Medical services account.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommendation includes the authority to
retain co-payments and third-party collections, estimated to
total $3,393,000,000 in fiscal year 2011.
National Cemetery Administration
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $250,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 250,504,000
Committee recommendation................................ 250,504,000
ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW
The National Cemetery Administration [NCA] was established
in accordance with Public Law 93-94, the National Cemeteries
Act of 1973. It has a four-fold mission: to provide for the
interment in any national cemetery of the remains of eligible
deceased servicemembers and discharged veterans, together with
their spouses and certain dependents, and to permanently
maintain their graves; to provide headstones for, and to mark
graves of, eligible persons in national, State, and private
cemeteries; to administer the grant program for aid to States
in establishing, expanding, or improving State veterans
cemeteries; and to administer the Presidential Memorial
Certificate Program.
In 2010, cemeterial activities will encompass a total of
164 cemeterial installations in 39 States, the District of
Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The Committee's recommendation for
NCA provides funds for all of these cemeterial installations.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $250,504,000 for the National
Cemetery Administration. This is an increase of $504,000 from
the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget
request.
The Committee has included bill language to make available
through September 30, 2012, up to $25,500,000 of the National
Cemetery Administration appropriation.
Departmental Administration
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $7,545,707,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 7,754,492,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,661,807,000
ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW
Departmental Administration provides for the administration
of veterans benefits through the Veterans Benefits
Administration [VBA], the executive direction of the
Department, several top level supporting offices, the Board of
Contract Appeals, and the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $7,661,807,000 for Departmental
administration. The amount is composed of $2,148,776,000 for
General operating expenses, veterans benefits administration;
$439,613,000 for General administration; $3,147,000,000 for
information technology systems; $111,867,000 for the Office of
the Inspector General; $1,197,586,000 for Construction, major
projects; $485,965,000 for Construction, minor projects;
$85,000,000 for Grants for construction of State extended care
facilities; and $46,000,000 for Grants for the construction of
State veterans cemeteries.
GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $2,086,707,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 2,588,389,000
Committee recommendation\1\.............................................
\1\Funding for General Operating Expenses is provided for in the General
Operating Expenses, Veterans Benefits Administration; and General
Administration accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The administration's budget request proposes that funding
for the administrative expenses associated with the Veterans
Benefits Administration and all Department-wide offices be
included within one single appropriation account. The Committee
recommendation includes funding for these functions in two
separate accounts: General operating expenses, Veterans
Benefits Administration; and General administration, as opposed
to one account as proposed in the budget request. The Committee
believes that differences in the mission and purpose of the
Department's executive offices and the Veterans Benefits
Administration justify providing funding in two separate
accounts. Further, separating these two broad categories will
provide the Congress with greater visibility of budgetary
resources and oversight of expenditures for these two vital
missions.
GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES, VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2010\1\.................................($1,689,207,000)
Budget estimate, 2011\2\................................ (2,148,776,000)
Committee recommendation................................ 2,148,776,000
\1\$1,689,207,000 was provided for the Veterans Benefits
Administration's administrative expenses under the General Operating
Expenses account in fiscal year 2010.
\2\The budget request includes $2,148,776,000 for the Veterans Benefits
Administration's administrative expenses within the General Operating
Expenses account.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The General Operating Expenses, Veterans Benefits
Administration account provides funding for the Veterans
Benefits Administration to administer entitlement programs such
as service-connected disability compensation, education
benefits, and vocational rehabilitation services.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $2,148,776,000 for General
Operating Expenses, Veterans Benefits Administration. The
Committee has proposed creating this new account to provide
increased visibility and oversight of expenditures associated
with VBA. This amount is $459,569,000 above the fiscal year
2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. The
recommendation fully funds the budget request for VBA to
address increasing disability claims and the workload
associated with Agent Orange presumption claims. The Department
estimates that the increase above the fiscal year 2010 level
will provide 4,048 permanent jobs for claims processors. The
Committee has included bill language to make available through
September 30, 2012, up to $108,008,000 for General operating
expenses, veterans benefits administration.
Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment.--The budget
request included $12,000,000 for supplies associated with the
``printer on every desk'' initiative. However, subsequent to
the submission of the budget request, the Department determined
that implementation costs of this nationwide initiative
significantly outweighed the benefits and has informed the
Committee that no funding will be expended on this initiative
in fiscal year 2011. The Committee directs the Department to
utilize the $12,000,000 associated within this account for the
``printer on every desk'' initiative to hire an additional 100
Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment [VR&E] counselors and
coordinators. The VR&E program has experienced a substantial
increase in workload over the last several years, growing from
87,485 in 2007 to an estimated 110,983 in 2010. The Department
anticipates more than 122,000 veterans and servicemembers will
receive services from the VR&E program in 2011. However,
staffing within the program, namely counselors and employment
coordinators, has increased only moderately over that same
period, from 1,020 in 2007 to 1,155 in 2010. The Committee
believes the VR&E program is a critical component in the
Department's efforts to help veterans who have service-
connected disabilities obtain employment or live independently
in their homes and in their communities if employment is not
currently feasible for them.
Staff and skill shortages in the VR&E workforce, as well as
organizational weaknesses in the program as a whole, were
documented by the Government Accountability Office in January
2009. Therefore, the Committee directs the Department to submit
to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress
a strategic workforce plan for the VR&E program, which should
include the following: (1) using relevant data to determine
what the workforce's target caseload should be over the next 5
years; (2) using relevant data to identify current and future
human capital needs, such as the appropriate number of
employees to handle the estimated workload, how they are to be
deployed across the organization, and what percentage of cases
are likely to require extended evaluations and thus more
manpower; and (3) identifying the critical skills and
competencies staff will need to achieve the organization's
mission and goals. The Committee directs the Department to
submit this strategic workforce plan before obligating these
additional funds.
Claims Processing.--The Committee remains committed to
ensuring that the VA has the resources necessary to provide
timely processing of disability claims. From 2000 to 2009, the
VA has seen annual new claim filings increase by 75 percent,
from 578,773 in 2000 to 1,013,712 in 2009. In fiscal year 2011,
the VA is expecting to receive 1,318,753 new compensation and
pension claims, a 30 percent increase from 2009. Currently, the
average time a veteran must wait to have a claim processed is
161 days. However, the recent decision by the Department to
provide compensation benefits to veterans and survivors for
three diseases presumed to be connected to service in Vietnam
and exposure to Agent Orange, will push the average waiting
time to 190 days. Claims adjudicators spend far too much time
managing paper rather than rating claims. While the Committee's
recommendation includes the requested funding for new claims
processors, the VA must do a better job of harnessing new
technology to expedite this process. This includes converting
paper records to digital format, utilizing commercial off the
shelf technology, and developing new Information Technology
solutions to accommodate digital formats. To assist the
Department in accomplishing these goals, the Committee has
provided funding within the Information Technology Systems [IT]
account for the VBA's Innovation Initiative, as well as the
requested funding for the Paperless Delivery of Veterans
Benefits Initiative.
Outreach Efforts in Rural Areas.--It is imperative that the
Department provide widespread outreach efforts to inform
veterans of their benefits, particularly education benefits to
which they may be entitled. The Committee remains concerned
that in rural and highly rural areas and on Native American
reservations outreach efforts are lacking. The Committee
directs the Department to submit a report to the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress by March 4, 2011,
detailing outreach efforts underway to promote the Post 9/11
Educational Assistance Program on Native American reservations
and highly rural areas, such as Alaska and Hawaii. Where
appropriate the report should include what cultural sensitivity
training the VA is providing to its personnel as part of these
efforts.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
Appropriations, 2010\1\................................. ($397,500,000)
Budget estimate, 2011\2\................................ (439,613,000)
Committee recommendation................................ 439,613,000
\1\$397,500,000 was provided for general administration under the
General Operating Expenses account in fiscal year 2010.
\2\The budget request includes $439,613,000 for general administration
within the General Operating Expenses account.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The General administration account provides funding for the
Office of the Secretary, six Assistant Secretaries and three
independent staff offices. The budget request proposes funding
these operations within the General operating expenses account,
which includes funding for the administrative functions of the
Veterans Benefits Administration.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $439,613,000 for General
administration. This amount is $42,113,000 above the fiscal
year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request. To
provide the Secretary with the flexibility to address any
emerging needs, the recommendation includes bill language
providing transfer authority between line offices, as well as
to General operating expenses, Veterans Benefits
Administration. The Committee has included bill language to
make available through September 30, 2012, up to $22,000,000
for General administration. The funding recommendation for each
line office is provided in the table below.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year
Department 2011 budget Committee
request recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of the Secretary................. 10,808 10,808
Office of Veterans Appeals.............. 75,198 75,198
Office of the General Counsel........... 91,049 91,049
Office of Management.................... 48,557 48,557
Office of Human Resources............... 76,177 76,177
Office of Policy and Planning........... 28,783 28,783
Office of Operations Security and 22,091 22,091
Preparedness...........................
Office of Public and Intergovernmental 23,705 23,705
Affairs................................
Office of Congressional Affairs and 7,247 7,247
Legislative Affairs....................
Office of Acquisition, Logistics and 55,998 55,998
Construction...........................
-------------------------------
Total............................. 439,613 439,613
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reducing Improper Payments.--Beginning in 1982, the Federal
Managers' Financial Integrity Act has required Government
agency heads to establish controls that safeguard Government
assets against fraud, waste, and abuse when the Federal
Government makes payments to individuals and businesses as
program beneficiaries, grantees, or contractors. The Veterans
Health Administration's [VHA] Fee Care Program pays non-VA
medical providers to treat eligible veterans when medical
services are not available at VA facilities or in emergencies
when delays are hazardous to life or health, including the
delivery of inpatient, outpatient, prescription, and long-term
care services. The Fee Care Program has experienced rapid
growth in the past 8 years, from $890,000,000 in 2002 to
$3,800,000,000 in 2009.
VHA's Chief Business Office oversees the Fee Care Program
and provides policy, training, and program support to fee
offices, which processed about 5 million claims in 2009. Four
Veterans Integrated Service Networks [VISNs] have established
consolidated fee offices that process all claims within their
respective regions; however, in the remaining 13 VISNs, local
medical centers are responsible for processing their own fee
claims from non-VA medical providers, including the
organization, staffing, and management controls for their
respective fee offices. Due to the highly decentralized nature
of fee offices, the VA Office of Inspector General estimated
that VHA improperly made $225,000,000 in overpayments for
outpatient fee claims in 2008 and concluded that VHA lacks
internal controls to assess the risk of fraud, waste, and abuse
in its Fee Care Program. While it is worth noting that 87
percent of VA fee claims are pre-authorized by local medical
centers, likely reducing the risk of intentional fraud, the
prevalence of pre-authorized claims within VA's fee claim
workload does not necessarily reduce the risk of waste and
abuse, such as overpayments.
The Department's 2011 budget request includes $1,600,000
for the Office of Management to increase its audit capacity of
fee care offices. With these funds, the Department anticipates
conducting comprehensive audits of approximately 7 sites, or 10
to 12 fee offices. The Committee strongly supports these
efforts and directs the Department to provide up to an
additional $1,850,000 from any anticipated carryover from
fiscal year 2010 to fiscal year 2011 to increase the number of
audits. These additional funds will allow the Department to
conduct 14 comprehensive audits covering 20 to 25 fee offices.
Furthermore, because these audit reviews are an inherently
governmental function, the Committee directs the Department to
develop the organic expertise and technological capabilities
within the VA.
Federally Funded Research and Development Center Study.--
Within the available funds provided to General administration,
including available carryover from fiscal year 2010, the
Committee directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to award a
grant or contract to the National Academy of Public
Administration, an independent, nonpartisan organization that
was chartered by Congress to assist Federal, State, and local
governments in improving their effectiveness, efficiency, and
accountability, to conduct a study on improvements to
management structures of the Fee Care Program. The study should
examine the following: the feasibility and advisability of
consolidating fee offices within VHA's Fee Care Program; what
cost-savings, if any, would be realized if such consolidation
occurred; and whether such consolidation would allow for
sufficient management controls to reduce improper payments
within the Fee Care Program. The review should also include a
best practices comparison of such activities conducted by other
healthcare payment organizations, such as the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Department of Defense
TRICARE Management Activity, and the VA's Consolidated Patient
Account Centers for third-party billing.
Report Requirement.--On March 20, 2010, the President
issued a memorandum directing agency heads to expand Payment
Recapture Audits to the extent permitted by law and where cost
effective. A Payment Recapture Audit, as defined in the
memorandum, is a type of recovery audit whereby accountants
identify improper payments made to contractors or other
entities to uncover such problems as duplicate payments,
payments for services not rendered, overpayments, and
fictitious vendors. The memorandum references one approach that
has worked effectively to identify and reduce improper payments
in Government programs: having highly skilled accounting
specialists and fraud examiners use new technology to recover
improper payments, with their compensation tied to the
identification of misspent funds. The Committee directs the
Department to report to the Committees on Appropriations of
both Houses of Congress by October 30, 2010, on what steps have
been taken to adopt Payment Recapture Audits as a means of
reducing and recovering improper payments.
Franchise Fund.--The Franchise Fund was established in 1997
as a pilot program and made permanent in fiscal year 2006 under
Public Law 109-114. The Committee directs the Department to
provide a report on the Franchise Fund's business plan for
fiscal year 2011. This plan should include a list of services,
customers, overhead expenses, funds collected for services, and
the unobligated balance from the previous fiscal year. The VA
shall submit this report to the Committees on Appropriations of
both Houses of Congress no later than 60 days following
enactment of this act.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $3,307,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 3,307,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,147,000,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Information Technology [IT] appropriation, along with
reimbursements, funds the costs of all IT staff salaries and
expenses, the operations and maintenance of all existing
information technology systems, and the development of new
projects and programs designed to improve the delivery of
service to veterans. This appropriation also funds the costs
associated with the Office of Information and Technology, which
oversees the functions highlighted above.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $3,147,000,000 for the Information
Technology Systems account. This amount is $160,000,000 below
the fiscal year 2010 level and the budget request.
The Committee recommendation includes $966,000,000 for
staff salaries and expenses, $1,453,685,000 for the operation
and maintenance of existing programs, and $727,315,000 for new
program development, all according to the Department's fiscal
year 2011 budget submission.
On June 19, 2009, the Secretary announced the Program
Management Accountability System [PMAS], a new Department-wide
management approach to IT projects which centers on incremental
development with frequent milestones. PMAS is intended to
eliminate long-term program failures by focusing customers,
vendors, and programmers on near-term, small deliveries. While
the Committee remains very supportive of these new internal
governance and accountability steps, implementation has caused
the VA to slow projects that are not meeting milestones. This
has led to large unobligated balances within the IT account
associated with program development, changing the resources
needed in fiscal year 2011 for this activity. As a result, the
Committee has reduced the development request by $160,000,000
rather than provide funding which is not needed.
To continue to increase oversight into IT system
development, the Committee has included bill language that
restricts the obligation of IT development funds until the
Secretary or the Chief Information Officer submits a
certification letter to the Committees on Appropriations of
both Houses of Congress identifying which project/program is to
receive funding in fiscal year 2011 and for how much. To
maximize the Secretary's flexibility, the certification letters
may be submitted incrementally, and upon submission, these
letters will serve as the reprogramming threshold for
development programs.
Further, the Office of Information Technology is directed
to provide an IT expenditure report to the Committees on
Appropriations on a monthly basis. This report shall include a
comparison to the project costs included in the certifications
letter submitted to the Congress, and provide an explanation
for any differences in excess of $1,000,000.
Innovation Initiative.--On June 7, 2010, the Secretary
announced the opening of the Industry Innovation Initiative
Competition, the most recent effort under the VA Innovation
Initiative [VAi\2\]. VAi\2\ is a Department-wide program aimed
at bringing the most promising innovations to VA's most
important challenges by involving employees and the private
sector in the creation of visionary solutions in service to
veterans. This recent competition targets advancement in
innovative housing technology to address veteran homelessness;
telehealth; new models of dialysis and renal disease
prevention; improvement of polytrauma care; reduction of
adverse drug events; and an integrated veterans business
accelerator designed to assist in the launch, maintenance and
long-term success of veteran-owned businesses. The Committee is
very supportive of these efforts being made to incorporate new
solutions and commercial off the shelf technology to solve
these problems. In fiscal year 2011, the Department has
requested $40,000,000 within the Information Technology Systems
account for VBA Innovation Initiatives. The Committee directs
the Department to utilize a portion of these funds for an open
competition to utilize commercial off the shelf technology to
develop a decision support system and automate the VBA's
Veterans Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Committee
further directs that upon award of a contract and development
of this automated tool that it be piloted in at least one
regional office and that metrics for evaluating its success be
implemented.
DOD/VA Information Technology Interoperability.--The
Committee supports the efforts of the Department of Veterans
Affairs and Department of Defense to integrate programs and
medical record systems at the Captain James A. Lovell Federal
Health Care Center, the first totally integrated Federal
healthcare facility in the country. The Committee recognizes
the significant challenges facing the Departments in their
efforts to fully integrate all information management/
information technology systems, especially with orders
portability, and urges the Departments to take all necessary
and appropriate steps to rapidly develop and deploy capacity to
integrate information management/information technology
systems.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $109,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 109,367,000
Committee recommendation................................ 111,867,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Office of Inspector General [OIG] was established by
the Inspector General Act of 1978 and is responsible for the
audit, investigation, and inspection of all Department of
Veterans Affairs programs and operations.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $111,867,000 for the Office of
Inspector General. This is $2,867,000 above the fiscal year
2010 enacted level and $2,500,000 above the budget request. The
Committee has included bill language to make available through
September 30, 2012, up to $6,000,000 for the Office of the
Inspector General.
CONSTRUCTION, MAJOR PROJECTS
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $1,194,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 1,151,036,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,197,586,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Construction, major projects account provides for
constructing, altering, extending, and improving any of the
facilities (including parking projects) under the jurisdiction
or for the use of the VA, including planning, architectural and
engineering services, Capital Asset Realignment Enhanced
Services [CARES] activities, assessment, and site acquisition
where the estimated cost of a project is more than the amount
set forth in 38 U.S.C. 8104(a)(3)(A). Proceeds realized from
Enhanced Use Lease activities may be deposited into the
Construction, major projects and Construction, minor projects
accounts.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,197,586,000
for the construction of major projects. This is $3,586,000
above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and $46,550,000 above
the budget request.
The following table reflects the President's budget request
for major construction projects and activities, and the
corresponding Committee recommendations.
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 2011 Committee
Location and description request recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Veterans Health Administration
[VHA]:
New Orleans, LA--New Medical 310,000 310,000
Facility.......................
Denver, CO--New Medical Facility 450,700 450,700
Palo Alto, CA--Polytrauma/ 30,000 30,000
Ambulatory Care Replacement....
Alameda Point, CA--Outpatient 17,332 17,332
Clinic and Columbarium (Design)
Omaha, NE--Hospital Replacement 56,000 56,000
Facility (Design)..............
Beckley, WV--Nursing Home Care ................ 46,550
Unit...........................
Advanced Planning Fund--Various 89,750 89,750
Locations......................
Facility Security Projects-- 41,390 41,390
Various Locations..............
Judgment Fund--Various Locations 6,000 6,000
BRAC Land Acquisition--Various 13,000 13,000
Locations......................
Resident Engineers for Major 23,964 23,964
Construction--Various Locations
-----------------------------------
Total VHA..................... 1,038,136 1,084,686
===================================
National Cemetery Administration
[NCA]:
Indiantown Gap, PA--Gravesite 23,500 23,500
Expansion and Cemetery
Improvements--Phase 4..........
Los Angeles, CA--Columbarium 27,600 27,600
Expansion......................
Tahoma, WA--Gravesite Expansion 25,800 25,800
and Cemetery Improvements--
Phase 2........................
Advanced Planning Fund--Various 20,000 20,000
Locations......................
NCA Land Acquisition Fund-- 10,000 10,000
Various Locations..............
-----------------------------------
Total NCA..................... 106,900 106,900
===================================
General Administration--Staff 6,000 6,000
Offices Department Advance Planning
Fund...............................
===================================
Total construction, major 1,151,036 1,197,586
projects.....................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Strategic Capital Investment Planning.--The Committee is
aware that the Department has recently undertaken a review and
new strategic approach to address the problem of aging
infrastructure in poor condition, underutilized properties,
and/or a lack of sufficient infrastructure. The goal of this
new planning approach is to provide senior decisionmakers with
a 10- to 20-year view of all capital needs based on clearly
stated standards, an assessment of current facilities, and an
analysis of gaps between the standards and the current
condition and location of VA facilities. According to the
Department, this process will drive future major construction,
minor construction and recurring and non-recurring budget
requests. This review is anticipated to be completed in fiscal
year 2011, in order to inform the 2012 budget request. The
Committee believes that such a review should lead to a
comprehensive capital plan with current and future cost
estimates of all capital needs, by fiscal year, similar to the
Department of Defense's Future Years Defense Plan, which helps
define allocation of funding for military construction
projects. Therefore, the Committee directs the Department to
submit with the fiscal year 2012 budget request all findings
associated with this review.
Energy Efficiency.--The Committee recognizes VA's
initiative and accomplishments to date in greening the agency,
and wishes to ensure that VA continues these efforts at a level
that will allow both short- and long-term sustainability goals
to be achieved. The recommendation includes $272,396,000 in
resources for the Green Management Program in fiscal year 2011.
The Committee's desire is to provide green management program
funding--covering renewable energy, energy efficiency,
environmental management, greenhouse gas pollution reduction,
sustainable building, and vehicle fleet management efforts--
sufficient to provide VA the means for continuing achievements
in these areas. Therefore the Committee directs the VA to
submit to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of
Congress, within 60 days of enactment of this act, a ``Greening
VA'' operating plan that addresses all program components. The
plan should include resource levels for all agency components
and administrations for fiscal year 2011.
Assessment of Real Estate Inventory.--The Committee
endorses the administration's recently announced effort to
dispose of unneeded Federal real estate. The Committee wants to
ensure that VA has a comprehensive plan and effort to manage
its portfolio of real estate at an optimal level in support of
serving veterans. VA should use all available tools, including
public-private ventures, to reduce the amount of unneeded
assets. The Committee wants to ensure that all VA mission
requirements, including efforts to provide supportive services
and housing options for homeless veterans, are fully addressed
in VA's plan to reduce unneeded assets. The Committee directs
the Department to provide a report within 60 days of enactment
of this act to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses
of Congress, detailing all surplus and underutilized buildings
within the VA real estate portfolio. The report should include
any recommendation for future use consistent with the VA's
mission, and if appropriate, any plans for disposal of the
facility.
Joint Facilities.--The Department of Defense [DOD] and
Department of Veterans Affairs are currently undertaking a
joint venture in North Chicago, where VA and DOD are
consolidating their medical missions into one integrated
hospital. The Committee has been supportive of this effort and
has provided bill language to allow the VA to transfer money
into a joint account with DOD. Both Departments believe
significant cost savings can be achieved through this effort.
The Committee believes that the VA should develop a strategic
capital plan that addresses future joint ventures with DOD, as
well with other Federal healthcare providers and academic
affiliates. The Committee directs the Department to submit a
joint venture strategic capital plan to the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress by March 25, 2011,
outlining what future collaborative efforts with the DOD, other
Federal providers and academic affiliates are planned. This
plan should include capital cost estimates, the degree to which
integration will occur, and potential cost savings.
CONSTRUCTION, MINOR PROJECTS
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $703,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 467,700,000
Committee recommendation................................ 485,965,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The Construction, minor projects account provides for
constructing, altering, extending, and improving any of the
facilities (including parking) under the jurisdiction or for
the use of the VA, including planning, CARES activities,
assessment of needs, architectural and engineering services,
and site acquisition, where the estimated cost of a project is
equal to or less than $10,000,000. Public Law 106-117, the
Veterans Millennium Health Care and Benefits Act of 1999, gave
the VA the authority to make capital contributions from minor
construction in enhanced-use leases. Proceeds realized from
enhanced-use lease activities may be deposited into the
Construction, major projects and Construction, minor projects
accounts.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $485,965,000 for minor
construction. This is $217,035,000 below the fiscal year 2010
enacted level and $18,265,000 above the budget request.
The Committee has provided an additional $8,265,000 for
construction and renovation needs associated with the hiring of
new claims processors. The recommendation includes $386,977,000
for the Veterans Health Administration, $43,573,000 for the
National Cemetery Administration, $22,625,000 for General
Administration--Staff Offices, and $22,790,000 for the Veterans
Benefits Administration. The Committee directs the Department
to provide an expenditure plan within 30 days of enactment of
this act for the amount appropriated for minor construction.
Family Friendly Homeless Veterans Housing Initiative.--The
recommendation includes an additional $10,000,000 for the VA's
building reuse initiative. This new initiative is a fast-track
process that identifies and evaluates underutilized buildings
in VA's inventory for potential reuse. Once identified,
opportunities will be pursued through either Enhanced Use Lease
agreements, minor construction or a sharing agreement to bring
services, including homeless programs, to veterans in the
quickest manner possible. The review is also identifying
buildings for demolition where land could then be redeveloped
for homeless housing. In fiscal year 2010, the VA utilized a
portion of the $50,000,000 provided by Congress last year for
minor construction needs to serve homeless veterans. These
funds are being used to bring identified buildings up to code
by remediating environmental and safety deficiencies, including
asbestos abatement, enabling reuse development design and
construction to move forward. The Committee directs that the
additional funds included in the recommendation be used for
conversion of surplus or underutilized buildings on VA campuses
for housing homeless veterans and their families, with a
particular emphasis on women veterans as well as veterans at
risk for homelessness. The Committee further directs that a
portion of these funds be used for renovation and construction
at medical centers that serve rural or highly rural
populations. The Department is directed to submit an
expenditure plan for this initiative within 60 days of
enactment of the act, to the Committees on Appropriations of
both Houses of Congress.
GRANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STATE EXTENDED CARE FACILITIES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $100,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 85,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 85,000,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
This account is used to provide grants to assist States in
acquiring or constructing State home facilities for furnishing
domiciliary or nursing home care to veterans, and to expand,
remodel or alter existing buildings for furnishing domiciliary,
nursing home, or hospital care to veterans in State homes. The
grant may not exceed 65 percent of the total cost of the
project. Public Law 102-585 granted permanent authority for
this program, and Public Law 106-117 provided greater
specificity in directing VA to prescribe regulations for the
number of beds for which grant assistance may be furnished.
This program has been a successful partnership between the
States and the VA in meeting the long-term care needs of
elderly veterans for decades.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $85,000,000 for grants for the
construction of State extended care facilities. This is
$15,000,000 below the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal
to the budget request.
Long-term Care.--The Committee is concerned about the VA's
ability to plan for and meet the long-term care needs of
America's veterans. The Committee is aware that the VA has
decreased Community Living Center [CLC] capacity and that 65
percent of patient workload is now being met by community and
State veterans homes. In light of the projected increase in
elderly veterans in future years, additional State veterans
homes will need to be built. However, given the ongoing budget
deficits being experienced by State governments across the
country, the Committee is concerned that the States will be
unable to contribute the requisite 35 percent of total
construction costs needed to obtain Federal matching funds.
Accordingly, the Committee urges the VA to explore alternative
financing mechanisms to ensure that a sufficient number of
State veterans homes are available to meet the needs of future
patients.
Walla Walla State Veterans Home.--The Committee is aware of
the collaborative efforts of the Walla Walla VA Medical Center
and the Washington State Department of Veterans Affairs to meet
the long-term care needs of veterans in southeast Washington
and northern Oregon by building a long-term care facility on
the Walla Walla VA Medical Center grounds. The Committee
supports the creation of a jointly operated veterans home in
Walla Walla, Washington. The establishment of this new veterans
home will complement the expanded Community Based Outpatient
Clinic in Walla Walla offering a variety of specialty services
and providing great value to the adjacent home. The Committee
is also supportive of the development of a tri-state compact
allowing eligible residents in Oregon and Idaho access to the
new State veterans home.
GRANTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF STATE VETERANS CEMETERIES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $46,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 46,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 46,000,000
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Public Law 105-368 amended title 38 U.S.C. 2408 and
established authority to provide aid to States for
establishment, expansion, and improvement of State veterans
cemeteries, which are operated and permanently maintained by
the States. This statutory change increased the maximum Federal
share from 50 percent to 100 percent in order to fund
construction costs and the initial equipment expenses when the
cemetery is established. The States remain responsible for
providing the land and for paying all costs related to the
operation and maintenance of the State cemeteries, including
the costs for subsequent equipment purchases.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $46,000,000 for grants for the
construction of State veterans cemeteries. This is equal to the
fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the budget request.
Administrative Provisions
Sec. 201. The Committee includes a provision which outlines
reprogramming authority and responsibilities for the Veterans
Benefits Administration.
Sec. 202. The Committee includes a provision which outlines
reprogramming authority and responsibilities for the Veterans
Health Administration.
Sec. 203. The Committee includes a provision which outlines
the use of the Salaries and expenses account.
Sec. 204. The Committee includes a provision mandating that
only construction funds may be used for land procurement.
Sec. 205. The Committee includes a provision allowing for
reimbursements to the Medical services account.
Sec. 206. The Committee includes a provision allowing for
payments of prior year obligations.
Sec. 207. The Committee includes a provision which allows
for the use of fiscal year 2010 funds for prior year
obligations.
Sec. 208. The Committee includes a provision which allows
for payments from the National Service Life Insurance Fund.
Sec. 209. The Committee includes a provision which outlines
the use of funds from enhanced-use lease proceeds.
Sec. 210. The Committee includes a provision which provides
for funds for the Office of Resolution Management and the
Office of Employment Discrimination Complaint Adjudication.
Sec. 211. The Committee includes a provision which sets a
limit on new leases without congressional approval.
Sec. 212. The Committee includes a provision which requires
disclosure of third-party reimbursement information.
Sec. 213. The Committee includes a provision which allows
for the transfer of revenue derived from enhanced use leases
into the construction accounts.
Sec. 214. The Committee includes a provision which outlines
authorized uses for medical services funds.
Sec. 215. The Committee includes a provision which allows
funds in the Medical Care Collection Fund to be transferred
into the Medical Services account.
Sec. 216. The Committee includes a provision which allows
eligible veterans in the State of Alaska to obtain medical care
services.
Sec. 217. The Committee includes a provision which allows
for the transfer of funds into the construction accounts.
Sec. 218. The Committee includes a provision which allows
for outreach and marketing to enroll new veterans.
Sec. 219. The Committee includes a provision requiring the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit quarterly financial
reports on the Veterans Health Administration.
Sec. 220. The Committee includes a provision outlining
transfer authority to the information technology systems
account.
Sec. 221. The Committee includes a provision outlining
limits on transfers within the information technology systems
account.
Sec. 222 The Committee includes a provision allowing the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to transfer limited funds to the
Department of Health and Human Services, Graduate Psychology
Education Program.
Sec. 223. The Committee includes a provision prohibiting
any funds to be used to contract out any functions performed by
more than 10 employees without a fair competition process.
Sec. 224. The Committee includes a provision limiting the
amount of nonrecurring maintenance funds that can be obligated
during the last 2 months of the fiscal year.
Sec. 225. The Committee includes a provision rescinding
funds from certain accounts and appropriating additional
amounts with 2-year authority.
Sec. 226. The Committee includes a provision allowing for
the transfer of funds from certain accounts to the Joint
Department of Defense/Department of Veterans Affairs Medical
Facility Demonstration Fund, as authorized by Public Law 111-
84.
Sec. 227. The Committee includes a provision allowing for
the transfer of certain funds deposited in the Medical Care
Collections Fund to the Joint Department of Defense/Department
of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund, as
authorized by Public Law 111-84.
Sec. 228. The Committee includes a provision allowing a
minimum of $15,000,000 to be transferred from Medical services,
Medical support and compliance, and Medical facilities to the
Department of Defense/Department of Veterans Affairs Health
Care Sharing Incentive Fund, as authorized by section 8111 of
title 38, United States Code.
Sec. 229. The Committee includes a provision providing an
additional amount to the General administration account to
increase the Department's acquisition workforce. This provision
was included as title V general provision in the
administration's budget submission. This provision only applies
to the Department of Veterans Affairs; therefore, the Committee
has included it as an administrative provision in title II.
Sec. 230. The Committee includes a provision requiring
notification of all bid savings for major construction
projects.
Sec. 231. The Committee includes a provision for the
construction of a major medical facility.
TITLE III
RELATED AGENCIES
American Battle Monuments Commission
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The American Battle Monuments Commission [ABMC] is
responsible for the following: the maintenance and construction
of U.S. monuments and memorials commemorating the achievements
in battle of our Armed Forces since April 1917 (the date of the
United States entry into World War I); the erection of
monuments and markers by U.S. citizens and organizations in
foreign countries; and the design, construction, and
maintenance of permanent military cemetery memorials in foreign
countries. The Commission maintains 24 military memorial
cemeteries and 31 monuments, memorials, and markers in 15
countries around the world, including three memorials on U.S.
soil.
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $62,675,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 64,200,000
Committee recommendation................................ 67,200,000
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $67,200,000 for the Salaries and
expenses account. This amount is $4,525,000 above the fiscal
year 2010 enacted level and $3,000,000 above the budget
request. The Committee has provided additional funds to support
the expansion of ABMC's interpretive program and for
nonrecurring maintenance needs.
FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $17,100,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 20,200,000
Committee recommendation................................ 20,200,000
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends an estimated $20,200,000 for the
Foreign currency fluctuation account. This amount is $3,100,000
above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and equal to the
budget request.
The Committee has again included language in the
accompanying bill, as proposed by the administration, that
would allow funding for this account on a ``such sums as
necessary'' basis. Funding the account in this manner allows
the Commission to maintain cemeteries regardless of the
volatility of foreign currency fluctuations.
U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
OVERVIEW
The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims was
established by the Veterans' Judicial Review Act of 1988. The
Court is an independent judicial tribunal with exclusive
jurisdiction to review decisions of the Board of Veterans'
Appeals. It has the authority to decide all relevant questions
of law; interpret constitutional, statutory, and regulatory
provisions; and determine the meaning or applicability of the
terms of an action by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. It is
authorized to compel action by the Secretary. It is authorized
to hold unconstitutional or otherwise unlawful and set aside
decisions, findings, conclusions, rules and regulations issued
or adopted by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Board of
Veterans' Appeals, or the Chairman of the Board that are found
to be arbitrary or capricious. The Court's principal office
location is Washington, DC; however, it is a national court,
empowered to sit anywhere in the United States.
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $27,115,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 90,147,000
Committee recommendation................................ 53,297,000
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $53,297,000 for the U.S. Court of
Appeals for Veterans Claims. This amount is an increase of
$26,182,000 above the fiscal year 2010 enacted level and
$36,850,000 below the budget request.
The Committee is aware that beginning in fiscal year 2011,
the Administrative Office of the Courts will no longer provide
support for the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
electronic case management system. Therefore, the
recommendation includes an additional $150,000 for the Court to
hire additional information technology staff to support the
electronic case management system. The administration's budget
request also included $62,000,000, to be transferred to the
General Services Administration [GSA], for the construction of
a new courthouse. The Committee strongly supports construction
of this facility and has provided $25,000,000 as the first
increment in funding. The Committee based this recommendation
on several factors, including the amount of funds that could be
obligated during fiscal year 2011. GSA has indicated that the
final feasibility study will be completed and released to the
Committee by the end of July. Depending on the results of the
study, such as environmental remediation, costs could increase
above the $62,000,000 estimate contained in the budget request.
Department of Defense--Civil
Cemeterial Expenses, Army
OVERVIEW
The Secretary of the Army is responsible for the
administration, operation and maintenance of Arlington National
Cemetery and the Soldiers' and Airmen's Home National Cemetery.
In addition to its principal function as a national cemetery,
Arlington is the site of approximately 3,200 nonfuneral
ceremonies each year and has approximately 4 million visitors
annually.
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $39,850,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 38,100,000
Committee recommendation................................ 43,100,000
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $43,100,000 for the Cemeterial
expenses, Army account. This amount is $3,250,000 above the
fiscal year 2010 enacted level and $5,000,000 above the budget
request.
The Committee is greatly concerned about the shocking
mismanagement of Arlington National Cemetery [ANC] as revealed
in the June 10, 2010, Army Inspector General report. As a
sacred symbol of the sacrifices that America's military forces
have made for this Nation since the Civil War, Arlington
Cemetery must be held to the highest standards. Clearly, those
standards have not been met for many years. The Committee
welcomes the Army's swift actions to address the systemic
failures identified in the report through the establishment of
a new position of Executive Director for the cemetery, the
appointment by the Department of Veterans Affairs [VA] of an
interim Superintendent, and the creation of an independent Army
National Cemeteries Advisory Commission, led by former Senator
and World War II veteran Bob Dole and former Senator, Vietnam
veteran, and current Secretary of the American Battle Monuments
Commission Max Cleland. The Committee also commends the
dedication of the Arlington National Cemetery workforce, which
has carried out its responsibilities with professionalism and
attentiveness to the families of America's war heroes and
veterans under extraordinarily trying circumstances.
The Committee also welcomes the aggressive schedule that
the new ANC management team has set to identify and correct
deficiencies in the operation and management of the cemetery,
including a lack of established policies and procedures, a
failure to automate recordkeeping, and the misidentification of
hundreds of gravesites at the cemetery. The Committee urges ANC
to also examine cemeterial operations at the Soldiers' and
Airmen's Home National Cemetery in Washington, DC, which ANC
also operates, and provide recommendations for operational and
management improvements if needed. Until the full scope of the
deficiencies at Arlington Cemetery has been identified and ANC
submits a comprehensive plan for corrective action, the
Committee is reluctant to prescribe any policy changes.
However, the Committee has provided an additional $5,000,000
for cemetery operations for fiscal year 2011 to enable ANC to
implement urgently needed management improvements, including
the hiring of additional staff if needed and the automation of
the cemetery's recordkeeping system. The Committee also
encourages ANC to draw from the VA's expertise in cemeterial
management, and to determine the feasibility of adapting the
VA's automated recordkeeping information technology system,
which is a proven system available immediately, for use at the
national cemeteries.
The Committee directs ANC to provide to the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress an expenditure plan
for the additional funds prior to obligation. The Committee
also directs ANC to provide quarterly reports, beginning with
the first quarter after enactment of this act, on the steps it
is taking to correct deficiencies at the national cemeteries,
funding requirements to implement those measures, and a
progress report on the status of automating ANC's
recordkeeping. Beginning with the submission of the fiscal year
2012 budget request, the Committee directs ANC to provide a
breakdown by category (e.g., salaries, operation and
maintenance, and information technology) of its budget request,
and the amount of funding that is intended to be obligated
within the fiscal year.
Armed Forces Retirement Home
TRUST FUND
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $134,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 71,200,000
Committee recommendation................................ 71,200,000
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends authority to expend $71,200,000
from the Armed Forces Retirement Home [AFRH] Trust Fund to
operate and maintain the Armed Forces Retirement Home--
Washington, DC, and the Armed Forces Retirement Home--Gulfport,
Mississippi. This amount is $62,800,000 below the fiscal year
2010 enacted level for the Trust Fund and equal to the budget
request.
TITLE IV
OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
OVERVIEW
The President's fiscal year 2011 overseas contingency
operations [OCO] request for military construction totals
$1,257,002,000 to support the realignment of U.S. forces into
and within Afghanistan. The request includes funding for
operational facilities, roads and bridges, utility
infrastructure, force protection, logistics and support
facilities, and environmental mitigation projects such as
incinerators. The Committee recognizes the importance of
providing adequate expeditionary facilities for U.S. combat
forces in Afghanistan and supports the policy of the Department
of Defense to carry out the minimum construction necessary to
support operations and provide force protection.
Military Construction, Army
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $924,484,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 929,996,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,045,676,000
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $1,045,676,000 for Army overseas
contingency operations construction for fiscal year 2011. This
amount is $115,680,000 above the budget request. The Committee
notes that a number of Army OCO projects for which funding was
requested in the fiscal year 2011 budget submission have either
been accelerated or cancelled, and has therefore deleted
funding for those projects and substituted other projects in
Afghanistan requested by the administration in the regular
fiscal year 2011 budget request or by the Army in updated OCO
project requests.
The Committee understands that changing strategic
requirements on the ground and the cancellation or acceleration
of funding for certain projects can alter the details of the
OCO military construction budget request. The Committee has
endeavored to accommodate those changes identified by the
services, and thus the list of OCO military construction
projects included in the table at the end of this report
reflects both the original budget request and the updated
requirements identified by the services. The Committee believes
that all military construction in Afghanistan is related to the
war effort, and has also shifted funding for military
construction in Afghanistan that was included in the regular
budget request to the OCO Committee recommendation.
The Committee recognizes the evolving nature of military
construction needs in a war zone, and to give the services more
flexibility to meet unforeseen operational requirements has
included an additional $20,000,000 in unspecified minor
construction funding for both the Army and the Air Force. For
the past several years, the Department has sought to raise the
spending limit on the use of operation and maintenance funds
for unspecified minor military construction from $750,000 to
$1,500,000 (or $3,000,000 for projects to correct a life,
safety, or health deficiency) when used for projects in support
of a contingency, such as the war in Afghanistan. The Committee
believes that, to the extent possible, military construction
projects should be funded within military construction accounts
and subject to military construction authorities and oversight.
The intent of the unspecified minor construction account is to
give the services the flexibility to fund construction projects
up to $2,000,000, or $3,000,000 to meet life, safety or health
requirements, without the requirement to seek prior
authorization. The Committee further urges the Department and
the services to program adequate funding for OCO unspecified
minor construction in future budget submissions to provide the
degree of flexibility needed to respond to emerging wartime
requirements.
Military Construction, Air Force
Appropriations, 2010.................................... $474,500,000
Budget estimate, 2011................................... 280,506,000
Committee recommendation................................ 164,826,000
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $164,826,000 for Air Force
overseas contingency operations construction for fiscal year
2011, $115,680,000 below the budget request. Within this
amount, the Committee has adjusted funding for specific
projects to reflect accelerations, cancellations, or cost
changes.
Military Construction, Defense-Wide
Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011................................... $46,500,000
Committee recommendation................................ 46,500,000
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $46,500,000 for Defense-Wide
overseas contingency operations construction for fiscal year
2011, equal to the President's budget request.
Administrative Provision
Sec. 401. The Committee includes a provision regarding
funding for this title.
TITLE V
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 501. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits
the obligation of funds beyond the current fiscal year unless
expressly so provided.
Sec. 502. The Committee includes a provision that requires
pay raises to be absorbed within the levels appropriated.
Sec. 503. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits
the use of funds for programs, projects or activities not in
compliance with Federal law relating to risk assessment, the
protection of private property rights, or unfunded mandates.
Sec. 504. The Committee includes a provision that prohibits
the use of funds to support or defeat legislation pending
before Congress.
Sec. 505. The Committee includes a provision that
encourages the expansion of E-commerce technologies and
procedures.
Sec. 506. The Committee includes a provision that limits
funds from being transferred from this appropriations measure
to any instrumentality of the United States Government without
authority from an appropriations act.
Sec. 507. The Committee includes a provision that specifies
the congressional committees that are to receive all reports
and notifications.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports
accompanying general appropriations bills identify each
recommended amendment which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session. The Committee is
filing an original bill, which is not covered under this rule,
but reports this information in the spirit of full disclosure.
The Committee recommends funding for the following programs
which currently lack authorization:
Title I: Department of Defense
Military Construction, Army
Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps
Military Construction, Air Force
Military Construction, Defense-Wide
Military Construction, Army National Guard
Military Construction, Air National Guard
Military Construction, Army Reserve
Military Construction, Navy Reserve
Military Construction, Air Force Reserve
North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Security Investment
Program
Family Housing Construction, Army
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Army
Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Navy and Marine
Corps
Family Housing Construction, Air Force
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Air Force
Family Housing Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide
Department of Defense, Family Housing Improvement Fund
Homeowners Assistance Fund
Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense-Wide
Base Realignment and Closure Account, 1990
Base Realignment and Closure Account, 2005
Title II: Department of Veterans Affairs
Veterans Health Administration
National Cemetery Administration
Departmental Administration
Title III: Related Agencies
American Battle Monuments Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Cemeterial Expenses, Army
Armed Forces Retirement Home
Title IV: Overseas Contingency Operations
Military Construction, Army
Military Construction, Air Force
Military Construction, Defense-Wide
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 15, 2010,
the Committee ordered reported en bloc an original bill (S.
3606) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development,
Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for
the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, and for other
purposes; an original bill (S. 3607) making appropriations for
the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2011 and for other purposes; and an original bill
(S. 3615) making appropriations military construction, the
Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, and for other purposes,
with each subject to amendment and subject to the Committee
Spending Guidance, and authorized the chairman of the committee
or the chairman of the subcommittee to offer the text of the
Senate-reported bill as a committee amendment in the nature of
a substitute to the House companion measure, by a recorded vote
of 17-12, a quorum being present. The vote was as follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairman Inouye Mr. Cochran
Mr. Leahy Mr. Bond
Mr. Harkin Mr. McConnell
Ms. Mikulski Mr. Shelby
Mr. Kohl Mr. Gregg
Mrs. Murray Mr. Bennett
Mr. Dorgan Mrs. Hutchison
Mrs. Feinstein Mr. Brownback
Mr. Durbin Mr. Alexander
Mr. Johnson Ms. Collins
Ms. Landrieu Mr. Voinovich
Mr. Reed Ms. Murkowski
Mr. Lautenberg
Mr. Nelson
Mr. Pryor
Mr. Tester
Mr. Specter
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the committee.''
The Committee bill as recommended contains no such
provisions.
BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
-----------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
guidance\1\ bill guidance\1\ bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee Spending
Guidance to its subcommittees for 2011: Subcommittee on
Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related
Agencies:
Mandatory............................................. NA 69,297 NA \2\69,050
Discretionary......................................... NA 77,253 NA \2\80,961
General purpose................................... 75,996 75,996 NA NA
Overseas deployment............................... 1,258 1,257 NA NA
Projection of outlays associated with the recommendation:
2011.................................................. ............ ........... ............ \3\73,529
2012.................................................. ............ ........... ............ 10,030
2013.................................................. ............ ........... ............ 6,895
2014.................................................. ............ ........... ............ 2,761
2015 and future years................................. ............ ........... ............ 1,929
Financial assistance to State and local governments for NA 201 NA 49
2011.....................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There is no section 302(a) allocation to the Commitee for fiscal year 2011.
\2\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\3\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
NA: Not applicable.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
recommendation
Installation and project Budget estimate Committee compared with
recommendation budget estimate
(+ or -)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
ARMY:
FORT RUCKER:
AVIATION COMPONENT MAINTENANCE SHOP.................. 29,000 29,000 ...............
AVIATION MAINTENANCE FACILITY........................ 36,000 36,000 ...............
TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................. 4,650 4,650 ...............
NAVY:
MOBILE:
T-6 SOLO CAPABLE OUTLYING LANDING FIELD.............. 29,082 29,082 ...............
AIR FORCE:
MAXWELL AFB:
ADAL AIR UNIVERSITY LIBRARY.......................... 13,400 13,400 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
FORT MCCLELLAN:
LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE................................ ............... 5,635 +5,635
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
MONTGOMERY REGIONAL AIRPORT ANGB:
FUEL CELL AND CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR............... 7,472 7,472 ...............
REPLACE SQUAD OPS FACILITY........................... ............... 7,500 +7,500
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALABAMA..................................... 119,604 132,739 +13,135
ALASKA
ARMY:
FORT GREELY:
FIRE STATION......................................... 26,000 26,000 ...............
FORT RICHARDSON:
BRIGADE COMPLEX, PH 1................................ 67,038 67,038 ...............
MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE....................... 12,200 12,200 ...............
SIMULATIONS CENTER................................... 34,000 34,000 ...............
FORT WAINWRIGHT:
AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 1 INCR 2............. 30,000 ............... -30,000
AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 2A INC 1 (HANGAR)... 142,650 92,650 -50,000
AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 2B [COF]............. 27,000 27,000 ...............
URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................................. 3,350 3,350 ...............
AIR FORCE:
EIELSON AFB:
REPAIR CENTRAL HEAT PLANT AND POWER PLANT BOILERS.... 28,000 28,000 ...............
ELMENDORF AFB:
ADD/ALTER ASOS TRAINING FACILITY..................... 4,749 4,749 ...............
CONSTRUCT RAILHEAD OPERATIONS FACILITY............... 15,000 15,000 ...............
DOD JOINT REGIONAL FIRE TRAINING FACILITY............ ............... 6,600 +6,600
F-22 ADAL WEAPONS RELEASE SYSTEMS SHOP & AME......... 10,525 10,525 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE:
ADD/ALTER COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY.................... ............... 6,500 +6,500
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALASKA...................................... 400,512 333,612 -66,900
ARIZONA
NAVY:
YUMA:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR.......................... 63,280 63,280 ...............
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR.......................... 40,600 40,600 ...............
COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADE................ 63,730 63,730 ...............
INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY FACILITY........... 21,480 21,480 ...............
SIMULATOR FACILITY................................... 36,060 36,060 ...............
UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES.................... 44,320 44,320 ...............
VAN PAD COMPLEX RELOCATION........................... 15,590 15,590 ...............
AIR FORCE:
DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB:
AMARG HANGAR......................................... 25,000 25,000 ...............
HC-130 AGE MAINTENANCE FACILITY...................... 4,600 4,600 ...............
HC-130J AERIAL CARGO FACILITY........................ 10,700 10,700 ...............
HC-130J PARTS STORE.................................. 8,200 8,200 ...............
FORT HUACHUCA:
TFI--PREDATOR LRE BEDDOWN............................ 11,000 11,000 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
YUMA:
SOF MILITARY FREE FALL SIMULATOR..................... 8,977 8,977 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
FLORENCE:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 16,500 16,500 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB:
TFI--PREDATOR FOC--ACTIVE DUTY ASSOCIATE............. 4,650 4,650 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARIZONA..................................... 374,687 374,687 ...............
ARKANSAS
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP ROBINSON:
COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP.................... 30,000 30,000 ...............
FORT CHAFFEE:
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY........... 19,000 19,000 ...............
CONVOY LIVE FIRE/ENTRY CONTROL POINT RANGE........... ............... 3,500 +3,500
LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE................................ 2,500 2,500 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE:
FUEL CELL AND CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR............... ............... 10,400 +10,400
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARKANSAS.................................... 51,500 65,400 +13,900
CALIFORNIA
ARMY:
PRESIDIO MONTEREY:
ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS................ 63,000 63,000 ...............
GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING......................... 39,000 39,000 ...............
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY.................... 38,000 38,000 ...............
NAVY:
CAMP PENDLETON:
BEQ--13 AREA......................................... 42,864 42,864 ...............
BEQ--LAS FLORES...................................... 37,020 37,020 ...............
CNATT/FRS--AVIATION TRAINING AND BEQ................. 66,110 66,110 ...............
CONVEYANCE/WATER TREATMENT........................... 100,700 100,700 ...............
MALS-39 MAINTENANCE HANGAR EXPANSION................. 48,230 48,230 ...............
MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE....................... 9,950 9,950 ...............
NORTH REGION TERT TREAT PLANT, INCR 2................ 30,000 30,000 ...............
SMALL ARMS MAGAZINE--EDSON RANGE..................... 3,760 3,760 ...............
TRUCK COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX..................... 53,490 53,490 ...............
CORONADO:
ROTARY HANGAR........................................ 67,160 67,160 ...............
MIRAMAR:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR.......................... 90,490 90,490 ...............
HANGAR 4............................................. 33,620 33,620 ...............
PARKING APRON/TAXIWAY EXPANSION...................... 66,500 66,500 ...............
SAN DIEGO:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, HOMEPORT ASHORE.......... 75,342 75,342 ...............
BERTHING PIER 12 REPL & DREDGING, PHASE 1............ 108,414 108,414 ...............
MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE....................... 9,950 9,950 ...............
TWENTYNINE PALMS:
BEQ AND PARKING STRUCTURE............................ 53,158 53,158 ...............
AIR FORCE:
EDWARDS AFB:
FLIGHTLINE FIRE STATION.............................. ............... 15,500 +15,500
DEFENSE-WIDE:
POINT LOMA ANNEX:
REPLACE STORAGE FACILITY, INCR 3..................... 20,000 20,000 ...............
POINT MUGU:
AIRCRAFT DIRECT FUELING STATION...................... 3,100 3,100 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP ROBERTS:
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY........... 19,000 19,000 ...............
ARMY RESERVE:
FAIRFIELD:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER.................................. 26,000 26,000 ...............
FORT HUNTER LIGGETT:
ECS TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITY.......... 22,000 22,000 ...............
ECS WAREHOUSE........................................ 15,000 15,000 ...............
GRENADE LAUNCHER RANGE............................... 1,400 1,400 ...............
HAND GRENADE FAMILIARIZATION RANGE (LIVE)............ 1,400 1,400 ...............
LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE............................... 2,700 2,700 ...............
TACTICAL VEHICLE WASH RACK........................... 9,500 9,500 ...............
NAVY RESERVE:
TWENTYNINE PALMS:
TANK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY.................... 5,991 5,991 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CALIFORNIA.................................. 1,162,849 1,178,349 +15,500
COLORADO
ARMY:
FORT CARSON:
AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE.................... 3,650 3,650 ...............
BATTALION HEADQUARTERS............................... 6,700 6,700 ...............
BRIGADE COMPLEX...................................... 56,000 56,000 ...............
SIMULATIONS CENTER................................... 40,000 40,000 ...............
AIR FORCE:
BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE:
LAND ACQUISITION..................................... ............... 10,000 +10,000
SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS FACILITY.................. 12,160 12,160 ...............
PETERSON AFB:
RAIDRS SPACE CONTROL FACILITY........................ 24,800 24,800 ...............
U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY:
CENTER FOR CHARACTER & LEADERSHIP DEVELOP- MENT..... 27,600 27,600 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT CARSON:
SOF TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE HANGAR.......... 3,717 3,717 ...............
CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE:
PUEBLO DEPOT:
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY, PH XII......... 65,569 65,569 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
COLORADO SPRINGS:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 20,000 20,000 ...............
FORT CARSON:
REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE.......................... 40,000 40,000 ...............
GYPSUM:
HIGH ALTITUDE SUPPORT FACILITY....................... 39,000 39,000 ...............
WINDSOR:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 7,500 7,500 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COLORADO.................................... 346,696 356,696 +10,000
CONNECTICUT
NAVY:
NSB NEW LONDON:
SUBMARINE GROUP TWO HEADQUARTERS..................... ............... 12,930 +12,930
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
WINDSOR LOCKS:
READINESS CENTER (AVIATION).......................... 41,000 41,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CONNECTICUT................................. 41,000 53,930 +12,930
DELAWARE
AIR FORCE:
DOVER AFB:
C-5M/C-17 MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY, PH 2........ 3,200 3,200 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
NEW CASTLE:
ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER [JFHQ]................... 27,000 27,000 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
NEW CASTLE COUNTY AIRPORT:
C-130 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SHOPS, PH 3............... ............... 8,700 +8,700
JOINT FORCES OPERATIONS CENTER-ANG SHARE............. 1,500 1,500 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DELAWARE.................................... 31,700 40,400 +8,700
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AIR FORCE:
BOLLING AFB:
JOINT AIR DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER.................. 13,200 13,200 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE:
REPLACE PARKING STRUCTURE, PHASE 1................... 3,000 3,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA........................ 16,200 16,200 ...............
FLORIDA
ARMY:
EGLIN AFB:
CHAPEL............................................... 6,900 6,900 ...............
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY (HOMESTEAD AFB):
COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY......................... 41,000 41,000 ...............
U.S. ARMY GARRISON MIAMI:
COMMISSARY........................................... 19,000 ............... -19,000
NAVY:
BLOUNT ISLAND MCSF:
CONSOLIDATED WAREHOUSE FACILITY...................... 17,260 17,260 ...............
CONTAINER STAGING AND LOADING LOT.................... 5,990 5,990 ...............
CONTAINER STORAGE LOT................................ 4,910 4,910 ...............
HARDSTAND EXTENSION.................................. 17,930 17,930 ...............
PAINT AND BLAST FACILITY............................. 18,840 18,840 ...............
WASHRACK EXPANSION................................... 9,690 9,690 ...............
NSA PANAMA CITY:
LAND ACQUISITION (9 ACRES)........................... ............... 5,960 +5,960
TAMPA:
JCSE VEHICLE PAINT FACILITY.......................... 2,300 2,300 ...............
AIR FORCE:
EGLIN AFB:
F-35 FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE HANGAR.................... 11,400 11,400 ...............
HURLBURT FIELD:
ADAL SPECIAL OPERATIONS SCHOOL FACILITY.............. 6,170 6,170 ...............
ADD TO VISITING QUARTERS (24 RM)..................... 4,500 4,500 ...............
BASE LOGISTICS FACILITY.............................. 24,000 24,000 ...............
PATRICK AFB:
AIR FORCE TECHNICAL APPLICATION CENTER INC 1......... 158,009 100,009 -58,000
RELOCATE MAIN GATE................................... ............... 8,000 +8,000
DEFENSE-WIDE:
EGLIN AFB:
SOF GROUND SUPPORT BATTALION DETACHMENT.............. 6,030 6,030 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
JACKSONVILLE IAP:
SECURITY FORCES TRAINING FACILITY.................... 6,700 6,700 ...............
ARMY RESERVE:
MIAMI:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 13,800 13,800 ...............
ORLANDO:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 10,200 10,200 ...............
WEST PALM BEACH:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 10,400 10,400 ...............
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
PATRICK AFB:
WEAPONS MAINTENANCE FACILITY......................... 3,420 3,420 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FLORIDA..................................... 398,449 335,409 -63,040
GEORGIA
ARMY:
FORT BENNING:
LAND ACQUISITION..................................... 12,200 12,200 ...............
MUSEUM OPERATIONS SUPPORT BUILDING................... 32,000 ............... -32,000
TRAINEE BARRACKS PH 2................................ 51,000 51,000 ...............
TRAINING BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 2..................... 14,600 14,600 ...............
TRAINING BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 2..................... 14,600 14,600 ...............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP............................. 53,000 53,000 ...............
FORT GORDON:
QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE......................... ............... 8,100 +8,100
TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................. 4,150 4,150 ...............
FORT STEWART:
AUTOMATED INFANTRY PLATOON BATTLE COURSE............. 6,200 6,200 ...............
AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE............. 9,100 9,100 ...............
AVIATION UNIT OPERATIONS COMPLEX..................... 47,000 47,000 ...............
BATTALION COMPLEX.................................... 18,000 18,000 ...............
GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING......................... 8,200 8,200 ...............
MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE........................... 3,750 3,750 ...............
SIMULATIONS CENTER................................... 26,000 26,000 ...............
TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................. 7,000 7,000 ...............
NAVY:
KINGS BAY:
SECURITY ENCLAVE & VEHICLE BARRIERS.................. 45,004 45,004 ...............
WATERFRONT EMERGENCY POWER........................... 15,660 15,660 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
AUGUSTA:
NSA/CSS GEORGIA TRAINING FACILITY.................... 12,855 12,855 ...............
FORT BENNING:
DEXTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONSTRUCT GYM............... 2,800 2,800 ...............
SOF COMPANY SUPPORT FACILITY......................... 20,441 20,441 ...............
SOF MWD KENNEL COMPLEX............................... 3,624 3,624 ...............
FORT STEWART:
HEALTH CLINIC ADDTION/ALTERATION..................... 35,100 35,100 ...............
HUNTER ANGS:
FUEL UNLOAD FACILITY................................. 2,400 2,400 ...............
HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD:
SOF TEMF EXPANSION................................... 3,318 3,318 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CUMMING:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 17,000 17,000 ...............
DOBBINS ARB:
READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT............................. 10,400 10,400 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
SAVANNAH/HILTON HEAD IAP:
RELOCATE ASOS FACILITY............................... 7,450 7,450 ...............
ARMY RESERVE:
MACON:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 11,400 11,400 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GEORGIA..................................... 494,252 470,352 -23,900
HAWAII
ARMY:
FORT SHAFTER:
COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY, PH 1................... 58,000 58,000 ...............
FLOOD MITIGATION..................................... 23,000 23,000 ...............
SCHOFIELD BARRACKS:
BARRACKS............................................. 98,000 98,000 ...............
BARRACKS............................................. 90,000 90,000 ...............
TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................. 24,000 24,000 ...............
TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER:
BARRACKS............................................. 28,000 28,000 ...............
NAVY:
CAMP SMITH:
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER.............................. 29,960 29,960 ...............
KANEOHE BAY:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS........................... 90,530 90,530 ...............
WATERFRONT OPERATIONS FACILITY....................... 19,130 19,130 ...............
PACIFIC MISSILE RANGE FACILITY:
CONSTRUCT PRE-FABRICATED BRIDGE AT NOHILI DITCH..... ............... 3,560 +3,560
REPLACE NORTH LOOP ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.... ............... 9,100 +9,100
PEARL HARBOR:
CENTER FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT/HUMANITARIAN:
ASSISTANCE....................................... 9,140 9,140 ...............
FIRE STATION, WEST LOCH.............................. ............... 9,084 +9,084
WELDING SCHOOL SHOP CONSOLIDATION.................... ............... 8,500 +8,500
JOINT POW/MIA ACCOUNTING COMMAND..................... 99,328 99,328 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
HICKAM AFB:
ALTER FUEL STORAGE TANKS............................. 8,500 8,500 ...............
PEARL HARBOR:
NSWG3 COMMAND AND OPERATIONS FACILITY................ 28,804 28,804 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
KALAELOA:
COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP.................... 38,000 38,000 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
HICKAM AFB:
TFI--F-22 BEDDOWN INTRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT............. 5,950 5,950 ...............
TFI--F-22 HANGAR, SQUADRON OPERATIONS AND AMU........ 48,250 48,250 ...............
TFI--F-22 UPGRADE MUNITIONS COMPLEX.................. 17,250 17,250 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, HAWAII...................................... 715,842 746,086 +30,244
IDAHO
DEFENSE-WIDE:
MOUNTAIN HOME AFB:
REPLACE POL FUEL STORAGE TANKS....................... 27,500 27,500 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
GOWEN FIELD:
BARRACKS [ORTC] PH 1................................. 17,500 17,500 ...............
MOUNTAIN HOME:
TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY........... 6,300 6,300 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, IDAHO....................................... 51,300 51,300 ...............
ILLINOIS
DEFENSE-WIDE:
SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE:
FIELD COMMAND FACILITY UPGRADE....................... 1,388 1,388 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
SPRINGFIELD:
COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ADD/ALT............ 15,000 15,000 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
CAPITAL MAP:
TFI--CNAF BEDDOWN--UPGRADE FACILITIES................ 16,700 16,700 ...............
ARMY RESERVE:
QUINCY:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 12,200 12,200 ...............
ROCKFORD USARC:
UNITED STATES ARMY RESERVE CENTER.................... ............... 13,200 +13,200
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ILLINOIS.................................... 45,288 58,488 +13,200
INDIANA
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
HULMAN REGIONAL AIRPORT:
TFI--ASOS BEDDOWN--UPGRADE FACILITIES................ 4,100 4,100 ...............
ARMY RESERVE:
MICHIGAN CITY:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 15,500 15,500 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, INDIANA..................................... 19,600 19,600 ...............
IOWA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP DODGE:
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY........... ............... 5,700 +5,700
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
DES MOINES:
CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR............................. ............... 4,700 +4,700
ARMY RESERVE:
DES MOINES:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER.................................. 8,175 8,175 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, IOWA........................................ 8,175 18,575 +10,400
KANSAS
ARMY:
FORT LEAVENWORTH:
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP............................. 7,100 7,100 ...............
FORT RILEY:
AUTOMATED INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE............... 4,100 4,100 ...............
AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION/TRAINING RANGE............... 14,800 14,800 ...............
BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 1.............................. 31,000 31,000 ...............
KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE................................. 7,200 7,200 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
FORBES FIELD:
TAXIWAY ALTERATIONS.................................. ............... 9,036 +9,036
WICHITA:
FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP............................... 24,000 24,000 ...............
READINESS CENTER..................................... 43,000 43,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, KANSAS...................................... 131,200 140,236 +9,036
KENTUCKY
ARMY:
FORT CAMPBELL:
AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE.................... 1,500 1,500 ...............
BRIGADE COMPLEX...................................... 67,000 67,000 ...............
COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES........................ 25,000 25,000 ...............
INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE......................... ............... 3,000 +3,000
RAPPELLING TRAINING AREA............................. 5,600 5,600 ...............
SHOOT HOUSE.......................................... ............... 3,300 +3,300
UNIT OPERATIONS FACILITIES........................... 26,000 26,000 ...............
URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................................. 3,300 3,300 ...............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP............................. 15,500 15,500 ...............
FORT KNOX:
ACCESS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS......................... 6,000 6,000 ...............
MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY.................... 12,800 12,800 ...............
RAIL HEAD UPGRADE.................................... ............... 18,000 +18,000
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT CAMPBELL:
LANDGRAF HANGAR ADDITION, 160TH SOAR................. ............... 3,600 +3,600
SOF BATTALION OPS COMPLEX............................ 38,095 38,095 ...............
CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE:
BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT:
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION PH XI.................... 59,402 59,402 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
BURLINGTON:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 19,500 19,500 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, KENTUCKY.................................... 279,697 307,597 +27,900
LOUISIANA
ARMY:
FORT POLK:
BARRACKS............................................. 29,000 29,000 ...............
EMERGENCY SERVICES CENTER............................ ............... 9,200 +9,200
HEAVY SNIPER RANGE................................... 4,250 4,250 ...............
LAND ACQUISITION..................................... 6,000 6,000 ...............
LAND ACQUISITION..................................... 24,000 24,000 ...............
AIR FORCE:
BARKSDALE AFB:
WEAPONS LOAD CREW TRAINING FACILITY.................. 18,140 18,140 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
FORT POLK:
TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY........... 5,500 5,500 ...............
MINDEN:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 28,000 28,000 ...............
NAVY RESERVE:
NEW ORLEANS:
JOINT AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITY................... 16,281 16,281 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, LOUISIANA................................... 131,171 140,371 +9,200
MAINE
NAVY:
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD:
CONSOLIDATION OF STRUCTURAL SHOPS.................... ............... 17,240 +17,240
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MAINE....................................... ............... 17,240 +17,240
MARYLAND
ARMY:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:
AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION FACILITY, PH 2...... 14,600 14,600 ...............
FORT MEADE:
INDOOR FIRING RANGE.................................. 7,600 7,600 ...............
WIDEBAND SATCOM OPERATIONS CENTER.................... 25,000 25,000 ...............
NAVY:
INDIAN HEAD:
AGILE CHEMICAL FACILITY, PHASE 2..................... 34,238 34,238 ...............
ADVANCED ENERGETICS RESEARCH LAB COMPLEX, PH 2...... ............... 12,810 +12,810
PATUXENT RIVER:
BROAD AREA MARITIME SURVEILLANCE T & E FACILITY...... 42,211 42,211 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:
USAMRICD REPLACEMENT, INC 3.......................... 105,000 105,000 ...............
ANDREWS AFB:
REPLACE FUEL STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION FACILITY......... 14,000 14,000 ...............
BETHESDA NAVAL HOSPITAL:
NNMC PARKING EXPANSION............................... 17,100 17,100 ...............
TRANSIENT WOUNDED WARRIOR LODGING.................... 62,900 62,900 ...............
FORT DETRICK:
CONSOLIDATED LOGISTICS FACILITY...................... 23,100 23,100 ...............
INFORMATION SERVICES FACILITY EXPANSION.............. 4,300 4,300 ...............
NIBC SECURITY FENCING AND EQUIPMENT.................. 2,700 2,700 ...............
SUPPLEMENTAL WATER STORAGE........................... 3,700 3,700 ...............
USAMRIID STAGE I, INC 5.............................. 17,400 17,400 ...............
WATER TREATMENT PLANT REPAIR & SUPPLEMENT............ 11,900 11,900 ...............
FORT MEADE:
NORTH CAMPUS UTILITY PLANT........................... 219,360 219,360 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
ST. INIGOES (WEBSTER FIELD):
TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY........... 5,500 5,500 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
MARTIN STATE AIRPORT:
REPLACE OPS AND MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY............ 11,400 11,400 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MARYLAND.................................... 622,009 634,819 +12,810
MASSACHUSETTS
DEFENSE-WIDE:
HANSCOM AFB:
MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC ADDITION........................ 2,900 2,900 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
HANSCOM AFB:
ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER [JFHQ] PH 2.............. 23,000 23,000 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
BARNES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT:
ADDITIONS AND RENOVATIONS TO BUILDING 15............. ............... 6,000 +6,000
ARMY RESERVE:
DEVENS RESERVE FORCES TRAINING AREA:
AUTOMATED RECORD FIRE RANGE.......................... 4,700 4,700 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS............................... 30,600 36,600 +6,000
MICHIGAN
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP GRAYLING RANGE:
BARRACKS REPLACEMENT, PH 2........................... ............... 17,102 +17,102
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY........... 19,000 19,000 ...............
LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE............................... ............... 1,595 +1,595
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
ALPENA COMBAT READINESS TRAINING CENTER:
REPLACE TROOP QUARTERS............................... ............... 9,600 +9,600
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MICHIGAN.................................... 19,000 47,297 +28,297
MINNESOTA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
ARDEN HILLS:
FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP............................... 29,000 29,000 ...............
CAMP RIPLEY:
INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE......................... 4,300 4,300 ...............
TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY........... 4,450 4,450 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MINNESOTA................................... 37,750 37,750 ...............
MISSISSIPPI
NAVY:
NCBC GULFPORT:
BRANCH HEALTH CLINIC................................. ............... 11,870 +11,870
DEFENSE-WIDE:
STENNIS SPACE CENTER:
SOF WESTERN MANEUVER AREA, PH 2...................... ............... 9,000 +9,000
SOF WESTERN MANEUVER AREA, PH 3...................... ............... 8,000 +8,000
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI................................. ............... 28,870 +28,870
MISSOURI
ARMY:
FORT LEONARD WOOD:
BARRACKS............................................. 29,000 29,000 ...............
BRIGADE HEADQUARTERS................................. 12,200 12,200 ...............
GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING......................... 7,000 7,000 ...............
INFORMATION SYSTEMS FACILITY......................... 15,500 15,500 ...............
TRAINING BARRACKS.................................... 19,000 19,000 ...............
TRANSIENT ADVANCED TRAINEE BARRACKS, PH 2............ 29,000 29,000 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
FORT LEONARD WOOD:
REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, PH 1.................... ............... 13,800 +13,800
ARMY RESERVE:
KANSAS CITY:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER.................................. 11,800 11,800 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSOURI.................................... 123,500 137,300 +13,800
MONTANA
AIR FORCE:
MALMSTROM AFB:
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER, PH 2........................ ............... 8,000 +8,000
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MONTANA..................................... ............... 8,000 +8,000
NEBRASKA
AIR FORCE:
OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE:
KENNEY/BELLEVUE GATES................................ ............... 11,000 +11,000
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
LINCOLN:
READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT............................. 3,300 3,300 ...............
MEAD:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 11,400 11,400 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEBRASKA.................................... 14,700 25,700 +11,000
NEVADA
AIR FORCE:
CREECH AFB:
UAS AIRFIELD FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION............... 11,710 11,710 ...............
NELLIS AFB:
COMMUNICATION NETWORK CONTROL CENTER................. ............... 11,400 +11,400
F-35 ADAL 422 TEST EVALUATION SQUADRON FACILITY...... 7,870 7,870 ...............
F-35 ADAL FLIGHT TEST INSTRUMENTATION FACILITY....... 1,900 1,900 ...............
F-35 FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY....................... 13,110 13,110 ...............
F-35 MAINTENANCE HANGAR/AMU.......................... 28,760 28,760 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
LAS VEGAS ARNG:
FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP............................... ............... 22,998 +22,998
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEVADA...................................... 63,350 97,748 +34,398
NEW HAMPSHIRE
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
PEMBROKE:
BARRACKS FACILITY (REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE)...... 15,000 15,000 ...............
CLASSROOM FACILITY (REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE)..... 21,000 21,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW HAMPSHIRE............................... 36,000 36,000 ...............
NEW JERSEY
AIR FORCE:
MCGUIRE AFB:
BASE OPS/COMMAND POST FACILITY [TFI]................. 8,000 8,000 ...............
DORMITORY (120 RM)................................... 18,440 18,440 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
ATLANTIC CITY IAP:
FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE DOCK AND CORROSION CONTROL..... ............... 8,500 +8,500
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW JERSEY................................ 26,440 34,940 +8,500
NEW MEXICO
ARMY:
WHITE SANDS:
BARRACKS............................................. 29,000 29,000 ...............
AIR FORCE:
CANNON AFB:
DORMITORY (96 RM).................................... 14,000 14,000 ...............
FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER................................ ............... 4,050 +4,050
UAS SQUADRON OPS FACILITY............................ 20,000 20,000 ...............
HOLLOMAN AFB:
UAS ADD/ALTER MAINTENANCE HANGAR..................... 15,470 15,470 ...............
UAS MAINTENANCE HANGAR............................... 22,500 22,500 ...............
KIRTLAND AFB:
AERIAL DELIVERY FACILITY ADDITION.................... 3,800 3,800 ...............
ARMAMENT SHOP........................................ 6,460 6,460 ...............
H/MC-130 FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE FACILITY............ 14,142 14,142 ...............
MILITARY WORKING DOG FACILITY........................ ............... 4,400 +4,400
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CANNON AFB:
SOF ADD/ALT SIMULATOR FACILITY FOR MC-130............ 13,287 13,287 ...............
SOF AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON (MC-130J)................. 12,636 12,636 ...............
SOF C-130 PARKING APRON PHASE I...................... 26,006 26,006 ...............
SOF HANGAR/AMU (MC-130J)............................. 24,622 24,622 ...............
SOF OPERATIONS AND TRAINING COMPLEX.................. 39,674 39,674 ...............
WHITE SANDS:
HEALTH AND DENTAL CLINICS............................ 22,900 22,900 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
FARMINGTON:
READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT............................. 8,500 8,500 ...............
ARMY RESERVE:
LAS CRUCES:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 11,400 11,400 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW MEXICO.................................. 284,397 292,847 +8,450
NEW YORK
ARMY:
FORT DRUM:
AIRCRAFT FUEL STORAGE COMPLEX........................ 14,600 14,600 ...............
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR.......................... 16,500 16,500 ...............
BATTALION COMPLEX.................................... 61,000 61,000 ...............
BRIGADE COMPLEX PH 1................................. 55,000 55,000 ...............
CONSTRUCT RAILHEAD LOADING AREA...................... ............... 7,600 +7,600
INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE......................... 8,200 8,200 ...............
TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................. 18,500 18,500 ...............
TRANSIENT TRAINING BARRACKS.......................... 55,000 55,000 ...............
U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY:
SCIENCE FACILITY, PH 2............................... 130,624 130,624 ...............
URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................................. 1,700 1,700 ...............
AIR FORCE:
FORT DRUM:
20TH AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON COMPLEX......... 20,440 20,440 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY:
WEST POINT MS ADD/ALT................................ 27,960 27,960 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
FORT DRUM:
TFI--REAPER INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT................... 2,500 2,500 ...............
STEWART IAP:
BASE DEFENSE GROUP BEDDOWN........................... 14,250 14,250 ...............
ARMY RESERVE:
BINGHAMTON:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 13,400 13,400 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW YORK.................................... 439,674 447,274 +7,600
NORTH CAROLINA
ARMY:
FORT BRAGG:
BATTALION COMPLEX.................................... 33,000 33,000 ...............
BRIGADE COMPLEX...................................... 50,000 50,000 ...............
BRIGADE COMPLEX...................................... 25,000 25,000 ...............
BRIGADE COMPLEX...................................... 41,000 41,000 ...............
COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY......................... 53,000 53,000 ...............
COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES........................ 12,600 12,600 ...............
DINING FACILITY...................................... 11,200 11,200 ...............
MURCHISON ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION.............. 17,000 17,000 ...............
STAGING AREA COMPLEX................................. 14,600 14,600 ...............
STUDENT BARRACKS..................................... 18,000 18,000 ...............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP............................. 28,000 28,000 ...............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP............................. 7,500 7,500 ...............
NAVY:
CAMP LEJEUNE:
2ND INTEL BN MAINTENANCE/OPS COMPLEX................. 90,270 90,270 ...............
ARMORY--II MEF--WALLACE CREEK........................ 12,280 12,280 ...............
BEQ--CAMP JOHNSON.................................... 46,550 46,550 ...............
BEQ--COURTHOUSE BAY.................................. 42,330 42,330 ...............
BEQ--COURTHOUSE BAY.................................. 40,780 40,780 ...............
BEQ--FRENCH CREEK.................................... 43,640 43,640 ...............
BEQ--RIFLE RANGE..................................... 55,350 55,350 ...............
BEQ--WALLACE CREEK................................... 51,660 51,660 ...............
BEQ--WALLACE CREEK NORTH............................. 46,290 46,290 ...............
EOD ADDITION--2ND MARINE LOGISTICS GROUP............. 7,420 7,420 ...............
HANGAR............................................... 73,010 73,010 ...............
MAINTENANCE HANGAR [HMLA]............................ 74,260 74,260 ...............
MAINTENANCE/OPS COMPLEX--2ND ANGLICO................. 36,100 36,100 ...............
MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE....................... 9,950 9,950 ...............
MESS HALL--FRENCH CREEK.............................. 25,960 25,960 ...............
MESS HALL ADDITION--COURTHOUSE BAY................... 2,553 2,553 ...............
MOTOR TRANSPORTATION/COMM MAINTENANCE FACIL- ITY.... 18,470 18,470 ...............
UTILITY EXPANSION--FRENCH CREEK...................... 56,050 56,050 ...............
UTILITY EXPANSION--HADNOT POINT...................... 56,470 56,470 ...............
CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION:
BEQ.................................................. 42,500 42,500 ...............
MARINERS BAY LAND ACQUISITION--BOGUE................. 3,790 3,790 ...............
MISSILE MAGAZINE..................................... 13,420 13,420 ...............
STATION INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES...................... 5,800 5,800 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CAMP LEJEUNE:
TARAWA TERRACE I ES REPLACE SCHOOL................... 16,646 16,646 ...............
FORT BRAGG:
MCNAIR ES--REPLACE SCHOOL............................ 23,086 23,086 ...............
MURRAY ES REPLACE SCHOOL............................. 22,000 22,000 ...............
SOF ADMIN/COMPANY OPERATIONS......................... 10,347 10,347 ...............
SOF BAFFLE CONTAINMENT FOR RANGE 19C................. ............... 7,200 +7,200
SOF C4 FACILITY--JSOC................................ 41,000 41,000 ...............
SOF JOINT INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE FACILITY.............. 32,000 32,000 ...............
SOF MEDICAL CLINIC ADDITION.......................... ............... 3,889 +3,889
SOF OPERATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY.............. 11,000 11,000 ...............
SOF OPERATIONS ADDITIONS............................. 15,795 15,795 ...............
SOF OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY...................... 13,465 13,465 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
HIGH POINT:
READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT............................. 1,551 1,551 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
STANLY COUNTY AIRPORT:
UPGRADE ASOS FACILITIES.............................. 2,000 2,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA.............................. 1,354,693 1,365,782 +11,089
NORTH DAKOTA
AIR FORCE:
GRAND FORKS AFB:
CENTRAL DEPLOYMENT CENTER............................ ............... 16,500 +16,500
MINOT AFB:
CONTROL TOWER/BASE OPERATIONS FACILITY............... 18,770 18,770 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP GRAFTON:
READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT............................. 11,200 11,200 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH DAKOTA................................ 29,970 46,470 +16,500
OHIO
DEFENSE-WIDE:
COLUMBUS:
REPLACE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY....................... 7,400 7,400 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
TOLEDO AIRPORT:
REPLACE SECURITY FORCES COMPLEX...................... ............... 7,300 +7,300
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OHIO........................................ 7,400 14,700 +7,300
OKLAHOMA
ARMY:
FORT SILL:
GENERAL PURPOSE STORAGE BUILDING..................... 13,800 13,800 ...............
MUSEUM OPERATIONS SUPPORT BUILDING................... 12,800 ............... -12,800
MCALESTER:
IGLOO STORAGE, DEPOT LEVEL........................... 3,000 3,000 ...............
AIR FORCE:
TINKER AFB:
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER............................ ............... 9,300 +9,300
UPGRADE BUILDING 3001 INFRASTRUCTURE, PH III......... 14,000 14,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OKLAHOMA.................................... 43,600 40,100 -3,500
OREGON
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
KINGSLEY FIELD ANG BASE, KLAMATH FALLS:
REPLACE FIRE STATION................................. ............... 7,000 +7,000
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OREGON...................................... ............... 7,000 +7,000
PENNSYLVANIA
NAVY:
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MECHANICSBURG (PHILADELPHIA
ANNEX):
NORTH GATE SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS..................... ............... 5,930 +5,930
QUIET PROPULSION LOAD HOUSE.......................... ............... 7,630 +7,630
DEFENSE-WIDE:
NEW CUMBERLAND:
REPLACE HEADQUARTERS FACILITY........................ 96,000 96,000 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
STATE COLLEGE ANGS:
ADD/ALT AOS FACILITY................................. 4,100 4,100 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA................................ 100,100 113,660 +13,560
RHODE ISLAND
NAVY:
NEWPORT:
ELECTROMAGNETIC SENSOR FACILITY...................... 27,007 27,007 ...............
GATE IMPROVEMENTS.................................... ............... 4,950 +4,950
SUBMARINE PAYLOADS INTEGRATION LABORATORY............ ............... 12,170 +12,170
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
EAST GREENWICH:
UNITED STATES PROPERTY AND FISCAL OFFICE............. 27,000 27,000 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
QUONSET STATE AIRPORT:
C-130 PARKING APRON.................................. ............... 1,800 +1,800
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RHODE ISLAND................................ 54,007 72,927 +18,920
SOUTH CAROLINA
ARMY:
FORT JACKSON:
TRAINEE BARRACKS..................................... 28,000 28,000 ...............
TRAINEE BARRACKS COMPLEX, PH 1....................... 46,000 46,000 ...............
TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................. 17,000 17,000 ...............
NAVY:
BEAUFORT:
AICUZ LAND ACQUISITION............................... 21,190 21,190 ...............
AIRCRAFT HANGAR--VMFAT--502.......................... 46,550 46,550 ...............
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER.............................. 15,430 15,430 ...............
TRAINING AND SIMULATOR FACILITY...................... 46,240 46,240 ...............
AIR FORCE:
CHARLESTON AFB:
CIVIL ENGINEER COMPLEX [TFI]--PHASE 1................ 15,000 15,000 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
MCENTIRE JRB:
JOINT DEPLOYMENT PROCESSING AND READINESS CENTER..... ............... 9,100 +9,100
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA............................ 235,410 244,510 +9,100
SOUTH DAKOTA
AIR FORCE:
ELLSWORTH AFB:
MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY........................ ............... 12,400 +12,400
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
JOE FOSS FIELD:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE SHOPS........................... ............... 12,800 +12,800
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
WATERTOWN:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 25,000 25,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA................................ 25,000 50,200 +25,200
TENNESSEE
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
MCGHEE TYSON ANG BASE:
HOBBS ROAD ACQUISITION............................... ............... 6,500 +6,500
NASHVILLE IAP:
TFI--RENOVATE INTEL SQUADRON FACILITIES.............. 5,500 5,500 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TENNESSEE................................... 5,500 12,000 +6,500
TEXAS
ARMY:
FORT BLISS:
AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE............. 6,700 6,700 ...............
COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES........................ 18,500 18,500 ...............
DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING RANGE.................. 22,000 22,000 ...............
HEAVY SNIPER RANGE................................... 3,500 3,500 ...............
INDOOR SWIMMING POOL................................. 15,500 15,500 ...............
LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE............................... 2,100 2,100 ...............
LIVE FIRE EXERCISE SHOOTHOUSE........................ 3,150 3,150 ...............
SCOUT/RECCE GUNNERY COMPLEX.......................... 15,500 15,500 ...............
SQUAD DEFENSE RANGE.................................. 3,000 3,000 ...............
THAAD BATTERY COMPLEX................................ 17,500 17,500 ...............
TRANSIENT TRAINING COMPLEX........................... 31,000 31,000 ...............
URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................................. 2,800 2,800 ...............
VEHICLE BRIDGE OVERPASS.............................. 8,700 8,700 ...............
FORT HOOD:
BATTALION COMPLEX.................................... 40,000 40,000 ...............
BRIGADE COMPLEX...................................... 38,000 38,000 ...............
COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES........................ 4,300 4,300 ...............
CONVOY LIVE FIRE..................................... 3,200 3,200 ...............
LIVE FIRE EXERCISE SHOOTHOUSE........................ 2,100 2,100 ...............
UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM [UAS] HANGAR.................. 55,000 55,000 ...............
URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................................. 2,450 2,450 ...............
FORT SAM HOUSTON:
SIMULATIONS CENTER................................... 16,000 16,000 ...............
TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................. 6,200 6,200 ...............
AIR FORCE:
DYESS AFB:
C-130J ADD/ALTER FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY........... 4,080 4,080 ...............
ELLINGTON FIELD:
TFI--UPGRADE UAV MAINTENANCE HANGAR.................. 7,000 7,000 ...............
LACKLAND AFB:
BMT SATELLITE CLASSROOM/DINING FACILITY NO. 2........ 32,000 32,000 ...............
ONE-COMPANY FIRE STATION............................. 5,500 5,500 ...............
RECRUIT DORMITORY, PHASE 3........................... 67,980 67,980 ...............
RECRUIT/FAMILY INPROCESSING & INFO CENTER............ 21,800 21,800 ...............
RANDOLPH AFB:
FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION............................ ............... 13,000 +13,000
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT BLISS:
HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT INCR 2.......................... 147,100 147,100 ...............
LACKLAND AFB:
AMBULATORY CARE CENTER PHASE 2 INC 1................. 162,500 120,000 -42,500
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP MAXEY:
COMBAT PISTOL/MILITARY PISTOL QUALIFICATION C........ 2,500 2,500 ...............
CAMP SWIFT:
URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................................. 2,600 2,600 ...............
ARMY RESERVE:
DALLAS:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 12,600 12,600 ...............
FORT HOOD:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER.................................. ............... 15,500 +15,500
RIO GRANDE:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 6,100 6,100 ...............
SAN MARCOS:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 8,500 8,500 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TEXAS....................................... 797,460 783,460 -14,000
UTAH
AIR FORCE:
HILL AFB:
CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES, PH 1......... ............... 7,300 +7,300
F-22 T-10 ENGINE TEST CELL........................... 2,800 2,800 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CAMP WILLIAMS:
CNCI DATA CENTER INCREMENT 3......................... 398,358 398,358 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, UTAH........................................ 401,158 408,458 +7,300
VERMONT
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT:
UPGRADE TAXIWAYS AND REPLACE ARM/DISARM PADS, PH 1... ............... 11,000 +11,000
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, VERMONT................................... ............... 11,000 +11,000
VIRGINIA
ARMY:
FORT A.P. HILL:
1200 METER RANGE..................................... 14,500 14,500 ...............
INDOOR FIRING RANGE.................................. 6,200 6,200 ...............
KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE................................. 3,800 3,800 ...............
LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE............................... 4,100 4,100 ...............
MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY.................... 65,000 65,000 ...............
FORT EUSTIS:
WARRIOR IN TRANSITION COMPLEX........................ 18,000 18,000 ...............
FORT LEE:
AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE............... 7,700 7,700 ...............
COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITY.......................... 4,900 4,900 ...............
MUSEUM OPERATIONS SUPPORT BUILDING................... 30,000 ............... -30,000
TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................. 5,800 5,800 ...............
NAVY:
DAHLGREN NSCW:
MISSILE SUPPORT FACILITY REPLACEMENT, PH 1........... ............... 9,730 +9,730
NORFOLK:
PIER 1 UPGRADES TO BERTH USNS COMFORT................ 10,035 10,035 ...............
PIERS 9 AND 10 UPGRADES FOR DDG 1000................. 2,400 2,400 ...............
PORTSMOUTH:
SHIP REPAIR PIER REPLACEMENT, INCR 2................. 100,000 100,000 ...............
QUANTICO:
ACADEMIC FACILITY ADDITION--SNCOA.................... 12,080 12,080 ...............
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS--WTBN..................... 37,810 37,810 ...............
RESEARCH CENTER ADDITION--MCU........................ 37,920 37,920 ...............
STUDENT OFFICER QUARTERS--TBS........................ 55,822 55,822 ...............
AIR FORCE:
LANGLEY AFB:
F-22 ADD/ALTER HANGAR BAY LO/CR FACILITY--TFI........ 8,800 8,800 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CRANEY ISLAND:
REPLACE FUEL PIER.................................... 58,000 58,000 ...............
FORT BELVOIR:
DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT............................ 6,300 6,300 ...............
PENTAGON:
PENTAGON METRO AND CORRIDOR 8 SCREENING FACILITY..... 6,473 6,473 ...............
POWER PLANT MODERNIZATION PHASE 3.................... 51,928 51,928 ...............
SECURE ACCESS LANE--REMOTE VEHICLE SCREENING......... 4,923 4,923 ...............
QUANTICO:
NEW CONSOLIDATED ELEMETARY SCHOOL.................... 47,355 47,355 ...............
ARMY RESERVE:
FORT A.P. HILL:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER.................................. 15,500 15,500 ...............
ROANOKE:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................. 14,800 14,800 ...............
VIRGINIA BEACH:
ARMY RESERVE CENTER.................................. 11,000 11,000 ...............
NAVY RESERVE:
WILLIAMSBURG:
NAVY ORDNANCE CARGO LOGISTICS TRAINING COM- PLEX.... 21,346 21,346 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, VIRGINIA.................................. 662,492 642,222 -20,270
WASHINGTON
ARMY:
FORT LEWIS:
BARRACKS............................................. 47,000 47,000 ...............
BARRACKS COMPLEX..................................... 40,000 40,000 ...............
RAPPELLING TRAINING AREA............................. 5,300 5,300 ...............
REGIONAL LOGISTIC SPT COMPLEX WAREHOUSE.............. 16,500 16,500 ...............
REGIONAL LOGISTIC SUPPORT COMPLEX.................... 63,000 63,000 ...............
YAKIMA:
SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE.............................. 3,750 3,750 ...............
NAVY:
BANGOR:
CSDS-5 LABORATORY EXPANSION PHASE 1.................. 16,170 16,170 ...............
LIMITED AREA EMERGENCY POWER......................... 15,810 15,810 ...............
WATERFRONT RESTRICTED AREA EMERGENCY POWER........... 24,913 24,913 ...............
BREMERTON:
LIMITED AREA PRODUCT/STRG CMPLX, INCR 7.............. 19,116 19,116 ...............
AIR FORCE:
FAIRCHILD AFB:
PRECISION MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT LABORATORY FACILITY.. ............... 4,850 +4,850
MCCHORD AFB:
COLLOCATED CHAPEL/FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER, PH 1........ ............... 10,400 +10,400
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT LEWIS:
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE FACILITY......................... 8,400 8,400 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
TACOMA:
COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP.................... 25,000 25,000 ...............
NAVY RESERVE:
YAKIMA:
MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER.......................... 13,844 13,844 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WASHINGTON.................................. 298,803 314,053 +15,250
WEST VIRGINIA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
MOOREFIELD:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 14,200 14,200 ...............
MORGANTOWN:
READINESS CENTER..................................... 21,000 21,000 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
YEAGER AIRBASE:
COMMUNICATIONS TRAINING FACILITY..................... ............... 6,250 +6,250
FORCE PROTECTION/ANTITERRORISM....................... ............... 13,000 +13,000
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA............................... 35,200 54,450 +19,250
WISCONSIN
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
MADISON:
AIRCRAFT PARKING..................................... 5,700 5,700 ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
GENERAL MITCHELL IAP:
REPLACE FIRE STATION................................. ............... 8,300 +8,300
ARMY RESERVE:
FORT MCCOY:
AT/MOB BILLETING COMPLEX PHASE I..................... 9,800 9,800 ...............
NCO ACADEMY PHASE II................................. 10,000 10,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WISCONSIN................................... 25,500 33,800 +8,300
WYOMING
AIR FORCE:
CAMP GUERNSEY:
NUCLEAR/SPACE SECURITY TACTICS TRAINING CENTER....... 4,650 4,650 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
LARAMIE:
FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP............................... 14,400 14,400 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WYOMING..................................... 19,050 19,050 ...............
AFGHANISTAN
ARMY:
BAGRAM AIR BASE:
ARMY AVIATION HQ FACILITIES.......................... 19,000 ............... -19,000
BARRACKS............................................. 18,000 ............... -18,000
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNITY SUPPORT AREA.................. 14,800 ............... -14,800
EASTSIDE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION..................... 10,400 ............... -10,400
EASTSIDE UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE.................... 29,000 ............... -29,000
ENTRY CONTROL POINT.................................. 7,500 ............... -7,500
JOINT DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER...................... 2,800 ............... -2,800
AIR FORCE:
BAGRAM AIR BASE:
CONSOLIDATED RIGGING FACILITY........................ 9,900 ............... -9,900
FIGHTER HANGAR....................................... 16,480 ............... -16,480
MEDEVAC RAMP EXPANSION/FIRE STATION.................. 16,580 ............... -16,580
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, AFGHANISTAN................................. 144,460 ............... -144,460
BAHRAIN ISLAND
NAVY:
BAHRAIN NSA:
NAVCENT AMMUNITION MAGAZINES......................... 89,280 89,280 ...............
OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT FACILITIES.................... 60,002 60,002 ...............
WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, PHASE 3...................... 63,871 63,871 ...............
AIR FORCE:
SHAIKH ISA AB:
NORTH APRON EXPANSION................................ 45,000 45,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BAHRAIN ISLAND.............................. 258,153 258,153 ...............
BELGIUM
DEFENSE-WIDE:
BRUSSELS:
NATO HEADQUARTERS FACILITY........................... 31,863 31,863 ...............
REPLACE SHAPE MS/HS.................................. 67,311 67,311 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BELGIUM..................................... 99,174 99,174 ...............
DJIBOUTI
NAVY:
CAMP LEMONIER:
CAMP LEMONIER HQ FACILITY............................ 12,407 12,407 ...............
GENERAL WAREHOUSE.................................... 7,324 7,324 ...............
HORN OF AFRICA JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER/HQ............ 28,076 ............... -28,076
PAVE EXTERNAL ROADS.................................. 3,824 3,824 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DJIBOUTI.................................... 51,631 23,555 -28,076
GERMANY
ARMY:
ANSBACH:
PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER.............................. 13,800 13,800 ...............
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP............................. 18,000 18,000 ...............
GRAFENWOEHR:
BARRACKS............................................. 17,500 17,500 ...............
BARRACKS............................................. 19,000 19,000 ...............
BARRACKS............................................. 20,000 20,000 ...............
BARRACKS............................................. 19,000 19,000 ...............
RHINE ORDNANCE BARRACKS:
BARRACKS COMPLEX..................................... 35,000 35,000 ...............
SEMBACH AB:
CONFINEMENT FACILITY................................. 9,100 9,100 ...............
WIESBADEN AB:
COMMAND AND BATTLE CENTER, INCR 2.................... 59,500 59,500 ...............
CONSTRUCT NEW ACP.................................... 5,100 5,100 ...............
INFORMATION PROCESSING CENTER........................ 30,400 30,400 ...............
SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION FACILITY......... 91,000 45,500 -45,500
AIR FORCE:
KAPAUN:
DORMITORY (128 RM)................................... 19,600 19,600 ...............
RAMSTEIN AB:
CONSTRUCT C-130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY........... 8,800 8,800 ...............
DEICING FLUID STORAGE & DISPENSING FACILITY.......... 2,754 2,754 ...............
UAS SATCOM RELAY PADS & FACILITY..................... 10,800 10,800 ...............
VILSECK:
AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON [ASOS] COM- PLEX.... 12,900 12,900 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
KATTERBACH:
HEALTH/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT..................... 37,100 37,100 ...............
PANZER KASERNE:
REPLACE BOEBLINGEN HS................................ 48,968 48,968 ...............
VILSECK:
HEALTH CLINIC ADD/ALT................................ 34,800 34,800 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GERMANY..................................... 513,122 467,622 -45,500
GUAM
NAVY:
GUAM:
AAFB NORTH RAMP PARKING (PHASE 1, INC 2)............. 93,588 ............... -93,588
AAFB NORTH RAMP UTILITIES (PHASE 1, INC 2)........... 79,350 ............... -79,350
APRA HARBOR WHARVES IMP (PHASE 1, INC)............... 40,000 40,000 ...............
DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS..................... 66,730 66,730 ...............
FINEGAYAN SITE PREP AND UTILITIES.................... 147,210 ............... -147,210
AIR FORCE:
ANDERSEN AFB:
GUAM STRIKE OPS GROUP & TANKER TASK FORCE:
RENOVATION....................................... 9,100 9,100 ...............
GUAM STRIKE SOUTH RAMP UTILITIES, PHASE 1............ 12,200 12,200 ...............
PRTC--COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS FACIL- ITY... 9,200 9,200 ...............
PRTC--RED HORSE HEADQUARTERS/ENGINEERING FACILITY.... 8,000 8,000 ...............
PRTC--COMMANDO WARRIOR OPEN BAY STUDENT BARRACKS..... 11,800 11,800 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
AGANA NAVAL AIR STATION:
HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT, INCR 2......................... 70,000 70,000 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
BARRIGADA:
COMBINED SUPPORT MAINT SHOP PH 1..................... 19,000 19,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GUAM........................................ 566,178 246,030 -320,148
HONDURAS
ARMY:
SOTO CANO AB:
BARRACKS............................................. 20,400 ............... -20,400
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, HONDURAS.................................... 20,400 ............... -20,400
ITALY
ARMY:
VICENZA:
BDE COMPLEX--BARRACKS/COMMUNITY, INCR 4.............. 26,000 26,000 ...............
BDE COMPLEX--OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY, INCR 4.... 25,000 25,000 ...............
AIR FORCE:
AVIANO AB:
AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON [ASOS] FACILITY...... 10,200 10,200 ...............
DORMITORY (144 RM)................................... 19,000 19,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ITALY....................................... 80,200 80,200 ...............
JAPAN
NAVY:
ATSUGI:
MH-60R/S TRAINER FACILITY............................ 6,908 6,908 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
KADENA AB:
INSTALL FUEL FILTERS-SEPARATORS...................... 3,000 3,000 ...............
MISAWA AB:
HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM.................................. 31,000 ............... -31,000
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, JAPAN....................................... 40,908 9,908 -31,000
KOREA
ARMY:
CAMP WALKER:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM UPGRADE & NATURAL GAS SYS- TEM.... 19,500 19,500 ...............
AIR FORCE:
KUNSAN AB:
DMT FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY........................ 7,500 7,500 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CAMP CARROLL:
HEALTH/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT..................... 19,500 ............... -19,500
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, KOREA....................................... 46,500 27,000 -19,500
PUERTO RICO
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT BUCHANAN:
ANTILLES ES/IS--REPLACE SCHOOL....................... 58,708 58,708 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP SANTIAGO:
LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE................................ 3,100 3,100 ...............
MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE....................... 9,200 9,200 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PUERTO RICO................................. 71,008 71,008 ...............
QATAR
AIR FORCE:
AL UDEID:
BLATCHFORD-PRESTON COMPLEX PH III.................... 62,300 62,300 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
AL UDEID:
NSA WAREHOUSE........................................ 1,961 1,961 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, QATAR....................................... 64,261 64,261 ...............
SPAIN
NAVY:
ROTA:
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER............................ 23,190 23,190 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPAIN....................................... 23,190 23,190 ...............
UNITED KINGDOM
AIR FORCE:
RAF MILDENHALL:
EXTEND TAXIWAY ALPHA................................. 15,000 15,000 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
MENWITH HILL STATION:
MHS PSC CONSTRUCTION--GENERATORS 10 & 11............. 2,000 2,000 ...............
RAF MILDENHALL:
REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM............. 15,900 15,900 ...............
RAF ALCONBURY:
ALCONBURY ES REPLACEMENT............................. 30,308 30,308 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM.............................. 63,208 63,208 ...............
VIRGIN ISLANDS
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
ST. CROIX:
READINESS CENTER [JFHQ].............................. 25,000 25,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, VIRGIN ISLANDS.............................. 25,000 25,000 ...............
NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM............................. 258,884 258,884 ...............
WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED
ARMY:
HOST NATION SUPPORT...................................... 28,000 28,000 ...............
PLANNING AND DESIGN...................................... 221,636 230,308 +8,672
MINOR CONSTRUCTION....................................... 23,000 25,051 +2,051
NAVY:
PLANNING AND DESIGN...................................... 120,050 124,148 +4,098
MINOR CONSTRUCTION....................................... 20,877 22,357 +1,480
AIR FORCE:
PLANNING AND DESIGN...................................... 66,336 77,182 +10,846
MINOR CONSTRUCTION....................................... 18,000 22,717 +4,717
F-35 ACADEMIC TRAINING CENTER............................ 54,150 54,150 ...............
F-35 SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY........................ 10,260 10,260 ...............
F-35 FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY........................... 12,190 12,190 ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION................................. 10,000 10,000 ...............
ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM................... 120,000 290,000 +170,000
PLANNING AND DESIGN:
DEFENSE LEVEL ACTIVITIES............................. 54,221 54,221 ...............
DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE............................. 1,988 1,988 ...............
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENT EDUCATION............ 79,763 79,763 ...............
ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM............... ............... 10,000 +10,000
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY............................. 28,239 28,239 ...............
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND........................... 30,836 35,686 +4,850
TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY.......................... 230,300 230,300 ...............
WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICE...................... 6,270 6,270 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, PLANNING AND DESIGN...................... 431,617 446,467 +14,850
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION:
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY............................. 5,258 5,258 ...............
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENT EDUCATION............ 13,841 13,841 ...............
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF................................ 8,210 8,210 ...............
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND........................... 7,663 7,663 ...............
TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY.......................... 4,884 4,884 ...............
DEFENSE LEVEL ACTIVITIES............................. 3,000 3,000 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION........... 42,856 42,856 ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
PLANNING AND DESIGN...................................... 25,663 35,876 +10,213
MINOR CONSTRUCTION....................................... 11,400 28,229 +16,829
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
PLANNING AND DESIGN...................................... 9,214 22,732 +13,518
MINOR CONSTRUCTION....................................... 8,000 10,000 +2,000
ARMY RESERVE:
PLANNING AND DESIGN...................................... 25,900 26,941 +1,041
MINOR CONSTRUCTION....................................... 3,000 3,000 ...............
NAVY RESERVE:
PLANNING AND DESIGN...................................... 1,857 1,857 ...............
MINOR CONSTRUCTION....................................... 2,238 2,238 ...............
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
PLANNING AND DESIGN...................................... 1,653 1,653 ...............
MINOR CONSTRUCTION....................................... 2,759 7,759 +5,000
FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY
ALASKA:
FORT WAINWRIGHT:
FAMILY HOUSING REPLACEMENT (110 UNITS)............... 21,000 21,000 ...............
GERMANY:
BAUMHOLDER:
FAMILY HOUSING REPLACEMENT (64 UNITS)................ 34,329 34,329 ...............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS.................................... 35,000 35,000 ...............
PLANNING AND DESIGN.......................................... 2,040 2,040 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION................................. 92,369 92,369 ...............
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
UTILITIES ACCOUNT........................................ 69,655 69,655 ...............
SERVICES ACCOUNT......................................... 15,372 15,372 ...............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT....................................... 49,222 49,222 ...............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT.................................... 1,201 1,201 ...............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT...................................... 31,548 31,548 ...............
LEASING.................................................. 203,184 203,184 ...............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY............................. 120,899 120,899 ...............
PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS.............................. 27,059 27,059 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.................... 518,140 518,140 ...............
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS
GUANTANAMO:
NAVAL STATION GUANTANAMO:
REPLACE GTMO HOUSING (71 UNITS)...................... 37,169 37,169 ...............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS.................................... 146,020 146,020 ...............
PLANNING AND DESIGN.......................................... 3,255 3,255 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION................................. 186,444 186,444 ...............
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
UTILITIES ACCOUNT........................................ 59,919 59,919 ...............
SERVICES ACCOUNT......................................... 16,790 16,790 ...............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT....................................... 63,551 63,551 ...............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT.................................... 464 464 ...............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT...................................... 14,478 14,478 ...............
LEASING.................................................. 97,484 97,484 ...............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY............................. 87,134 87,134 ...............
PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS.............................. 26,526 26,526 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.................... 366,346 366,346 ...............
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS.................................... 73,800 73,800 ...............
PLANNING AND DESIGN.......................................... 4,225 4,225 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION................................. 78,025 78,025 ...............
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
UTILITIES ACCOUNT........................................ 89,245 89,245 ...............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT....................................... 54,633 54,633 ...............
SERVICES ACCOUNT......................................... 21,535 21,535 ...............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT...................................... 35,399 35,399 ...............
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT.................................... 1,710 1,710 ...............
LEASING.................................................. 95,671 95,671 ...............
MAINTENANCE.............................................. 161,696 161,696 ...............
PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS.............................. 53,903 53,903 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.................... 513,792 513,792 ...............
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY:
UTILITIES............................................ 10 10 ...............
FURNISHINGS.......................................... 50 50 ...............
LEASING.............................................. 10,293 10,293 ...............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY......................... 70 70 ...............
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY:
FURNISHINGS.......................................... 4,501 4,501 ...............
LEASING.............................................. 34,124 34,124 ...............
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY:
UTILITIES............................................ 297 297 ...............
FURNISHINGS.......................................... 18 18 ...............
SERVICES............................................. 29 29 ...............
MANAGEMENT........................................... 365 365 ...............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY......................... 707 707 ...............
--------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE................ 50,464 50,464 ...............
DOD FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND.......................... 1,096 1,096 ...............
HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM................................ 16,515 16,515 ...............
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, 1990................... 360,474 360,474 ...............
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, 2005................... 2,354,285 2,354,285 ...............
RECAP
ARMY......................................................... 4,078,798 3,797,521 -281,277
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS........................................ 3,879,104 3,667,922 -211,182
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
AIR FORCE.................................................... 1,311,385 1,378,688 +67,303
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
DEFENSE-WIDE................................................. 3,118,062 3,241,601 +123,539
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD.......................................... 873,664 980,072 +106,408
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD........................................... 176,986 337,454 +160,468
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
ARMY RESERVE................................................. 318,175 347,916 +29,741
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
NAVY RESERVE................................................. 61,557 61,557 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
AIR FORCE RESERVE............................................ 7,832 12,832 +5,000
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
NATO......................................................... 258,884 258,884 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE......... 124,971 124,971 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
DOD FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND.......................... 1,096 1,096 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM................................ 16,515 16,515 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY......................................... 610,509 610,509 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS........................ 552,790 552,790 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE.................................... 591,817 591,817 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE................................. 50,464 50,464 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
BRAC......................................................... 2,714,759 2,714,759 ...............
RESCISSION............................................... ............... ............... ...............
==================================================
GRAND TOTAL............................................
18,747,368 18,747,368 ...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee Committee
Budget request recommendation versus request
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFGHANISTAN
ARMY:
AIRBORNE:
ROTARY WING PARKING..................................... 1,200 .............. -1,200
BAGRAM AIR BASE:
ARMY AVIATION HQ FACILITIES............................. .............. 19,000 +19,000
BARRACKS................................................ .............. 18,000 +18,000
COMMAND & CONTROL FACILITY.............................. 13,600 13,600 ..............
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNITY SUPPORT AREA..................... .............. 14,800 +14,800
DFIP DETAINEE HOUSING................................... 23,000 .............. -23,000
DINING FACILITY......................................... 2,650 6,000 +3,350
EASTSIDE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION........................ .............. 10,400 +10,400
EASTSIDE UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE....................... .............. 29,000 +29,000
ENTRY CONTROL POINT..................................... .............. 7,500 +7,500
JOINT DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER......................... .............. 2,800 +2,800
C-IED TASK FORCE COMPOUND............................... 24,000 24,000 ..............
MP HQ................................................... 2,800 5,580 +2,780
REPLACE TEMPORARY GUARD TOWERS.......................... 5,500 6,000 +500
ROLE III HOSPITAL....................................... 35,000 42,000 +7,000
TANKER TRUCK OFF-LOAD FACILITY.......................... 5,700 .............. -5,700
TASK FORCE FREEDOM COMPOUND............................. 18,000 18,000 ..............
TROOP HOUSING, PH 4..................................... 23,000 23,000 ..............
TROOP HOUSING, PH 5..................................... 29,000 29,000 ..............
TROOP HOUSING, PH 6..................................... 29,000 29,000 ..............
TROOP HOUSING, PH 7..................................... 29,000 29,000 ..............
TROOP HOUSING, PH 8..................................... 29,000 29,000 ..............
VET CLINIC & KENNEL..................................... 2,600 2,600 ..............
DWYER:
COMMAND & CONTROL FACILITY.............................. 5,200 5,200 ..............
DINING FACILITY......................................... 6,000 9,000 +3,000
ROTARY WING APRON....................................... 44,000 44,000 ..............
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY........................... 16,000 16,000 ..............
FRONTENAC:
WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPLEX................................ 4,200 4,200 ..............
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY........................... 4,200 4,200 ..............
JALALABAD:
ROTARY WING PARKING..................................... 1,100 .............. -1,100
KANDAHAR:
NORTH AREA UTILITIES, PH 2.............................. 21,000 .............. -21,000
SOF JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER............................. 6,000 6,000 ..............
TROOP HOUSING, PH 4..................................... 20,000 20,000 ..............
TROOP HOUSING, PH 5..................................... 20,000 20,000 ..............
TROOP HOUSING, PH 6..................................... 20,000 20,000 ..............
TROOP HOUSING, PH 7..................................... 20,000 20,000 ..............
MAYWAND:
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY........................... 7,000 7,000 ..............
SHANK:
AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT................................. 25,000 23,000 -2,000
EXPAND ECP 1 AND ECP 2.................................. 16,000 9,000 -7,000
GUARD TOWERS............................................ 2,400 2,400 ..............
ROADS AND UTILITIES, PH 1............................... 8,000 25,000 +17,000
SHARANA:
BULK MATERIALS TRANSFER STATION......................... 12,400 12,400 ..............
SHINDAND:
MEDICAL FACILITY........................................ 7,700 .............. -7,700
TARIN KOWT:
MEDICAL FACILITY........................................ 5,500 .............. -5,500
ROTARY WING PARKING AND TAXIWAY, PH 2................... 24,000 24,000 ..............
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY........................... 4,200 4,200 ..............
TOMBSTONE/BASTION:
CONTINGENCY HOUSING..................................... 41,000 41,000 ..............
DINING FACILITY......................................... 12,800 27,000 +14,200
ROTARY WING PARKING..................................... 35,000 35,000 ..............
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY........................... 13,000 13,000 ..............
WOLVERINE:
ENTRY CONTROL POINT..................................... 5,100 5,100 ..............
PERIMETER FENCE......................................... 5,100 5,100 ..............
ROTARY WING APRON....................................... 24,000 24,000 ..............
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY........................... 13,000 13,000 ..............
VARIOUS LOCATIONS:
ROUTE GYPSUM, PH 1...................................... 40,000 49,000 +9,000
AIR FORCE:
BAGRAM:
CONSOLIDATED RIGGING FACILITY........................... .............. 9,900 +9,900
FIGHTER HANGAR.......................................... .............. 16,480 +16,480
MEDEVAC RAMP EXPANSION/FIRE STATION..................... .............. 16,580 +16,580
KANDAHAR:
EXPAND CARGO HANDLING AREA.............................. 7,100 7,100 ..............
EXPEDITIONARY AIRLIFT SHELTER........................... 7,400 7,400 ..............
SHARANA:
RUNWAY.................................................. 35,000 .............. -35,000
SHINDAND:
PASSENGER & CARGO TERMINAL.............................. 15,800 15,800 ..............
TOMBSTONE/BASTION:
EXPAND FUELS OPERATIONS AND STORAGE..................... 2,500 2,500 ..............
PARALLEL TAXIWAY........................................ 86,000 .............. -86,000
REFUELER APRON.......................................... 55,000 .............. -55,000
WARRIOR:
RUNWAY.................................................. 8,700 .............. -8,700
WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CLASSIFIED PROJECT [NSA].................................... 41,900 41,900 ..............
WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED
ARMY:
MINOR CONSTRUCTION.......................................... 78,330 98,330 +20,000
PLANNING & DESIGN........................................... 89,716 101,266 +11,550
AIR FORCE:
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION.............................. 49,584 69,584 +20,000
PLANNING & DESIGN........................................... 13,422 19,482 +6,060
DEFENSE-WIDE:
PLANNING AND DESIGN......................................... 4,600 4,600 ..............
-----------------------------------------------
GRAND TOTAL............................................... 1,257,002 1,257,002 ..............
===============================================
RECAP
ARMY............................................................ 929,996 1,045,676 +115,680
AIR FORCE....................................................... 280,506 164,826 -115,680
DEFENSE-WIDE.................................................... 46,500 46,500 ..............
===============================================
GRAND TOTAL............................................... 1,257,002 1,257,002 ..............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLOSURE OF CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
The Constitution vests in the Congress the power of the
purse. The Committee believes strongly that Congress should
make the decisions on how to allocate the people's money.
As defined in Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the
Senate, the term ``congressionally directed spending item''
means a provision or report language included primarily at the
request of a Senator, providing, authorizing, or recommending a
specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit
authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan,
loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, or other expenditure
with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific State, locality
or congressional district, other than through a statutory or
administrative, formula-driven, or competitive award process.
For each item, a Member is required to provide a
certification that neither the Member nor the Member's
immediate family has a pecuniary interest in such
congressionally directed spending item. Such certifications are
available to the public on the website of the Senate Committee
on Appropriations (www.appropriations.senate.gov/senators.cfm).
Following is a list of congressionally directed spending
items included in the Senate recommendation discussed in this
report, along with the name of each Senator who submitted a
request to the Committee of jurisdiction for each item so
identified. Neither the Committee recommendation nor this
report contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff
benefits as defined in rule XLIV.
PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
[Dollars in thousands]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Account Project Funding Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
Army............................... Alabama: FORT RUCKER--AVIATION COMPONENT MAINTENANCE SHOP................................. $29,000 The President, Senator Sessions
Army............................... Alabama: FORT RUCKER--AVIATION MAINTENANCE FACILITY....................................... $36,000 The President, Senator Sessions
Army............................... Alabama: FORT RUCKER--TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................................ $4,650 The President, Senator Sessions
Navy............................... Alabama: MOBILE--T-6 SOLO CAPABLE OUTLYING LANDING FIELD.................................. $29,082 The President, Senator Sessions
Air Force.......................... Alabama: MAXWELL AFB--ADD/ALT AIR UNIVERSITY LIBRARY...................................... $13,400 The President, Senator Sessions
Air Guard.......................... Alabama: MONTGOMERY REGIONAL AIRPORT [ANG] BASE--FUEL CELL AND CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR... $7,472 The President, Senator Sessions
Army............................... Alaska: FORT GREELY--FIRE STATION......................................................... $26,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Army............................... Alaska: FORT RICHARDSON--BRIGADE COMPLEX, PH 1............................................ $67,038 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Army............................... Alaska: FORT RICHARDSON--MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE................................... $12,200 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Army............................... Alaska: FORT RICHARDSON--SIMULATIONS CENTER............................................... $34,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Army............................... Alaska: FORT WAINWRIGHT--AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 2A (HANGAR)...................... $92,650 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Army............................... Alaska: FORT WAINWRIGHT--AVIATION TASK FORCE COMPLEX, PH 2B [COF]......................... $27,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Army............................... Alaska: FORT WAINWRIGHT--URBAN ASSAULT COURSE............................................. $3,350 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Air Force.......................... Alaska: ELMENDORF AFB--ADD/ALTER AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON.......................... $4,749 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Air Force.......................... Alaska: ELMENDORF AFB--CONSTRUCT RAILHEAD OPERATIONS FACILITY............................. $15,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Air Force.......................... Alaska: ELMENDORF AFB--F-22 ADD/ALTER WEAPONS RELEASE SYSTEMS SHOP........................ $10,525 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Air Force.......................... Alaska: EIELSON AFB--REPAIR CENTRAL HEAT PLANT AND POWER PLANT BOILERS.................... $28,000 The President, Senators Begich and Murkowski
Navy............................... Arizona: YUMA--AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR................................................ $40,600 The President
Navy............................... Arizona: YUMA--AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR................................................ $63,280 The President
Navy............................... Arizona: YUMA--COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADE...................................... $63,730 The President
Navy............................... Arizona: YUMA--INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY FACILITY................................. $21,480 The President
Navy............................... Arizona: YUMA--SIMULATOR FACILITY......................................................... $36,060 The President
Navy............................... Arizona: YUMA--UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES.......................................... $44,320 The President
Navy............................... Arizona: YUMA--VAN PAD COMPLEX RELOCATION................................................. $15,590 The President
Air Force.......................... Arizona: DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB--AMARG HANGAR.................................................. $25,000 The President
Air Force.......................... Arizona: DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB--HC-130 AGE MAINTENANCE FACILITY............................... $4,600 The President
Air Force.......................... Arizona: DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB--HC-130J AERIAL CARGO FACILITY................................. $10,700 The President
Air Force.......................... Arizona: DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB--HC-130J PARTS STORE........................................... $8,200 The President
Air Force.......................... Arizona: FORT HUACHUCA--TFI--PREDATOR LRE BEDDOWN......................................... $11,000 The President
Air Guard.......................... Arizona: DAVIS MONTHAN AFB--TFI--PREDATOR FOC--ACTIVE DUTY ASSOCIATE...................... $4,650 The President
Army Guard......................... Arizona: FLORENCE--READINESS CENTER....................................................... $16,500 The President
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Arizona: YUMA--SOF MILITARY FREE FALL SIMULATOR........................................... $8,977 The President
Army Guard......................... Arkansas: FORT CHAFFEE--COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY........................ $19,000 The President, Senators Pryor and Lincoln
Army Guard......................... Arkansas: FORT CHAFFEE--LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE............................................. $2,500 The President, Senators Pryor and Lincoln
Army Guard......................... Arkansas: CAMP ROBINSON--COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP................................ $30,000 The President, Senators Pryor and Lincoln
Army............................... California: PRESIDIO MONTEREY--ADVANCED INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS...................... $63,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army............................... California: PRESIDIO MONTEREY--GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING............................... $39,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army............................... California: PRESIDIO MONTEREY--SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY.......................... $38,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CAMP PENDLETON--BEQ--13 AREA.................................................. $42,864 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CAMP PENDLETON--BEQ--LAS FLORES............................................... $37,020 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CAMP PENDLETON--CNATT/FRS--AVIATION TRAINING AND BEQ.......................... $66,110 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CAMP PENDLETON--CONVEYANCE/WATER TREATMENT.................................... $100,700 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CAMP PENDLETON--MALS-39 MAINTENANCE HANGAR EXPANSION.......................... $48,230 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CAMP PENDLETON--MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE................................ $9,950 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CAMP PENDLETON--NORTH REGION TERT TREAT PLANT (INCREMENTED)................... $30,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CAMP PENDLETON--SMALL ARMS MAGAZINE--EDSON RANGE.............................. $3,760 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CAMP PENDLETON--TRUCK COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX.............................. $53,490 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: CORONADO--ROTARY HANGAR....................................................... $67,160 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: MIRAMAR--AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR.......................................... $90,490 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: MIRAMAR--HANGAR 4............................................................. $33,620 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: MIRAMAR--PARKING APRON/TAXIWAY EXPANSION...................................... $66,500 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: SAN DIEGO--BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS, HOMEPORT ASHORE........................ $75,342 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: SAN DIEGO--BERTHING PIER 12 REPLACEMENT AND DREDGING, PHASE 1................. $108,414 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: SAN DIEGO--MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE..................................... $9,950 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy............................... California: TWENTYNINE PALMS--BEQ AND PARKING STRUCTURE................................... $53,158 The President, Senator Feinstein
Def-Wide--DLA...................... California: POINT LOMA ANNEX--REPLACE STORAGE FACILITY INCR 3............................. $20,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Def-Wide--DLA...................... California: POINT MUGU--AIRCRAFT DIRECT FUELING STATION................................... $3,100 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army Guard......................... California: CAMP ROBERTS--COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY...................... $19,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army Reserve....................... California: FAIRFIELD--ARMY RESERVE CENTER................................................ $26,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army Reserve....................... California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT--ECS TACTICAL EQUIPMENT MAINT FACILITY.................... $22,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army Reserve....................... California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT--ECS WAREHOUSE............................................ $15,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army Reserve....................... California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT--GRENADE LAUNCHER RANGE................................... $1,400 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army Reserve....................... California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT--HAND GRENADE FAMILIARIZATION RANGE (LIVE)................ $1,400 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army Reserve....................... California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT--LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE................................... $2,700 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army Reserve....................... California: FORT HUNTER LIGGETT--TACTICAL VEHICLE WASH RACK............................... $9,500 The President, Senator Feinstein
Navy Reserve....................... California: TWENTYNINE PALMS--TANK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY........................... $5,991 The President, Senator Feinstein
Army............................... Colorado: FORT CARSON--AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE.................................. $3,650 The President
Army............................... Colorado: FORT CARSON--BATTALION HEADQUARTERS............................................. $6,700 The President
Army............................... Colorado: FORT CARSON--BRIGADE COMPLEX.................................................... $56,000 The President
Army............................... Colorado: FORT CARSON--SIMULATIONS CENTER................................................. $40,000 The President
Air Force.......................... Colorado: BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE--SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS FACILITY..................... $12,160 The President
Air Force.......................... Colorado: PETERSON AFB--RAIDRS SPACE CONTROL FACILITY..................................... $24,800 The President
Air Force.......................... Colorado: U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY--CONST CENTER FOR CHARACTER & LEADERSHIP................. $27,600 The President
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Colorado: FORT CARSON--SOF TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE HANGAR........................ $3,717 The President
Army Guard......................... Colorado: COLORADO SPRINGS--READINESS CENTER.............................................. $20,000 The President
Army Guard......................... Colorado: FORT CARSON--REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE........................................ $40,000 The President
Army Guard......................... Colorado: GYPSUM--HAATS/AASF.............................................................. $39,000 The President
Army Guard......................... Colorado: WINDSOR--READINESS CENTER....................................................... $7,500 The President
Chem Demil Const................... Colorado: PUEBLO DEPOT--AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY, PH XII...................... $65,569 The President, Senators Bennet and Mark Udall
Army Guard......................... Connecticut: WINDSOR LOCKS--READINESS CENTER (AVIATION)................................... $41,000 The President, Senator Lieberman
Air Force.......................... Delaware: DOVER AFB--C-5M/C-17 MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY, PH 2........................ $3,200 The President
Army Guard......................... Delaware: NEW CASTLE--ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER [JFHQ].................................. $27,000 The President
Air Guard.......................... Delaware: NEW CASTLE COUNTY AIRPORT--JOINT FORCES OPERATIONS CENTER-ANG SHARE............. $1,500 The President
Air Force.......................... District of Columbia: BOLLING AFB--JOINT AIR DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER.................... $13,200 The President
Def-Wide--DIA...................... District of Columbia: BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE--REPLACE PARKING STRUCTURE, PHASE 1.......... $3,000 The President
Army............................... Florida: EGLIN AFB--CHAPEL................................................................ $6,900 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Army............................... Florida: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY--COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY.................................. $41,000 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Navy............................... Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND--CONSOLIDATED WAREHOUSE FACILITY................................... $17,260 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Navy............................... Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND--CONTAINER STAGING AND LOADING LOT................................. $5,990 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Navy............................... Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND--CONTAINER STORAGE LOT............................................. $4,910 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Navy............................... Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND--HARDSTAND EXTENSION............................................... $17,930 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Navy............................... Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND--PAINT AND BLAST FACILITY.......................................... $18,840 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Navy............................... Florida: BLOUNT ISLAND--WASHRACK EXPANSION................................................ $9,690 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Navy............................... Florida: TAMPA--JCSE VEHICLE PAINT FACILITY............................................... $2,300 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Air Force.......................... Florida: EGLIN AFB--F-35 FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE HANGAR..................................... $11,400 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Air Force.......................... Florida: HURLBURT FIELD--ADD TO VISITING QUARTERS (24 RM)................................. $4,500 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Air Force.......................... Florida: HURLBURT FIELD--ADAL SPECIAL OPERATIONS SCHOOL FACILITY.......................... $6,170 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Air Force.......................... Florida: HURLBURT FIELD--BASE LOGISTICS FACILITY.......................................... $24,000 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Air Force.......................... Florida: PATRICK AFB--AIR FORCE TECHNICAL APPLICATION CENTER.............................. $100,009 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Florida: EGLIN AFB--SOF GROUND SUPPORT BATTALION DETACHMENT............................... $6,030 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Air Guard.......................... Florida: JACKSONVILLE IAP--SECURITY FORCES TRAINING FACILITY.............................. $6,700 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Army Reserve....................... Florida: NORTH FORT MYERS--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND....................................... $13,800 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Army Reserve....................... Florida: ORLANDO--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND................................................ $10,200 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Army Reserve....................... Florida: TALLAHASSEE--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................................ $10,400 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Air Force Reserve.................. Florida: PATRICK AFB--WEAPONS MAINTENANCE FACILITY........................................ $3,420 The President, Senator Bill Nelson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT BENNING--LAND ACQUISITION................................................... $12,200 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT BENNING--TRAINEE BARRACKS, PH 2............................................. $51,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT BENNING--TRAINING BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 2................................... $14,600 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT BENNING--TRAINING BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 2................................... $14,600 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT BENNING--VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP........................................... $53,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT GORDON--TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................................ $4,150 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT STEWART--AUTOMATED INFANTRY PLATOON BATTLE COURSE........................... $6,200 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT STEWART--AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE........................... $9,100 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT STEWART--AVIATION UNIT OPERATIONS COMPLEX................................... $47,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT STEWART--BATTALION COMPLEX.................................................. $18,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT STEWART--GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING....................................... $8,200 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT STEWART--MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE......................................... $3,750 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT STEWART--SIMULATIONS CENTER................................................. $26,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Georgia: FORT STEWART--TRAINING AIDS CENTER............................................... $7,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Navy............................... Georgia: KINGS BAY--SECURITY ENCLAVE & VEHICLE BARRIERS................................... $45,004 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Navy............................... Georgia: KINGS BAY--WATERFRONT EMERGENCY POWER............................................ $15,660 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Def-Wide--DLA...................... Georgia: HUNTER ANGS--FUEL UNLOAD FACILITY................................................ $2,400 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... Georgia: FORT BENNING--DEXTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONSTRUCT GYM............................. $2,800 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Def-Wide--NSA...................... Georgia: AUGUSTA--NSA/CSS GEORGIA TRAINING FACILITY....................................... $12,855 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Georgia: FORT BENNING--SOF MWD KENNEL COMPLEX............................................. $3,624 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Georgia: HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD--SOF TEMF EXPANSION......................................... $3,318 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Georgia: FORT BENNING--SOF COMPANY SUPPORT FACILITY....................................... $20,441 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Georgia: FORT STEWART--HEALTH CLINIC ADDTION/ALTERATION................................... $35,100 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army Guard......................... Georgia: CUMMING--READINESS CENTER........................................................ $17,000 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army Guard......................... Georgia: DOBBINS ARB--READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT............................................ $10,400 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Air Guard.......................... Georgia: SAVANNAH/HILTON HEAD IAP--RELOCATE AIR SUPT OPERS SQDN........................... $7,450 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army Reserve....................... Georgia: MACON--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND.................................................. $11,400 The President, Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Hawaii: FORT SHAFTER--COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY, PH 1.................................. $58,000 The President, Senator Inouye
Army............................... Hawaii: FORT SHAFTER--FLOOD MITIGATION.................................................... $23,000 The President, Senator Inouye
Army............................... Hawaii: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS--BARRACKS...................................................... $90,000 The President, Senator Inouye
Army............................... Hawaii: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS--BARRACKS...................................................... $98,000 The President, Senator Inouye
Army............................... Hawaii: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS--TRAINING AIDS CENTER.......................................... $24,000 The President, Senator Inouye
Army............................... Hawaii: TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER--BARRACKS............................................. $28,000 The President, Senator Inouye
Navy............................... Hawaii: CAMP SMITH--PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER............................................... $29,960 The President, Senator Inouye
Navy............................... Hawaii: KANEOHE BAY--BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS........................................... $90,530 The President, Senator Inouye
Navy............................... Hawaii: KANEOHE BAY--WATERFRONT OPERATIONS FACILITY....................................... $19,130 The President, Senator Inouye
Navy............................... Hawaii: PEARL HARBOR--CTR FOR DISASTER MGT/HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE........................ $9,140 The President, Senator Inouye
Navy............................... Hawaii: PEARL HARBOR--JOINT POW/MIA ACCOUNTING COMMAND.................................... $99,328 The President, Senator Inouye
Def-Wide--DLA...................... Hawaii: HICKAM AFB--ALTER FUEL STORAGE TANKS.............................................. $8,500 The President, Senator Inouye
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Hawaii: PEARL HARBOR--NSWG3 COMMAND AND OPERATIONS FACILITY............................... $28,804 The President, Senator Inouye
Army Guard......................... Hawaii: KALAELOA--COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP....................................... $38,000 The President, Senator Inouye
Air Guard.......................... Hawaii: HICKAM AFB--TFI--F-22 BEDDOWN INTRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT.............................. $5,950 The President, Senator Inouye
Air Guard.......................... Hawaii: HICKAM AFB--TFI--F-22 HANGAR, SQUADRON OPERATIONS AND AMU......................... $48,250 The President, Senator Inouye
Air Guard.......................... Hawaii: HICKAM AFB--TFI--F-22 UPGRADE MUNITIONS COMPLEX................................... $17,250 The President, Senator Inouye
Def-Wide--DLA...................... Idaho: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB--REPLACE POL FUEL STORAGE TANKS.................................. $27,500 The President
Army Guard......................... Idaho: GOWEN FIELD--BARRACKS [ORTC], PH 1................................................. $17,500 The President
Army Guard......................... Idaho: MOUNTAIN HOME--TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY.......................... $6,300 The President
Def-Wide--DISA..................... Illinois: SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE--FIELD COMMAND FACILITY UPGRADE............................ $1,388 The President, Senator Durbin
Army Guard......................... Illinois: SPRINGFIELD--COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ADD/ALT.......................... $15,000 The President, Senator Durbin
Air Guard.......................... Illinois: CAPITAL MAP--TFI--CNAF BEDDOWN--UPGRADE FACILITIES.............................. $16,700 The President, Senator Durbin
Army Reserve....................... Illinois: QUINCY--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND................................................ $12,200 The President, Senator Durbin
Air Guard.......................... Indiana: HULMAN REGIONAL AIRPORT--TFI--ASOS BEDDOWN--UPGRADE FACILITIES................... $4,100 The President
Army Reserve....................... Indiana: MICHIGAN CITY--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND.......................................... $15,500 The President
Army Reserve....................... Iowa: DES MOINES--ARMY RESERVE CENTER..................................................... $8,175 The President
Army............................... Kansas: FORT LEAVENWORTH--VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP........................................ $7,100 The President
Army............................... Kansas: FORT RILEY--AUTOMATED INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE................................ $4,100 The President
Army............................... Kansas: FORT RILEY--AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION/TRAINING RANGE................................ $14,800 The President
Army............................... Kansas: FORT RILEY--BATTALION COMPLEX, PH 1............................................... $31,000 The President
Army............................... Kansas: FORT RILEY--KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE.................................................. $7,200 The President
Army Guard......................... Kansas: WICHITA--FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP................................................... $24,000 The President
Army Guard......................... Kansas: WICHITA--READINESS CENTER......................................................... $43,000 The President
Army............................... Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL--AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE................................ $1,500 The President, Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL--BRIGADE COMPLEX.................................................. $67,000 The President, Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL--COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES.................................... $25,000 The President, Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL--RAPPELLING TRAINING AREA......................................... $5,600 The President, Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL--UNIT OPERATIONS FACILITIES....................................... $26,000 The President, Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL--URBAN ASSAULT COURSE............................................. $3,300 The President, Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL--VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP......................................... $15,500 The President, Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: FORT KNOX--ACCESS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS......................................... $6,000 The President, Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: FORT KNOX--MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY.................................... $12,800 The President, Senator McConnell
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Kentucky: FORT CAMPBELL--SOF BATTALION OPS COMPLEX........................................ $38,095 The President, Senator McConnell
Army Guard......................... Kentucky: BURLINGTON--READINESS CENTER.................................................... $19,500 The President, Senator McConnell
Chem Demil Const................... Kentucky: BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT--AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION, PH XI....................... $59,402 The President, Senator McConnell
Army............................... Louisiana: FORT POLK--BARRACKS............................................................ $29,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
Army............................... Louisiana: FORT POLK--HEAVY SNIPER RANGE.................................................. $4,250 The President, Senator Landrieu
Army............................... Louisiana: FORT POLK--LAND ACQUISITION.................................................... $6,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
Army............................... Louisiana: FORT POLK--LAND ACQUISITION.................................................... $24,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
Air Force.......................... Louisiana: BARKSDALE AFB--WEAPONS LOAD CREW TRAINING FACILITY............................. $18,140 The President, Senator Landrieu
Army Guard......................... Louisiana: FORT POLK--TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY.......................... $5,500 The President, Senator Landrieu
Army Guard......................... Louisiana: MINDEN--READINESS CENTER....................................................... $28,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
Navy Reserve....................... Louisiana: NEW ORLEANS--JOINT AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITY................................ $16,281 The President, Senator Landrieu
Army............................... Maryland: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND--AUTO TECH EVALUATE FACILITY, PH 2...................... $14,600 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Army............................... Maryland: FORT MEADE--INDOOR FIRING RANGE................................................. $7,600 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Army............................... Maryland: FORT MEADE--WIDEBAND SATCOM OPERATIONS CENTER................................... $25,000 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Navy............................... Maryland: INDIAN HEAD--AGILE CHEMICAL FACILITY, PHASE 2................................... $34,238 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Navy............................... Maryland: PATUXENT RIVER--BROAD AREA MARITIME SURVEILLANCE T & E FACILITY................. $42,211 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--DLA...................... Maryland: ANDREWS AFB--REPLACE FUEL STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION FACILITY....................... $14,000 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--NSA...................... Maryland: FORT MEADE--NORTH CAMPUS UTILITY PLANT.......................................... $219,360 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Maryland: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND--USAMRICD REPLACEMENT, INC 3............................ $105,000 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Maryland: BETHESDA NAVAL HOSPITAL--NNMC PARKING EXPANSION................................. $17,100 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Maryland: BETHESDA NAVAL HOSPITAL--TRANSIENT WOUNDED WARRIOR LODGING...................... $62,900 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK--CONSOLIDATED LOGISTICS FACILITY................................... $23,100 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK--INFORMATION SERVICES FACILITY EXPANSION........................... $4,300 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK--NIBC SECURITY FENCING AND EQUIPMENT............................... $2,700 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK--SUPPLEMENTAL WATER STORAGE........................................ $3,700 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK--USAMRIID STAGE I, INC 5........................................... $17,400 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Maryland: FORT DETRICK--WATER TREATMENT PLANT REPAIR & SUPPLEMENT......................... $11,900 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Army Guard......................... Maryland: ST. INIGOES--TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY......................... $5,500 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Air Guard.......................... Maryland: MARTIN STATE AIRPORT--REPLACE OPS AND MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY................. $11,400 The President, Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Massachusetts: HANSCOM AFB--MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC ADDITION................................. $2,900 The President, Senator Kerry
Army Guard......................... Massachusetts: HANSCOM AFB--ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER [JFHQ], PH 2...................... $23,000 The President, Senator Kerry
Army Reserve....................... Massachusetts: DEVENS RESERVE FORCES TRAINING AREA--AUTOMATED RECORD FIRE RANGE........... $4,700 The President, Senator Kerry
Army Guard......................... Michigan: CAMP GRAYLING RANGE--COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY................. $19,000 The President, Senators Levin and Stabenow
Army Guard......................... Minnesota: ARDEN HILLS--FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP............................................ $29,000 The President
Army Guard......................... Minnesota: CAMP RIPLEY--INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE...................................... $4,300 The President
Army Guard......................... Minnesota: CAMP RIPLEY--TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM FACILITY........................ $4,450 The President
Army............................... Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD--BARRACKS..................................................... $29,000 The President
Army............................... Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD--BRIGADE HEADQUARTERS......................................... $12,200 The President
Army............................... Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD--GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING................................. $7,000 The President
Army............................... Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD--INFORMATION SYSTEMS FACILITY................................. $15,500 The President
Army............................... Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD--TRAINING BARRACKS............................................ $19,000 The President
Army............................... Missouri: FORT LEONARD WOOD--TRANSIENT ADVANCED TRAINEE BARRACKS, PH 2.................... $29,000 The President
Army Reserve....................... Missouri: BELTON--ARMY RESERVE CENTER..................................................... $11,800 The President
Army Guard......................... Nebraska: LINCOLN--READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT............................................... $3,300 The President, Senator Ben Nelson
Army Guard......................... Nebraska: MEAD--READINESS CENTER.......................................................... $11,400 The President, Senator Ben Nelson
Air Force.......................... Nevada: CREECH AFB--UAS AIRFIELD FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION................................ $11,710 The President, Senator Reid
Air Force.......................... Nevada: NELLIS AFB--F-35 ADD/ALTER FLIGHT TEST INSTRUMENTATION FA......................... $1,900 The President, Senator Reid
Air Force.......................... Nevada: NELLIS AFB--F-35 ADD/ALTER 422 TEST EVALUATION SQUADRON........................... $7,870 The President, Senator Reid
Air Force.......................... Nevada: NELLIS AFB--F-35 FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY........................................ $13,110 The President, Senator Reid
Air Force.......................... Nevada: NELLIS AFB--F-35 MAINTENANCE HANGAR/AMU........................................... $28,760 The President, Senator Reid
Army Guard......................... New Hampshire: PEMBROKE--BARRACKS FACILITY (REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE).................. $15,000 The President
Army Guard......................... New Hampshire: PEMBROKE--CLASSROOM FACILITY (REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE)................. $21,000 The President
Air Force.......................... New Jersey: MCGUIRE AFB--BASE OPS/COMMAND POST FACILITY [TFI]............................. $8,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg and Menendez
Air Force.......................... New Jersey: MCGUIRE AFB--DORMITORY (120 RM)............................................... $18,440 The President, Senators Lautenberg and Menendez
Army............................... New Mexico: WHITE SANDS--BARRACKS......................................................... $29,000 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Air Force.......................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB--DORMITORY (96 RM)................................................. $14,000 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Air Force.......................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB--UAS SQUADRON OPS FACILITY......................................... $20,000 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Air Force.......................... New Mexico: HOLLOMAN AFB--UAS ADD/ALTER MAINTENANCE HANGAR................................ $15,470 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Air Force.......................... New Mexico: HOLLOMAN AFB--UAS MAINTENANCE HANGAR.......................................... $22,500 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Air Force.......................... New Mexico: KIRTLAND AFB--AERIAL DELIVERY FACILITY ADDITION............................... $3,800 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Air Force.......................... New Mexico: KIRTLAND AFB--ARMAMENT SHOP................................................... $6,460 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Air Force.......................... New Mexico: KIRTLAND AFB--H/MC-130 FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE FACILITY....................... $14,142 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB--SOF HANGAR/AMU (MC-130J).......................................... $24,622 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB--SOF AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON (MC-130J).............................. $12,636 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB--SOF C-130 PARKING APRON PHASE I................................... $26,006 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB--SOF OPERATIONS AND TRAINING COMPLEX............................... $39,674 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... New Mexico: CANNON AFB--SOF ADD/ALT SIMULATOR FACILITY FOR MC-130......................... $13,287 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Def-Wide--TMA...................... New Mexico: WHITE SANDS--HEALTH AND DENTAL CLINICS........................................ $22,900 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Army Guard......................... New Mexico: FARMINGTON--READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT.......................................... $8,500 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Army Reserve....................... New Mexico: LAS CRUCES--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND.......................................... $11,400 The President, Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Army............................... New York: FORT DRUM--AIRCRAFT FUEL STORAGE COMPLEX........................................ $14,600 The President
Army............................... New York: FORT DRUM--AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR.......................................... $16,500 The President
Army............................... New York: FORT DRUM--BATTALION COMPLEX.................................................... $61,000 The President
Army............................... New York: FORT DRUM--BRIGADE COMPLEX, PH 1................................................ $55,000 The President
Army............................... New York: FORT DRUM--INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE......................................... $8,200 The President
Army............................... New York: FORT DRUM--TRAINING AIDS CENTER................................................. $18,500 The President
Army............................... New York: FORT DRUM--TRANSIENT TRAINING BARRACKS.......................................... $55,000 The President
Army............................... New York: U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY--SCIENCE FACILITY, PH 2................................... $130,624 The President
Army............................... New York: U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY--URBAN ASSAULT COURSE..................................... $1,700 The President
Air Force.......................... New York: FORT DRUM--20TH AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON COMPLEX......................... $20,440 The President
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... New York: U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY--WEST POINT MS ADD/ALT.................................... $27,960 The President
Air Guard.......................... New York: FORT DRUM--TFI--REAPER INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT................................... $2,500 The President
Air Guard.......................... New York: STEWART IAP--BASE DEFENSE GROUP BEDDOWN......................................... $14,250 The President
Army Reserve....................... New York: BINGHAMTON--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................................ $13,400 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--BATTALION COMPLEX............................................. $33,000 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--BRIGADE COMPLEX............................................... $25,000 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--BRIGADE COMPLEX............................................... $41,000 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--BRIGADE COMPLEX............................................... $50,000 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY.................................. $53,000 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES................................. $12,600 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--DINING FACILITY............................................... $11,200 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--MURCHISON ROAD RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION....................... $17,000 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--STAGING AREA COMPLEX.......................................... $14,600 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--STUDENT BARRACKS.............................................. $18,000 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP...................................... $7,500 The President
Army............................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP...................................... $28,000 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--2ND INTEL BN MAINTENANCE/OPS COMPLEX........................ $90,270 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--ARMORY--II MEF--WALLACE CREEK............................... $12,280 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--BEQ--CAMP JOHNSON........................................... $46,550 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--BEQ--COURTHOUSE BAY......................................... $40,780 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--BEQ--COURTHOUSE BAY......................................... $42,330 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--BEQ--FRENCH CREEK........................................... $43,640 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--BEQ--RIFLE RANGE............................................ $55,350 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--BEQ--WALLACE CREEK.......................................... $51,660 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--BEQ--WALLACE CREEK NORTH.................................... $46,290 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--EOD ADDITION--2ND MARINE LOGISTICS GROUP.................... $7,420 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--HANGAR...................................................... $73,010 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--MAINTENANCE HANGAR [HMLA]................................... $74,260 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--MAINTENANCE/OPS COMPLEX--2ND ANGLICO........................ $36,100 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--MARINE CORPS ENERGY INITIATIVE.............................. $9,950 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--MESS HALL--FRENCH CREEK..................................... $25,960 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--MESS HALL ADDITION--COURTHOUSE BAY.......................... $2,553 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--MOTOR TRANSPORTATION/COMM. MAINT. FACILITY.................. $18,470 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--UTILITY EXPANSION--FRENCH CREEK............................. $56,050 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--UTILITY EXPANSION--HADNOT POINT............................. $56,470 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CHERRY POINT MCAS--BEQ.................................................... $42,500 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CHERRY POINT MCAS--MARINERS BAY LAND ACQUISITION--BOGUE................... $3,790 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CHERRY POINT MCAS--MISSILE MAGAZINE....................................... $13,420 The President
Navy............................... North Carolina: CHERRY POINT MCAS--STATION INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES........................ $5,800 The President
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... North Carolina: CAMP LEJEUNE--TARAWA TERRACE I ES REPLACE SCHOOL.......................... $16,646 The President
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--MCNAIR ES--REPLACE SCHOOL..................................... $23,086 The President
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--MURRAY ES--REPLACE SCHOOL..................................... $22,000 The President
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--SOF OPERATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY....................... $11,000 The President
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--SOF ADMIN/COMPANY OPERATIONS.................................. $10,347 The President
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--SOF OPERATIONS ADDITIONS...................................... $15,795 The President
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--SOF JOINT INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE FACILITY....................... $32,000 The President
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--SOF C4 FACILITY--JSOC......................................... $41,000 The President
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... North Carolina: FORT BRAGG--SOF OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY............................... $13,465 The President
Army Guard......................... North Carolina: HIGH POINT--READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT...................................... $1,551 The President
Air Guard.......................... North Carolina: STANLY COUNTY AIRPORT--UPGRADE ASOS FACILITIES............................ $2,000 The President
Air Force.......................... North Dakota: MINOT AFB--CONTROL TOWER/BASE OPERATIONS FACILITY........................... $18,770 The President, Senators Dorgan and Conrad
Army Guard......................... North Dakota: CAMP GRAFTON--READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT...................................... $11,200 The President, Senators Dorgan and Conrad
Def-Wide--DLA...................... Ohio: COLUMBUS--REPLACE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY............................................ $7,400 The President
Army............................... Oklahoma: FORT SILL--GENERAL PURPOSE STORAGE BUILDING..................................... $13,800 The President
Army............................... Oklahoma: MCALESTER--IGLOO STORAGE, DEPOT LEVEL........................................... $3,000 The President
Air Force.......................... Oklahoma: TINKER AFB--UPGRADE BUILDING 3001 INFRASTRUCTURE, PH III........................ $14,000 The President
Def-Wide--DLA...................... Pennsylvania: DEF DISTRIBUTION DEPOT NEW CUMBERLAND--REPLACE HEADQUARTERS FACILITY........ $96,000 The President, Senators Specter and Casey
Air Guard.......................... Pennsylvania: STATE COLLEGE ANGS--ADD TO AND ALTER AOS FACILITY........................... $4,100 The President, Senators Specter and Casey
Navy............................... Rhode Island: NEWPORT--ELECTROMAGNETIC SENSOR FACILITY.................................... $27,007 The President, Senator Reed
Army Guard......................... Rhode Island: EAST GREENWICH--UNITED STATES PROPERTY & FISCAL OFFICE...................... $27,000 The President, Senator Reed
Army............................... South Carolina: FORT JACKSON--TRAINING AIDS CENTER........................................ $17,000 The President, Senator Graham
Army............................... South Carolina: FORT JACKSON--TRAINEE BARRACKS............................................ $28,000 The President, Senator Graham
Army............................... South Carolina: FORT JACKSON--TRAINEE BARRACKS COMPLEX, PH 1.............................. $46,000 The President, Senator Graham
Navy............................... South Carolina: BEAUFORT--AICUZ LAND ACQUISITION.......................................... $21,190 The President, Senator Graham
Navy............................... South Carolina: BEAUFORT--AIRCRAFT HANGAR--VMFAT--502..................................... $46,550 The President, Senator Graham
Navy............................... South Carolina: BEAUFORT--PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER......................................... $15,430 The President, Senator Graham
Navy............................... South Carolina: BEAUFORT--TRAINING AND SIMULATOR FACILITY................................. $46,240 The President, Senator Graham
Air Force.......................... South Carolina: CHARLESTON AFB--CIVIL ENGINEER COMPLEX [TFI]--PHASE 1..................... $15,000 The President, Senator Graham
Army Guard......................... South Dakota: WATERTOWN--READINESS CENTER................................................. $25,000 The President, Senator Johnson
Air Guard.......................... Tennessee: NASHVILLE IAP--TFI--RENOVATE INTEL SQUADRON FACILITIES......................... $5,500 The President
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE............................... $6,700 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES.......................................... $18,500 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING RANGE.................................... $22,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--HEAVY SNIPER RANGE..................................................... $3,500 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--INDOOR SWIMMING POOL................................................... $15,500 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE................................................. $2,100 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--LIVE FIRE EXERCISE SHOOTHOUSE.......................................... $3,150 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--SCOUT/RECCE GUNNERY COMPLEX............................................ $15,500 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--SQUAD DEFENSE RANGE.................................................... $3,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--THAAD BATTERY COMPLEX.................................................. $17,500 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--TRANSIENT TRAINING COMPLEX............................................. $31,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................................................... $2,800 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT BLISS--VEHICLE BRIDGE OVERPASS................................................ $8,700 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT HOOD--BATTALION COMPLEX....................................................... $40,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT HOOD--BRIGADE COMPLEX......................................................... $38,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT HOOD--COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITIES........................................... $4,300 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT HOOD--CONVOY LIVE FIRE........................................................ $3,200 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT HOOD--LIVE FIRE EXERCISE SHOOTHOUSE........................................... $2,100 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT HOOD--UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM [UAS]HANGAR...................................... $55,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT HOOD--URBAN ASSAULT COURSE.................................................... $2,450 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT SAM HOUSTON--SIMULATIONS CENTER............................................... $16,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army............................... Texas: FORT SAM HOUSTON--TRAINING AIDS CENTER............................................. $6,200 The President, Senator Hutchison
Air Force.......................... Texas: DYESS AFB--C-130J ADD/ALTER FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY.............................. $4,080 The President, Senator Hutchison
Air Force.......................... Texas: ELLINGTON FIELD--TFI--UPGRADE UAV MAINTENANCE HANGAR............................... $7,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Air Force.......................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB--BMT SATELLITE CLASSROOM/DINING FACILITY NO. 2........................ $32,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Air Force.......................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB--ONE-COMPANY FIRE STATION............................................. $5,500 The President, Senator Hutchison
Air Force.......................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB--RECRUIT DORMITORY, PHASE 3........................................... $67,980 The President, Senator Hutchison
Air Force.......................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB--RECRUIT/FAMILY INPROCESSING & INFO CENTER............................ $21,800 The President, Senator Hutchison
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Texas: LACKLAND AFB--AMBULATORY CARE CENTER, PH 2......................................... $120,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Texas: FORT BLISS--HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT INCR 2............................................ $147,100 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army Guard......................... Texas: CAMP MAXEY--COMBAT PISTOL/MILITARY PISTOL QUALIFICATION............................ $2,500 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army Guard......................... Texas: CAMP SWIFT--URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................................................... $2,600 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army Reserve....................... Texas: DENTON--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND................................................... $12,600 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army Reserve....................... Texas: RIO GRANDE--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................................... $6,100 The President, Senator Hutchison
Army Reserve....................... Texas: SAN MARCOS--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................................... $8,500 The President, Senator Hutchison
Air Force.......................... Utah: HILL AFB--F-22 T-10 ENGINE TEST CELL................................................ $2,800 The President
Def-Wide--NSA...................... Utah: CAMP WILLIAMS--CNCI DATA CENTER INCREMENT 2......................................... $398,358 The President
Army............................... Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL--1200 METER RANGE................................................ $14,500 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army............................... Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL--INDOOR FIRING RANGE............................................. $6,200 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army............................... Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL--KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE............................................ $3,800 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army............................... Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL--LIGHT DEMOLITION RANGE.......................................... $4,100 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army............................... Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL--MOUT COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY............................... $65,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army............................... Virginia: FORT EUSTIS--WARRIOR IN TRANSITION COMPLEX...................................... $18,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army............................... Virginia: FORT LEE--AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE................................ $7,700 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army............................... Virginia: FORT LEE--COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITY........................................... $4,900 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army............................... Virginia: FORT LEE--TRAINING AIDS CENTER.................................................. $5,800 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Navy............................... Virginia: NORFOLK--PIER 1 UPGRADES TO BERTH USNS COMFORT.................................. $10,035 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Navy............................... Virginia: NORFOLK--PIERS 9 AND 10 UPGRADES FOR DDG 1000................................... $2,400 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Navy............................... Virginia: QUANTICO--ACADEMIC FACILITY ADDITION--SNCOA..................................... $12,080 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Navy............................... Virginia: QUANTICO--BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS--WTBN...................................... $37,810 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Navy............................... Virginia: QUANTICO--RESEARCH CENTER ADDITION--MCU......................................... $37,920 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Navy............................... Virginia: QUANTICO--STUDENT OFFICER QUARTERS--TBS......................................... $55,822 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Navy............................... Virginia: PORTSMOUTH--SHIP REPAIR PIER REPLACEMENT (INCREMENTED).......................... $100,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Air Force.......................... Virginia: LANGLEY AFB--F-22 ADD/ALTER HANGAR BAY LO/CR FACILITY--TF....................... $8,800 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Def-Wide........................... Virginia: PENTAGON--PENTAGON METRO & CORRIDOR 8 SCREENING FACILITY........................ $6,473 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Def-Wide........................... Virginia: PENTAGON--POWER PLANT MODERNIZATION PHASE 3..................................... $51,928 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Def-Wide........................... Virginia: PENTAGON--SECURE ACCESS LANE--REMOTE VEHICLE SCREENING.......................... $4,923 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Def-Wide--DLA...................... Virginia: CRANEY ISLAND--REPLACE FUEL PIER................................................ $58,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... Virginia: QUANTICO--NEW CONSOLIDATED ELEMETARY SCHOOL..................................... $47,355 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Virginia: FORT BELVOIR--DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT......................................... $6,300 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army Reserve....................... Virginia: FORT A.P. HILL--ARMY RESERVE CENTER............................................. $15,500 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army Reserve....................... Virginia: FORT STORY--ARMY RESERVE CENTER................................................. $11,000 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army Reserve....................... Virginia: ROANOKE--ARMY RESERVE CENTER/LAND............................................... $14,800 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Navy Reserve....................... Virginia: WILLIAMSBURG--NAVY ORDNANCE CARGO LOGISTICS TRAINING COMPLEX.................... $21,346 The President, Senators Webb and Warner
Army............................... Washington: YAKIMA--SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE............................................... $3,750 The President, Senator Murray
Army............................... Washington: FORT LEWIS--BARRACKS.......................................................... $47,000 The President, Senator Murray
Army............................... Washington: FORT LEWIS--BARRACKS COMPLEX.................................................. $40,000 The President, Senator Murray
Army............................... Washington: FORT LEWIS--RAPPELLING TRAINING AREA.......................................... $5,300 The President, Senator Murray
Army............................... Washington: FORT LEWIS--REGIONAL LOGISTIC SPT COMPLEX WAREHOUSE........................... $16,500 The President, Senator Murray
Army............................... Washington: FORT LEWIS--REGIONAL LOGISTIC SUPPORT COMPLEX................................. $63,000 The President, Senator Murray
Navy............................... Washington: BANGOR--LIMITED AREA EMERGENCY POWER.......................................... $15,810 The President, Senator Murray
Navy............................... Washington: BANGOR--CSDS-5 LABORATORY EXPANSION PHASE 1................................... $16,170 The President, Senator Murray
Navy............................... Washington: BANGOR--WATERFRONT RESTRICTED AREA EMERGENCY POWER............................ $24,913 The President, Senator Murray
Navy............................... Washington: BREMERTON--LIMITED AREA PRODUCT/STRG CMPLX (INCREMENTED)...................... $19,116 The President, Senator Murray
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Washington: FORT LEWIS--PREVENTIVE MEDICINE FACILITY...................................... $8,400 The President, Senator Murray
Army Guard......................... Washington: TACOMA--COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP..................................... $25,000 The President, Senator Murray
Navy Reserve....................... Washington: YAKIMA--MARINE CORPS RESERVE CENTER........................................... $13,844 The President, Senator Murray
Army Guard......................... West Virginia: MOOREFIELD--READINESS CENTER............................................... $14,200 The President
Army Guard......................... West Virginia: MORGANTOWN--READINESS CENTER............................................... $21,000 The President
Army Guard......................... Wisconsin: MADISON--AIRCRAFT PARKING...................................................... $5,700 The President
Army Reserve....................... Wisconsin: FORT MCCOY--AT/MOB BILLETING COMPLEX PHASE I................................... $9,800 The President
Army Reserve....................... Wisconsin: FORT MCCOY--NCO ACADEMY PHASE II............................................... $10,000 The President
Air Force.......................... Wyoming: CAMP GUERNSEY--NUCLEAR/SPACE SECURITY TACTICS TRAINING CENTER.................... $4,650 The President
Army Guard......................... Wyoming: LARAMIE--FIELD MAINTENANCE SHOP.................................................. $14,400 The President
Navy............................... Bahrain Island: SW ASIA--NAVCENT AMMUNITION MAGAZINES..................................... $89,280 The President
Navy............................... Bahrain Island: SW ASIA--OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT FACILITIES................................ $60,002 The President
Navy............................... Bahrain Island: SW ASIA--WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, PHASE 3.................................. $63,871 The President
Air Force.......................... Bahrain Island: SW ASIA--NORTH APRON EXPANSION............................................ $45,000 The President
Def-Wide........................... Belgium: BRUSSELS--NATO HEADQUARTERS FACILITY............................................. $31,863 The President
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... Belgium: BRUSSELS--REPLACE SHAPE MS/HS.................................................... $67,311 The President
Navy............................... Djibouti: CAMP LEMONIER--CAMP LEMONIER HQ FACILITY........................................ $12,407 The President
Navy............................... Djibouti: CAMP LEMONIER--GENERAL WAREHOUSE................................................ $7,324 The President
Navy............................... Djibouti: CAMP LEMONIER--PAVE EXTERNAL ROADS.............................................. $3,824 The President
Army............................... Germany: ANSBACH--PHYSICAL FITNESS CENTER................................................. $13,800 The President
Army............................... Germany: ANSBACH--VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP................................................ $18,000 The President
Army............................... Germany: GRAFENWOEHR--BARRACKS............................................................ $17,500 The President
Army............................... Germany: GRAFENWOEHR--BARRACKS............................................................ $19,000 The President
Army............................... Germany: GRAFENWOEHR--BARRACKS............................................................ $19,000 The President
Army............................... Germany: GRAFENWOEHR--BARRACKS............................................................ $20,000 The President
Army............................... Germany: RHINE ORDNANCE BARRACKS--BARRACKS COMPLEX........................................ $35,000 The President
Army............................... Germany: SEMBACH AB--CONFINEMENT FACILITY................................................. $9,100 The President
Army............................... Germany: WIESBADEN AB--COMMAND AND BATTLE CENTER, INCR 2.................................. $59,500 The President
Army............................... Germany: WIESBADEN AB--CONSTRUCT NEW ACP.................................................. $5,100 The President
Army............................... Germany: WIESBADEN AB--INFORMATION PROCESSING CENTER...................................... $30,400 The President
Army............................... Germany: WIESBADEN AB--SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION FACILITY....................... $45,500 The President
Air Force.......................... Germany: KAPAUN--DORMITORY (128 RM)....................................................... $19,600 The President
Air Force.......................... Germany: RAMSTEIN AB--CONSTRUCT C-130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY.......................... $8,800 The President
Air Force.......................... Germany: RAMSTEIN AB--DEICING FLUID STORAGE & DISPENSING FACILITY......................... $2,754 The President
Air Force.......................... Germany: RAMSTEIN AB--UAS SATCOM RELAY PADS & FACILITY.................................... $10,800 The President
Air Force.......................... Germany: VILSECK--AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON [ASOS].................................. $12,900 The President
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... Germany: PANZER KASERNE--REPLACE BOEBLINGEN HS............................................ $48,968 The President
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Germany: KATTERBACH--HEALTH/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT..................................... $37,100 The President
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Germany: VILSECK--HEALTH CLINIC ADD/ALT................................................... $34,800 The President
Navy............................... Guam: GUAM--APRA HARBOR WHARVES IMP. (PHASE 1, INC)....................................... $40,000 The President
Navy............................... Guam: GUAM--DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS.............................................. $66,730 The President
Air Force.......................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB--GUAM STRIKE OPS GROUP & TANKER TASK FORCE............................. $9,100 The President
Air Force.......................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB--GUAM STRIKE SOUTH RAMP UTILITIES, PHASE 1............................. $12,200 The President
Air Force.......................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB--PRTC--COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS FACILITY....................... $9,200 The President
Air Force.......................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB--PRTC--RED HORSE HEADQUARTERS/ENGINEERING FACILITY..................... $8,000 The President
Air Force.......................... Guam: ANDERSEN AFB--PRTC--COMMANDO WARRIOR OPEN BAY STUDENT BARRACKS...................... $11,800 The President
Army Guard......................... Guam: BARRIGADA--COMBINED SUPPORT MAINT SHOP PH 1......................................... $19,000 The President
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Guam: AGANA NAVAL AIR STATION--HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT, INCR 2............................... $70,000 The President
Army............................... Italy: VICENZA--BDE COMPLEX--BARRACKS/COMMUNITY, INCR 4................................... $26,000 The President
Army............................... Italy: VICENZA--BDE COMPLEX--OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY, INCR 4.......................... $25,000 The President
Air Force.......................... Italy: AVIANO AB--AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQUADRON [ASOS] FACILITY......................... $10,200 The President
Air Force.......................... Italy: AVIANO AB--DORMITORY (144 RM)...................................................... $19,000 The President
Def-Wide--DLA...................... Japan: KADENA AB--INSTALL FUEL FILTERS-SEPARATORS......................................... $3,000 The President
Navy............................... Japan: ATSUGI--MH-60R/S TRAINER FACILITY.................................................. $6,908 The President
Air Force.......................... Korea: KUNSAN AB--CONSTRUCT DMT FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY................................. $7,500 The President
Army............................... Korea: CAMP WALKER--ELECTRICAL SYSTEM UPGRADE & NATURAL GAS SYSTEM........................ $19,500 The President
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... Puerto Rico: FORT BUCHANAN--ANTILLES ES/IS--REPLACE SCHOOL................................ $58,708 The President
Army Guard......................... Puerto Rico: CAMP SANTIAGO--LIVE FIRE SHOOT HOUSE......................................... $3,100 The President
Army Guard......................... Puerto Rico: CAMP SANTIAGO--MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE................................ $9,200 The President
Air Force.......................... Qatar: AL UDEID--BLATCHFORD-PRESTON COMPLEX PH III........................................ $62,300 The President
Def-Wide--NSA...................... Qatar: AL UDEID--QATAR WAREHOUSE.......................................................... $1,961 The President
Navy............................... Spain: ROTA--AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER.................................................... $23,190 The President
Air Force.......................... United Kingdom: RAF MILDENHALL--EXTEND TAXIWAY ALPHA...................................... $15,000 The President
Def-Wide--DLA...................... United Kingdom: RAF MILDENHALL--RPL HYDRANT FUEL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM...................... $15,900 The President
Def-Wide--DODEA.................... United Kingdom: ROYAL AIR FORCE ALCONBURY--ALCONBURY ES REPLACEMENT....................... $30,308 The President
Def-Wide--NSA...................... United Kingdom: MENWITH HILL STATION--MHS PSC CONSTRUCTION--GENERATORS 10 & D11........... $2,000 The President
Army Guard......................... Virgin Islands: ST. CROIX--READINESS CENTER [JFHQ]........................................ $25,000 The President
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MILITARY AND FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
Army Family Housing Construction... Alaska: Fort Wainwright--Family Housing Replacement Construction.......................... $21,000 The President
Army Family Housing Construction... Germany: Baumholder--Family Housing Replacement Construction.............................. $34,329 The President
Army Construction Improvements..... Pennsylvania: Carlisle Barracks--Family Housing Privatization............................. $15,000 The President
Army Construction Improvements..... Virginia: Fort Eustis--Family Housing Privatization....................................... $20,000 The President
Navy Family Housing Construction... Cuba: Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay--Replace Base Housing, 71 Units at Various Sites...... $37,169 The President
Navy Family Construction Japan: CFA Sasebo--Revitalization of Family Housing Townhomes............................. $10,769 The President
Improvements.
Navy Family Construction Japan: CFA Yokosuka--Revitalization of Family Housing Apartments.......................... $17,479 The President
Improvements.
Navy Family Construction California: MCB Camp Pendleton--Camp Pendleton PPV, Phase 8............................... $26,748 The President
Improvements.
Navy Family Construction Washington, D.C.: Marine Barracks 8th & I--Replace Interior Passenger Lift Quarters #6.... $100 The President
Improvements.
Navy Family Construction North Carolina: Camp Lejeune--Camp Lejeune PPV Phase 7 with DODDS addition................ $79,908 The President
Improvements.
Navy Family Construction Japan: Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni--Whole House Revitalization Midrise 906........... $11,016 The President
Improvements.
Air Force Family Construction Japan: Kadena AB--Improve Family Housing, Phase 11 (403 units)............................ $73,800 The President
Improvements.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 2005
Defense-Wide--NGA.................. Virginia: Fort Belvoir--NGA Headquarters Facility......................................... $83,328 The President
Defense-Wide--TMA.................. Maryland: Bethesda [WRNMMC]--Traffic Mitigation, Increment 2.............................. $7,600 The President
Defense-Wide--TMA.................. Maryland: Bethesda [WRNMMC]--Defense Access Roads--Medical Center Entrance................ $20,000 The President
Defense-Wide--TMA.................. Texas: Fort Sam Houston--San Antonio Military Medical Center--North, Increment 4.......... $93,941 The President
Defense-Wide--TMA.................. Virginia: Fort Belvoir--Hospital Replacement, Increment 5................................. $63,637 The President
Defense-Wide--WHS.................. Virginia: Fort Belvoir--Office Complex, Increment 4....................................... $5,610 The President
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, CONSTRUCTION, MAJOR PROJECTS
Agency--Veterans Health California: Palo Alto--Polytrauma/Ambulatory Care Replacement............................. $30,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Administration.
Agency--Veterans Health California: Alameda Point--Outpatient Clinic and Columbarium (Design)..................... $17,332 The President, Senator Feinstein
Administration.
Agency--Veterans Health Colorado: Denver--New Medical Facility.................................................... $450,700 The President, Senators Michael Bennet and Mark
Administration. Udall
Agency--Veterans Health Louisiana: New Orleans--New Medical Facility.............................................. $310,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
Administration.
Agency--Veterans Health Nebraska: Omaha--Hospital Replacement Facility (Design)................................... $56,000 The President, Senator Ben Nelson
Administration.
Agency--National Cemetery California: Los Angeles--Columbarium Expansion............................................ $27,600 The President, Senator Feinstein
Administra- tion.
Agency--National Cemetery Pennsylvania: Indiantown Gap--Gravesite Expansion and Cemetery Improvements--Phase 4...... $23,500 The President, Senators Specter and Casey
Administra- tion.
Agency--National Cemetery Washington: Tahoma--Gravesite Expansion and Cemetery Improvements--Phase 2................ $25,800 The President, Senator Murray
Administra- tion.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--ARMY AVIATION HQ FACILITIES\1\.............................. $19,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--BARRACKS\1\................................................. $18,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--C-IED TASK FORCE COMPOUND................................... $24,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--COMMAND & CONTROL FACILITY.................................. $13,600 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--CONSOLIDATED COMMUNITY SUPPORT AREA\1\...................... $14,800 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--DINING FACILITY............................................. $6,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--EASTSIDE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION\1\......................... $10,400 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--EASTSIDE UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE\1\........................ $29,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--ENTRY CONTROL POINT\1\...................................... $7,500 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--JOINT DEFENSE OPERATIONS CENTER\1\.......................... $2,800 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--MP HQ....................................................... $5,580 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--REPLACE TEMPORARY GUARD TOWERS.............................. $6,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--ROLE III HOSPITAL........................................... $42,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--TASK FORCE FREEDOM COMPOUND................................. $18,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--TROOP HOUSING, PH 4......................................... $23,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--TROOP HOUSING, PH 5......................................... $29,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--TROOP HOUSING, PH 6......................................... $29,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--TROOP HOUSING, PH 7......................................... $29,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--TROOP HOUSING, PH 8......................................... $29,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--VET CLINIC & KENNEL......................................... $2,600 The President
Air Force.......................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--CONSOLIDATED RIGGING FACILITY\1\............................ $9,900 The President
Air Force.......................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--FIGHTER HANGAR\1\........................................... $16,480 The President
Air Force.......................... Afghanistan: BAGRAM AIR BASE--MEDEVAC RAMP EXPANSION/FIRE STATION\1\...................... $16,580 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: DWYER--COMMAND & CONTROL FACILITY............................................ $5,200 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: DWYER--DINING FACILITY....................................................... $9,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: DWYER--ROTARY WING APRON..................................................... $44,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: DWYER--WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY......................................... $16,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: FRONTENAC--WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPLEX.......................................... $4,200 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: FRONTENAC--WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY..................................... $4,200 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: KANDAHAR--SOF JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER........................................ $6,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: KANDAHAR--TROOP HOUSING, PH 4................................................ $20,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: KANDAHAR--TROOP HOUSING, PH 5................................................ $20,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: KANDAHAR--TROOP HOUSING, PH 6................................................ $20,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: KANDAHAR--TROOP HOUSING, PH D7............................................... $20,000 The President
Air Force.......................... Afghanistan: KANDAHAR--EXPAND CARGO HANDLING AREA......................................... $7,100 The President
Air Force.......................... Afghanistan: KANDAHAR--EXPEDITIONARY AIRLIFT SHELTER...................................... $7,400 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: MAYWAND--WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY....................................... $7,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: SHANK--AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT............................................... $23,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: SHANK--EXPAND ECP 1 AND ECP 2................................................ $9,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: SHANK--GUARD TOWERS.......................................................... $2,400 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: SHANK--ROADS AND UTILITIES, PH 1............................................. $25,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: SHARANA--BULK MATERIALS TRANSFER STATION..................................... $12,400 The President
Air Force.......................... Afghanistan: SHINDAND--PASSENGER & CARGO TERMINAL......................................... $15,800 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: TARIN KOWT--ROTARY WING PARKING AND TAXIWAY, PH 2............................ $24,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: TARIN KOWT--WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY.................................... $4,200 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION--CONTINGENCY HOUSING....................................... $41,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION--DINING FACILITY........................................... $27,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION--ROTARY WING PARKING....................................... $35,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION--WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY............................. $13,000 The President
Air Force.......................... Afghanistan: TOMBSTONE/BASTION--EXPAND FUELS OPERATIONS AND STORAGE....................... $2,500 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: VARIOUS LOCATIONS--ROUTE GYPSUM, PH 1........................................ $49,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: WOLVERINE--ENTRY CONTROL POINT............................................... $5,100 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: WOLVERINE--PERIMETER FENCE................................................... $5,100 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: WOLVERINE--ROTARY WING APRON................................................. $24,000 The President
Army............................... Afghanistan: WOLVERINE--WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY..................................... $13,000 The President
Def-Wide........................... WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED--Classified Project................................................. $41,900 The President
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Projects requested in the fiscal year 2011 base Milcon budget.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
[Dollars in thousands]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Account Project Funding Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Guard......................... Alabama: Fort McClellan--Live Fire Shoot House............................................ $5,635 Senators Shelby and Sessions
Air Guard.......................... Alabama: Montgomery Regional Airport ANGB--Replace Squad Ops Facility..................... $7,500 Senators Shelby and Sessions
Army............................... Alaska: Fort Richardson--Physical Fitness Center [P&D].................................... $2,700 Senators Begich and Murkowski
Air Force.......................... Alaska: Elmendorf Air Force Base--DOD Joint Regional Fire Training Facility............... $6,600 Senators Begich and Murkowski
Air Guard.......................... Alaska: Eielson Air Force Base--Add/Alter Communications Facility......................... $6,500 Senators Begich and Murkowski
Army Guard......................... Arkansas: Camp Robinson--Regional Training Institute, Ph 2 [P&D].......................... $1,900 Senators Pryor and Lincoln
Army Guard......................... Arkansas: Fort Chafee--Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point Range......................... $3,500 Senators Pryor and Lincoln
Air Guard.......................... Arkansas: Little Rock Air Force Base--Fuel Cell and Corrosion Control Hanger.............. $10,400 Senators Pryor and Lincoln
Air Force.......................... California: Edwards AFB--Flightline Fire Station.......................................... $15,500 Senators Feinstein and Boxer
Army Guard......................... California: Mather AASF--Renewable Photovoltaic Solar Power (Minor)....................... $1,466 Senators Feinstein and Boxer
Army Guard......................... California: Ventura AFRC--Renewable Photovoltaic Solar Power (Minor)...................... $1,466 Senators Feinstein and Boxer
Army Guard......................... California: Los Alamitos AFRC--Renewable Photovoltaic Solar Power (Minor)................. $1,466 Senators Feinstein and Boxer
Army Guard......................... California: Banning RC--Renewable Photovoltaic Solar Power (Minor)........................ $1,466 Senators Feinstein and Boxer
Air Force.......................... Colorado: Buckley Air Force Base--Land Acquisition........................................ $10,000 Senators Mark Bennet and Mark Udall
Navy............................... Connecticut: NSB New London--Submarine Group Two Headquarters............................. $12,930 Senators Dodd and Lieberman
Air Guard.......................... Delaware: New Castle County Airport--C-130 Aircraft Maintenance Shops, Ph 3............... $8,700 Senators Carper and Kaufman
Navy............................... Florida: NSA Panama City--Land Acquisition--9 acres....................................... $5,960 Senator Bill Nelson
Air Force.......................... Florida: Patrick Air Force Base--Relocate Main Gate....................................... $8,000 Senator Bill Nelson
Army............................... Georgia: Fort Benning--Chapel, Sand Hill [P&D]............................................ $550 Senator Chambliss
Army............................... Georgia: Fort Gordon--Qualification Training Range........................................ $8,100 Senators Chambliss and Isakson
Army............................... Hawaii: Pohakuloa Training Area--Defense Access Road [P&D]................................ $1,200 Senators Inouye and Akaka
Navy............................... Hawaii: Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard--Welding School Shop Consolidation.................... $8,500 Senators Inouye and Akaka
Navy............................... Hawaii: Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard--Fire Station, West Loch.............................. $9,084 Senators Inouye and Akaka
Navy............................... Hawaii: Pacific Missile Range Facility--Replace North Loop Electrical Distribution System. $9,100 Senators Inouye and Akaka
Navy............................... Hawaii: Pacific Missile Range Facility--Construct Prefabricated Bridge at Nohili Ditch.... $3,560 Senators Inouye and Akaka
Air Force.......................... Idaho: Mountain Home Air Force Base--Civil Engineer Maintenance Complex [P&D]............. $2,000 Senators Crapo and Risch
Army Reserve....................... Illinois: Rockford USARC--United States Army Reserve Center............................... $13,200 Senators Durbin and Burris
Army Guard......................... Iowa: Camp Dodge--Combined Arms Collective Training Facility.............................. $5,700 Senators Harkin and Grassley
Air Guard.......................... Iowa: Bud Day Field--Add/Alt Security Police Facility (Minor)............................. $1,950 Senator Harkin
Air Guard.......................... Iowa: Des Moines--Corrosion Control Hangar................................................ $4,700 Senators Harkin and Grassley
Army Guard......................... Kansas: Forbes Field--Taxiway Alterations................................................. $9,036 Senators Brownback and Roberts
Army............................... Kentucky: Fort Campbell--Infantry Squad Battle Course..................................... $3,000 Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: Fort Campbell--Shoot House...................................................... $3,300 Senator McConnell
Army............................... Kentucky: Fort Knox--Rail Head Upgrade.................................................... $18,000 Senator McConnell
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Kentucky: Fort Campbell--Landgraf Hangar Addition, 160th SOAR............................. $3,600 Senator Alexander
Army............................... Louisiana: Fort Polk--Emergency Services Center........................................... $9,200 Senators Landrieu and Vitter
Air Guard.......................... Louisiana: NAS-Joint Reserve Base--Alert Facility [P&D]................................... $2,000 Senator Landrieu
Navy............................... Maine: Portsmouth Naval Shipyard--Consolidation of Structural Shops....................... $17,240 Senators Collins, Snowe, Gregg and Shaheen
Navy............................... Maryland: Indian Head--Advanced Energetics Research Lab Complex, Ph 2..................... $12,810 Senators Mikulski and Cardin
Army Guard......................... Massachusetts: Chicopee Armory--Armory Addition (Minor)................................... $1,554 Senator Kerry
Air Guard.......................... Massachusetts: Barnes Municipal Airport--Additions and Renovations to Building 15......... $6,000 Senator Kerry
Army Guard......................... Michigan: Camp Grayling Range--Barracks Replacement, Ph 2................................. $17,102 Senators Levin and Stabenow
Army Guard......................... Michigan: Camp Grayling Range--Light Demolition Range..................................... $1,595 Senators Levin and Stabenow
Air Guard.......................... Michigan: Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center--Replace Troop Quarters, Ph 2........... $9,600 Senators Levin and Stabenow
Air Force.......................... Minnesota: Minneapolis--Simulation Facility Expansion (Minor)............................. $1,900 Senators Franken and Klobuchar
Army Guard......................... Minnesota: Bloomington--Add/Alt Armory (Minor)............................................ $1,986 Senators Franken and Klobuchar
Navy............................... Mississippi: NCBC Gulfport--Branch Health Clinic.......................................... $11,870 Senators Cochran and Wicker
Def-Wide--TMA...................... Mississippi: Gulfport--Health Clinic [P&D]................................................ $2,700 Senator Cochran
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Mississippi: Stennis Space Center--SOF Western Maneuver Area, Ph 2........................ $9,000 Senators Cochran and Wicker
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... Mississippi: Stennis Space Center--SOF Western Maneuver Area, Ph 3........................ $8,000 Senators Cochran and Wicker
Army Guard......................... Missouri: Fort Leonard Wood--Regional Training Institute, Ph 1............................ $13,800 Senator Bond
Air Force.......................... Montana: Malmstrom AFB--Physical Fitness Center, Ph 2..................................... $8,000 Senators Tester and Baucus
Air Force.......................... Nebraska: Offutt Air Force Base--Kenney/Bellevue Gates.................................... $11,000 Senator Ben Nelson
Army Guard......................... Nebraska: Lincoln Airport--Road Infrastructure [P&D]...................................... $240 Senator Ben Nelson
Air Guard.......................... Nebraska: Lincoln Airport--Road Infrastructure [P&D]...................................... $210 Senator Ben Nelson
Navy............................... Nevada: NAS Fallon--NSAWC Security Upgrades (Minor)....................................... $1,480 Senator Reid
Air Force.......................... Nevada: Nellis Air Force Base--Facility Repair/Fitness Rec Center (Minor)................. $867 Senator Reid
Air Force.......................... Nevada: Nellis Air Force Base--Communication Network Control Center....................... $11,400 Senators Reid and Ensign
Army Guard......................... Nevada: Nellis Air Force Base--CAT-M Range modernization (Minor).......................... $2,000 Senators Reid and Ensign
Army Guard......................... Nevada: Las Vegas ARNG--Field Maintenance Shop............................................ $22,998 Senators Reid and Ensign
Air Guard.......................... New Jersey: Atlantic City IAP--Fuel Cell Maintenance Dock and Corrosion Control Hangar.... $8,500 Senators Lautenberg and Menendez
Air Force.......................... New Mexico: Cannon AFB--Family Support Center............................................. $4,050 Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Air Force.......................... New Mexico: Kirtland AFB--Military Working Dog Facility................................... $4,400 Senators Bingaman and Tom Udall
Army............................... New York: Fort Drum--Construct Railhead Loading Area...................................... $7,600 Senators Schumer and Gillibrand
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... North Carolina: Fort Bragg--SOF Baffle Containment for Range 19C.......................... $7,200 Senators Hagan and Burr
Def-Wide--SOCOM.................... North Carolina: Fort Bragg--SOF Medical Clinic Addition................................... $3,889 Senators Hagan and Burr
Air Force.......................... North Dakota: Grand Forks AFB--Central Deployment Center.................................. $16,500 Senators Conrad and Dorgan
Air Guard.......................... Ohio: Blue Ash ANG--Renovate Building #2 (Minor).......................................... $2,000 Senators Sherrod Brown and Voinovich
Air Guard.......................... Ohio: Toledo Airport--Replace Security Forces Complex..................................... $7,300 Senators Sherrod Brown and Voinovich
Air Force.......................... Oklahoma: Altus AFB--Fire Station [P&D]................................................... $2,000 Senator Inhofe
Air Force.......................... Oklahoma: Tinker AFB--Air Traffic Control Tower........................................... $9,300 Senator Inhofe
Air Guard.......................... Oregon: Kingsley Field ANG Base, Klamath Falls--Replace Fire Station...................... $7,000 Senators Wyden and Merkley
Navy............................... Pennsylvania: Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg--North Gate Security Improvements...... $5,930 Senators Specter and Casey
Navy............................... Pennsylvania: Philadelphia Annex--Quiet Propulsion Load House............................. $7,630 Senators Specter and Casey
Navy............................... Rhode Island: Newport--Submarine Payloads Integration Laboratory.......................... $12,170 Senator Reed
Navy............................... Rhode Island: Newport--Gate Improvements.................................................. $4,950 Senator Reed
Army Guard......................... Rhode Island: Quonset State Airport--Battalion Readiness Center [P&D]..................... $3,729 Senator Reed
Army Guard......................... Rhode Island: Middletown Armory--Armory Addition [P&D].................................... $302 Senator Reed
Air Guard.......................... Rhode Island: Quonset State Airport--C-130 Parking Apron.................................. $1,800 Senator Reed
Air Guard.......................... South Carolina: McEntire JRB--Joint Deployment Processing and Readiness Center, Ph 1...... $9,100 Senator Graham
Air Force.......................... South Dakota: Ellsworth AFB--Maintenance Training Facility................................ $12,400 Senators Johnson and Thune
Army Guard......................... South Dakota: Sioux Falls--Firing Range and Supporting Facilities [P&D]................... $151 Senators Johnson and Thune
Air Guard.......................... South Dakota: Joe Foss Field--Aircraft Maintenance Shops.................................. $12,800 Senators Johnson and Thune
Air Guard.......................... Tennessee: McGhee Tyson Air National Guard Base--Hobbs Road Acquisition................... $6,500 Senator Alexander
Air Force.......................... Texas: Randolph AFB--Fire Crash Rescue Station............................................ $13,000 Senators Hutchison and Cornyn
Army Reserve....................... Texas: Fort Hood--Army Reserve Center..................................................... $15,500 Senator Hutchison
Air Force.......................... Utah: Hill Air Force Base--Consolidated Transportation Facilities, Ph 1................... $7,300 Senators Bob Bennett and Hatch
Air Guard.......................... Vermont: Burlington International Airport--Upgrade Taxiways and Replace Arm/Disarm Pads, $11,000 Senators Leahy and Sanders
Ph 1.
Navy............................... Virginia: Dahlgren NSCW--Missile Support Facility Replacement, Ph 1....................... $9,730 Senators Webb and Warner
Air Force.......................... Washington: Fairchild AFB--Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory Facility............ $4,850 Senator Murray
Air Force.......................... Washington: McChord AFB--Collocated Chapel/Family Support Center, Ph 1.................... $10,400 Senator Murray
Army Guard......................... Washington: Fort Lewis--Modification of Aviation Support Facility [P&D]................... $473 Senators Murray and Cantwell
Army Guard......................... West Virginia: Eleanor ARNG Complex--Emergency Generator (Minor).......................... $2,000 Senator Rockefeller
Army Guard......................... West Virginia: Camp Dawson--Mail/ID Center (Minor)........................................ $1,990 Senator Rockefeller
Army Guard......................... West Virginia: Camp Dawson--Utility Upgrade (Minor)....................................... $1,980 Senator Rockefeller
Army Guard......................... West Virginia: Camp Dawson--JITEC Emergency Power Generation (Minor)...................... $1,999 Senator Rockefeller
Army Guard......................... West Virginia: Morgantown--Parachute Rigging Facility [P&D]............................... $1,000 Senator Rockefeller
Army Guard......................... West Virginia: Buckhannon--Field Maintenance Shop [P&D]................................... $1,500 Senator Rockefeller
Air Guard.......................... West Virginia: Yeager Airbase--Force Protection/Antiterrorism............................. $13,000 Senator Rockefeller
Air Guard.......................... West Virginia: Yeager Airbase--Communications Training Facility........................... $6,250 Senator Rockefeller
Air Guard.......................... Wisconsin: General Mitchell IAP--Replace Fire Station..................................... $8,300 Senator Kohl
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, CONSTRUCTION MAJOR PROJECTS
Agency--Veterans Health West Virginia: Beckley--Nursing Home Care Unit............................................ 46,550 Senator Inouye
Administration.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2011
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate Committee recommendation
compared with (+ or -)
Item 2010 Budget estimate Committee ---------------------------------
appropriation recommendation 2010
appropriation Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Military construction, Army........................................ 3,719,419 4,078,798 3,797,521 +78,102 -281,277
Military construction, Navy and Marine Corps....................... 3,769,003 3,879,104 3,667,922 -101,081 -211,182
Military construction, Air Force................................... 1,450,426 1,311,385 1,378,688 -71,738 +67,303
Rescission..................................................... -37,500 ............... ............... +37,500 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................................................ 1,412,926 1,311,385 1,378,688 -34,238 +67,303
Military construction, Defense-Wide................................ 3,093,679 3,118,062 3,241,601 +147,922 +123,539
Rescission..................................................... -151,160 ............... ............... +151,160 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................................................ 2,942,519 3,118,062 3,241,601 +299,082 +123,539
====================================================================================
Total, Active components..................................... 11,843,867 12,387,349 12,085,732 +241,865 -301,617
Military construction, Army National Guard......................... 582,056 873,664 980,072 +398,016 +106,408
Military construction, Air National Guard.......................... 371,226 176,986 337,454 -33,772 +160,468
Military construction, Army Reserve................................ 431,566 318,175 347,916 -83,650 +29,741
Military construction, Navy Reserve................................ 125,874 61,557 61,557 -64,317 ...............
Military construction, Air Force Reserve........................... 112,269 7,832 12,832 -99,437 +5,000
====================================================================================
Total, Reserve components.................................... 1,622,991 1,438,214 1,739,831 +116,840 +301,617
====================================================================================
Total, Military construction................................. 13,466,858 13,825,563 13,825,563 +358,705 ...............
Appropriations........................................... (13,655,518) (13,825,563) (13,825,563) (+170,045) ...............
Rescissions.............................................. (-188,660) ............... ............... (+188,660) ...............
Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program..... 197,414 258,884 258,884 +61,470 ...............
Family housing construction, Army.................................. 273,236 92,369 92,369 -180,867 ...............
Family housing operation and maintenance, Army..................... 523,418 518,140 518,140 -5,278 ...............
Family housing construction, Navy and Marine Corps................. 146,569 186,444 186,444 +39,875 ...............
Family housing operation and maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps.... 368,540 366,346 366,346 -2,194 ...............
Family housing construction, Air Force............................. 66,101 78,025 78,025 +11,924 ...............
Family housing operation and maintenance, Air Force................ 502,936 513,792 513,792 +10,856 ...............
Family housing construction, Defense-Wide.......................... 2,859 ............... ............... -2,859 ...............
Family housing operation and maintenance, Defense-Wide............. 49,214 50,464 50,464 +1,250 ...............
Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund.............. 2,600 1,096 1,096 -1,504 ...............
Homeowners assistance fund......................................... 323,225 16,515 16,515 -306,710 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, Family housing........................................ 2,258,698 1,823,191 1,823,191 -435,507 ...............
Appropriations........................................... (2,258,698) (1,823,191) (1,823,191) (-435,507) ...............
Rescissions.............................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Chemical demilitarization construction, Defense-Wide............... 151,541 124,971 124,971 -26,570 ...............
Base realignment and closure:
Base realignment and closure account, 1990..................... 496,768 360,474 360,474 -136,294 ...............
Base realignment and closure account, 2005..................... 7,455,498 2,354,285 2,354,285 -5,101,213 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................................................ 7,455,498 2,354,285 2,354,285 -5,101,213 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, Base realignment and closure.......................... 7,952,266 2,714,759 2,714,759 -5,237,507 ...............
General Reductions (Sec. 129):
Military Construction, Army.................................... -230,000 ............... ............... +230,000 ...............
Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps................... -235,000 ............... ............... +235,000 ...............
Military Construction, Air Force............................... -64,091 ............... ............... +64,091 ...............
General Rescissions (Secs 130):
Military Construction, Army.................................... -33,000 ............... ............... +33,000 ...............
Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps................... -51,468 ............... ............... +51,468 ...............
Military Construction, Defense-Wide............................ -93,268 ............... ............... +93,268 ...............
Military Construction, Army National Guard..................... -33,000 ............... ............... +33,000 ...............
Military Construction, Air National Guard...................... -7,000 ............... ............... +7,000 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, title I............................................... 23,279,950 18,747,368 18,747,368 -4,532,582 ...............
Appropriations........................................... (23,686,346) (18,747,368) (18,747,368) (-4,938,978) ...............
Rescissions.............................................. (-406,396) ............... ............... (+406,396) ...............
Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Veterans Benefits Administration
Compensation and pensions.......................................... 47,396,106 53,492,234 53,492,234 +6,096,128 ...............
Readjustment benefits.............................................. 9,232,369 10,440,245 10,440,245 +1,207,876 ...............
Veterans insurance and indemnities................................. 49,288 62,589 62,589 +13,301 ...............
Veterans housing benefit program fund (indefinite)................. 23,553 19,078 19,078 -4,475 ...............
(Limitation on direct loans)................................... (500) (500) (500) ............... ...............
Credit subsidy................................................. -133,000 -165,000 -165,000 -32,000 ...............
Administrative expenses........................................ 165,082 163,646 163,646 -1,436 ...............
Guaranteed Transitional Housing Loans for Homeless Veterans........ (750) ............... ............... (-750) ...............
Vocational rehabilitation loans program account.................... 29 48 48 +19 ...............
(Limitation on direct loans)................................... (2,298) (3,042) (3,042) (+744) ...............
Administrative expenses........................................ 328 337 337 +9 ...............
Native American veteran housing loan program account............... 664 707 707 +43 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, Veterans Benefits Administration...................... 56,734,419 64,013,884 64,013,884 +7,279,465 ...............
Veterans Health Administration
Medical services................................................... 34,707,500 ............... 100,000 -34,607,500 +100,000
Advance from prior year........................................ ............... (37,136,000) (37,136,000) (+37,136,000) ...............
Advance appropriation, fiscal year 2012........................ 37,136,000 39,649,985 39,649,985 +2,513,985 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 71,843,500 39,649,985 39,749,985 -32,093,515 +100,000
Medical support and compliance..................................... 4,930,000 ............... ............... -4,930,000 ...............
Advance from prior year........................................ ............... (5,307,000) (5,307,000) (+5,307,000) ...............
Advance appropriation, fiscal year 2012........................ 5,307,000 5,535,000 5,535,000 +228,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 10,237,000 5,535,000 5,535,000 -4,702,000 ...............
Medical facilities................................................. 4,859,000 ............... 20,000 -4,839,000 +20,000
Advance from prior year........................................ ............... (5,740,000) (5,740,000) (+5,740,000) ...............
Advance appropriation, fiscal year 2012........................ 5,740,000 5,426,000 5,426,000 -314,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 10,599,000 5,426,000 5,446,000 -5,153,000 +20,000
Medical and prosthetic research.................................... 581,000 590,000 590,000 +9,000 ...............
Medical care cost recovery collections:
Offsetting collections......................................... -2,954,000 -3,393,000 -3,393,000 -439,000 ...............
Appropriations (indefinite).................................... 2,954,000 3,393,000 3,393,000 +439,000 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, Veterans Health Administration........................ 93,260,500 51,200,985 51,320,985 -41,939,515 +120,000
Appropriations........................................... (45,077,500) (590,000) (710,000) (-44,367,500) (+120,000)
Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Advance from prior year.................................. ............... (48,183,000) (48,183,000) (+48,183,000) ...............
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2012................. (48,183,000) (50,610,985) (50,610,985) (+2,427,985) ...............
National Cemetery Administration
National Cemetery Administration................................... 250,000 250,504 250,504 +504 ...............
Departmental Administration
General operating expenses......................................... 2,086,707 2,588,389 ............... -2,086,707 -2,588,389
General operating expenses, VBA.................................... ............... ............... 2,148,776 +2,148,776 +2,148,776
General administration............................................. ............... ............... 439,613 +439,613 +439,613
Information technology systems..................................... 3,307,000 3,307,000 3,147,000 -160,000 -160,000
Office of Inspector General........................................ 109,000 109,367 111,867 +2,867 +2,500
Construction, major projects....................................... 1,194,000 1,151,036 1,197,586 +3,586 +46,550
Construction, minor projects....................................... 703,000 467,700 485,965 -217,035 +18,265
Grants for construction of State extended care facilities.......... 100,000 85,000 85,000 -15,000 ...............
Grants for the construction of State veterans cemeteries........... 46,000 46,000 46,000 ............... ...............
====================================================================================
Total, Departmental Administration........................... 7,545,707 7,754,492 7,661,807 +116,100 -92,685
Appropriations........................................... (7,545,707) (7,754,492) (7,661,807) (+116,100) (-92,685)
Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
Sec 229--General operating expenses, VBA........................... ............... ............... 23,584 +23,584 +23,584
====================================================================================
Total, title II.............................................. 157,790,626 123,219,865 123,270,764 -34,519,862 +50,899
Appropriations........................................... (109,607,626) (72,608,880) (72,659,779) (-36,947,847) (+50,899)
Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Advance from prior year.................................. ............... (48,183,000) (48,183,000) (+48,183,000) ...............
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2012................. (48,183,000) (50,610,985) (50,610,985) (+2,427,985) ...............
(Limitation on direct loans)............................. (2,798) (3,542) (3,542) (+744) ...............
Discretionary............................................ (101,222,310) (59,370,719) (59,421,618) (-41,800,692) (+50,899)
Mandatory................................................ (56,568,316) (63,849,146) (63,849,146) (+7,280,830) ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE III--RELATED AGENCIES
American Battle Monuments Commission
Salaries and expenses.............................................. 62,675 64,200 67,200 +4,525 +3,000
Foreign currency fluctuations account.............................. 17,100 20,200 20,200 +3,100 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, American Battle Monuments Commission.................. 79,775 84,400 87,400 +7,625 +3,000
U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Salaries and expenses.............................................. 27,115 90,147 53,297 +26,182 -36,850
Department of Defense--Civil
Cemeterial Expenses, Army
Salaries and expenses.............................................. 39,850 38,100 43,100 +3,250 +5,000
Armed Forces Retirement Home
Operation and maintenance.......................................... 62,000 69,200 69,200 +7,200 ...............
Capital program.................................................... 72,000 2,000 2,000 -70,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Armed Forces Retirement Home.......................... 134,000 71,200 71,200 -62,800 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, title III............................................. 280,740 283,847 254,997 -25,743 -28,850
(By transfer)............................................ ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE IV--OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
Military Construction, Army........................................ 924,484 929,996 1,045,676 +121,192 +115,680
Military Construction, Air Force................................... 474,500 280,506 164,826 -309,674 -115,680
Military Construction, Defense-Wide................................ ............... 46,500 46,500 +46,500 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, title IV.............................................. 1,398,984 1,257,002 1,257,002 -141,982 ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE V--GENERAL PROVISIONS
General operating expenses......................................... ............... 23,584 ............... ............... -23,584
====================================================================================
Total, title V............................................... ............... 23,584 ............... ............... -23,584
====================================================================================
Grand total.................................................. 182,750,300 143,531,666 143,530,131 -39,220,169 +1,535
Appropriations........................................... (133,574,712) (91,663,679) (91,662,144) (-41,912,568) (+1,535)
Rescissions.............................................. (-406,396) ............... ............... (+406,396) ...............
Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Advance from prior year.................................. ............... (48,183,000) (48,183,000) (+48,183,000) ...............
Advance appropriations, fiscal year 2012................. (48,183,000) (50,610,985) (50,610,985) (+2,427,985) ...............
Overseas contingency operations.......................... (1,398,984) (1,257,002) (1,257,002) (-141,982) ...............
(By transfer)............................................ ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
(Limitation on direct loans)............................. (2,798) (3,542) (3,542) (+744) ...............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------