[House Report 108-328] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] 108th Congress Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 108-328 ====================================================================== COAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND RETIRED EMPLOYEE ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY _______ October 28, 2003.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed _______ Mr. Pombo, from the Committee on Resources, submitted the following R E P O R T [To accompany H.R. 313] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Resources, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 313) to modify requirements relating to allocation of interest that accrues to the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund, having considered the same, report favorably thereon without amendment and recommend that the bill do pass. PURPOSE OF THE BILL The purpose of H.R. 313 to modify requirements relating to allocation of interest that accrues to the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund. BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (Public Law 95-87; 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.) established an abandoned coal mine reclamation (AML) fund supported by a fee on domestically produced coal. The fee was originally slated to expire in 1992, but Congress has twice extended the fee and it is now slated to expire on September 30, 2004 (Public Law 102- 486, Sec. 19143; 30 U.S.C. 1232). The Coal Act of 1992 established the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) Combined Benefits Fund (CBF) to pay for health care benefits for retired mine workers. Coal companies and companies that were coal companies and were signatories to retiree benefit programs pay for the health care premiums of these retirees. However, an ``unassigned beneficiaries'' class of UMWA retirees exists where no entity exists to pay their benefits. To protect the solvency of the CBF, Congress opted to allow the transfer to the CBF of not more than $70 million annually of interest from the unappropriated balance of the AML trust fund for the unassigned beneficiaries. This transfer, which is not subject to appropriation, is made after an annual audit calculates the necessary amount. The combination of rising health care costs and court decisions that have expanded the pool of unassigned beneficiaries is putting stress on the solvency of the CBF. H.R. 313 would lift the current $70 million limitation on the amount of interest that can be transferred to the CBF. It would not allow transfers of the principal in the AML fund to be transferred to the CBF. COMMITTEE ACTION H.R. 313 was introduced on January 8, 2003, by Congressman Nick J. Rahall (D-WV). The bill was referred to the Committee on Resources and within the Committee to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources. On October 1, 2003, the Full Resources Committee met to consider the bill. The Subcommittee was discharged from further consideration of the bill by unanimous consent. No amendments were offered and the bill was then ordered favorably reported to the House of Representatives by unanimous consent. COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding clause 2(b)(1) of rule X and clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Resources' oversight findings and recommendations are reflected in the body of this report. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT Article I, section 8 of the Constitution of the United States grants Congress the authority to enact this bill COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XIII 1. Cost of Legislation. Clause 3(d)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires an estimate and a comparison by the Committee of the costs which would be incurred in carrying out this bill. However, clause 3(d)(3)(B) of that Rule provides that this requirement does not apply when the Committee has included in its report a timely submitted cost estimate of the bill prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. 2. Congressional Budget Act. As required by clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, this bill does not contain any new budget authority, credit authority, or an increase or decrease in revenues or tax expenditures. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the transfer of funds from the AML to the CBF has no net budgetary effect. However, because of increased payments from the CBF, federal Medicaid spending would decrease by about $2 million per year beginning in 2005. From this, CBO concludes there would be a net increase in direct spending of $454 million over the 2005-2013 time period if additional appropriations for other purposes are not made from the AML fund after 2003. 3. General Performance Goals and Objectives. This bill does not authorize funding and therefore, clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives does not apply. 4. Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate. Under clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 403 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has received the following cost estimate for this bill from the Director of the Congressional Budget Office: U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC, October 16, 2003. Hon. Richard W. Pombo, Chairman, Committee on Resources, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Dear Mr. Chairman: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 313, the Coal Accountability and Retired Employee Act for the 21st Century. If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Tom Bradley. Sincerely, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Director. Enclosure. H.R. 313--Coal Accountability and Retired Employee Act for the 21st Century Summary: H.R. 313 would require the Office of Surface Mining to transfer any remaining interest credited to the Abandoned Mine Reclamation (AML) Fund to the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund (CBF) in the case of a deficit of net assets in that fund (that is, when expenditures exceed revenues in a particular year). CBO estimates that the CBF will record a deficit of net assets in 2004 and in each year thereafter. If the bill were enacted, CBO estimates that an additional $67 million in 2004 and about $500 million over the 2004-2013 period would be transferred to the CBF, assuming that the reclamation fees paid by coal companies to the AML Fund expire in 2004 as scheduled and that no discretionary appropriations are made from the fund after fiscal year 2003. By themselves, the transfers, from one federal budget account to another, would not affect the budget totals. The transfers would, however, provide additional resources to the CBF, which would otherwise run out of money to pay health benefits to retired mine workers and their dependents. CBO estimates that those transfers would have no effect on benefit payments in 2004 and would result in additional benefit payments of $472 million over the 2005-2013 period. In addition, because of the increased payments from the CBF, federal Medicaid spending would decline by about $2 million a year beginning in 2005. Therefore, CBO estimates that the net change in direct spending would be an increase of $454 million over the 2005-2013 period. H.R. 313 contains no private-sector or intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) and would reduce Medicaid spending by state governments. Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 313 is shown in Table 1. The costs of this legislation fall within budget function 550 (health). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By fiscal year, in millions of dollars-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANGES IN DIRECT SPENDING Additional Spending from the CBF: Estimated Budget Authority............ 0 69 64 60 54 49 46 45 43 41 Estimated Outlays..................... 0 69 64 60 54 49 46 45 43 41 Federal Share of Medicaid: Estimated Budget Authority............ 0 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 Estimated Outlays..................... 0 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 Net Effect on Federal Spending: Estimated Budget Authority............ 0 67 62 58 52 47 44 43 41 39 Estimated Outlays..................... 0 67 62 58 52 47 44 43 41 39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Basis of estimate: The Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund is supported by a fee on domestically produced coal, and a portion of the interest credited to that fund each year is transferred to the Combined Benefit Fund to provide health benefits for certain retired mine workers and their dependents. Under current law, the transfer of interest earnings is capped at $70 million a year. H.R. 313 would remove that cap and would allow interest transfers to be made to offset any deficits in the CBF. CBO estimates that the CBF will run a deficit of more than $500 million over the 2004-2013 period because the cost of providing health benefits has been growing more rapidly than the premiums collected by the fund. If the bill is enacted, CBO estimates that an additional $67 million would be transferred in 2004 to cover deficits in 2003 and 2004. Although the CBF is privately administered, revenues to the fund and outlays from the fund are recorded on the federal budget. The payments to the fund--health insurance premiums paid by certain coal producers--are mandated by the government, and the benefits paid by the fund are a federal entitlement program. Therefore, the transfer of funds from the AML to the CBF is an intragovernmental transaction and, by itself, has no net budgetary effect. The budgetary impact of H.R. 313 would not be the transfer itself, but the additional benefits that would be paid from the CBF as a result of the transfer. In the event of a deficit, the trustees of the CBF will first try to balance the fund by reducing spending on items and services other than health benefits. But if the deficit is large enough, they will have to cut benefits. CBO estimates that the fund will have to reduce benefits starting in 2005 and will need to cut $472 million in benefits over the 2005-2013 period under current law--that is, with transfers limited to $790 million a year. This cost estimate assumes that no appropriations are made from the AML Fund after 2003, and that the fund receives no additional income after 2004 from taxes on companies producing coal. (Under current law, those taxes expire on September 30, 2004.) On that basis, CBO estimates that there would be enough interest available in the AML Fund to cover net deficits in the CBF so that no benefits would be cut through 2013 if H.R. 313 were enacted. Thus, the transfer of interest from the AML Fund to cover net deficits in the CBF would enable the CBF to avoid reducing benefits, and therefore, would increase direct spending by $472 million over the 2005-2013 period. The result would be different if additional appropriations for other purposes were made from the AML Fund after 2003. If appropriations continue at the 2003 level (without extension of the taxes), the AML Fund would gradually be depleted and the sums available for transfer to the CBF would decline over time. After a few years, benefit payments would have to be reduced. Under that scenario, enactment of H.R. 313 would not add to aggregate spending over the 2005-2013 period. For beneficiaries who are also enrolled in Medicaid, a loss of benefits from the CBF would shift costs to the Medicaid program. Because this legislation would eliminate the need to reduce health benefits paid from the CBF, it would reduce the health care costs that would have to be paid by Medicaid. CBO estimates that this change would decrease federal Medicaid spending by $2 million in 2005 and $18 million over the 2005- 2013 period. Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: This bill contains no new intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in UMRA. Because additional resources in the Combined Benefit Fund would provide health benefits to eligible beneficiaries, Medicaid spending would decrease. Consequently, CBO estimates that states' share of those savings would total about $1 million in 2005 and $14 million over the 2005-2013 period. Estimate prepared by: Federal Costs: AML and CBF Funds--Tom Bradley; Medicaid--Eric Rollins; Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Leo Lex; Impact on the Private Sector: Cecil McPherson. Estimate Approved by: Robert A. Sunshine, Assistant Director for Budget Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC LAW 104-4 This bill contains no unfunded mandates. PREEMPTION OF STATE, LOCAL OR TRIBAL LAW This bill is not intended to preempt any State, local or tribal law. CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW If enacted, this bill would make no changes in existing law.