Select for larger view. | 1 | Weldon Spring Site Remedial Action Project | |
| Covers 229 acres, 20 miles west of St. Louis | ||
| Site composed of the Chemical Plant and the Quarry | ||
| Established in the 1940s as an ordnance works for the U.S. Army | ||
| Processed uranium ore in the 1950s and 1960s in support of nuclear energy development | ||
| Processing plant activities ceased in the late 1960s | ||
| Cleanup is jointly funded by the Department of the Army | ||
| Will contain a permanent disposal cell for waste removed during cleanup |
2 Latty Avenue (FUSRAP) Properties - Located in northern St. Louis County, the site includes three areas: the Hazelwood Interim Storage Site, the Futura Coatings Site, and eight vicinity properties. Low-level contamination originated from residues from the nearby St. Louis Downtown Site that previously were stored at the Latty Avenue Site 3 St. Louis Airport (FUSRAP) Site and Vicinity Properties - Located 15 miles from downtown St. Louis, this site stored uranium processing residues from 1946 to 1966 4 St. Louis Downtown (FUSRAP) Site - 45 acre site, which operated from 1942 to 1957 and produced more than 50,000 tons of natural uranium products OTHER SITES 5 Kansas City Plant - 300 acre site located 12 miles south of downtown Kansas City, MO. The site has been used to manufacture nonnuclear components for nuclear weapons |
The Office of Environmental Management currently is formulating its FY 1999 budget and encourages public comment. The public comment period is open through July 18, 1997.
The current outyear targets for EM are $5.5 billion for FY 1999 through FY 2002, plus specified additional amounts for privatization. The Office of Management and Budget will re-examine these targets for the program for FY 1999 and beyond based on EM’s analyses of the program at $5.5 and $6.0 billion planning levels. Additionally, the recent agreement between the President and the Congressional leadership to balance the Federal budget by 2002 will directly affect the level of the EM budget for FY 1999 through FY 2002. Future budgets for EM will be required to be consistent with this agreement. |
EM is proposing a strategy to accelerate site cleanup and improve productivity, with a focus on completing work at as many sites as possible by 2006. Stated goals are selected summaries of the proposals for acceleration contained in the discussion drafts of the EM site plans accompanying the EM report, Accelerating Cleanup: Focus on 2006, which is available for public comment.
All environmental restoration will be complete by FY 2006. Surveillance and monitoring will continue at some sites beyond FY 2006. |
Missouri Sites are Managed by the Oak Ridge Operations Office
Missouri FUSRAP Sites
Sites Managed by the Albuquerque Operations Office
|
Accomplishment of EM goals depends on achievement of enhanced performance objectives, future funding levels, and Departmental programmatic decisions. EM is committed to full compliance with environmental and other legal requirements. The Department of Energy will request sufficient funds to comply with environmental requirements. EM also intends to meet its commitments to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. EM could achieve compliance at the $6.0 billion planning scenario at all sites if enhanced performances are achieved, but schedule and funding modifications may be necessary at some sites. At the $5.5 billion planning level, achieving compliance would be more difficult at several sites even with enhanced performance, and many other high-priority activities would not be possible.
Last Updated 06/16/97 (mas)