[Senate Report 110-416]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
Calendar No. 876
110th Congress Report
SENATE
2d Session 110-416
======================================================================
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2009
_______
July 14, 2008.--Ordered to be printed
_______
Mr. Dorgan, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following
REPORT
[To accompany S. 3258]
The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 3258)
making appropriations for energy and water development and
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009,
and for other purposes, favorably thereon and recommends that
the bill do pass.
Amount in new budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2009
Total of bill as reported to the Senate................. $33,767,000,000
Amount of 2008 appropriations........................... 31,508,398,000
Amount of 2009 budget estimate.......................... 31,695,700,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
2008 appropriations................................. +2,258,602,000
2009 budget estimate................................ +2,071,300,000
CONTENTS
----------
Page
Purpose.......................................................... 4
Summary of Estimates and Recommendations......................... 4
Title I:
Department of Defense--Civil: Department of the Army:
Corps of Engineers--Civil:
General Investigations............................... 21
Construction, General................................ 33
Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries..... 53
Operation and Maintenance, General................... 56
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies................ 79
Regulatory Program................................... 79
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program...... 80
General Expenses..................................... 81
General Provisions--Corps of Engineers--Civil........ 83
Title II:
Department of the Interior:
Central Utah Project Completion Account.................. 85
Bureau of Reclamation:
Water and Related Resources.......................... 85
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.............. 93
California Bay-Delta Restoration..................... 94
Policy and Administration............................ 94
General Provisions--Department of the Interior........... 94
Title III:
Department of Energy:
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy................... 97
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.......... 104
Nuclear Energy....................................... 105
Fossil Energy Research and Development............... 107
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves............... 110
Strategic Petroleum Reserve.......................... 110
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve................... 110
Energy Information Administration.................... 110
Non-defense Environmental Cleanup........................ 111
Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning
Fund................................................... 113
Science.................................................. 113
High Energy Physics.................................. 113
Nuclear Physics...................................... 114
Biological and Environmental Research................ 114
Basic Energy Sciences................................ 116
Nuclear Waste Disposal................................... 118
Departmental Administration.............................. 119
Office of Inspector General.............................. 120
Atomic Energy Defense Activities:
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Weapons Activities............................... 120
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................. 127
Naval Reactors................................... 129
Office of the Administrator...................... 129
Environmental and Other Defense Activities:
Defense Environmental Cleanup........................ 129
Other Defense Activities............................. 133
Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal....................... 133
Power Marketing Administrations:
Operation and Maintenance, Southeastern Power
Administration................................. 134
Operation and Maintenance, Southwestern Power
Administration................................. 134
Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and
Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration. 134
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Salaries and
Expenses........................................... 135
General Provisions--Department of Energy................. 157
Title IV:
Independent Agencies:
Appalachian Regional Commission.......................... 158
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.................. 159
Delta Regional Authority................................. 159
Denali Commission........................................ 159
Nuclear Regulatory Commission............................ 159
Office of Inspector General.......................... 160
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board..................... 160
Tennessee Valley Authority Office of the Inspector
General................................................ 161
Title V: General Provisions...................................... 162
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 163
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules
of the
Senate......................................................... 163
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of
the
Senate......................................................... 164
Budgetary Impact Statement....................................... 173
Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Items............ 173
PURPOSE
The purpose of this bill is to provide appropriations for
the fiscal year 2009 beginning October 1, 2008, and ending
September 30, 2009, for energy and water development, and for
other related purposes. It supplies funds for water resources
development programs and related activities of the Department
of the Army, Civil Functions--U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'
Civil Works Program in title I; for the Department of the
Interior's Bureau of Reclamation in title II; for the
Department of Energy's energy research activities, including
environmental restoration and waste management, and atomic
energy defense activities of the National Nuclear Security
Administration in title III; and for related independent
agencies and commissions, including the Appalachian Regional
Commission, Delta Regional Authority, Denali Commission, and
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in title IV.
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The fiscal year 2009 budget estimates for the bill total
$31,695,700,000 in new budget (obligational) authority. The
recommendation of the Committee totals $33,767,000,000. This is
$2,071,300,000 above the budget estimates and $2,258,602,000
above the enacted appropriation for the current fiscal year.
Subcommittee Hearings
The Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water held
six sessions in connection with the fiscal year 2009
appropriation bill. Witnesses included officials and
representatives of the Federal agencies under the
subcommittee's jurisdiction.
The recommendations for fiscal year 2009 therefore, have
been developed after careful consideration of available data.
Votes in the Committee
By a vote of 28 to 10 the Committee on July 10, 2008,
recommended that the bill, as amended, be reported to the
Senate.
TITLE I
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
INTRODUCTION
The Corps of Engineers is made up of approximately 35,000
civilian and 650 military members that perform both military
and civil works functions. The military and civilian engineers,
scientists and other specialists work hand in hand as leaders
in engineering and environmental matters. The diverse workforce
of biologists, engineers, geologists, hydrologists, natural
resource managers and other professionals meets the demands of
changing times and requirements as a vital part of America's
Army.
The Corps' mission is to provide quality, responsive
engineering services to the Nation including:
--Planning, designing, building and operating water resources
and other civil works projects. (Navigation, Flood
Control, Environmental Protection, Disaster Response,
et cetera)
--Designing and managing the construction of military
facilities for the Army and Air Force. (Military
Construction)
--Providing design and construction management support for
other Defense and Federal agencies. (Interagency and
International Services)
The Energy and Water bill only funds the Civil Works
missions of the Corps of Engineers. Approximately 23,000
civilians and about 190 military officers are responsible for
this nationwide mission.
From our hundreds of rivers, lakes and wetlands to our
thousands of miles of coastal shoreline, we are fortunate in
America to enjoy an abundance of water resources. As a Nation,
we value these resources for their natural beauty; for the many
ways they help meet human needs; and for the fact that they
provide habitat for thousands of species of plants, fish and
wildlife.
The Congress has given the Corps of Engineers the
responsibility of helping to care for these important aquatic
resources.
Through its Civil Works program the Corps carries out a
wide array of projects that provide:
--Coastal storm damage reduction
--Disaster preparedness and response
--Environmental protection and restoration
--Flood damage reduction
--Hydropower
--Navigable waters
--Recreational opportunities
--Regulatory oversight
--Water supply
One of the biggest challenges the Corps and other
Government agencies face is finding the right balance among the
often conflicting concerns our society has related to our water
resources. Society wants these resources to help fuel economic
growth (navigation, hydropower). Society wants them to provide
social benefits (recreation). And finally society wants to be
sure that they are available for future generations
(environmental protection and restoration).
The Corps is charged with seeking to achieve the best
possible balance among these competing demands through an
integrated approach to water resources management that focuses
on regional solutions, involving an array of stakeholders (that
is other Government agencies, environmental groups, businesses
and private organizations). In recent years, the Corps has
implemented this approach largely by concentrating on
watersheds.
OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2009 BUDGET REQUEST
The fiscal year 2009 budget request for the Corps of
Engineers is composed of $4,741,000,000 in new budget
authority. This is a decrease of $130,000,000 from the fiscal
year 2008 request. The President's overall budget priorities
are stated to be to (1) continue long-term economic growth, (2)
win the global war on terror, and (3) secure the homeland. The
Committee fails to understand how this budget proposal for the
Corps complies with either goal 1 or goal 3. How can one be
taken seriously about providing for long term economic growth
when one is proposing less funding for national infrastructure
that contributes to economic growth than had been proposed in
the previous year. It is certainly not because a large number
of projects were completed in fiscal year 2008 or that a
considerable amount of backlogged maintenance work was done. It
appears to once again be a short-sighted budgetary decision.
The Committee finds it remarkable that the administration can
request and receive billions of dollars for infrastructure
improvements in other countries and yet continues to
shortchange our own. This budget request is more than
$846,000,000 less than the fiscal year 2008 enacted budget for
the Corps. The fiscal year 2008 enacted amount was contained in
a bill the President signed that comported to his top-line
budget numbers. However, once again, it appears that the
baseline for the Corps budget is not the enacted amount but the
amount the President proposes. If the administration would
accept the reality of the Nation's infrastructure needs and
budget accordingly, the gulf between the budget request and the
enacted amount might not be as large. At a time when this
existing infrastructure, the foundation of our economic
security and quality of life, is depreciating much faster than
it is being recapitalized, when our increasing population is
placing much greater stress on the Nation's vital water
resources, when shifts in population centers mean new and
different problems and when a growing environmental awareness
requires new solutions to persistent problems, this
underfunding is unacceptable and threatens our continued well-
being.
The Nation has been struck by a number of natural disasters
over the last several years ranging from hurricanes, tornados,
nor'easters and river flooding. This Committee has appropriated
more than $14,000,000,000 to the Corps of Engineers to cope
with the effects of these disasters on Federal facilities or
facilities that are part of the Federal protection systems.
This is more than six times the annual construction budget of
the Corps. Some of these damages may not have been incurred had
more robust infrastructure budgets been proposed by this and
prior administrations. Yet no lesson seems to be learned from
these disasters. The current flooding in the Midwest is in many
ways a predictable repeat of the 1993 flood. Few of the
recommendations made after that event were implemented. If they
had, much of the damage and suffering currently occurring might
have been avoided. Congress has successfully increased
investments in our Nation's infrastructure over the last 8
years however these increases have most often been accomplished
without the active support of the administration.
The administration budget continues the trend of
underfunding the General Investigations [GI] account thereby
depriving us of the Nation's primary tool to identify future
challenges and develop innovative solutions to water resources
challenges and needs. The fiscal year 2002 GI request was
$130,000,000. This has declined to $91,000,000 in fiscal year
2009. Compare this to the fiscal year 2008 enacted amount of
$167,000,000. This decline is not due to a reduction in water
resources needs, rather, it appears to be a deliberate attempt
to choke off the Corps planning program. Of the $91,000,000
recommended in the budget request less than 50 percent is for
actual studies that might eventually become projects. Nearly
half of these study funds are dedicated to a single study.
Therefore, the rest of the Nation has to share a little over
$21,000,000 for all of the rest of the studies in the Nation.
This budget request greatly inhibits the Corps ability to do
proper planning or to address workforce considerations. Budgets
such as these, if enacted, will erode the Corps technical
competency in the planning area.
Planning in the Corps is a specialized skillset and once
that ability is lost, it is difficult to reestablish. Most of
the criticisms of the Corps project development process in
recent years have centered on the planning process. The
administration is providing funding for some improvements to
the Planning program such as funding the Planning Associates
Program and Planning Centers of Expertise. However, planning
studies have to be undertaken to utilize these improvements.
The Committee believes that the Corps should have a robust
planning program to not only address new water resource needs
but to evaluate changes throughout the project development
process. Continued budgets like this will lead to a complete
loss of this vital Corps of Engineers' competency. The
administration should seriously revise their priorities for
this account in the fiscal year 2010 budget.
The Construction, General [CG] and Operation and
Maintenance [O&M] accounts have to be discussed jointly due to
the way the budget request blurs the line between the
traditional project split between the two accounts.
Priorities for the CG account are based on six criteria for
fiscal year 2009. The primary criterion again is the project's
benefit to cost ratio [BCR]. Projects with high risk to human
safety and a BCR greater than 1.5 or are significant or cost
effective aquatic ecosystem restoration projects are given
funding for current contract needs. No new construction starts
met the administration's new start criteria for fiscal year
2009. Projects complying with treaties and biological opinions
and/or meeting mitigation requirements as well as dam safety,
seepage control and static instability correction were given
the maximum funding for efficient and effective execution.
Once again, the O&M account appears to have been increased
by more than $231,000,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted
amount. However the administration has again proposed shifting
major project rehabilitations and environmental compliance
activities associated with completed projects from CG to O&M.
Also shifted to O&M are dredged material disposal projects,
beach erosion restoration due to completed navigation projects
and initial nourishment of beach projects. This shifting of
projects was allegedly done in the name of budget
transparency--trying to show the true costs of project
operations. This seems to be a very weak justification in that
the Bureau of Reclamation which has similar projects in their
construction accounts still has not received similar guidance
in their budget preparation. By shifting some of these projects
such as major rehabs and beach nourishments to O&M the
administration was able to circumvent their own new start
criteria. Further, by funding environmental compliance
activities in the individual O&M projects seems to make the
budget process less transparent by hiding how much these
activities are costing the Nation by distributing these costs
across multiple projects as opposed to a single line item in
previous budgets. Finally, the administration's budget proposal
limits coastal storm damage reduction projects that require
periodic sand renourishments to those where the erosion is due
to navigation projects. It also proposes to limit Federal
participation to initial beach nourishment.
Shifting of projects from the two accounts totals almost
$265,000,000. This corresponds to a similar decrease in CG
funding for fiscal year 2009. If the projects are shifted back
to their traditional accounts, the O&M budget is
$2,210,225,000. That is over $33,000,000 less than the fiscal
year 2008 enacted amount. Further the administration proposed
spreading the O&M funding over 28 additional individual
projects than what they had proposed in fiscal year 2008. This
is the ultimate example of doing more with less. Prices for
labor, fuel and materials have all increased over the previous
year, not decreased and yet the Corps is expected to do more
with less. The Committee notes that the Corps maintenance
backlog is more than $1,000,000,000 and increases by about
$100,000,000 annually as the inventory of projects ages.
After criticism from this Committee concerning the
presentation of O&M as 21 separate regions based on watersheds,
the administration modified their proposal for fiscal year
2009. The O&M budget is now proposed as 54 separate regions
based on sub watersheds as opposed to discrete projects. The
discrete projects are still listed for each region, it is just
that the administration has not attached any funding levels to
any of the projects so this Committee nor any one else would
know how much funding might be provided for individual
projects. The lack of specificity and detail in a nearly
$2,500,000,000 request is appalling and will be discussed in
more detail later. The Committee continues to believe this so
called ``regional budget' is no more than an aggregation of the
projects within a specific watershed not the development of a
regional budget. The Committee believes that the Corps should
budget regionally and take advantage of whatever efficiencies
can be gained by budgeting in this manner. However, it should
also be noted that projects are individually analyzed and
authorized. Estimates of O&M costs are established as a part of
the project development process. If individual O&M estimates
are not displayed, there is no way to know if the projects are
costing more or less than was anticipated and no way to learn
from past errors in developing O&M costs or procedures.
The regulatory budget is $180,000,000 for fiscal year 2009.
This is the same as in fiscal year 2008.
The Committee is disappointed that funding for the Formerly
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program [FUSRAP] was cut by
$10,000,000 from the fiscal year 2008 amount of $140,000,000.
This program was transferred to the Corps from the Department
of Energy, because the Committee was concerned with management
and cost issues of the program within the Energy Department.
This is a program that is being well managed by the Corps and
should have stable, adequate budget resources to continue these
radiological clean-up activities.
The Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies account is funded
at $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2009. The Committee supports
this funding for disaster readiness and preparedness activities
of the Corps of Engineers.
The budget request separates the budget request for the
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)
from the General Expenses [GE] account. The Committee continues
to believe that the Assistant Secretary's office should be
funded in the Defense Appropriations bill. However, until such
time as that can be reintegrated into that bill, the Committee
is grateful to see that the budget request proposes it as a
separate account. The Assistant Secretary's duties encompass
much more than the civil works functions of the Corps of
Engineers and the budget needs of the office should be
addressed separately.
The Committee is pleased to see an increase in the GE
budget for fiscal year 2009. With the increases in
responsibilities for the headquarters of the Corps in
overseeing larger budgets as well as the massive rebuilding of
the flood and storm damage reduction measures in the New
Orleans area, it is appropriate that this account should be
increased. The Committee notes that the Corps operates one of
the most efficient headquarters staffs in the National Capital
region. Only about 3.5 percent of their staffing is at their
headquarters level as opposed to 10 percent or more for
comparable agencies in the National Capital region.
The administration has proposed legislation and funding to
complete the 100-year protection for the greater New Orleans
Hurricane Protection System as a part of the fiscal year 2009
budget request. The administration has proposed to authorize a
single hurricane protection project to encompass the Lake
Ponchartrain and Vicinity and the West Bank and Vicinity
projects along with the other improvements that were authorized
and funded in Public Law 109-148 and Public Law 109-234. The
Southeast Louisiana projects that provide interior drainage to
this system are also proposed to be included. The Budget
proposes $5,671,000,000 in emergency funding as a part of the
fiscal year 2009 request. The budget proposal also provides
legislation to modify the cost sharing for the remaining
uncompleted cost shared project features to 65 percent Federal
and 35 percent non-Federal. This change results in an increase
to the non-Federal interests of $213,000,000 for a total non-
Federal share that exceeds $1,500,000,000. The administration
says that the Federal funds are needed no later than October 1,
2008 in order to have all of this work completed by the
beginning of hurricane season in June 2011.
The Congress provided these emergency funds in the
Supplemental Appropriations Act, (Public Law 110-252) signed by
the President on June 30, 2008.
PERFORMANCE BASED BUDGETING
The Committee has watched with interest over the last 5
years as the Corps has moved to a ``performance based budget''
model. Unfortunately, the Committee does not see improvement in
the budgeting of the Nation's Civil Works infrastructure
program as a result of this new model. In fact, the Committee
believes quite the opposite is true. Rather than an integrated
program, the budget for the Civil Works program seems to
continue to degenerate toward a yearly collection of
interchangeable projects dependent only on the budgetary whims
and criteria in use in that particular year. The current method
of performance based budgeting utilized in this budget
preparation turns the Nation away from infrastructure
investments that return two and even three times their cost.
In fiscal year 2005, more than 130 projects were budgeted
by the administration for construction; this year there are
only about 82. However, Congress funded more than 300 projects
in fiscal year 2008 and has averaged about 315 annually since
fiscal year 2000. Unfortunately, the budget request pretends
that these on-going projects which have been funded annually
for many years in enacted legislation do not exist. Further the
budget assumes it costs nothing to ignore these projects. If
Congress funded only the budget request for Construction,
General, the administration would quickly discover that
termination costs for unfunded ongoing projects could easily
exceed the request. This is irresponsible budgeting on the part
of the administration.
From the Committee's perspective, the Corps' budget seems
to be developed exactly in the opposite manner that it should
be. It appears that overall spending targets are set by the
administration and then their priority projects are inserted
within these targets. Criteria are then established to justify
funding the lower priority projects within the remaining
funding targets. The problem with budgeting in this manner is
evident in the construction account for fiscal year 2009. Six
priority projects consume 32 percent of the requested dollars
in this account. Another 11 projects related to dam safety
consume another 27 percent. That means that some 65 projects
have to split the remaining 41 percent of the budgeted
construction dollars.
The logic behind this budgeting rational appears to be that
concentrating scarce resources on finishing a few higher
performing projects will allow the Nation to reap the benefits
of these projects sooner. The trouble with this is that these
are long-term projects that take many years to complete. At the
rate the budget is headed, we will only be funding the
administration's six priority projects and the dam safety
repairs in another couple of years with little else in the
pipeline. The Committee questions this rationale when benefits
of flood control projects can be accrued incrementally as
project elements are completed. Even navigation projects can
accrue benefits for a partially completed project. For
instance, the administration claims to be providing completion
funds for the Columbia River Channel Deepening project.
However, the Committee understands that there is a 1 mile
segment where additional work will be required once the
dredging work is completed to provide full project depth and
dimension. The cost of this 1 mile reach has not yet been
determined. However, ports and terminals downstream of this
reach will benefit from the deeper channel and those national
benefits will accrue to the economy. Even the Port of Portland,
which is above this reach, believes that with proper tidal
conditions, they can reap some benefit from the deeper project
until this remaining reach is completed. These are net positive
benefits to the national economy compared to the value of the
benefits that are deferred by suspending or terminating these
other projects in order to concentrate resources on such a few
projects.
In some cases these deferred benefits may never be realized
due to these terminations. Local sponsors who share in these
projects' cost may lose their ability to share these costs or
may lose public support for finishing these projects. Once
these priority projects are completed, one has to wonder
whether there will be any projects or sponsors interested in
resuming construction in an infrastructure program that
suspends projects based on changeable annual criteria.
In the past, Corps budgets were developed from the bottom
up, District to Division to Headquarters to ASA to OMB.
District commanders were responsible for developing and
managing a program within their geographic area. Division
Commanders were responsible for integrating the District office
programs into a single Division-wide program. The Headquarters
office integrated the Division Programs into a single national
program. The OASA assured that the program complied with
administration policy and budgetary guidance and OMB developed
the budgetary guidance and provided funding levels. Decisions
for budgeting were made within the framework of administration
policy by those who knew the projects and programs best, not
Washington level bureaucrats.
Another benefit of budgeting in this manner is that it
allows the Corps to undertake workforce planning to distribute
their work across the Nation. When one chooses to concentrate
nearly 60 percent of the construction budget in a handful of
projects, there is no way the workload can be balanced across
the remainder of the Nation with what is left. Unlike other
Federal agencies that have a salaries and expense component to
their budget, the Corps does not, at least not at the District
office level. Virtually all costs at District offices (rent,
utilities, labor, materials, et cetera) are charged to projects
and studies as directed by Congress. This enables the public to
be informed of the true cost of all projects. Accordingly, it
is necessary that the budget process be consistent with the
accounting practice. When dealing with such large differences
in workload from fiscal year to fiscal year it is clear that
the administration gave little thought to how this budget would
impact the Corps' organizational structure or ability to
maintain a technically competent workforce. Congress has
repeatedly demonstrated that it desires to keep the structure
of the Corps of Engineers as it is currently configured. Yet,
if the budget were enacted, there would be no way to maintain
this workforce, due to how budgetary criteria skewed the
projects to certain areas of the country. Neither a pure
``bottom up'' budget process, nor a performance-based budget
process is perfect. Experienced decision makers are expected to
exercise informed judgment to achieve a balanced program
considering all factors. Once more, the administration appears
to have submitted a very unbalanced program using
oversimplified decision metrics to consider only a few
objectives (for example BCR and efficient completion of a few
projects) that do not take into account the long-term needs of
the Nation or the organization expected to manage the program.
The recently enacted WRDA bill made numerous reforms to
Corps of Engineers procedures. However, one change that
Congress did not include was changing the BCR necessary for a
project to be authorized for construction from the current 1.0
to 1. The budgetary criterion mentioned above requires a BCR to
be 3.0 to 1 for full budgeting or a 1.5 to 1 for partial
budgeting. This performance based budgeting criteria furthers
the divide between what is required for authorization and what
is required to be budgeted.
These criteria used to be one and the same. Many of the
projects in the recently enacted water resources development
act do not meet this criteria, increasing the backlog of
authorized but unconstructed projects. These new projects,
along with the ongoing projects not funded in the budget and
the increasing number of major rehabilitations needed for aging
infrastructure, are affecting and will continue to affect the
national economy. Existing water resources infrastructure is
wearing out. The Nation needs to recapitalize if we are to
remain competitive in a global marketplace. Infrastructure
budgets, starting from the administration level, have got to be
increased. If not, the Nation will continue to face unscheduled
outages, damaged incomplete infrastructure and other emergency
situations that must be dealt with through ever increasing
emergency appropriations.
FISCAL YEAR 2009 BUDGET INITIATIVES
The administration has proposed the same changes to how the
civil works program is appropriated for fiscal year 2009 that
have been proposed in fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year 2007.
These include the regionalization of operations and maintenance
funding and migrating four categories of projects from the
Construction, General account to the Operations and Maintenance
account. The Committee has rejected all of these initiatives.
Regionalized operations and maintenance funding segregates
funding for projects into 54 watershed regions around the
country as opposed to displaying operations and maintenance
costs by project as has been the tradition. As projects, not
regions, are authorized and funded by Congress, the Committee
must reject this proposal. Operation and Maintenance budgets
are developed on a project by project basis. For large river
basins such as the Ohio or the Missouri, budgeting for the
individual projects, as authorized, involve multiple Districts
and Divisions. As the proposals in the budget are not developed
as a systemized budget, aggregating them in the fashion
proposed does not lead to the ``true costs'' of operating the
system, it just adds up the various parts. The Committee does
not believe that this proposal advances the budgeting for
operations and maintenance.
The Committee is not opposed to a systemized budget for
projects. In fact, in the fiscal year 2008 Energy and Water
joint explanatory statement the Congress directed the Corps to
prepare systemized, integrated budgets for four regions of the
country to demonstrate the value of this approach to the
Committee. The budget request did not include these regional
budgets. Until the value of a regional budget is demonstrated
to the Committee, regional budgeting will not be considered.
The Committee rejects the initiative to move Endangered
Species Act [ESA] compliance activities from Construction,
General to Operations and Maintenance. The stated reason for
this change was budget transparency or to more appropriately
show the true costs of operating these projects. The Committee
has two issues with this logic. Budget transparency fades when
the costs are rolled into the regionalized budgets. However,
even if they were budgeted on a project by project basis, the
casual observer would have no notion of how much of the
operational costs of these projects is related to ESA
compliance. Second, these are only being considered as
operational costs because mitigation for these projects was not
undertaken when the projects were constructed as is now
required by subsequent laws. Were these projects constructed
today, formulation of the projects would have required
avoidance and minimization measures for the endangered species
as project construction costs.
If one wanted to take this argument to the extreme, all of
the Everglades Restoration should be budgeted under the Central
and South Florida O&M project since construction of this
project resulted in the environmental restorations that are now
being implemented. However, the costs for this work would not
be transparent in the budget. By retaining the ESA compliance
measures as separate line items in the CG account, it is much
more transparent as to how much is being funded for these
activities.
The budget has proposed moving major rehabilitation for
locks and dams from the Construction, General account to the
Operations and Maintenance account. Corresponding to this is a
legislative proposal to allow the proceeds from the Inland
Waterway Trust Fund to be utilized in the Operations and
Maintenance account. Current law only allows these funds to be
utilized in the Construction, General account. The Congress
moved major rehabilitation from the Construction, General
account to the Operation and Maintenance account in fiscal year
1985. Subsequently as the backlog increased, it was returned to
the Construction, General account in the fiscal year 1993
budget. The stipulations involved in moving it back to the
Construction account included that these major rehabilitations
would involve more than a simple restoration of project
function. Operational improvements were considered as a part of
the rehab. As such, the rehabilitated, or recapitalized,
projects were considered new investment opportunities for the
country, the same as other new projects, and had to compete as
new starts in the Construction, General program. This is
entirely appropriate as these recapitalized projects provide
increased levels of service and performance not envisioned in
their original construction. If they didn't, under existing
administration policy, the repairs would be considered major
maintenance and would be funded under the Operation and
Maintenance account. To help fund these major rehabs,
legislation allowed half the costs of the major rehab to be
borne by the Inland Waterway Trust Fund with the other half to
come from the General Treasury. The Committee does not believe
moving these projects back to the Operations and Maintenance
account will solve the backlog of major rehabs and rejects this
proposal. The Committee believes that the real intent of this
proposal is to skirt the new start issue in the CG account. The
Corps has proposed initiating a major rehab report for the
Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. By including this in O&M they
don't have to consider this as a new start under their own
budgeting criterion.
The Committee is disappointed that the administration has
recycled their beach policy from the fiscal year 2008 budget.
This proposal was rejected by the Congress. The authorizing
committees that prepared the recently enacted Water Resources
Development Act chose to reject this policy as well. The
Committee rejects the policy again this year. The Committee
notes that beaches are the leading tourist destination in the
United States and that about 50 percent of our population lives
near our Nation's coasts. Typically shore protection projects
are justified on storm damages prevented alone, and the
recreation benefits only enhance the benefit to cost ratio.
Shore protection projects should be viewed in the same manner
as levees along our rivers. These projects mitigate storm
damage in the same fashion that levees mitigate riverine
flooding.
The maximum Federal Government contribution to Federal
shore protection projects is 65 percent of the total project
cost but the Government receives all the benefits in reducing
Federal disaster assistance payments. Like much of our other
infrastructure, by paying for Federal shore protection projects
now, we can avoid many of the catastrophic losses and disaster
assistance payments associated with hurricanes and coastal
storms. Simply stated, the Nation can pay now to avoid losses
or pay more later to recover from severe impacts. It truly
makes sense to be proactive and not reactive in this
environment.
The Committee believes that this budget proposal is no way
to run a robust national infrastructure program. The Committee
recommended that the Corps include additional criteria into the
project prioritization process and commends the administration
for having done so for the fiscal year 2009 budget request.
However, the net result is that the mix of projects is
substantially unchanged. The Committee does not believe that
this prioritization method can be salvaged into a useable
system. Further, the Committee has seen no evidence that it has
improved the budget process.
Rather than trying new budget models and new prioritization
criteria, the country needs to invest more heavily in its water
resources. Water resource projects are some of the only Federal
expenditures that go through a rigorous benefit to cost process
to determine benefits to the national economy. The standard of
living that we currently enjoy is due to the excess capacity
that was built into our water resources infrastructure by
previous generations. By failing to make new investments and
recapitalizing aging infrastructure, the Nation is not only
falling behind our competition around the world, but is
jeopardizing our future economic growth.
BUDGET JUSTIFICATIONS
The Committee commends the Corps for the layout of the
budget justifications for fiscal year 2009. Grouping projects
by the Division office rather than according to business lines
makes the justifications much more useful to the Committee and
provides more easily accessible information to the public. The
Committee expects that this method of displaying the budget
justifications will be continued for the fiscal year 2010
budget.
The Committee finds the justifications for O&M projects to
be totally inadequate. Inadequate is an understatement, there
were no justifications provided for O&M. The only information
provided was the business line totals for each region. How the
information was established to justify these totals is a
mystery in the justification statements. When the Committee
staff initially inquired about information for the individual
projects that made up the funded regions, they were told that
OMB had directed that information concerning individual
projects was not to be released. Fortunately OMB relented on
this point and allowed the Corps to provide this information.
For a $2,500,000,000 account this is an unacceptable manner to
justify a budget. More information was provided for the
$40,000,000 in studies in the GI account than was provided for
all of O&M.
The Committee is also disappointed in the justifications
for the Continuing Authorities Program and the Dam Safety/
Seepage Stability Correction Program. The justifications for
these items showed a total dollar value and listed projects,
but give the Committee no idea how the program totals were
arrived at. There is no way to know whether the administration
proposal underfunds or overfunds these programs.
The Committee believes that budget justifications serve to
justify the administration's request. The budget justifications
could be improved by providing more relevant budget and project
information. For fiscal year 2010 the Corps is directed to
provide, at a minimum, detailed project information for each
O&M project justifying the needs for each project. If the
administration chooses to continue to provide the business line
information, it may be provided as a separate appendix to the
justifications.
INLAND WATERWAY TRUST FUND
When the fiscal year 2008 budget was presented to Congress,
the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) notified the
committee of a looming deficit in the Inland Waterway Trust
Fund [IWTF] due to the amount of work that was being funded on
the inland waterway system. He stated that legislation would be
forthcoming from the administration to address this expected
shortfall. The Congress never received a proposal in calendar
year 2007. Even though the Environment and Public Works
Committee was working on a WRDA bill, and the WRDA could have
been the appropriate vehicle for the legislation, no
legislation was forthcoming.
When the fiscal year 2009 budget was presented to Congress,
the budget announced a proposal to phase out the existing fuel
tax that funds the IWTF and phase in a lockage fee. It also
announced that a legislative proposal would be forthcoming. The
legislative proposal was finally submitted to Congress on April
4, 2008. Six months before the beginning of the new fiscal
year. The administration's budget for fiscal year 2009 was
predicated on this significant change in law being enacted by
October 1, 2008. More funding was proposed to be utilized from
the IWTF than was estimated to be available utilizing the
current revenue source. The only way to fund the
administration's budget request for IWTF projects, as they had
been cost shared, was through a change in law.
The Committee has supported and continues to support
sharing the cost of construction and major rehabilitations
between the IWTF and the General Treasury in the Construction,
General account. The Committee believes that this arrangement
makes the users active partners in the overall inland waterway
system and provides for a better more efficient system. As the
Congress already pays 100 percent of the O&M costs of the
inland waterway system, the Committee would not support a
change in cost sharing for the IWTF. Even if it did support a
cost share change, this would only prolong the inevitable
bankrupting of the IWTF.
The current fuel tax generates about $90,000,000 annually.
Currently awarded continuing contracts for IWTF projects will
require approximately $60,000,000 of this amount for the next 4
years. The administration has proposed and the Committee has
been appropriating considerably more than that amount from the
fund over the last several years. Therefore, the Committee
believes that the only way to solve the problem is to generate
additional revenues in the fund. The current fuel tax is spread
relatively equitably across all commercial users of the inland
waterway system. However, the fuel tax has remained at $0.20
per gallon of diesel fuel since 1996. Inflation and increased
efficiency in tow boats has eroded the value of the fuel tax.
One potential solution is to index the fuel tax to inflation.
Another solution would be to keep the current fuel tax in place
but to add a lock user fee to the revenue stream. This way, all
users would pay something and those that use the locks would
pay more. A wholesale change from a fuel tax to a user fee as
proposed by the administration appears to be unacceptable to
Congress or the inland waterway industry. However, the
Committee only proffers these as discussion topics. The one
problem the Committee sees with a user fee is that it could
deter use of waterways. As waterways are the most efficient
mode of transport any solution to the funding shortfall should
not provide disincentives for using the inland waterways.
To fund the administration request for fiscal year 2009
would require approximately $117,000,000 in IWTF revenues. The
Corps has informed the Committee that there will not be that
much available in fiscal year 2009. The Corps has also informed
the Committee that in order to keep from exceeding available
revenues that they have not awarded a planned contract in
fiscal year 2008 that would have requirements in fiscal year
2009 for the Lock and Dams 2, 3, and 4 on the Monongahela
River. To address the funding shortfall in the IWTF the
Committee is taking the unusual step of directing in
legislative text that only nine inland waterway projects will
have access to IWTF revenues in fiscal year 2009 in order to
assure that planned work does not exceed revenues. The Corps is
directed in fiscal year 2009 to utilize the general fund of the
U.S. Treasury to fund inland waterway projects without specific
statutory requirements to be funded from the IWTF. The
Committee intends this to be a single year change. Fiscal year
2009 inland waterway projects funded entirely with General Fund
revenues should be brought to a logical stopping point and
deferred until such time as the IWTF revenue stream is enhanced
and these projects can again be cost shared with the IWTF.
Legislative text is also being included to prohibit the
Corps from entering into any new continuing contracts for any
inland waterway project until the revenue stream for the IWTF
is enhanced. The administration should submit the fiscal year
2010 budget based on expected revenues in the IWTF not based on
projections based on legislation that may or may not happen. If
the budget is submitted utilizing the same assumptions on the
IWTF that the administration made this year, the Committee will
have no choice but to curtail spending on all inland waterway
projects in fiscal year 2010 to a level that fits within the
IWTF estimated revenues.
No change in law has been made nor will this Committee
propose any to alleviate the funding problem that will occur in
fiscal year 2009. That means the Committee cannot fund the
administration's request as proposed.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING
The budget for the Corps of Engineers consists of
individual line items of projects. As presented by the
President, the budget contains 151 specific line item requests
for funding. As was previously discussed the O&M request
proposed expending funds in an additional 54 line items listed
as watershed basins or subbasins. However, once the detail was
received from the administration concerning O&M, the O&M
funding was spread across 820 specific line items. This totals
971 specific line item requests for directed spending by the
administration. Additional funding is requested by the
administration for nationwide line items. The administration
does not consider anything that the administration requests as
an earmark. Yet all of these line items were specific requests
by the administration of the Congress to be funded in fiscal
year 2009. They did not request these funds programmatically,
they requested them for a specific project in a specific
location for a specific purpose.
The President published an Executive Order [EO] on January
29, 2008, that directs his agency heads to ignore
congressionally directed spending items that are contained in
the explanatory reports that accompany legislative text and
states that an ``earmark'' is any funding requested by Congress
that circumvents a merit based or competitive allocation
process. The EO does not define what a merit based or
competitive allocation process is, but one can assume that it
will be how the administration chooses to define it and
projects added by Congress will not be considered.
The Committee has traditionally included funding for the
Corps of Engineers by account in legislative text and provided
the details for each account within the report that accompanies
the legislation. This was primarily done to provide the agency
some flexibility in how funds were expended and to allow the
Corps to effectively manage their program while honoring the
intent of Congress. The primary intent of Congress has always
been that once the Congress funded a study, it intended for the
study phase to be completed to determine if Federal investment
is warranted. By the same token, once the Congress committed to
initiation of construction of a project, it intended for the
project to be completed and the national economy to accrue the
project benefits. With this Executive Order in place, the
Committee is concerned that this intent might not be followed.
There appears to be little desire for discussion of what
exactly is meant in this Executive Order, so the Committee has
executed its constitutional prerogatives by including statutory
language to incorporate by reference all of the details of each
account from the report that accompanies the legislative text,
into the actual legislative text. This will ensure that the
intent of Congress is fully complied with.
CONTINUING CONTRACTS AND REPROGRAMMING
The Committee expects the Chief of Engineers to execute the
Civil Works program generally in accordance with congressional
direction. This includes moving individual projects forward in
accordance with the funds annually appropriated. However, the
Committee realizes that many factors outside the Corps' control
may dictate the progress of any given project or study. Because
the individual projects are being incorporated into the
legislative text the Corps is cautioned that while the
Committee is firmly in favor of utilizing continuing contracts
for the Civil Works program, it may be difficult to award this
type of contract under these constraints.
Because of the Committee's concern that congressional
intent be followed, reprogramming authority has been withdrawn
from all but the O&M account and the O&M portion of the
Mississippi River and Tributaries project.
Reprogramming authority is as follows:
Operations and Maintenance.--Unlimited reprogramming
authority is granted in order for the Corps to be able to
respond to emergency situations. The Chief of Engineers must
notify the House and Senate Appropriations Committees of these
emergency actions as soon thereafter as practicable. For all
other situations, for a base less than $1,000,000, the
reprogramming limit is $150,000. For a base over $1,000,000, 15
percent up to a limit of $5,000,000 per project or activity.
Amounts over this limit require approval of the House and
Senate Appropriations Committees. The Committee does not object
reprogramming up to $150,000 to any continuing project or
program that did not receive an appropriation in the current
year.
Mississippi River and Tributaries.--The Corps should follow
the same reprogramming guidelines for the Operation and
Maintenance portions of the Mississippi River and Tributaries
account as listed above.
5-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE BUDGET PLANNING
While the Committee appreciates the Corps' attempts to
provide a meaningful 5-year budget plan, it recognizes the
inherent difficulties between the legislative and executive
branches in preparing a useful plan. The executive branch is
unwilling to project a 5-year horizon for projects for which
they do not budget leaving a sizeable percentage of the Corps
annual appropriations with a year to year event horizon for
planning purposes. The fact that a sizeable portion of the
annual appropriations are dedicated to congressional priorities
is not a new phenomenon. Many major public works projects over
the last two centuries have been funded on an annual basis
without a clear budget strategy. The Committee would welcome
the ideas and the opportunity to work with the executive branch
to determine a mutually agreeable way to develop an integrated
5-year comprehensive budget that displays true funding needs
for congressional as well as administration priorities.
Anything less will only give a partial view of the investments
needed in water resources infrastructure.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommendation includes a total of
$5,300,000,000. This is $559,000,000 over the administration's
budget request and $287,087,000 less than the fiscal year 2008
enacted amount. This table excludes the request for emergency
appropriations for the New Orleans hurricane protection system
as requested in the budget since it has been funded through an
emergency supplemental appropriations act. Funding is displayed
in the following tables in the accounts where projects have
been traditionally located and comparisons to the budget
request are made as if the request was presented in the
traditional manner. Funding by account is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 2009 Commettee Request vs.
request recommendation recommendation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Investigations.................................... $91,000 $166,000 +$75,000
Construction, General..................................... 1,666,775 2,004,500 +337,225
Mississippi River and Tributaries......................... 240,000 365,000 +125,000
Operation and Maintenance................................. 2,210,225 2,220,000 +9,775
Regulatory................................................ 180,000 183,000 +3,000
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies..................... 40,000 40,000 ................
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program........... 130,000 140,000 +10,000
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the.................. ................ ................ ................
Army (Civil Works)........................................ 6,000 4,500 -1,500
General Expenses.......................................... 177,000 177,000 ................
-----------------------------------------------------
Total............................................... 4,741,000 5,300,000 +559,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW STARTS
The passage of the WRDA bill in 2007 presented the
Committee with the challenge of 7 years of pent up demand for
new studies and projects. The Committee had to balance the
funding needs of ongoing work with the future ability to fund
potential new start studies and projects. Ultimately the
Committee decided to fund a very limited number of new studies
and projects. The Committee's essential criterion for deciding
new starts was to ensure that the projects or studies were only
for traditional Corps missions. Therefore the Committee
excluded from consideration:
(1) New environmental infrastructure authorizations;
(2) Non traditional project authorizations;
(3) Authorizations that have not been through the
traditional two phase planning process;
(4) New projects under section 206 and section 1135 of the
Continuing Authorities Program as these program sections are
oversubscribed;
(5) Projects that included demonstration features;
(6) New projects that would require funds from the Inland
Waterway Trust Fund because of lack of funding in the IWTF.
DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS
The Committee received more than 3,000 requests for
projects, programs, studies or activities for the Corps of
Engineers for fiscal year 2009. These requests included the
budget request as well as requests by Members. The Committee
obviously was unable to accommodate all of these requests.
In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding
provided in the Energy and Water bill, all disclosures are made
in the report accompanying the bill.
All of the projects funded in this report have gone through
the same rigorous public review and approval process as those
proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these
projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed
projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary
prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to
decide what not to fund.
For those programs, projects, or studies that were included
in the budgetary documents provided in the budget request, the
words ``The President'' has been added to denote this
administration request. The level of funding provided for each
of these programs, projects or studies should not be construed
as what was requested. Rather, the only intent is to disclose
the requestor.
It should be noted that many line items only have the
President listed as the requestor. It should not be inferred
that the affected Members are not interested in these projects
studies or activities. Rather this is due to Committee
direction that it is unnecessary to request the President's
budget as the individual administration requests are the basis
of the Senate bill.
The purposes for the funding provided in the various
accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each
account. The location of the programs, projects or studies are
denoted in the account tables.
GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $167,261,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 91,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 166,000,000
This appropriation funds studies to determine the need,
engineering feasibility, economic justification, and the
environmental and social suitability of solutions to water and
related land resource problems; and for preconstruction
engineering and design work, data collection, and interagency
coordination and research activities.
The planning program is the entry point for Federal
involvement in solutions to the Nation's water resource
problems and needs. Unfortunately, the General Investigations
[GI] account is eviscerated in the budget request. Nationwide
studies and programs consume over half of the administration's
GI request. This budget is saying that the Nation should
concentrate scarce resources on completing studies but not
carrying forward ongoing studies or allowing new starts. The
Committee continues to believe this argument is remarkably
shortsighted. It assumes that the country will stop growing and
that new investment opportunities will not be present.
In truth, as the country grows, new investment
opportunities will be presented and some previously authorized
projects may no longer make sense or may be less competitive.
The Corps should keep presenting the administration and
Congress with new investment opportunities in order for the
Nation to remain competitive in a global economy. The only
conclusion one can draw from the administration's GI proposal
is that they are determined to redirect the Corps toward
construction, operation and maintenance by strangling their
ability to evaluate water resource problems and needs.
The Committee has provided for a robust and balanced
planning program for fiscal year 2009. The Committee has used
the traditional view within the Corps planning program that
only considers new starts as those that have never received GI
funds before. The Committee believes that to maintain a robust
planning program, a mix of new reconnaissance studies must be
included with the existing feasibility and PED studies. As such
the Committee has included a few new reconnaissance studies in
this account. To provide additional transparency in the budget
process, the Committee has segregated the budget into three
columns in the following table.
The first column represents the reconnaissance phase of the
planning process. These studies determine if there is a Federal
interest in a water resource problem or need and if there is a
cost sharing sponsor willing to move forward with the study.
The next column represents the feasibility phase of the study.
These detailed cost shared studies determine the selected
alternative to be recommended to the Congress for construction.
The third column represents the Preconstruction engineering and
design phase. These detailed cost shared designs are prepared
while the project recommended to Congress is awaiting
authorization for construction.
The Committee believes that by segregating the table in
this manner that more attention will be focused on the various
study phases, and a more balanced planning program will be
developed by the administration. As the last two columns are
generally cost shared, they demonstrate the commitment by cost
sharing sponsors to be a part of the Federal planning process.
By the same token, it also shows the level of commitment of the
Federal Government to these cost sharing sponsors. The
Committee directs that the fiscal year 2010 planning budget be
presented to the Committee in this fashion.
The budget request and the recommended Committee allowance
are shown on the following table:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget estimate Committee recommendation
Project title ------------------------------------------------------------
Investigations Planning RECON FEAS PED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE HARBOR DEEPENING, AK..................... 100 ......... ......... 100 400
BARROW COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION, AK.......... 400 ......... ......... 400 .........
HOMER HARBOR MODIFICATION, AK...................... .............. ......... ......... 400 .........
KENAI RIVER BLUFF EROSION, AK...................... .............. ......... ......... 500 .........
MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK...................... .............. ......... ......... 400 .........
VALDEZ HARBOR EXPANSION, AK........................ .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK................................. 700 ......... ......... 700 .........
ARIZONA
AGUA FRIA RIVER TRILBY WASH, AZ.................... .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
LITTLE COLORADO RIVER WATERSHED, AZ................ .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
PIMA COUNTY, AZ.................................... 275 ......... ......... 275 .........
VA SHLY-AY AKIMEL SALT RIVER RESTORATION, AZ....... .............. 658 ......... .......... 658
ARKANSAS
LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE STUDY, AR......... .............. ......... 254 .......... .........
MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR......................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 250
PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR............................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 500
SOUTHWEST, ARKANSAS, AR............................ .............. ......... ......... 327 .........
WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO........... .............. ......... ......... 500 .........
WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR........... .............. ......... ......... .......... 325
CALIFORNIA
BOLINAS LAGOON ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA........... .............. ......... ......... 350 .........
CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA........ 900 ......... ......... 900 .........
CARPINTERIA SHORELINE STUDY........................ .............. ......... ......... 443 .........
COYOTE & BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA...................... .............. 950 ......... .......... 950
COYOTE DAM, CA..................................... .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
GOLETA BEACH, CA................................... .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
HAMILTON CITY, CA.................................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 500
HEACOCK AND CACTUS CHANNELS, CA.................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500
HUMBOLDT BAY LONG TERM SHOAL MGMT, CA.............. .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
VICINITY..........................................
LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA........ .............. ......... ......... 590 .........
LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA............................ .............. ......... ......... 400 .........
MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA......................... .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
MATILIJA DAM, CA................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 1,000
MIDDLE CREEK, CA................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500
PAJARO RIVER, CA................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 1,000
REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA............................ .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAMP, CA.......................... .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
ROCK CREEK, KEEFER SLOUGH, CA...................... .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN COMP, CA.................... .............. ......... ......... 1,000 .........
SAC--SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA...... 468 ......... ......... 2,000 .........
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SAMP, CA.......................... .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA..................... .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), FRAZIER CREEK/ .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
STRATHMO..........................................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS, ORESTIMBA .............. ......... ......... 400 .........
CR................................................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JAOQUIN RIVER, .............. ......... ......... 600 .........
CA................................................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), WHITE RIVER/DRY .............. ......... ......... 125 .........
CREEK.............................................
SAN PABLO BAY WATERSHED, CA........................ .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA..................... 171 ......... ......... 171 .........
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA.................. .............. ......... ......... 1,400 .........
SUTTER COUNTY, CA.................................. 339 ......... ......... 339 .........
TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING, CA AND NV................. .............. ......... ......... 125 .........
UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA......................... 191 ......... ......... 191 .........
COLORADO
BASALT, CO......................................... .............. ......... 50 .......... .........
CACHE LA POUDRE, CO................................ .............. ......... ......... 5 125
CHATFIELD, CHERRY AND BEAR CREEK, RESERVOIRS, CO... .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, CO............................ .............. ......... 2 250 .........
CONNECTICUT
CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT, MA, NH .............. ......... ......... 450 .........
& VT..............................................
DELAWARE
RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE...... .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
FLORIDA
FLAGER COUNTY, FL.................................. .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
LAKE WORTH INLET, FL............................... .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
MILE POINT, FL..................................... 50 ......... ......... 50 .........
PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL......................... 550 ......... ......... 550 .........
SARASOTA, LIDO KEY, FL............................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 158
ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL............................... .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
WALTON COUNTY, FL.................................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 591
GEORGIA
AUGUSTA, GA........................................ .............. 278 ......... .......... 278
LONG ISLAND, MARSH AND JOHNS CREEKS, GA............ 150 ......... ......... 150 .........
SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA...................... .............. 700 ......... .......... 700
TYBEE ISLAND, GA................................... 250 ......... ......... 250 .........
GUAM
HAGATNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GUAM.................. 350 ......... ......... 350 .........
HAWAII
ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI............................ 300 ......... ......... 300 .........
HILO HARBOR MODIFICATIONS, HI...................... .............. ......... 100 .......... .........
HYDROELECTRIC POWER ASSESSMENT, HI................. .............. ......... 300 .......... .........
KAHUKU, HI......................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 344
KALAELOA BARBERS POINT HARBOR MODIFICATION, HI..... .............. ......... ......... 350 .........
MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HI........................... .............. 200 ......... 200 .........
WAILUPE STREAM, OAHU, HI........................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 300
ILLINOIS
DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II)................... 500 ......... ......... 500 .........
ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL............... 400 ......... ......... 400 .........
INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES--MISSISSIPPI .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
RIVER AQ NUISANCE SPECIES, IL, IN, OH, WI.........
KEITH CREEK, ROCKFORD, IL.......................... .............. ......... ......... 548 .........
PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, IL.................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 50
PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE, IL........................... .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
S. FORK, SOUTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, (BUBBLY .............. ......... ......... 400 .........
CREEK)............................................
UPPER MISS--ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO & .............. ......... ......... 10,000 .........
WI................................................
UPPER MISS RVR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IL, IA, MO, MN & .............. ......... 220 .......... .........
WI................................................
INDIANA
INDIANA HARBOR, IN................................. 300 ......... ......... 300 .........
IOWA
CEDAR RIVER TIME CHECK AREA, IA.................... .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
HUMBOLT, IA........................................ .............. ......... 2 150 .........
KANSAS
MANHATTAN, KS...................................... .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
TOPEKA, KS......................................... .............. 100 ......... .......... 100
UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS............................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 150
LOUISIANA
AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
LA................................................
BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA.............................. .............. 1,599 ......... .......... 1,599
BOSSIER PARISH, LA................................. .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
CALCASIEU LOCK, LA................................. 53 ......... ......... 600 .........
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA....................... .............. ......... ......... 162 .........
CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA.......................... 67 ......... ......... 67 .........
CROSS LAKE, LA..................................... .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM REST, LA (SCIENCE 10,000 ......... ......... .......... .........
PRO...............................................
LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA... 10,000 ......... ......... 10,000 .........
PORT OF IBERIA, LA................................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 1,000
ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA......... 500 ......... ......... 500 .........
ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA....... .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE PROTECTION, .............. ......... ......... 1,500 .........
LA................................................
WEST SHORE, LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA................. .............. ......... ......... 900 .........
MAINE
SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME............................... .............. ......... ......... 157 .........
MARYLAND
ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMP PLAN, MD...... .............. ......... ......... 400 .........
BALTIMORE METRO WATER RESOURCES--PATAPSCO URBAN .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
RIVER.............................................
CHESAPEAKE BAY MARSHLANDS, MD...................... .............. ......... ......... 1,000 .........
CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND COASTAL .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
MANAGEMENT........................................
CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT .............. ......... 100 100 .........
MANAGEMENT........................................
EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD....... .............. ......... ......... .......... 983
LOWER POTOMAC ESTUARY WATERSHED, ST. MARY'S, MD.... .............. ......... ......... .......... 150
MIDDLE POTOMAC COMP PLAN, MD, VA, PA, WV, DC....... .............. ......... ......... 175 .........
MIDDLE POTOMAC WATERSHED, GREAT SENECA CREEK, AND .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
MUDDY.............................................
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT AND .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
ENVIRO............................................
MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA................ .............. 2,300 ......... .......... 2,300
PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA............. 96 ......... ......... 96 .........
MICHIGAN
GREAT LAKES NAV SYST STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, 200 ......... 200 .......... .........
PA...............................................
GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS (RAP), MI........ .............. ......... ......... 1,000 .........
LANSING, GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, MI.... .............. ......... 50 .......... .........
ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI................................ .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
MINNESOTA
MARSH LAKE, MN (MN RIVER AUTHORITY)................ .............. ......... ......... 227 .........
MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED, MN...................... .............. ......... ......... 350 .........
MINNESOTA RIVER BASIN, MN & SD..................... .............. ......... ......... 350 .........
WILD RICE RIVER, RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN.. 271 ......... ......... 271 .........
MISSISSIPPI
PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS.......................... .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
MISSOURI
BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO......................... .............. ......... ......... 274 .........
KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS.............................. 262 ......... ......... 315 .........
MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO..................... 88 ......... ......... 588 .........
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L45 & R460-471, .............. ......... ......... .......... 300
MO................................................
RIVER DES PERES, MO................................ .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
SWOPE PARK, KANSAS CITY, MO........................ .............. 138 ......... .......... .........
MONTANA
YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT..................... 200 ......... ......... 500 .........
NEBRASKA
LOWER PLATTE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NE............. .............. ......... ......... 177 .........
NEW HAMPSHIRE
MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA........... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, HN & ME... .............. ......... ......... 82 .........
NEW JERSEY
DELAWARE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE, NJ................... 290 ......... ......... 290 .........
HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ 204 ......... ......... 204 .........
HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, NJ... 200 ......... ......... 500 .........
LOWER SADDLE RIVER, BERGEN COUNTY, NJ.............. .............. ......... ......... .......... 375
NEW JERSEY SHORE PROTECTION, HEREFORD TO CAPE MAY .............. ......... ......... 4 150
INLET.............................................
NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
NOURISHMENT.......................................
PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ........................ .............. ......... ......... .......... 250
PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ........................ .............. ......... ......... .......... 297
PECKMAN RIVER BASIN, NJ............................ .............. ......... ......... 375 .........
RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ............................. .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ...... .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ....... .............. ......... ......... .......... 100
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION BEACH, NJ.... .............. ......... ......... .......... 100
SHREWSBURY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 250
SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ............... .............. ......... ......... .......... 375
STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ............. .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
NEW MEXICO
ESPANOLA VALLEY RIO GRANDE AND TRIBS, NM........... .............. ......... ......... 400 .........
RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO & TX...................... .............. ......... ......... 500 .........
SANTA FE, NM....................................... .............. ......... ......... 28 .........
NEW YORK
BUFFALO RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, NY........... 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
FORGE RIVER WATERSHED, LONG ISLAND, NY............. .............. ......... ......... 125 .........
HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NY..................... .............. ......... ......... 125 .........
HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ................... 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY............................ .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
MONTAUK POINT, NY.................................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 375
NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, ASHAROKEN, NY.......... .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
NORTH SHORE LONG ISLAND, BAYVILLE, NY.............. .............. ......... ......... 175 .........
SAW MILL RIVER WATERSHED, NY....................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 250
SOUTH SHORE OF STATEN ISLAND, NY................... .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
TEN MILE RIVER WATERSHED, DUTCHESS CTY, NY & .............. ......... ......... 125 .........
LITCHFIEL.........................................
WESTCHESTER COUNTY STREAMS, NY..................... .............. ......... ......... 175 .........
UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NY................. .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
NEVADA
TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV................................ .............. ......... ......... .......... 5,000
NORTH CAROLINA
BOGUE BANKS, NC.................................... .............. ......... ......... 132 .........
CURRITUCK SOUND, NC................................ 150 ......... ......... 150 .........
NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC.............................. .............. 200 ......... .......... 200
NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL PORT, NC.............. .............. ......... 100 .......... .........
SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC.............. .............. ......... ......... 386 .........
NORTH DAKOTA
MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, MO......... .............. ......... ......... 3,000 .........
RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD & .............. ......... ......... 500 .........
MANITOBA, CANADA..................................
OHIO
BELPRE, OH......................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 150
CUYAHOGA RIVER BULKHEAD STUDY, OH.................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 126
HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OH.............. .............. ......... ......... .......... 300
MAHONING RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OH.......... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500
WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, BLANCHARD RIVER WATERSHED, .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
OH................................................
WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI.............. .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
OKLAHOMA
GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, MO, KS & .............. ......... ......... 60 .........
AR................................................
GRAND LAKE COMPREHENSIVE, OK....................... .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK........ .............. ......... ......... 500 .........
WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK............................ .............. ......... ......... 250 .........
OREGON
AMAZON CREEK, OR................................... .............. ......... ......... 350 .........
WALLA WALLA RIVER WATERSHED, OR & WA............... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500
WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR........ 240 ......... ......... 240 .........
PENNSYLVANIA
BLOOMSBURG, PA..................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 700
DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, PA, .............. ......... 125 .......... .........
DE, &.............................................
UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION STUDY, PA.................... .............. ......... ......... 4,200 .........
SOUTH CAROLINA
EDISTO ISLAND, SC.................................. 218 ......... ......... 218 .........
SOUTH DAKOTA
JAMES RIVER, SD & ND............................... .............. ......... ......... 350 .........
WATERTOWN AND VICINITY, SD......................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 450
TENNESSE
MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN.......... 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
TEXAS
ABILENE, TX........................................ .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX...... 400 ......... ......... 400 .........
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX.................... .............. 150 ......... .......... .........
DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX..... .............. 207 ......... .......... 1,000
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX................................ 400 ......... ......... 400 .........
GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENTS, TX 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER, TX.............. .............. 150 ......... .......... 150
GIWW, PORT OCONNOR TO CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TX....... 350 ......... ......... 350 .........
GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX......... 223 ......... ......... 223 .........
LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX..................... 425 ......... ......... 425 .........
NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX................... 250 ......... ......... 650 .........
RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX............................. .............. ......... ......... .......... 350
RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX............................... 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX......................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500
SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX................... .............. ......... ......... 400 .........
SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX.......... .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
VERMONT
MONTPELIER, VT.................................... .............. ......... ......... 750 .........
VIRGINIA
AIWW BRIDGE AT DEEP CREEK, VA...................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 500
CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA......................... .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
DISMAL SWAMP AND DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA............ .............. ......... ......... 262 .........
ELIZABETH RIVER, HAMPTON ROADS, VA................. .............. 97 ......... .......... 97
FOUR MILE RUN, VA.................................. .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (SECTION 300 ......... ......... 300 .........
216)..............................................
LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VA.......................... 175 ......... ......... 175 .........
NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA........................ .............. ......... ......... .......... 150
UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA (PHASE II)............ .............. ......... ......... 200 .........
VICINITY AND WILLOUGHBY SPIT, VA................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 200
WASHINGTON
CENTRALIA, WA...................................... .............. ......... ......... .......... 1,200
CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA........................... .............. ......... ......... 1,000 .........
ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL, WA............................ .............. ......... ......... 750 .........
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA & OR 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, 400 ......... ......... 1,500 .........
WA................................................
PUYALLUP RIVER, WA................................. .............. ......... 57 .......... .........
SKAGIT RIVER, WA................................... .............. ......... ......... 505 .........
SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA.......................... .............. ......... ......... 375 .........
WEST VIRGINIA
CHERRY RIVER BASIN, WV............................. .............. ......... ......... 150 .........
LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, WV........................... .............. ......... ......... 300 .........
OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, OH, .............. ......... ......... 600 .........
PA................................................
WISCONSIN
WAUWATOSA, WI...................................... .............. ......... 200 .......... .........
------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS........................ 33,356 7,727 1,760 83,207 30,306
NATIONAL PROGRAMS
AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT TRI-CADD..... 350 ......... ......... 350 .........
ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE INVESTIGATIONS....... 2,000 ......... ......... .......... .........
COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION...................... 1,400 ......... ......... 5,600 .........
Coastal Data Information Program............... .............. ......... ......... (1,000) .........
Pacific Island Land Ocean Typhoon Experiment, .............. ......... ......... (1,000) .........
HI............................................
Surge and Wave Island Modeling Studies, HI..... .............. ......... ......... (1,200) .........
Wave Data Study................................ .............. ......... ......... (1,000) .........
COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS......... 100 ......... ......... 100 .........
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES......................... 75 ......... ......... 75 .........
FEMA/MAP MOD COORDINATION.......................... 1,500 ......... ......... 1,500 .........
FLOOD DAMAGE DATA.................................. 220 ......... ......... 220 .........
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES.................... 8,000 ......... ......... 11,000 .........
White Clay Creek, New Castle, Delaware......... .............. ......... ......... (200) .........
Hurricane Evacuation Studies, Hawaii........... .............. ......... ......... (1,000) .........
Kekaha Flood Study, HI......................... .............. ......... ......... (100) .........
Iowa Multi-State Dam Safety Analyses, Iowa..... .............. ......... ......... (37) .........
Little Sioux Watershed, IA..................... .............. ......... ......... (30) .........
Mon--Maq Dam Removal Study & Local Floodplain .............. ......... ......... (100) .........
Mas...........................................
City of Gretna GIS, Louisiana.................. .............. ......... ......... (254) .........
East Baton Rouge Parish, LA [GIS].............. .............. ......... ......... (400) .........
Livingston Parish, LA (GIS).................... .............. ......... ......... (735) .........
Papillion Creek Watershed, Flood Plain Mapping, .............. ......... ......... (500) .........
Southeastern, PA............................... .............. ......... ......... (300) .........
HYDROLOGIC STUDIES................................. 250 ......... ......... 250 .........
INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW............................ 1,000 ......... ......... 1,000 .........
INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES........................ 200 ......... ......... 200 .........
NATIONAL SHORELINE STUDY........................... 375 ......... ......... 375 .........
OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS........................ 4,080 ......... ......... 4,580 .........
Lake Tahoe Coordination............................ .............. ......... ......... (500) .........
PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES...................... 7,000 ......... ......... 8,750 .........
Delaware Estuary Salinity Monitoring Study, .............. ......... ......... (200) .........
Dela- ware...................................
Bacon Creek, Sioux City, IA.................... .............. ......... ......... (50) .........
Boyer River, Missouri Valley, IA............... .............. ......... ......... (13) .........
Little Sioux Watershed, IA..................... .............. ......... ......... (30) .........
Kansas River Basin Technical Assistance, Kansas .............. ......... ......... (400) .........
Fife Lake Aquatic Weed Control, MI............. .............. ......... ......... (300) .........
Choctaw County Reservoir, MS................... .............. ......... ......... (100) .........
Jones County Water Supply, MS.................. .............. ......... ......... (50) .........
Mississippi Band of Choctaws, MS............... .............. ......... ......... (50) .........
Assessment of Bridges and Impacts on Flows and .............. ......... ......... (150) .........
F.............................................
Asheville, NC.................................. .............. ......... ......... (50) .........
PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM........................... 2,100 ......... ......... 3,100 .........
PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE)... 225 ......... ......... 225 .........
REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 150 ......... ......... 150 .........
SUPPORT...........................................
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT........................... 16,892 ......... ......... 28,000 .........
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation, Maryland......... .............. ......... ......... (1,000) .........
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS....... 50 ......... ......... 50 .........
STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY)............. 600 ......... ......... 600 .........
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS............................. 350 ......... ......... 350 .........
TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM......................... 1,000 ......... ......... 1,000 .........
WATER RESOURCES PRIORITIES STUDY................... 2,000 ......... ......... .......... .........
------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, NATIONAL PROGRAMS.................. 49,917 ......... ......... 67,375 .........
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE............................... .............. ......... ......... -16,648 .........
============================================================
TOTAL........................................ 83,273 7,727 1,760 133,934 30,306
GRAND TOTAL.................................. 91,000 91,000 ......... 166,000 .........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchorage Harbor Deepening, Alaska.--The Committee
recommended $500,000 to complete the feasibility study and to
initiate preconstruction engineering and design. Anchorage
harbor provides services to approximately 90 percent of the
total population of Alaska, including two military bases.
Valdez Harbor Expansion, Alaska.--The Committee recommends
$150,000 to complete the feasibility phase of the study. The
demand for moorage space in the harbor far exceeds the existing
capacity of 510 vessels. Rafting during the commercial fishing
season has been reported up to eight boats deep on a regular
basis.
May Branch, Fort Smith, Arkansas.--$500,000 is recommended
to continue preconstruction engineering and design for this
flood control project.
Bolinas Lagoon, California.--The Committee recommends
$350,000 to continue feasibility studies of providing solutions
that would restore and maintain a natural tidal prism
configuration and tidal circulation in the lagoon.
Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration, California.--
$590,000 is recommended to continue the feasibility studies for
environmental and historic riparian habitat restoration.
Potential projects may provide opportunities to restore
environmental conditions, improve water quality, public access,
open space and recreation. The potential projects will maintain
or improve the current level of flood damage reduction
benefits.
Malibu Creek Watershed, California.--The Committee
recommendation includes $150,000 to complete the draft
feasibility report of methods to manage the sediment to
facilitate ongoing efforts to improve the ecosystem in Malibu
Creek and lagoon.
Rock Creek and Keefer Slough, California.--$200,000 is
recommended to continue the feasibility phase of the study. The
primary project purposes include flood control with the use of
setback levees and floodwalls, and ecosystem restoration and
minimum maintenance. The flood control facilities are to be
designed with additional capacity to allow for the natural
development of habitat.
Sacramento-San Joaquin Comprehensive Study, California.--
The Committee recommended $1,000,000 for the feasibility study.
The study provides a long-range management program for the
Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins with the objective of
improving the flood carrying capacity of the system while
restoring and protecting environmental features including
wetlands as well as fish and wildlife habitat.
Chatfield, Cheery Creek and Bear Creek, Reservoirs.--The
recommendation includes $200,000 for feasibility studies to
convert flood control storage to water supply storage.
Basalt, Colorado.--The Committee recommended $50,000 to
review planning studies that were initiated under section 206
of the Continuing Authorities Program to determine if there is
a Federal interest in this ecosystem restoration project.
Flagler County, Florida.--$250,000 is recommended to
continue feasibility studies for shore damage reduction. The
Committee notes that recent storms have begun to threaten the
county's major evacuation route to State Road A1A.
Walton County, Florida.--$591,000 is recommended to
continue the preconstruction, engineering and design phase.
This study is a test bed for the Institute of Water Resources
Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction model.
Hilo Harbor Modifications, Hawaii.--The Committee
recommends $100,000 to initiate the reconnaissance study to
address the Federal interest in modifying the 1930s era
designed harbor to accommodate large modern cargo vessels and
improve safety in the harbor.
Interbasin Control of Great Lakes--Mississippi Aquatic
Nuisance Species, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Wisconsin.--The
Committee recommends $300,000 to initiate studies of the range
of options and technologies available to prevent the spread of
aquatic nuisance species between the Great lakes and the
Mississippi River Basins through various aquatic pathways.
Upper Mississippi River--Illinois Waterway Navigation
System, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.--
The Committee recommendation includes $10,000,000 for
continuation of preconstruction engineering and design studies.
The Committee recognizes the need to modernize this more than
60-year-old navigation system and has provided continued
funding for both structural design and environmental
restoration work.
Humbolt, Iowa.--The Committee recommends $152,000 to
initiate a cost-shared feasibility study that would investigate
ecosystem restoration on the West Fork of the Des Moines River
(fish passage, dam removal, dredging, tributary and floodplain
restoration) and ancillary recreational features.
Cross Lake, Louisiana.--$250,000 is recommended for
investigations of improvements to Cross Lake and alternative
sources of fresh water for Shreveport and Caddo Parish.
Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration, Louisiana.--
The Committee recommends $10,000,000 for these important
studies. The Committee has again elected not to fund a separate
Science and Technology line item under this study and directs
the Corps not to include this line item in the fiscal year 2010
budget. As has been previously stated by this Committee
worthwhile science work should be budgeted within the study
line item as is done for all other studies and projects. A
separate line item is superfluous.
The reduction made to these studies should not be viewed as
any diminution of support for these efforts, rather it is an
attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide
program among the various missions of the Corps.
To the extent practicable, the Committee directs the Corps
to expedite preconstruction engineering and design studies of a
sediment diversion at Myrtle Grove. The work should focus on
project performance using capacity to take sufficient advantage
of large pulsed flows during these less-than-annual high-flow
periods, and during river flood events, when a large amount of
sediment is freely available in the river water column. The
Committee further notes that the success of ongoing efforts to
bolster structural hurricane protection and rebuilding
hurricane damaged communities depends on arrest and reversal of
the coastal land lost problems in the near term, that
resolution of the land loss issue will require construction of
sediment reintroduction projects, such as the Myrtle Grove
diversion.
Chesapeake Bay, Susquehanna Reservoir Sediment Management,
Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia.--It has been estimated
that 280 million tons of sediment originating from the
Susquehanna River watershed are trapped behind the four
hydroelectric dams located on the Lower Susquehanna River
between Havre de Grace, Maryland, and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Three of the four dams Holtwood, Safe Harbor, and York Haven
have reached steady state. It is estimated that the Conowingo
Dam will cease to have trapping capacity in 15 to 20 years.
Once this last reservoir reaches steady state, the sediment
input to the bay may increase dramatically. The Committee
recommendation includes $200,000 for to examine the impact of
the Lower Susquehanna River Dams on sediment transport into the
Bay.
Minnesota River Basin, Minnesota.--The Committee
recommendation includes $350,000 for continuation of the
feasibility study. This study will evaluate projects/methods to
reduce flood damages, restore aquatic ecosystems, create
wildlife habitat, reduce erosion and sediment, and improve
water quality in the Minnesota River Basin and upper
Mississippi River.
Missouri River Degradation, Mile 340 to 400, Missouri and
Kansas.--The Committee recommended $588,000 to initiate
feasibility studies. The Missouri River in this reach has
experienced significant degradation or downcutting of the river
bed. There is a strong indication that this degradation could
impact navigation, flood control and other infrastructure in
the area.
Yellowstone River Corridor, Montana.--The Committee
recommendation includes $500,000 to continue feasibility
studies.
Delaware Basin Comprehensive, New Jersey.--The Committee
recommended $290,000 to continue evaluation of alternative
solutions to the region's problems regarding flooding and
environmental restoration along the New Jersey portion of the
Delaware River and tributaries.
Western Lake Erie Basin Study, Ohio, Indiana and
Michigan.--$250,000 is recommended to continue the
Comprehensive investigation of measures to improve fish and
wildlife habitat, navigation, flood damage reduction,
recreation, and water quality in the Maumee, Ottawa and Portage
River watersheds.
Walla Walla River Basin, Oregon and Washington.--$500,000
is recommended to continue preconstruction, engineering and
design studies for environmental restoration of the watershed;
focusing primarily on establishing year round instream flows.
Neches River Basin, Texas.--$100,000 is recommended to
initiate reconnaissance studies for flood damage reduction,
ecosystem restoration, water supply, and recreation
possibilities within the watershed.
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Replacement at Deep
Creek, Chesapeake, Virginia.--The Committee recommendation
includes $500,000 to continue preconstruction engineering and
design phase of the replacement bridge.
Montpelier, Vermont.--The Committee recommendation includes
$750,000 to initiate feasibility studies of flood damage
reduction on the Winooski River.
Vicinity of Willoughby Spit, Norfolk, Virginia.--The
Committee recommendation includes $200,000 to continue the
general reevaluation study of the shore protection project that
was severely damaged by Hurricane Isabel.
Actions for Change to Improve Investigations.--The
Committee did not recommend funding for this item. The
Committee believes that the activities proposed in the budget
request for this line item should be incorporated into the
various funded planning activities that the Corps has underway.
Planning Support Program.--The Committee has recommended an
additional $1,000,000 above the budget request to support the
Planning Centers of Expertise. A portion of these funds should
be provided to the National Planning Center of Expertise for
Coastal Storm Damage Reduction to develop a process for
managing shore protection projects as part of a systems
approach to coastal protection for the purpose of achieving
improved project performance, increased cost effectiveness, and
enhanced benefits.
Other Coordination Programs.--$500,000 is recommended for
Lake Tahoe coordination activities.
Planning Assistance to States.--The Committee
recommendation includes $9,000,000 for this nationwide cost-
shared program. The Committee recognizes that there are
hundreds of these studies on-going at any given time. The
Committee has provided a listing in the table of projects that
should be given priority if cost sharing funds are available
from the local sponsors.
Coastal Field Data Collection.--The Committee has
recommended $5,600,000 for this nationwide program. In addition
to budgeted funds, $4,200,000 has been recommended to continue
the Coastal Data Information Program; Surge and Wave Island
Modeling Studies, Hawaii; the Pacific Island Land Ocean Typhoon
Experiment Program and the Wave Data Study. The California
Beach Processes Study has been incorporated into the Coastal
Data Information Program. These are all studies that have been
underway for a number of years and the Committee supports their
continuation.
Flood Plain Management Services Program.--The Committee
recommendation includes $11,000,000. The Committee has
recommended a listing in the table of projects that should be
given priority if cost sharing funds are available from the
local sponsors.
Research and Development.--The Committee has included
$28,000,000 for the Corps nationwide research and development
programs. The Committee believes that this is an important area
of the Corps' program that should be supported and has
recommended $11,108,000 above the budget request. Within the
funds recommended, the Corps should continue submerged aquatic
vegetation research in the Chesapeake Bay.
CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $2,294,029,000
Budget estimate, 2009\1\................................ 1,402,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,004,500,000
\1\Excludes emergency appropriations of $5,761,000,000.
This appropriation includes funds for construction, major
rehabilitation and related activities for water resources
development projects having navigation, flood and storm damage
reduction, water supply, hydroelectric, environmental
restoration, and other attendant benefits to the Nation. The
construction and major rehabilitation for designated projects
for inland and costal waterways will derive one-half of the
funding from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. Funds to be
derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund will be applied
to cover the Federal share of the Dredged Material Disposal
Facilities Program.
The Committee has previously stated its rejection of the
administration's proposal to move projects from this account to
the Operations and Maintenance account.
Consequently, the Committee has elected to display the
President's budget request as if these projects had been
requested in the CG account rather than the O&M account. This
makes the actual budget request for CG, $1,666,775,000 rather
than $1,402,000,000 as requested in the budget. The projects
moved from the O&M request include:
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Name Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Columbia River Fish Recovery OR & WA.................. $95,700
Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Recovery, IA, KS, MO, 85,000
MT, NE, ND, SD.......................................
Chief Joseph Dam Gas Abatement, WA.................... 6,500
Howard Hanson Dam Ecosystem Restoration, WA........... 15,000
Williamette River Temperature Control, OR............. 3,331
Lower Snake River, WA & OR............................ 1,500
Assategue, MD......................................... 500
Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, NJ............ 150
Folly Beach, SC....................................... 35
Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, NY.................. 500
Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, NJ.................. 2,500
Delaware Bay Coastline, Roosevelt Inlet to Lewes 350
Beach, DE............................................
Houston Ship Channel, TX.............................. 500
Section 111 Program................................... 5,325
Poplar Island, MD..................................... 9,185
Dredged Material Disposal Facilities.................. 8,965
Indiana Harbor (Confined Disposal Facility), IN....... 8,385
Section 204/145....................................... 2,278
Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, OR and WA.............. 3,123
Markland Locks & Dam, KY & IL......................... 10,600
Locks No. 27, Mississippi River, IL................... 2,598
Lock and Dam 11, Mississippi River, IA................ 2,750
-----------------
TOTAL Projects Migrating from Construction to 264,775
O&M............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The projects that included in the line item above for
Dredged Material Disposal Facilities are listed in the
Construction, General table.
Due to constrained funding, the Committee reduced the
requested amounts for some administration projects. This should
not be perceived as a lack of support for any of these
projects, rather it is an attempt by the Committee to balance
out the program across the Nation and fund most of the projects
or studies that were funded in fiscal year 2008 but were not
addressed by the administration proposal.
Even with a $559,000,000 increase to the Corps' accounts,
the Committee is unable to address all of the needs. By the
Committee's estimate, less than 60 percent of the needed
funding is available for this account. Construction schedules
will slip due to this constrained funding. This will result in
deferred benefits to the national economy. The Committee does
not believe that there is any way to prioritize our way out of
this problem without serious unintended consequences. Adequate
resources have been denied for too long. Only providing
adequate resources for these national investments will resolve
this situation.
The Committee has included a limited number of new
construction starts as well as provided completion funding for
a number of projects. As in the General Investigations account,
the Committee has embraced the traditional view of new starts.
New starts are generally defined as those projects that have
not received Construction, General funding in the past or those
that required new authorization to undertake the work. The
Committee has not included the administration's proposed new
construction starts for the lower Monumental Lock and Dam,
Washington, major rehabilitation study that was proposed for
funding in the Operations and Maintenance account because it
would be cost-shared with the Inland Waterway Trust Fund.
The appropriation provides funds for the Continuing
Authorities Program (projects which do not require specific
authorizing legislation), which includes projects for flood
control (section 205), emergency streambank and shoreline
protection (section 14), beach erosion control (section 103),
mitigation of shore damages (section 111), navigation projects
(section 107), snagging and clearing (section 208), aquatic
ecosystem restoration (section 206), beneficial uses of dredged
material (section 204), and project modifications for
improvement of the environment (section 1135).
The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are
shown on the following table:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project title Budget estimate recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
MOBILE HARBOR TURNING BASIN, AL....... ............... 3,400
PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, AL......... ............... 1,400
TUSCALOOSA, AL........................ ............... 7,500
ALASKA
AKUTAN HARBOR, AK..................... ............... 3,000
ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK............ ............... 4,500
HAINES BOAT HARBOR, AK................ ............... 1,000
SEWARD HARBOR BREAKWATER EXTENSION.... ............... 1,000
ST. PAUL HARBOR, AK................... ............... 2,000
UNALASKA, AK.......................... ............... 6,000
ARIZONA
NOGALES WASH, AZ...................... ............... 3,000
RIO DE FLAG FLAGSTAFF, AZ............. ............... 3,000
TRES RIOS, AZ......................... ............... 3,000
ARKANSAS
OZARK--JETA TAYLOR POWERHOUSE, AR 17,300 17,300
(MAJOR REHAB)........................
RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAN, LA, AR & ............... 2,500
TX...................................
RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, ............... 4,000
AR & LA..............................
WHITE RIVER MINIMUM FLOW, AR.......... ............... 2,000
CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON 13,000 13,000
FEATURES) , CA.......................
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM 9,000 9,000
MODIFICATIONS), CA...................
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM ............... 2,000
RAISE), CA...........................
CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA.... ............... 5,000
GUADALUPE RIVER, CA................... ............... 5,000
HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS 4,900 4,900
RESTORATION, CA......................
HARBOR/SOUTH BAY WATER RECYCLING ............... 3,000
PROJECT, CA..........................
KAWEAH RIVER, CA...................... 1,000 1,000
LLAGAS CREEK, CA...................... ............... 400
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA.. 5,700 5,700
MID VALLEY AREA LEVEE, CA............. ............... 1,500
MURRIETA CREEK, CA.................... ............... 5,000
NAPA RIVER, CA........................ 7,395 11,000
OAKLAND HARBOR (50-FOOT PROJECT), CA.. 25,092 24,000
PETALUMA RIVER, CA.................... ............... 350
PORT LOS ANGELES HARBOR MAIN CHANNEL ............... 885
DEEPENING, CA........................
SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA. 900 900
SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION 23,968 23,968
PROJECT, CA..........................
SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GRR, ............... 500
CA...................................
SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA ............... 500
IRRIGATION, CA.......................
SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA..... ............... 1,000
SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA................ ............... 750
SAN RAMON VALLEY RECYCLED WATER, CA... ............... 3,500
SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA.......... 8,100 14,000
SANTA MARIA RIVER LEVEES, CA.......... ............... 6,000
SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA... 12,000 12,000
SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER, CA (DAM 8,000 8,000
SAFETY)..............................
SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (ENLARGEMENT), ............... 500
CA...................................
TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA........... ............... 3,000
UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA............. ............... 5,000
UPPER NEWPORT BAY, CA................. ............... 3,000
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA................... ............... 2,000
YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA.................. ............... 3,000
CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 500
INFRASTRUCTURE, CT...................
DELAWARE
DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT ............... 350
INLET TO LEWES BEACH.................
DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE......... ............... 390
FLORIDA
BREVARD COUNTY, FL.................... ............... 500
CEDAR HAMMOCK, WARES CREEK, FL........ 2,773 2,773
FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY ............... 2,200
IMPROVEMENTS, FL.....................
HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE 77,400 77,400
CONTROL).............................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL............... ............... 3,500
LAKE WORTH SAND TRANSFER PLANT, FL.... ............... 1,000
MIAMI HARBOR, FL...................... ............... 500
PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL............... ............... 1,000
SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM 185,000 130,000
RESTORATION, FL......................
Central and Southern Florida, FL.. (100,188) (95,188)
Everglades and S. Florida (3,797) (3,797)
Ecosystem Restoration............
Kissimmee River, FL............... (31,015) (31,015)
Modified Water Deliveries, FL..... (50,000) ...............
ST. LUCIE INLET, FL................... 4,000 4,000
TAMPA HARBOR, FL...................... ............... 500
GEORGIA
ATLANTA, EI, GA....................... ............... 2,000
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & 1,450 1,450
SC...................................
HAWAII IAO STREAMS, HI................ ............... 500
IDAHO
RURAL IDAHO........................... ............... 4,000
ILLINOIS
CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI 2,500 2,500
RIVER, IL (DEF CORR).................
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL 5,750 5,750
DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL................
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, 500 500
SECOND BARRIER, IL...................
CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL................. 1,000 4,000
DES PLAINES RIVER, IL................. 5,620 8,000
EAST ST. LOUIS, IL.................... 200 1,207
EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL....... ............... 375
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, LOCKPORT LOCK AND 28,600 28,600
DAM, IL (REPLACEM....................
LOCK AND DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL ............... 2,598
(MAJOR REHAB)........................
MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL.... 34,000 34,000
NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, ............... 300
IL...................................
OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL 114,000 114,000
& KY.................................
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, 20,000 18,000
IL, IA, MN, MO &.....................
WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL.................. 684 3,700
INDIANA
NDIANA HARBOR CONFIND DISPOSAL ............... 8,385
FACILITY, IN\1\......................
LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN.............. 8,000 8,000
IOWA
DAVENPORT, IA......................... ............... 4,850
DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, IA..... ............... 5,000
DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND ............... 3,900
GREENBELT, IA........................
LOCK AND DAM 11, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IA ............... 2,750
(MAJOR REHAB)........................
MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA, ............... 70,000
KS, MO, MT, NE \1\...................
PERRY CREEK, IA....................... ............... 3,800
KANSAS
TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO........... 10,000 10,000
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS (DAM SAFETY).... 23,800 23,800
KENTUCKY
KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE 22,330 22,330
RIVER, KY............................
MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY, IL (MAJOR ............... 10,600
REHAB)\1\............................
MCALPINE LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, KY 6,270 6,270
& IN.................................
WOLF CREEK, KY (SEEPAGE CONTROL)...... 57,000 57,000
LOUISIANA
COMITE RIVER DIVERSION CANAL, LA...... ............... 10,000
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA (FC)...... ............... 2,000
INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK ............... 2,000
REPLACEMENT, LA......................
J BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA....... 1,500 8,500
LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (CG)...... ............... 2,500
OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA............. ............... 1,600
MARYLAND
ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD & ............... 30
DC...................................
ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD\1\.............. ............... 1,900
ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD........ ............... 200
BALTIMORE METRO RESOURCES, GWYNNS ............... 500
FALLS, MD............................
CHARLESTOWN, MD....................... ............... 50
CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 2,500
RESTORATION AND PROTECTION...........
CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & ............... 2,000
VA...................................
CUMBERLAND, MD........................ ............... 200
POPLAR ISLAND, MD\1\.................. ............... 12,000
MASSASSACHUSETTS
MUDDY RIVER, MA....................... 4,000 5,000
MICHIGAN
GENESEE COUNTY, MI.................... ............... 600
GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM ............... 2,500
RESTORATION, MI......................
NEGAUNEE, MI.......................... ............... 500
SAULT STE. MARIE, MI.................. ............... 2,000
MINNESOTA
BRECKENRIDGE, MN...................... ............... 2,877
CROOKSTON, MN......................... 300 300
LOCK AND DAM 3, MISSISSIPPI RIVER ............... 2,000
(MAJOR REHAB), MN....................
MISSISSIPPI
DESOTO COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER ............... 4,860
SYSTEM, MS...........................
MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 18,000
INFRASTRUCTURE, MS...................
MISSOURI
BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO..... ............... 2,000
BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO... 1,700 1,700
CHESTERFIELD, MO...................... ............... 3,000
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL). 25,000 25,000
MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS 5,011 5,011
(REG WORKS), MO......................
MISSOURI & MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ............... 1,500
ENHANCEMENT, MO......................
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (L-385), ............... 2,600
MO, IA, NE & KS......................
ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO........ 2,000 3,750
SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS ............... 2,000
CITY, MO.............................
MONTANA
FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT........ ............... 1,500
RURAL MONTANA, MT..................... ............... 5,000
NEBRASKA
ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NE........... 4,828 4,828
MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, ............... 1,000
NE & SD..............................
SAND CREEK, SAUNDERS COUNTY, NE....... ............... 2,400
WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND CLEAR CREEK, ............... 3,000
NE...................................
NEVADA
RURAL, NV (EI)........................ ............... 18,000
NEW JERSEY
BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR, 11,700 11,700
NJ (NJ SHORE PROT....................
BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR ............... 3,000
INLET (ABSECON IS....................
BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR ............... 80
INLET, BRIGANTINE....................
CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, ............... 2,500
NJ\1\................................
DELAWARE RIVER MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, ............... 5,000
NJ, PA & DE..........................
GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, ............... 3,000
NJ...................................
GREAT EGG HARBOR TO TOWNSENDS INLET, ............... 250
NJ...................................
HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ............ ............... 100
JOSEPH G. MINISH WATERFRONT, NJ....... ............... 4,000
LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY ............... 150
POINT, NJ\1\.........................
PASSAIC RIVER PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ............... 1,500
STORAGE AREAS, NJ....................
RAMAPO RIVER AT MAHWAH AND SUFFERN, NJ ............... 500
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT ............... 2,000
MONMOUTH, NJ.........................
RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB- 10,000 10,000
BASIN, NJ............................
SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ...... ............... 2,000
TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ. ............... 3,000
NEW MEXICO
ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM........ ............... 2,400
ALAMOGORDO, NM........................ 4,200 4,200
CENTRAL NEW MEXICO, NM................ ............... 5,000
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, ............... 800
BERNALILLO TO BELE...................
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NM..... ............... 24,016
NEW MEXICO (Environmental ............... 7,000
Infrastructure), NM..................
RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO 800 800
BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM................
SOUTHWEST VALLEY ALBUQUERQUE, NM...... ............... 8,000
NEW YORK
ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, LONG ............... 100
BEACH ISLAND, NY.....................
ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET 3,800 3,800
TO NORTON POINT,.....................
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET ............... 750
& JAMAICA BAY, NY....................
FIRE ISAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY\1\ ............... 500
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY 2,150 2,150
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & 90,000 85,000
NJ...................................
NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY........... ............... 1,000
NORTH CAROLINA
BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC.......... ............... 250
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC................. ............... 2,000
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC................ ............... 300
NORTH DAKOTA
GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND 3,500 3,500
(REPLACEMENT)........................
LAKE SAKAKAWEA PROJECT, ND............ ............... 17,048
MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND........ ............... 1,000
NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL ............... 10,000
INFRASTRUCTURE, ND...................
OHIO
METROPOLITAN REGION OF CINCINNATI, 4,000 4,000
DUCK CREEK, OH.......................
OKLAHOMA
CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY).......... 21,200 21,200
OREGON
COLUMBIA RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, 36,000 36,000
OR & WA..............................
COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS 2,455 2,455
SITES, OR & WA.......................
ELK CREEK LAKE, OR.................... 3,120 3,120
WILLAMETTE TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR\1\. ............... 3,331
PENNSYLVANIA
EMSWORTH L&D, OHIO RIVER, PA (STATIC 25,800 25,800
INSTABILITY CORRE....................
GRAYS LANDING LOCK AND DAM, 600 600
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................
LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA........ ............... 4,782
LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3, AND 4, 40,806 19,050
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................
POINT MARION, LOCK AND DAM 8, 150 150
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA &..............
PRESQUE ISLE, PA...................... ............... 1,000
WYOMING VALLEY (LEVEE RAISING), PA.... ............... 3,000
PUERTO RICO
PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR....... 45,000 43,000
RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR.................. 12,000 12,000
SOUTH CAROLINA
FOLLY BEACH, SC\1\.................... ............... 35
SOUTH DAKOTA
BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD...... ............... 4,000
CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER ............... 4,000
BRULE SIOUX, SD......................
TENNESSEE
CENTER HILL DAM, TN (SEEPAGE CONTROL). 53,400 53,400
CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN. 42,000 42,000
TEXAS
BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX.............. 5,382 5,382
CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER ............... 500
TRINITY RIVER, TX....................
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX....... ............... 2,000
DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY ............... 13,000
RIVER, TX............................
HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, 21,700 19,700
TX...................................
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX\1\........... ............... 500
JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ............... 2,000
ARLINGTON, TX........................
RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & ............... 1,500
OK...................................
SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX... ............... 10,000
SIMS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX............... 23,465 21,465
TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX................ ............... 3,000
UTAH
RURAL UTAH, UT (EI)................... ............... 12,000
VERMONT
BURLINGTON HARBOR, VT................. ............... 500
LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATE, VT. ............... 2,000
VIRGINIA
JAMES RIVER DEEPWATER TURNING BASIN, ............... 1,763
VA...................................
JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC 14,000 14,000
(REPLACEMENT)........................
LYNCHBURG CSO, VA..................... ............... 300
NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS ............... 1,000
(DEEPENING), VA......................
RICHMOND CSO, VA...................... ............... 300
ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS 1,075 1,075
AREA, VA.............................
VIRGINIA BEACH (HURRICANE PROTECTION), ............... 3,000
VA...................................
WASHINGTON
CHIEF JOSEPH GAS ABATEMENT, WA\1\..... ............... 2,500
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR & ............... 92,000
WA\1\................................
DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA.... ............... 3,000
HOWARD HANSEN DAM, WA\1\.............. ............... 15,000
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM 1,500 1,500
RESTORATION, OR & WA.................
LOWER MONUMENT LOCK & DAM, WA\1\...... ............... ...............
LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE ............... 1,500
COMP, WA, OR, ID\1\..................
MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA. 1,410 4,410
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA (FISH PASSAGE)... 1,000 1,000
PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS ............... 621
RESTORATION, WA......................
SHOALWATER BAY SHORELINE, WA.......... ............... 2,000
WEST VIRGINIA
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV (DAM SAFETY 12,000 12,000
ASSURANCE)...........................
GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV............ ............... 1,500
ISLAND CREEK BASIN IN AND AROUND ............... 200
LOGAN, WV............................
LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER
CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA:
Virgina........................... ............... 8,000
West Virginia..................... ............... 8,500
LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV........... ............... 1,050
MARMET LOCK, KANAWHA RIVER, WV........ 9,000 9,000
ROBERT C. BYRD LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO 1,000 1,000
RIVER, WV & OH.......................
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV............ 900 900
WISCONSIN
MILWAUKEE HARBOR CDF EXPANSION, WI.... ............... 1,600
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS........... 1,296,684 1,897,220
NATIONAL PROGRAMS
ABANDONED MINE RESTORATION............ ............... 1,000
ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE 4,600 ...............
CONSTRUCTION.........................
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM......... 3,500 4,550
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM:
AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 10,295 25,000
(SECTION 206)....................
Chattahoochee Fall Line ............... ...............
Ecosystem, AL & GA...........
Brownsville Branch, AR........ ............... ...............
St. Helena--Napa River ............... ...............
Project, CA..................
Sweetwater Reservoir Ecosystem ............... ...............
Restoration, CA..............
Upper York Creek Dam Removal, ............... ...............
CA...........................
Arkansas River Habitat ............... ...............
Restoration Project, CO......
Blue River, CO................ ............... ...............
Goose Creek, CO............... ............... ...............
Lower Boulder Creek, CO....... ............... ...............
North Fork Gunnison River, CO. ............... ...............
Tamarisk Eradication, CO...... ............... ...............
Rose Bay, Voluisia Co, FL..... ............... ...............
Jackson Creek, GA............. ............... ...............
Mokuhinia/Mokuula Restoration, ............... ...............
HI...........................
Emiquon Preserve, IL.......... ............... ...............
Eugene Field, IL.............. ............... ...............
Hofmann Dam, IL............... ............... ...............
Orland Park, IL............... ............... ...............
Squaw Creek, (Round Lake ............... ...............
Drain), IL...................
Chariton River/Rathbun Lake, ............... ...............
IA...........................
Duck Creek, Davenport, IA..... ............... ...............
Whitebreast Creek Watershed, ............... ...............
IA...........................
Storm Lake, IA................ ............... ...............
Ventura Marsh Habitat, Clear ............... ...............
Lake, IA.....................
Buras Marina, LA.............. ............... ...............
Lake Killarney, Louisiana ............... ...............
State Penitentiary, LA.......
Lake Verret, Assumption ............... ...............
Parish, LA...................
Mandeville Ecosystem ............... ...............
Restoration, LA..............
University Lakes, Baton Rouge, ............... ...............
LA...........................
Vermillion River Ecosystem ............... ...............
Restoration, LA..............
Zemurray Park Lake ............... ...............
Restoration, Tangipahoa Paris
Milford Pond Restoration, ............... ...............
Milford, MA..................
Deep Run/Tiber Hudson, Howard ............... ...............
County, MD...................
Dog Island Shoals, MD......... ............... ...............
Greenbury Point, MD........... ............... ...............
North Beach, MD............... ............... ...............
Northwest Branch, Anacostia ............... ...............
River, MD....................
Pleasure Island, MD........... ............... ...............
Urieville Lake, MD............ ............... ...............
Western Branch, Patuxent ............... ...............
River, MD....................
Wright's Creek, Dorchester ............... ...............
Creek, MD....................
Marion Aquatic Ecosystem ............... ...............
Restoration, MI..............
Painter Creek, MN............. ............... ...............
Musconetcong River Dam ............... ...............
Removals, NJ.................
Pennsville, Salem County, NJ.. ............... ...............
Rancocas Creek Fish Passage, ............... ...............
NJ...........................
Kings Park, NY................ ............... ...............
Lower Hempstead Harbor, NY.... ............... ...............
Soundview Park, Bronx, NY..... ............... ...............
Asheville, Buncombe County, NC ............... ...............
Concord Streams Restoration, ............... ...............
NC...........................
Heron Haven, NE............... ............... ...............
Wilson Bay Restoration, NC.... ............... ...............
Drayton Dam, ND............... ............... ...............
Christine/Hickson Dams, ND.... ............... ...............
Incline and Third Creeks, NV.. ............... ...............
Blue Hole Lake State Park, NM. ............... ...............
Bottomless Lakes State Park, ............... ...............
NM...........................
Janes-Wallace Memorial Dam, ............... ...............
Santa Rosa, NM...............
Olentangy 5th Avenue Dam, OH.. ............... ...............
Arrowhead Creek, OR........... ............... ...............
Beaver Creek, OR.............. ............... ...............
Eugene Delta Ponds, OR........ ............... ...............
Camp Creek--Zumwalt Prairie, ............... ...............
OR...........................
Springfield Millrace, OR...... ............... ...............
Codorus Creek Watershed ............... ...............
Restoration, PA..............
Winneapaug Pond Restoration, ............... ...............
RI...........................
Spring Lake, San Marcos, TX... ............... ...............
Stephenville, WWTP, TX........ ............... ...............
Tangier Island, Accomack ............... ...............
County, VA...................
Carpenter Creek, WA........... ............... ...............
BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED ............... 7,187
MATERIAL (SECTION 204,...........
Isle Aux Herbes, AL........... ............... ...............
Blackhawk Bottoms, IA......... ............... ...............
Atchafalaya River, Shell ............... ...............
Island, St. Mary Parish......
Barataria Bay Waterway, LA.... ............... ...............
Calc Rv, Mi 5-14 Ks, LA....... ............... ...............
Shell Island Pass, LA......... ............... ...............
Newburyport Harbor, MA........ ............... ...............
21st Avenue West Channel, ............... ...............
Duluth, MN...................
Wanchese Marsh Creation, NC... ............... ...............
Maumee Bay Restoration, OH.... ............... ...............
Wynn Road CDF, OH............. ............... ...............
Restoration of Cat Islands, WI ............... ...............
EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE 2,301 10,000
PROTECTION (SEC..................
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 2,617 43,123
205).............................
Wynne, AR..................... ............... ...............
Cosgrove Creek, Calaveras ............... ...............
County, CA...................
Las Gallinas Creek/Santa ............... ...............
Venetia Levee, CA............
White Slough, CA.............. ............... ...............
Oak Creek, Florence, Colorado. ............... ...............
Little Mill Creek, New Castle ............... ...............
County, DE...................
Pennsylvania Avenue ............... ...............
Improvement Project, Bethany.
Turkey Creek, Ben Hill County, ............... ...............
GA...........................
Keopu-Hienaloli Stream, HI.... ............... ...............
Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, HI..... ............... ...............
Wailele Stream, Oahu, HI...... ............... ...............
Indian/Dry Creek Cedar Rapids, ............... ...............
IA...........................
Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA...... ............... ...............
Red Oak Creek, Red Oak, IA.... ............... ...............
Winnebago River, Mason City, ............... ...............
IA...........................
Crosscreek, Rossville, KS..... ............... ...............
Concordia, KS................. ............... ...............
Eureka Creek, Manhattan, KS... ............... ...............
Hopkinsville Dry-Dam, KY...... ............... ...............
Bayou Choupique, St. Mary ............... ...............
Parish, LA...................
Bayou Queue de Tortue, ............... ...............
Vermillion Parish, LA........
Town of Carencro, Lafayette ............... ...............
Parish, LA...................
Elkton, MD.................... ............... ...............
North River, Peabody, MA...... ............... ...............
Salisbury RIver, Brockton, MA. ............... ...............
Ada, MN....................... ............... ...............
Montevideo, MN................ ............... ...............
Granite Falls, MN............. ............... ...............
McKinney Bayou, Tunica County, ............... ...............
MS...........................
Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, ............... ...............
MO...........................
Livingston, MT................ ............... ...............
Little River Diversion, ............... ...............
Dutchtown, MO................
Platte River, Fremont, NE..... ............... ...............
Platte River, Schuyler, NE.... ............... ...............
Randolph, NE (Middle Logan ............... ...............
Creek).......................
Jewett Brook, Laconia, NH..... ............... (100)
Hatch, NM..................... ............... ...............
Assunpink Creek, Hamilton ............... ...............
Township, Mercer County, NJ..
Jackson Brook, NJ............. ............... ...............
Mill Brook, Highland Park, NJ. ............... ...............
Pennsville, NJ................ ............... ...............
Poplar Brook, Deal and Ocean ............... ...............
Township, NJ.................
Upper Passaic River and ............... ...............
Tributaries, Long Hill
Township, NJ.................
Port Jervis, NY............... ............... ...............
Pigeon River Watershed, NC.... ............... ...............
Swannanoa River Watershed, NC. ............... ...............
Wahpeton, ND.................. ............... ...............
Rio Descalabrado, PR.......... ............... ...............
Rio Guamani-Guaya, PR......... ............... ...............
Blanchard River, Ottawa, OH... ............... ...............
Duck Creek Flood Warning ............... ...............
System, OH...................
Findley, OH................... ............... ...............
Independence, OH.............. ............... ...............
Philadelphia Shipyard Sea ............... ...............
Wall, Philadelphia, PA.......
Beaver Creek & Tribs, Bristol, ............... ...............
TN...........................
Farmers Branch, Tarrant ............... ...............
County, TX...................
Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX.. ............... ...............
WV Statewide Flood Warning ............... ...............
System, WV...................
NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107).. 559 8,000
Savoonga Harbor, AK........... ............... ...............
Kahoolawe Harbor, Kahoolawe, ............... ...............
HI...........................
North Kohala Navigation ............... ...............
Improvements, HI.............
Port Fourchon Extension, ............... ...............
Lafourche Parish, LA.........
Shortcut Canal, Terrebonne ............... ...............
Parish, LA...................
Bass Harbor, ME............... ............... ...............
Round Pond, Bristol, ME....... ............... ...............
St. Jerome's Creek, St. Mary ............... ...............
County, MD...................
Mackinac Isle, Harbor ............... ...............
Breakwall, MI................
Northwestern Michigan, ............... ...............
Traverse City, MI............
Ontonagon Channel Extension, ............... ...............
MI...........................
Grand Marais Harbor of Refuge, ............... ...............
MN...........................
McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, ............... ...............
Duluth, MN...................
Hampton Harbor, NH............ ............... ...............
Ottawa River Navigation, ............... ...............
Toledo, OH...................
Delaware River, Fairless ............... ...............
Turning Basin, PA............
Charlestown Breachway and ............... ...............
Inlet, RI....................
Northwest Tennessee Harbor, TN ............... ...............
Nassawadox Creek, VA.......... ............... ...............
MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES ............... 10,000
(SECTION 111)\1\.................
Mobile Pass, AL............... ............... ...............
Camp Ellis, Saco, ME.......... ............... ...............
Vermillion, OH................ ............... ...............
Fairport Harbor, OH........... ............... ...............
Mattituck Harbor, NY.......... ............... ...............
Tybee Island Channel Impacts, ............... ...............
GA...........................
PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF 6,544 25,000
THE ENVIRONMENT (SECTION 1135)...
Lower Cache Restoration, AR... ............... ...............
Millwood Lake, Grassy Lake, AR ............... ...............
Rock Creek @ Boyle Park, ............... ...............
Little Rock, AR..............
Tujunga Wash Environmental ............... ...............
Restoration, CA..............
Lower Kingman Island, DC...... ............... ...............
Kanaha Pond, Maui, HI......... ............... ...............
Kaunakakai Str, Molokai, HI... ............... ...............
Rathbun Lake Habitat ............... ...............
Restoration, IA..............
Indian Ridge Marsh, Chicago, ............... ...............
IL...........................
Green River Dam, Mod, KY...... ............... ...............
Bayou Desiard, Monroe, LA..... ............... ...............
Frazier/Whitehorse Oxbow Lake ............... ...............
Weir, LA.....................
Lake Fausse Pointe, Iberia ............... ...............
Parish, LA...................
Lake St. Joseph, Tensas ............... ...............
Parish, LA...................
Morganza Fore-Bay Restoration, ............... ...............
LA...........................
Sea Lamprey Barrier Program, ............... ...............
MI...........................
Lake Whittington Weir, MS & AR ............... ...............
Sand Hill River, MN........... ............... ...............
Duck Creek, MO................ ............... ...............
Bloomington State Park, MO.... ............... ...............
Blue Valley Wetlands, Jackson, ............... ...............
MO...........................
Prison Farm, ND............... ............... ...............
Assunpink Creek, Trenton, NJ.. ............... ...............
Lincoln Park West, Ecosystem ............... ...............
Restoration Study,...........
Pine Mount Creek, NJ.......... ............... ...............
Pond Creek Salt Marsh ............... ...............
Restoration, Cape May County,
NJ...........................
Las Cruces Dam Environmental ............... ...............
Restoration, Dona Ana County,
NM...........................
Pueblo of Santa Ana Aquatic ............... ...............
Restoration, NM..............
Route 66 Environmental ............... ...............
Restoration, Albuquerque, NM.
Spring Creek, NY.............. ............... ...............
Belhaven Harbor, NC........... ............... ...............
Tappan Lake, OH............... ............... ...............
Lower Columbia Slough, OR..... ............... ...............
Eagleland Ecosystem, TX....... ............... ...............
Lake Champlain Lamprey ............... ...............
Barriers, VT.................
Village of Oyster, Northampton ............... ...............
County, VA...................
Braided Reach, WA............. ............... ...............
Shorty's Island, WA........... ............... ...............
SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103).... ............... 7,500
Athol Springs, Lake Erie, NY.. ............... ...............
Lasalle Park, Buffalo, NY..... ............... ...............
Old Lakeshore Road, NY........ ............... ...............
Lake Erie At Painesville, OH.. ............... ...............
Philadelphia Shipyard, PA..... ............... ...............
Ft. San Geronimo, PR.......... ............... ...............
Veteren's Drive Shoreline, St. ............... ...............
Thomas, VI...................
Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, ............... ...............
Hampton, VA..................
Lincoln Park Beach Seattle, WA ............... ...............
SNAGGING AND CLEARING (SECTION ............... 500
208).............................
Muscatatuck River Log Jam, ............... ...............
Scott County, IN.............
Oran, MO...................... ............... ...............
Blackwell Lake, Blackwell, OK. ............... ...............
DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY 48,600 48,650
CORRECTION PROGRAM...................
Dam Safety Assurance Studies:
Isabella Dam, CA.............. ............... ...............
Martis Creek Dam, CA & NV..... ............... ...............
Cherry Creek Dam, CO.......... ............... ...............
Dworshak Dam, ID.............. ............... ...............
Mississippi Lock and Dam 25, ............... ...............
MO...........................
John Day Lock and Dam, OR & WA ............... ...............
Seepage/Stability Correction Major
Rehabilitation Study:
Hidden Dam, CA................ ............... ...............
Whittier Narrows Dam, CA...... ............... ...............
Hop Brook Dam, CT............. ............... ...............
Mansfield Hollow Dam, CT...... ............... ...............
Lake Shelbyville Dam, IL...... ............... ...............
Green River Lake Dam, KY...... ............... ...............
J. Edward Roush Dam, KY....... ............... ...............
Nolin Lake dam, KY............ ............... ...............
Rough River Lake Dam, KY...... ............... ...............
Salamonie Lake Dam, KY........ ............... ...............
Beach City Dam, OH............ ............... ...............
Bolivar Dam, OH............... ............... ...............
Mohawk Dam, OH................ ............... ...............
Zoar Levee (Dover Dam), OH.... ............... ...............
Keystone lake Dam, OK......... ............... ...............
East Branch Dam, Clarion ............... ...............
River, PA....................
Montgomery Locks and Dam, PA.. ............... ...............
Addicks Dam, Buffalo Bayou, TX ............... ...............
Lewisville Dam, TX............ ............... ...............
Ball Mountain Dam, VT......... ............... ...............
DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITIES ............... 8,965
PROGRAM (DMDF).......................
Savannah Harbor, GA............... ............... ...............
Rogue River, MI................... ............... ...............
Charleston Harbor, SC............. ............... ...............
Green Bay Harbor, WI.............. ............... ...............
EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION................ 21,000 21,000
ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC 5,000 1,000
LAW 106-457).........................
INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--BOARD 50 50
EXPENSE..............................
INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--CORPS 250 250
EXPENSE..............................
SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT ............... 875
& DEMONSTRATION......................
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL FOR NATIONAL PROGRAMS.. 105,316 222,650
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE.................. ............... -115,370
---------------------------------
TOTAL........................... 1,402,000 2,004,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ITEMS REQUESTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION IN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.
Tuscaloosa, Alabama.--The Committee recommends $7,500,000
for the relocation project at Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Akutan Harbor, Alaska.--The Committee recommendation
includes $3,000,000 to continue construction of this project.
Alaska Coastal Erosion, Alaska.--The Committee
recommendation provides $4,500,000 for Alaska Coastal Erosion.
The following communities are eligible recipients of these
funds: Kivalina, Newtok, Shishmaref, Koyukuk, Barrow, Kaktovik,
Point Hope, Unalakleet, and Bethel.
Nogales Wash, Arizona.--The Committee recommends $3,000,000
for continuation of this flood control project.
Red River Below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma
and Texas.--The Committee recommends $2,500,000 to continue
levee rehabilitation work in Arkansas and Louisiana to protect
the 1.7 million acre flood plain from crop damage; loss of
livestock; damage to levees, railroads, highways, industries,
and other river and urban developments.
Red River Emergency Bank Protection, Arkansas and
Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $4,000,000 for protection
of critical infrastructure and land along the Red River below
Index, Arkansas. The project plan provides for revetment,
dikes, or cutoffs that can be accomplished in advance of
developing the design for the entire project.
American River Watershed (Folsom Dam Miniraise),
California.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000. Within the
funds recommended, $1,000,000 is for the replacement bridge.
Mid Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, California.---The
Committee recommendation includes $1,500,000 reconstruction of
this flood control project. The project includes levee
reconstruction through installing landside berms with toe
drains, ditch relocation, embankment modification, slurry cut-
off walls, and developing land for fish and wildlife
mitigation.
Oakland Harbor, California.--The Committee recommends
$24,000,000 to continue construction of this project. The
reduction made to this project should not be viewed as any
diminution of support for this project, rather an attempt to
balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide program among the
various missions of the Corps.
Santa Ana River, California.--The Committee recommends
$14,000,000 to continue construction of this flood control
project.
West Sacramento, California.--The Committee recommendation
includes $2,000,000 for a general reevaluation of the flood
control project and other project needs.
Delaware Coast Protection, Delaware.--The Committee
recommendation includes $350,000 to reimburse the state for the
Federal share of the annual operation and maintenance of the
sand bypass facilities.
Everglades and South Florida Ecosystem Restoration,
Florida.--The Committee has chosen to display the various,
separately authorized components of the project in the table in
addition to a single line item as was proposed in the budget.
The Committee believes that it is prudent to maintain
visibility of the various project elements in the budget
process. The reduction made under this heading should not be
viewed as any diminution of support for this project, rather an
attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide
program among the various missions of the Corps.
The Committee has provided no funding for the Modified
Waters Delivery Plan as proposed in the budget. The Committee
has chosen to fund this project in the Department of the
Interior and related agencies bill. The Committee directs the
administration to include the Modified Waters Delivery Plan
funding in the Interior budget in future budget submissions.
Central and South Florida, Florida.--Within the funds
recommended, the Corps shall continue work on the Upper St.
Johns River project.
Florida Keys Water Quality Improvements, Florida.--The
Committee recommendation includes $2,200,000 for continued
implementation of this project. The Committee urges the
administration to budget for this project due to the
interrelationship of this work to the Everglades Restoration
project, Biscayne Bay and southern Florida's nearshore waters.
Jacksonville Harbor, Florida.--The Committee has
recommended $3,500,000 to continue work on the channel
deepening project as well as for a second general reevaluation
report.
Tampa Harbor, Florida.--$500,000 is provided for
preconstruction engineering and design of navigation
improvements and channel deepening.
Atlanta, Georgia.--The Committee recommendation includes
$2,000,000 to continue this project.
Rural Idaho Environmental Infrastructure, Idaho.--The
Committee recommends $4,000,000 for this project. Within the
funds provided the Corps should give consideration to projects
at Aamon (Eastern Idaho Regional Project), Bellevue, Buhl,
Burley, Greenleaf, Hazelton, Lava Hot Springs, Pocatello,
Rexburg, Rigby, Rupert, Sandpoint, Shelley (Eastern Idaho
Regional Project), Soda Springs, St. Anthony, Twin Falls (Auger
Hills), and Wendell. Other communities that meet the program
criteria should be considered as funding allows.
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Illinois.--The Committee
has recommended $6,250,000 for construction on aquatic nuisance
species Barriers I and II.
McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, Illinois.--The Committee
recommends $34,000,000 for continued construction of this
project.
Olmsted Locks and Dam, Ohio River, Illinois and Kentucky.--
The Committee recommends $114,000,000 to continue construction
of this project. None of the funds provided for the Olmsted
Locks and Dam Project or any other construction funds are to be
used to reimburse the Claims and Judgment Fund.
Indiana Harbor (Confined Disposal Facility), Indiana.--The
Committee has retained funding for this project in the
Construction, General account rather than moving it to the
Operations and Maintenance account as proposed in the budget.
Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Iowa.--The Committee
recommendation includes $3,000,000 to complete preconstruction
engineering and design and initiate construction of this flood
control project. The plan includes reconstructing 13,600 feet
of levees and associated facilities to provide improved flood
protection to the Birdland Park and Central Place neighborhoods
and modifications to 19 closure structures in the existing
downtown Des Moines Federal levee system.
Missouri Fish and Wildlife Recovery, Iowa, Kansas,
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.--
The Committee recommends $70,000,000 for this project. Within
the recommended funds, $15,000,000 is to be used for
modifications to the Intake Dam to provide additional habitat
for the pallid sturgeon. To ensure that independent science
guides Missouri River Recovery and its applications of adaptive
Management and to ensure that the success of the recovery
efforts are adequately measured and money wisely spent, the
Committee directs that funds provided through Missouri River
Recovery to the U.S. Geological Survey for science and
monitoring should not be reduced below fiscal year 2007 levels.
Turkey Creek, Kansas and Missouri.--The Committee
recommendation includes $10,000,000 to continue construction of
this project.
Kentucky Lock and Dam, Tennessee River, Kentucky.--The
Committee recommends $22,330,000 for continuation of the
highway and railroad bridges superstructure contract. Funding
deficits in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund prohibit the
Committee from providing additional funds for the upstream lock
excavation contract. The Committee recognizes that this is a
critical path contract for the overall schedule. However, until
the revenue stream for the Inland Waterway Trust Fund is
enhanced, the Committee actions will be limited by available
Trust Fund revenues.
Markland Locks and Dam, Kentucky and Illinois.--The
Committee has provided $10,600,000 for construction on this
major rehabilitation requested by the administration. The
Committee has provided these funds here rather than in O&M as
proposed in the budget request.
J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Louisiana.--The Committee has
recommended $8,500,000 for navigation channel refinement
features, land purchases and development for mitigation of
project impacts, and construction of project recreation and
appurtenant features.
Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.--The Committee has
recommended $2,500,000 to continue efforts to provide 100-year
flood protection for this project. Surveys show the levee grade
is deficient by 12-18 inches.
Louisiana Hurricane Protection System.--It is the
Committee's understanding that the Corps has sufficient legal
authority to afford credit for the lands, easements, rights-of-
way, relocations, and disposal areas provided by the non-
Federal sponsor for the Lake Ponchartrain and Vicinity, West
Bank and Vicinity, and Southeast Louisiana projects that the
Corps determines are necessary for such projects.
Chesapeake Bay Environmental Program, Maryland,
Pennsylvania and Virginia.--The Committee has recommended
$2,500,000 for continuation of this project. Within the funds
recommended, $328,000 is included to complete the environmental
studies concerning non-native oysters.
Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, Maryland and Virginia.--The
Committee recommends $2,000,000 to continue oyster recovery
efforts.
Fort Peck Dam and Lake, Montana.--The Committee
recommendation includes $1,500,000 for continuation of the
disposition of Fort Peck cabins.
Rural Montana, Montana.--The Committee recommends
$5,000,000 for this project. Within the funds provided the
Corps should give consideration to the following projects:
County Water District of Billings Heights, Phase II Upgrade;
Seeley Lake Water System Upgrade; Gildford Wastewater System
Improvements; Daly Ditches Water; City of Shelby, Wastewater
System Improvements; Muddy Cluster Water Line; Manhattan Water
Project; Ten Mile Estates/Pleasant Valley Wastewater
Improvements; Town of Stevensville, Water Improvement Project;
Eureka Water Expansion; City of Troy, Water Project Phase II;
Fort Belknap Water Treatment Plant; Crow Agency Wastewater
Collection System Improvement Project; Columbia Falls
Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements; City of Hamilton,
Wastewater Facility Critical Upgrades; Bigfork County Water and
Sewer District Wastewater Treatment Facilities Improvements;
Bozeman Water Reclamation Facility Reconstruction; City of
Helena, Missouri River Water Treatment Plant Reconstruction;
City of Butte, Big Hole Drinking Water Supply Diversion Dam
Replacement; City of Billings, Water Treatment Plant
Improvements; Greater Woods Bay Wastewater Collection System;
Homestead Acres Water and Sewer Well Acquisition; Manhattan
Water improvements; Great Falls Upper/Lower River Road Water
and Sewer District Improvements; Judith Gap Wastewater
Improvements; Loma County Water Improvement Project; and Carter
Water Improvement Project, Phase II.
Sand Creek, Nebraska.--The Committee recommends $2,400,000
to complete construction of this project.
Rural Nevada, Nevada.--The Committee recommendation
provides $18,000,000 for this project. Within the funds
provided the Corps should give consideration to projects at
North Lemmon Valley; Spanish Springs Valley Phase II; Huffaker
Hills Water Conservation; Lawton-Verdi; Boulder City; Lyon
County; Gerlach; Searchlight; Incline Village; Esmeralda
County; Cold Springs; Fallon; Goldfield; Churchill County; West
Wendover; Yearington; Virgin Valley Water District; Lovelock;
Truckee Meadows Water Authority; McGill-Ruth Consolidated Sewer
and Water District; Carlin; Moapa; Indian Springs; Eldorado
Valley; Ely and Carson City. Other communities that meet the
program criteria should be considered as funding allows.
Raritan River Basin, Green Brook Sub-basin, New Jersey.--
The Committee recommends $10,000,000 to continue construction
of this project. The Committee notes that this area has been
subject to frequent flooding with the latest flood occurring in
2007. The Committee urges the Corps to utilize available funds
to expedite completion of this project.
Barnegat Inlet to Little Egg Harbor, New Jersey.--The
Committee recommends $11,700,000 for this shore protection
project. Funds should be utilized for continuation of the beach
fill project.
Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey.--The Committee
recommends $2,000,000 to continue construction of this project.
Acequias Irrigation System, New Mexico.--The Committee
recommends $2,400,000 to continue restoration of these historic
irrigation distribution systems.
Middle Rio Grande Restoration, New Mexico.--The Committee
recommendation includes $24,016,000 to continue environmental
restoration efforts along the Rio Grande River within
Bernalillo County.
Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota.--The original health care
facility for the Three Affiliated Tribes was permanently
inundated due to the impoundment of Lake Sakakawea. A
replacement healthcare facility was promised but never
constructed. The Committee recommendation includes $17,048,000
for construction of the replacement health care facility. The
Corps should work closely with the Indian Health Service and
the Three Affiliated Tribes on the design and construction of
this facility. The Committee suggests that the Corps utilize
the expertise in their military programs office for this
project.
North Dakota [EI], North Dakota.--The Committee has
recommended $10,000,000 for this program. $1,600,000 is for
work related to the replacement of the Devils Lake Water supply
pipeline and $8,400,000 is for the Parshall water project.
Locks and Dams 2, 3, and 4, Monongahela River,
Pennsylvania.--The Committee recommendation includes
$19,050,000 to continue construction of this project. The
reduction made to this project is a result of a continuing
contract that the Corps chose not to award in fiscal year 2008
due to insufficient funds within the Inland Waterway Trust
Fund. Not awarding the contract in fiscal year 2008, obviated
the need for follow-on funding in fiscal year 2009 thus
lowering the amount needed for this project in fiscal year
2009.
Presque Isle, Pennsylvania.--The Committee recommends
$1,000,000 to continue this project.
Big Sioux River, South Dakota.--The Committee recommends
$4,000,000 to continue construction of this project.
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux, South
Dakota.--The Committee notes that title IV of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999, Public Law 106-53 as
amended, authorizes funding to pay administrative expenses,
implementation of terrestrial wildlife restoration plans,
activities associated with land transferred or to be
transferred, and annual expenses for operating recreational
areas. The Committee recommends $4,000,000 for this effort.
Within the funds recommended, the Committee directs that not
more than $1,000,000 shall be provided for administrative
expenses, and that the Corps is to distribute the remaining
funds as directed by title IV to the State of South Dakota, the
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe.
Chickamauga Lock, Tennessee.--The Committee recommends
$42,000,000 to continue construction of this project.
Central City, Fort Worth, Upper Trinity River Basin,
Texas.--The Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for the
Central City, Fort Worth, Texas, project.
Red River Basin Chloride Control, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas
and Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $1,500,000 to continue
construction.
San Antonio Channel Improvement, Texas.--The Committee
recommendation includes $10,000,000 to continue this flood
control project.
Sims Bayou, Houston, Texas.--The Committee recommendation
includes $21,465,000 for this project. The reduction made to
this project should not be viewed as any diminution of support
for this project, rather an attempt to balance out the Corps of
Engineers nationwide program among the various missions of the
Corps.
Rural Utah, [EI], Utah.--The Committee recommendation
includes $12,000,000 to continue construction of eligible
projects.
Burlington Harbor, Vermont.--The Committee recommends
$500,000 to continue work on removal of oil bollards in the
harbor.
Lake Champlain Watershed Initiative.--The Committee
recommendation includes $2,000,000 for continuation of this
project.
Columbia River Fish Mitigation, Washington, Oregon, and
Idaho.--The Committee has chosen not to follow the budget
proposal to include this work within the various O&M items in
the system. The Committee believes that it is prudent to
maintain visibility of the costs of environmental compliance
activities for this project and have included funding in this
account in this line item. $92,000,000 is recommended for this
project.
Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Washington and Oregon.--The
Committee recommends no funding for this new start recommended
by the administration in the O&M account. The Committee
believes it to be imprudent to initiate the major
rehabilitation report that would be cost shared in the Inland
Waterway Trust Fund when construction work has to be curtailed
due to the funding shortfalls in the Inland Harbor Trust Fund.
The Committee believes this project should not be initiated
until the revenues have been enhanced for the Inland Waterway
Trust Fund.
Mud Mountain, Washington.--The Corps has recommended
$1,000,000 for fish passage at this project.
Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland
River, West Virginia, Kentucky and Virginia.--The Committee
recommends $16,500,000 for the continuation of the project.
Within the funds recommended, the Committee recommendation
includes $8,000,000 for the Buchanan County, Dickenson County,
and Grundy, Virginia elements. Further, the recommendation
includes $8,500,000 for Kermit, Lower Mingo County, McDowell
County, Upper Mingo and Wayne County, West Virginia.
Aquatic Plant Control Program.--The Committee
recommendation includes $4,550,000 for this program. Funds
above the budget request are included for cost-shared programs
for Lake Gaston, North Carolina; Lake Champlain, Vermont; and
Lake Chautauqua, New York.
Actions for Change to Improve Construction.--The Committee
did not recommend funding for this item. The Committee believes
that the activities proposed in the budget request for this
line item should be incorporated into the various funded
construction activities that the Corps has underway.
Dredged Material Disposal Facilities Program.--The
Committee has retained this program in the Construction,
General account rather than the Operations and Maintenance
account as proposed by the budget.
Shore Line Erosion Control Development and Demonstration
Program.--The Committee has recommended $875,000 to be used
along with prior year funds for an innovative approach to storm
damage reduction at Sacred Falls Beach Park, Hawaii, by
restoring and maintaining a pocket beach with an innovative
sediment retaining structure.
Ability to Pay.--Section 103(m) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 Public Law 99-662, as amended, requires
that all project cooperation agreements for flood damage
reduction projects, to which non-Federal cost sharing applies,
will be subject to the ability of non-Federal sponsors to pay
their shares. Congress included this section in the landmark
1986 act to ensure that as many communities as possible would
qualify for Federal flood damage reduction projects, based more
on needs and less on financial capabilities. The Secretary
published eligibility criteria in 33 CFR 241, which requires a
non-Federal sponsor to meet an ability-to-pay test. However,
the Committee believes that the Secretary's test is too
restrictive and operates to exclude most communities from
qualifying for relief under the ability-to-pay provision. For
example, 33 CFR 241.4(f) specifies that the test should be
structured so that reductions in the level of cost sharing will
be granted in ``only a limited number of cases of severe
economic hardship,'' and should depend not only on the economic
circumstances within a project area, but also on the conditions
of the State in which the project area is located.
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM
When Congress authorized the initial Continuing Authorities
in the 1940s and 1950s, they were envisioned to provide a small
pool of money available to the Corps of Engineers to solve very
small localized problems without being encumbered by the longer
study and project authorization process. As more programs were
added to the Continuing Authorities Program [CAP] they became
increasingly popular with congressional Members and the public.
More and more congressionally directed projects began to appear
in the annual appropriations bills. At first these
congressionally directed projects were added to the base
program. As more and more of these congressionally directed
projects came into the program it became difficult for these
congressionally directed projects to be added to the base, and
as such, the base program began to shrink. Congressionally
directed projects now dominate all sections of the CAP Program.
Congressionally directed projects have proliferated to such an
extent that several of the sections are over-subscribed.
The table below shows the Federal obligations, the
allocations through fiscal year 2008, the balance to complete,
and the annual statutory limit for each section of the program.
With roughly a $1,000,000,000 backlog and appropriations
averaging $120,000,000, depending on the section of the program
it could be from two to ten years before all of the current
projects in the program are completed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocations Planned fiscal
CAP section Federal through fiscal year 2008 Balance to Statutory limit
obligation year 2008 allocations complete
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14............................................................ $69,548,012 $38,328,057 $9,707,357 $21,512,598 $15,000
103........................................................... 48,386,819 15,522,875 4,451,555 28,322,389 30,000
107........................................................... 118,598,140 38,181,184 7,232,400 73,184,556 35,000
111........................................................... 50,283,000 3,574,645 1,919,000 44,789,355 (\1\)
204........................................................... 35,317,018 7,398,318 1,373,000 26,545,700 15,000
205........................................................... 548,772,450 162,448,027 42,370,804 343,953,619 55,000
206........................................................... 457,038,102 120,987,115 29,149,778 306,901,210 50,000
208........................................................... 1,349,900 713,899 ................ 636,001 7,500
1135.......................................................... 267,193,752 117,611,141 29,174,000 120,408,611 40,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals.................................................. 1,596,487,193 504,765,261 125,467,894 966,254,038 ................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Not Applicable
The budget justifications for the CAP program do not
provide much useful information as to how the administration
developed its program for fiscal year 2009. There is a dollar
value associated with each section and a listing of projects in
priority order that corresponds to the amount. However, the
Committee has no way of knowing whether the amount shown is
adequate. The Corps is directed to provide more information to
justify the amount shown on the justification sheets for fiscal
year 2010.
Starting in fiscal year 2008 the Committee no longer
provided any congressional earmarks for the section 14,
Emergency Bank Stabilization authority. The Committee has not
provided either the administration's earmark requests for this
section or requests by Members for fiscal year 2009. By
definition these are projects that are estimated to fail within
9-12 months. As an emergency situation the Chief of Engineers
should have the responsibility for determining how these funds
are expended in the most efficient and effective manner. Budget
justifications for this section should display the anticipated
projects and associated costs to be undertaken in the budget
year as well as the anticipated resources necessary to address
emergencies that arise in the budget year.
CAP projects and studies are listed in the Construction,
General table immediately preceding this section. This listing
includes the priority projects listed in the President's budget
request as well as those that were requested by Members. With
one exception, the Committee has not provided dollar amounts
for the named projects in the report. This lack of specificity
in project amounts is intended to give the Chief of Engineers
flexibility within the various sections of the CAP program in
order to address the backlog. The Committee has repeated the
guidance below from the fiscal year 2008 statement of the
managers that accompanied Public Law 110-161 detailing how the
Corps should prioritize work in the CAP program.
Priorities for Design and Implementation [D&I] Phase:
1. D&I work for continuing projects that have executed
PCAs.
2. D&I funding for projects approved by Corps Headquarters
to execute a PCA.
3. D&I work which does not require executed agreements (for
example continuing or pre-PCA design) for ongoing projects.
4. D&I funding for projects with approved Feasibility
Reports moving into D&I.
Priorities for Feasibility Phase:
1. Feasibility phase funding for projects with executed
FCSAs.
2. Feasibility phase funding for projects approved by Corps
Headquarters to execute a FCSA.
3. Feasibility phase work which does not require a FCSA for
ongoing projects.
4. Feasibility phase funding for initiations or restarts.
Within the last-funded priority level within the D&I and
Feasibility phases, if the projects qualifying for funding
exceed the available funding, funds shall be allocated based on
project outputs and the non-Federal sponsor's ability to meet
local obligations.
Remaining funds, if any, may be allocated to additional
projects in accordance with the aforementioned priorities,
except that remaining funds for section 14 projects shall be
allocated to the most urgently needed projects.
The Committee is concerned that if the Corps adhered
strictly to the priorities above, that all funding would be
exhausted for construction. Therefore, in order to provide a
mix of studies, design and construction within each CAP section
the Committee directs that funding be generally divided 80/20
between the D&I phase and the Feasibility phase within each
authority.
The Chief of Engineers should provide a report to the House
and Senate Appropriations Committees within 30 days of
enactment of this bill detailing how funds will be distributed
to the individual items in the various CAP sections for the
fiscal year. The Chief should also provide an annual report at
the end of each fiscal year detailing the progress made on the
backlog of projects. The report should include the completions
and terminations as well as progress of ongoing work.
Even though the Committee is providing a listing of
projects that are of interest, the Corps should develop the
program based on all of the projects in each section whether
named in this report or not. Priorities should be based on the
factors outlined above. The Corps is directed not to initiate
any new continuing authorities projects in sections 205, 206 or
section 1135 without explicit congressional direction. New
projects may be initiated in the remaining sections after an
assessment is made that such projects can be funded over time
based on historical averages of the appropriation for that
section and approval by the House and Senate Committees on
Appropriation.
FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ARKANSAS, ILLINOIS,
KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, AND TENNESSEE
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $387,402,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 240,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 365,000,000
This appropriation funds planning, construction, and
operation and maintenance activities associated with water
resource projects located in the lower Mississippi River Valley
from Cape Girardeau, Missouri to the Gulf of Mexico. The
Committee wishes to reiterate that MR&T project is a good model
for the Corps to examine for moving towards a watershed
approach.
The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are
shown on the following table:
MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year Fiscal year
Project title 2009 budget 2009
request recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IINVESTIGATIONS
BAYOU METO BASIN, AR.................... .............. 43
SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR.................. .............. 400
ALEXANDRIA TO THE GULF, LA.............. 790 790
MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA................ .............. 6,000
SPRING BAYOU, LA........................ .............. 300
COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA 125 130
LAKE, MS...............................
QUIVER RIVER, MS........................ .............. 250
MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MGMT 34 34
STUDY, TN..............................
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA...... 400 1,430
CONSTRUCTION
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, .............. 50,200
MO & TN................................
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, DIKES, AR, IL, KY, 12,134 ..............
LA, MS, MO & TN........................
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, REVETMENT 33,089 ..............
OPERATIONS, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN
GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR................ .............. 9,000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, 20,000 63,823
LA, MS, MO & TN........................
ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR & .............. 5,700
MO.....................................
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA.. 2,025 2,025
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA................... 6,300 15,500
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............ 2,259 3,933
YAZOO BASIN--BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS.... .............. 2,275
YAZOO BASIN--DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, .............. 18,000
MS.....................................
YAZOO BASIN--MAIN STEM, MS.............. .............. 25
YAZOO BASIN--REFORMULATION UNIT, MS..... .............. 2,800
YAZOO BASIN--UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS... .............. 14,000
YAZOO BASIN, BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU. .............. 50
YAZOO BASIN--YAZOO BACKWATER, MS........ .............. 5,000
ST. JOHNS BAYOU AND NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, .............. 200
MO.....................................
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, 65,211 70,000
MO & TN................................
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR...... 128 128
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR....... 249 249
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR.... 256 256
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR.... 161 161
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, 15,873 16,368
LA, MS, MO & TN........................
ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.............. 4,445 8,200
TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, 1,880 1,880
AR & LA................................
WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR............... 1,039 1,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL....... 135 135
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY....... 93 93
HICKMAN/MAGNOLIA BLUFF, KY.............. .............. 60
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA.. 2,117 2,117
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA................... 8,619 8,619
BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA..... 162 162
BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA...... 42 42
BONNET CARRE, LA........................ 2,346 2,346
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA....... 1,727 1,927
LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA.. 53 53
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............ 578 578
OLD RIVER, LA........................... 13,882 13,882
TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA... 2,501 2,501
GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS................... 436 436
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS....... 101 101
VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS.................... 424 424
YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS......... 6,228 6,673
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS.... 171 1,500
YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS.............. 6,388 7,417
YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS.............. 1,650 1,650
YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS........... 6,201 7,166
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS.............. 1,128 2,237
YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS............ 6,971 8,916
YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS............ 694 925
YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX 272 285
CHAN, MS...............................
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS... 393 442
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS............. 634 534
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO....... 185 185
WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO..................... 4,567 4,567
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN....... 81 81
MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN....... 3,283 3,283
MAPPING................................. 1,488 1,488
ANTICIPATED REDUCTION FOR SAVINGS AND .............. (15,975)
SLIPPAGE...............................
ADJUSTMENTS............................. 52 ..............
-------------------------------
TOTAL............................. 240,000 365,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Investigations
Morganza to the Gulf, Louisiana.--The Committee has
recommended $6,000,000 to continue Preconstruction Engineering
and Design for this project. The Committee has included
legislative language which allows the local interest to
construct the Houma Navigation Canal Lock with non-Federal
funds. This shall not be considered initiation of the Federal
project. The Committee is aware that substantial environmental
analysis has been conducted on the Houma Navigation Canal Lock
as well as the other portions of the Morganza alignment.
Furthermore, the Committee is aware of significant engineering
work that is underway using both Federal and non-Federal
funding. Accordingly, the Committee urges the Corps to resolve
any permitting issues that may develop as a result of non-
Federal spending, as expeditiously as possible. Finally, the
Committee remains sensitive to the critical need for hurricane
and flood protection in the Terrebonne and Lafourche Parish
area of Louisiana, and is providing this flexibility to allow
the local sponsors to move forward on components while further
reviews are taking place on the larger project.
Quiver River, Mississippi.--The Committee has recommended
$250,000 to initiate studies to identify options for improving
water quality while addressing other needs
Collection and Study of Basic Data.--The Committee
recommends an additional $1,000,000 for Lidar mapping in the
Yazoo River Basin.
Construction
Grand Prairie, Arkansas.--The Committee has recommended
$9,000,000 for continued construction of the project.
Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.--Additional
funds above the budget request could be used for the following
activities: relief wells (parcel 1) at Delta, Mississippi;
relief wells at Wilson, Arkansas; relief wells at Barfield,
Arkansas; relief wells at Tunica, Mississippi; relief wells
(parcel 2) at Delta, Mississippi; engineering and design work
for levee construction work at three sites in Missouri;
engineering and design work for levee construction work at two
sites in Arkansas; engineering and design for construction work
near Cairo, Illinois; acquisition of mitigation lands; to
continue construction on the MRL features of the St. Johns
Bayou-New Madrid Floodway; fund Magna Vista-Brunswick,
Mississippi, Item 468-L; Bayou Vidal-Elkridge, Louisiana, Item
419-R; Bayou Vidal-Elkridge, Louisiana, Item 416-R; Magna
Vista-Brunswick, Mississippi, Item 465-L; advance completion of
levee enlargement; concrete slope paving contract; slope
stability contract; and complete the LMRMRIS.
Yazoo Basin, Backwater Pumping Plant, Mississippi.--The
Committee has recommended $5,000,000 to fully fund pump and
motor contracts and initiate purchase of conservation
easements. Funds are also provided for the center associated
with the Theodore Roosevelt National Wildlife Refuge.
Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower Basin, Mississippi.--The
Committee recognizes the need for control of bank erosion along
the Big Sunflower River and has recommended $2,275,000 for the
continued construction of the Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River
Project. $1,500,000 is recommended to continue bank
stabilization erosion repairs at selected sites in the
Sunflower Basin.
Yazoo Basin, Delta Headwaters Project, Mississippi.--The
Committee has recommended $18,000,000 to continue construction
of this erosion protection projects in the Yazoo Basin.
Yazoo Basin, Upper Yazoo Project, Mississippi.--The
Committee has recommended $14,000,000 to continue construction
of this flood control project. The Committee regrets that
budgetary constraints do not allow funding at a more optimal
level. Additional non-defense discretionary budgetary resources
will be needed in future years if the project is to proceed at
or near the Corps' schedule.
Maintenance
Hickman/Magnolia Bluff, Kentucky.--The Committee recommends
$60,000 to prepare plans and specifications and to repair
damage to the maintenance access road and a concrete-lined
drainage ditch caused by a September 2006 flood.
Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.--Funds provided
above the budget request are to provide gravel surfacing to
selected locations along roads on top of levees in Arkansas,
Mississippi, and Louisiana to ensure all weather access for
flood fights and for other backlog maintenance.
Mississippi Lakes.--The Committee has recommended
additional funding to address the maintenance backlog at
Arkabutla, Sardis, Enid and Grenada Lakes in Mississippi.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, GENERAL
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $2,243,637,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 2,475,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,220,000,000
This appropriation funds operation, maintenance, and
related activities at the water resources projects that the
Corps operates and maintains. Work to be accomplished consists
of dredging, repair, and operation of structures and other
facilities, as authorized in the various River and Harbor,
Flood Control, and Water Resources Development Acts. Related
activities include aquatic plant control, monitoring of
completed projects where appropriate, removal of sunken
vessels, and the collection of domestic waterborne commerce
statistics.
The Committee continues to believe that it is essential to
provide adequate resources and attention to operation and
maintenance requirements in order to protect the large Federal
investment. In order to cope with the current fiscal situation,
the Corps has had to defer or delay scheduled maintenance
activities.
The O&M budget request appears to have been increased by
nearly $231,363,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted amount.
However this is very misleading. Shifting of projects from the
CG account to the O&M account totals $264,775,000. Once these
projects are shifted back to CG, that leaves a decrease of
$33,412,000 when compared to fiscal year 2008. The Committee
notes that the Corps maintenance backlog is more than
$1,000,000,000 and increases by about $100,000,000 annually as
the inventory of projects ages.
The Committee has chosen to display the budget request as
the discrete projects that are the tradition as opposed to the
regional budget proposed by the administration. Also the
Committee has chosen to migrate the projects that the
administration proposed in O&M back to their traditional
location in the CG account. This makes the actual budget
request for O&M $2,210,225,000 rather than $2,475,000,000 as
presented in the budget. A list of these migrated projects is
displayed under the CG heading earlier in this report.
Maintenance of our aging water infrastructure inventory
gets more expensive every year, however, it is consistently
underfunded. If this trend continues, the Corps will not be
able to maintain expected levels of service at all of its
projects. The Committee has maintained its tradition of
supporting what the budget request terms as ``low use harbors
and waterways''. The Committee recognizes the importance of
these facilities and will continue to provide funding for them.
Unfortunately due to budget constraints the Committee was not
able to provide nearly enough funding as is needed for our
aging infrastructure.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project title Budget estimate recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALABAMA
ALABAMA--COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER 375 375
STUDY, AL............................
ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL............... 15,672 15,672
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL 22,191 22,191
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL........ 5,230 5,230
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AL..... 60 60
MOBILE HARBOR, AL..................... 21,562 21,562
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL......... 100 100
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AL... 94 94
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE 2,350 2,350
MITIGATION, AL.......................
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS. 22,009 22,009
WALTER F GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA. 8,417 8,417
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, AL. 120 120
ALASKA
ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK.................. 17,601 17,601
CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK................. 2,225 2,225
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK................. 840 840
HOMER HARBOR, AK...................... 620 620
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK..... 1,058 1,058
LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, AK............... ............... 500
NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK.................. 350 350
NOME HARBOR, AK....................... 780 780
PETERSBERG NORTH HARBOR PROJECT, AK... ............... 500
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK......... 550 550
ARIZONA
ALAMO LAKE, AZ........................ 1,585 1,585
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ..... 98 98
PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ.................. 1,206 1,206
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ... 39 39
WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ................. 171 171
ARKANSAS
BEAVER LAKE, AR....................... 5,270 5,270
BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR..... 8,384 8,384
BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR................ 1,427 1,427
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR.................. 7,367 7,367
DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM, AR........... 8,491 8,491
DEGRAY LAKE, AR....................... 6,317 6,317
DEQUEEN LAKE, AR...................... 1,286 1,286
DIERKS LAKE, AR....................... 1,354 1,354
GILLHAM LAKE, AR...................... 1,156 1,156
GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR................. 6,861 6,861
HELENA HARBOR, AR..................... 90 400
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR..... 508 508
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 28,395 28,395
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR................
MILLWOOD LAKE, AR..................... 2,074 2,074
NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR......... 4,591 4,591
NIMROD LAKE, AR....................... 1,609 1,609
NORFORK LAKE, AR...................... 3,920 3,920
OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR.................... 14 500
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA.... 8,509 8,509
OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM, AR.... 5,287 5,287
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR......... 8 8
WHITE RIVER, AR....................... 52 52
YELLOW BEND PORT, AR.................. 3 160
CALIFORNIA
BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA.................. 1,954 1,954
BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA..... 1,820 1,820
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA............ 5,360 5,360
COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA. 3,384 3,384
DANA POINT HARBOR, CA................. ............... 700
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE AND 5,067 5,067
CHANNEL, CA..........................
FARMINGTON DAM, CA.................... 443 443
HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA.......... 1,786 1,786
HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA........... 5,144 5,144
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA..... 3,822 3,822
ISABELLA LAKE, CA..................... 1,404 1,404
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA.. 3,996 3,996
MARINA DEL REY, CA.................... 2,499 2,499
MARTIS CREEK LAKE, CA & NV............ 737 737
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA............. 239 239
MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA.................. 285 285
MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA.................. 1,630 1,630
NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA.................... 2,115 2,115
NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, 1,730 1,730
CA...................................
NOYO HARBOR, CA....................... ............... 750
OAKLAND HARBOR, CA.................... 7,445 7,445
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA.................. 1,620 1,620
PINE FLAT LAKE, CA.................... 2,854 2,854
PINOLE SHOAL MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA..... ............... 500
PORT HUENEME, CA...................... 4,029 4,029
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA......... 2,422 2,422
RICHMOND HARBOR, CA................... 6,950 6,950
SACRAMENTO RIVER (30-FOOT PROJECT), CA 5,582 5,582
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES 1,566 1,566
(DEBRIS CONTROL), CA.................
SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT 175 175
CHANNEL, CA..........................
SAN FRANCISCO BAY, DELTA MODEL 1,106 1,106
STRUCTURE, CA........................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA 2,805 2,805
(DRIFT REMOVAL)......................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA.............. 2,514 2,514
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, 5,411 5,411
CA...................................
SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, 1,140 1,140
CA...................................
SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA............. 3,148 3,148
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA.............. 2,090 2,090
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA... 1,639 1,639
SUCCESS LAKE, CA...................... 1,791 1,791
SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA................ 2,982 2,982
TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA......... 1,912 1,912
VENTURA HARBOR, CA.................... 3,095 3,095
YUBA RIVER, CA........................ 129 129
COLORADO
BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO................... 332 332
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO.................... 1,176 1,509
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO................. 870 1,203
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO..... 457 457
JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO............. 2,418 2,418
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO... 720 720
TRINIDAD LAKE, CO..................... 956 1,290
CONNECTICUT
BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT................... 416 416
BRIDGEPORT HARBOR DREDGING, CT........ ............... 2,000
COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT.............. 547 547
HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT................ 338 338
HOP BROOK LAKE, CT.................... 919 919
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT..... 316 316
LONG ISLAND SOUND DMMP, CT............ 1,000 1,000
MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT............. 493 493
NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT............. 385 385
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT......... 1,100 1,100
STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT........ 374 374
THOMASTON DAM, CT..................... 615 615
WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT................ 568 568
DELAWARE
DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT 350 ...............
INLET TO LEWES\1\....................
HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE........... ............... 500
INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, SUSSEX ............... 500
COUNTY, DE...........................
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE R TO 14,065 14,065
CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE...................
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO 40 40
DELAWARE BAY, DE.....................
MISPILLION RIVER, DE.................. 30 500
MURDERKILL RIVER, DE.................. 30 30
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE......... 147 147
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE................. 2,750 3,750
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC..... 62 62
POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC 805 805
(DRIFT REMOVAL)......................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC......... 28 28
WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC................. 25 25
FLORIDA
CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL.................. 4,404 4,404
CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL...... 13,234 13,234
ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL....... 25 25
EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM 400 400
RESTORATION, FL......................
FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL................. 2,025 2,025
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL..... 300 300
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE ............... 1,000
R TO ANCLOTE R,......................
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO 325 2,500
MIAMI, FL............................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL............... 6,000 6,000
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE 9,165 9,165
SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA................
MANATEE HARBOR, FL.................... 2,675 2,675
MIAMI RIVER, FL....................... 10,820 10,820
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL............... 4,530 4,530
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL................. 2,385 2,385
PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL................ 55 55
PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL.................. 67 67
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL......... 1,265 1,265
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL......... 4,420 4,420
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL... 30 30
SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM 357 357
RESTORATION, FL......................
TAMPA HARBOR, FL...................... 4,550 4,550
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL. 405 405
GEORGIA
ALLATOONA LAKE, GA.................... 6,016 6,016
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT 3,418 3,418
RIVERS, GA, AL &.....................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA.... 257 1,000
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA.................. 5,545 5,545
BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. 7,946 7,946
CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA.............. 7,703 7,703
HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC................ 12,188 12,188
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 63 63
PROJECTS, GA.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA..... 142 142
J. STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC....... 11,066 11,066
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA......... 162 162
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & 8,386 8,386
SC...................................
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA\1\................ 19,170 13,895
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA...... 183 183
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL...... 7,446 7,446
HAWAII
BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI.............. 200 548
HALEIWA HARBOR, OAHU, HI.............. ............... 1,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI..... 659 659
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI......... 537 537
WAIANAE HARBOR, HI.................... ............... 1,000
IDAHO
ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID.................. 1,539 1,539
DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID........ 2,404 2,404
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID..... 354 334
LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID................... 1,801 1,801
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID... 469 469
ILLINOIS
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL.................... 2,015 2,015
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL..... 44 ...............
CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN..... 4,780 4,780
CARLYLE LAKE, IL...................... 4,155 4,155
CHICAGO RIVER, IL..................... 475 475
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL............. 203 203
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVR PORTION), IL & 38,121 36,287
IN...................................
GRAFTON, IL TO LAGRANGE LOCK & DAM (1,834) ...............
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVS PORTION), IL & ............... 1,834
IN...................................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 65 65
PROJECTS, IL.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL..... 2,298 2,342
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL........ 1,903 1,903
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL........... 860 860
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL.................. 4,761 4,761
LOCK AND DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RVR, IL 2,598 ...............
(MAJOR REHAB)\1\.....................
MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND 63,207 63,207
MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION)............
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL......... 111 111
REND LAKE, IL......................... 4,570 4,570
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 565 565
WATERS, IL...........................
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL................... 1,099 1,099
MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND 20,004 20,004
MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION)............
INDIANA
BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN................... 1,649 1,649
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN............. 160 160
CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN.................. 2,053 2,053
CECIL M HARDEN LAKE, IN............... 1,226 1,226
INDIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL 8,385 ...............
FACILITY, IN\1\......................
INDIANA HARBOR, IN.................... 3,138 3,138
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN..... 635 635
J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN.............. 2,842 2,842
MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN................. 1,051 1,051
MONROE LAKE, IN....................... 1,326 1,326
PATOKA LAKE, IN....................... 1,150 1,150
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN......... 185 185
ROUSH RIVER MAJOR REHAB PROJECT, IN... 300 300
SALAMONIE LAKE, IN.................... 1,226 1,226
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 91 91
WATERS, IN...........................
IOWA
CORALVILLE LAKE, IA................... 2,887 2,887
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA..... 466 ...............
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA..... 717 1,183
LOCK AND DAM 11, MISSISSIPPI RVR, IA 2,750
(MAJOR REHAB)\1\.....................
MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO 166 166
SIOUX CITY, IA.......................
MISSOURI RIVER--RULO TO MOUTH, IA, KS, 5,106 5,106
MO & NE..............................
MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO THE 2,560 2,560
MOUTH, IA, KS, MO & NE...............
MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 85,000 ...............
RECOVERY, IA, KS, MO\1\..............
RATHBUN LAKE, IA...................... 2,214 2,277
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA.... 3,278 3,278
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA.................. 3,908 3,908
KANSAS
CLINTON LAKE, KS...................... 1,975 2,042
COUNCIL GRAVE LAKE, KS................ 1,328 1,328
EL DORADO LAKE, KS.................... 569 569
ELK CITY LAKE, KS..................... 734 734
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS................... 1,284 1,284
HILLSDALE LAKE, KS.................... 722 764
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS..... 177 177
JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS.... 1,042 1,042
KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS.................... 1,330 1,418
MARION LAKE, KS....................... 1,504 1,504
MELVERN LAKE, KS...................... 2,035 2,111
MILFORD LAKE, KS...................... 2,076 2,133
PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS..... 1,048 1,048
PERRY LAKE, KS........................ 2,452 2,516
POMONA LAKE, KS....................... 1,914 1,969
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS... 30 30
TORONTO LAKE, KS...................... 535 535
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS................. 2,060 2,135
WILSON LAKE, KS....................... 1,577 1,977
KENTUCKY
BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY & TN. 10,255 10,255
BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY................. 3,969 5,969
BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY.................. 1,250 1,250
BUCKHORN LAKE, KY..................... 2,433 2,433
CARR CREEK LAKE, KY................... 1,797 1,797
CAVE RUN LAKE, KY..................... 1,098 1,098
DEWEY LAKE, KY........................ 1,768 1,768
ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY...... 25 25
FISHTRAP LAKE, KY..................... 1,830 1,830
GRAYSON LAKE, KY...................... 1,445 1,445
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY........... 2,698 3,698
GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY.................. 4,942 4,942
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY..... 554 554
KENTUCKY RIVER, KY.................... 10 10
LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY................. 1,748 1,748
MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY & IN (MAJOR 10,600 ...............
REHAB) \1\...........................
MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY................. 1,062 1,062
MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY 102 102
NOLIN LAKE, KY........................ 3,337 3,337
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN 39,419 39,419
& OH.................................
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, 4,485 4,485
IN & OH..............................
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY.................. 954 954
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY......... 7 7
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY.................. 2,832 2,832
TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY................. 1,312 1,312
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY... 7,834 7,834
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY................... 1,180 1,180
LOUISIANA
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, 8,993 8,993
BOEUF AND BLACK, L...................
BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA............ 926 926
BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA............ 809 809
BAYOU LACOMBE, LA..................... ............... 450
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP 724 724
WATERWAY, LA.........................
BAYOU PIERRE, LA...................... 18 18
BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA........... 321 321
BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA... 14 14
BAYOU TECHE, LA....................... 209 209
CADDO LAKE, LA........................ 181 181
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA.......... 14,968 14,968
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA.................. 1,848 1,848
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA........ 17,769 17,769
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA............ 662 1,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA..... 1,814 1,814
J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA...... 10,555 10,555
LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA............ 17 440
MADISON PARISH PORT, LA............... 5 85
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA................... 1,969 1,969
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, 3,136 3,136
LA...................................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE 55,325 55,325
GULF OF MEXICO,......................
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA......... 1,500 1,500
TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA.................. ............... 321
TCHEFUNCTE RIVER & BOGUE FALIA, LA.... ............... 400
WALLACE LAKE, LA...................... 200 200
WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA.. 32 500
WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO 239 500
BAYOU DULAC, LA......................
MAINE
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME.......... 1,200 1,200
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME..... 29 29
NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, ME................. ............... 600
PORTLAND HARBOR, ME................... 100 100
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME......... 750 750
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 17 17
WATERS, ME...........................
MARYLAND
ASSATEAGUE, MD\1\..................... 500 ...............
BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50- 16,193 16,193
FOOT), MD............................
BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL).. 338 338
CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV....... 98 98
HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD.... ............... 500
HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD........... ............... 500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD..... 89 89
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV....... 1,713 1,713
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND 450 450
SINEPUXENT BAY, MD...................
PARISH CREEK, MD...................... ............... 500
POPLAR ISLAND, MD\1\.................. 9,185 ...............
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD......... 376 376
RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD.......... ............... 500
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD... 64 64
TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE RIVER, 135 135
MD...................................
WICOMICO RIVER, MD.................... 1,400 1,400
MASSACHUSETTS
BARRE FALLS DAM, MA................... 580 580
BIRCH HILL DAM, MA.................... 574 574
BOSTON HARBOR, MA..................... 6,000 6,000
BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA.................. 515 515
CAPE COD CANAL, MA.................... 11,546 11,546
CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE 291 291
AREA, MA.............................
CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA................. 232 232
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA............... 398 398
HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA................ 503 503
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA..... 381 381
KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA................... 526 526
LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA.................. 489 489
NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET 272 372
HURRICANE BARRIER,...................
NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA.. ............... 250
NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA................ ............... 400
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA......... 1,200 1,200
TULLY LAKE, MA........................ 543 543
WEST HILL DAM, MA..................... 674 674
WESTVILLE LAKE, MA.................... 497 497
MICHIGAN
ALPENA HARBOR, MI..................... ............... ...............
ARCADIA HARBOR, MI.................... ............... ...............
AU SABLE, MI.......................... ............... ...............
BAY PORT HARBOR, MI................... ............... ...............
BIG BAY HARBOR, MI.................... ............... ...............
BLACK RIVER (GOGEBIC), MI............. ............... ...............
CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ...............
CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI........ 156 156
CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI................. 197 197
CLINTON RIVER, MI..................... ............... ...............
DETROIT RIVER, MI..................... 5,327 5,327
FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ...............
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI................ 1,312 1,312
GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI............... ............... ...............
GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI......... ............... ...............
GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MI................ 180 180
HOLLAND HARBOR, MI.................... 588 588
INLAND ROUTE, MI...................... ............... ...............
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI..... 230 230
KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI................. 86 86
LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI............... ............... ...............
LELAND HARBOR, MI..................... ............... ...............
LES CHENEAUX ISLAND CHANNELS, MI...... ............... ...............
LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ...............
LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI................ ............... ...............
LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI.................. 442 442
MANISTEE HARBOR, MI................... ............... ...............
MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI................. ............... ...............
MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ...............
MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ...............
MICHIGAN HARBOR DREDGING, MI.......... ............... 5,000
MONROE HARBOR, MI..................... 1,018 1,018
MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI................... 350 350
NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI................ ............... ...............
ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI.................. 655 655
PENTWATER HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ...............
PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI................... ............... ...............
POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI.............. ............... ...............
PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI................ ............... ...............
PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI............... ............... ...............
PORTAGE HARBOR, MI.................... ............... ...............
PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI............... 312 312
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI......... 276 276
ROUGE RIVER, MI\1\.................... 1,321 1,161
SAGINAW RIVER, MI..................... 3,798 3,798
SAUGATUCK HARBOR, MI.................. ............... ...............
SEBEWAING RIVER, MI................... 75 75
SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI................ ............... ...............
ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI................... 1,791 1,791
ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI................. 595 595
ST. MARYS RIVER, MI................... 18,836 18,836
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 2,444 2,444
WATERS, MI...........................
WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI................. ............... ...............
MINNESOTA
BIGSTONE LAKE--WHETSTONE RIVER, MN & 172 172
SD...................................
DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI....... 4,929 4,929
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN..... 623 623
LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, 431 431
MN...................................
MINNESOTA RIVER, MN................... 200 200
MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND 44,904 44,904
MINNEAPOLIS (MVP PORTION)............
ORWELL LAKE, MN....................... 256 256
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN......... 95 95
RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN................ 84 84
RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF 3,170 3,170
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 323 323
WATERS, MN...........................
TWO HARBORS, MN....................... 300 300
MISSISSIPPI
CLAIRBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS............ 1 60
EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS........ 135 135
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS................... 3,715 10,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS..... 223 223
MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS.............. 30 160
OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS.................... 1,517 1,900
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS................. 4,130 8,000
PEARL RIVER, MS & LA.................. 193 193
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS......... 82 82
ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS................... 11 11
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, MS. 30 30
YAZOO RIVER, MS....................... 26 26
MISSOURI
CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO............. 10 500
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN 6,449 6,449
LAKE, MO.............................
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO................... 2,825 2,825
HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO.. 8,528 8,863
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO..... 1,688 1,688
LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO........... 885 935
LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO.................. 1,057 1,100
MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS 25,359 25,359
(REG WORKS), MO......................
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO................. 152 400
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO (MILE 889)...... ............... 300
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO............... 2,056 2,108
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO......... 14 14
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO... 327 327
SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO................... 1,162 1,203
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSISSIPPI 8 8
RIVER, MO............................
STOCKTON LAKE, MO..................... 3,320 3,828
TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR.............. 6,667 6,667
UNION LAKE, MO........................ 10 10
MONTANA
FT. PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT............. 4,170 4,444
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT..... 54 54
LIBBY DAM, MT......................... 1,712 1,712
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT... 88 88
NEBRASKA
GAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK 5,935 6,518
LAKE, NE & SD........................
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE................ 1,721 1,786
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE..... 508 508
PAPILLION CREEK, NE................... 531 531
SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE........ 702 702
NEVADA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV..... 127 127
PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV.... 204 204
NEW HAMPSHIRE
BLACKWATER DAM, NH.................... 567 567
EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH............. 514 514
FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH................ 619 619
HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH........... 1,081 1,081
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH..... 37 37
OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH.................. 598 598
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH......... 300 300
SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH............... 596 596
NEW JERSEY
ABSECON INLET, NJ..................... ............... 265
BARNEGAT INLET, NJ.................... 225 225
CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, 2,500 ...............
NJ\1\................................
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ................. 243 243
DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ.......... 15 15
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE 18,778 18,778
SEA, NJ, PA & DE.....................
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO 750 750
TRENTON, NJ..........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ..... 253 253
LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY 150 ...............
POINT, NJ\1\.........................
MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ................... 160 160
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ.. 250 250
NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC 300 300
RIVERS, NJ...........................
PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, NJ 254 254
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ......... 1,363 1,363
RARITAN AND SANDY HOOKS BAYS, 40 40
LEONARDO, NJ.........................
RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, 200 200
NJ...................................
RARITAN RIVER, NJ..................... 220 220
SALEM RIVER, NJ....................... 70 70
SHARK RIVER, NJ....................... 775 775
SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ.... 300 300
SHREWSBURY RIVER, MAIN CHANNEL, NJ.... 120 120
NEW MEXICO
ABIQUIU DAM, NM....................... 2,220 2,220
COCHITI LAKE, NM...................... 2,392 2,392
CONCHAS LAKE, NM...................... 1,121 1,121
GALISTEO DAM, NM...................... 423 423
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM..... 811 811
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM.................. 684 684
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES ............... 200
COLLABORATIVE PRO....................
RIO GRANDE BOSQUE REHABILITATION, NM.. ............... 4,000
SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM........... 940 940
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM... 502 502
TWO RIVERS DAM, NM.................... 452 452
UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS 1,201 1,201
MODEL STUDY, NM......................
NEW YORK
ALMOND LAKE, NY....................... 424 424
ARKPORT DAM, NY....................... 225 225
BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA 1,235 1,235
HARBOR, NY...........................
BRONX RIVER, NY....................... 250 250
BUFFALO HARBOR, NY.................... 50 50
BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY................ 220 220
EAST RIVER, NY........................ 500 500
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY............... 4,220 4,220
EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY.................. 473 473
EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY................. 180 180
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, 500 ...............
NY\1\................................
FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY............ 380 380
GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY................... 80 80
HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY.............. 500 500
HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT).............. 1,125 1,125
HUDSON RIVER, NY (O&C)................ 1,525 1,525
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY..... 1,031 1,031
JAMAICA BAY, NY....................... 250 250
JONES INLET, NY....................... 350 350
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY............... 700 700
LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY........... 10 10
LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY. 200 200
MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY.................. 20 20
MORICHES INLET, NY.................... 2,050 2,050
MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY.................. 4,839 4,839
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY.. 6,750 6,750
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY................... 4,000 4,000
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT 6,300 6,300
REMOVAL).............................
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY (PREVENTION OF 950 950
OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSIT..................
NEWTOWN CREEK, NY..................... 220 220
PORTCHESTER HARBOR, NY................ 150 150
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY......... 1,830 1,830
ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY.................. 1,605 1,605
SHINNECOCK INLET, NY.................. 200 200
SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL 839 839
PROJECTS, NY.........................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 551 551
WATERS, NY...........................
WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY................. 250 250
WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY................ 553 553
NORTH CAROLINA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC.... 900 2,000
B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.... 1,633 1,633
BOGUE INLET, NC....................... ............... 400
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC.. 718 718
CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC.............. ............... 600
FALLS LAKE, NC........................ 1,683 1,683
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC..... 250 250
LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC............. ............... 200
MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC........... 4,100 4,100
MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING 365 365
CHANNELS, NC.........................
MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC.............. 5,000 5,000
NEW RIVER INLET, NC................... 800 800
NEW TOPSAIL INLET, NC................. ............... 400
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC......... 675 675
ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC................. 150 300
SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC................ 400 400
W KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC.... 2,977 2,977
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC................. 13,000 13,000
NORTH DAKOTA
BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND................. 153 153
GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND...... 9,435 11,789
HOMME LAKE, ND........................ 151 293
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND..... 360 360
LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND... 1,017 1,742
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND..................... 572 572
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND... 119 119
SOURIS RIVER, ND...................... 280 280
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 24 24
WATER, ND............................
OHIO
ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH................... 1,439 1,439
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH.................. 1,850 1,850
BERLIN LAKE, OH....................... 4,867 4,867
CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH................. 2,149 2,149
CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH.............. 2,520 2,520
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH.................. 6,710 6,710
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH................... 350 350
DEER CREEK LAKE, OH................... 1,359 1,359
DELAWARE LAKE, OH..................... 1,445 1,445
DILLON LAKE, OH....................... 1,454 1,454
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH................... 2,026 2,026
HURON HARBOR, OH...................... 1,530 1,530
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH..... 452 452
LORAIN HARBOR, OH..................... 2,423 2,423
MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH 24 24
MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH 2,023 2,023
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH............... 1,383 1,383
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH............. 8,275 8,275
NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH.. 593 593
OHIO--MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH... 1,089 1,089
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH.................. 1,307 1,307
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH......... 295 295
ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH 35 35
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 223 223
WATERS, OH...........................
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH..................... 4,701 4,701
TOM JENKINS DAM, OH................... 791 791
WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH...... 865 865
WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH............ 1,837 1,837
OKLAHOMA
ARCADIA LAKE, OK...................... 472 472
BIRCH LAKE, OK........................ 648 648
BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK................... 1,903 1,903
CANTON LAKE, OK....................... 1,707 1,707
COPAN LAKE, OK........................ 937 937
EUFAULA LAKE, OK...................... 5,348 5,348
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK.................. 10,218 10,218
FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK.................. 742 742
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK............ 256 256
HEYBURN LAKE, OK...................... 555 555
HUGO LAKE, OK......................... 1,493 1,493
HULAH LAKE, OK........................ 476 476
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK..... 177 177
KAW LAKE, OK.......................... 2,574 2,574
KEYSTONE LAKE, OK..................... 6,073 6,073
MCCLELLAN--KERR ARKANSAS RIVER 5,819 5,819
NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK................
OOLOGAH LAKE, OK...................... 1,923 1,923
OPTIMA LAKE, OK....................... 164 164
PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE 119 119
CHEROKEES, OK........................
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK................... 1,099 1,099
ROBERT S KERR LOCK AND DAM AND 6,599 6,599
RESERVOIR, OK........................
SARDIS LAKE, OK....................... 912 912
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK... 520 520
SKIATOOK LAKE, OK..................... 1,318 1,318
TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK.............. 3,794 3,794
WAURIKA LAKE, OK...................... 1,093 1,093
WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK........ 4,695 4,695
WISTER LAKE, OK....................... 678 678
OREGON
APPLEGATE LAKE, OR.................... 904 904
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR................... 427 427
BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA...... 11,701 9,691
CHETCO RIVER, OR...................... 574 574
COLUMBIA & LWR WILLAMETTE R BLW 24,973 18,052
VANCOUVER, WA & PORTLA...............
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA.. 15,125 15,125
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA 640 640
AND THE DALLES, OR...................
COOS BAY, OR.......................... 4,769 4,769
COQUILLE RIVER, OR.................... 307 307
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR................ 991 991
COUGAR LAKE, OR....................... 1,549 5,380
DEPOE BAY, OR......................... 3 124
DETROIT LAKE, OR...................... 2,064 2,564
DORENA LAKE, OR....................... 831 831
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR................... 918 1,418
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR................... 1,433 1,433
GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR.......... 1,823 2,323
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR.................. 792 1,292
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 33 33
PROJECTS, OR.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR..... 413 413
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA........ 7,049 7,049
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR................ 2,261 2,761
LOST CREEK LAKE, OR................... 3,560 3,560
MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA.......... 5,183 5,183
PORT ORFORD, OR....................... 7 7
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR......... 220 220
ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR......... 587 587
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR... 82 82
SIUSLAW RIVER, OR..................... 583 583
SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR.................. 5 5
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 10,400 10,400
WATERS, WA...........................
TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR............. 35 2,200
UMPQUA RIVER, OR...................... 635 635
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, 210 210
OR...................................
WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR.. 62 62
WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, 3,331 ...............
OR\1\................................
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR................. 610 610
YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR............ 1,482 1,482
YAQUINA RIVER, OR..................... ............... 300
PENNSYLVANIA
ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA................... 6,578 6,578
ALVIN R BUSH DAM, PA.................. 591 591
AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA............. 215 215
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA................... 1,311 1,311
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA................... 2,736 2,736
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA.............. 1,734 1,734
COWANESQUE LAKE, PA................... 1,847 1,847
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA................ 2,530 2,530
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA................. 625 625
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA.... 2,179 2,179
FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA.......... 633 633
FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA.............. 774 774
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND 228 228
RESERVOIR, PA........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA..... 592 592
JOHNSTOWN, PA......................... 2,255 2,255
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA 2,493 2,493
LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA................... 2,880 2,880
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA............... 1,823 1,823
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA................. 12,392 12,392
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV 24,796 24,796
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & 509 509
WV...................................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA......... 70 70
PROMPTON LAKE, PA..................... 505 505
PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA...................... 20 20
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA..................... 3,312 3,312
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA... 46 46
SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA.................. 2,000 3,000
SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA............... 2,366 2,366
STILLWATER LAKE, PA................... 331 331
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 93 93
WATERS, PA...........................
TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA............... 2,213 2,213
TIONESTA LAKE, PA..................... 3,115 3,115
UNION CITY LAKE, PA................... 1,017 1,017
WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA............... 1,033 1,033
YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA.............. 471 471
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD...... 2,908 2,908
PUERTO RICO
ARECIBO HARBOR, PR.................... 100 100
RHODE ISLAND
GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (new ............... 250
Harbor)..............................
BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR, RI............... 360 500
FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, RI....... ............... 500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI..... 43 43
POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REUGE, RI...... 1,250 1,250
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI......... 400 400
PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI ............... 300
WOONSOCKET, RI........................ ............... 300
SOUTH CAROLINA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC.... 724 1,500
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC\1\.............. 12,527 9,947
COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC... 4,685 4,685
FOLLY RIVER, SC\1\.................... 35 ...............
GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC................. 690 690
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC..... 65 65
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC......... 624 624
SOUTH DAKOTA
BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD......... 6,799 6,799
CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER ............... 3,000
BRULE SIOUX, SD......................
COLD BROOK LAKE, SD................... 303 303
COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD........... 223 223
FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, 7,328 7,328
SD...................................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD..... 49 49
LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN................ 403 403
OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND.......... 8,977 9,277
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD... 52 52
TENNESSEE
CENTER HILL LAKE, TN.................. 7,021 7,021
CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN............. 6,829 6,829
CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN. 1,200 1,200
CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN.... 6,386 6,386
DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN.................. 6,262 6,262
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN..... 85 85
J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN. 4,602 4,602
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN.......... 9,845 9,845
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN......... 9 9
TENNESSEE RIVER, TN................... 20,219 20,219
WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN................. 107 107
TEXAS
AQUILLA LAKE, TX...................... 1,354 1,354
ARKANSAS--RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE 1,415 1,415
CONTROL--AREA VI.....................
BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX.......... 1,417 1,417
BARDWELL LAKE, TX..................... 2,162 2,162
BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX.............. 3,122 3,122
BELTON LAKE, TX....................... 3,567 3,567
BENBROOK LAKE, TX..................... 2,302 2,302
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX.............. 3,259 3,259
BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX..... 1,723 1,723
CANYON LAKE, TX....................... 3,686 3,686
CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX........... 348 348
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX....... 3,398 3,398
DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX.......... 6,393 6,393
ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL 38 38
PROJECT, TX..........................
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE 4,179 4,179
PINES, TX............................
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX................... 7,020 7,020
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX...... 6,022 6,022
GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX......... 2,706 2,706
GIWW, CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX............. 2,926 2,926
GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX.............. 2,225 2,225
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX.................... 2,900 2,900
GREENS BAYOU, TX...................... 850 850
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX........ 31,874 31,874
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX.................. 1,479 1,479
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX.............. 15,354 14,854
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX..... 1,936 1,936
JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX.................. 2,001 2,001
JOE POOL LAKE, TX..................... 1,771 1,771
LAKE KEMP, TX......................... 214 214
LAVON LAKE, TX........................ 3,065 3,065
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX.................... 4,110 4,110
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX............ 6,173 6,173
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX................ 3,542 3,542
NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE 2,066 2,066
GEORGETOWN, TX.......................
O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX.......... 907 907
PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX.................... 1,005 1,005
PROCTOR LAKE, TX...................... 2,155 2,155
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX......... 304 304
RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX.................. 1,456 1,456
SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX............ 8,822 8,822
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX..... 5,820 5,820
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX... 101 101
SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX................... 3,157 3,157
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX............. 2,210 2,210
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX........... 1,482 1,482
TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX. 100 1,000
TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN LAKE, 2,735 2,735
TX...................................
WACO LAKE, TX......................... 3,090 3,090
WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX.................. 1,747 1,747
WHITNEY LAKE, TX...................... 8,559 8,559
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX........ 4,532 4,532
UTAH
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT..... 75 75
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT... 598 598
VERMONT
BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT................ 719 719
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT..... 70 70
NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY.... 80 80
NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT............... 635 635
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT............ 747 747
TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT.................... 681 681
UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT................. 578 578
VIRGINIA
APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA.................. ............... 500
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC, 1,823 1,823
VA...................................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, 967 967
VA...................................
CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE, VA..... 266 266
CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA................ 207 207
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA..... 2,022 2,022
HAMPTON RDS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS 1,108 1,108
HBR, VA (DRIFT REM...................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA..... 226 226
JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA............... 3,667 3,667
JOHN H KERR LAKE, VA & NC............. 11,571 11,571
JOHN W FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA 1,938 1,938
LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA................... 1,058 1,058
NORFOLK HARBOR, VA.................... 10,072 10,072
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA.... 656 656
PHILPOTT LAKE, VA..................... 6,961 6,961
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA......... 870 870
RUDEE INLET, VA....................... 370 370
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA. 54 54
WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA. 260 260
YORK RIVER, VA........................ 250 250
WASHINGTON
CHIEF JOSEPH DAM GAS ABATEMENT, WA\1\. 6,500 ...............
CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA.................. 785 785
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR.. 3 500
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND 6 500
SAND ISLAND, WA......................
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR 95,700 ...............
& ID\1\..............................
EDIZ HOOK, WA......................... 63 63
EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA 1,293 1,293
GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA... 9,180 9,180
HOWARD HANSON DAM ECOSYSTEM 15,000 ...............
RESTORATION, WA\1\...................
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA................. 2,627 2,627
ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, WA........... 4,982 4,982
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL 70 70
PROJECTS, WA.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA..... 623 623
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA........ 7,554 7,554
LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, WA......... 2,360 2,360
LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA........ 6,874 6,874
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA..... 7,787 4,664
LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE 1,500 ...............
COMPENSATION,\1\.....................
MILL CREEK LAKE, WA................... 2,437 2,437
MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA. 257 257
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA.................. 3,271 3,271
NEAH BAY, WA.......................... 308 308
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA......... 338 338
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA.. 997 997
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA.................. 1,572 1,572
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA... 506 506
SEATTLE HARBOR, WA.................... 913 913
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA............... 248 248
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 53 53
WATERS, WA...........................
SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA................. ............... 400
TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA............ 120 120
THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM, WA & OR...... 7,696 7,696
WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA.......... 34 34
WEST VIRGINIA
BEECH FORK LAKE, WV................... 1,473 2,500
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV.................... 1,508 1,508
BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV................... 1,973 1,973
EAST LYNN LAKE, WV.................... 2,044 2,044
ELKINS, WV............................ 14 14
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV..... 255 255
KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV...... 9,380 9,380
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH 30,292 30,292
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & 2,700 2,700
OH...................................
R D BAILEY LAKE, WV................... 2,836 2,836
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV............ 1,039 1,039
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV................. 2,044 2,044
SUTTON LAKE, WV....................... 2,210 2,210
TYGART LAKE, WV....................... 1,521 1,521
WISCONSIN
EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI.............. 611 611
FOX RIVER, WI......................... 1,775 3,775
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI\1\............... 4,344 5,394
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI..... 125 125
MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI.................. 650 650
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI......... 160 160
STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN 16 16
SHIP CANAL, WI.......................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY 498 498
WATERS, WI...........................
TWO RIVER HARBOR, WI.................. ............... 400
WYOMING
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY..... 34 34
JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY............... 326 326
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY... 87 87
TOTALLING ADJUSTMENTS................. -20 ...............
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER 2,348,593 2,161,160
STATES.........................
REMAINING ITEMS
AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH..... 690 690
ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND 4,750 4,750
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE................
BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M 5,865 5,865
BUSINESS LINES.......................
ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE 7,737 4,000
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE............
COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM........ 2,475 2,475
CONTINUING AUTHORITY PROJECTS NOT 2,278 ...............
REQUIRING SPECIFIC LEGISLATION
BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL
(SECTION 204/207/933)................
NATIONAL MITIGATION PROJECTS 5,325 ...............
(SECTION 111)....................
CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION).. 1,500 1,500
DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE.......... 12,000 12,000
DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE 1,062 1,062
MONITORING SYSTEM....................
DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL 6,080 6,080
RESTORATION (DOE.....................
DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT 1,391 1,391
PROGRAM (DOTS).......................
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM.. 270 270
FACILITY PROTECTION................... 12,000 12,000
GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL.. 900 900
INDEPENDENT (PART) ASSESSMENT OF 500 500
ENVIRONMENT--STEWARDSHIP.............
INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS..... 3,708 3,708
INLAND NAVIGATION SAFETY INITIATIVE... 3,000 3,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS......... 1,780 1,780
MONITORING OF COASTAL NAVIGATION 1,575 1,575
PROJECTS.............................
NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM...... 7,000 13,900
NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM........... 15,000 15,000
NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (NEPP) 6,000 6,000
NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY...... 10,000 10,000
NATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 3,326 3,326
ACTIVITIES...........................
NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR 300 300
REALLOCATION.........................
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT 300 300
(ABS-P2, WINABS).....................
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION:
REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS......... 500 500
PROTECT, CLEAR AND STRAIGHTEN 50 50
CHANNELS (SEC 3).................
WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS.... 4,271 4,271
HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA 725 725
COLLECTION.......................
RECREATION ONE STOP (R1S) NATIONAL 1,130 1,130
RECREATION RESERVAT..................
REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT 1,391 4,500
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM................
Southeast Oahu Regional Sediment ............... (500)
Management, HI...................
North Carolina RSM, NC............ ............... (600)
Delaware Estuary RSM, NJ.......... ............... (300)
South Jetty and Clatsop Spit, OR.. ............... (500)
South Coastal Rhode Island ............... (750)
Regional Sediment Management.....
Long Island Coastal Planning, NY.. ............... (500)
RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR 608 608
REHAB................................
WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT 653 653
(WOTS)...............................
---------------------------------
SUBTOTAL FOR ITEMS NOT LISTED 126,140 124,809
UNDER STATES...................
TOTALLING ADJUSTMENTS................. 267 ...............
ANTICIPATED SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE...... ............... -65,969
---------------------------------
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 2,475,000 2,220,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ITEMS FUNDED IN CONSTRUCTION.
Lowell Creek Tunnel, Alaska.--The Committee recommendation
includes $500,000 for studies to divert tunnel flood flows away
from the city of Seward.
Petersberg Harbor, Alaska.--$500,000 is recommended to
obtain environmental clearances in advance of a planned
dredging of the harbor in 2010.
Helena Harbor, Arkansas.--The Committee recommends $400,000
for maintenance dredging of this harbor.
Osceola Harbor, Arkansas.--The Committee recommends
$500,000 for maintenance dredging of this harbor.
Dana Point Harbor, California.--The Committee has
recommended $700,000 for surveys and dredging.
Noyo Harbor, California.--$750,000 is recommended for
dredging.
Cherry Creek, Chatfield, and Trinidad Lakes, Colorado.--The
Committee has recommended an additional $1,000,000 for
continued repairs at these three lakes. This action in no way
is intended to alter the Corps of Engineers' lease and property
accountability policies. It is the Committee's understanding
that the State of Colorado has agreed to cost share this
project on a 50-50 basis. It is also the understanding of the
Committee that the Secretary is not to assume, nor share in the
future of the operation and maintenance of these recreation
facilities.
Harbor of Refuge, Lewes, Delaware.--The Committee
recommends $500,000 to perform a stability analysis, as well
as, surveys and design work on the historic breakwater in this
harbor.
Small Harbors, Delaware.--The Committee recommendation
includes funds to dredge a number of small harbors in Delaware.
With the limited funding available to the Committee, the
Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging
needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on
these small harbors is constantly changing the Committee is
directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal
year 2009 that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds
available for these harbor projects.
Wilmington Harbor, Delaware.--The Committee recommendation
includes $3,750,000 for this project. Additional funds
recommended above the budget request are for maintenance of
disposal areas and additional dredging.
Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee to Anclote,
Florida.--The Committee recommends $1,000,000 for maintenance
dredging.
Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Florida.--The
Committee recommendation includes $2,500,000 for maintenance
dredging.
Miami River, Florida.--The Committee recommends $10,820,000
for completion of the dredging of the Miami River Channel. This
project provides the first maintenance dredging of the Miami
River since its original authorization in 1930.
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Georgia.--$1,000,000 is
recommended for dredging critical areas of this waterway as
well as for work related to new upland disposal sites.
Savannah Harbor, Georgia.--The Committee recommendation for
Savannah Harbor includes the funds recommended for O&M in this
account and $5,275,000 in the Dredged Material Disposal
Facilities program in the Construction, General account. The
administration proposed these two funding amounts as a single
line item in O&M.
Barbers Point, Hawaii.--The Committee recommends an
additional $348,000 above the budget request for daily
operation and maintenance and facility upgrades to public use
facilities.
Northwestern Division Projects, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas,
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, and Oregon.--Small changes were
recommended to the budget request by the Corps. The Senate
request shown for these projects represents the revised budget
amount not an increase or decrease taken by the Committee.
Chicago Harbor, Illinois.--The Committee is aware of the
City of Chicago's interest in modifying the existing Chicago
Lakefront Inner Breakwater consistent with the City of
Chicago's 2016 Olympic Master Plan for Chicago Harbor. The
Committee encourages the Chicago District of the Army Corps of
Engineers to work with the City of Chicago on preliminary
design concepts, cost estimates and other aspects of the
project to determine what environmental, recreational and
economic development benefits might be achieved by the City's
proposal.
Green and Barren Rivers, Kentucky.--The Committee
recommends an additional $1,000,000 for the Green River Lock
and Dam number 3 (Rochester Lock) detailed engineering analysis
for stabilizing the existing lock structure and further the
evaluation of the stability of the dam structure.
Barren River Lake, Kentucky.--The Committee recommends an
additional $2,000,000 for the Port Oliver Public Use Facility.
Small Waterway Dredging on the Louisiana Coast,
Louisiana.--The Committee has included additional funds for a
number of the smaller waterways on the Louisiana gulf coast
that were not funded in the administration's budget request.
With the limited funding available to the Committee, the
Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging
needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on
these small waterways is constantly changing the Committee is
directing the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal
year 2009 that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds
available for these harbor projects.
Small Harbors, Maryland.--The Committee recommendation
includes funds to dredge a number of small harbors used by
waterman on the Chesapeake Bay. With the limited funding
available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to
provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. However,
recognizing that conditions on these small waterways is
constantly changing the Committee is directing the Corps to
propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most
effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these harbor
projects
New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, Massachusetts.--The
Committee has recommended an additional $100,000 to evaluate
improvements to the barrier in cooperation with the city to
improve pedestrian access to the waterfront.
Michigan Harbor Dredging, Michigan.--The Committee notes
that there are some 50 federally maintained harbors and
waterways in Michigan. However, the Committee also notes that
fewer than 20 are budgeted. With the limited funding available
to the Committee, the Committee has recommended $5,000,000
under this line item to provide for some of the dredging needs
of the State rather than trying to fund small amounts for each
project. The Committee has listed all of the harbors and
waterways in the table that are eligible for this funding.
However, recognizing that conditions on these small waterways
is constantly changing and the Great Lakes are suffering from
near historic low water levels, the Committee is directing the
Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that
would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available for
these harbor and waterway projects.
Rouge River, Michigan.--The Committee recommendation for
Rouge River includes the funds recommended for O&M in this
account and $160,000 in the Dredged Material Disposal
Facilities program in the Construction, General account. The
administration proposed these two funding amounts as a single
line item in O&M.
Mouth of the Yazoo River, Mississippi.---The Committee
includes additional funds for the maintenance dredging of the
entrance to the Vicksburg Harbor.
Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi.--The Committee has
recommended $7,500,000 for this project. Additional funds above
the budget request are to perform maintenance dredging of the
Bar Channel, the Pascagoula River, and Bayou Casotte channels.
Rosedale Harbor, Mississippi.--The Committee recommendation
includes $500,000 for maintenance dredging of the harbor.
Absecon Inlet, New Jersey.--The Committee recommends
$250,000 for dredging of the inlet.
Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Program,
New Mexico.--The Committee has included $200,000 for the Corps
to participate with the Bureau of Reclamation, the State and
other agencies in the Rio Grande Collaborative Program.
Rio Grande Bosque Rehabilitation, New Mexico.--The
Committee includes $4,000,000 to continue fire reduction work
and general Bosque rehabilitation in order to complete repairs
and fire protection resulting from 2003 and 2004 fires in the
urban interface.
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, North Carolina.--The
Committee recommends $2,000,000 for dredging of the project.
Coastal Inlets, North Carolina.--The Committee has included
additional funds for the coastal inlets on the North Carolina
coast that were not funded in the administration's budget
request. With the limited funding available to the Committee,
the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging
needs of the State. However, recognizing that conditions on
these inlets are constantly changing the Committee is directing
the Corps to propose a dredging program for fiscal year 2009
that would most effectively utilize the scarce funds available
for these inlets.
Garrison Dam and Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota.--The
Committee recommends $1,700,000 for the Williston Pumping Plant
feature of the project; $100,000 for mosquito control; and
$500,000 for the Corps to work in cooperation with the Friends
of Lake Sakakawea to ensure the recreation sites around the
lake can be utilized.
Homme Lake, North Dakota.--Additional funds are recommended
for dam safety activities and non-routine maintenance
activities.
Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, North Dakota.--Additional
funds are recommended to ensure basic levels of service, and
for non-routine maintenance and dam safety activities.
Oregon Coastal Ports, Oregon.--The Committee has included
additional funds for a number of the coastal harbors on the
Oregon coast that were either not funded or underfunded in the
administration's budget request. With the limited funding
available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to
provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. However,
recognizing that conditions on these inlets are constantly
changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a
dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most
effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these
harbors.
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Sioux, South
Dakota.--The Committee notes that title VI of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999, as amended, requires that
funding to inventory and stabilize cultural and historic sites
along the Missouri River in South Dakota, and to carry out the
terrestrial wildlife habitat programs, shall be provided from
the Operation and Maintenance account. The Committee provides
$3,000,000 to protect cultural resource sites and provide
funding to the State and tribes for approved restoration and
stewardship plans and in compliance with the requirements of
title VI, directs the Corps to contract with or reimburse the
State of South Dakota and affected tribes to carry out these
duties.
Rhode Island Harbors, Rhode Island.--The Committee has
included additional funds for a number of the harbors in Rhode
Island that were either not funded or underfunded in the
administration's budget request. With the limited funding
available to the Committee, the Committee has attempted to
provide for some of the dredging needs of the State. However,
recognizing that conditions on these inlets are constantly
changing the Committee is directing the Corps to propose a
dredging program for fiscal year 2009 that would most
effectively utilize the scarce funds available for these
harbors.
Fox Point Hurricane Barrier, Rhode Island.--$500,000 is
recommended for the transfer of the project and routine O&M of
the project.
Woonsocket, Rhode Island.--$300,000 is recommended for the
transfer of the project and routine O&M of the project.
Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.--The
Committee recommendation for Charleston Harbor includes the
funds recommended for O&M in this account and $2,580,000 in the
Dredged Material Disposal Facilities program in the
Construction, General account. The administration proposed
these two funding amounts as a single line item in O&M.
Oahe Dam, Lake Oahe, South Dakota, and North Dakota.--The
Committee has recommended $300,000 to allow the Corps to modify
public facilities so that they can be utilized with the extreme
low water levels currently being experienced on the lake.
Houston Ship Channel, Texas.--The Committee recommendation
for the Houston Ship Channel includes the funds recommended for
O&M in this account and $500,000 in the Construction, General
account for beneficial use of dredged material. The
administration proposed these two funding amounts as a single
line item in O&M.
Texas Water Allocation Study, Texas.--The Committee
recommends $1,000,000 for this ongoing study.
Chinook, Head of Sand Island, and Baker Bay, Washington.--
The Committee notes the proximity of Corps navigation
facilities on the Columbia River between Chinook and the Head
of Sand Island, Washington, and at Baker Bay, Washington, and
encourage the Corps of Engineers to seek ways to achieve cost
savings and efficiency, such as by utilizing appropriate
contracting methods while having these two projects be
considered together when seeking bids and awarding contracts.
Mud Mountain Dam, Washington.--Within the funds
recommended, the Corps is directed to continue to satisfy
Federal fish passage obligations for the term of the
cooperative agreement with Puget Sound Energy.
Beech Fork Lake, West Virginia.--Additional funds
recommended above the budget request are for repairs of public
use facilities.
Fox River, Wisconsin.--Additional funds recommended above
the budget request are to reimburse Wisconsin, in accordance
with the agreement, for the costs of repairs and rehabilitation
of the transferred locks and for the Corps of Engineers to
undertake major repairs for the dams and associated
infrastructure.
Green Bay Harbor, Wisconsin.--The Committee recommendation
for Green Bay Harbor includes the funds recommended for O&M in
this account and $950,000 in the Dredged Material Disposal
Facilities program in the Construction, General account. The
administration proposed these two funding amounts as a single
line item in O&M. The Committee has also recommended an
additional $1,050,000 for backlog maintenance dredging.
Actions for Change to Improve Operation and Maintenance.--
The Committee has recommended $4,000,000 for this item. The
Committee believes that these funds can serve to make
significant improvements to the way the Corps administers
completed projects to account for changed conditions since
construction.
National Coastal Mapping.--$13,900,000 is recommended for
this program. Additional funds recommended above the budget
request are for LIDAR bathymetry for use in regional sediment
management and for Coastal Zone Mapping and Imaging LIDAR/LASER
to be conducted with the University of Southern Mississippi.
Regional Sediment Management Demonstration Program.--The
Committee has recommended $4,500,000 for this program,
$3,000,000 above the budget request. Within the funds
recommended, the Corps is directed to undertake studies for the
Southeast Coast of Oahu, Hawaii; the State of North Carolina;
South Coastal Rhode Island; Delaware Estuary, New Jersey; and
for Long Island, New York coastal planning.
FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES
Appropriations, 2008....................................................
Budget estimate, 2009................................... $40,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 40,000,000
The Committee has recommended $40,000,000 for the FCCE
account. This account provides funds for preparedness
activities for natural and other disasters, response, and
emergency flood fighting and rescue operations, hurricane
response, and emergency shore protection work. It also provides
for emergency supplies of clean water where the source has been
contaminated or where adequate supplies of water are needed for
consumption.
REGULATORY PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $180,000,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 180,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 183,000,000
An appropriation of $183,000,000 is recommended for the
regulatory program of the Corps of Engineers.
This appropriation provides for salaries and costs incurred
administering regulation of activities affecting U.S. waters,
including wetlands, in accordance with the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 33 U.S.C. section 401, the Clean Water Act of 1977
Public Law 95-217, and the Marine Protection, Research and
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 Public Law 92-532.
The appropriation helps maintain program performance,
protects important aquatic resources, and supports partnerships
with States and local communities through watershed planning
efforts.
The Committee is aware that the Corps of Engineers has
begun a pilot program aimed at streamlining decisions for
certain complex, high impact permit applications which have
national or large regional implications. Specifically, we
understand this program is focusing on projects related to rail
capacity expansion, highway construction and pipelines where
knowledge and experience gained in one district can be shared
with other districts facing similar challenges, thus promoting
efficiencies, the development and sharing of ``best
practices,'' and use of virtual or dedicated teams to expedite
broad-impact permit applications. Since the Committee continues
to be concerned about the permit application backlog and delays
in making permit decisions, it fully supports this effort and
encourages the Corps to dedicate even more attention and expand
its efforts to an even greater extent in developing and using
this pilot program to minimize negative impacts of the backlog
and resulting delays, especially where there are significant
impacts to the nation's economy and environmental health. The
Committee further supports the three emphasis areas selected
for the pilot program as it believes them to be critical
elements of a healthy, expanding economy which must be
vigorously developed, but in an environmentally sound manner.
The Committee is keenly aware that U.S. economic health and
national security depends on the continued availability of
reliable and affordable energy. The Committee is also aware
that the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Regulatory Branch
plays a key role by authorizing much of the 1.13 billion tons
of coal production expected this year through its regulatory
program.
Therefore, the Committee directs the Corps to work with the
Office of Surface Mining [OSM] to develop a more efficient
process for issuing permits associated with surface coal mining
operations. To avoid unnecessary time delays and duplication of
agency resources, the Corps shall maintain the availability of
a meaningful general permit for surface coal mining that may be
issued in coordination with and for the term of the permit
already required pursuant to the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act [SMCRA]. The Corps should also dedicate
sufficient personnel and financial resources to support a
consistent program for permit review and issuance.
The Committee has included legislative text directing the
Corps to reimburse the Port of Arlington, Oregon, up to
$3,200,000 of the funds recommended for direct construction
costs determined by the secretary to have been incurred by the
port as a result of the issuance of a permit to construct a
commercial dock and offload facility. Due to not scrupulously
following established permit procedures the Corps was forced to
withdraw the permit after the port had invested some
$2,500,000. The port is now required to deconstruct these
facilities. Reimbursement for the costs for removal of these
facilities shall also be provided within this amount.
FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $140,000,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 130,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 140,000,000
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $140,000,000
to continue activities related to the Formerly Utilized Sites
Remedial Action Program [FUSRAP] in fiscal year 2005.
The responsibility for the cleanup of contaminated sites
under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program was
transferred to the Army Corps of Engineers in the fiscal year
1998 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public
Law 105-62.
FUSRAP is not specifically defined by statute. The program
was established in 1974 under the broad authority of the Atomic
Energy Act and, until fiscal year 1998, funds for the cleanup
of contaminated defense sites had been appropriated to the
Department of Energy through existing appropriation accounts.
In appropriating FUSRAP funds to the Corps of Engineers, the
Committee intended to transfer only the responsibility for
administration and execution of cleanup activities at eligible
sites where remediation had not been completed. It did not
intend to transfer ownership of and accountability for real
property interests that remain with the Department of Energy.
The Corps of Engineers has extensive experience in the
cleanup of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive wastes through its
work for the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies.
The Committee always intended for the Corps' expertise be used
in the same manner for the cleanup of contaminated sites under
FUSRAP. The Committee expects the Corps to continue programming
and budgeting for FUSRAP as part of the Corps of Engineers--
Civil program. The Committee directs the Corps to prioritize
sites that are nearing completion during fiscal year 2008.
The Corps is directed to prioritize sites that are nearing
completion and initiate cleanup expeditiously for the former
Sylvania nuclear fuel site in Hicksville, New York.
GENERAL EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $175,046,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 177,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 177,000,000
This appropriation finances the expenses of the Office,
Chief of Engineers, the Division Offices, and certain research
and statistical functions of the Corps of Engineers. The
Committee recommendation is $177,000,000.
Executive Direction and Management.--The Office of the
Chief of Engineers and 8 division offices supervise work in 38
district offices.
Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity.--This support
center provides administrative services (such as personnel,
logistics, information management, and finance and accounting)
for the Office of the Chief of Engineers and other separate
field operating activities.
Institute for Water Resources.--This institute performs
studies, analyses, and develops planning techniques for the
management and development of the Nation's water resources.
United States Army Corps of Engineers Finance Center.--This
center provides centralized support for all Corps finance and
accounting.
Office of Congressional Affairs.--The Committee has
included statutory language for the past several years
prohibiting any funds from being used to fund an Office of
Congressional Affairs within the executive office of the Chief
of Engineers. The Committee believes that an Office of
Congressional Affairs for the Civil Works Program would hamper
the efficient and effective coordination of issues with the
Committee staff and Members of Congress. The Committee believes
that the technical knowledge and managerial expertise needed
for the Corps headquarters to effectively address Civil Works
authorization, appropriation, and headquarters policy matters
resides in the Civil Works organization. Therefore, the
Committee strongly recommends that the Office of Congressional
Affairs not be a part of the process by which information on
Civil Works projects, programs, and activities is provided to
Congress.
The Committee reminds the Corps that the General Expenses
account is to be used exclusively for executive oversight and
management of the Civil Works Program.
In 1998, The Chief of Engineers issued a Command Directive
transferring the oversight and management of the General
Expenses account, as well as the manpower associated with this
function, from the Civil Works Directorate to the Resource
Management Office. The Corps is reminded that General Expense
funds are appropriated solely for the executive management and
oversight of the Civil Works Program under the direction of the
Director of Civil Works.
The Committee is pleased with the efforts of the Corps to
restructure the management of general expense funds. It
continues to believe that the general expense dollars are
ultimately at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers and are
intended to be utilized in his effort to carry out the Corps'
civil works mission. The new controls put in place to manage
the general expense dollars and evaluate the needs of the Corps
address the Committee's previous concerns. The Committee
requests the Corps continue to provide biannual written
notification of the dispersal of general expense funds.
Millions of dollars have been spent over the last several
years on an initiative to contract out Government jobs in order
to make the Government more efficient. However, in more than 70
percent of the cases Government employees win the competition
for their jobs. The Committee fails to see any evidence of cost
savings or increased efficiency by undergoing these expensive
competitions. Therefore, the Committee directs that no funds
provided in this account or otherwise available for expenditure
shall be used to comply with the competitive sourcing
initiative.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS)
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $4,500,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 6,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,500,000
The Committee has recommended $4,500,000 for the Office of
the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) [OASA(CW)].
As has been previously stated, the Committee believes that this
office should be funded through the Defense appropriations bill
and directs the administration to budget for this office under
the Department of Defense, Operation and Maintenance--Army
account in future budget submissions. The Committee continues
to believe that the ASA(CW) has neither the time nor should he
be involved in the day-to-day operational matters of the civil
works program. It is the Committee's opinion that the
traditional role of the ASA(CW) is to provide the Chief of
Engineers advice about policy matters and generally be the
political spokesperson for the administration's policies;
however, the Chief of Engineers is responsible for carrying out
the program. This is underscored by the administration's budget
documents that state that the OASA(CW) provides policy
direction and oversight for the civil works program and the
Headquarters of the Corps provides executive direction and
management of the civil works program.
The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works advises
the Secretary of the Army on a variety of matters, including
the Civil Works program of the Corps of Engineers. The
Assistant Secretary is a member of the Army Secretariat with
responsibilities, such as participating in Continuity of
Government exercises that extend well beyond Civil Works. The
Assistant Secretary also oversees the administration, operation
and maintenance, and capital development of Arlington National
Cemetery and the Soldiers' and Airmen's Home National Cemetery.
Congressional oversight of the Army Cemetery program lies not
with the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, but
rather with the Appropriations Subcommittee on Military
Construction and Veterans Affairs and with the Committee on
Veterans Affairs.
The Army's accounting system does not track OMA funding of
overhead or Army-wide support offices on the basis of which
office receives support, nor would it be efficient or effective
to do so for a 20-person office. Instead, expenses such as
legal support, personnel services, finance and accounting
services, the executive motor pool, travel on military
aircraft, and other support services are centrally funded and
managed on a department-wide basis. Transferring the funding
for the expenses of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Works to
a separate account has greatly complicated the Army's
accounting for such indirect and overhead expenses with no
commensurate benefit to justify the change. The Committee does
not agree that these costs should be funded in this bill and
therefore has only provided funding for salaries and expenses
as in previous years.
GENERAL PROVISIONS--CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL
Section 101. The bill includes language concerning
reprogramming guidelines.
Section 102. The bill includes language prohibiting
implementation of competitive sourcing or HPO.
Section 103. The bill includes language prohibiting the
divesting or transferring Civil Works functions.
Section 104. The bill includes language concerning report
notifications.
Section 105. The bill includes language concerning
reallocations in Lake Cumberland, Kentucky.
Section 106. The bill includes language regarding the
Middle Rio Grande Collaborative Program, New Mexico.
Section 107. The bill includes language regarding
congressional budget justifications.
Section 108. The bill includes language authorizing a study
of the Missouri River.
Section 109. The bill includes language increasing the cost
ceiling for the Folsom, California, Bridge.
Section 110. The bill includes language regarding crediting
of non-Federal expenditures on the San Lorenzo River,
California project.
Section 111. The bill includes language concerning the
Missouri River Levee System.
Section 112. The bill includes language concerning Corps of
Engineers Senior Executive Service positions.
Section 113. The bill includes language regarding a
replacement health care facility at Lake Sakakawea, North
Dakota.
Section 114. The bill includes language concerning
continuing contracts and the Inland Waterway Trust Fund.
Section 115. The bill includes language increasing the cost
ceiling on the LMRMRIS.
Section 116. The bill includes language modifying the
Middle Rio Grande Bosque project.
Section 117. The bill includes language modifying the San
Antonio, Texas, project.
Section 118. The bill includes language concerning the
Morganza to the Gulf, Louisiana project.
Section 119. The bill includes language concerning
Chatfield Lake, Colorado.
Section 120. The bill includes language increasing the cost
ceiling for the Big Sioux River, South Dakota project.
TITLE II
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah Project Completion Account
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $43,000,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 42,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 42,000,000
The Committee recommendation for fiscal year 2009 to carry
out the provisions of the Central Utah Project Completion Act
totals $42,000,000. An appropriation of $39,373,000 has been
provided for Central Utah project construction; $987,000 for
fish, wildlife, and recreation, mitigation and conservation.
The Committee recommendation provides $1,640,000 for program
administration and oversight.
Legislative language is included which allows up to
$1,500,000 of the funds provided to be used for administrative
costs.
The Central Utah Project Completion Act (titles II-VI of
Public Law 102-575) provides for the completion of the central
Utah project by the Central Utah Water Conservancy District.
The Act also authorizes the appropriation of funds for fish,
wildlife, recreation, mitigation, and conservation; establishes
an account in the Treasury for the deposit of these funds and
of other contributions for mitigation and conservation
activities; and establishes a Utah Reclamation Mitigation and
Conservation Commission to administer funds in that account.
The act further assigns responsibilities for carrying out the
act to the Secretary of the Interior and prohibits delegation
of those responsibilities to the Bureau of Reclamation.
Bureau of Reclamation
WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $949,882,000
Budget estimate, 2009\1\................................ 779,320,000
Committee recommendation................................ 927,320,000
\1\Includes rescission of $175,000,000.
An appropriation of $927,320,000 is recommended by the
Committee for general investigations of the Bureau of
Reclamation. The water and related resources account supports
the development, management, and restoration of water and
related natural resources in the 17 Western States. The account
includes funds for operating and maintaining existing
facilities to obtain the greatest overall level of benefits, to
protect public safety, and to conduct studies on ways to
improve the use of water and related natural resources. Work
will be done in partnership and cooperation with non-Federal
entities and other Federal agencies.
The Committee has divided underfinancing between the
Resources Management Subaccount and the Facilities Operation
and Maintenance subaccount. The Committee directs that the
underfinancing amount in each subaccount initially be applied
uniformly across all projects within the subaccounts. Upon
applying the underfinanced amounts, normal reprogramming
procedures should be undertaken to account for schedule
slippages, accelerations or other unforeseen conditions.
DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS
The Committee received more than 130 requests for projects,
programs, studies or activities for the Bureau of Reclamation
for fiscal year 2009. These were items that were additions to
the budget request as well as those included in the budget
request. The Committee obviously was unable to accommodate all
of these requests.
In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding
provided in the Energy and Water bill, all disclosures are made
in this report accompanying the bill.
All of the projects funded in this report have gone through
the same rigorous public review and approval process as those
proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these
projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed
projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary
prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to
decide what not to fund.
A new table has been added to the end of this report to
show the requestors of the various projects. For those
programs, projects, or studies that were included in the
budgetary documents provided in the budget request, the words
``the President'' has been added to denote this administration
request. The level of funding provided for each of these
programs projects or studies should not be construed as what
was requested. Rather, the only intent is to disclose the
requestor.
It should be noted that many line items only have the
President listed as the requestor. It should not be inferred
that the affected members are not interested in these projects
studies or activities. Rather this is due to Committee
direction that the President's budget requests are the basis
for the Committee bill and a requests by the affected Members
is unnecessary unless a Member wishes to request a different
amount than the budget request.
The purposes for the funding provided in the various
accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each
account. The location of the programs, projects or studies are
denoted in the account tables.
The amounts recommended by the Committee are shown on the
following table along with the budget request.
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION--WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget estimate Committee
------------------------- recommendation
Project title -----------------------
Resources Facilities Resources Facilities
management OM&R management OM&R
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARIZONA
AK CHIN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT.................... ........... 9,900 .......... 9,900
ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT............................ ........... .......... 1,000 ..........
COLORADO RIVER BASIN, CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT.................. 26,528 322 28,028 322
COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM..................... 2,350 .......... 2,350 ..........
NORTHERN ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................ 320 .......... 320 ..........
PHOENIX METROPOLITAN WATER REUSE PROJECT....................... 200 .......... 200 ..........
SALT RIVER PROJECT............................................. 469 131 469 131
SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT................... 325 .......... 325 ..........
SOUTH/CENTRAL ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................... 718 .......... 718 ..........
SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT........... 2,969 .......... 2,969 ..........
YUMA AREA PROJECTS............................................. 1,658 20,205 1,658 20,205
YUMA EAST WETLANDS............................................. ........... .......... 1,500 ..........
CALIFORNIA
CACHUMA PROJECT................................................ 1,016 702 1,016 1,102
CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................. 352 .......... 352 ..........
CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECYCLING PLANT............. 800 .......... 1,500 ..........
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTS:
AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION.................................... 1,708 7,772 1,708 7,772
AUBURN--FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT.................................. 2,088 .......... 2,088 ..........
DELTA DIVISION............................................. 15,138 5,599 15,138 5,599
EAST SIDE DIVISION......................................... 1,591 2,943 1,591 2,943
FRIANT DIVISION............................................ 1,988 3,733 3,988 3,733
MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS............................. 12,006 1,145 16,006 1,145
REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINTAINANCE.... ........... 24,091 .......... 24,091
SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION.................................. 931 1,497 7,931 1,497
SAN FELIPE DIVISION........................................ 675 100 675 100
SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION....................................... 391 .......... 391 ..........
SHASTA DIVISION............................................ 150 7,764 150 7,764
TRINITY RIVER DIVISION..................................... 7,215 3,102 7,815 3,102
WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS................................. 1,117 8,334 1,117 8,334
WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT................... 3,497 5,422 3,497 5,422
YIELD FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION............................ 303 .......... 303 ..........
INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL WATER RECYCLING PROJECT................. ........... .......... 1,000 ..........
IRVINE BASIN GROUND AND SURFACE WATER.......................... ........... .......... 1,000 ..........
LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDS................................... 100 .......... 100 ..........
LONG BEACH AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT............ 692 .......... 692 ..........
LONG BEACH DESALINATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJ.......... ........... .......... 1,000 ..........
MOKELUMNE RIVER REGIONAL WATER STORAGE & CONJUNCTIVE USE STUDY. ........... .......... .......... ..........
ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT............... 558 .......... 558 ..........
ORLAND PROJECT................................................. ........... 703 .......... 703
SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT.................................... 700 .......... 700 ..........
SAN DIEGO AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM............. 3,000 .......... 3,000 ..........
SAN GABRIEL BASIN PROJECT...................................... 700 .......... 700 ..........
SAN JOSE AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM.............. 250 .......... 250 ..........
SOLANO PROJECT................................................. 1,626 2,863 1,626 2,863
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM..................... 260 .......... 260 ..........
VENTURA RIVER PROJECT.......................................... 389 31 389 31
COLORADO
ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT, CRSP.................................. 49,743 257 49,743 257
COLLBRAN PROJECT............................................... 166 1,390 166 1,390
COLORADO--BIG THOMPSON PROJECT................................. 450 12,842 450 12,842
COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................ 204 .......... 204 ..........
FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT....................................... 75 154 75 154
FRYINGPAN--ARKANSAS PROJECT.................................... 172 8,123 172 8,123
GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II............................ 164 1,281 164 1,281
LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY.............................. 36 3,059 36 3,059
MANCOS PROJECT................................................. 42 104 42 104
PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II.......................... 50 2,366 50 2,366
PINE RIVER PROJECT............................................. 184 151 184 151
SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT........................................ 292 4,345 292 4,345
UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT............................................ 128 136 128 136
UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS................................ 250 .......... 250 ..........
IDAHO
BOISE AREA PROJECTS............................................ 2,769 2,515 2,769 2,515
COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT............... 18,000 .......... 18,000 ..........
IDAHO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................... 179 .......... 179 ..........
LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTS..................................... 548 30 548 30
MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS......................................... 2,768 2,790 2,768 2,790
KANSAS
KANSAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................. 73 .......... 73 ..........
WICHITA-CHENEY PROJECT......................................... 10 375 10 375
WICHITA PROJECT--EQUUS BEDS DIVISION........................... 50 .......... 1,050 ..........
MONTANA
FORT PECK RESERVATION/DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM........... ........... .......... 15,000 ..........
HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT........................................... ........... 653 .......... 653
HUNTLEY PROJECT................................................ 52 108 52 108
LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT...................................... 31 15 31 15
MILK RIVER PROJECT............................................. 308 1,340 308 1,340
MONTANA INVESTIGATIONS......................................... 134 .......... 134 ..........
ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA REGIONAL WATER................ ........... .......... 10,000 ..........
SUN RIVER PROJECT.............................................. 75 275 75 275
NEBRASKA
MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT........................................... 12 158 12 158
NEBRASKA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................ 64 .......... 64 ..........
NEVADA
HALFWAY WASH PROJECT STUDY..................................... 200 .......... 200 ..........
LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT......................................... 5,021 2,684 7,521 2,684
LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM............................... 900 .......... 2,725 ..........
NORTH LAS VEGAS, WATER REUSE................................... ........... .......... 3,000 ..........
NEW MEXICO
ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA WATER RECYCLING AND REUSE............... ........... .......... 1,000 ..........
CARLSBAD PROJECT............................................... 2,657 1,127 2,657 1,127
EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SUPPLY.......................... ........... .......... 500 ..........
JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM................ ........... .......... 1,000 ..........
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT...................................... 13,047 9,653 16,047 9,653
NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER SUPPLY, NM, UT, CO......................... ........... .......... 1,000 ..........
NAVAJO NATION INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................... 77 .......... 77 ..........
PECOS RIVER BASIN WATER SALVAGE PROJECT........................ ........... 203 .......... 203
RIO GRANDE PROJECT............................................. 590 3,752 590 3,752
SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................... 59 .......... 59 ..........
SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO/WEST TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.......... 57 .......... 57 ..........
TUCUMCARI PROJECT.............................................. 23 35 23 35
UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN INVESTIGATIONS.......................... 29 .......... 29 ..........
NORTH DAKOTA
PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--GARRISON DIVERSION UNIT............. 16,495 5,611 64,375 5,611
OKLAHOMA
ARBUCKLE PROJECT............................................... 48 241 48 241
CENTRAL OKLAHOMA MASTER CONSERVATORY DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY ........... .......... 250 ..........
MCGEE CREEK PROJECT............................................ 25 651 25 651
MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT.......................................... ........... 523 .......... 523
NORMAN PROJECT................................................. 26 447 26 447
OKLAHOMA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................ 128 .......... 128 ..........
WASHITA BASIN PROJECT.......................................... 30 1,396 30 1,396
W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT............................................ 65 416 65 416
OREGON
BURNT, MALHEUR, OWYHEE, AND POWER RIVER BASIN WATER ........... .......... 300 ..........
OPTIMIZATION FEASIBILITY STUDY................................
CROOKED RIVER PROJECT.......................................... 407 444 407 444
DESCHUTUS ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT........................ ........... .......... 300 ..........
DESCHUTES PROJECT.............................................. 238 178 988 178
EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS........................................ 542 286 542 286
KLAMATH PROJECT................................................ 23,388 1,612 23,388 1,612
OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................. 294 .......... 444 ..........
ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION..................... 577 325 577 325
SAVAGE RAPIDS DAM REMOVAL...................................... 3,000 .......... 3,000 ..........
TUALATIN BASIN WATER SUPPLY PROJECT............................ ........... .......... 400 ..........
TUALATIN PROJECT TITLE TRANSFER AND FACILITY ASSESSMENT STUDY.. ........... .......... 106 ..........
TUALATIN PROJECT............................................... 111 270 111 270
UMATILLA PROJECT............................................... 954 2,978 954 2,978
SOUTH DAKOTA
LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM............................. ........... .......... 30,000 ..........
MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT................................. ........... 15 .......... 15
MNI WICONI PROJECT............................................. 16,240 10,000 27,000 10,182
PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM.............................. ........... .......... 2,000 ..........
RAPID VALLEY PROJECT, DEERFIELD DAM............................ ........... 86 .......... 86
TEXAS
BALMORHEA PROJECT.............................................. 41 17 41 17
CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT......................................... 59 86 59 86
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES........................ 50 .......... 4,050 ..........
NUECES RIVER PROJECT........................................... 25 533 25 533
SAN ANGELO PROJECT............................................. 35 367 35 367
TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................... 146 .......... 146 ..........
UTAH
HYRUM PROJECT.................................................. 146 32 146 32
MOON LAKE PROJECT.............................................. 3 73 3 73
NEWTON PROJECT................................................. 4 38 4 38
NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................... 156 .......... 456 ..........
OGDEN RIVER PROJECT............................................ 196 172 196 172
PARK CITY FEASIBILLTY STUDY.................................... ........... .......... 500 ..........
PROVO RIVER PROJECT............................................ 951 415 951 415
SCOFIELD PROJECT............................................... 55 78 55 78
STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT...................................... 203 20 203 20
SOUTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM........................... 121 .......... 121 ..........
WEBER BASIN PROJECT............................................ 1,028 720 1,028 720
WEBER RIVER PROJECT............................................ 30 107 30 107
WASHINGTON
COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT......................................... 3,737 6,811 6,737 6,811
ODESSA SUBAREA SPECIAL STUDY................................... 600 .......... 1,000 ..........
WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS....................................... 85 10 85 10
WASHINGTON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................. 57 .......... 145 ..........
YAKIMA PROJECT................................................. 1,201 6,565 1,701 6,799
YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT................... 8,503 .......... 8,503 ..........
YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER STORAGE............................... ........... .......... 500 ..........
WYOMING
KENDRICK PROJECT............................................... 91 3,242 91 3,242
NORTH PLATTE PROJECT........................................... 302 1,578 302 1,578
SHOSHONE PROJECT............................................... 84 665 84 665
WYOMING INVESTIGATIONS......................................... 26 .......... 26 ..........
------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL FOR PROJECTS.................................... 274,970 213,288 438,679 213,704
REGIONAL PROGRAMS
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL, TITLE I................. ........... 9,444 .......... 9,444
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL, TITLE II................ 5,850 .......... 5,850 ..........
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, SECTION 5.............................. 1,918 3,995 1,918 3,995
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, SECTION 8.............................. 710 .......... 710 ..........
COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM............... 265 .......... 265 ..........
DAM SAFETY PROGRAM:
DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.............................. ........... 1,250 .......... 1,250
INITIATE SOD CORRECTIVE ACTION............................. ........... 71,500 .......... 71,500
SAFETY OF EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS...................... ........... 18,500 .......... 18,500
DROUGHT EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM........................... 500 .......... 500 ..........
EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM................. ........... 1,422 .......... 1,422
ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION..................... 21,939 .......... 21,939 ..........
ENVIRONMENTAL & INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ACTIVITIES............ 1,739 .......... 1,739 ..........
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION........................... 973 .......... 973 ..........
EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES............................. ........... 6,254 .......... 6,254
FEDERAL BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY PROGRAM........................ ........... 1,384 .......... 1,384
GENERAL PLANNING STUDIES....................................... 2,163 .......... 2,163 ..........
LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.............................. 7,481 .......... 7,481 ..........
LOWER COLORADO RIVER INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAMS................... 243 .......... 243 ..........
LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM........................ 16,400 .......... 16,400 ..........
MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS......................... ........... 714 .......... 714
NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM................................ 7,020 .......... 7,020 ..........
NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING................ 1,658 .......... 1,658 ..........
OPERATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.............................. 684 522 684 522
PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--OTHER PICK-SLOAN.................... 3,687 37,053 3,687 37,053
POWER PROGRAM SERVICES......................................... 847 250 847 250
PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM............................... 641 155 641 155
RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION................................. 2,132 .......... 2,132 ..........
RECLAMATION RECREATION MANAGEMENT (TITLE XXVII)................ ........... .......... 1,000 ..........
RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION............ 951 .......... 951 ..........
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT:
DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM................ 375 1,600 2,375 1,600
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM............................. 9,000 .......... 9,000 ..........
RURAL WATER LEGISLATION, TITLE I............................... 1,000 .......... 1,000 ..........
SITE SECURITY.................................................. ........... 28,950 .......... 28,950
TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM.................. 800 .......... 3,300 ..........
UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES--TECHNICAL SUPPORT.......... 93 .......... 93 ..........
WATER FOR AMERICA INITIATIVE................................... 19,000 .......... 19,000 ..........
------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, REGIONAL PROGRAMS.............................. 108,069 182,993 113,169 183,393
UNDER FINANCING................................................ ........... .......... -18,183 -3,442
================================================
TOTAL WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES........................ 383,039 396,281 533,665 393,655
GRAND TOTAL.............................................. 779,320 779,320 927,320 927,320
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona Water Rights Settlement Act, Arizona.--Funds are
recommended for advance planning and environmental compliance
activities for rehabilitation of the San Carlos Irrigation
Project in cooperation with the San Carlos Irrigation and
Drainage District.
Central Arizona Project, Colorado River Basin.--The
Committee recommendation includes additional funds for
activities related to the Gila River Settlement in New Mexico
and Arizona.
Central Valley Project--Friant Division.--The Committee
recommendation includes an additional $1,000,000 for the
Friant-Kern and Madera canals capacity improvements and an
additional $1,000,000 for the Semi Tropic Phase II groundwater
banking.
Miscellaneous Project Programs.--An additional $4,000,000
above the budget request is provided for anadromous fish screen
projects.
Central Valley Project-Sacramento River Division.--Within
the funds recommended, $2,000,000 is recommended for the
Sacramento Valley Integrated Plan and $5,000,000 is recommended
for the Red Bluff Diversion Dam.
Central Valley Project-Trinity River Division.--The
Committee has recommended $600,000 above the budget request to
accelerate implementation of the Trinity River Restoration
Program.
Mokelumne River Regional Water Storage, California.--The
Committee directs the Secretary of the Department of the
Interior to initiate a feasibility study authorized in title V
of Public Law 109-338. In carrying out this study, the
Secretary of the Interior shall include the entire Mokelumne
River drainage as the study area and shall also consider
regional projects that include recommendations for expansion of
reservoir storage capacities. This study shall include in the
feasibility study analysis the project currently under
consideration by the Mokelumne River Forum and described in
both the Northeastern San Joaquin County Groundwater Banking
Authority and the Mokelumne-Amador-Calaveras Integrated
Regional Water Management Plans.
As authorized, this study is intended to be regional in
scope and shall examine the feasibility of providing additional
water supply and improved water management reliability to
Mokelumne River Forum member agencies through the development
of new storage and conjunctive use programs and projects,
including, but not limited to, the Eastern San Joaquin Ground
Water Basin, Pardee Reservoir, Lower Bear Reservoir, and Duck
Creek.
Fort Peck, Dry Prairie Rural Water System, Montana.--The
Committee has recommended $15,000,000 for continued
construction of this rural water project.
Middle Rio Grande Project, New Mexico.--The Committee
recommendation includes an additional $3,000,000 for additional
needs in the Middle Rio Grande Collaborative Program.
Truckee Canal Reconstruction, Nevada.--The canal breached
in January 2008, flooding Fernley, Nevada. The Committee
recommendation includes $2,500,000 under the Lahontan Basin
project for Reclamation to perform an exploration/risk analysis
of the canal to determine the full extent of rehabilitation
needed for the canal to resume flows above 350 cubic feet per
second.
Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin, Garrison Diversion Unit, North
Dakota.--Within the Committee recommendation, $52,000,000 is
recommended for rural water projects. Of this amount,
$26,000,000 shall be expended for the following projects:
$8,000,000 for the Northwest Area Water Supply; $6,000,000 for
the South Central Regional Water District; $4,000,000 for the
North Central Rural Water System; $8,000,000 for the Southwest
Pipeline. Additionally the Committee recommends $1,880,000 for
the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Irrigation Project.
Deschutes Project, Oregon.--Within the funds provided,
$750,000 is recommended for water conservation measures.
Oregon Investigations Program, Oregon.--$150,000 above the
budget request is recommended for developing appraisal-level
designs and cost estimates for on-reservation distribution
systems.
Northern Utah Investigations Program, Utah.--The Committee
has recommended an additional $300,000 for the Rural Water
Technology Alliance.
Columbia Basin Project, Washington.--The Committee
recommends an additional $3,000,000 above the budget request
for the Potholes Reservoir Supplemental Feed Route
Implementation.
Odessa Subarea Special Study, Washington.--The Committee
has provided $1,000,000 for this study.
Yakima Project, Washington.--$500,000 of the funds
recommended under this heading are for the Storage Dam Fish
Passage Feasibility Study.
Salt Cedar/Russian Olive Control.--The Committee has
recommended no funding under the 2006 Salt Cedar/Russian Olive
Control Act. Studies have shown that there is no water salvage
gained by eradication of these invasive nuisance species.
Without the water salvage component, there is no real nexus to
Reclamation's mission of providing water and power to the West.
The Committee agrees that these invasive species need to be
controlled and eradicated, where possible, due to their ability
to outcompete native vegetation. However, this mission is much
more suited to other Federal agencies than the Bureau of
Reclamation.
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project, Title I.--In
fiscal years 2006 and 2008, the conferees expressed their
concern that the Bureau of Reclamation was making excess
releases of approximately 100,000 acre feet of water per year
from storage in Colorado River reservoirs to help meet the
United States' Colorado River water quality obligations to
Mexico. The excess releases are being made because Wellton-
Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District's agricultural return
flows--that bypass the Colorado River and are discharged to the
Cienega de Santa Clara in Mexico (bypass flows)--are not
counted as part of the 1.5 million acre-feet of water that the
United States is required to deliver annually to Mexico.
Because the bypass flows are not counted, system storage from
the Colorado River has been used to make up for the bypass
flows. The Yuma Desalting Plant was originally constructed to
treat the flows and return a portion of them to the river, thus
reducing excess releases from Colorado River reservoirs.
The current drought and projected long-term water demands
have heightened concern about this demand on the river system.
Consequently, in fiscal years 2006 and 2008, the conferees also
directed the Bureau of Reclamation to dedicate sufficient
resources to the Yuma Desalting Plant so that one-third
operational capacity may be achieved by the end of calendar
years 2006 and 2008, respectively. To date, the plant is not
one-third operational, although Reclamation did conduct a
demonstration run at one-tenth capacity for 90 days in 2007.
The Committee, once again, directs the Bureau of Reclamation,
within the funds provided for the Colorado River Basin Salinity
Control Project, title I, to dedicate sufficient funds to the
Yuma Desalting Plant so that one-third operational capacity may
be achieved by the end of calendar year 2008. The Bureau of
Reclamation is also directed to provide the Committee with a
status report of the plant's operational status by no later
than March 1, 2009. If the plant is not one-third operational
by the end of calendar year 2008, the report shall include an
explanation as to why the Bureau of Reclamation has failed to
comply with the Committee's directive.
Drought Emergency Assistance.--The Committee has provided
the budget request for this program. Within the funds provided,
the Committee urges the Bureau of Reclamation to provide full
and fair consideration for drought assistance from the State of
Hawaii.
Research and Development, Desalination Research and
Development Program.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 above
the budget request to be provided to New Mexico State
University for research activities undertaken at or associated
with the National Inland Desalination Research Facility.
Title XVI, Water Reclamation, and Reuse.--The Committee has
provided $3,300,000 for this program. Within the funds
provided, the Committee has included $2,500,000 for the
WateReuse Foundation. These funds are available to support the
Foundation's research priorities.
Water for America Initiative.--A critical component of
reducing tension among multiple water users is collaborative
planning and joint operations. Within the funds provided, funds
are provided for the Desert Research Institute to address water
quality and environmental issues in ways that will bring
industry and regulators to mutually acceptable answers. Within
the amounts provided, Reclamation is urged to continue urban
water conservation projects identified through the Metropolitan
Water District of Southern California Innovative Conservation
Program; industrial water efficiency surveys to assess
opportunities to conserve water in industrial water use; and
for weather based irrigation controller activities to pilot
ways to speed distribution and acceptance of these landscape
water efficiency devices.
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $59,122,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... \1\56,079,000
Committee recommendation................................ 56,079,000
\1\Includes $7,500,000 legislative proposal on which Congress has not
acted.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $56,079,000
for the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund. The Committee
is aware that the legislation to effect a transfer of
$7,500,000 in Friant surcharges to a new San Joaquin River
Restoration Fund has not been enacted. However, the Committee
has provided the administration's full request and included
legislative text that would allow these funds to be utilized in
the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund. It is the
Committees' understanding that even if the legislation
establishing the new fund is not established, inclusion of the
Committee's legislative text would allow Reclamation to
undertake San Joaquin River Settlement Act activities within
existing authorities.
The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund was authorized
in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, title 34 of
Public Law 102-575. This fund was established to provide
funding from project beneficiaries for habitat restoration,
improvement and acquisition, and other fish and wildlife
restoration activities in the Central Valley project area of
California. Revenues are derived from payments by project
beneficiaries and from donations. Payments from project
beneficiaries include several required by the act (Friant
Division surcharges, higher charges on water transferred to
non-CVP users, and tiered water prices) and, to the extent
required in appropriations acts, additional annual mitigation
and restoration payments.
CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $40,098,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 32,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 42,000,000
This account funds activities that are consistent with the
CALFED Bay-Delta Program, a collaborative effort involving 18
State and Federal agencies and representatives of California's
urban, agricultural, and environmental communities. The goals
of the program are to improve fish and wildlife habitat, water
supply reliability, and water quality in the San Francisco Bay-
San Joaquin River Delta, the principle hub of California's
water distribution system.
POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $58,811,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 59,400,000
Committee recommendation................................ 59,400,000
The Committee recommendation for general administrative
expenses is $59,400,000. This is the same as the budget
request.
The policy and administrative expenses program provides for
the executive direction and management of all reclamation
activities, as performed by the Commissioner's offices in
Washington, DC, Denver, Colorado, and five regional offices.
The Denver office and regional offices charge individual
projects or activities for direct beneficial services and
related administrative and technical costs. These charges are
covered under other appropriations.
General Provisions--Department of the Interior
Section 201. The bill includes language regarding the San
Luis Unit and the Kesterson Reservoir in California.
Section 202. The bill includes language that states
requirements for purchase or lease of water from the Middle Rio
Grande or Carlsbad Projects in New Mexico.
Section 203. The bill includes language regarding Drought
Emergency Assistance.
Section 204. The bill includes language concerning the
Water for America Initiative.
Section 205. The bill includes language regarding the Rio
Grande Collaborative water operations team.
Section 206. The bill includes language concerning
expending funds from the Desert Terminus Lakes program for the
Truckee River Settlement Act.
Section 207. The bill includes language concerning
expending funds from the Desert Terminus Lakes program.
TITLE III
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Laboratory Directed Research and Development [LDRD]
The Committee recognizes the invaluable role the Laboratory
Directed Research and Development [LDRD] program provides to
the Federal Government and the Nation in general. Discretionary
LDRD investments have been and will continue to be responsive
to the energy needs of the Nation, as evidenced by recent R&D
projects in materials science, optoelectronics, computer
science, and high energy density physics. Cutting-edge LDRD
research provides the science base for energy-specific
applications such as fuel cells, hydrogen technologies, carbon
management, nuclear energy and solid state lighting. In
addition, LDRD is the national labs' most important tool for
maintaining the vitality of the national labs in support of
other national security missions. LDRD enables the labs to hire
the ``best and brightest'' young scientists and engineers and
allows them to seek innovative science and technology solutions
for current or emerging national security issues, including
those of energy security. LDRD investments have been effective
in providing solutions for today's energy problems and
demonstrate the inherent flexibility of the program to provide
national security mission support on a very timely basis.
Energy climate research needs can best be addressed by
continuing a vibrant LDRD program at the national laboratories.
Reprogramming Guidelines
The Committee requires the Department to promptly and fully
inform the Committee when a change in program execution or
funding is required during the fiscal year. A reprogramming
includes the reallocation of funds from one activity to another
within an appropriation, or any significant departure from a
program, project, or activity described in the agency's budget
justification, as presented to and approved or modified by
Congress in an appropriations act or the accompanying statement
of managers or report. For construction projects, a
reprogramming constitutes the reallocation of funds from one
construction project identified in the justifications to
another or a significant change in the scope of an approved
project.
Reprogrammings should not be employed to initiate new
programs or to change program, project, or activity allocations
specifically denied, limited, or increased by Congress in the
act or report. In cases where unforeseen events or conditions
are deemed to require such changes, proposals shall be
submitted in advance to the Committee and be fully explained
and justified.
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $1,722,407,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,255,393,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,928,259,000
The Committee recommendation is $1,928,259,000 for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, $672,866,000 above the
President's request. The Department's request for the Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy program is $467,014,000 less
than the fiscal year 2008 appropriation. The reduction is
driven by the complete elimination of the Weatherization
Assistance Program (-$227,222,000), but also reflects large
cuts to Hydrogen R&D (-$64,849,000) and the National Renewable
Energy Laboratories Facilities and Infrastructure
(-$62,194,000) subprograms. This Committee continues to support
a broad and ambitious research, development and deployment
program that covers a variety of technological approaches to
solve this Nation's energy problems. Our recommendation,
therefore, restores most of the administration's reductions and
increases some areas beyond the request. In addition, this
Committee recognizes that the Department may carry out
international cooperative agreements, including the U.S.-
Israeli energy cooperation agreement as described in the Energy
Independence and Security Act, section 917, as long as these
agreements are consistent with activities described in the
congressional budget justification. The Committee recommends
$5,000,000 to support the U.S.-Israeli energy cooperation
agreement.
Local Government and Tribal Technology Demonstrations.--The
Committee provides $50,000,000 and recommends establishment of
a new, competitive grant program that funds city government-
led, county government-led, and/or tribal nations-led
demonstration projects capable of reducing electricity demand
involving public and private partnerships. The Department shall
prioritize projects that have substantial local cost-share
match, that are replicable in the future under market
conditions after demonstration of cost/benefit advantages, and
that meet goals of greenhouse gas and/or water use reductions.
The Committee recommends that each project achieve at least a
50 percent reduction in energy usage. The Committee recommends
each grant not exceed $5,000,000 per project and the total
Federal share of each project be capped at 50 percent.
Hydrogen Technology.--The Committee recommends
$175,000,000, a total of $28,787,000 above the request. The
Committee agrees with the Department's proposal to transfer
several subprograms from the Hydrogen budget to the Vehicles
Technology budget in fiscal year 2009. With this increase, the
Committee's recommendation for all hydrogen programs in the
Department's fiscal year 2009 budget amounts to $296,500,000.
Of the increased funding, $22,000,000 is applied to
Hydrogen Production and Delivery R&D, which supports
development of hydrogen fuel from various sources such as wind,
solar, or biomass. While the program has used natural gas to
meet the 2015 production-cost goal, clearly that is not enough.
Renewable hydrogen remains a critical element of our future
energy system and our Nation's security. A total of $11,500,000
is provided for Systems Analysis, $3,787,000 above the request,
so that model validation refinement and analysis of selected
cross-cutting issues for multiple production pathways is not
deferred, as proposed by the administration. Finally,
$3,000,000 is provided for Manufacturing R&D, which is
$3,000,000 above the request. Manufacturing R&D must be
conducted in parallel with technology development to
commercialize new technologies through a domestic supplier base
as expeditiously as possible.
Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D.--The Committee
recommends $235,000,000, an increase of $10,000,000 above the
request. With the additional funds, the Department should
pursue development of biofuels from non-food sources,
especially those with the largest potential to sequester
industrial carbon-dioxide, such as algae, that are also
compatible with gasoline and diesel fuels. These biofuels will
be developed from a variety of renewable feedstocks, including
algae, that exhibit greater than 50 percent greenhouse gas
benefits compared to conventional hydrocarbon fuels. This
research should include demonstrations using brackish water.
The Committee also recommends that the Department expand
its Thermochemical Platform research and development to focus
on conversion of biomass to bio-crude, particularly upgrading
these bio-crudes to refinery grade feedstocks that compliment
the existing petroleum refining and fuel distribution
infrastructure. This expanded research and development program
is an important part of expanding research collaboration
between the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and
Washington State University, in a new Bioproducts, Sciences and
Engineering Laboratory in Richland, Washington.
Solar Energy.--The Committee recommends $229,000,000, an
increase of $72,880,000 over the President's request. A total
of $59,495,000 of this increase is transferred from the Office
of Science, Basic Energy Sciences program. The distribution of
the $229,000,000 for Solar Energy is as follows: $156,833,000
for Photovoltaic Energy Systems; $50,000,000 for Concentrating
Solar Power; and $22,167,000 for Solar Heating and Lighting.
Wind Energy.--The recommendation is $62,500,000, an
increase of $10,000,000 over the request. With the increase,
this office should work with the Office of Electricity Delivery
and Energy Reliability to develop better models and
transmission interconnection systems with the purpose of
increasing the ease of adding electricity from wind to the
grid. The Committee has provided a budget increase in the
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability program to assist
the Wind Energy program by providing support for the key area
of transmission, which is needed to take electricity generated
by wind power to the marketplace.
Within available funds, the program shall establish a
manufacturing initiative jointly with the Industrial
Technologies Program focusing on manufacturing issues for the
rapidly growing wind energy industry.
Geothermal Technology.--The recommendation for Geothermal
Technology is $30,000,000, the same as the administration's
request, which is already $10,182,000 above fiscal year 2008.
The Committee understands that workforce and educational
activities are critical to the future of the geothermal
industry, and the Department's future budget requests should
include funding for these needs.
The Committee encourages the Department to focus its
efforts on research and development of Enhanced Geothermal
Systems. However, we recognize that there is significant near
term crossover benefit for both the enhanced and existing
hydrothermal systems--for example, through pursuit of
geothermal mapping, existing hydrothermal systems marketers may
find new areas to place capacity.
Water Power Energy R&D.--The Committee recommends
$30,000,000, a total of $27,000,000 above the request. With the
additional funding, this Committee directs the Department to
accelerate the comprehensive resource assessment of water power
in the United States and accelerate the technology
characterizations, with the goal of completing them in fiscal
year 2009, 1 year sooner than projected in the budget. The
Department should also carry out the establishment of one
National Marine Renewable Energy Research, Development, and
Demonstration Center as described in the Energy Independence
and Security Act [EISA], section 634. The Committee recognizes
ocean and tidal power research efforts as identified in the
EISA and directs the Department, working with the Department of
Commerce, as indicated in EISA section 633, to utilize the
DOE's only marine sciences laboratory to undertake a research
and development program to expand marine and hydrokinetic
renewable energy programs.
Vehicle Technologies.--The Committee provides $293,000,000,
an increase of $71,914,000 over the request. Consistent with
the EISA section 641(g), the Committee provides an additional
$50,543,000, for a new total of $100,000,000, for vehicle
energy storage systems demonstrations aimed at developing
novel, high capacity energy storage, onboard management,
integration into electric drive vehicle platforms and the grid,
and new technologies and processes that reduce manufacturing
costs. These cost-shared demonstrations are to be conducted
through consortia. Another $15,000,000 of the increase is
provided to Fuels Technology subprogram, bringing its total to
$31,122,000. These funds will expand and accelerate testing of
intermediate fuel blends (15 percent-20 percent ethanol mixed
with 80 percent-85 percent gasoline) on vehicles, other
engines, and infrastructure components to provide data on how
these blends may affect materials, durability, performance, and
emissions and alleviate supply/demand imbalances. Work should
be done in coordination with the Biomass Program. The remaining
$6,371,000 of the increase is provided to the Safety Codes and
Standards subprogram to facilitate efforts in quantitative risk
assessment, component and system level testing, leak detection
technologies, and fuel quality R&D, for a variety of fuels and
technologies. Finally, the Department is directed to continue
research efforts in the area of computational predictive
engineering of lightweight thermoplastic polymer composites.
Building Technologies.--The Committee provides
$176,481,000, an increase of $52,716,000 over the request.
Commercial Buildings Integration is increased $27,000,000 to a
total of $40,000,000, for expansion of partnerships with
leading laboratories, universities, and DOE selected consortia,
consistent with EISA section 422.
Emerging Technologies is provided an increase of
$10,000,000, for a new total of $49,465,000. The entire
$10,000,000 is for solid state lighting research and
development. Residential Buildings Integration is provided a
$5,000,000 increase, for a new total of $31,900,000. The
increased funding will enable the program to move more quickly
into testing strategies that achieve a 50 percent reduction in
the energy used in a home. Technology Validation and Market
Introduction is increased $9,716,000, for a new total of
$34,116,000. Of this increase, $8,000,000 is for building
energy codes for continued assistance to States and the balance
of $1,716,000 is for expansion of the Energy Star labeling for
energy efficient and renewable technologies that deliver energy
savings and reduced emissions. The remaining $1,000,000 of the
increase is provided to evaluate models for accelerating and
advancing appliance standards and test procedures, specifically
evaluating international regulatory models that can be
considered for adoption in the United States.
Industrial Technologies.--The Committee provides
$65,119,000, an increase of $3,000,000 over the request. The
increase provides for organizing a cross-cutting manufacturing
initiative for clean energy technologies developed in other
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy programs, including wind
turbine gearboxes, carbon fiber and other lightweight materials
for automotive applications, sensors and controls, and other
technologies that benefit from improved manufacturing
techniques.
Federal Energy Management Program.--The Committee
recommends $22,000,000, the same as the request.
Facilities and Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends
$36,982,000, an increase of $23,000,000 above the budget
request. The Department is directed to use $12,000,000 of the
increase to execute an existing memorandum of agreement with
Sandia National Laboratories for supercomputing equipment and
capacity to support the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy-based mission needs.
Numerical simulation on high performance computers enables the
study of complex engineering systems and natural phenomena that
would be too expensive, or even impossible, to study by direct
experimentation. This resource will be located at Sandia to
take advantage of the more than 20 years of experience with
high performance computing hardware and software development.
The Committee expects both laboratories to contribute in their
respective areas of scientific and engineering excellence. The
remaining $11,000,000 is provided for continuing two
construction projects at the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory--$4,000,000 is provided for the Energy Systems
Integration Facility, bringing the total funding for the
project to $8,000,000; $7,000,000 is provided for the South
Table Mountain Infrastructure project, which is $7,000,000
above the request.
Weatherization Assistance Program.--The Committee provides
$201,181,000, a total of $201,181,000 above the request. Of
that amount, $200,000,000 is for weatherization grants and
$1,181,000 is for training and technical assistance.
Intergovernmental Activities.--The Committee provides
$50,000,000 for the State Energy Program Grants, $6,000,000 for
Tribal Energy Activities and $5,000,000 for Renewable Energy
Production Incentives.
Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $121,846,000,
the same as the budget request, which will assist the Office by
providing 30 new hires to fill critical skill gaps commensurate
with the technical workload increases to programs.
Program Support.--The Committee recommends $15,000,000,
which is $5,000,000 less than the request, but still $4,199,000
above the fiscal year 2008 enacted appropriation. The Committee
supports the program's efforts to enhance its Planning,
Analysis, and Evaluation subprogram and especially its efforts
to improve its Technology Advancement and Outreach subprogram,
but because of overall budget constraints cannot fully support
the request.
Use of Prior Year Balances.--The Committee does not accept
the proposal to reduce this request by using $738,000 of prior
year uncosted balances.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee includes
$124,150,000 for the following list of projects that provide
for research, development, and demonstration of energy
efficiency or renewable energy technologies or programs. The
Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing
requirements may apply to these projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algal-Base Renewable Energy for Nevada, Desert Research 750,000
Institute, Reno, NV for the development of algal-based
energy system..........................................
Alternative Energy for Higher Education, Creighton $1,200,000
University, Omaha, NE, for a solar energy project......
Alternative Energy School of the Future, Clark County, 1,250,000
Andre Agassi Charitable Foundation, Las Vegas, NV, for
a solar fuel cell system...............................
Alternative Fuel Cell Membranes for National Energy 1,000,000
Independence, University of Southern Mississippi, USM,
MS, for advanced fuel cell membrane research...........
Anaerobic Digester and Combined Heat Power Project, 600,000
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Montgomery and
Prince George's Counties, MD, for a study on anaerobic
power generation.......................................
Bioenergy and Bioproducts Laboratory, Auburn University, 1,000,000
Auburn, AL, to conduct research on biofuel conversion,
biofuel testing, and certification.....................
Bioenergy Demonstration Project: Value-Added Products 2,000,000
from Renewable Fuels, University of Nebraska, Lincoln,
NE, for research on the byproducts of biofuel
production.............................................
Biogas Center of Excellence, Michigan Economic 1,000,000
Development Corporation, Flint, MI, for a center for
the production of biogas...............................
Biomass Energy Resources Center, Biomass Energy Resource 1,500,000
Center, Montpelier, VT, for the installation of new
small scale technology.................................
Biomass Gasification Research and Development Project, 1,000,000
Port of Benton, Richland, WA, for the gasification and
research of biomass....................................
Biorefinery for Ethanol, Chemicals, Animal Feed and 1,000,000
Biomaterials from Sugarcane Bagasse, Louisiana State
University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, for a
biomass conversion project.............................
Bipolar Wafer Cell NiMH Lithium Ion Battery, Electro 2,000,000
Energy, Danbury, CT, to advance wafer cell battery
technology.............................................
Carbon Neutral Green Campus, Nevada State College, Clark 250,000
County, NV for environmental sustainability............
Center for Biomass Utilization, University of North 2,000,000
Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center, Grand
Forks, ND, for research on biomass production and its
byproducts.............................................
Center for Nanoscale Energy, North Dakota State 5,000,000
University, Fargo, ND, for nanomaterials research......
Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility, Vermont 1,000,000
Sustainable Jobs Fund, Montpelier, VT, for a digester
system.................................................
Chariton Valley Densification--Phase II, Chariton Valley 1,000,000
RC&D, Inc, Centerville, IA, for research on switchgrass
Christmas Valley Renewable Energy Development, Oregon 400,000
Department of Energy, Salem, OR, for the development of
a renewable energy-producing facility..................
City of Miami Green Initiative, City of Miami, Miami, 1,000,000
FL, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fuel
consumption in the city................................
Clean Power Energy Research Consortium, Nicholls State 2,000,000
University, Louisiana State University, University of
New Orleans, Tulane University, Southern University,
University of Louisiana, Thibodeaux, LA, for a joint
venture of Louisiana universities to promote
alternative fuels......................................
Clean Technology Commercialization Initiative, Ben 1,000,000
Franklin Technology Partners, Harrisburg, PA, to
support clean and alternative energy technologies......
Coastal Ohio Wind Project, Bowling Green State 1,000,000
University, Bowling Green, OH, for wind energy research
Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research, The 1,000,000
Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research, Inc., St.
Simons Island, N/A, to support university-industry
research and technology transfer projects..............
Cooling Heating and Power and Bio-Fuel Application 2,000,000
Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi
State, MS, to conduct research on increased energy
efficiency through the use of electric and thermal
delivery systems.......................................
Development of Biofuels Using Ionic Transfer Membranes, 600,000
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark County, NV for
biofuels research......................................
Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks, 1,500,000
University of Hawaii, College of Tropical Agriculture
and Human Resources, Honolulu, HI, for a tropical
bioenergy project......................................
Dueco Plug-In Hybrid Engines, Dueco Inc., Waukesha, WI, 2,000,000
for new plug-in hybrid electric propulsion technology..
Energy Production Through Anaerobic Digestion, New 500,000
Jersey Department of Agriculture, Trenton, NJ, for
anaerobic digester technology..........................
Fluid Flow Optimization of Aerogel Blanket Manufacturing 1,500,000
Process, Aspen Aerogels, Northborough, MA, for energy-
efficient insulation research..........................
Forestry biofuel statewide Collaboration Center, 1,500,000
Michigan Economic Development Corporation, Upper
Peninsula, MI, to improve the supply chain for woody
biomass................................................
Genetic Improvements of Switchgrass, University of Rhode 1,500,000
Island at Kingston, Kingston, RI, to improve
switchgrass for use as a biofuel.......................
Geothermal Power Generation Plant, Oregon Institute of 1,600,000
Technology (OIT), Klamath Falls, OR, for a geothermal
power plant............................................
Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy, University of 650,000
Nevada, Reno, NV, to continue and expand the Center's
activities in promoting geothermal power...............
Great Plains Wind Power Test Facility, Texas Tech 2,000,000
University, Lubbock, TX, for the testing,
characterization, and improvement of grid-connected
wind turbines and wind-driven water desalination
systems................................................
Hawaii-New Mexico Sustainable Energy Security 3,000,000
Partnership, Hawaii Natural Energy Institute,
Honolulu,, HI, to continue the analysis and technology
efforts of the Partnership.............................
Hollow Glass Microspheres, University of Nevada, Las 550,000
Vegas, Clark County, NV for hydrogen storage methods
research...............................................
Hydroelectric Power Generation, Quincy, City of Quincy, 500,000
Quincy, IL, for Quincy's efforts to install
hydroelectric plants at locks and dams.................
Hydrogen Storage System for Vehicular Propulsion, 1,500,000
Delaware State U., Dover, Delaware State University,
Dover, DE, to develop a hydrogen storage system........
Integrated Solar Energy Windows, PPG Industries, 1,000,000
Pittsburgh, PA, for the development of next generation,
transparent photovoltaic (PV) solar cells..............
Integrated Sustainability Initiative, University of 1,000,000
Nevada, Reno, NV, to promote campus sustainability.....
Kansas Biofuels Certification Laboratory, University of 1,000,000
Kansas, Lawrence, KS, for analysis of biofuels,
measuring emissions of biofuels, and research of
biofuel cells..........................................
La Samilla Solar Trough Storage Project, Sandia National 2,000,000
Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, for solar trough storage
advancement............................................
Landfill Gas Utilization Plant, County of Chautauqua, 2,000,000
Chautauqua County, NY, for landfill-gas power
generation.............................................
Lightweight Composites for Heavy-Duty Vehicles and 500,000
Hydrogen Storage, West Virginia University, Morgantown,
WV, to advance the use of lightweight composite
materials for vehicles.................................
Maine Tidal Power Initiative, University of Maine, 1,000,000
Orono, ME, to develop protocols that allow locations in
northern New England to be prioritized for tidal energy
development............................................
MidSouth/Southeast Bioenergy Consortium, MidSouth/ 1,500,000
Southeast Bioenergy Consortium, Fayetteville, AR, for
research on the byproducts of biofuel production.......
Multifunctional Solar Energy Systems Research, Utah 1,000,000
State University, Logan, UT, for research and
development of multifunctional electricity-producing
systems................................................
National Agriculture-Based Industrial Lubricants (NABL), 600,000
Biomass (IA), University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls,
IA, for the advancement of biobased industrial and
automotive lubricants and for biofuels services........
National Center for Commercialization of Bioenergy, 750,000
Kansas State University, Olathe, KS, for the
commercialization of near market bioenergy technologies
to meet national renewable fuel mandates...............
National Wind Energy Center, University of Houston, 2,000,000
Houston, TX, to focus on developing advanced offshore
wind technology for cost-effective, renewable clean
energy production......................................
Nevada Institute for Renewable Energy Commercialization, 500,000
Incline Village, NV, for the promotion of renewable
energy in business.....................................
New School Green Building, The New School, New York, NY, 2,000,000
for an environmentally friendly school facility........
North Carolina Center for Automotive Research, North 1,000,000
Carolina Center for Automotive Research, Jackson, NC,
to equip the Chassis Dynamics Laboratory...............
Offshore Renewable Energy, Rhode Island Coastal 700,000
Resources Management Council, Wakefield, RI, to develop
an Ocean Special Area Management Plan..................
Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing Center (OAEMC), 1,000,000
Edison Welding Institute, Columbus, OH, for an advanced
energy manufacturing program...........................
Oregon Solar Highway, Oregon Department of 1,000,000
Transportation, Salem, OR, to demonstrate the
feasibility of large-scale deployment of solar
photovoltaic technology................................
Pecos Valley Biomass Energy Project, NM, Clark County 2,500,000
School District, Roswell, NM, for a bio-methane gas
system.................................................
Placer County Biomass Utilization Pilot Project, Placer 1,500,000
County, Auburn, CA, for a biomass facility.............
Pope/Douglas Third Combuster Expansion, Pope/Douglas 1,000,000
Solid Waste Management, Alexandria, MN, to increase
waste to energy capacity...............................
Power Grid Reliability and Security, Washington State 1,000,000
University, Washington State University, Pullman, WA,
to create solutions for grid reliability and security
enhancements...........................................
Renewable Energy Clean Air Project, County of 700,000
Koochiching, International Falls, MN, for syn-gas
energy production......................................
Renewable Energy Development Venture, Pacific 2,500,000
International Center for High Technology Research,
Honolulu, HI, to expand potential energy resources in
the State of Hawaii....................................
Renewable Energy Feasibility Study, City of Trenton, 500,000
Trenton, NJ, to examine possible renewable energy
sources................................................
Renewable Energy Integration and Development, Clark and 2,000,000
Washoe Counties, Nevada System of Higher Education
(NSHE), Las Vegas, NV, for a renewable energy center...
Renewable/Sustainable Biomass Project, Alaska Village 500,000
Initiatives, Alaska, AK, for use of biomass for energy
generation in rural Alaska villages....................
Sandia National Lab Concentrating Solar, Sandia National 3,000,000
Lab, Albuquerque, NM, for concentrating solar
activities.............................................
Solar Panels and Environmental Education, County of 1,000,000
Essex, Newark, NJ, for the installation of solar panels
to further environmental education.....................
Solar Park Pilot Project, City of St. Petersburg, St. 1,000,000
Petersburg, FL, to develop a renewable energy plan for
the City's parks.......................................
Solar Power Generation, Township of Cherry Hill, Cherry 300,000
Hill, NJ, for solar technology.........................
Solar Thermal Demonstration Project, Clark County School 1,250,000
District, Clark County, NV, for solar technology for
schools................................................
Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative 4,000,000
Design, Mississippi State University, Mississippi
State, MS, to reduce emissions and posture the US for
less reliance on foreign oil...........................
Southwest Alaska Regional Geothermal Energy Project, 3,000,000
Naknek Electrical Association, Naknek, AK, for an
exploratory well for a 25MW geothermal plant to serve
villages in rural Alaska...............................
Stamford Waste-to-Energy Project (CT), City of Stamford, 2,000,000
Stamford, CT, to convert dried sludge into clean,
renewable energy.......................................
Strategic Biomass Initiative, Mississippi Technology 500,000
Alliance, Jackson, MS, to encourage bioenergy industry
in the southeast.......................................
Sun Grant Initiative, South Dakota State University, 4,000,000
Brookings, SD, for regional biomass feedstock research
and education..........................................
Sustainable Energy for Homes and Businesses, Vermont 750,000
Department of Public Service, Montpelier, VT, to
support Vermont's wind and solar program...............
Sustainable Energy for Vermont Schools Competition, 900,000
Vermont Superintendents Association, Montpelier, VT,
for school-based projects to highlight sustainable
energy technologies....................................
Sustainable Energy Research Center, Mississippi State 10,500,000
University, Mississippi State, MS, to develop new
engineering and scientific knowledge and serve as a
catalyst to create sustainable energy industries in the
southeastern United States.............................
Sustainable Las Vegas, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 1,000,000
Clark County, NV to increase conservation and
sustainability in Las Vegas............................
The Institute for Energy, Environment and 750,000
Sustainability, Johnson County Community College,
Overland Park, KS, to serve as a resource for local
education, business and civic entities and would
include education and training in renewable energy.....
Thin Film Photovoltaic Research & Development, Omega 1,000,000
Optical, Brattleboro, VT, to research solar panel
technology.............................................
Tidal Energy Study, Snohomish County PUD No. 1, Everett, 500,000
WA, for environmental studies of possible tidal energy
pilot plants...........................................
Transportable Emissions Testing Lab, West Virginia 1,000,000
University, Morgantown, WV, for mobile labs that test
bus emissions..........................................
USD Catalysis Group for Alternative Energy, South Dakota 1,100,000
Catalysis Group, Vermilion, SD, for the development of
metal oxide and carbon catalyzed reactions technologies
Vermont Biofuels Initiative, Vermont Sustainable Jobs 1,500,000
Fund, Montpelier, VT, to test the feasibility of
different uses of biodiesel............................
Wind Turbine Model and Pilot Project for Alternative 1,500,000
Energy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, for a shore-
side wind turbine......................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $138,556,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 134,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 166,900,000
The Committee recommendation for Electricity Delivery and
Energy Reliability is $166,900,000, an increase of $32,900,000
above the request. Of the increase, $10,000,000 is provided for
Visualization and Controls, bringing the program total to
$35,305,000, to accelerate the development of a resilient power
grid through inherently secure control systems and wide-area
monitoring tools. Additional funds help implement a national
wide-area grid monitoring system in support of the independent
system operators. Another $4,000,000 of the increase is applied
to the Energy Storage and Power Electronics line, bringing that
subprogram total to $17,403,000. The increase supports enhanced
efforts on power electronic activities. Finally, an additional
$6,000,000 is provided for Renewable and Distributed Systems
Integration subprogram, bringing the total to $39,306,000. This
funding supports renewable energy grid integration activities
facilitating increased deployment of renewables and other clean
energy sources to power our Nation. In particular, the
Committee encourages continuation of the electricity
transmission, distribution, and energy assurance activities
including the Modern Grid Initiative, and its Phase 2
Development Field Tests for the Allegheny Power Initiative, and
encourages the Department to continue research and development
in grid reliability and renewable energy integration at the
Electricity Infrastructure Operations Center at the Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee includes
$12,900,000 above the request for the following list of
projects that provide for research, development, and
demonstration of electricity delivery and energy reliability
technologies or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that
statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these
projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY
PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternate Fuel for Cement Processing, Auburn University, $1,500,000
Auburn, AL, to focus on the integration of the burning
process into existing kiln systems in Lafarge plants,
maximization of burn efficiency and minimization of
waste/discharge........................................
Center of Excellence Lab, Bismarck State College, 1,400,000
Bismarck, ND, to develop a state-of-the art lab........
Energy Development and Reliability, Bismarck State 300,000
College, Bismarck, ND, to promote and advance the
region's energy industry...............................
Integrated Distribution Management System, Southern 1,500,000
Company, Birmingham, AL, to provide seamlessly
integrated set of information systems providing all of
the major functionality needed to operate an electric
distribution system....................................
Iowa Stored Energy Plant, Iowa Associations of Municipal 1,500,000
Utilities, Ankeny, IA, for compressed air energy
storage project........................................
Navajo Electrification Demonstration Program, Navajo 2,000,000
Tribal Utility Authority, Fort Defiance, AZ, to provide
electric power to homes on the reservation.............
North Dakota Energy Workforce Development, Bismarck 1,900,000
State College, Bismarck, ND, for a workforce
development programs...................................
San Mateo County Solar Genesis Project, County of San 1,500,000
Mateo, Redwood City, CA, for a solar power electric
generation facility....................................
SmartGrid Integration Lab, Colorado State University, 1,000,000
Ft. Collins, CO, to demonstrate core smart grid
capabilities...........................................
Technology Development, Red River Valley Research 300,000
Corridor, Grand Forks, ND, to promote and advance the
research, development and commercialization activities
occurring in North Dakota's Red River Valley Research
Corridor...............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Energy
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $961,665,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 853,644,000
Committee recommendation................................ 803,000,000
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Committee recommendation for nuclear energy research
and development includes a total of $803,000,000.
Integrated University Program.--The Committee provides
$15,000,000 for a new Integrated University Program. The
Committee is concerned about the lack of stable support for the
nuclear engineering programs across the Nation. The Office of
Nuclear Energy's University Program has been repeatedly
restructured and elements of this program where moved to the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission last year. To be the effective
source of innovation and highly trained engineers and
scientists that the Nation needs, our nuclear engineering
programs must have sustained support for multiyear research
projects and modern curricula. The needs go beyond nuclear
energy with pressing shortfalls in trained professionals
capable of supporting crucial nuclear nonproliferation missions
such as nuclear forensics and international safeguards.
The Committee provides the Office of Nuclear Energy [NE],
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC], and Defense Nuclear
Nonproliferation [DNN] $15,000,000 each (for a total of
$45,000,000) for a new Integrated University Program. Of this
amount, $10,000,000 shall be used by each organization to
support university research and development in areas relevant
to the organization's mission; and $5,000,000 will be used by
each organization to support a Nuclear Science and Engineering
Grant Program. The Grant Program will be coordinated and
jointly implemented by the NE, NRC, and DNN. It will support
multiyear research projects that do not align with programmatic
missions but are critical to maintaining the discipline of
nuclear science and engineering. The Office of Nuclear Energy
shall provide a report to the House and Senate Appropriations
Committees on how the NE, NRC, and DNN will coordinate the
Integrated University Program and provide a stable source of
funding for nuclear engineering university programs.
Nuclear Power 2010.--The Committee recommends $241,600,000
to support the development of license applications for new
nuclear power plant designs under the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission's combined Construction and Operating License
process. This is the same amount as the budget request.
Generation IV.--The Committee recommends $70,000,000 for
the Generation IV nuclear energy systems initiative, the same
as the request.
Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative.--The Committee recommends
$10,000,000 for nuclear hydrogen research and development.
Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative.--The Committee recommends
$229,700,000 for the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative to support
the development of advanced spent fuel separation processes and
fuel fabrication technologies. The funds should support a
balanced portfolio of technologies for managing actinide
inventories utilizing both fast and thermal reactors. Improving
methods and capabilities for developing and qualifying recycled
fuels should be priority. Advanced materials modeling and
simulation capabilities should be utilized to aid this effort.
No funding is provided for grid appropriate reactors.
The Committee, consistent with the recommendation in the
Fiscal year 2008 Conference report, continues to provide
additional investment in laboratory facilities. Within the
available funds, $15,000,000 is provided to support upgrades to
Los Alamos hot cells and the materials test station, and
$15,000,000 to Oak Ridge to upgrade its radiological
facilities.
RADIOLOGICAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
Radiological Facilities.--The Committee recommends
$41,000,000, an increase of $2,300,000. The additional
$2,300,000 will be added to the ``Research reactor
infrastructure'' program for a total of $6,000,000 to support
university research reactors, including reactor instrumentation
and equipment upgrades.
IDAHO FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
The Committee recommends $119,700,000, an increase of
$15,000,000 to support nuclear research and development at the
Idaho National Laboratory. Funds will be used to support the
Advanced Test Reactor National Scientific User Facility program
at INL. These funds will support university and industry
related research programs and allow for capability enhancements
to support nuclear fuels and materials research. The funds will
also be used for maintenance and infrastructure investment to
support the INL mission as a preeminent nuclear energy R&D
laboratory.
PROGRAM DIRECTION
The Committee recommends $73,000,000 for Program Direction,
a decrease of $7,500,000. The decrease is based upon the
Committee's decision to put the Mixed Oxide Facility under the
Nuclear Nonproliferation program.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee includes
$3,000,000 for the following list of projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NUCLEAR ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technologies Ventures Corporation, Technologies Ventures $3,000,000
Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, for technology transfer
activities.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY
(TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
The Committee recommends the transfer of funds of
$149,000,000 in the Clean Coal Technology to fossil energy
research and development.
Fossil Energy Research and Development
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $742,838,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 754,030,000
Committee recommendation................................ 876,730,000
The Committee recommendation for Fossil Energy Research and
Development is $876,730,000, an increase of $122,700,000 above
the request.
The Committee believes that the Department has failed to
recognize and stress the importance of restoring a sustained
and balanced commitment to fossil energy research and
development. The Committee feels that the Department has failed
to fully recognize the significance of the Carbon Sequestration
Program as evidenced in recent findings of a panel of
scientific experts from the International Energy Agency [IEA].
The IEA validated that the Department's Regional Carbon
Sequestration Partnerships and their large-scale CO2
tests are the world's most ambitious. The Committee has
provided additional funding to sustain technology development
and to send a clear message that the Congress is serious about
making a long-term investment in fossil energy.
Clean Coal Power Initiative.--The Committee recommends
$232,300,000 for the Clean Coal Power Initiative. The Committee
is disappointed that the Department has underfunded its
commitment and thus delayed the current and future rounds of
the Clean Coal Power Initiative. This lack of commitment leaves
an even wider gap in the development and demonstration of
advanced clean coal technologies. These technology advancements
are critically important for addressing the existing fleet of
coal-fired power plants as well as the next generation of
fossil-fuel powered facilities. The Committee anticipates that
more than $600,000,000 will be available for the Round 3
solicitation and encourages the Department to proceed with
issuing this solicitation for carbon capture and storage and
innovative uses of carbon dioxide. The Office of Fossil Energy
is required to provide the Committee a status report on all
nine awarded projects for the Clean Coal Power Initiative's
Round 1 and 2, including completed and ongoing projects.
FutureGen.--The Committee recommends no funding for the
FutureGen account. The Committee has supported the technical
and scientific efforts behind the FutureGen initiative for the
past 5 years but does not support funding for the
``restructured'' effort this year. The Committee has instead
provided funds for the Clean Coal Power Initiative at a level
of $147,300,000 more than the budget request. The Committee has
distributed the remaining $8,700,000 of the budget request
within Fossil Energy Research and Development. The Committee
understands that $134,000,000 of unobligated balances remain in
this account and are set aside for future use with this program
but are not available until March 2009.
Fuels and Power Systems.--The Committee recommends
$412,132,000 for fuels and power systems, an increase of
$29,400,000. The recommendation includes $50,000,000 for
Innovations for Existing Plants [IEP]. The IEP program is
directed to continue carbon capture research for the existing
fleet. Of the IEP funds, $12,000,000 is for Federal
laboratories, in collaboration with research institutions, to
continue to conduct research and development on the critical
link between water and fossil energy extraction and utilization
and how different regions of the country can employ water
efficiency technology. In light of the new Clean Air Mercury
Rule, the Committee supports $5,000,000 in additional research
for a broader mercury program. The Committee understands the
Department has been moving forward on the Ramgen Compression
Initiative, and it is the Committee's expectation that the
Department fully complete the development and testing of the
Ramgen CO2 compressor. The Committee recommends
$63,000,000 for the Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined
Cycle activities and $30,000,000 for Advanced Turbines. The
Committee recommends $149,132,000 for Carbon Sequestration
activities. Additional funds are needed for the Regional
Partnerships to carry out the large-scale projects that were
awarded in fiscal year 2008 into field activities, in order to
accelerate wide-scale deployment of advanced clean coal
technologies with carbon capture and storage. The Committee
encourages the Office of Fossil Energy to continue research on
the co-sequestration of carbon dioxide and criteria pollutants
with other offices and agencies. The Office of Fossil Energy
shall be the lead office for these activities. Within available
funds, the Department is encouraged to study geologic resources
that have the potential to be regionally and nationally
significant in order to reduce data gaps. Within in available
funds for Carbon Sequestration, the Committee encourages the
program to continue to study carbon dioxide accelerated growth
algae technology to recycle carbon and produce fuels. The
Committee recommends $30,000,000 for Fuels to support both
fuels from coal liquids and hydrogen. Within available funds
for Fuels, the Committee recommendation includes adequate
funding to continue the integrated coal and biomass research
activity to address carbon emissions and technology barrier
issues. The Committee recommends $60,000,000 for Fuel Cell
Research. The Committee recommends $30,000,000 for Advanced
Research. Of this funding, $5,000,000 is for computational
energy sciences.
Natural Gas Technologies.--The Committee recommendation
includes $20,000,000. Of this amount, $15,000,000 is provided
for methane hydrates, and $5,000,000 is for research to
continue to develop technology solutions to minimize the
impact, or develop treatment technologies for produced water as
a by-product of natural gas production.
Oil Technology.--The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for
Oil Technology. Of this funding, the Committee recommends
$1,200,000 to continue support for the Risk Based Management
System, a nationwide database for oil and gas regulations and
technology developments. The Committee recommends the
continuation of the stripper well program.
Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $152,804,000
for Program Direction, of which $122,054,000 is for the
National Energy Technology Laboratory.
Other Programs.--The Committee recommends $9,700,000 for
fossil energy environmental restoration. The Committee
recommendation is $656,000 for the special recruitment program.
The Committee recommendation for plant and capital equipment is
$17,748,000, of which $9,848,000 is to be directed to the
Morgantown site, $6,900,000 to the Pittsburgh site, and
$1,000,000 to the Albany site. The Committee recommendation for
cooperative research and development is $5,000,000.
The Committee continues to support the Department's project
management efforts and the role of the National Energy
Technology Laboratory [NETL], with assistance from the Golden
field office, in setting up a successful Project Management
Center [PMC]. The Committee encourages the Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy to continue the collaboration
and funding of the PMC with the NETL.
Use of Prior Year Balances.--The Committee supports the use
of prior year balances in the amount of $11,310,000 from
completed or cancelled construction projects, the same as the
budget request.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee
recommendation includes $32,700,000 for the following
congressionally directed projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED FOSSIL ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arctic Energy Office, Arctic Energy Office, Fairbanks, $6,000,000
AK, for research in fossil energy, natural gas
technologies, and oil technologies.....................
Center for Zero Emissions Research and Technology, 4,500,000
Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, for research
related to carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas
emissions, and clean power generation..................
CO2 Capture/Sequestration Research, Pennsylvania State 500,000
University, Centre County, PA, to study carbon capture
and sequestration......................................
Fossil Fuel Research & Development, University of North 4,000,000
Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center, Grand
Forks, ND, to address strategic national energy issues.
Gulf Of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium, University 1,200,000
of Mississippi, University of Mississippi, MS, to
develop and deploy an integrated multi-sensor station
on the seafloor in the Gulf of Mexico..................
Long Term Environmental and Economic Impacts of the 500,000
Development of a Coal Liquefaction Sector in China,
West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, for the study
of the development of commercial liquefaction plants...
Multi-Year Demonstration of Carbon Sequestration in a 1,500,000
Deep Saline Reservoir, Xcel Energy, Denver, CO, to
determine the feasibility of geologic CO2 sequestration
in a deep saline reservoir.............................
National Center for Hydrogen Technology, University of 3,000,000
North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center,
Grand Forks, ND, for the development of hydrogen
technologies...........................................
Shale Oil Upgrading Utilizing Ionic Conductive 1,000,000
Membranes, Ceramatec, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, to
develop processes for upgrading oil shale, making oil
extract high quality and affordable....................
Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, Siemens Power Generation, 2,000,000
Pittsburgh, PA, to support development, construction,
and testing of the fuel processing systems.............
The Center for Advanced Separation Technology, 3,000,000
University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, to support
efforts to develop new technologies that reduce the
cost of separations in coal, metals, and industrial
mining operations......................................
University of Kentucky Coal-Derived Low Energy Materials 1,000,000
for Sustainable Construction Project, University of
Kentucky, Lexington, KY, to research alternative uses
for coal combustion byproducts.........................
Refining Capacity Study, North Dakota Association of 500,000
Rural Electric Cooperatives, Mandan, ND, to study
refining capacity......................................
Utah Center for Ultra Clean Coal Utilization & Heavy Oil 4,000,000
Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, to
continue research on the commercial viability and
validity of unconventional and clean energy
technologies...........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $20,272,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 19,099,000
Committee recommendation................................ 19,099,000
The Committee recommends $19,099,000 for fiscal year 2009,
the same as the budget request for the operation of the naval
petroleum and oil shale reserves. The Department is directed to
operate the field as close to maximum efficiency as possible,
given available funds.
Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $186,757,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 344,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 205,000,000
The Committee recommends $205,000,000 for the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve. Of these funds, the Committee directs the
Department use $31,507,000 to initiate new site expansion
activities and support beyond land acquisition, consistent with
the budget request. While the Committee has provided for the
operation of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, it does not
support any other expansion activities at this time.
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $12,335,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 9,800,000
Committee recommendation................................ 9,800,000
The Committee recommends $9,800,000, the same as the budget
request.
Energy Information Administration
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $95,460,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 110,595,000
Committee recommendation................................ 110,595,000
The Committee recommends $110,595,000 for the Energy
Information Administration.
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $182,263,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 213,411,000
Committee recommendation................................ 269,411,000
For the Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup program, the
Committee recommends $269,411,000, an increase of $56,000,000
above the President's request. The fiscal year 2009 program is
underfunded to the point even this administration has admitted
that, for the first time in its 20-year history, the cleanup
budget request is insufficient to meet its existing regulatory
compliance milestones. The result is non-compliance with
regulatory agreements and layoffs around the cleanup complex.
Thus, the Committee has had to significantly increase our mark
in the hope of avoiding those consequences.
Internal Reprogramming Authority.--In fiscal year 2009,
Environmental Management may transfer up to $2,000,000, one
time, between accounts listed below to reduce health and safety
risks, gain cost savings, or complete projects, as long as a
program or project is not increased or decreased by more than
$2,000,000 in total during the fiscal year. This reprogramming
authority may not be used to initiate new programs or to change
funding levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or
increased by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on
Appropriations in the House of Representatives and the Senate
must be notified within 30 days after the use of this internal
reprogramming authority.
The following is a list of account control points for
internal reprogramming purposes: West Valley Demonstration
Project; Gaseous Diffusion Plants; Fast Flux Test Reactor
Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning; Small Sites; and
transfers between construction line item(s) and the operating
budget within the same site, as applicable.
West Valley Demonstration Project.--The Committee includes
$72,900,000 for West Valley, $15,300,000 above the budget
request. The Committee provides the additional funding for
decontamination and decommissioning of facilities to reduce the
surveillance and maintenance costs at the site.
Gaseous Diffusion Plants.--The Committee recommends
$92,696,000, a net increase of $11,400,000 at Paducah for
completion of the Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion
[DUF\6\] facility. Within the funds provided, the Committee
recommends $34,959,000 for Paducah for operations and
$15,400,000 to complete construction of the Depleted Uranium
Facility at Paducah, for which the administration did not
request any funding. The Committee shifted $4,000,000 from
operations to construction activities and provided an
additional $11,400,000 to complete construction in fiscal year
2009. The Committee recommends the budget request of
$42,337,000 for the Portsmouth facility.
The Committee remains deeply concerned by the Department's
inadequate management of the DUF\6\ conversion facilities in
Paducah, Kentucky and Portsmouth, Ohio. Shortly after the
Committee authorized these projects, the Department estimated
that construction would be completed in 2006 and operations
would commence shortly thereafter. Despite the Committee's
action to provide the Department all the funds requested, these
facilities remain incomplete and behind schedule for startup.
The Committee is concerned that continued mismanagement will
significantly increase costs and needlessly delay the disposal
of this hazardous material. Within 60 days of this report, the
Department of Energy shall provide this Committee with a final
cost and schedule estimate, a description of how it plans to
meet that schedule, and how it plans to prevent similar
problems in future contracts.
Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and
Decommissioning Project.--The Committee recommends $10,755,000,
the same as the budget request.
Small Sites.--The Committee includes $90,060,000 for fiscal
year 2009, a total of $25,647,000 above the request. Within
this account, the Brookhaven National Laboratory is provided
$29,015,000, which is $20,582,000 above the request, to
continue decontamination and decommissioning of the Graphite
Research Reactor and the High Flux Beam Reactor. The Stanford
Linear Accelerator Center is provided $7,883,000, which is
$3,000,000 above the request, to meet a fiscal year 2009
milestone at risk due to the lack of funding in the request.
Moab is provided $32,578,000, an increase of $2,065,000 above
the request.
The Committee provides $459,000 to Argonne, $187,000 for
the California sites, $12,533,000 for the Energy Technology
Engineering Center, $4,400,000 for the Idaho National
Laboratory, $1,905,000 for the Los Alamos National Laboratory,
and $1,100,000 for Completed Sites/Program Support, all the
same as requested.
The Committee has again included bill language regarding
the Department's activities at the Energy Technology and
Engineering Center, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, in Simi
Valley, California. The Committee understands that the
Department is working toward, but has not finalized the
interagency agreement with the EPA as required in H.R. 2764. It
is the expectation of the Committee that this agreement would
provide EPA with all the funding necessary to begin the
radiological site characterization survey in fiscal year 2008,
and that DOE would continue its funding of the survey to its
completion, as determined by EPA. The bill language requires
the Department to provide EPA with the funding it requires in
fiscal year 2009 for ongoing work on the survey.
Uncosted Offset.--The Committee does not accept the
proposal to reduce this request by using $653,000 of prior year
uncosted balances.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee
recommendation includes $3,000,000 for the following
congressionally directed projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Initiative, The 1,000,000
University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, to provide
data management support for research in genomics and
metabolomic programs...................................
Southwest Experimental Fast Oxide Reactor 2,000,000
Decommissioning [SEFOR], University of Arkansas in
Fayetteville, Fayetteville, AR, for the decommissioning
of SEFOR in Strickler, AR..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $622,162,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 480,333,000
Committee recommendation................................ 515,333,000
Uranium Enrichment D&D Fund.--The Committee provides
$515,333,000, a total of $35,000,000 above the budget request.
Last year's budget reported that the site closure of the East
Tennessee Technology Park would be completed in 2010 rather
than in 2008, a 2-year slip. This budget now states that
completion cannot be expected sooner than 2015, a further delay
of 5 years. This Committee recognizes that this schedule slip
is solely due to lack of funding in the request; and has,
therefore, provided a total of $199,495,000, an increase of
$15,265,000, for the decontamination and decommissioning of the
East Tennessee Technology Park.
The Committee recommends $115,614,000 for continued cleanup
activities at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Paducah,
Kentucky. This amount is the same as appropriated in fiscal
year 2008 and $19,735,000 over the Department's request. The
Committee is concerned that the cuts proposed in the
Department's budget will harm cleanup efforts of the plant and
this report includes additional funds to accelerate the
decontamination and decommissioning of the C-410 building and
the West End Smelter. In recent years, this Committee has
provided funds above the requested amount, which have been used
to accelerate important projects such as the removal of 1,900
uranium tetrafluoride drums and the disposal of all outdoor
Designated Material Storage Areas. From the amounts provided,
the Committee recommends the Department continue to support
research activities designed to address pressing environmental
remediation problems at the Paducah site and provide objective
data and analysis to stakeholders such as the Department as
well as State and Federal regulators.
Uranium/Thorium Reimbursement.--The Committee recommends no
funding for this activity, the same as the request.
Science
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $4,017,711,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 4,721,969,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,640,469,000
The Committee recommends $4,640,469,000 for the Office of
Science. This is $622,758,000 above fiscal year 2008 and
represents the single largest increase for any program in the
bill. From within available funds, the Office of Science is
directed to retain the Nation's existing capability to produce
a wide range of isotopes including californium-252. Consistent
with the cost-sharing requirements of Public Law 101-101, the
Department is directed to develop a cost recovery strategy to
ensure the long-term viability of this program.
HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
The Committee provides $804,960,000 for High Energy
Physics. The Committee has long been a strong supporter of the
Department's space-based Joint Dark Energy Mission [JDEM] and
is pleased that the recent National Academy of Sciences' Beyond
Einstein Program Assessment Committee [BEPAC] judged this
mission to be the top priority. The Committee concurs with the
view of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel that
the cost cap recently announced may limit the scientific
capabilities assumed by the BEPAC review, and that an increase
in the budget beyond the current funding scenarios would be
justified. The Committee recommends the full budget request of
$10,030,000 for conceptual designs for Joint Dark Energy
Mission. The Committee recommends full funding of the Non
Accelerator Physics, University Research programs and includes
$3,200,000 for EXO 200, neurtrinoless double beta decay
experiments, an increase of $1,000,000 to complete construction
in 2009.
NUCLEAR PHYSICS
The Committee provides $510,080,000 for Nuclear Physics,
the same as the budget request. Within the available funds, the
Committee recommends $24,900,000 for the Isotope Production and
Applications program. The Committee has been frustrated with
the lack of cooperation among the various Federal agencies,
which has resulted in no Federal request to sustain this
important responsibility in previous years. The Committee
recommends $5,000,000 within the available funds for the
Research Isotope Development and Production Subprogram to
develop and implement a research and production strategy
consistent with the National Academy of Science study entitled
``State of the Science of Nuclear Medicine.'' In developing
this capability, the Department is encouraged to work with
researchers and commercial customers to develop a predictable
and reliable supply of isotopes.
The Committee directs the Office of Science to complete a
study on the feasibility of expanding the capability of the
University of Missouri Research Reactor to supply up to half
the United States demand for feedstock medical imaging
compounds in the form of molybdenum-99 and technetium-99. The
Committee also requests that the Department outline options for
preserving U.S. production of californium-252.
BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
The Committee provides $598,540,000 for Biological and
Environmental Research, $30,000,000 more than the budget
request.
Biological Research.--The Committee recommends
$423,613,000, an increase of $10,000,000 to support additional
investment in nuclear medicine. The Committee supports the
budget request of $48,500,000 for the operation and maintenance
of the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory.
Radiochemistry and Instrumentation.--A recent report the
National Academy of Sciences, Advancing Nuclear Medicine
through Innovation, recommended the enhancement of the Federal
commitment to nuclear medicine research. The Committee is
concerned that the Department may be looking to move this
research in other directions and emphasizes its commitment to
nuclear medicine medical application research at the Department
of Energy. Within the funds provided, $23,121,000 is for
Radiochemistry and Instrumentation. Of the $23,121,000,
$17,500,000 is for nuclear medicine medical application
research. The Committee emphasizes its commitment to nuclear
medicine medical application research at the Department of
Energy. All of the added funds must be awarded competitively in
one or more solicitation that includes all sources--
universities, the private sector, and Government laboratories.
The Committees support full funding for Testing and Low
Dose Research. The Committees also notes that diagnostics are
currently in development between the University of New Mexico
[UNM] and Los Alamos National Laboratory utilizing the unique
capabilities of Las Alamos National Laboratory at the IPF and
LANSCE and the radiopharmaceutical expertise of UNM at the
Center for Isotopes in Medicine.
Climate Change Research.--The Committee recommends
$174,927,000, an increase of $20,000,000 to support improved
climate modeling and monitoring within the DOE-NNSA
laboratories.
Climate Change Modeling.--The nexus of climate and energy
presents enormous challenges to our national security and to
our economy. It is imperative that the United States continues
to provide strong science leadership that guides policy choices
and technology investments. The Committee believes the DOE-NNSA
Labs are best equipped to develop and deploy a national system
for science-based stewardship that combines advanced modeling,
multi-scale monitoring, and impact analysis tools. These labs,
with their experience in nuclear weapons nonproliferation and
their unique capabilities across a wide range of technical
resources are best able to develop and implement this
comprehensive climate research strategy. The challenge of
certifying the nuclear weapons stockpile in an era of test-ban
treaties has produced one of the world's greatest computational
resources through the NNSA's Stockpile Stewardship program.
These computational capabilities have also been applied to the
development of sophisticated global climate models that can
assess climate changes far into the future. However, these
models are still too coarse to resolve the details of climate
change at the scale of watersheds or State boundaries, where
many public policy decisions are made. In addition, the models
do not capture realistically all of the complex physical
processes and feedbacks between the atmosphere, ocean, and land
where natural and man-made carbon fluxes are exchanged. The
Committee recommends an additional $10,000,000 to support
development of modeling strategies to support a comprehensive
modeling program and to focus on scaling global models to
regional scale to improve the predictive value of these models.
Similarly, more formal information science methods must be
applied to move from the current state, where predictions of
climate models developed by different groups are averaged over
a range of emissions scenarios, to a state where uncertainties
are systematically reduced for the most important variables
through deliberate validation and verification using
experiments to measure sensitivities and feedbacks. These
techniques have been implemented in the nuclear stockpile
stewardship program to provide much stronger confidence in
predictions for complex systems.
The DOE-NNSA Labs can also apply their expertise in
developing sensors and measurement systems to provide a
comprehensive assessment of global carbon fluxes. Improved
measurements must feed into models to depict the complex carbon
exchanges that occur between the atmosphere, oceans,
terrestrial ecosystem, and human activities at a variety of
spatial and temporal scales. A global system will require
remote sensing and in situ monitoring of atmospheric greenhouse
gases and other chemical indicators to allow attribution of
sources and sinks. Remote sensing includes satellite sensors
that can observe modest changes in greenhouse gases against a
high background signal. Methods to observe plume gas signatures
associated with carbon fluxes will be necessary to provide
source attribution information. The Committee recommends an
additional $5,000,000 to support research and development of
ground and space based monitoring.
In order to make informed policy decision regarding our
energy and water need in the future, the Committee encouraged
the Department to apply Laboratory expertise in consequence
analysis modeling using complex infrastructure data to assess
long-term energy impacts through linkages of climate change
with infrastructure. The impacts of energy choices are linked
to global markets, and to our financial, energy, electrical,
and transportation infrastructure. We must understand the
sensitivity of this complex system to different policy options
for climate change, including linkages that may lead to costly
unintended consequences. The Committee recommends an additional
$5,000,000 to develop decision analysis tools that can describe
this system at an appropriate level of complexity and
integration are required to give rapid insights at regional,
national, and global scales on long-term consequences of
investments at the intersection of energy technology and
climate policy. Because of the inherent sensitivity of the data
and potential vulnerabilities, this area requires capabilities
at the national security science laboratories.
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES
The Committee provides $1,415,378,000 for Basic Energy
Sciences. Of these funds $145,468,000 is provided for
construction activities as requested in the budget. The
remaining $1,269,910,000 is for research. Within the research
funds provided $17,000,000 is for the Experimental Program to
Stimulate Competitive Research [EPSCoR]. Of the decrease,
$59,495,000 of basic solar research is moved to the EERE solar
energy research and development program.
ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH
The Committee provides $368,820,000 for Advanced Scientific
Computing Research, the same as the budget request. The
Committee is concerned that the Department has limited
cooperation between the NNSA and DOE laboratories in supporting
the advanced computing architecture and algorithm development.
The Committee expects the Office of Science to continue to
support joint research through the Institute for Advanced
Architecture and Advanced Algorithms.
FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES
The Committee provides $493,050,000 for Fusion Energy
Sciences, the same as the budget request. The Committee
understands the Department's difficult decision to close the
National Compact Stellarator Experiment [NCSX] project. The
fiscal year 2009 budget request included $20,342,000 for the
NCSX. The Department is directed to reallocate these funds as
proposed by the Department to the Committee under Scenario II.
The Committee understands this means approximately $9,000,000
will be used for orderly closeout of NCSX, $9,250,000 will be
used to restore run times for three facilities and support
major upgrade work at NSTX, and $2,000,000 will be used to
enhance non-NCSX stellarator research. Recent advances in pulse
power have renewed interest in nuclear energy systems that
utilize both fusion and fission. The Committee directs the
Department to work with laboratories and industry to develop a
systems concept that identifies the challenges, opportunities
and future research path of such a fusion-fission hybrid
system.
SCIENCE LABORATORIES INFRASTRUCTURE
The Committee provides $110,260,000 to support
infrastructure activities, the same as the budget request. The
Committee reiterates its strong support for the construction of
the Physical Sciences Facility at the Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory [PNNL]. This project is funded through
three separate accounts, all of which have important national
missions at PNNL. Notwithstanding this unique funding
arrangement, the Committee expects the Under Secretary of
Science to take the lead in ensuring that the fiscal year 2010
budget requests are coordinated among all the parties, and will
be sufficient to complete the project in that fiscal year.
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY
The Committee provides $80,603,000 for Safeguards and
Security activities, the same as the budget request. The
program provides funding for physical security, information
protection, and cyber security for the national laboratories
and facilities of the Office of Science.
SCIENCE PROGRAM DIRECTION
The Committee provides $186,695,000 for the Office of
Science Program Direction. The reduction from the budget
request reflects the Committee's disapproval of the proposed
increase in funding for headquarters and the field offices. The
Committee supports the $8,916,000 for the Office of Science and
Technical Information.
SCIENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
These initiatives support the mission of the Department's
Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists program. The
Committee provides $13,583,000, the same as the budget request.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED PROJECTS
The Committee recommendation includes $58,500,000 for the
following list of projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SCIENCE PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antibodies Research, University of North Dakota Research $2,750,000
Foundation, Grand Forks, ND, to research and develop
antibodies for disease threats.........................
Bionanotechnology: Research and Commercialization, 1,500,000
Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, for
bionanotechnology and biofuels research................
Center for Advanced Energy Studies, Idaho National 3,000,000
Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, to conduct a pilot program
to demonstrate the Nuclear Science Talent Expansion
program................................................
Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems, Marshall University, 2,000,000
Huntington, WV, for disease detection and diagnosis
research...............................................
Center for Nanomedicine and Cellular Delivery, School of 750,000
Pharmacy, University of MD, Baltimore, MD, for research
Center of Excellence and Hazardous Materials, Carlsbad, 2,000,000
NM, for applied research...............................
Climate Change Modeling Capability, Los Alamos National 5,000,000
Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for climate change modeling.......
Computing Capability, North Dakota State University, 5,000,000
Fargo, ND, to increase supercomputing power............
Contrast Media and Wound Closure Reduction Study, 650,000
University of Mississippi, University of Mississippi,
MS, for efficiency in Iodine-based medical imaging for
diagnostic procedures..................................
Facilitating blood-brain barrier research, Seattle 1,500,000
Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, for cooperative re-
search.................................................
Former Workers Medical Surveillance Programs, State 1,000,000
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, for medical
surveillance, needs assessment and former worker
medical screenings.....................................
Functional MRI Research, University of Vermont College 1,250,000
of Medicine, Burlington, VT, to support MRI research...
Intermountain Center for River Restoration and 600,000
Rehabilitation, Utah State University, Logan, UT, to
continue researching river restoration and
environmental management...............................
Marine Systems Research, University of Massachusetts at 500,000
Boston, Boston, MA, for research into aquatic
ecosystems, marine biology, fisheries and mammal
sustainability.........................................
Materials and Energy Research Development, Tulane 1,000,000
University, New Orleans, LA, for environmental and
materials research.....................................
Matter-Radiation Interactions in Extremes, Los Alamos 7,000,000
National Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for advanced materials
testing................................................
Mind Institute, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 12,000,000
NM, to advance the understanding of mental illness
through advanced brain imaging.........................
Neuroscience research, Dominican University, River 500,000
Forest, IL, for research in to memory dysfunctions.....
Pioneer Valley Life Sciences Institute Biomedical 500,000
Research, Pioneer Valley Life Science Institute,
Springfield, MA, for research programs.................
Regenerative medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of 500,000
Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, for
regenerative medicine research.........................
Research into Proton Beam Therapy, Seattle Cancer Care 1,500,000
Alliance, Seattle, WA, to research new uses for proton
beam therapy...........................................
Sandia Nanotechnology Engineering Center, Sandia 5,000,000
National Lab, Albuquerque, NM, for nanotechnology
engineering activities.................................
Supercapacitors, Sandia National Laboratories, 1,500,000
Albuquerque, NM, for work to be done in Ostego, NY on
supercapacitors........................................
Sustainable Biofuels Development Center, Colorado State 1,500,000
University, Fort Collins, CO, to support research
efforts in alternative energy technologies.............
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Waste Disposal
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $187,269,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 247,371,000
Committee recommendation................................ 195,390,000
The Committee recommendation for the Office of Civilian
Radioactive Waste Management includes $195,390,000 from fees
collected by the Secretary which are deposited into the fund
established by Public Law 97-425, as amended, and $193,000,000
provided from the defense appropriation for a total of
$388,390,000. This total is $106,352,000 below the request.
The Committee directs the Department to exercise great
discretion to ensure that any work undertaken at or near Yucca
Mountain is consistent with the requirements contained in
section 113(c) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act and elsewhere
that no repository construction shall be undertaken prior to
the issuance of a repository license by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee provides
$1,950,000 for the following list of projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cooperative agreement between the Department of Energy $1,600,000
and Inyo County, Inyo County, Independence, CA, to
complete studies under the cooperative agreement.......
Inyo County Affected Unit of Local Government, County of 350,000
Inyo, Inyo County, CA, to conduct scientific oversight
responsibilities and participate in licensing
activities.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $5,459,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 19,880,000
Committee recommendation................................ 19,880,000
OFFSETTING RECEIPTS
Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$1,000,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... -19,880,000
Committee recommendation................................ -19,880,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $4,459,000
Budget estimate, 2009...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................
The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008 authorized the
Department to issue loan guarantees under title XVII of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 until September 30, 2009. The budget
request proposes to extend authorization for $20,000,000,000
for eligible projects other than nuclear power facilities
through fiscal year 2010 and $18,500,000,000 for eligible
nuclear power facilities through fiscal year 2011. The
Committee recommends a no-year limitation on the authorization
for the entire $38,500,000,000 for all projects.
Departmental Administration
(GROSS)
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $309,662,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 272,144,000
Committee recommendation................................ 272,144,000
(MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES)
Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$161,247,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... -117,317,000
Committee recommendation................................ -117,317,000
The Committee recommends $272,144,000 for Departmental
Administration, a net appropriation of $154,827,000. The
Departmental Administration account funds eleven Department-
wide management organizations support administrative functions
such as human resources, accounting, budgeting, workforce
diversity and project management activities.
Office of Inspector General
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $46,057,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 51,927,000
Committee recommendation................................ 51,927,000
For the Office of Inspector General, the Committee
recommends $51,927,000 consistent with the budget request. The
Office of Inspector General identifies opportunities for cost
savings and operational efficiencies and provides the
Department of Energy with the assurance that those attempting
to defraud the Government are apprehended.
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
National Nuclear Security Administration
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $6,297,466,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 6,618,079,000
Committee recommendation................................ 6,524,579,000
The Committee recommends $6,524,579,000 for National
Nuclear Security Administration Weapon Activities. This is
$93,500,000 below the request and $227,113,000 above current
year.
DIRECTED STOCKPILE WORK
Life Extension Programs.--The Committee recommends
$211,385,000 for the Life Extension Program, the same as the
budget request.
Stockpile Systems.--The Committee recommends $338,682,000
for the Stockpile Systems account, the same as the budget
request.
Reliable Replacement Warhead.--The Committee recommends no
funds for the Reliable Replacement Warhead.
Weapons Dismantlement.--The Committee recommends
$205,712,000, an increase of $22,000,000 above the request and
$71,037,000 over current year levels. Within the Operations and
Maintenance Activities, the Committee recommends $138,822,000,
an increase of $22,000,000. The Committee understands that
delays with the Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility [PDCF]
has created a 4- to 6-year gap between the time when PDCF can
produce feedstock and when it will be required for the Mixed
Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility. Within the available funds,
the Committee recommends an additional $22,000,000 toward
expanded operations of the AIRES line to ensure there is
adequate feedstock available when the MOX facility begins
operations. In addition, the Committee expects the NNSA to
undertake efforts to identify ways to reduce production of by-
product and waste material, lower the dose exposure to workers
and achieve operational cost savings. The Committee recommends
$66,890,000 as requested for the construction request 99-D-144,
the Pit disassembly and conversion facility, SRS. The Committee
strongly urges the Department to develop updated cost estimates
from the original estimates provided in 2006. Further, the NNSA
should analyze and report on whether more timely and more cost-
effective alternatives to the PDCF exist within the existing
NNSA complex.
Stockpile Services.--The Committee recommends $888,376,000
for Stockpile Services, a decrease of $43,560,000. The
Committee provides $10,000,000 for Pit Manufacturing
Capability, a decrease of $43,560,000. The $10,000,000 is to be
used to fund mission transfers from Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory to Los Alamos National Laboratory as proposed in the
request.
CAMPAIGNS
The campaigns provide the foundation for the experimental
science-based activities that support the NNSA Stockpile
Stewardship mission. Research supported by the programs provide
data that is used with the super computing capabilities at each
of the laboratories needed to support the life extension
program and to certify to the President the confidence of the
nuclear deterrent.
Science Campaign.--The Committee recommends $331,070,000
for the Science Campaign, an increase of $8,000,000. Within
these funds, $82,413,000 is recommended for Primary Assessment
Technologies, an increase of $8,000,000 to be used for to
support subcritical experiments and to support fielding and
diagnostics of Powder Gun, JASPER gas gun, the Borolo
experiment, and the ongoing series of Phoenix experiments. The
Committee recommends $28,734,000, to support the Dynamic
Plutonium Experiments an increase of $5,000,000 to support
additional experiments in order to understand the detailed
physics of primary boost by 2015. The Committee continues to
support the Advance Certification program to increase the
confidence in changes to warhead design to increase the safety
and reliability margins of the stockpile without underground
testing. The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for Advanced
Certification activities. The Committee recommends $29,418,000
for Advanced Radiography, consistent with the requested level.
The Committee is pleased that work on the second beam-line at
the DARHT facility is completed and it is beginning to produce
extraordinary experimental hydrodynamic test data. The
Committee recommends $79,292,000 for Secondary Assessment
Technologies as requested. Test readiness is decreased to
$5,408,000.
Engineering Campaign.--The Committee recommends
$162,742,000 for the Engineering Campaign, an increase of
$20,000,000. The Committee believes the Engineering Campaign
offers the best opportunity to explore, develop and deploy
state-of-the-art use control and surety devices to our
stockpile. The Committee has provided the resources to rapidly
develop innovative engineering solutions to support advanced
use denial as well as weapons surveillance sensors that will
allow for more accurate assessment of the safety and
reliability of the stockpile. The Committee recognizes there
are broad applications beyond on-weapons controls and
encourages the NNSA to look at other applications including
securing special nuclear material and nonproliferation
applications. Enhanced Surety is provided $45,641,000, an
increase of $10,000,000 to support research and development of
enhanced surety applications consistent with the 2007 JASON
Reliable Replacement Warhead study Recommendation 2(a) to
develop a ``physical understanding of enhanced surety
features.'' Weapons Systems is provided $17,105,000, the same
as the request. Nuclear survivability is provided $21,753,000
consistent with the request. Enhanced surveillance is provided
$78,243,000, an increase of $10,000,000 to support additional
research of micro devices that will improve the real time
surveillance of the existing stockpile, as well as other
security applications. Within the additional funds, the
Committee also recommends an increase in the University
Robotics program of $1,000,000 to be used to enhance the
request of $2,100,000.
Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High Yield
Campaign.--The Committee recommends $453,242,000 for the ICF
campaign activities. This is an increase of $32,000,000.
Ignition.--The Committee recommends $103,644,000,
consistent with the budget request.
NIF Diagnostics, Cryogenics and Experimental Support.--The
Committee provides $68,248,000 as requested.
Pulsed Power Inertial Confinement Fusion.--The Committee
recommends $10,920,000, an increase of 2,000,000 to support for
development of the Linear Transformer Driver concept.
Joint Program in High Energy Density.--The Committee
supports the budget request to fund a joint program with the
Office of Science to support joint research utilizing NNSA
facilities.
Facility Operations and Target Production.--The Committee
recommends $210,384,000, an increase of $30,000,000. Of this
increase $15,000,000 is for National Ignition Facility
operations and target production and an increase of $15,000,000
to support single shift operations on the Z machine and to
explore advanced concepts.
NIF Assembly and Installation.--$56,899,000 is provided, as
requested, to support this budgeted activity.
Construction.--No funding is provided for NIF construction,
consistent with the request.
Advanced Simulation and Computing.--The Committee is
frustrated by the lack of information regarding the computing
strategy for the NNSA laboratories in this budget. The budget
lacks specifics regarding the acquisition priorities and budget
to support new computing platforms. How computing time will be
allocated and the existing computing workload divided among the
labs remains unclear. The Committee requests that the NNSA
provide a written report outlining its shared computing
strategy to address these issues. The Committee expects this
strategy to have the benefit of an independent review and be
submitted to the Senate Energy and Water Development
Subcommittee within 6 months after enactment.
While the Office of Science supports a strategy to expand
its leadership in computing capabilities and capacity, the
Committee is concerned about the declining NNSA investment in
computing platforms needed to sustain the computing capability
at each the three national security labs. Advanced computing
capabilities are critical to each of our national laboratories,
enabling a wide range of programmatic activities. The Committee
has recommended new climate change modeling responsibilities
for the national labs, and computational modeling and
simulation will play a very big role in the success of this
program. It is imperative the NNSA labs have the capability to
support this and other missions. The President has requested
$171,000,000 for computational systems, which is $13,000,000
below current year levels. Even more troubling is the out-year
funding proposed in this budget which falls to an average of
$126,000,000 during years 2010 to 2014. This is nearly
$60,000,000 below current year levels and is insufficient to
meet our needs in the areas of national security, advanced
engineering, climate change, nuclear physics and biology, all
major scientific priorities for the Department of Energy and
NNSA.
The Committee understands that NNSA is planning to spend
$42,000,000 for the Sequoia system, although this figure is not
identified in the budget request. The total estimated cost of
this system is $142,000,000 for the base system with an option
for $35,000,000 for additional memory making it the most
expensive NNSA computer acquisition to date. The Committee is
concerned about the cost of this platform in light of the
declining budgets for the ASC program. The Committee does not
believe that the administration has requested sufficient
funding to support the Sequoia acquisition as well as upgrade
computing capacity at each of the labs and make the investments
in future platforms necessary to sustain advanced computing
capabilities at each of the three weapons labs. Prior to the
release of any funding for the Sequoia system in fiscal year
2009, the Committee directs the NNSA to provide a report
explaining the out year computing acquisition strategy and how,
within the existing 5-year budget plan, the Department intends
to fulfill the proposed capacity systems acquisition, upgrades
of the Red Storm system and provide for the acquisition of
future advanced computing systems. The Committee does support
the budget request of $15,000,000 to develop the new Zia
platform under the new memorandum of agreement between Los
Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories.
The Committee recommends $573,742,000 for the Advanced
Simulation and Computing Campaign, an increase of $12,000,000
above the budget request. Within available funding, the
Department is directed to continue to fund the Institute for
Advanced Architecture and Algorithms at $7,000,000 and an
additional $5,000,000 is to provide for operations of the Red
Storm system to expand it uses for national security problems.
The Committee supports the budget request for the Los Alamos
Roadrunner Computing platform.
Readiness Campaign.--The Committee recommends $158,037,000
for the Readiness Campaign, a decrease of $25,000,000. Within
these funds, the Committee recommends the tritium readiness
activities be funded at $71,265,000, a decrease of $11,000,000,
due to unobligated balances in this account, stockpile
readiness be funded at $21,731,000, a decrease of $7,000,000,
and non-nuclear readiness at $33,165,000, a decrease of
$7,000,000. The remaining activities are funded at the budget
request level.
READINESS IN TECHNICAL BASE AND FACILITIES
The Committee recommends $1,703,745,000, a reduction of
$21,778,000. This funding is used to support the operations and
maintenance of the NNSA laboratories, productions facility,
equipment purchases and personnel. Of these funds:
Operations of Facilities.--The Committee recommends
$1,193,907,000 for this account. This funding level reflects a
reduction of $19,000,000 from the proposed $37,687,000 increase
for the Kansas City Plant.
Program Readiness.--The Committee recommends the requested
amount of $73,841,000.
Material Recycle and Recovery.--The Committee recommends
the requested amount of $72,509,000.
Containers.--The Committee recommends the requested amount
of $23,398,000.
Storage.--The Committee recommends the requested amount of
$29,846,000.
Construction.--The Committee recommends $310,244,000 a
reduction of $2,778,000. The Committee has provided this
funding increase to make key investments in laboratory
infrastructure and security needs.
Project 09-D-007, LANSCE Reinvestment Project [PED], Los
Alamos, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $35,000,0000, an
increase of $30,000,000 to fund the refurbishment designs for
this user and experimental facility.
Project 09-D-404, Test Capabilities Revitalization II,
Sandia, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $3,200,000 the
same as the budget request.
Project 08-D-801, High Pressure Fire Loop, Pantex, Texas.--
The Committee recommends $2,000,000 the same as the request.
--08-D-802, High Explosives Pressing Facility, Pantex,
Texas.-- The Committee recommends $28,233,000 the same
as the request.
--08-D-804, TA-55 Reinvestment Project, Los Alamos, New
Mexico.--The Committee recommends $7,900,000 the same
as the request.
--08-D-804 Ion Beam Laboratory Refurbishment, SNL,
Albuquerque, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends
$10,014,000 the same as the request.
--07-D-140 Project Engineering and Design, Various
Locations.--The Committee recommends $7,446,000 the
same as the request.
--07-D-220 Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility
Upgrade Project, LANL, New Mexico.--The Committee
recommends $19,660,000 the same as the request.
--06-D-140 Project Engineering and Design, Various
Locations.--The Committee recommends $47,083,000 for
these projects. Of the amount provided, $8,500,000 is
for the TA-55 reinvestment project. For the design of
the Uranium Processing Facility $38,583,000 is
provided, the same amount as current year funding and a
decrease of $57,578,000 below the request. The
Committee does not believe the Department has provided
adequate justification to support the Uranium
Processing Facility at Y-12 and has reprogrammed
funding from this activity to other higher priorities
in the past. The Committee notes the Cost Analysis
Improvement Group has identified potential long-term
cost-savings by constructing the UPF facility at
another existing NNSA complex site. The Committee is
concerned the NNSA is not giving this issue vigorous
consideration.
--06-D-420 NTS Replace Fire Stations 1 & 2, Nevada Test Site,
Nevada.--The Committee recommends $9,340,000, the same
as the request.
--05-D-402, Beryllium Capability Project, Y-12 Plant, Oak
Ridge, Tennessee.--The Committee recommends $5,015,000,
the same as the request.
--04-D-125, Chemistry and Metallurgy Facility Replacement
Project, Los Alamos, New Mexico.--The Committee
recommends $125,000,000 for this project, an increase
of $24,800,000. The recommendation provides additional
funding to make up for funding shortfalls in previous
This facility allows for the consolidation of the
NNSA's plutonium analytical chemistry and actinide
research activities and replaces the exiting facility
which sits atop an active seismic fault. The Committee
is sensitive to the fact that the rising cost of
materials such as concrete and steel has increased
project cost estimates by over 30 percent for this
project. The Committee is also aware of the fact that
changes in the seismic requirements have required
significant design changes that include 4 foot thick
walls and doubling the thickness of the concrete slab
to 10 feet.
--04-D-128, TA-18 Mission Relocation Project, Los Alamos, New
Mexico.--The Committee recommends $10,353,000, the same
as the request.
SECURE TRANSPORTATION ASSET
The Committee recommendation for the Secure Transportation
Asset program is $221,072,000 as requested. This organization
provides an invaluable service is responsible for the safe and
secure transport of our nuclear weapons, weapons components and
special nuclear material.
NUCLEAR WEAPONS INCIDENT RESPONSE
The Committee recommends full funding for the nuclear
weapons incident response program. The committee provides
$221,936,000 as requested.
FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE RECAPITALIZATION
The Committee provides $163,549,000 for Facilities and
Infrastructure Recapitalization activities, a decrease of
$6,000,000 in operations and maintenance. This program was
developed to reduce the backlog in deferred maintenance of
aging infrastructure facilities throughout the complex. The old
facilities continue to be a drain on resources and should be
demolished or disposed of as quickly as possible.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS AND OPERATIONS
The Committee recommends $28,316,000 for environmental
projects and operations, a decrease of $12,271,000.
TRANSFORMATION DISPOSITION
The Committee does not provide any of the $77,391,000
requested to initiate the transformation disposition program.
The Committee agrees with the goals of the new program, but
notes with significant frustration that while the Department of
Energy and Office of Management and Budget managed to find
$77,391,000 for decommissioning and demolition of these non-
contaminated buildings under the NNSA's control, the two
agencies at the same time proposed hundreds of millions in cuts
to ongoing D&D work of radiological contaminated buildings
under the control of the Office of Environmental Management
[EM]. The EM controlled buildings are contaminated and present
a threat to human health and the environment. The
administration argues these NNSA transformation disposition
funds will lead to cost savings by decreasing hotel costs.
However, the same logic applies to the EM program. On balance,
the Committee does not see the logic in DOE and OMB's
priorities between these two programs D&D activities.
SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY
The Committee recommendation for the Safeguards and
Security program is $859,839,000 as requested.
Defense Nuclear Security.--The Committee recommends
$690,217,000 as requested.
Construction.--The Committee recommends $47,111,000 as
requested to support the following projects:
--08-D-701 Nuclear Materials S&S Upgrade Project Los Alamos
National Laboratory.--The Committee provides
$46,000,000 as requested.
--05-D-170 Project Engineering and Design, Various
Locations.--The Committee recommends $1,111,000 as
requested.
Cyber Security.--The Committee provides $122,511,000 as
requested.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED PROJECTS
The Committee recommends $3,500,000 for the following list
of projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University, Las $1,000,000
Cruces, NM, to promote prosperity in New Mexico through
economic development...................................
Electronic Record for Worker Safety and Health, 1,500,000
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark County to help
the Nevada Site Office improve responses to DOE worker
claims.................................................
Renewable Energy Planning, National Nuclear Security 500,000
Administration, Nevada Test Site, NV, for planning to
maximize renewable energy production at the Site.......
Restore Manhattan Project Sites, Los Alamos National 500,000
Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for historic preservation.........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Appropriations, 2008.................................... \1\$1,657,996
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,247,966
Committee recommendation................................ 1,909,056
\1\Includes $322,000,000 in reallocated prior year balances.
The Committee recommends $1,909,056,000, an increase of
$175,000,000 above the request and $251,060,000 above current
year levels. The Committee has restored funding for the Mixed
Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility as it continues to serve a
significant nonproliferation objective. The Committee
recommends a significant upgrade in the Nation's technical
capability to deal with proliferation threats by focusing
greater investment in laboratory capabilities and improving the
capabilities available to IAEA inspectors. Significant funding
has also been provided to accelerate efforts to repatriate
nuclear material from around the world and provide for its
secure storage or elimination. The Committee has provided
$15,000,000 to Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation to support its
participation in an Integrated University Program. The
Committee recommends $10,000,000 of this amount to be used to
support university programs in technical areas vital to the
nonproliferation mission, including nuclear forensics and
international nuclear safeguards. In addition, not less than
$5,000,000 of this amount will be used for grants to support
research projects that do not align with programmatic missions
but are critical to maintaining the discipline of nuclear
science and engineering.
NONPROLIFERATION AND VERIFACTION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Committee recommends $350,091,000, an increase of
$75,000,000 above the request. The additional funds will be
provided to increase our capabilities in proliferation
detection. Of this amount, $30,000,000 is provided to support
sustained, multi-year funding for detection research, including
investments in simulation and data analysis capabilities
relevant to the nonproliferation and international safeguards
missions. NNSA should take advantage of the significant
investments in advanced computing and algorithm development at
the national laboratories for its nonproliferation programs.
The Committee remains concerned that despite Congressional
direction, additional funds have been used to reinforce
existing efforts rather than to increase the Defense Nuclear
Nonproliferation's role in investing in core capabilities and
infrastructure. Within the available increase, the Committee
recommends $20,000,000 for a more effective nuclear forensic
and attribution capability. A recent American Association for
the Advancement of Science report concludes that our technical
ability to provide decision makers with critical analyses in a
timely manner needs improvement. Both our pre-detonation and
post-detonation evaluation capabilities must be strengthened.
We also have critical shortages in personnel with key skills
such as radiochemistry. Within the additional funds,
$10,000,000 is provided for nuclear explosion monitoring
directed at expanding nuclear explosion monitoring for very low
yield nuclear testing around the world. The Committee directs
the Department to utilize not less than an additional
$5,000,000 to competitively fund an integrated suite of
research, technology development and demonstration projects
including infrasound, hydroacoustic, and seismic technologies
for nuclear explosion monitoring. An additional $10,000,000 is
provided to support the Integrated University Program. The
Committee recommendation includes the request of $13,147,000 to
continue construction of the Physical Sciences Laboratory at
the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
NONPROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY
The Committee recommends $175,467,000, an increase of
$35,000,000 above the request and $25,474,000 above current
year levels. Within the additional funds $20,000,000 is
available to support the Next Generation Safeguards Initiative;
$10,000,000 to be available to support disablement and material
removal efforts in North Korea or other emerging threats, and
$5,000,000 to support the Integrated University Program.
INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND COOPERATION
The Committee recommends $429,694,000 consistent with the
request. The Committee has provided this office with
significant funding increases in the past and supports the
mission of this office.
ELIMINATION OF WEAPONS-GRADE PLUTONIUM PRODUCTION
The Committee recommends $141,299,000 consistent with the
request.
FISSILE MATERIALS DISPOSITION
The Committee recommends $528,782,000, consistent with the
budget request. The Committee believes the nonproliferation
mission remains the overall objective of this project and has
restored the funding to Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.
U.S. Surplus Fissile Materials Disposition.--The Committee
recommends $40,774,000 consistent with the budget request.
Consistent with the budget request, the Committee has included
$39,274,000 for the research reactor fuel project and the
reliable fuel supply project. By September 2009, the Department
expects to have completed the downblending of nearly all of the
17.4 metric tons of HEU for the reliable fuel supply program.
The Committee expects the Department to provide a written
report by the end of the fiscal year to update the Committee on
how the Department intends to utilize the reliable fuel supply
and under what terms and conditions this material will be made
available to other nations. Further, the Committee encourages
the Department to consider possible domestic needs as well
consistent with the fiscal year 2008 conference report.
Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility.--The Committee
recommends $19,200,000 to support operations and maintenance
including the development of the feedstock and testing of fuel
assemblies as requested and $467,808,000 for construction and
other project costs, consistent with the budget request. The
Committee understands that the deep cuts to the program in
fiscal year 2008 will increase the total cost and result in
delay in the completion of this project but encourages the NNSA
do its best to safely accelerate completion of this project.
GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE
The Committee recommends $284,641,000, an increase of
$65,000,000 above the request and $86,416,000 above current
year levels. Of the additional funding $20,000,000 is provided
to support the development of high density fuels to replace HEU
cores; and an additional $45,000,000 is provided to accelerate
the removal of proliferation sensitive materials from around
the world. The NNSA has recovered more than 16,000 radiological
sources in an effort to reduce the threat of attacks involving
radiological dispersion devices. While the recovered sources
are no longer needed by their previous owners, some may still
find useful application and could be used to reduce the demand
for new source material. We should look to maximize the
recycling of such material and minimize the need for foreign
imports. Using available funds a report should be produced on
the benefits and costs of establishing a process for the reuse
of recovered radiological sources for industrial or other
legitimate purposes.
Naval Reactors
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $774,686,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 828,054,000
Committee recommendation................................ 828,054,000
Through the Naval Reactors program, the National Nuclear
Security Administration is working to provide the U.S. Navy
with nuclear propulsion plants that are capable of responding
to the challenges of 21st century security concerns. The
Committee recommends $828,054,000 for the Naval Reactors
program.
Office of the Administrator
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $402,137,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 404,081,000
Committee recommendation................................ 404,081,000
The Committee recommends $404,081,000 for the Office of the
Administrator, the same as the President's request.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
Defense Environmental Cleanup
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $5,349,325,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 5,297,256,000
Committee recommendation................................ 5,771,506,000
The Committee recommendation for Defense Environmental
Cleanup is $5,771,506,000, an increase of $474,250,000 above
the President's request. The Committee is disappointed with the
administration's fiscal year 2009 budget proposal, which is
$167,000,000 less than the veto-threat constrained fiscal year
2008 appropriation. The fiscal year 2009 program is underfunded
to the point even this administration has admitted that, for
the first time in its 20-year history, the cleanup budget
request is insufficient to meet its existing regulatory
compliance milestones. In testimony presented to the Committee
this past April, the Assistant Secretary for Environmental
Management admitted this budget was as much as $900,000,000
short of supporting regulatory compliance milestones. The
result is a budget request that, if unchanged, would result
immediately in non-compliance with regulatory agreements and
layoffs around the cleanup complex. Thus, our Committee has had
to significantly increase, to the tune of $554,250,000, our
recommendation for the entire Environmental Cleanup program in
the hope of avoiding many of those consequences. We warn the
Department not to rely on the Congress to solve its legal
obligations in the future, and we expect a budget submittal
that is legally compliant in fiscal year 2010.
Reprogramming Control Levels.--In fiscal year 2009, the
Environmental Management program may transfer funding between
projects within the controls listed below using guidance
contained in the Department's budget execution manual (DOE M
135.1-1A, Chapter IV). If the amount of a single transfer, or
the cumulative amount of multiple transfers, between projects
within the control level exceeds 25 percent of the fiscal year
2009 appropriated level, the Environmental Management program
must notify both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees
within 30 days after the transfer. The Committee recommends the
following reprogramming control points for fiscal year 2009:
--Closure sites;
--Savannah River site, 2012 completion projects;
--Savannah River site, 2035 completion projects;
--Savannah River site, tank farm operations projects;
--Waste Isolation Pilot Plant;
--Idaho National Laboratory;
--Oak Ridge Reservation;
--Hanford site; 2012 completion projects;
--Hanford site; 2035 completion projects;
--Office of River Protection, tank farm operations projects;
--Office of River Protection, Waste Treatment and
Immobilization Plant;
--Program Direction;
--Program Support;
--Technology Development and Deployment;
--All construction line items;
--NNSA sites; and
--Safeguards and Security.
Internal Reprogramming Authority.--Since only a few of the
sites above have multiple control points to which the internal
reprogramming statute applies, Environmental Management site
managers may transfer up to $5,000,000, one time, between
accounts listed below to reduce health and safety risks, gain
cost savings, or complete projects, as long as a program or
project is not increased or decreased by more than $5,000,000
in total during the fiscal year. This reprogramming authority
may not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding
levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased
by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on
Appropriations in the House of Representatives and the Senate
must be notified within 30 days after the use of this internal
reprogramming authority.
The following is a list of account control points for
internal reprogramming purposes:
--Savannah River site, 2012 completion projects;
--Savannah River site, 2035 completion projects;
--Savannah River site, tank farm operations projects;
--Hanford site; 2012 completion projects;
--Hanford site; 2035 completion projects; and
--Transfers between construction line item(s) and the
operating budget within the same site, as applicable.
Closure Sites.--The Committee includes $59,383,000, an
increase of $13,500,000 above the request, to assure disposal
of the Fernald Byproducts Waste.
Hanford Site.--The Committee includes $1,020,564,000, a
total of $168,777,000 above the budget request. Of the
increase, $80,577,000 is directed to the River Corridor Closure
Project; $9,000,000 is directed to the stabilization and
disposition of special nuclear material at the Plutonium
Finishing Plant; $45,000,000 is provided for solid waste
operations in the 200 Area; and $25,700,000 is for remediation
of the groundwater and vadose zone. The Committee notes the
Department's continued support for the B-Reactor Museum and the
Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response [HAMMER]
facility, which are provided for within available funds at the
site.
Idaho Cleanup Project.--The Committee recommends
$465,124,000, which is $33,000,000 over the request. From
within available funds, $2,000,000 is provided to continue the
national spent fuel program. An increase of $18,000,000 is
provided for increased buried transuranic waste retrieval,
characterization, and shipping, as required by State agreement.
Another $8,000,000 is provided to avoid interrupting currently
mobilized decontamination and decommissioning teams which are
reducing Environmental Management's site footprint and cost of
operation. Finally, $7,000,000 is provided for the exchange of
spent nuclear fuel with the Savannah River Site, South
Carolina.
NNSA Sites.--The Committee recommendation is $346,084,000,
a total of $101,000,000 above the request. The Committee
recommends $245,467,000 for cleanup at Los Alamos National
Laboratory, $83,000,000 above the request. The increase is
necessary to prevent the site from missing agreed upon cleanup
milestones in fiscal year 2009. The Committee also provides
$75,674,000 for Nevada, $10,000,000 above the request, for
characterization and certification of remaining transuranic
waste stored at Nevada for disposal at the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant; $3,000,000 for the Sandia National Laboratory,
$3,000,000 above the request, for Landfill Remediation
activities per the regulatory closure requirement; and
$5,000,000 above the request for continuing decontamination and
decommissioning at the Separations Processing Research Unit.
Oak Ridge Reservation.--The recommendation is $255,000,000,
an increase of $17,330,000 above the budget request,
$13,330,000 of which will continue decontamination and
decommissioning of facilities ``owned'' by Environmental
Management at the Y-12 and Oak Ridge National Laboratory
complexes. The remaining $4,000,000 will be used for TSCA
Operations through fiscal year 2009 to support Paducah and
Portsmouth cleanup efforts.
Office of River Protection.--The Committee provides
$1,031,443,000, an increase of $53,000,000 above the request.
The entire increase is for supplemental treatment activities
and single shell tank retrievals in the tank farms. The Waste
Treatment and Immobilization Plant is fully supported at
$690,000,000.
Savannah River Site.--The Committee includes
$1,264,961,000, an increase of $58,536,000 above the budget
request. The additional funding will complete Transuranic waste
drum shipments to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant; provide for
groundwater cleanup (+$11,692,000) and decontamination and
decommissioning (+$35,344,000), for packaging special nuclear
materials (+$8,000,000) for long term storage; and preparing
spent nuclear fuel for exchange with Idaho ($3,500,000).
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant [WIPP].--The recommendation is
$231,661,000 for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The increase
of $20,137,000 maintains the fiscal year 2008 level of
transuranic waste shipments and receipts at this site.
Program Direction.--The Committee includes $308,765,000,
the same as the requested amount.
Program Support.--The Committee includes $33,930,000, the
same as the request.
Safeguards and Security.--The Committee recommends
$260,341,000. The $9,000,000 increase is for security upgrades
at the Canister Storage Building in Hanford, Washington, for
special nuclear material that will not be shipped offsite to
South Carolina.
Technology Development and Deployment.--The Committee
provides $22,250,000.
Federal Contribution to Uranium Enrichment Decontamination
and Decommissioning Fund.--The recommendation is $463,000,000,
the same as the request.
Uncosted Offset.--The Committee does not accept the
proposal to reduce this request by using $1,109,000 of prior
year uncosted balances.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee includes
$9,000,000 for the following list of projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Characteristics and Clean-up of U.S. Nuclear Legacy, $4,000,000
Institute for Clean Energy Technology, Mississippi
State, MS, for renewal of the cooperative agreement
with the DOE to help expedite the cleanup of the
nuclear defense sites..................................
Water Resources Data, Modeling, and Visualization 1,000,000
Center, Desert Research Institute, Washoe County, NV
for water research.....................................
WIPP Records Archive, WIPP, Carlsbad, NM, for records 4,000,000
archiving..............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Defense Activities
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $754,359,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,335,996,000
Committee recommendation................................ 827,503,000
The Committee recommendation is $827,503,000, for Other
Defense Activities, the same as requested, with the exception
of the MOX construction project, which is funded under the
Nuclear Nonproliferation program. This amount is sufficient to
provide for the Office of Health, Safety and Security
($447,918,000), the Office of Legacy Management ($185,981,000),
Safeguards and Security for Nuclear Energy's Idaho Site
($78,811,000), Defense Related Administrative Support, which
contributes its share toward the Department's administrative
costs ($108,190,000), and the Office of Hearings and Appeals
($6,603,000).
The Committee concurs with the budgetary change proposed by
the Office of Legacy Management to consolidate its mission
funding under a single appropriation. This consolidation leads
to efficiencies in managing the approximately 80 former
research and production sites, and administering the pension
and benefit plans for retired cold war employees.
The Committee also concurs with the change in policy for
Nuclear Energy's Safeguards and Security Reimbursable Work,
which again can lead to efficiencies in managing and executing
the program.
Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committed
recommends $1,050,000 for the following list of projects.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Project recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and $1,050,000
Oak Ridge, TN, Paducah, Portsmouth, and Oak Ridge
Medical Monitoring, Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and
Oak Ridge, TN, to provide for continued conventional
medical work-ups and lung scans and re-scans for
current and former workers.............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $199,171,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 247,371,000
Committee recommendation................................ 193,000,000
The Committee recommendation for Defense Nuclear Waste
Disposal under the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste
Management is $193,000,000. Along with $195,390,000 from fees
collected by the Secretary which are deposited into the fund
established by Public Law 97-425, as amended, the Committee
provides a total of $388,390,000 for fiscal year 2009.
Power Marketing Administrations
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
The Bonneville Power Administration is the Department of
Energy's marketing agency for electric power in the Pacific
Northwest. Bonneville provides electricity to a 300,000 square
mile service area in the Columbia River drainage basin.
Bonneville markets the power from Federal hydropower projects
in the Northwest, as well as power from non-Federal generating
facilities in the region. Bonneville also exchanges and markets
surplus power with Canada and California. The Committee
recommends no new borrowing authority for BPA during fiscal
year 2009.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $6,404,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 7,420,000
Committee recommendation................................ 7,420,000
For the Southeastern Power Administration, the Committee
recommends $7,420,000, the same as the budget request. The
Committee provides $63,522,000 for purchase power and wheeling.
The Southeastern Power Administration markets hydroelectric
power produced at Corps of Engineers projects in 11
Southeastern States. Southeastern does not own or operate any
transmission facilities and carries out its marketing program
by utilizing the existing transmission systems of the power
utilities in the area. This is accomplished through
transmission arrangements between Southeastern and each of the
area utilities with transmission lines connected to the
projects. The utility agrees to deliver specified amounts of
Federal power to customers of the Government, and Southeastern
agrees to compensate the utility for the wheeling service
performed.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $30,165,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 28,414,000
Committee recommendation................................ 28,414,000
For the Southwestern Power Administration, the Committee
recommends $28,414,000, the same as the budget request. The
Committee provides $46,000,000 for purchase power and wheeling.
The Southwestern Power Administration is the marketing
agent for the power generated at the Corps of Engineers'
hydroelectric plants in the six State area of Kansas, Oklahoma,
Texas, Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana, with a total
installed capacity of 2,158 megawatts. It operates and
maintains some 1,380 miles of transmission lines, 24 generating
projects, and 24 substations, and sells its power at wholesale,
primarily to publicly and cooperatively-owned electric
distribution utilities.
CONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, WESTERN AREA
POWER ADMINISTRATION
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $228,907,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 193,346,000
Committee recommendation................................ 218,346,000
The Western Power Administration is responsible for
marketing the electric power generated by the Bureau of
Reclamation, the Corps of Engineers, and the International
Boundary and Water Commission. Western also operates and
maintains a system of transmission lines nearly 17,000 miles
long, providing electricity to 15 Central and Western States
over a service area of 1.3 million square miles.
The Committee notes that Western Area Power Administration
funding for Construction, Rehabilitation, Operations and
Maintenance is significantly reduced from prior levels. The
budget proposes to offset this reduction by a far greater
reliance on use of alternative financing. While direct customer
financing is well established there are limits on the
availability of this alternative financing mechanism. The
Committee is concerned that continued reductions in Western's
construction program could impair the reliability of the
transmission systems.
The Committee recommends $218,346,000 for the Western Area
Power Administration. The total program level for Western in
fiscal year 2009 is $901,634,000, which includes $74,544,000
for construction and rehabilitation, $52,365,000 for system
power operation and maintenance, $600,960,000 for purchase
power and wheeling, and $166,423,000 for program direction. The
Committee recommendation includes $7,342,000 for the Utah
Mitigation and Conservation Fund.
Offsetting collections total $406,484,000; with the use of
$3,366,000 of offsetting collections from the Colorado River
Dam Fund (as authorized in Public Law 98-381), this requires a
net appropriation of $218,346,000.
An increase in purchase power and wheeling use of receipt
authority of $75,000,000, over and above the request of
$328,100,000, is needed to provide for increases in cost of
power, continuing drought conditions, and for certain
unforeseen charges.
FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $2,477,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 2,959,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,959,000
The Falcon Dam and Amistad Dam on the Rio Grande River
generate power through hydroelectric facilities and sell this
power to public utilities through the Western Power
Administration. This fund, created in the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995, defrays the
costs of operation, maintenance, and emergency activities and
is administered by the Western Area Power Administration. For
the Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund, the
Committee recommends $2,959,000 the same as the request.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $260,425,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 273,400,000
Committee recommendation................................ 273,400,000
REVENUES APPLIED
Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$260,425,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... -273,400,000
Committee recommendation................................ -273,400,000
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee recommendation
Committee compared to--
Revised enacted Budget estimate recommendation ---------------------------------
Revised enacted Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D:
Local Government and Tribal technology demonstration........... ............... ............... 50,000 +50,000 +50,000
Hydrogen Technology........................................ 211,062 146,213 175,000 -36,062 +28,787
Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D........................ 198,180 225,000 235,000 +36,820 +10,000
Solar energy............................................... 168,453 156,120 229,000 +60,547 +72,880
Wind energy................................................ 49,545 52,500 62,500 +12,955 +10,000
Geothermal technology...................................... 19,818 30,000 30,000 +10,182 ...............
Water Power Energy......................................... 9,909 3,000 30,000 +20,091 +27,000
Vehicle technologies....................................... 213,043 221,086 293,000 +79,957 +71,914
Building technologies...................................... 108,999 123,765 176,481 +67,482 +52,716
Industrial technologies.................................... 64,408 62,119 65,119 +711 +3,000
Federal energy management program.......................... 19,818 22,000 22,000 +2,182 ...............
Facilities and infrastructure:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL]............ 6,918 9,982 21,982 +15,064 +12,000
NREL Solar equipment recapitalization.................. 7,927 ............... ............... -7,927 ...............
Construction:
08-EE-02 South-table mountain site infrastructure 6,831 ............... 7,000 +169 +7,000
development, National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
Golden, Co........................................
08-EE-01 Energy systems integration facility, 54,500 4,000 8,000 -46,500 +4,000
National Renewal Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction......................... 61,331 4,000 15,000 -46,331 +11,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Facilities and infrastructure........ 76,176 13,982 36,982 -39,194 +23,000
Program direction.......................................... 104,057 121,846 121,846 +17,789 ...............
Program support............................................ 10,801 20,000 15,000 +4,199 -5,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D... 1,254,269 1,197,631 1,541,928 +287,659 +344,297
Federal energy assistance:
Weatherization assistance...................................... 222,713 ............... 200,000 -22,713 +200,000
Training and technical assistance.............................. 4,509 ............... 1,181 -3,328 +1,181
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Weatherization..................................... 227,222 ............... 201,181 -26,041 +201,181
Other:
State energy program....................................... 44,095 50,000 50,000 +5,905 ...............
International renewable energy program..................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Tribal energy activities................................... 5,945 1,000 6,000 +55 +5,000
Renewable energy production incentive...................... 4,955 ............... 5,000 +45 +5,000
Asia pacific............................................... ............... 7,500 ............... ............... -7,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Other.......................................... 54,995 58,500 61,000 +6,005 +2,500
Subtotal, Federal energy assistance...................... 282,217 58,500 262,181 -20,036 +203,681
Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -738 ............... ............... +738
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 185,921 ............... 124,150 -61,771 +124,150
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY................. 1,722,407 1,255,393 1,928,259 +205,852 +672,866
====================================================================================
ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY
Research and development:
High temperature superconductivity R&D......................... 27,930 28,186 28,186 +256 ...............
Visualization and controls................................. 25,075 25,305 35,305 +10,230 +10,000
Energy storage and power electronics....................... 6,741 13,403 17,403 +10,662 +4,000
Renewable and distributed systems integration.............. 25,466 33,306 39,306 +13,840 +6,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Research and development....................... 85,212 100,200 120,200 +34,988 +20,000
Operations and analysis............................................ 11,451 14,122 14,122 +2,671 ...............
Program direction.................................................. 17,603 19,678 19,678 +2,075 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.............................. 24,290 ............... 12,900 -11,390 +12,900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY........... 138,556 134,000 166,900 +28,344 +32,900
====================================================================================
NUCLEAR ENERGY
Research and development:
Integrated University program.................................. ............... ............... 15,000 +15,000 +15,000
Nuclear power 2010............................................. 133,771 241,600 241,600 +107,829 ...............
Generation IV nuclear energy systems initiative................ 114,917 70,000 70,000 -44,917 ...............
Nuclear hydrogen initiative.................................... 9,909 16,600 10,000 +91 -6,600
Advanced fuel cycle initiative................................. 179,353 301,500 229,700 +50,347 -71,800
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Research and development........................... 437,950 629,700 566,300 +128,350 -63,400
Infrastructure:
Radiological facilities management:
Space and defense infrastructure........................... 30,371 35,000 35,000 +4,629 ...............
Medical isotopes infrastructure............................ 14,828 ............... ............... -14,828 ...............
Research reactor infrastructure............................ 2,920 3,700 6,000 +3,080 +2,300
Oak Ridge nuclear infrastructure........................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Radiological facilities management............. 48,119 38,700 41,000 -7,119 +2,300
INL infrastructure:
INL Operations and infrastructure.......................... 115,935 104,700 119,700 +3,765 +15,000
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security..................... 75,261 78,811 78,811 +3,550 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, INL Infrastructure............................. 239,315 222,211 239,511 +196 +17,300
Program direction.................................................. 80,872 80,544 73,000 -7,872 -7,544
Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Nuclear Energy..................................... 758,137 932,455 878,811 +120,674 -53,644
====================================================================================
Funding from other defense activities.............................. -75,261 -78,811 -78,811 -3,550 ...............
Congressional directed projects.................................... ............... ............... 3,000 +3,000 +3,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY........................................ 682,876 853,644 803,000 +120,124 -50,644
====================================================================================
OFFICE OF LEGACY MANAGEMENT
Legacy management.................................................. 33,872 ............... ............... -33,872 ...............
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY
Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2008................. 257,000 ............... ............... -257,000 ...............
Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2009................. -149,000 149,000 149,000 +298,000 ...............
Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D [CCPI]............................... -69,363 ............... ............... +69,363 ...............
Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D [CCDI]............................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D...................................... -74,317 -149,000 -149,000 -74,683 ...............
Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D (Fuels & Power Systems).............. -20,809 ............... ............... +20,809 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY................................. -56,489 ............... ............... +56,489 ...............
====================================================================================
FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Clean coal power initiative........................................ 69,363 85,000 232,300 +162,937 +147,300
FutureGen.......................................................... 74,317 156,000 ............... -74,317 -156,000
Fuels and Power Systems:
Innovations for existing plants................................ 36,081 40,000 50,000 +13,919 +10,000
Advanced integrated gasification combined cycle................ 53,509 69,000 63,000 +9,491 -6,000
Advanced turbines.............................................. 23,782 28,000 30,000 +6,218 +2,000
Carbon sequestration........................................... 118,908 149,132 149,132 +30,224 ...............
Fuels.......................................................... 24,773 10,000 30,000 +5,227 +20,000
Fuel cells..................................................... 55,490 60,000 60,000 +4,510 ...............
Advanced research.............................................. 37,159 26,600 30,000 -7,159 +3,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Fuels and power systems............................ 349,702 382,732 412,132 +62,430 +29,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Coal............................................... 493,382 623,732 644,432 +151,050 +20,700
Natural Gas Technologies........................................... 19,818 ............... 20,000 +182 +20,000
Petroleum--Oil Technologies........................................ 4,954 ............... 5,000 +46 +5,000
Program direction.................................................. 148,597 126,252 152,804 +4,207 +26,552
Plant and Capital Equipment........................................ 12,882 5,000 17,748 +4,866 +12,748
Fossil energy environmental restoration............................ 9,483 9,700 9,700 +217 ...............
Special recruitment programs....................................... 650 656 656 +6 ...............
Cooperative research and development............................... 4,954 ............... 5,000 +46 +5,000
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 48,118 ............... 32,700 -15,418 +32,700
Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -11,310 -11,310 -11,310 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................ 742,838 754,030 876,730 +133,892 +122,700
====================================================================================
NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES............................. 20,272 19,099 19,099 -1,173 ...............
STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE........................................ 186,757 346,923 205,000 +18,243 -141,923
Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -2,923 ............... ............... +2,923
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE........................... 186,757 344,000 205,000 +18,243 -139,000
NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE................................. 12,335 9,800 9,800 -2,535 ...............
ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION.................................. 95,460 110,595 110,595 +15,135 ...............
NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
West Valley Demonstration Project.................................. 53,900 57,600 72,900 +19,000 +15,300
Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (WA)............................... 10,248 10,755 10,755 +507 ...............
Gaseous Diffusion Plants........................................... 37,773 81,296 92,696 +54,923 +11,400
Small Sites........................................................ ............... 64,413 90,060 +90,060 +25,647
Use of Prior year balances......................................... ............... -653 ............... ............... +653
Congressionally directed projects.................................. ............... ............... 3,000 +3,000 +3,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP..................... 101,921 213,411 269,411 +167,490 +56,000
====================================================================================
URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND
Decontamination and decommissioning................................ 602,344 480,333 515,333 -87,011 +35,000
Uranium/thorium reimbursement...................................... 19,818 ............... ............... -19,818 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, UED&D FUND/URANIUM INVENTORY CLEANUP.................. 622,162 480,333 515,333 -106,829 +35,000
====================================================================================
SCIENCE
High energy physics:
Proton accelerator-based physics............................... 373,274 419,577 419,577 +46,303 ...............
Electron accelerator-based physics............................. 78,046 48,772 48,772 -29,274 ...............
Non-accelerator physics........................................ 61,238 86,482 86,482 +25,244 ...............
Theoretical physics............................................ 56,391 63,036 63,036 +6,645 ...............
Advanced technology R&D........................................ 119,368 187,093 187,093 +67,725 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, High energy physics................................... 688,317 804,960 804,960 +116,643 ...............
Nuclear physics.................................................... 415,187 479,019 479,019 +63,832 ...............
Construction:
07-SC-02 Electron beam ion source Brookhaven National 4,162 2,438 2,438 -1,724 ...............
Laboratory, NY............................................
06-SC-01 Project engineering and design [PED] 12 GeV 13,377 28,623 28,623 +15,246 ...............
continuous electron beam accelerator facility upgrade,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator facility (was
project 07-SC-001), Newport News, VA......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Nuclear physics................................. 432,726 510,080 510,080 +77,354 ...............
Biological and environmental research:
Biological research............................................ 407,530 413,613 423,613 +16,083 +10,000
Climate change research........................................ 136,867 154,927 174,927 +38,060 +20,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Biological and environmental research................. 544,397 568,540 598,540 +54,143 +30,000
Basic energy sciences:
Research:
Materials sciences and engineering research................ 946,403 1,125,579 1,038,839 +92,436 -86,740
Chemical sciences, geosciences, and energy biosciences..... 230,234 297,113 231,071 +837 -66,042
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Research....................................... 1,176,637 1,422,692 1,269,910 +93,273 -152,782
Construction:
08-SC-01 Advanced light source [ALS] user support building, 4,954 11,500 11,500 +6,546 ...............
LBNL, CA..................................................
08-SC-10 Project engineering and design [PED] Photon 941 ............... ............... -941 ...............
ultrafast laser science and engineering [PULSE] building
renovation, SLAC, CA......................................
08-SC-11 Photon ultrafast laser science and engineering 6,391 3,728 3,728 -2,663 ...............
[PULSE] building renovation, SLAC, CA.....................
07-SC-06 Project engineering and design [PED] National 29,727 93,273 93,273 +63,546 ...............
Synchrotron light source II [NSLS-II].....................
05-R-320 LINAC coherent light source [LCLS]................ 50,889 36,967 36,967 -13,922 ...............
705-R-321 Center for functional nanomaterials [BNL]........ 363 ............... ............... -363 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction................................... 93,265 145,468 145,468 +52,203 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Basic energy sciences............................. 1,269,902 1,568,160 1,415,378 +145,476 -152,782
Advanced scientific computing research............................. 351,173 368,820 368,820 +17,647 ...............
Fusion energy sciences program..................................... 286,548 493,050 493,050 +206,502 ...............
Science laboratories infrastructure:
Laboratories facilities support:
Infrastructure support:
Payment in lieu of taxes............................... 1,506 1,385 1,385 -121 ...............
Excess facilities disposal............................. 8,748 14,844 14,844 +6,096 ...............
Oak Ridge landlord..................................... 5,033 5,079 5,079 +46 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Infrastructure support..................... 15,287 21,308 21,308 +6,021 ...............
Construction:
09-SC-72 Seismic life-safety, modernization and ............... 12,495 12,495 +12,495 ...............
replacement of general purpose buildings Phase 2, PED/
Construction, LBNL....................................
09-SC-73, Interdisciplinary science building Phase 1, ............... 8,240 8,240 +8,240 ...............
PED, BNL..............................................
09-SC-74, Technology and engineering development ............... 3,700 3,700 +3,700 ...............
facilities PED, TJNAF.................................
08-SC-71 Modernization of laboratory facilities PED, ............... 14,103 14,103 +14,103 ...............
ORNL..................................................
07-SC-05 Physical science facilities, PNNL............. ............... 41,155 41,155 +41,155 ...............
03-SC-001 Science laboratories infrastructure MEL-001 49,574 9,259 9,259 -40,315 ...............
Multiprogram energy laboratory infrastructure
projects, various locations...........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................. 49,574 88,952 88,952 +39,378 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Science laboratories infrastructure......... 64,861 110,260 110,260 +45,399 ...............
Safeguards and security............................................ 75,946 80,603 80,603 +4,657 ...............
Science program direction:
Headquarters................................................... 75,525 82,846 75,525 ............... -7,321
Office of Science and Technical Information.................... ............... 8,916 8,916 +8,916 ...............
Field offices.................................................. 102,254 112,151 102,254 ............... -9,897
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Science program direction............................. 177,779 203,913 186,695 +8,916 -17,218
Workforce development for teachers and scientists.................. 8,044 13,583 13,583 +5,539 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 123,623 ............... 58,500 -65,123 +58,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, SCIENCE............................................ 4,023,316 4,721,969 4,640,469 +617,153 -81,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Less security charge for reimbursable work......................... -5,605 ............... ............... +5,605 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, SCIENCE............................................... 4,017,711 4,721,969 4,640,469 +622,758 -81,500
====================================================================================
NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL
Repository program................................................. 117,906 172,388 118,457 +551 -53,931
Program direction.................................................. 69,363 74,983 74,983 +5,620 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. ............... ............... 1,950 +1,950 +1,950
====================================================================================
TOTAL, NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL................................ 187,269 247,371 195,390 +8,121 -51,981
====================================================================================
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM
Administrative operations.......................................... 5,459 19,880 19,880 +14,421 ...............
Offsetting collection.............................................. -1,000 -19,880 -19,880 -18,880 ...............
Advance appropriation (Public Law 110-161)......................... 42,000 25,000 25,000 -17,000 ...............
Proposed change in subsidy cost.................................... ............... 355,000 355,000 +355,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM............... 46,459 380,000 380,000 +333,541 ...............
====================================================================================
DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION
Administrative operations:
Salaries and expenses:
Office of the Secretary.................................... 5,751 5,700 5,700 -51 ...............
Chief Financial Officer.................................... 41,998 45,048 45,048 +3,050 ...............
Management................................................. 65,033 67,000 67,000 +1,967 ...............
Human capital management................................... 27,986 31,436 31,436 +3,450 ...............
Chief Information Officer.................................. 47,106 53,738 53,738 +6,632 ...............
Congressional and intergovernmental affairs................ 4,733 4,700 4,700 -33 ...............
Economic impact and diversity.............................. 5,614 3,545 3,545 -2,069 ...............
General Counsel............................................ 29,889 31,233 31,233 +1,344 ...............
Policy and international affairs........................... 18,831 19,469 19,469 +638 ...............
Public affairs............................................. 3,339 3,780 3,780 +441 ...............
Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs................ ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Salaries and expenses.......................... 250,280 265,649 265,649 +15,369 ...............
Program support:
Minority economic impact................................... 829 855 855 +26 ...............
Policy analysis and system studies......................... 621 1,000 1,000 +379 ...............
Environmental policy studies............................... 528 531 531 +3 ...............
Climate change technology program (prog. supp)............. 1,059 2,000 2,000 +941 ...............
Cybersecurity and secure communications.................... 34,865 34,512 34,512 -353 ...............
Corporate management information program................... 28,164 27,250 27,250 -914 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Program support................................ 66,066 66,148 66,148 +82 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Administrative operations......................... 316,346 331,797 331,797 +15,451 ...............
Cost of work for others........................................ 91,420 48,537 48,537 -42,883 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION........................ 407,766 380,334 380,334 -27,432 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funding from other defense activities.............................. -98,104 -108,190 -108,190 -10,086 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Departmental administration (gross)................... 309,662 272,144 272,144 -37,518 ...............
====================================================================================
Miscellaneous revenues............................................. -161,247 -117,317 -117,317 +43,930 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (net)..................... 148,415 154,827 154,827 +6,412 ...............
====================================================================================
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL........................................ 46,057 51,927 51,927 +5,870 ...............
ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
WEAPONS ACTIVITIES:
Life extension program:
B61 Life extension program................................. 61,908 2,189 2,189 -59,719 ...............
W76 Life extension program................................. 172,213 209,196 209,196 +36,983 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Life extension program............................ 234,121 211,385 211,385 -22,736 ...............
Stockpile systems:
B61 Stockpile systems...................................... 73,655 80,434 80,434 +6,779 ...............
W62 Stockpile systems...................................... 2,112 1,645 1,645 -467 ...............
W76 Stockpile systems...................................... 67,914 68,418 68,418 +504 ...............
W78 Stockpile systems...................................... 38,245 43,349 43,349 +5,104 ...............
W80 Stockpile systems...................................... 31,753 32,034 32,034 +281 ...............
B83 Stockpile systems...................................... 24,534 25,759 25,759 +1,225 ...............
W87 Stockpile systems...................................... 56,054 37,189 37,189 -18,865 ...............
W88 Stockpile systems...................................... 45,820 49,854 49,854 +4,034 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Stockpile systems................................. 340,087 338,682 338,682 -1,405 ...............
Reliable replacement warhead................................... ............... 10,000 ............... ............... -10,000
Weapons dismantlement and disposition:
Operations and maintenance................................. 134,675 116,822 138,822 +4,147 +22,000
Construction: 99-D-141 Pit disassembly and conversion ............... 66,890 66,890 +66,890 ...............
facility, SRS.............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Weapons dismantlement and disposition............. 134,675 183,712 205,712 +71,037 +22,000
Stockpile services:
Production support......................................... 279,529 302,126 302,126 +22,597 ...............
Research and development support........................... 32,691 36,231 36,231 +3,540 ...............
Research and development certification and safety.......... 178,504 193,375 193,375 +14,871 ...............
Management, technology, and production..................... 201,645 201,375 201,375 -270 ...............
Pit manufacturing.......................................... ............... 145,269 145,269 +145,269 ...............
Pit manufacturing capability............................... ............... 53,560 10,000 +10,000 -43,560
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Stockpile services................................ 692,369 931,936 888,376 +196,007 -43,560
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Directed stockpile work........................... 1,401,252 1,675,715 1,644,155 +242,903 -31,560
Campaigns:
Science campaign:
Advanced certification, non-RRW........................ 14,866 20,000 20,000 +5,134 ...............
Primary assessment technologies........................ 62,312 74,413 82,413 +20,101 +8,000
Dynamic plutonium experiments.......................... ............... 23,734 28,734 +28,734 +5,000
Dynamic materials properties........................... 96,140 85,805 85,805 -10,335 ...............
Advanced radiography................................... 30,402 29,418 29,418 -984 ...............
Secondary assessment technologies...................... 78,999 79,292 79,292 +293 ...............
Test readiness......................................... 4,905 10,408 5,408 +503 -5,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Science campaigns.......................... 287,624 323,070 331,070 +43,446 +8,000
Engineering campaign:
Enhanced surety, non-RRW............................... 34,137 35,641 45,641 +11,504 +10,000
Weapons system engineering assessment technology....... 19,314 17,105 17,105 -2,209 ...............
Nuclear survivability.................................. 8,644 21,753 21,753 +13,109 ...............
Enhanced surveillance.................................. 79,073 68,243 78,243 -830 +10,000
Microsystem and engineering science applications 7,485 ............... ............... -7,485 ...............
[MESA], other project costs...........................
Construction:
08-D-806 Ion beam laboratory refurbishment, SNL, 9,911 ............... ............... -9,911 ...............
Albuquerque, NM...................................
01-D-108 Microsystem and engineering science 10,984 ............... ............... -10,984 ...............
applications [MESA], SNL, Albuquerque, NM.........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, MESA................................... 28,380 ............... ............... -28,380 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Engineering campaign................... 169,548 142,742 162,742 -6,806 +20,000
Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield
campaign:
Ignition............................................... 103,029 103,644 103,644 +615 ...............
NIF diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support... 68,107 68,248 68,248 +141 ...............
Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion............... 10,241 8,920 10,920 +679 +2,000
Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas 3,152 3,147 3,147 -5 ...............
Facility operations and target production.............. 112,012 180,384 210,384 +98,372 +30,000
Inertial fusion technology............................. 29,426 ............... ............... -29,426 ...............
Naval Research Laboratory.............................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
NIF assembly and installation.......................... 134,294 56,899 56,899 -77,395 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal............................................. 460,261 421,242 453,242 -7,019 +32,000
Construction: 96-D-111 National ignition facility, LLNL 9,945 ............... ............... -9,945 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Inertial confinement fusion................ 470,206 421,242 453,242 -16,964 +32,000
Advanced simulation and computing.......................... 574,537 561,742 573,742 -795 +12,000
Pit manufacturing and certification:
Pit manufacturing...................................... 137,323 ............... ............... -137,323 ...............
Pit certification...................................... 37,273 ............... ............... -37,273 ...............
Pit manufacturing capability........................... 39,235 ............... ............... -39,235 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Pit manufacturing and certification........ 213,831 ............... ............... -213,831 ...............
Readiness campaign:
Stockpile readiness.................................... 18,562 28,731 21,731 +3,169 -7,000
High explosives and weapon operations.................. 9,647 8,927 8,927 -720 ...............
Nonnuclear readiness................................... 25,103 40,165 33,165 +8,062 -7,000
Tritium readiness...................................... 71,831 82,265 71,265 -566 -11,000
Advanced design and production technologies............ 32,945 22,949 22,949 -9,996 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Readiness campaign......................... 158,088 183,037 158,037 -51 -25,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Campaigns..................................... 1,873,834 1,631,833 1,678,833 -195,001 +47,000
Readiness in technical base and facilities [RTBF]:
Operations of facilities:
Kansas City Plant...................................... 84,702 122,389 103,389 +18,687 -19,000
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory................. 89,303 85,160 85,160 -4,143 ...............
Los Alamos National Laboratory......................... 285,025 298,112 298,112 +13,087 ...............
Nevada Test Site....................................... 64,863 92,203 92,203 +27,340 ...............
Pantex................................................. 112,813 104,361 104,361 -8,452 ...............
Sandia National Laboratory............................. 153,873 127,827 127,827 -26,046 ...............
Savannah River Site.................................... 85,738 108,114 108,114 +22,376 ...............
Y-12 Productions Plant................................. 224,190 216,904 216,904 -7,286 ...............
Institutional Site Support............................. 53,948 57,837 57,837 +3,889 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, operations of facilities................... 1,154,455 1,212,907 1,193,907 +39,452 -19,000
Program readiness.......................................... 70,099 73,841 73,841 +3,742 ...............
Material recycle and recovery.............................. 71,567 72,509 72,509 +942 ...............
Containers................................................. 21,760 23,398 23,398 +1,638 ...............
Storage.................................................... 34,462 29,846 29,846 -4,616 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, RTBF........................................... 1,352,343 1,412,501 1,393,501 +41,158 -19,000
Construction:
09-D-007, LANSCE Refurbishment PED Los Alamos National ............... ............... 35,000 +35,000 +35,000
La, Los Alamos, NM....................................
09-D-404, Test capabilities revitalization II, Sandia ............... 3,200 3,200 +3,200 ...............
National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM................
08-D-801 High pressure fire loop [HPFL] Pantex Plant, 6,866 2,000 2,000 -4,866 ...............
Amerillo, TX..........................................
08-D-802 High explosive pressing facility Pantex Plant, 15,008 28,233 28,233 +13,225 ...............
Amerillo, TX..........................................
08-D-804 TA-55 Reinvestment project, Los Alamos 5,885 7,900 7,900 +2,015 ...............
National Laboratory [LANL]............................
08-D-806 Ion beam laboratory refurbishment, SNL ............... 10,014 10,014 +10,014 ...............
Albuquerque, NM.......................................
07-D-140 Project engineering and design [PED], various 2,452 7,446 7,446 +4,994 ...............
locations.............................................
07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility 26,162 19,660 19,660 -6,502 ...............
upgrade project, LANL.................................
06-D-140 Project engineering and design [PED], various 41,552 104,661 47,083 +5,531 -57,578
locations.............................................
06-D-402 NTS replace fire stations 1 & 2 Nevada Test 6,591 9,340 9,340 +2,749 ...............
Site, NV..............................................
05-D-140 Project engineering and design [PED], various 1,961 ............... ............... -1,961 ...............
locations.............................................
05-D-402 Beryllium capability [BEC] project, Y-12 ............... 5,015 5,015 +5,015 ...............
National security complex, Oak Ridge, TN..............
04-D-125 Chemistry and metallurgy facility replacement 74,141 100,200 125,000 +50,859 +24,800
project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,
NM....................................................
04-D-128 TA-18 mission relocation project, Los Alamos 28,892 10,353 10,353 -18,539 ...............
Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM............................
01-D-124 HEU materials facility, Y-12 plant, Oak Ridge, 75,528 ............... ............... -75,528 ...............
TN....................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................... 285,038 308,022 310,244 +25,206 +2,222
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities.... 1,637,381 1,720,523 1,703,745 +66,364 -16,778
Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization pgm............. 118,471 99,550 93,550 -24,921 -6,000
Construction:
08-D-601 Mercury highway, Nevada Test Site, NV......... 7,651 11,700 11,700 +4,049 ...............
08-D-602 Portable water system upgrades Y-12 Plant, Oak 22,070 27,666 27,666 +5,596 ...............
Ridge, TN.............................................
07-D-253 TA 1 heating systems modernization [HSM] 12,751 15,755 15,755 +3,004 ...............
Sandia National Laboratory............................
06-D-601 Electrical distribution system upgrade, Pantex 2,452 4,000 4,000 +1,548 ...............
Plant, Amarillo, TX...................................
06-D-602 Gas main and distribution system upgrade, 1,863 ............... ............... -1,863 ...............
Pantex Plant, Amarillo, TX............................
06-D-603 Steam plant life extension project [SLEP], Y- 14,733 10,878 10,878 -3,855 ...............
12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN..........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction............................. 61,520 69,999 69,999 +8,479 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Facilities and infrastructure 179,991 169,549 163,549 -16,442 -6,000
recapitalization program..........................
Transformation disposition..................................... ............... 77,391 ............... ............... -77,391
Safeguards and security:
Secure transportation asset:
Operations and equipment............................... 128,343 131,651 131,651 +3,308 ...............
Program direction...................................... 83,180 89,421 89,421 +6,241 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Secure transportation asset................ 211,523 221,072 221,072 +9,549 ...............
Defense nuclear security................................... 728,123 690,217 690,217 -37,906 ...............
Construction:
08-D-701 Nuclear materials S&S upgrade project Los 48,550 46,000 46,000 -2,550 ...............
Alamos National Laboratory........................
05-D-170 Project engineering and design [PED], 7,847 1,111 1,111 -6,736 ...............
various locations.................................
08-D-702 Material security consolidation project, 14,713 ............... ............... -14,713 ...............
Idaho National Lab, ID............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction........................... 71,110 47,111 47,111 -23,999 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense nuclear security............... 799,233 737,328 737,328 -61,905 ...............
Cybersecurity.............................................. 100,287 122,511 122,511 +22,224 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Safeguards and security........................... 899,520 859,839 859,839 -39,681 ...............
Environmental projects and operations: Long term stewardship... 8,592 40,587 28,316 +19,724 -12,271
Nuclear weapons incident response.............................. 158,655 221,936 221,936 +63,281 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.............................. 47,232 ............... 3,500 -43,732 +3,500
Less security charge for reimbursable work..................... -34,000 ............... ............... +34,000 ...............
Use of prior year balances..................................... -86,514 -366 -366 +86,148 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES................................. 6,297,466 6,618,079 6,524,579 +227,113 -93,500
Rescission of prior year balances.............................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.................................... 6,297,466 6,618,079 6,524,579 +227,113 -93,500
====================================================================================
DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION
Nonproliferation and verification, R&D............................. 362,424 261,944 336,944 -25,480 +75,000
Construction:
07-SC-05 Physical Science Facility, Pacific Northwest ............... 13,147 13,147 +13,147 ...............
National Laboratory, Richland, WA.........................
06-D-180 06-01 Project engineering and design [PED] 24,772 ............... ............... -24,772 ...............
National Security Laboratory, PNNL........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Nonproliferation & verification R&D............ 387,196 275,091 350,091 -37,105 +75,000
Nonproliferation and international security........................ 149,993 140,467 175,467 +25,474 +35,000
International nuclear materials protection and cooperation......... 624,482 429,694 429,694 -194,788 ...............
Elimination of weapons-grade plutonium production program.......... 179,940 141,299 141,299 -38,641 ...............
Fissile materials disposition:
U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition..................... ............... 40,774 40,774 +40,774 ...............
U.S. uranium disposition....................................... 66,235 ............... ............... -66,235 ...............
Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility:
Operations and maintenance................................. ............... 19,200 19,200 +19,200 ...............
Construction and other project costs: 99-D-143 MOX fuel ............... 467,808 467,808 +467,808 ...............
fabrication facility......................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility.......... ............... 487,008 487,008 +487,008 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, U.S. surplus fissile materials disp............ 66,235 527,782 527,782 +461,547 ...............
Russian surplus materials disposition.......................... ............... 1,000 1,000 +1,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Fissile materials disposition......................... 66,235 528,782 528,782 +462,547 ...............
Global threat reduction initiative................................. 193,225 219,641 284,641 +91,416 +65,000
International nuclear fuel bank.................................... 49,545 ............... ............... -49,545 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 7,380 ............... ............... -7,380 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................... 1,657,996 1,734,974 1,909,974 +251,978 +175,000
Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -918 -918 -918 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation................... 1,657,996 1,734,056 1,909,056 +251,060 +175,000
Rescissions:
Rescission of prior year balances--Russian Surplus Materials -57,000 ............... ............... +57,000 ...............
Disposition program...........................................
Rescission of prior year balances--Fissile materials -115,000 ............... ............... +115,000 ...............
disposition MOX construction line.............................
Rescission of prior year balances for Emergency Supplemental -150,000 ............... ............... +150,000 ...............
for fiscal year 1999 (H.R. 4328, Public Law 102-277)..........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Rescissions......................................... -322,000 ............... ............... +322,000 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION.................... 1,335,996 1,734,056 1,909,056 +573,060 +175,000
====================================================================================
NAVAL REACTORS
Naval reactors development......................................... 732,374 771,600 771,600 +39,226 ...............
Construction:
09-D-190, PED, Infrastructure upgrades, KAPL................... ............... 1,000 1,000 +1,000 ...............
09-D-902, NRF Office Building #2, ECC upgrade, Idaho........... ............... 8,300 8,300 +8,300 ...............
08-D-901 Shipping and receiving and warehouse complex [SRWC], 8,918 ............... ............... -8,918 ...............
BAPL..........................................................
08-D-190 Project engineering and design, Expended Core Facility 545 300 300 -245 ...............
M-290 recovering discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID
07-D-190 Materials research technology complex [MRTC].......... 446 12,400 12,400 +11,954 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Construction....................................... 9,909 22,000 22,000 +12,091 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Naval reactors development............................ 742,283 793,600 793,600 +51,317 ...............
Program direction.................................................. 32,403 34,454 34,454 +2,051 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS........................................ 774,686 828,054 828,054 +53,368 ...............
====================================================================================
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
Office of the Administrator........................................ 379,997 404,081 404,081 +24,084 ...............
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 22,140 ............... ............... -22,140 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR........................... 402,137 404,081 404,081 +1,944 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.............. 8,810,285 9,584,270 9,665,770 +855,485 +81,500
====================================================================================
DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Closure Sites...................................................... 42,050 45,883 59,383 +17,333 +13,500
Hanford Site:
Operating projects 2012 accelerated completions................ 419,189 400,902 490,479 +71,290 +89,577
Operating projects 2035 accelerated completions................ 467,309 450,885 530,085 +62,776 +79,200
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Hanford Site.......................................... 886,498 851,787 1,020,564 +134,066 +168,777
Idaho National Laboratory.......................................... 508,358 432,124 465,124 -43,234 +33,000
NNSA:
NNSA Service Center/SPRU....................................... 28,831 16,943 21,943 -6,888 +5,000
Nevada......................................................... 80,368 65,674 75,674 -4,694 +10,000
California site support........................................ 367 ............... ............... -367 ...............
Pantex......................................................... 20,027 ............... ............... -20,027 ...............
Sandia National Laboratories................................... ............... ............... 3,000 +3,000 +3,000
Los Alamos National Laboratory................................. 152,070 162,467 245,467 +93,397 +83,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites....................... 281,663 245,084 346,084 +64,421 +101,000
Oak Ridge Reservation.............................................. 190,535 237,670 255,000 +64,465 +17,330
Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment & immobilization plant......................... 683,722 690,000 690,000 +6,278 ...............
Tank Farm activities:
Rad liquid tank waste stabil. and disposition.............. 285,351 288,443 341,443 +56,092 +53,000
River protection community and regulatory support.......... 467 ............... ............... -467 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Tank Farm activities........................... 285,818 288,443 341,443 +55,625 +53,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Office of River Protection........................ 969,540 978,443 1,031,443 +61,903 +53,000
Savannah River site:
04-D-423 Container surveillance capability in 235F............. 10,900 ............... ............... -10,900 ...............
04-D-414 Project Engineering and Design, 105-K................. ............... 2,032 2,032 +2,032 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions....................... 10,900 2,032 2,032 -8,868 ...............
Operating projects 2035 accelerated completions.................... 509,394 498,651 557,187 +47,793 +58,536
Construction: 08-D-414 Project engineering and design Plutonium 991 ............... ............... -991 ...............
Vitrification Facility, VL....................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions....................... 510,385 498,651 557,187 +46,802 +58,536
Tank Farm activities:
Rad liquid tank waste stabil. and disposition.............. 513,799 578,218 578,218 +64,419 ...............
05-D-405, Salt waste processing facility................... 87,199 127,524 127,524 +40,325 ...............
03-D-414, Salt waste processing facility PED SR............ 9,910 ............... ............... -9,910 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Tank farm activities........................... 610,908 705,742 705,742 +94,834 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Savannah River site............................... 1,132,193 1,206,425 1,264,961 +132,768 +58,536
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant........................................ 234,585 211,524 231,661 -2,924 +20,137
Program direction.................................................. 306,941 308,765 308,765 +1,824 ...............
Program support.................................................... 32,844 33,930 33,930 +1,086 ...............
Safeguards and Security............................................ 259,332 251,341 260,341 +1,009 +9,000
Technology development............................................. 21,194 32,389 22,250 +1,056 -10,139
Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution........................... 458,787 463,000 463,000 +4,213 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP..................... 5,324,520 5,298,365 5,762,506 +437,986 +464,141
====================================================================================
Congressionally directed projects.................................. 17,195 ............... 9,000 -8,195 +9,000
Use of prior year balances......................................... ............... -1,109 ............... ............... +1,109
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP........................ 5,341,715 5,297,256 5,771,506 +429,791 +474,250
====================================================================================
OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
Health, safety and security:
Health, safety and security.................................... 326,324 347,271 347,271 +20,947 ...............
Program direction.............................................. 99,137 99,597 99,597 +460 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Health, safety and security........................... 425,461 446,868 446,868 +21,407 ...............
Office of Legacy Management:
Legacy management.............................................. 144,060 174,397 174,397 +30,337 ...............
Program direction.............................................. 10,901 11,584 11,584 +683 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Office of Legacy Management........................... 154,961 185,981 185,981 +31,020 ...............
Nuclear energy: Infrastructure: Idaho sitewide safeguards and 75,261 78,811 78,811 +3,550 ...............
security..........................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Nuclear energy........................................ 75,261 78,811 78,811 +3,550 ...............
Defense related administrative support............................. 98,104 108,190 108,190 +10,086 ...............
Office of Hearings and Appeals..................................... 4,565 6,603 6,603 +2,038 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Other Defense Activities........................... 758,352 826,453 826,453 +68,101 ...............
====================================================================================
Congressionally directed projects.................................. ............... ............... 1,050 +1,050 +1,050
Less security charge for reimbursable work......................... -3,003 ............... ............... +3,003 ...............
Use of prior year balances......................................... -990 ............... ............... +990 ...............
====================================================================================
TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.............................. 754,359 826,453 827,503 +73,144 +1,050
====================================================================================
DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL..................................... 199,171 247,371 193,000 -6,171 -54,371
====================================================================================
TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES...................... 15,105,530 15,955,350 16,457,779 +1,352,249 +502,429
====================================================================================
POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS
SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION:
Operation and maintenance:
Purchase power and wheeling................................ 62,215 63,522 63,522 +1,307 ...............
Program direction.......................................... 6,404 7,420 7,420 +1,016 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 68,619 70,942 70,942 +2,323 ...............
Less alternative financing (PPW)............................... -13,802 -14,002 -14,002 -200 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -48,413 -49,520 -49,520 -1,107 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 6,404 7,420 7,420 +1,016 ...............
====================================================================================
SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION:
Operation and maintenance:
Operating expenses......................................... 11,892 12,865 12,865 +973 ...............
Purchase power and wheeling................................ 45,000 46,000 46,000 +1,000 ...............
Program direction.......................................... 22,054 24,330 24,330 +2,276 ...............
Construction............................................... 4,269 5,991 5,991 +1,722 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 83,215 89,186 89,186 +5,971 ...............
Less alternative financing (for program direction)............. -877 -2,200 -2,200 -1,323 ...............
Less alternative financing (for O&M)........................... -6,304 -9,381 -9,381 -3,077 ...............
Less alternative financing (PPW)............................... -10,000 -11,000 -11,000 -1,000 ...............
Less alternative financing (Const.)............................ -869 -3,191 -3,191 -2,322 ...............
Offsetting collections......................................... -35,000 -35,000 -35,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 30,165 28,414 28,414 -1,751 ...............
====================================================================================
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION:
Operation and maintenance:
Construction and rehabilitation............................ 62,419 74,544 74,544 +12,125 ...............
Operation and maintenance.................................. 52,873 52,365 52,365 -508 ...............
Purchase power and wheeling................................ 475,254 525,960 600,960 +125,706 +75,000
Program direction.......................................... 156,128 166,423 166,423 +10,295 ...............
Utah mitigation and conservation........................... 7,114 7,342 7,342 +228 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance...................... 753,788 826,634 901,634 +147,846 +75,000
Less alternative financing (for O&M)........................... -5,000 -15,499 -15,499 -10,499 ...............
Less alternative financing (for Const.)........................ -30,690 -72,663 -47,663 -16,973 +25,000
Less alternative financing (for Program direction)............. -10,000 -15,800 -15,800 -5,800 ...............
Less alternative financing (for PPW)........................... -166,552 -197,842 -197,842 -31,290 ...............
Offsetting collections (Public Law 108-477, Public Law 109-103) -308,702 -328,118 -403,118 -94,416 -75,000
Offsetting collections (Public Law 98-381)..................... -3,937 -3,366 -3,366 +571 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION..................... 228,907 193,346 218,346 -10,561 +25,000
====================================================================================
FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND: Operation and 2,477 2,959 2,959 +482 ...............
maintenance.......................................................
====================================================================================
TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS....................... 267,953 232,139 257,139 -10,814 +25,000
====================================================================================
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION:
Federal energy regulatory commission........................... 260,425 273,400 273,400 +12,975 ...............
FERC revenues.................................................. -260,425 -273,400 -273,400 -12,975 ...............
====================================================================================
GRAND TOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY............................ 24,122,361 25,917,888 27,041,658 +2,919,297 +1,123,770
(Total amount appropriated).............................. (24,294,361) (25,743,888) (26,867,658) (+2,573,297) (+1,123,770)
(Rescissions, including emergency funding)............... (-322,000) ............... ............... (+322,000) ...............
(Deferrals).............................................. (108,000) (149,000) (149,000) (+41,000) ...............
(Advance appropriation).................................. (42,000) (25,000) (25,000) (-17,000) ...............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL PROVISIONS--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
The following list of general provisions is recommended by
the Committee. The recommendation includes several provisions
which have been included in previous Energy and Water
Appropriations Acts and new provisions as follows:
Section 301. Language is included under section 301 to
provide incentives for downblending of highly enriched uranium.
Section 302. Language is included under section 302, which
prohibits the use of funds in this act to initiate a request
for proposal of expression of interest for new programs which
have not yet been presented to Congress in the annual budget
submission and which have not yet been approved and funded by
Congress.
Section 303. Language is included under section 303 which
prohibits the use of funds for severance payments under the
worker and community transition program under section 3161 of
Public Law 102-484.
Section 304. Language is included under section 304 to
prohibit the augmentation of several payments under section
3161 of Public Law 102-484 unless a reprogramming request is
submitted to Congress.
Section 305. Language is included in section 305, which
permits the transfer and merger of unexpended balances of prior
appropriations with appropriation accounts established in this
bill.
Section 306. Language is included that prohibits the use of
funds by the Bonneville Power Administration to enter into
energy efficiency contracts outside its service area.
Section 307. This section establishes certain notice and
competition requirements for Department of Energy user
facilities.
Section 308. Language is included specifically authorizing
intelligence activities pending enactment of the fiscal year
2008 Intelligence Authorization Act.
Section 309. Language included in section 309 related to
laboratory directed research and development authorizes an
increase of 2 percent in laboratory directed research and
development funds for the purpose of diversifying the
laboratories' activities in the areas of energy security and
global climate science and modeling.
Section 310. Language is included regarding transfer
authority.
Section 311. The Committee has included a provision related
to general plant projects.
Section 312. The Committee has included a provision related
to the Reno Hydrogen Fuel Project.
Section 313. The Committee has included a provision related
to the integrated university program.
Section 314. The Committee has included a provision related
to naming laboratory facilities.
TITLE IV
INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appalachian Regional Commission
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $73,032,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 65,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 85,000,000
Established in 1965, the Appalachian Regional Commission is
an economic development agency composed of 13 Appalachian
States and a Federal co-chair appointed by the President. For
fiscal year 2009, the Committee recommends $85,000,000 for the
ARC, of which $6,325,000 is for salaries and expenses and
$71,675,000 is for area development and $7,000,000 is for local
development districts.
Area Development and Technical Assistant Program funds are
used to increase job opportunities and income, improve
education and health, strengthen infrastructure, and for the
Appalachian Highway System. Such funds are allocated by
formula, with assistance targeted to the most distressed and
underdeveloped areas.
Local Development Districts Program funds assist local
governments in promoting sustainable community and economic
development in the Appalachian region.
The Committee recognizes the importance of trade and
investment opportunities to the Appalachian Region and is
encouraged by the findings in a report that Appalachian firms
could find significant trade and investment opportunities,
particularly in the energy, high technology, and transportation
sectors in the Republic of Turkey and the surrounding region.
In this regard, the Committee supports the Appalachian-Turkish
Trade Project [ATTP], a project to promote opportunities to
expand trade, encourage business interests, stimulate foreign
studies, and to build a lasting and mutually meaningful
relationship between Appalachian States and the Republic of
Turkey, as well as the neighboring regions, such as Greece. The
Committee commends the ARC for its leadership role in helping
to implement the mission of the ATTP. The Committee expects the
ARC to continue to be a prominent ATTP sponsor.
The Committee has included no earmarks in the ARC funds.
The Commission allocates its funds by formula to its member
States, based primarily on need. Under the Commission's formula
system, earmarks out of ARC's base funding could come at the
expense of those States that have no earmarks. Accordingly, the
Committee directs that any earmarks in any State be taken from
within that State's regular ARC allocation.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $21,909,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 25,499,000
Committee recommendation................................ 25,499,000
For fiscal year 2009, the Committee recommends $25,499,000,
the same as the President's request, for the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board [DNFSB]. This Board is responsible for
evaluating the implementation of standards for design,
construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Department
of Energy's defense nuclear facilities. Based on these
evaluations, the Board makes specific recommendations to the
Secretary of Energy to ensure that both public and employee
heath and safety are protected. The Committee encourages the
DNFSB to undertake the responsibility to provide cost estimates
to accompany their recommendations.
Delta Regional Authority
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $11,685,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 6,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 20,000,000
For the Delta Regional Authority, the Committee recommends
$20,000,000. The Delta Regional Authority was established to
assist the eight State Mississippi Delta Region in obtaining
basic infrastructure, transportation, skills training, and
opportunities for economic development. The Government
Accountability Office recently reported that the DRA has a
commendable record in the percentage of funds spent in rural
America, and the Committee recognizes the DRA's role in
bettering this underserved area of the Nation.
Denali Commission
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $21,800,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,800,000
Committee recommendation................................ 21,800,000
The Denali Commission is a Federal-State partnership
responsible for promoting infrastructure development, job
training, and other economic development services in rural
areas throughout Alaska. For fiscal year 2009, the Committee
recommends $21,800,000.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $917,334,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 1,007,956,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,022,956,000
REVENUES
Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$771,220,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... -847,357,000
Committee recommendation................................ -860,857,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $146,114,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 160,599,000
Committee recommendation................................ 162,099,000
The Committee recommendation for the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission for fiscal year 2009 is $1,022,956, an increase of
$15,000,000 over the budget request. This amount is offset by
estimated revenues of $860,857,000 resulting in a net
appropriation of $162,099,000. The Committee has provided
$15,000,000 to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to support its
participation in an Integrated University Program. The
Committee recommends $10,000,000 of this amount to be used to
support university programs relevant to the NRC mission. In
addition, not less than $5,000,000 of this amount will be used
for grants to support research projects that do not align with
programmatic missions but are critical to maintaining the
discipline of nuclear science and engineering.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $8,744,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 9,044,000
Committee recommendation................................ 9,344,000
REVENUES
Appropriations, 2008.................................... -$7,870,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... -8,140,600
Committee recommendation................................ -8,410,000
NET APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $874,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 904,000
Committee recommendation................................ 934,000
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $9,344,000, an
increase of $300,000 over the budget request. The additional
funds will provide the Office of Inspector General with the
necessary resources to provide effective oversight of the
agency's IT security controls and information to identify
vulnerabilities and mitigate risks to the agency's operations.
The Committee also recommends that the current no year funding
authority of the Office of Inspector General be retained. The
Office of Inspector General, as an administrative entity, is
fully integrated into the administrative processes at the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission to include its accounting, pay
and travel system, as well as other infrastructure support
systems. In addition, the proposed 2-year funding authority
could limit the continuity of the Inspector General's
oversight.
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board
Appropriations, 2008.................................... $3,621,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 3,811,000
Committee recommendation................................ 3,811,000
The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board was established to
evaluate the scientific and technical validity of the
Department of Energy's nuclear waste disposal program. The
Board reports its findings no fewer than two times a year to
Congress and to the Secretary of Energy. For fiscal year 2009,
the Committee recommends $3,811,000.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation
Projects
Appropriation, 2008..................................... $2,261,000
Budget estimate, 2009................................... 4,400,000
Committee recommendation................................ 4,400,000
The Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural
Gas Transportation Projects was established as an independent
agency in the executive branch on December 13, 2006, pursuant
to the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act of 2004. The Committee
recommends $4,400,000, the same as the budget request.
Tennessee Valley Authority
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
GROSS APPROPRIATION
Appropriations, 2008....................................................
Budget estimate, 2009................................... $17,000,000
Committee recommendation................................................
OFFSET FROM TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY FUND
Appropriations, 2008....................................................
Budget estimate, 2009................................... -$17,000,000
Committee recommendation................................................
The Committee recommendation does not include the
administration's proposal to establish a congressionally funded
Office of the Inspector General to oversee the Tennessee Valley
Authority. In recent years, the TVA has funded the requests of
the TVA-IG office out of power revenues and receipts. This
process has worked well, and the Committee sees no compelling
reason to change that mechanism for funding the TVA-IG.
General Provision, Independent Agencies
The following general provision is recommended by the
Committee.
TITLE V
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following list of general provisions are recommended by
the Committee.
Section 501. The provision prohibits the use of any funds
provided in this bill from being used to influence
congressional action.
Section 502. The provision addresses transfer authority
under this act.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
The Committee recommends funding for the following programs
or activities which currently lack authorization for fiscal
year 2009:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: General Investigations;
Construction, General; Mississippi River and Tributaries;
Operations and Maintenance; Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial
Action Program;
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation;
Water and Related Resources;
Department of Energy: Energy Conservation and Supply
Activities:
Office of Fossil Energy: Fossil Energy R&D, Clean Coal,
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Research;
Health, Safety and Security;
Non-Defense Environmental Management;
Office of Science;
Department of Administration;
National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons
Activities; Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation; Naval Reactors;
Office of the Administrator;
Defense Environmental Management, Defense Site Acceleration
Completion;
Other Defense Activities;
Defense Nuclear Waste Fund;
Office of Security and Performance Assurance;
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
Power Marketing Administrations: Southeastern,
Southwestern, Western Area; and
Energy Information Administration.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 10, 2008,
the Committee ordered reported an original bill (S. 3258)
making appropriations for the energy and water development and
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009,
and authorized the chairman of the Committee or the chairman of
the subcommittee to offer the text of the Senate bill as a
Committee amendment in the nature of a substitute to the House
companion measure, with the bill subject to amendment and
subject to the budget allocations, by a recorded vote of 29-0,
a quorum being present. The vote was as follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairman Byrd
Mr. Inouye
Mr. Leahy
Mr. Harkin
Ms. Mikulski
Mr. Kohl
Mrs. Murray
Mr. Dorgan
Mrs. Feinstein
Mr. Durbin
Mr. Johnson
Ms. Landrieu
Mr. Reed
Mr. Lautenberg
Mr. Nelson
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Stevens
Mr. Specter
Mr. Domenici
Mr. Bond
Mr. McConnell
Mr. Shelby
Mr. Gregg
Mr. Bennett
Mr. Craig
Mrs. Hutchison
Mr. Brownback
Mr. Allard
Mr. Alexander
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the Committee.''
In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law
proposed to be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing
law to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is
printed in italic; and existing law in which no change is
proposed is shown in roman.
OMNIBUS CONSOLIDATED RESCISSIONS AND APPROPRIATIONS ACT OF 1996, PUBLIC
LAW 104-134
SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT OF 1996
TITLE III
RESCISSIONS AND OFFSETS
CHAPTER 1
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT
Subchapter A--United States Enrichment Corporation Privatization
SEC. 3102. DEFINITIONS.
[For purposes] Except as provided in section 3112A, for
purposes of this subchapter:
* * * * * * *
SEC. 3112. URANIUM TRANSFERS AND SALES.
(a) Transfers and Sales by the Secretary.--The Secretary
shall not provide enrichment services or transfer or sell any
uranium (including natural uranium concentrates, natural
uranium hexafluoride, or enriched uranium in any form) to any
person except as consistent with this section.
* * * * * * *
(f) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this subchapter shall be
read to modify the terms of the Russian HEU Agreement.
SEC. 3112A. INCENTIVES FOR ADDITIONAL DOWNBLENDING OF HIGHLY ENRICHED
URANIUM BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Completion of the russian heu agreement.--The
term ``completion of the Russian HEU Agreement'' means
the importation into the United States from the Russian
Federation pursuant to the Russian HEU Agreement of
uranium derived from the downblending of not less than
500 metric tons of highly enriched uranium of weapons
origin.
(2) Downblending.--The term ``downblending'' means
processing highly enriched uranium into a uranium
product in any form in which the uranium contains less
than 20 percent uranium-235.
(3) Highly enriched uranium.--The term ``highly
enriched uranium'' has the meaning given that term in
section 3102(4).
(4) Highly enriched uranium of weapons origin.--The
term ``highly enriched uranium of weapons origin''
means highly enriched uranium that--
(A) contains 90 percent or more uranium-
235; and
(B) is verified by the Secretary of Energy
to be of weapons origin.
(5) Low-enriched uranium.--The term ``low-enriched
uranium'' means a uranium product in any form,
including uranium hexafluoride (UF6) and
uranium oxide (UO2), in which the uranium
contains less than 20 percent uranium-235, including
natural uranium, without regard to whether the uranium
is incorporated into fuel rods or complete fuel
assemblies.
(6) Russian heu agreement.--The term ``Russian HEU
Agreement'' has the meaning given that term in section
3102(11).
(7) Uranium-235.--The term ``uranium-235'' means
the isotope \235\U.
(b) Statement of Policy.--It is the policy of the United
States to support the continued downblending of highly enriched
uranium of weapons origin in the Russian Federation in order to
protect the essential security interests of the United States
with respect to the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons.
(c) Promotion of Downblending of Russian Highly Enriched
Uranium.--
(1) Completion of the russian heu agreement.--Prior
to the completion of the Russian HEU Agreement, the
importation into the United States of low-enriched
uranium, including low-enriched uranium obtained under
contracts for separative work units, that is produced
in the Russian Federation and is not imported pursuant
to the Russian HEU Agreement, may not exceed the
following amounts:
(A) In the 4-year period beginning with
calendar year 2008, 16,559 kilograms.
(B) In calendar year 2012, 24,839
kilograms.
(C) In calendar year 2013 and each calendar
year thereafter through the calendar year of
the completion of the Russian HEU Agreement,
41,398 kilograms.
(2) Incentives to continue downblending russian
highly enriched uranium after the completion of the
russian heu agreement.--
(A) In general.--After the completion of
the Russian HEU Agreement, the importation into
the United States of low-enriched uranium,
including low-enriched uranium obtained under
contracts for separative work units, that is
produced in the Russian Federation, whether or
not such low-enriched uranium is derived from
highly enriched uranium of weapons origin, may
not exceed--
(i) in calendar year 2014, 485,279
kilograms;
(ii) in calendar year 2015, 455,142
kilograms;
(iii) in calendar year 2016,
480,146 kilograms;
(iv) in calendar year 2017, 490,710
kilograms;
(v) in calendar year 2018, 492,731
kilograms;
(vi) in calendar year 2019, 509,058
kilograms; and
(vii) in calendar year 2020,
514,754 kilograms.
(B) Additional imports in exchange for a
commitment to downblend an additional 300
metric tons of highly enriched uranium.--
(i) In general.--In addition to the
amount authorized to be imported under
subparagraph (A) and except as provided
in clause (ii), if the Russian
Federation enters into a bilateral
agreement with the United States under
which the Russian Federation agrees to
downblend an additional 300 metric tons
of highly enriched uranium after the
completion of the Russian HEU
Agreement, 4 kilograms of low-enriched
uranium, whether or not such low-
enriched uranium is derived from highly
enriched uranium of weapons origin and
including low-enriched uranium obtained
under contracts for separative work
units, may be imported in a calendar
year for every 1 kilogram of Russian
highly enriched uranium of weapons
origin that was downblended in the
preceding calendar year, subject to the
verification of the Secretary of Energy
under paragraph (9).
(ii) Maximum annual imports.--Not
more than 120,000 kilograms of low-
enriched uranium may be imported in a
calendar year under clause (i).
(3) Exceptions.--The import limitations described
in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not apply to low-
enriched uranium produced in the Russian Federation
that is imported into the United States--
(A) for use in the initial core of a new
nuclear reactor;
(B) for processing and to be certified for
re-exportation and not for consumption in the
United States; or
(C) to be added to the inventory of the
Department of Energy.
(4) Adjustments to import limitations.--
(A) In general.--The import limitations
described in paragraph (2)(A) are based on the
reference data in the 2005 Market Report on the
Global Nuclear Fuel Market Supply and Demand
2005-2030 of the World Nuclear Association. In
each of calendar years 2016 and 2019, the
Secretary of Commerce shall review the
projected demand for uranium for nuclear
reactors in the United States and adjust the
import limitations described in paragraph
(2)(A) to account for changes in such demand in
years after the year in which that report or a
subsequent report is published.
(B) Incentive adjustment.--Beginning in the
second calendar year after the calendar year of
the completion of the Russian HEU Agreement,
the Secretary of Energy shall increase or
decrease the amount of low-enriched uranium
that may be imported in a calendar year under
paragraph (2)(B) (including the amount of low-
enriched uranium that may be imported for each
kilogram of highly enriched uranium downblended
under paragraph (2)(B)(i)) by a percentage
equal to the percentage increase or decrease,
as the case may be, in the average amount of
uranium loaded into nuclear power reactors in
the United States in the most recent 3-
calendar-year period for which data are
available, as reported by the Energy
Information Administration of the Department of
Energy, compared to the average amount of
uranium loaded into such reactors during the 3-
calendar-year period beginning on January 1,
2011, as reported by the Energy Information
Administration.
(C) Publication of adjustments.--As soon as
practicable, but not later than July 31 of each
calendar year, the Secretary of Energy shall
publish in the Federal Register the amount of
low-enriched uranium that may be imported in
the current calendar year after the adjustments
under subparagraph (B).
(5) Authority for additional adjustment.--In
addition to the adjustment under paragraph (4)(A), the
Secretary of Commerce may adjust the import limitations
under paragraph (2)(A) for a calendar year if the
Secretary--
(A) in consultation with the Secretary of
Energy, determines that the available supply of
low-enriched uranium and the available
stockpiles of uranium of the Department of
Energy are insufficient to meet demand in the
United States in the following calendar year;
and
(B) notifies Congress of the adjustment not
less than 45 days before making the adjustment.
(6) Equivalent quantities of low-enriched uranium
imports.--
(A) In general.--The import limitations
described in paragraphs (1) and (2) are
expressed in terms of uranium containing 4.4
percent uranium-235 and a tails assay of 0.3
percent.
(B) Adjustment for other uranium.--Imports
of low-enriched uranium under paragraphs (1)
and (2), including low-enriched uranium
obtained under contracts for separative work
units, shall count against the import
limitations described in such paragraphs in
amounts calculated as the quantity of low-
enriched uranium containing 4.4 percent
uranium-235 necessary to equal the total amount
of uranium-235 contained in such imports.
(7) Downblending of other highly enriched
uranium.--
(A) In general.--The downblending of highly
enriched uranium not of weapons origin may be
counted for purposes of paragraph (2)(B),
subject to verification under paragraph (9), if
the Secretary of Energy determines that the
highly enriched uranium to be downblended poses
a risk to the national security of the United
States.
(B) Equivalent quantities of highly
enriched uranium.--For purposes of determining
the additional low-enriched uranium imports
allowed under paragraph (2)(B), highly enriched
uranium not of weapons origin downblended
pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall count as
downblended highly enriched uranium of weapons
origin in amounts calculated as the quantity of
highly enriched uranium containing 90 percent
uranium-235 necessary to equal the total amount
of uranium-235 contained in the highly enriched
uranium not of weapons origin downblended
pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(8) Termination of import restrictions.--The
provisions of this subsection shall terminate on
December 31, 2020.
(9) Technical verifications by secretary of
energy.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary of Energy
shall verify the origin, quantity, and uranium-
235 content of the highly enriched uranium
downblended for purposes of paragraphs (2)(B)
and (7).
(B) Methods of verification.--In conducting
the verification required under subparagraph
(A), the Secretary of Energy shall employ the
transparency measures and access provisions
agreed to under the Russian HEU Agreement for
monitoring the downblending of Russian highly
enriched uranium of weapons origin and such
other methods as the Secretary determines
appropriate.
(10) Enforcement of import limitations.--The
Secretary of Commerce shall be responsible for
enforcing the import limitations imposed under this
subsection and shall enforce such import limitations in
a manner that imposes a minimal burden on the
commercial nuclear industry.
(11) Effect on other agreements.--
(A) Russian heu agreement.--Nothing in this
section shall be construed to modify the terms
of the Russian HEU Agreement, including the
provisions of the Agreement relating to the
amount of low-enriched uranium that may be
imported into the United States.
(B) Other agreements.--If a provision of
any agreement between the United States and the
Russian Federation, other than the Russian HEU
Agreement, relating to the importation of low-
enriched uranium, including low-enriched
uranium obtained under contracts for separative
work units, into the United States conflicts
with a provision of this section, the provision
of this section shall supersede the provision
of the agreement to the extent of the conflict.
* * * * * * *
WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1996, PUBLIC LAW 104-303
TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS
SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.
(a) * * *
* * * * * * *
(1) * * *
* * * * * * *
(5) San lorenzo river, california.--
(A) In General._The project for flood
control, San Lorenzo River, California: Report
of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994,
at a total cost of $21,800,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $10,900,000 and an
estimated non-Federal cost of $10,900,000 and
habitat restoration, at a total cost of
$4,050,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$3,040,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$1,010,000.
(B) Credit toward non-federal share.--The
Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal
share of the project the costs expended by non-
Federal interests for the replacement and
reconstruction of the Soquel Avenue Bridge, if
the Secretary determines that the work is
integral to the project.
(C) Maximum amount of credit.--The credit
under paragraph (B) may not exceed $2,000,000.
(D) Limitation of total project cost.--The
Secretary shall not include the costs to be
credited under paragraphs (B) and (C) in total
project costs in determining the amounts of the
Federal and non-Federal contributions.
* * * * * * *
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004, PUBLIC LAW 108-
137
TITLE II
General Provisions
[Sec. 209. Endangered Species Collaborative Program. (a)
Using funds previously appropriated, the Secretary of the
Interior, acting through the Commissioner of the Bureau of
Reclamation and the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service,
for purposes of improving the efficiency and expediting the
efforts of the Endangered Species Act Collaborative Program
Workgroup, is directed to establish an executive committee of
seven members consisting of--
[(1) one member from the Bureau of Reclamation;
[(2) one member from the Fish and Wildlife Service;
and
[(3) one member at large representing each of the
following seven entities (selected at the discretion of
the entity in consultation with the Bureau of
Reclamation and the Fish and Wildlife Service)
currently participating as signatories to the existing
Memorandum of Understanding:
[(A) other Federal agencies;
[(B) State agencies;
[(C) municipalities;
[(D) universities and environmental groups;
[(E) agricultural communities;
[(F) Middle Rio Grande Pueblos (Sandia,
Isleta, San Felipe, Cochiti, Santa Ana, and
Santo Domingo); and
[(G) Middle Rio Grande Conservancy
District.
[(b) Formation of this Committee shall not occur later than
45 days after enactment of this Act.
[(c) Fiscal year 2004 appropriations shall not be obligated
or expended prior to approval of a detailed spending plan by
the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations.
[(d) The above section shall come into effect within 180
days of enactment of this Act, unless the Bureau of
Reclamation, in consultation with the above listed parties, has
provided an alternative workgroup structure which has been
approved by the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations.]
* * * * * * *
ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006, PUBLIC LAW 109-
103
TITLE I
CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
GENERAL PROVISIONS, CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL
Sec. 117. Lower Mississippi River Museum and Riverfront
Interpretive Site, Mississippi.--The Water Resources
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4811) is amended by--
(1) * * *
(2) in section 103(c)(7)--
(A) by striking ``There is'' and inserting
the following:
``(A) In general.--There is''; and
(B) by striking ``$2,000,000'' and all that
follows and inserting the following:
``[$15,000,000] $26,000,000 to plan, design,
and construct generally in accordance with the
conceptual plan to be prepared by the Corps of
Engineers.
* * * * * * *
Sec. 121. [(a) The Secretary of the Army may carry out and
fund projects to comply with the 2003 Biological Opinion
described in section 205(b) of the Energy and Water Development
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-447; 118 Stat. 2949)
as amended by subsection (b) and may award grants and enter
into contracts, cooperative agreements, or interagency
agreements with participants in the Endangered Species Act
Collaborative Program Workgroup referenced in section 209(a) of
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004
(Public Law 108- 137; 117 Stat. 1850) in order to carry out
such projects. Any project undertaken under this subsection
shall require a non-Federal cost share of 25 percent, which may
be provided through in-kind services or direct cash
contributions and which shall be credited on a programmatic
basis instead of on a project-by-project basis, with
reconciliation of total project costs and total non-Federal
cost share calculated on a three year incremental basis. Non-
Federal cost share that exceeds that which is required in any
calculated three year increment shall be credited to subsequent
three year increments.] (a) Hereafter, the Secretary of the
Army may carry out and fund planning studies, watershed surveys
and assessments, or technical studies at 100 percent Federal
expense to accomplish the purposes of the 2003 Biological
Opinion described in section 205(b) of the Energy and Water
Development Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-447; 118
Stat. 2949) as amended by subsection (b) or any related
subsequent biological opinion, and the collaborative program
long-term plan. In carrying out a study, survey, or assessment
under this subsection, the Secretary of the Army shall consult
with Federal, State, tribal and local governmental entities, as
well as entities participating in the Middle Rio Grande
Endangered Species Collaborative Program referred to in section
205 of this Act: Provided, That the Secretary of the Army may
also provide planning and administrative assistance to the
Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Program,
which shall not be subject to cost sharing requirements with
non-Federal interests.
* * * * * * *
WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007, PUBLIC LAW 110-114
TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS
SEC. 3118. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NEW MEXICO.
(a) * * *
(b) Project Selection.--The Secretary shall select and
shall carry out restoration projects in the Middle Rio Grande
from Cochiti Dam to the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir
in the State of New Mexico in accordance with the plans
recommended in the feasibility report for the Middle Rio Grande
Bosque, New Mexico, scheduled for completion in December 2008.
(c) Local Participation.--In carrying out subsection (b),
the Secretary shall consult with, and consider the activities
being carried out by--
(1) the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act
Collaborative Program; and
(2) the Bosque Improvement Group of the Middle Rio
Grande Bosque Initiative.
(d) Cost Sharing.--Any requirement for non-Federal
participation in a project carried out in the bosque of
Bernalillo County, New Mexico, pursuant to this section shall
be limited to the provision of lands, easements, rights-of-way,
relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for
construction, operation and maintenance of the project.
[(d)] (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is
authorized to be appropriated $25,000,000 to carry out this
section.
* * * * * * *
CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2008, PUBLIC LAW 110-161
DIVISION C--ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIES
APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2008
TITLE I
GENERAL PROVISIONS, CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL
Sec. 115. The Secretary of the Army acting through the
Chief of Engineers is directed to plan, design, and construct a
rural health care facility on the Fort Berthold Indian
Reservation of the Three Affiliated Tribes, North Dakota, at an
estimated Federal cost of [$20,000,000. The Secretary shall
transfer this facility to the Secretary of the Interior for
operation and maintenance upon the completion of construction.]
$20,000,000: Provided, That the Secretary shall transfer
ownership of this facility to the Secretary of Health and Human
Services for operation and maintenance upon the completion of
construction.
* * * * * * *
BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
---------------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
allocation\1\ bill allocation\1\ bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee
allocations to its subcommittees of amounts in the
Budget Resolution for 2009: Subcommittee on Energy
and Water Development:
Mandatory......................................... .............. ........... .............. ...........
Discretionary..................................... 33,258 33,258 32,552 \1\32,378
Projections of outlays associated with the
recommendation:
2009.............................................. .............. ........... .............. \2\19,392
2010.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 9,071
2011.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 2,967
2012.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 728
2013 and future years............................. .............. ........... .............. 1,124
Financial assistance to State and local governments NA 119 NA 24
for 2009............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\2\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
NA: Not applicable.
DISCLOSURE OF CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
The Constitution vests in the Congress the power of the
purse. The Committee believes strongly that Congress should
make the decisions on how to allocate the people's money.
As defined in Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the
Senate, the term ``congressional directed spending item'' means
a provision or report language included primarily at the
request of a Senator, providing, authorizing, or recommending a
specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit
authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan,
loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, or other expenditure
with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific State, locality
or congressional district, other than through a statutory or
administrative, formula-driven, or competitive award process.
For each item, a Member is required to provide a
certification that neither the Member nor the Senator's
immediate family has a pecuniary interest in such
congressionally directed spending item. Such certifications are
available to the public on the website of the Senate Committee
on Appropriations (www.appropriations.senate.gov/senators.cfm).
Following is a list of congressionally directed spending
items included in the Senate recommendation discussed in this
report, along with the name of each Senator who submitted a
request to the Committee of jurisdiction for each item so
identified. Neither the Committee recommendation nor this
report contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff
benefits as defined in rule XLIV.
CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Account Project Funding Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GI............................... ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN-ELM CREEK)................................................. 150,000 Senator Cornyn
GI............................... AGUA FRIA RIVER TRILBY WASH, AZ............................................................ 250,000 Senator Kyl
GI............................... AIWW BRIDGE AT DEEP CREEK, VA.............................................................. 500,000 Senators Warner, Webb
GI............................... ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI.................................................................... 300,000 The President, Senator Inouye
GI............................... AMAZON CREEK, OR........................................................................... 350,000 Senators Wyden, Smith
GI............................... AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA...................................... 250,000 Senator Landrieu
GI............................... ANACOSTIA RIVER & TRIBUTARIES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD....................................... 400,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
GI............................... ANCHORAGE HARBOR DEEPENING, AK............................................................. 500,000 The President, Senator Stevens
GI............................... AUGUSTA, GA................................................................................ 278,000 The President
GI............................... BALTIMORE METRO WTR RES--PATAPSCO AND BACK RIVERS.......................................... 250,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
GI............................... BARROW COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION, AK.................................................. 400,000 The President
GI............................... BASALT, CO................................................................................. 50,000 Senator Salazar
GI............................... BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA...................................................................... 1,599,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... BELPRE, OH................................................................................. 150,000 Senator Voinovich, Brown
GI............................... BLOOMSBURG, PA............................................................................. 700,000 Senators Specter, Casey
GI............................... BOGUE BANKS, NC............................................................................ 132,000 Senator Burr
GI............................... BOLINAS LAGOON ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA................................................... 350,000 Senator Boxer
GI............................... BOSSIER PARISH, LA......................................................................... 200,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA........................................................ 2,300,000 The President
GI............................... BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX.............................................. 400,000 The President, Senator Cornyn
GI............................... BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO................................................................. 274,000 Senators Brownback, Bond
GI............................... BUFFALO RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, NY................................................... 100,000 The President
GI............................... CACHE LA POUDRE, CO........................................................................ 130,000 Senator Salazar
GI............................... CALCASIEU LOCK, LA......................................................................... 600,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA............................................................... 162,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA.................................................................. 67,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA................................................ 900,000 The President
GI............................... CARPINTERIA SHORELINE STUDY................................................................ 443,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... CEDAR RIVER (TIME CHECK AREA), CEDAR RAPIDS, IA............................................ 300,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
GI............................... CENTRALIA, WA.............................................................................. 1,200,000 Senator Murray
GI............................... CHATFIELD, CHERRY CREEK AND BEAR CREEK RESERVOIRS, CO...................................... 200,000 Senators Allard, Salazar
GI............................... CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Murray
GI............................... CHERRY RIVER BASIN, WV..................................................................... 150,000 Senator Byrd
GI............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY MARSHLANDS, MD.............................................................. 1,000,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
GI............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, MARYLAND COASTAL MANAGEMENT...................................... 200,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
GI............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, PA, MD, VA....................... 200,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
GI............................... CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA................................................................. 150,000 Senators Warner, Webb
GI............................... CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN WATERSHED STUDY CT, MA, NH AN...................................... 450,000 Senators Gregg, Dodd, Lieberman
GI............................... COYOTE & BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA.............................................................. 950,000 The President
GI............................... COYOTE DAM, CA............................................................................. 250,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... CROSS LAKE, LA WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS................................................... 250,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... CURRITUCK SOUND, NC........................................................................ 150,000 The President
GI............................... CUYAHOGA RIVER BULKHEAD STUDY, OH.......................................................... 126,000 Senator Voinovich
GI............................... DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX............................................. 1,000,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
GI............................... DELAWARE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE, NJ........................................................... 290,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, PA, DE, & NJ.................................. 125,000 Senator Specter
GI............................... DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II)........................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Durbin
GI............................... DISMAL SWAMP AND DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA.................................................... 262,000 Senators Warner, Webb
GI............................... EASTERN SHORE, MID CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD............................................... 983,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
GI............................... EDISTO ISLAND, SC.......................................................................... 218,000 The President
GI............................... ELIZABETH RIVER, HAMPTON ROADS, VA......................................................... 97,000 The President
GI............................... ELLIOTT BAY SEAWALL........................................................................ 750,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
GI............................... ESPANOLA VALLEY RIO GRANDE AND TRIBS, NM................................................... 400,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
GI............................... FLAGLER BEACH, FL.......................................................................... 250,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
GI............................... FORGE RIVER WATERSHED, LONG ISLAND, NY..................................................... 125,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... FOUR MILE RUN, VA.......................................................................... 300,000 Senators Warner, Webb
GI............................... FREEPORT HARBOR, TX........................................................................ 400,000 The President
GI............................... GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER.......................................................... 150,000 The President
GI............................... GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENT, TX.......................................... 200,000 The President
GI............................... GIWW, PORT O'CONNER TO CORPUS CHRISTI BAY, TX.............................................. 350,000 The President
GI............................... GOLETA BEACH, CA........................................................................... 150,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, MO, KS & AR...................................... 60,000 Senators Brownback, Roberts
GI............................... GRAND LAKE COMPREHENSIVE, OK............................................................... 250,000 Senator Inhofe
GI............................... GREAT LAKES NAV SYST STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, PA..................................... 200,000 The President
GI............................... GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS, MI...................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow, Coleman, Schumer,
Clinton, Voinovich, Brown, Kohl
GI............................... GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX................................................. 223,000 The President
GI............................... HAGATNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL................................................................ 350,000 The President
GI............................... HAMILTON CITY, CA.......................................................................... 500,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NY............................................................. 125,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... HEACOCK AND CACTUS CHANNELS, CA............................................................ 500,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer
GI............................... HILO HARBOR MODIFICATIONS, HI.............................................................. 100,000 Senator Inouye
GI............................... HOCKING RIVER BASIN, MONDAY CREEK, OH...................................................... 300,000 Senator Voinovich
GI............................... HOMER HARBOR MODIFICATION, AK.............................................................. 400,000 Senator Stevens
GI............................... HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ........................................ 204,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, NJ........................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... HUDSON--RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ........................................................... 200,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
GI............................... HUMBOLT BAY LONG TERM SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, CA.............................................. 200,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... HUMBOLT, IA................................................................................ 152,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
GI............................... HYDROELECTRIC POWER ASSESSMENT, HI......................................................... 300,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka
GI............................... ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL....................................................... 400,000 The President
GI............................... INDIANA HARBOR, IN......................................................................... 300,000 The President
GI............................... INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES-MISSISSIPPI RIVER AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES, IL, IN, OH, 300,000 Senator Durbin
WI.
GI............................... JAMES RIVER, SD & ND....................................................................... 350,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
GI............................... JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC..................................................... 300,000 The President
GI............................... KAHUKU, HI................................................................................. 344,000 Senator Inouye
GI............................... KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS...................................................................... 315,000 The President, Senators Bond, Roberts
GI............................... KALAELOA BARBERS POINT HARBOR MODIFICATION, HI............................................. 350,000 Senator Inouye
GI............................... KEITH CREEK, ROCKFORD, IL.................................................................. 548,000 Senator Durbin
GI............................... KENAI RIVER BLUFF EROSION, AK.............................................................. 500,000 Senator Stevens
GI............................... LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY.................................................................... 250,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... LAKE WORTH INLET, FL....................................................................... 200,000 Senator Bill Nelson
GI............................... LANSING, GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, MI............................................ 50,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
GI............................... LITTLE COLORADO RIVER WATERSHED, AZ........................................................ 250,000 Senator Kyl
GI............................... LITTLE KANAWHA RIVER, WV................................................................... 300,000 Senator Byrd
GI............................... LONG ISLAND, MARSH AND JOHNS CREEKS, GA.................................................... 150,000 The President
GI............................... LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA................................................ 590,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer
GI............................... LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA........................................... 10,000,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA (SCIENCE PROGRAM)......................... ................. The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND VICINITY...................................... 200,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer
GI............................... LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX............................................................. 425,000 The President, Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
GI............................... LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION OR & WA......................................... 100,000 The President
GI............................... LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA.................................................................... 400,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer
GI............................... LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE STUDY, AR................................................. 254,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
GI............................... LOWER PLATTE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NE..................................................... 177,000 Seators Ben Nelson, Hagel
GI............................... LOWER POTOMAC ESTUARY WATERSHED, ST MARY'S WATERSHED....................................... 150,000 Senator Cardin
GI............................... LOWER PUYALLUP RIVER ALTERNATIVES STUDY, WA................................................ 57,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
GI............................... LOWER SADDLE RIVER, BERGEN COUNTY, NJ...................................................... 375,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VA.................................................................. 175,000 The President
GI............................... MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HI................................................................... 200,000 The President, Senator Inouye
GI............................... MAHONING RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OH.................................................. 500,000 Senator Voinovich
GI............................... MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA................................................................. 150,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... MANHATTAN, KS.............................................................................. 300,000 Senators Brownback, Roberts
GI............................... MARSH LAKE, MN (MN RIVER AUTHORITY)........................................................ 227,000 Senators Coleman, Klobuchar
GI............................... MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK.............................................................. 400,000 Senator Stevens
GI............................... MATILIJA DAM, CA........................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer
GI............................... MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR................................................................. 250,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
GI............................... MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA................................................... 200,000 The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry
GI............................... MIDDLE CREEK, CA........................................................................... 500,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer
GI............................... MIDDLE POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED, MD, VA, PA, WV, DC......................................... 175,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
GI............................... MIDDLE POTOMAC RIVER--GREATER SENECA/MUDDY BRANCH, MD...................................... 300,000 Senator Cardin
GI............................... MILE POINT, FL............................................................................. 50,000 The President
GI............................... MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN.................................................. 100,000 The President
GI............................... MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED, UMR LAKE ITASCA TO L&D.......................................... 350,000 Senators Coleman, Klobuchar
GI............................... MINNESOTA RIVER BASIN, MN & SD............................................................. 350,000 Senator Coleman
GI............................... MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION STUDY, KS....................................................... 588,000 The President, Senators Bond, Brownback,
Roberts
GI............................... MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L455 & R460-471, MO..................................... 300,000 Senator Bond
GI............................... MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, MO................................................. 3,000,000 Senators Dorgan, Johnson, Baucus, Tester,
Conrad, Thune
GI............................... MONTAUK POINT, NY.......................................................................... 375,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... MONTPELIER, VT............................................................................. 750,000 Senator Leahy
GI............................... NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC...................................................................... 200,000 The President
GI............................... NEW JERSEY SHORE PROTECTION, HEREFORD TO CAPE MAY INLET.................................... 154,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM NOURISHMENT..................................... 150,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA................................................................ 150,000 Senators Warner, Webb
GI............................... NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL PORT, NC...................................................... 100,000 Senators Dole, Burr
GI............................... NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, ASHAROKEN, NY.................................................. 150,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, BAYVILLE, NY................................................... 175,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX........................................................... 650,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
GI............................... OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, OH, PA....................................... 600,000 Senators Byrd, Voinovich
GI............................... PAJARO RIVER, CA........................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer
GI............................... PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ................................................................ 250,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ................................................................ 297,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS.................................................................. 250,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
GI............................... PECKMAN RIVER BASIN AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ.................................................... 375,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, IL.......................................................... 50,000 Senator Durbin
GI............................... PILGRIM LAKE, MA........................................................................... 96,000 The President
GI............................... PINE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR..................................................................... 500,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
GI............................... PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL................................................................. 550,000 The President, Senator Martinez
GI............................... PORT OF IBERIA, LA......................................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... PORTSMOUTH HARBOR & PISCATAQUA RIVER, NH & ME.............................................. 82,000 Senator Gregg
GI............................... PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE, IL................................................................... 200,000 Senator Durbin
GI............................... PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, WA....................................... 1,500,000 The President, Senators Murray, Cantwell
GI............................... RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ..................................................................... 300,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ.............................................. 300,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ............................................... 100,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION BEACH, NJ............................................ 100,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX..................................................................... 350,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
GI............................... RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE.............................................. 300,000 Senators Biden, Carper
GI............................... RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN, ND, SD & MANITOBA, CA.................................... 500,000 Senator Dorgan, Coleman
GI............................... REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA.................................................................... 300,000 Senator Boxer
GI............................... RILLITO RIVER, PIMA COUNTY, AZ............................................................. 275,000 The President
GI............................... RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO & TX.............................................................. 500,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
GI............................... RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX....................................................................... 100,000 The President
GI............................... RIVER DES PERES, MO........................................................................ 150,000 Senator Bond
GI............................... RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAMP, CA.................................................................. 200,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... ROCK CREEK, KEEFER SLOUGH, CA.............................................................. 200,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX........................................................... 400,000 Senator Cornyn
GI............................... SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX................................................................. 500,000 Senator Hutchison
GI............................... SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASINS COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, CA................................ 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer
GI............................... SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA............................................... 2,000,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
GI............................... SAN DIEGO COUNTY SAMP, CA.................................................................. 250,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA............................................................. 200,000 Senator Boxer
GI............................... SAN JOAQUIN RB, WEST STANISLAUS COUNTY, ORESTIMBA CREE..................................... 400,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), FRAZIER CREEK/STRATHMO..................................... 200,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER.................................... 600,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN (SJRB), WHITE RIVER/DRY CREEK...................................... 125,000 Senator Feinstein
GI............................... SAN PABLO BAY WATERSHED, CA................................................................ 250,000 Senator Boxer
GI............................... SANTA FE, NM............................................................................... 28,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
GI............................... SARASOTA, LIDO KEY, FL..................................................................... 158,000 Senator Bill Nelson
GI............................... SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA.............................................................. 700,000 The President, Senator Chambliss
GI............................... SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD/GREENBURGH, NY.................................................. 250,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME....................................................................... 157,000 Senators Snowe, Collins
GI............................... SHREWSBURY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ....................................................... 250,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... SKAGIT RIVER, WA........................................................................... 505,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
GI............................... SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA.................................................................. 375,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
GI............................... SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA............................................................. 171,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
GI............................... SOUTH BOULDER CREEK, CO.................................................................... 252,000 Senators Allard, Salazar
GI............................... SOUTH FORK OF SOUTH BRANCH OF CHICAGO RIVER................................................ 400,000 Senator Durbin
GI............................... SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ....................................................... 375,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA.......................................................... 1,400,000 Senators Feinstein,Boxer
GI............................... SOUTH SHORE OF STATEN ISLAND, NY........................................................... 200,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK................................................ 500,000 Senator Inhofe
GI............................... SOUTHWEST COASTAL HURRICANE PROTECTION, LA................................................. 1,500,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... SOUTHWEST, ARKANSAS, AR.................................................................... 327,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
GI............................... SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX.................................................. 150,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
GI............................... ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL....................................................................... 250,000 Senator Bill Nelson
GI............................... ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA................................................. 500,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR MANAGEMENT PLAN, MI..................................... 200,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
GI............................... ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA............................................... 250,000 Senator Landrieu
GI............................... STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ..................................................... 250,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC...................................................... 386,000 Senators Dole, Burr
GI............................... SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION STUDY, MD, PA, & 300,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
NY.
GI............................... SUTTER COUNTY (Northern California Streams), CA............................................ 339,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
GI............................... TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING, CA AND NV......................................................... 125,000 Senators Reid, Feinstein, Ensign
GI............................... TEN MILE RIVER, NY AND CT.................................................................. 125,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... TOPEKA, KS................................................................................. 100,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
GI............................... TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV........................................................................ 5,000,000 Senators Reid, Ensign
GI............................... TYBEE ISLAND CHANNEL, GA................................................................... 250,000 The President, Senator Chambliss, Isakson
GI............................... UPPER DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED, NY......................................................... 300,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... UPPER MISS RIVER--ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO....................................... 10,000,000 Senators Harkin, Bond, Grassley, Coleman,
Klobuchar
GI............................... UPPER MISS RVR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IL, IA, MO, MN & WI..................................... 220,000 Senators Durbin, Harkin, Bond, Grassley
GI............................... UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION STUDY, PA............................................................ 4,200,000 Senators Byrd, Specter, Casey
GI............................... UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA................................................................. 191,000 The President
GI............................... UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA (PHASE II).................................................... 200,000 Senators Warner, Webb
GI............................... UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS..................................................................... 150,000 Senator Brownback
GI............................... VA SHLY-AY AKIMEL SALT RIVER RESTORATION, AZ............................................... 658,000 The President
GI............................... VALDEZ HARBOR EXPANSION, AK................................................................ 150,000 Senators Stevens, Murkowski
GI............................... VICINITY AND WILOUGHBY SPIT, VA............................................................ 200,000 Senators Warner, Webb
GI............................... WAILUPE STREAM, OAHU, HI................................................................... 300,000 Senator Inouye
GI............................... WALLA WALLA RIVER WATERSHED, OR & WA....................................................... 500,000 Senators Murray, Wyden, Smith, Cantwell
GI............................... WALTON COUNTY, FL.......................................................................... 591,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
GI............................... WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK.................................................................... 250,000 Senator Inhofe
GI............................... WATERTOWN, SD.............................................................................. 450,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
GI............................... WAUWATOSA, WI.............................................................................. 200,000 Senator Kohl
GI............................... WEST SHORE, LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA......................................................... 900,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... WESTCHESTER COUNTY STREAMS, NY............................................................. 175,000 Senator Schumer
GI............................... WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, BLANCHARD RIVER WATERSHED, OH, IN, & MI........................... 250,000 Senator Voinovich
GI............................... WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI...................................................... 250,000 Senator Voinovich
GI............................... WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO................................................... 500,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
GI............................... WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR................................................... 325,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
GI............................... WILD RICE RIVER, RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, MN.......................................... 271,000 The President, Senator Coleman
GI............................... WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR................................................ 240,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
GI............................... YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK......................................................................... 700,000 The President
GI............................... YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT............................................................. 500,000 The President, Senators Baucus, Tester
GI............................... ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE INVESTIGATIONS............................................... ................. The President
GI............................... COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION.............................................................. 5,600,000 The President
GI............................... Coastal Data Information Program....................................................... (1,000,000) Senators Feinstein, Cantwell
GI............................... Pacific Island Land Ocean Typhoon Experiment, HI....................................... (1,000,000) Senator Inouye
GI............................... Surge and Wave Island Modeling Studies, HI............................................. (1,200,000) Senator Inouye
GI............................... Wave Data Study........................................................................ (1,000,000) Senators Biden, Carper
GI............................... COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS................................................. 100,000 The President
GI............................... ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES................................................................. 75,000 The President
GI............................... FEME/MAP MOD COORDINATION.................................................................. 1,500,000 The President
GI............................... FLOOD DAMAGE DATA PROGRAM.................................................................. 220,000 The President
GI............................... FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES............................................................ 11,000,000 The President
GI............................... City of Gretna, LA (GIS)............................................................... (254,000) Senator Landrieu
GI............................... East Baton Rouge Parish, LA (GIS)...................................................... (400,000) Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... Hurricane Evacuation Studies, Hawaii................................................... (1,000,000) Senator Inouye
GI............................... Iowa Multi-State Dam Safety Analyses, Iowa............................................. (37,000) Senator Grassley
GI............................... Kekaha Flood Study, HI................................................................. (100,000) Senators Inouye, Akaka
GI............................... Little Sioux Watershed, IA............................................................. (30,000) Senator Grassley
GI............................... Livingston Parish, LA (GIS)............................................................ (735,000) Senators Landrieu, Vitter
GI............................... Mon-Maq Dam Removal Study & Local Floodplain Master Planning, Monticello, IA........... (100,000) Senator Grassley
GI............................... Papillion Creek Watershed, Flood Plain Mapping, Nebraska............................... (500,000) Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel
GI............................... Southeastern, PA....................................................................... (300,000) Senators Specter, Casey
GI............................... HYDROLOGIC STUDIES......................................................................... 250,000 The President
GI............................... INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW.................................................................... 1,000,000 The President
GI............................... INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES................................................................ 200,000 The President
GI............................... NATIONAL SHORELINE STUDY................................................................... 375,000 The President
GI............................... OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS................................................................ 4,580,000 The President
GI............................... Lake Tahoe Coordination................................................................ (500,000) Senators Reid, Feinstein, Ensign
GI............................... PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES.............................................................. 8,750,000 The President
GI............................... Asheville, NC.......................................................................... (50,000) Senator Dole
GI............................... Assessment of Bridges and Impacts on Flows and Flooding, Delaware County, NY........... (150,000) Senator Schumer
GI............................... Bacon Creek, Sioux City, IA............................................................ (50,000) Senator Grassley
GI............................... Boyer River, Missouri Valley, IA....................................................... (13,000) Senator Grassley
GI............................... Choctaw County Reservoir, MS........................................................... (100,000) Senator Wicker
GI............................... Delaware Estuary Salinity Monitoring Study, Delaware & New Jersey...................... (200,000) Senator Lautenberg, Menendez
GI............................... Fife Lake Aquatic Weed Control, MI..................................................... (300,000) Senator Levin, Stabenow
GI............................... Jones County Water Supply, MS.......................................................... (50,000) Senator Wicker
GI............................... Kansas River Basin Technical Assistance, Kansas........................................ (400,000) Senator Brownback
GI............................... Little Sioux Watershed, IA............................................................. (30,000) Senator Grassley
GI............................... Mississippi Band of Choctaws, MS....................................................... (50,000) Senator Wicker
GI............................... PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM................................................................... 3,100,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Schumer
GI............................... PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE)........................................... 225,000 The President
GI............................... REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT..................................... 150,000 The President
GI............................... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................................................................... 28,000,000 The President, Senator Cochran
GI............................... Submerged Aquatic Vegetation, Maryland................................................. (1,000,000) Senator Cardin
GI............................... SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS............................................... 50,000 The President
GI............................... STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY)..................................................... 600,000 The President
GI............................... TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM...................................................................... 350,000 The President
GI............................... TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM................................................................. 1,000,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
GI............................... TRI-SERVICE CADD/GIS TECHNOLOGY CENTER..................................................... 350,000 The President
GI............................... WATER RESOURCES PRIORITIES STUDY........................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM............................................................. 2,400,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
CG............................... AKUTAN HARBOR, AK.......................................................................... 3,000,000 Senator Stevens
CG............................... ALAMOGORDO, NM............................................................................. 4,200,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
CG............................... ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK................................................................. 4,500,000 Senators Stevens, Murkowski
CG............................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON FEATURES), CA............................................. 13,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS), CA.................................... 9,000,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
CG............................... AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM RAISE), CA............................................ 2,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (PHASE I), MD & DC......................................... 30,000 Senator Cardin
CG............................... ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NE................................................................ 4,828,000 The President, Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel
CG............................... ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD 1.................................................................... 1,900,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin
CG............................... ATLANTA (EI), GA........................................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Chambliss, Isakson
CG............................... ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY....................................... 100,000 Senator Schumer
CG............................... ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD............................................................. 200,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
CG............................... ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY & JAMAICA BAY, NY................... 750,000 Senator Schumer
CG............................... ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT, NY.................................. 3,800,000 Senator Schumer
CG............................... BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER RESOURCES, GWYNNS FALLS, MD................................... 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
CG............................... BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR (NJ SHORE PROTECTION), NJ.............................. 11,700,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD........................................................... 4,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
CG............................... BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO.......................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Bond
CG............................... BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO........................................................ 1,700,000 The President, Senator Bond
CG............................... BLUESTONE LAKE (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), WV.................................................. 12,000,000 The President, Senator Byrd
CG............................... BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX................................................................... 5,382,000 The President, Senator Cornyn
CG............................... BRECKENRIDGE, MN........................................................................... 2,877,000 Senators Dorgan, Coleman, Klobuchar
CG............................... BREVARD COUNTY (MID REACH), FL............................................................. 500,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
CG............................... BRIDGEPORT ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, CT................................................ 500,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
CG............................... BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET (ABSECON), NJ................................... 3,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, BRIGANTINE, NJ................................. 80,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC (Ocean Isle).................................................. 250,000 Senators Dole, Burr
CG............................... BURLINGTON HARBOR, VT...................................................................... 500,000 Senator Leahy
CG............................... CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM............................................................. 5,000,000 Senator Feinstein
CG............................... CANTON LAKE (DAM SAFETY), OK............................................................... 21,200,000 The President
CG............................... CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ 1..................................................... 2,500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... CEDAR HAMMOCK, WARES CREEK, FL............................................................. 2,773,000 The President, Senator, Martinez
CG............................... CENTER HILL DAM (SEEPAGE CONTROL), TN...................................................... 53,400,000 The President, Alexander, Corker
CG............................... CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL........................................................... 95,188,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
CG............................... CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX.................................... 500,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
CG............................... CENTRAL NEW MEXICO, NM..................................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
CG............................... CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER (DEF CORR), IL..................................... 2,500,000 The President, Senator Durbin
CG............................... CHARLESTOWN, MD............................................................................ 50,000 Senator Mikulski
CG............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION, MD, VA & PA....................... 2,500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin, Warner, Webb
CG............................... CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & VA.................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin, Warner, Webb
CG............................... CHESTERFIELD, MO........................................................................... 3,000,000 Senator Bond
CG............................... CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX, SD.......................................... 4,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
CG............................... CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL..................................... 5,750,000 The President, Senators Durbin, Levin,
Stabenow, Coleman, Voinovich, Brown, Kohl
CG............................... CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, SECOND BARRIER, IL........................................ 500,000 The President, Senators Durbin, Levin,
Stabenow, Coleman, Voinovich, Brown, Kohl
CG............................... CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL...................................................................... 4,000,000 The President, Senator Durbin
CG............................... CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN...................................................... 42,000,000 The President, Alexander, Corker
CG............................... CHIEF JOSEPH DAM GAS ABATEMENT, WA 1....................................................... 2,500,000 The President, Senator Murray
CG............................... CLEARWATER LAKE (SEEPAGE CONTROL), MO...................................................... 25,000,000 The President
CG............................... COLUMBIA RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, OR & WA............................................... 36,000,000 The President, Senators Murray, Crapo, Wyden,
Smith, Cantwell
CG............................... COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR & ID 1.............................................. 92,000,000 The President, Senator Murray
CG............................... COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA........................................ 2,455,000 The President, Senators Murray, Wyden, Smith,
Cantwell
CG............................... COMITE RIVER, LA........................................................................... 10,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
CG............................... CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX............................................................ 2,000,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
CG............................... CROOKSTON, MN.............................................................................. 300,000 The President, Senator Klobuchar
CG............................... CUMBERLAND, MD............................................................................. 200,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
CG............................... DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX....................................... 13,000,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
CG............................... DAVENPORT, IA.............................................................................. 4,850,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
CG............................... DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT INLET TO LEWES BEACH, DE 1............................... 350,000 The President
CG............................... DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE.............................................................. 390,000 Senators Biden, Carper
CG............................... DELAWARE RIVER MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, NJ, PA & DE......................................... 5,000,000 Senators Specter, Casey
CG............................... DES MOINES AND RACCOON RIVERS, IA.......................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
CG............................... DES MOINES RECREATION RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA.............................................. 3,900,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
CG............................... DES PLAINES RIVER, IL...................................................................... 8,000,000 The President, Senator Durbin
CG............................... DESOTO COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM, MS............................................... 4,860,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
CG............................... DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA......................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
CG............................... EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA (FC)........................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Landrieu
CG............................... EAST ST LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL............................................................. 375,000 Senator Durbin
CG............................... EAST ST LOUIS, IL.......................................................................... 1,207,000 The President, Senator Durbin
CG............................... ELK CREEK LAKE, OR......................................................................... 3,120,000 The President
CG............................... EMSWORTH L&D, OHIO RIVER (STATIC INSTABILITY CORRECTION), PA............................... 25,800,000 The President, Senators Specter, Casey
CG............................... EVERGLADES AND S. FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL........................................ 3,797,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
CG............................... FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY....................................................... 500,000 The President
CG............................... FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY..................................................... 2,150,000 Senator Schumer
CG............................... FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS, FL................................................ 2,200,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
CG............................... FOLLY BEACH, SC 1.......................................................................... 35,000 The President
CG............................... FT. PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT.............................................................. 1,500,000 Senators Baucus, Tester
CG............................... GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT (REPLACEMENT), ND............................................. 3,500,000 The President
CG............................... GENESEE COUNTY, MI......................................................................... 600,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
CG............................... GRAYS LANDING LOCK AND DAM, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA.......................................... 600,000 The President
CG............................... GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET TO PECK BEACH (OCEAN CITY), NJ...................................... 3,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... GREAT EGG HARBOR TO TOWNSENDS INLET, NJ.................................................... 250,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, MI.......................................... 2,500,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow, Coleman, Voinovich
CG............................... GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV................................................................. 1,500,000 Senator Byrd
CG............................... GUADALUPE RIVER, CA........................................................................ 5,000,000 Senator Feinstein
CG............................... HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ................................................................. 100,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... HAINES BOAT HARBOR, AK..................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Stevens
CG............................... HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS RESTORATION, CA................................................. 4,900,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... HARBOR/SOUTH BAY WATER RECYCLING STUDY, LOS ANGELES, CA.................................... 3,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... HERBERT HOOVER DIKE (SEEPAGE CONTROL) , FL................................................. 77,400,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
CG............................... HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Cornyn
CG............................... HOUSTON-GALVESTON NAVIGATION CHANNELS, TX.................................................. 19,700,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
CG............................... HOWARD HANSON DAM ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, WA 1.............................................. 15,000,000 The President, Senator Murray
CG............................... IAO STREAMS, HI............................................................................ 500,000 Senators Inouye, Akaka
CG............................... ILLINOIS WATERWAY, LOCKPORT LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), IL................................. 28,600,000 The President
CG............................... INDIANA HARBOR (CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY), IN 1.......................................... 8,385,000 The President
CG............................... INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK REPLACEMENT, LA......................................... 2,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
CG............................... ISLAND CREEK BASIN IN AND AROUND LOGAN, WV................................................. 200,000 Senator Byrd
CG............................... J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA........................................................... 8,500,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
CG............................... JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL.................................................................... 3,500,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
CG............................... JAMES RIVER DEEPWATER TURNING BASIN, VA.................................................... 1,763,000 Senator Warner, Webb
CG............................... JOHN H KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR (REPLACEMENT), VA & NC....................................... 14,000,000 The President
CG............................... JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ARLINGTON, TX.......................................... 2,000,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
CG............................... JOSEPH G MINISH HISTORIC WATERFRONT PARK, NJ............................................... 4,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... KAWEAH RIVER, CA........................................................................... 1,000,000 The President
CG............................... KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE RIVER, KY................................................. 22,330,000 The President, Senator McConnell
CG............................... KISSIMMEE RIVER, FL........................................................................ 31,015,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
CG............................... LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA............................................................. 4,782,000 Senators Specter, Casey
CG............................... LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATE, VT...................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Leahy
CG............................... LAKE SAKAKAWEA PROJECT, ND................................................................. 17,048,000 Senator Dorgan
CG............................... LAKE WORTH SAND TRANSFER PLANT, FL 1....................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Bill Nelson
CG............................... LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (CG)........................................................... 2,500,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
CG............................... LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA & KY............................... 16,500,000 Senators Byrd, Warner, Webb
CG............................... LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN................................................................... 8,000,000 The President
CG............................... LLAGAS CREEK, CA........................................................................... 400,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... LOCK & DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RIVER (REHABILITATION), IL 1.................................... 2,598,000 The President, Senators Durbin, Bond
CG............................... LOCK AND DAM 11, MISSISSIPPI RIVER (MAJOR REHAB), IA 1..................................... 2,750,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley
CG............................... LOCK AND DAM 3, MISSISSIPPI RIVER (MAJOR REHAB) , MN....................................... 2,000,000 Senator Coleman
CG............................... LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3, AND 4, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA.......................................... 19,050,000 The President, Senators Specter, Casey
CG............................... LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA....................................................... 5,700,000 The President
CG............................... LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NJ 1............................................... 150,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, OR & WA........................................ 1,500,000 The President, Senator Murray
CG............................... LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA.......................................................... ................. The President, Senator Murray
CG............................... LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV................................................................ 1,050,000 Senator Byrd
CG............................... LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION, WA, OR 1................................... 1,500,000 The President
CG............................... LYNCHBURG CSO, VA.......................................................................... 300,000 Senator Warner, Webb
CG............................... MARKLAND LOCKS & DAM, KY & IL 1............................................................ 10,600,000 The President
CG............................... MARMET LOCK, KANAWHA RIVER, WV............................................................. 9,000,000 The President, Senator Byrd
CG............................... MCALPINE LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, KY & IN................................................ 6,270,000 The President, Senator McConnell
CG............................... MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL......................................................... 34,000,000 The President, Senator Durbin
CG............................... METROPOLITAN REGION OF CINCINNATI, DUCK CREEK, OH.......................................... 4,000,000 The President, Senator Brown
CG............................... MIAMI HARBOR CHANNEL DEEPENING, FL......................................................... 500,000 Senator Martinez
CG............................... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM................................ 800,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
CG............................... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE RESTORATION, NM.......................................................... 24,016,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
CG............................... MID-VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, CA................................................... 1,500,000 Senator Feinstein
CG............................... MILWAUKEE HARBOR CDF EXPANSION, WI......................................................... 1,600,000 Senator Kohl
CG............................... MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO..................................... 5,011,000 The President, Senator Bond
CG............................... MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, MS............................................... 18,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
CG............................... MISSOURI & MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT, MO....................................... 1,500,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley, Hagel
CG............................... MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE & SD.............................................. 1,000,000 Senator Hagel
CG............................... MISSOURI R FISH AND WILDLIFE RECOVERY, IA,KS,MO,MT,NE & ND 1............................... 70,000,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley,
Baucus, Tester
CG............................... MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (L-385), MO, IA, NE & KS....................................... 2,600,000 Senator Bond
CG............................... MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND............................................................. 1,000,000 Senator Conrad
CG............................... MOBILE HARBOR TURNING BASIN, AL............................................................ 3,400,000 Senators Shelby, Sessions
CG............................... MT ST HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.......................................................... 4,410,000 The President, Senator Murray
CG............................... MUD MOUNTAIN DAM (FISH PASSAGE), WA........................................................ 1,000,000 The President, Senator Murray
CG............................... MUDDY RIVER, MA............................................................................ 5,000,000 The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry
CG............................... MURRIETA CREEK, CA......................................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... NAPA RIVER, CA............................................................................. 11,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... NEGAUNEE, MI............................................................................... 500,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
CG............................... NEW MEXICO (Environmental Infrastructure), NM.............................................. 7,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
CG............................... NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & NJ.................................................... 85,000,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
CG............................... NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY................................................................ 1,000,000 Senator Schumer
CG............................... NOGALES WASH, AZ (Chula Vista)............................................................. 3,000,000 Senator Kyl
CG............................... NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA................................................ 1,000,000 Senator Warner, Webb
CG............................... NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ND.............................................. 10,000,000 Senator Dorgan
CG............................... NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL.................................................... 300,000 Senator Durbin
CG............................... OAKLAND HARBOR (50 FOOT PROJECT), CA....................................................... 24,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL & KY................................................. 114,000,000 The President, Senator McConnell
CG............................... OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA.................................................................. 1,600,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
CG............................... OZARK-JETA TAYLOR POWERHOUSE (MAJOR REHAB), AR............................................. 17,300,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
CG............................... PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL.................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Bill Nelson
CG............................... PASSAIC RIVER PRESERVATION OF NATURAL STORAGE AREAS, NJ.................................... 1,500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... PERRY CREEK, IA............................................................................ 3,800,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
CG............................... PETALUMA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, CA........................................................... 350,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... PINHOOK CREEK, HUNTSVILLE, AL.............................................................. 1,400,000 Senator Shelby
CG............................... POINT MARION, LOCK AND DAM8, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA & WV.................................... 150,000 The President
CG............................... POPLAR ISLAND, MD 1........................................................................ 12,000,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin
CG............................... PORT OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR MAIN CHANNEL DEEPENING, CA...................................... 885,000 Senator Feinstein
CG............................... PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR............................................................ 43,000,000 The President
CG............................... PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA (PERMANENT), PA..................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Specter, Casey
CG............................... PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, WA............................................ 621,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
CG............................... RAMAPO AND MAHWAH RIVERS, MAHWAH, NJ AND SUFFERN, NY....................................... 500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez, Schumer
CG............................... RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT MONMOUTH, NJ.......................................... 2,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ............................................. 10,000,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK.................................................. 1,500,000 Senator Inhofe
CG............................... RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM AR, LA & TX.................................................... 2,500,000 Senators Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter
CG............................... RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, AR & LA............................................... 4,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter
CG............................... RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC.................................................... 1,450,000 The President
CG............................... RICHMOND CSO, VA........................................................................... 300,000 Senator Warner, Webb
CG............................... RIO DE FLAG FLAGSTAFF, AZ.................................................................. 3,000,000 Senator Kyl
CG............................... RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM................................... 800,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
CG............................... RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR....................................................................... 12,000,000 The President
CG............................... ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS AREA, VA............................................. 1,075,000 The President, Senator Warner, Webb
CG............................... ROBERT C BYRD LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, WV & OH........................................... 1,000,000 The President
CG............................... RURAL IDAHO, ID............................................................................ 4,000,000 Senators Craig, Crapo
CG............................... RURAL MONTANA, MT.......................................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Baucus, Tester
CG............................... RURAL UTAH, UT (EI)........................................................................ 12,000,000 Senators Bennett, Hatch
CG............................... RURAL, NV (EI)............................................................................. 18,000,000 Senators Reid, Ensign
CG............................... SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA...................................................... 900,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
CG............................... SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT, CA............................................... 23,968,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GRR, CA.................................................... 500,000 Senator Feinstein
CG............................... SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA..................................... 500,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX........................................................ 10,000,000 Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
CG............................... SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA.......................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA..................................................................... 750,000 Senator Feinstein
CG............................... SAN RAMON VALLEY RECYCLED WATER, CA........................................................ 3,500,000 Senator Feinstein
CG............................... SAND CREEK WATERSHED, SAUNDERS COUNTY, NE.................................................. 2,400,000 Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel
CG............................... SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ........................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA............................................................... 14,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... SANTA MARIA RIVER, CA...................................................................... 6,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... SAULT STE MARIE, MI........................................................................ 2,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
CG............................... SEWARD HARBOR BREAKWATER EXTENSION......................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Stevens
CG............................... SHOALWATER BAY SHORELINE, WA............................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Murray
CG............................... SIMS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX.................................................................... 21,465,000 The President, Senator Cornyn
CG............................... SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA........................................................ 12,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... SOUTHWEST VALLEY ALBUQUERQUE, NM........................................................... 8,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
CG............................... ST LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO.............................................................. 3,750,000 The President, Senator Bond
CG............................... ST PAUL HARBOR, AK......................................................................... 2,000,000 Senator Stevens
CG............................... ST. LUCIE INLET, FL........................................................................ 4,000,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
CG............................... STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV................................................................. 900,000 The President
CG............................... SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (DAM SAFETY), CA................................................... 8,000,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... SUCCESS DAM, TULE RIVER (ENLARGEMENT), CA.................................................. 500,000 Senator Feinstein
CG............................... SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS CITY, MO................................................ 2,000,000 Senator Bond
CG............................... TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA................................................................ 3,000,000 Senators Reid, Feinstein, Ensign
CG............................... TAMPA HARBOR, FL........................................................................... 500,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
CG............................... TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX..................................................................... 3,000,000 Senator Hutchison
CG............................... TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ...................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
CG............................... TRES RIOS, AZ.............................................................................. 3,000,000 Senator Kyl
CG............................... TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KS & MO................................................................ 10,000,000 The President, Senators Bond, Roberts
CG............................... TUSCALOOSA, AL............................................................................. 7,500,000 Senator Shelby
CG............................... TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS (DAM SAFETY)......................................................... 23,800,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
CG............................... UNALASKA, AK............................................................................... 6,000,000 Senators Stevens, Murkowski
CG............................... UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA.................................................................. 5,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI................................... 18,000,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley,
Coleman
CG............................... UPPER NEWPORT BAY, CA...................................................................... 3,000,000 Senator Feinstein
CG............................... VIRGINIA BEACH (HURRICANE PROTECTION), VA.................................................. 3,000,000 Senator Warner, Webb
CG............................... WEST SACRAMENTO, CA........................................................................ 2,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND CLEAR CREEK, NE................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel
CG............................... WHITE RIVER MINIMUM FLOW, AR............................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
CG............................... WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, OR 1................................................. 3,331,000 The President
CG............................... WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...................................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Dole, Burr
CG............................... WOLF CREEK (SEEPAGE CONTROL), KY........................................................... 57,000,000 The President, Senators McConnell, Alexander,
Corker
CG............................... WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL....................................................................... 3,700,000 The President, Senator Durbin
CG............................... WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC..................................................................... 300,000 Senators Dole, Burr
CG............................... WYOMING VALLEY (LEVEE RAISING), PA......................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Specter, Casey
CG............................... YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA....................................................................... 3,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... ABANDONED MINE RESTORATION................................................................. 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
CG............................... AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL...................................................................... 4,550,000 The President, Senators Leahy, Schumer, Dole
CG............................... DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY CORRECTION PROGRAM........................................ 48,650,000 The President
CG............................... Dam Safety Assurance Studies............................................................... ................. .............................................
CG............................... Cherry Creek Dam, CO................................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Dworshak Dam, ID....................................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Isabella Dam, CA....................................................................... ................. The President, Senator Feinstein
CG............................... John Day Lock and Dam, OR & WA......................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Martis Creek Dam, CA & NV.............................................................. ................. The President, Senator Ensign
CG............................... Mississippi Lock and Dam 25, MO........................................................ ................. The President
CG............................... Seepage/Stability Correction Major Rehabilitation Studies.................................. ................. .............................................
CG............................... Addicks Dam, Buffalo Bayou, TX......................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Ball Mountain Dam, VT.................................................................. ................. The President
CG............................... Beach City Dam, OH..................................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Bolivar Dam, OH........................................................................ ................. The President
CG............................... East Branch Dam, Clarion River, PA..................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Green River Lake Dam, KY............................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Hidden Dam, CA......................................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Hop Brook Dam, CT...................................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... J. Edward Roush Dam, KY................................................................ ................. The President
CG............................... Keystone lake Dam, OK.................................................................. ................. The President
CG............................... Lake Shelbyville Dam, IL............................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Lewisville Dam, TX..................................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Mansfield Hollow Dam, CT............................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Mohawk Dam, OH......................................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Montgomery Locks and Dam, PA........................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Nolin Lake dam, KY..................................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Rough River Lake Dam, KY............................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Salamonie Lake Dam, KY................................................................. ................. The President
CG............................... Whittier Narrows Dam, CA............................................................... ................. The President
CG............................... Zoar Levee (Dover Dam), OH............................................................. ................. The President
CG............................... DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITIES PROGRAM (DMDF)........................................ 8,965,000 The President
CG............................... Charleston Harbor, SC 1................................................................ ................. The President, Senator Graham
CG............................... Green Bay Harbor, WI 1................................................................. ................. The President, Senator Kohl
CG............................... Rouge River, MI 1...................................................................... ................. The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
CG............................... Savannah Harbor, GA 1.................................................................. ................. The President
CG............................... EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION FUND................................................................ 21,000,000 The President
CG............................... ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC LAW 106-457)........................................... 1,000,000 The President
CG............................... INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (BOARD EXPENSES)............................................... 50,000 The President
CG............................... INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (COE EXP)...................................................... 250,000 The President
CG............................... SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.............................. 875,000 Inouye
CG............................... CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM............................................................. ................. .............................................
Section 14....................... EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (SECTION 14)................................. 10,000,000 The President
Section 208...................... SNAGGING AND CLEARING (SECTION 208)........................................................ 500,000 The President
Section 208...................... Blackwell Lake, Blackwell, OK.......................................................... ................. The President
Section 208...................... Muscatatuck River Log Jam, Scott County, IN............................................ ................. The President
Section 208...................... Oran, MO............................................................................... ................. The President
Section 103...................... SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103)............................................................. 7,500,000 The President
Section 103...................... Athol Springs, Lake Erie, NY........................................................... ................. The President
Section 103...................... Bay Farm Dike, CA...................................................................... ................. Senator Feinstein
Section 103...................... Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, Hampton, VA.................................................. ................. The President
Section 103...................... Ft. San Geronimo, PR................................................................... ................. The President
Section 103...................... Lake Erie at Painesville, OH........................................................... ................. The President
Section 103...................... Lasalle Park, Buffalo, NY.............................................................. ................. The President
Section 103...................... Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA........................................................ ................. The President
Section 103...................... Old Lakeshore Road, NY................................................................. ................. The President
Section 103...................... Philadelphia Shipyard Sea Wall, Philadelphia, PA....................................... ................. The President
Section 103...................... Pismo Beach, CA........................................................................ ................. Senator Feinstein
Section 103...................... Unalakleet Storm Damage Reduction, Unalakleet, AK...................................... ................. The President, Senator Stevens
Section 103...................... Veteran's Drive Shoreline, St. Thomas, USVI............................................ ................. The President
Section 107...................... NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107)........................................................... ................. The President
Section 107...................... Bass Harbor, ME........................................................................ ................. Snowe, Collins
Section 107...................... Charlestown Breachway and Inlet, RI.................................................... ................. The President
Section 107...................... Fairless Hills Turning Basin, PA....................................................... ................. Senators Specter, Casey
Section 107...................... Grand Marais Harbor of Refuge, MN...................................................... ................. Senator Coleman
Section 107...................... Hampton Harbor, NH..................................................................... ................. Senator Gregg
Section 107...................... Mackinac Isle, Harbor Breakwall, MI.................................................... ................. The President
Section 107...................... McQuade Road Harbor of Refuge, Duluth, MN.............................................. ................. Senators Coleman, Klobuchar
Section 107...................... Nassawadox Creek, VA................................................................... ................. The President
Section 107...................... North Kohala Navigation Improvements, HI............................................... ................. Senators Inouye, Akaka
Section 107...................... Northwest Tennessee Harbor, TN......................................................... ................. Senators Alexander, Corker
Section 107...................... Northwestern Michigan, Traverse City, MI............................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
Section 107...................... Ontonagon Channel Extension, MI........................................................ ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
Section 107...................... Ottawa River Navigation, Toledo, OH.................................................... ................. Senator Voinovich
Section 107...................... Port Fourchon Extension, Lafourche Parish, LA.......................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Section 107...................... Round Pond, Bristol, ME................................................................ ................. Snowe, Collins
Section 107...................... Savoonga Harbor, AK.................................................................... ................. The President
Section 107...................... St. Jerome Creek, MD................................................................... ................. Senator Cardin
Section 111...................... MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES (SECTION 111) 1................................................ 10,000,000 The President
Section 111...................... Camp Ellis Restoration Project, ME..................................................... ................. The President, Senators Snowe, Collins
Section 111...................... Fairport Harbor, OH.................................................................... ................. The President, Senator Voinovich
Section 111...................... Mattituck Harbor, NY................................................................... ................. The President, Senator Schumer
Section 111...................... Mobile Pass, AL........................................................................ ................. The President
Section 111...................... Tybee Island Channel Impacts, GA....................................................... ................. The President
Section 111...................... Vermillion, OH......................................................................... ................. The President
Sections 204, 207, 933........... BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204, 207, 933) 1.............................. 7,187,000 The President
Sections 204, 207, 933........... 21st Avenue West Channel, Duluth, MN................................................... ................. The President
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Atchafalaya River, Shell Island, St. Mary Parish, LA................................... ................. Senator Landrieu
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Barataria Bay Waterway, LA............................................................. ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Blackhawk Bottoms, IA.................................................................. ................. The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Calcasieu River, Cameron Parish, LA.................................................... ................. The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Isle Aux Herbes, AL.................................................................... ................. The President
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Maumee Bay Restoration, OH............................................................. ................. The President
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Newburyport Harbor, MA................................................................. ................. Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Restoration of the Cat Islands Chain, Green Bay, WI.................................... ................. The President, Senator Kohl
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Shell Island Pass, LA.................................................................. ................. The President
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Wanchese Marsh Creation, NC............................................................ ................. The President
Sections 204, 207, 933........... Wynn Road, Oregon, OH.................................................................. ................. The President
Section 205...................... FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205)....................................................... 43,123,000 The President
Section 205...................... Ada, MN................................................................................ ................. Senators Coleman, Klobuchar
Section 205...................... Assunpink Creek, Hamiliton Township, Mercer County, NJ................................. ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 205...................... Bayou Choupique, St Mary Parish, LA.................................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Section 205...................... Bayou Queue de Tortue, Vermillion Parish, LA........................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Section 205...................... Beaver Creek & Tribs, Bristol, TN...................................................... ................. The President, Senator Alexander
Section 205...................... Blacksnake Creek, St. Joseph, MO....................................................... ................. The President, Senator Bond
Section 205...................... Concordia, KS.......................................................................... ................. Senators Brownback, Roberts
Section 205...................... Cosgrove Creek, Calaveras County, CA................................................... ................. Senator Feinstein
Section 205...................... Crosscreek, Rossville, KS.............................................................. ................. Senators Brownback, Roberts
Section 205...................... Duck Creek Flood Warning System, OH.................................................... ................. The President
Section 205...................... Elkton, MD............................................................................. ................. Senator Mikulski
Section 205...................... Eureka Creek, Mannhattan, KS........................................................... ................. Senator Brownback
Section 205...................... Findley, OH............................................................................ ................. Senators Voinovich, Brown
Section 205...................... Granite Falls, MN...................................................................... ................. Senators Coleman, Klobuchar
Section 205...................... Hatch, NM.............................................................................. ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Section 205...................... Hopkinsville, Little River, KY......................................................... ................. Senator McConnell
Section 205...................... Independence, OH....................................................................... ................. Senator Voinovich
Section 205...................... Indian/Dry Creek Cedar Rapids, IA...................................................... ................. Senators Harkin, Grassley
Section 205...................... Jackson Brook, Morris County, NJ....................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 205...................... Jewett Brook, Laconia, NH.............................................................. (100,000) Senator Gregg
Section 205...................... Keopu-Hienaloli Strm, HI............................................................... ................. The President
Section 205...................... Kings Point, Warren County, MS......................................................... ................. Senators Cochran, Wicker
Section 205...................... Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, HI.............................................................. ................. Senator Inouye
Section 205...................... Las Gallinas Creek/Santa Venetia Levee, CA............................................. ................. Senator Feinstein
Section 205...................... Little Mill Creek, Elsemere, DE........................................................ ................. Senator Salazar
Section 205...................... Little River Diversion, Dutchtown, MO.................................................. ................. The President, Senator Bond
Section 205...................... Livingston, MT......................................................................... ................. The President
Section 205...................... Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA............................................................... ................. The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley
Section 205...................... McKinney Bayou, Tunica County, MS...................................................... ................. Senators Cochran, Wicker
Section 205...................... Mill Brook, Highland Park, NJ.......................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 205...................... Montevideo, MN......................................................................... ................. Senator Coleman
Section 205...................... North River, Peabody, MA............................................................... ................. Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Section 205...................... Oak Creek, Florence, Colorado.......................................................... ................. Senators Allard, Salazar
Section 205...................... Pailet Basin, Barataria, LA............................................................ ................. Senator Vitter
Section 205...................... Palai Stream, Hawaii, HI............................................................... ................. Senators Inouye, Akaka
Section 205...................... Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX........................................................... ................. The President, Senator Hutchison
Section 205...................... Pennsville, NJ......................................................................... ................. Senator Lautenberg
Section 205...................... Pennsylvania Avenue Improvement Project, Bethany Beach, DE............................. ................. Senators Biden, Carper
Section 205...................... Philadelphia Shipyard Sea Wall, Philadelphia, PA....................................... ................. Senator Casey
Section 205...................... Platte River, Fremont, NE.............................................................. ................. The President, Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel
Section 205...................... Platte River, Schuyler, NE............................................................. ................. Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel
Section 205...................... Poplar Brook, Deal and Ocean Township, NJ.............................................. ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 205...................... Randolph, NE (Middle Logan Creek)...................................................... ................. Senator Hagel
Section 205...................... Red Oak Creek, Red Oak, IA............................................................. ................. Senator Grassley
Section 205...................... Rio Descalabrado, PR................................................................... ................. The President
Section 205...................... Rio Guamani-Guaya, PR.................................................................. ................. The President
Section 205...................... Salisbury, MA.......................................................................... ................. The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Section 205...................... Swannanoa River Watershed, NC.......................................................... ................. Senator Dole
Section 205...................... Town of Carencro, Lafayette Parish, LA................................................. ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Section 205...................... Turkey Creek, Ben Hill County, GA...................................................... ................. Senators Biden, Carper
Section 205...................... Upper Passaic River and Tributaries, Long Hill Township, NJ............................ ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 205...................... Wahpeton, ND........................................................................... ................. Senator Dorgan
Section 205...................... Wailele Strm, Oahu, HI................................................................. ................. The President
Section 205...................... White Slough, CA....................................................................... ................. The President
Section 205...................... Winnebago River, Mason City, IA........................................................ ................. Senator Grassley
Section 205...................... WV Statewide Flood Warning System, WV.................................................. ................. The President, Senator Byrd
Section 205...................... Wynne, AR.............................................................................. ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor
Section 206...................... AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206)................................................ 25,000,000 The President
Section 206...................... Arkansas River Habitat Restoration Project, CO......................................... ................. The President
Section 206...................... Arrowhead Creek, OR.................................................................... ................. Senators Wyden, Smith
Section 206...................... Asheville-Buncomb County, NC........................................................... ................. Senator Dole
Section 206...................... Beaver Creek, OR....................................................................... ................. Senators Wyden, Smith
Section 206...................... Blue Hole Lake State Park, NM.......................................................... ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Section 206...................... Blue River, CO......................................................................... ................. The President, Senator Salazar
Section 206...................... Bottomless Lakes State Park, NM........................................................ ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Section 206...................... Brownsville Branch, AR................................................................. ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor
Section 206...................... Buras Marina, LA....................................................................... ................. Senator Landrieu
Section 206...................... Camp Creek-Zumwalt Prairie, OR......................................................... ................. Senators Wyden, Smith
Section 206...................... Carpenter Creek, WA.................................................................... ................. The President
Section 206...................... Chariton River/Rathbun Lake, IA........................................................ ................. Senators Harkin, Grassley
Section 206...................... Chattahoochee Fall-Line Ecosystem Restoration, GA...................................... ................. Senators Shelby, Chambliss, Isakson
Section 206...................... Christine and Hickson Dams, ND......................................................... ................. The President, Senator Dorgan
Section 206...................... Codorus Creek Watershed Restoration, PA................................................ ................. Senator Casey
Section 206...................... Concord Streams Restoration, NC........................................................ ................. The President, Senator Dole
Section 206...................... Deep Run/Tiber Hudson, Howard County, MD............................................... ................. Senators Mikulski, Cardin
Section 206...................... Dents Run, Elk County, PA.............................................................. ................. The President, Senator Casey
Section 206...................... Dog Island Shoals, MD.................................................................. ................. Senator Cardin
Section 206...................... Drayton Dam, ND........................................................................ ................. The President, Senators Dorgan, Coleman
Section 206...................... Duck Creek, Davenport, IA.............................................................. ................. Senator Grassley
Section 206...................... Emiquon Preserve, Fulton County, IL.................................................... ................. Senator Durbin
Section 206...................... Eugene Delta Ponds, OR................................................................. ................. The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
Section 206...................... Eugene Field, IL....................................................................... ................. The President
Section 206...................... Gerritsen Creek, Brooklyn, NY.......................................................... ................. Senator Schumer
Section 206...................... Goose Creek, Boulder, CO............................................................... ................. The President, Senator Salazar
Section 206...................... Greenbury Point, MD.................................................................... ................. Senator Cardin
Section 206...................... Heron Haven, NE........................................................................ ................. Senator Hagel
Section 206...................... Hoffman Dam, IL........................................................................ ................. The President
Section 206...................... Incline and Third Creeks, NV........................................................... ................. Senator Ensign
Section 206...................... Jackson Creek, GA...................................................................... ................. The President
Section 206...................... Janes-Wallace Memorial Dam, Santa Rosa, NM............................................. ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Section 206...................... Kings Park, NY......................................................................... ................. Senator Schumer
Section 206...................... Lake Killarney, Louisiana State Penitentiary, LA....................................... ................. Senator Landrieu
Section 206...................... Lake Verret, Assumption Parish, LA..................................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Section 206...................... Lower Boulder Creek, CO................................................................ ................. Senator Salazar
Section 206...................... Lower Hempstead Harbor, NY............................................................. ................. Senator Schumer
Section 206...................... Mandeville Ecosystem Restoration, LA................................................... ................. Senator Vitter
Section 206...................... Manhasset Bay, NY...................................................................... ................. Senator Schumer
Section 206...................... Marion Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, MI............................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
Section 206...................... Milford Pond, Milford, MA.............................................................. ................. Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Section 206...................... Mokuhinia/Mokuula Restoration, HI...................................................... ................. Senators, Inouye, Akaka
Section 206...................... Mud Creek, Great South Bay, NY......................................................... ................. Senator Schumer
Section 206...................... Musconetcong River Dam Removals, NJ.................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 206...................... North Beach Wetland Restoration, MD.................................................... ................. Senators Mikulski, Cardin
Section 206...................... North Fork Gunnison River, CO.......................................................... ................. Senator Salazar
Section 206...................... Northport Harbor, Huntington, NY....................................................... ................. Senator Schumer
Section 206...................... Northwest Branch Anacostia River, MD................................................... ................. The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin
Section 206...................... Ogden River Restoration, UT............................................................ ................. Senator Bennett
Section 206...................... Olentangy 5th Avenue Dam, OH........................................................... ................. Senator Voinovich
Section 206...................... Orland Park, IL........................................................................ ................. The President
Section 206...................... Painter Creek, MN...................................................................... ................. Senators Coleman, Klobuchar
Section 206...................... Pennsville, Salem County, NJ........................................................... ................. Senator Menendez
Section 206...................... Pleasure Island, MD.................................................................... ................. Senator Cardin
Section 206...................... Rancocas Creek Fish Passage Restoration Project, NJ.................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 206...................... Rose Bay Ecosystem Restoration Project, FL............................................. ................. The President
Section 206...................... Soundview Park, Bronx, NY.............................................................. ................. Senator Schumer
Section 206...................... Spring Lake, San Marcos, TX............................................................ ................. Senator Hutchison
Section 206...................... Springfield Mill Race Stabilization and Protection, OR................................. ................. Senators Wyden, Smith
Section 206...................... Squaw Creek, (Round Lake Drain), IL.................................................... ................. Senator Durbin
Section 206...................... St. Helena-Napa River, CA.............................................................. ................. The President
Section 206...................... Stephenville WWTP, Meridian, TX........................................................ ................. The President
Section 206...................... Storm Lake, IA......................................................................... ................. The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley
Section 206...................... Sweetwater Reservoir Ecosystem Restoration, CA......................................... ................. Senator Feinstein
Section 206...................... Swift Creek Asbestos Sediment Management, WA........................................... ................. Senator Cantwell
Section 206...................... Tamarisk Eradication, CO............................................................... ................. Senator Salazar
Section 206...................... Tangier Island, Accomack County, VA.................................................... ................. Senators Warner, Webb
Section 206...................... University Lakes, Baton Rouge, LA...................................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Section 206...................... Upper York Creek, Dam Removal, CA...................................................... ................. Senator Feinstein
Section 206...................... Urieville Lake, MD..................................................................... ................. Senator Cardin
Section 206...................... Ventura Marsh Habitat Restoration, Clear Lake, IA...................................... ................. The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley
Section 206...................... Vermillion River Ecosystem Restoration, LA............................................. ................. Senator Vitter
Section 206...................... Western Branch, Patuxent River, MD..................................................... ................. Senators Mikulski, Cardin
Section 206...................... Whitebreast Creek Watershed, IA........................................................ ................. Senator Grassley
Section 206...................... Wilson Bay Restoration, NC............................................................. ................. The President
Section 206...................... Winneapaug Pond Restoration, RI........................................................ ................. Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Section 206...................... Wright's Creek, Dorchester Creek, MD................................................... ................. Senator Cardin
Section 206...................... Zemurray Park Lake Restoration, Tangipahoa Parish, LA.................................. ................. Senator Vitter
Section 1135..................... PROJECT MODS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (SECTION 1135)............................. 25,000,000 The President
Section 1135..................... Assunpink Creek, Trenton, NJ........................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 1135..................... Bayou Desiard, Monroe, LA.............................................................. ................. Senator Landrieu
Section 1135..................... Belhaven Harbor, NC.................................................................... ................. Senator Dole
Section 1135..................... Bloomington State Park, MO............................................................. ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Blue Valley Wetlands, Jackson, MO...................................................... ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Braided Reach, WA...................................................................... ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Duck Creek Conservation Area, Stoddard County, MO...................................... ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Eagleland Ecosystem, TX................................................................ ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Frazier/Whitehorse Oxbow Lake Weir, LA................................................. ................. Senator Landrieu
Section 1135..................... Gerritsen Creek, NY.................................................................... ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Green River Dam Modifications, KY...................................................... ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Indian Ridge Marsh, Chicago, IL........................................................ ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Kanaha Pond Wildlife Sanctuary Restoration, HI......................................... ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Kaunakakai Stream Environmental Restoration, HI........................................ ................. The President, Senators Inouye, Akaka
Section 1135..................... Lake Champlain Lamprey Barriers, VT.................................................... ................. Senator Leahy
Section 1135..................... Lake Fausse Pointe, Iberia Parish, LA.................................................. ................. Senator Vitter
Section 1135..................... Lake St. Joseph, Tensas Parish, LA..................................................... ................. Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Section 1135..................... Lake Whittington Weir, MS & AR......................................................... ................. Senators Cochran, Wicker
Section 1135..................... Las Cruces Dam Environmental Restoration, Dona Ana County, NM.......................... ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Section 1135..................... Lincoln Park West, Ecosystem Restoration Study, NJ..................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 1135..................... Lower Assunpink Creek, NJ.............................................................. ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 1135..................... Lower Cache Restoration, AR............................................................ ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor
Section 1135..................... Lower Columbia Slough, OR.............................................................. ................. The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
Section 1135..................... Lower Kingman Island, DC............................................................... ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Millwood Lake, Grassy Lake, AR......................................................... ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor
Section 1135..................... Mordecai Island Coastal Wetland Restoration, NJ........................................ ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 1135..................... Morganza Fore-Bay Restoration, LA...................................................... ................. Senator Vitter
Section 1135..................... Pine Mount Creek, NJ................................................................... ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 1135..................... Pond Creek Salt Marsh Restoration, Cape May County, NJ................................. ................. Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Section 1135..................... Prison Farm, ND........................................................................ ................. The President, Senator Dorgan
Section 1135..................... Pueblo of Santa Ana Aquatic Restoration, NM............................................ ................. Senator Bingaman
Section 1135..................... Rathbun Lake, South Fork Restoration, IA............................................... ................. Senators Harkin, Grassley
Section 1135..................... Rock Creek at Boyle Park, Little Rock, AR.............................................. ................. Senators Lincoln, Pryor
Section 1135..................... Route 66 Environmental Restoration, Albuquerque, NM.................................... ................. Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Section 1135..................... Sand Hill River, MN.................................................................... ................. The President
Section 1135..................... Shorty's Islands, WA................................................................... ................. The President, Senators Murray, Cantwell
Section 1135..................... Spring Creek, NY....................................................................... ................. Senator Schumer
Section 1135..................... Tappan Lake, OH........................................................................ ................. The President, Senator Inhofe
Section 1135..................... Tujunga Wash Environmental Restoration, CA............................................. ................. Senator Feinstein
Section 1135..................... Village of Oyster, Northampton County, VA.............................................. ................. Senators Warner, Webb
MR&T--GI......................... ALEXANDRIA TO THE GULF, LA................................................................. 790,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--GI......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM LAND STUDY, LA........................................... ................. The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--GI......................... BAYOU METO BASIN, AR....................................................................... 43,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
MR&T--GI......................... COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS............................................. 130,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--GI......................... COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA......................................................... 1,430,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Landrieu,
Wicker
MR&T--GI......................... MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MGMT STUDY, TN............................................. 34,000 The President
MR&T--GI......................... MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA................................................................... 6,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--GI......................... QUIVER RIVER, MS........................................................................... 250,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--GI......................... SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR..................................................................... 400,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
MR&T--GI......................... SPRING BAYOU, LA........................................................................... 300,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--CG......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA..................................................... 2,025,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--CG......................... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...................................................................... 15,500,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--CG......................... CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN........................................... 50,200,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Lincoln,
Pryor
MR&T--CG......................... CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, DIKES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN.................................... ................. The President
MR&T--CG......................... CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, REVETMENT OPERATIONS, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN..................... ................. The President
MR&T--CG......................... GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR................................................................... 9,000,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
MR&T--CG......................... MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............................................................... 3,933,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--CG......................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN...................................... 63,823,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Landrieu,
Wicker, Bond, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter
MR&T--CG......................... ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR & MO................................................. 5,700,000 Senators Bond, Lincoln, Pryor
MR&T--CG......................... ST. JOHNS BAYOU AND NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MO................................................ 200,000 Senator Bond
MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN, BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU.................................................... 50,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS....................................................... 2,275,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, MS.................................................. 18,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--MAIN STEM, MS................................................................. 25,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--REFORMULATION UNIT, MS........................................................ 2,800,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS...................................................... 14,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--CG......................... YAZOO BASIN--YAZOO BACKWATER, MS........................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA..................................................... 2,117,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--O&M........................ ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...................................................................... 8,619,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--O&M........................ BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA........................................................ 162,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--O&M........................ BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA......................................................... 42,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--O&M........................ BONNET CARRE, LA........................................................................... 2,346,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--O&M........................ CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN........................................... 70,000,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Landrieu,
Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS...................................................................... 436,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR......................................................... 128,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
MR&T--O&M........................ HICKMAN/MAGNOLIA BLUFF, KY................................................................. 60,000 Senator McConnell
MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.......................................................... 249,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.......................................................... 135,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.......................................................... 93,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.......................................................... 1,927,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.......................................................... 185,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.......................................................... 101,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.......................................................... 81,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR....................................................... 256,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR....................................................... 161,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA..................................................... 53,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ MAPPING.................................................................................... 1,488,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
MR&T--O&M........................ MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN.......................................................... 3,283,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............................................................... 578,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
MR&T--O&M........................ MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN...................................... 16,368,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Landrieu,
Wicker, Bond, Lincoln, Pryor, Vitter
MR&T--O&M........................ OLD RIVER, LA.............................................................................. 13,882,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--O&M........................ ST FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO.................................................................. 8,200,000 The President, Senators Bond, Lincoln, Pryor
MR&T--O&M........................ TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, AR & LA............................................. 1,880,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Lincoln,
Pryor, Vitter
MR&T--O&M........................ TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA...................................................... 2,501,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
MR&T--O&M........................ VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS....................................................................... 424,000 The President, Senator Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO........................................................................ 4,567,000 The President, Senator Bond
MR&T--O&M........................ WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR.................................................................. 1,000,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS............................................................ 6,673,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS....................................................... 1,500,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS................................................................. 7,417,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS................................................................. 1,650,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS.............................................................. 7,166,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS................................................................. 2,237,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS............................................................... 8,916,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS............................................................... 925,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS............................................... 285,000 The President
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS...................................................... 442,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
MR&T--O&M........................ YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS................................................................ 534,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
O&M.............................. ABIQUIU DAM, NM............................................................................ 2,220,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. ABSECON INLET, NJ.......................................................................... 265,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL.................................................................... 15,672,000 The President, Senators Shelby, Sessions
O&M.............................. ALABAMA--COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER STUDY, AL............................................... 375,000 The President
O&M.............................. ALAMO LAKE, AZ............................................................................. 1,585,000 The President
O&M.............................. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID....................................................................... 1,539,000 The President
O&M.............................. ALLATOONA LAKE, GA......................................................................... 6,016,000 The President
O&M.............................. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA........................................................................ 6,578,000 The President
O&M.............................. ALMOND LAKE, NY............................................................................ 424,000 The President
O&M.............................. ALPENA HARBOR, MI.......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH........................................................................ 1,439,000 The President
O&M.............................. ALVIN R BUSH DAM, PA....................................................................... 591,000 The President
O&M.............................. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK....................................................................... 17,601,000 The President
O&M.............................. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, GA, AL & FL.................................. 3,418,000 The President, Senator Shelby
O&M.............................. APPLEGATE LAKE, OR......................................................................... 904,000 The President
O&M.............................. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA....................................................................... 500,000 Senators Warner, Webb
O&M.............................. AQUILLA LAKE, TX........................................................................... 1,354,000 The President
O&M.............................. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. ARCADIA LAKE, OK........................................................................... 472,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR......................................................................... 100,000 The President
O&M.............................. ARKANSAS--RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL--AREA VI....................................... 1,415,000 The President
O&M.............................. ARKPORT DAM, NY............................................................................ 225,000 The President
O&M.............................. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH....................................................................... 1,850,000 The President, Senator Voinovich
O&M.............................. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF AND BLACK, LA.................................... 8,993,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA......................................................... 1,000,000 The President, Senators Chambliss, Isakson
O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC......................................................... 2,000,000 The President, Senator Dole
O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC......................................................... 1,500,000 The President, Senator Graham
O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC, VA.................................................... 1,823,000 The President
O&M.............................. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, VA.................................................... 967,000 The President
O&M.............................. AU SABLE, MI............................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA.................................................................. 215,000 The President
O&M.............................. B EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.......................................................... 1,633,000 The President
O&M.............................. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT..................................................................... 719,000 The President, Senator Leahy
O&M.............................. BALTIMORE HARBOR (DRIFT REMOVAL), MD....................................................... 338,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin
O&M.............................. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50 FOOT), MD................................................ 16,193,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin
O&M.............................. BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA................................................................. 926,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI................................................................... 548,000 The President, Senator Inouye
O&M.............................. BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX............................................................... 1,417,000 The President
O&M.............................. BARDWELL LAKE, TX.......................................................................... 2,162,000 The President
O&M.............................. BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY & TN...................................................... 10,255,000 The President
O&M.............................. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ......................................................................... 225,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA........................................................................ 580,000 The President
O&M.............................. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY...................................................................... 5,969,000 The President, Senator McConnell
O&M.............................. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI........................................................................ ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA................................................................. 809,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. BAYOU LACOMBE, LA.......................................................................... 450,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP WATERWAY, LA............................................ 724,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. BAYOU PIERRE, LA........................................................................... 18,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
O&M.............................. BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA................................................................ 321,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA........................................................ 14,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
O&M.............................. BAYOU TECHE, LA............................................................................ 209,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................... 3,122,000 The President
O&M.............................. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO........................................................................ 332,000 The President
O&M.............................. BEAVER LAKE, AR............................................................................ 5,270,000 The President
O&M.............................. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV........................................................................ 2,500,000 The President, Senator Byrd
O&M.............................. BELTON LAKE, TX............................................................................ 3,567,000 The President
O&M.............................. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA........................................................................ 1,311,000 The President
O&M.............................. BENBROOK LAKE, TX.......................................................................... 2,302,000 The President
O&M.............................. BERLIN LAKE, OH............................................................................ 4,867,000 The President
O&M.............................. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI......................................................................... ................. Senator Levin
O&M.............................. BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD.............................................................. 6,799,000 The President
O&M.............................. BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY....................................................................... 1,250,000 The President
O&M.............................. BIGSTONE LAKE WHETSTONE RIVER, MN & SD..................................................... 172,000 The President
O&M.............................. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA......................................................................... 574,000 The President
O&M.............................. BIRCH LAKE, OK............................................................................. 648,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA....................................................................... 1,954,000 The President
O&M.............................. BLACK RIVER (GOGEBIC), MI.................................................................. ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY................................................ 1,235,000 The President
O&M.............................. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT........................................................................ 416,000 The President
O&M.............................. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL..................................................... 22,191,000 The President, Senators Shelby, Sessions
O&M.............................. BLACKWATER DAM, NH......................................................................... 567,000 The President
O&M.............................. BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR.......................................................... 8,384,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
O&M.............................. BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR, RI (old Harbor)....................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Reed
O&M.............................. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA........................................................................ 2,736,000 The President
O&M.............................. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR..................................................................... 1,427,000 The President
O&M.............................. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR........................................................................ 427,000 The President
O&M.............................. BLUESTONE LAKE, WV......................................................................... 1,508,000 The President
O&M.............................. BOGUE INLET, NC............................................................................ 400,000 Senator Dole
O&M.............................. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA........................................................... 9,691,000 The President
O&M.............................. BOSTON HARBOR, MA.......................................................................... 6,000,000 The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry
O&M.............................. BOWMAN--HALEY LAKE, ND..................................................................... 153,000 The President
O&M.............................. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX................................................................... 3,259,000 The President, Senator Cornyn
O&M.............................. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR DREDGING, CT............................................................. 2,000,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
O&M.............................. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK........................................................................ 1,903,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. BRONX RIVER, NY............................................................................ 250,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN........................................................................ 1,649,000 The President
O&M.............................. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA....................................................................... 5,545,000 The President, Senators Chambliss, Isakson
O&M.............................. BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA.......................................................... 1,820,000 The President
O&M.............................. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY.......................................................................... 2,433,000 The President
O&M.............................. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX.......................................................... 1,723,000 The President
O&M.............................. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY......................................................................... 50,000 The President
O&M.............................. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA....................................................................... 515,000 The President
O&M.............................. BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA...................................................... 7,946,000 The President
O&M.............................. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR....................................................................... 7,367,000 The President
O&M.............................. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN.................................................................. 160,000 The President
O&M.............................. BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV........................................................................ 1,973,000 The President
O&M.............................. BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY..................................................................... 220,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. CADDO LAKE, LA............................................................................. 181,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH...................................................................... 2,149,000 The President
O&M.............................. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN....................................................................... 2,053,000 The President
O&M.............................. CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA............................................................... 14,968,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN.......................................................... 4,780,000 The President
O&M.............................. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL....................................................................... 4,404,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
O&M.............................. CANTON LAKE, OK............................................................................ 1,707,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. CANYON LAKE, TX............................................................................ 3,686,000 The President
O&M.............................. CAPE COD CANAL, MA......................................................................... 11,546,000 The President
O&M.............................. CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC....................................................... 718,000 The President, Senator Dole
O&M.............................. CARLYLE LAKE, IL........................................................................... 4,155,000 The President, Senator Durbin
O&M.............................. CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC................................................................... 600,000 Senator Dole
O&M.............................. CARR CREEK LAKE, KY........................................................................ 1,797,000 The President
O&M.............................. CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA................................................................... 7,703,000 The President
O&M.............................. CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO.................................................................. 500,000 The President, Senator Bond
O&M.............................. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY.......................................................................... 1,098,000 The President
O&M.............................. CECIL M HARDEN LAKE, IN.................................................................... 1,226,000 The President
O&M.............................. CENTER HILL LAKE, TN....................................................................... 7,021,000 The President
O&M.............................. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL........................................................... 13,234,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA................................................................. 5,360,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX................................................................ 348,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHANNELS IN LAKE ST CLAIR, MI.............................................................. 156,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREA, MA.............................................. 291,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC...................................................................... 9,947,000 The President, Senator Graham
O&M.............................. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI...................................................................... 197,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO......................................................................... 1,509,000 The President, Senators Allard, Salazar
O&M.............................. CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN.................................................................. 6,829,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK...................................................................... 2,225,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO...................................................................... 1,203,000 The President, Senators Allard, Salazar
O&M.............................. CHETCO RIVER, OR........................................................................... 574,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX, SD.......................................... 3,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
O&M.............................. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL......................................................................... 2,015,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHICAGO RIVER, IL.......................................................................... 475,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN...................................................... 1,200,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA....................................................................... 785,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE, VA.......................................................... 266,000 The President
O&M.............................. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA..................................................................... 207,000 The President
O&M.............................. CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS.................................................................. 60,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
O&M.............................. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE, MO................................................ 6,449,000 The President, Senator Bond
O&M.............................. CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH................................................................... 2,520,000 The President
O&M.............................. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO........................................................................ 2,825,000 The President, Senator Bond
O&M.............................. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH....................................................................... 6,710,000 The President, Senator Voinovich
O&M.............................. CLINTON LAKE, KS........................................................................... 2,042,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. CLINTON RIVER, MI.......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. COCHITI LAKE, NM........................................................................... 2,392,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. COLD BROOK LAKE, SD........................................................................ 303,000 The President
O&M.............................. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ...................................................................... 243,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT................................................................... 547,000 The President
O&M.............................. COLUMBIA & LWR WILLAMETTE R BLW VANCOUVER, WA & PORTLAND................................... 18,052,000 The President, Senators Murray, Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR....................................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Murray, Cantwell
O&M.............................. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA....................................................... 15,125,000 The President, Senators Murray, Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND SAND ISLAND, WA......................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Murray, Cantwell
O&M.............................. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA AND THE DALLES, OR.................................... 640,000 The President
O&M.............................. CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA...................................................................... 232,000 The President
O&M.............................. CONCHAS LAKE, NM........................................................................... 1,121,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA................................................................... 1,734,000 The President
O&M.............................. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH........................................................................ 350,000 The President
O&M.............................. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC........................................................ 4,685,000 The President, Senator Graham
O&M.............................. COOS BAY, OR............................................................................... 4,769,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. COPAN LAKE, OK............................................................................. 937,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. COQUILLE RIVER, OR......................................................................... 307,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA........................................................................ 2,887,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley
O&M.............................. CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN......................................................... 6,386,000 The President
O&M.............................. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX............................................................ 3,398,000 The President
O&M.............................. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR..................................................................... 991,000 The President
O&M.............................. COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD................................................................ 223,000 The President
O&M.............................. COUGAR LAKE, OR............................................................................ 5,380,000 The President
O&M.............................. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS..................................................................... 1,328,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA........................................................................ 1,847,000 The President
O&M.............................. COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA...................................................... 3,384,000 The President
O&M.............................. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA..................................................................... 2,530,000 The President
O&M.............................. CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV............................................................ 98,000 The President
O&M.............................. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA...................................................................... 625,000 The President
O&M.............................. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN....................................................................... 6,262,000 The President
O&M.............................. DANA POINT HARBOR, CA...................................................................... 700,000 Senator Boxer
O&M.............................. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM, AR................................................................ 8,491,000 The President
O&M.............................. DEER CREEK LAKE, OH........................................................................ 1,359,000 The President
O&M.............................. DEGRAY LAKE, AR............................................................................ 6,317,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
O&M.............................. DELAWARE LAKE, OH.......................................................................... 1,445,000 The President
O&M.............................. DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ............................................................... 15,000 The President
O&M.............................. DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA, NJ, PA & DE....................................... 18,778,000 The President, Senators Specter, Lautenberg,
Menendez, Casey
O&M.............................. DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO TRENTON, NJ............................................ 750,000 The President, Senators Specter, Lautenberg,
Menendez
O&M.............................. DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX............................................................... 6,393,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. DEPOE BAY, OR.............................................................................. 124,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR........................................................................... 1,286,000 The President
O&M.............................. DETROIT LAKE, OR........................................................................... 2,564,000 The President
O&M.............................. DETROIT RIVER, MI.......................................................................... 5,327,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. DEWEY LAKE, KY............................................................................. 1,768,000 The President
O&M.............................. DIERKS LAKE, AR............................................................................ 1,354,000 The President
O&M.............................. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK...................................................................... 840,000 The President
O&M.............................. DILLON LAKE, OH............................................................................ 1,454,000 The President
O&M.............................. DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME............................................................... 1,200,000 The President
O&M.............................. DORENA LAKE, OR............................................................................ 831,000 The President
O&M.............................. DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE AND CHANNEL, CA.............................................. 5,067,000 The President
O&M.............................. DULUTH--SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI........................................................... 4,929,000 The President
O&M.............................. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID............................................................. 2,404,000 The President
O&M.............................. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA......................................................... 2,179,000 The President
O&M.............................. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA.................................................................... 398,000 The President
O&M.............................. EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS............................................................. 135,000 The President
O&M.............................. EAST LYNN LAKE, WV......................................................................... 2,044,000 The President
O&M.............................. EAST RIVER, NY............................................................................. 500,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY.................................................................... 4,220,000 The President
O&M.............................. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY....................................................................... 473,000 The President
O&M.............................. EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY...................................................................... 180,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI................................................................... 611,000 The President
O&M.............................. EDIZ HOOK, WA.............................................................................. 63,000 The President
O&M.............................. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH.................................................................. 514,000 The President
O&M.............................. EL DORADO LAKE, KS......................................................................... 569,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. ELK CITY LAKE, KS.......................................................................... 734,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. ELKINS, WV................................................................................. 14,000 The President
O&M.............................. ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY........................................................... 25,000 The President
O&M.............................. ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL............................................................ 25,000 The President
O&M.............................. ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT, TX................................................. 38,000 The President
O&M.............................. EUFAULA LAKE, OK........................................................................... 5,348,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA..................................................... 1,293,000 The President, Senator Murray
O&M.............................. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA, SBC RESERVATION PLAN, FL..................................... 400,000 The President
O&M.............................. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH........................................................................ 2,026,000 The President
O&M.............................. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR........................................................................ 1,418,000 The President
O&M.............................. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS........................................................................ 1,284,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. FALLS LAKE, NC............................................................................. 1,683,000 The President
O&M.............................. FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL.................................................................. 203,000 The President
O&M.............................. FARMINGTON DAM, CA......................................................................... 443,000 The President
O&M.............................. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR........................................................................ 1,433,000 The President
O&M.............................. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL...................................................................... 2,025,000 The President
O&M.............................. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE PINES, TX................................................. 4,179,000 The President
O&M.............................. FISHTRAP LAKE, KY.......................................................................... 1,830,000 The President
O&M.............................. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY................................................................. 380,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK....................................................................... 10,218,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD.................................................... 7,328,000 The President
O&M.............................. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK....................................................................... 742,000 The President
O&M.............................. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA............................................................... 633,000 The President
O&M.............................. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, RI............................................................ 500,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
O&M.............................. FOX RIVER, WI.............................................................................. 3,775,000 The President, Senator Kohl
O&M.............................. FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA................................................................... 774,000 The President, Senator Casey
O&M.............................. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH..................................................................... 619,000 The President
O&M.............................. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX........................................................................ 7,020,000 The President
O&M.............................. FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA....................................................................... 1,848,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. FT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT................................................................... 4,444,000 The President
O&M.............................. GALISTEO DAM, NM........................................................................... 423,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX........................................................... 6,022,000 The President
O&M.............................. GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND........................................................... 11,789,000 The President, Senator Dorgan
O&M.............................. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA.......................................................... 2,022,000 The President
O&M.............................. GAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD............................................ 6,518,000 The President, Hagel
O&M.............................. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA................................................. 228,000 The President
O&M.............................. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC...................................................................... 690,000 The President, Senator Graham
O&M.............................. GILLHAM LAKE, AR........................................................................... 1,156,000 The President
O&M.............................. GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX.............................................................. 2,706,000 The President
O&M.............................. GIWW, CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX.................................................................. 2,926,000 The President
O&M.............................. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI..................................................................... 1,312,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI.................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI.............................................................. ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX................................................................... 2,225,000 The President
O&M.............................. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX......................................................................... 2,900,000 The President
O&M.............................. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA........................................................ 9,180,000 The President
O&M.............................. GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MI..................................................................... 180,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. GRAYSON LAKE, KY........................................................................... 1,445,000 The President
O&M.............................. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK................................................................. 256,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (new Harbor)............................................. 250,000 Senator Reed
O&M.............................. GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY........................................................................ 80,000 The President
O&M.............................. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY................................................................ 3,698,000 The President, Senator McConnell
O&M.............................. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI....................................................................... 5,394,000 The President, Senator Kohl
O&M.............................. GREEN PETER--FOSTER LAKES, OR.............................................................. 2,323,000 The President
O&M.............................. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY....................................................................... 4,942,000 The President
O&M.............................. GREENS BAYOU, TX........................................................................... 850,000 The President
O&M.............................. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR...................................................................... 6,861,000 The President
O&M.............................. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL............................................................. 5,230,000 The President, Senators Shelby, Sessions
O&M.............................. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA............................................................. 17,769,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter,
Wicker
O&M.............................. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX............................................................. 31,874,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
O&M.............................. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS........................................................................ 10,000,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
O&M.............................. HALEIWA HARBOR, OAHU, HI................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Inouye
O&M.............................. HAMPTON RDS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS HBR, VA (DRIFT REMOVAL)................................ 1,108,000 The President
O&M.............................. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT..................................................................... 338,000 The President
O&M.............................. HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE................................................................ 500,000 Senators Biden, Carper
O&M.............................. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE..................................................................... 1,786,000 The President, Senators Ben Nelson, Hagel
O&M.............................. HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO....................................................... 8,863,000 The President, Senator Bond
O&M.............................. HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC..................................................................... 12,188,000 The President
O&M.............................. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR......................................................... 400,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
O&M.............................. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD, MD............................................................... 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
O&M.............................. HEYBURN LAKE, OK........................................................................... 555,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA............................................................... 1,786,000 The President
O&M.............................. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR....................................................................... 1,292,000 The President
O&M.............................. HILLSDALE LAKE, KS......................................................................... 764,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA..................................................................... 503,000 The President
O&M.............................. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI......................................................................... 588,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. HOMER HARBOR, AK........................................................................... 620,000 The President
O&M.............................. HOMME LAKE, ND............................................................................. 293,000 The President, Senator Dorgan
O&M.............................. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD................................................................ 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
O&M.............................. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT......................................................................... 919,000 The President
O&M.............................. HOPKINTON--EVERETT LAKES, NH............................................................... 1,081,000 The President
O&M.............................. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX....................................................................... 1,479,000 The President
O&M.............................. HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA................................................................. 1,000,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................... 14,854,000 The President, Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
O&M.............................. HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA...................................................................... 2,627,000 The President
O&M.............................. HUDSON RIVER (MAINT), NY................................................................... 1,125,000 The President
O&M.............................. HUDSON RIVER (O&C), NY..................................................................... 1,525,000 The President
O&M.............................. HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY................................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. HUGO LAKE, OK.............................................................................. 1,493,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. HULAH LAKE, OK............................................................................. 476,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA................................................................ 5,144,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
O&M.............................. HURON HARBOR, OH........................................................................... 1,530,000 The President
O&M.............................. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, WA................................................................ 4,982,000 The President
O&M.............................. ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVR PORTION), IL & IN................................................... 36,287,000 The President
O&M.............................. ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVS PORTION), IL & IN................................................... 1,834,000 The President
O&M.............................. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, SUSSEX COUNTY, DE.............................................. 500,000 Senators Biden, Carper
O&M.............................. INDIANA HARBOR, IN......................................................................... 3,138,000 The President
O&M.............................. INLAND ROUTE, MI........................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, GA......................................... 63,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, IL......................................... 65,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, OR......................................... 33,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, WA......................................... 70,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK.......................................................... 1,058,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AL.......................................................... 60,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.......................................................... 508,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ.......................................................... 98,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA.......................................................... 3,822,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO.......................................................... 457,000 The President, Senator Salazar
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT.......................................................... 316,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC25........................................................ 62,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL.......................................................... 300,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA.......................................................... 142,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI.......................................................... 659,000 The President, Senator Inouye
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA.......................................................... 1,183,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID.......................................................... 334,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.......................................................... 2,342,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN.......................................................... 635,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS.......................................................... 177,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.......................................................... 554,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.......................................................... 1,814,000 The President, Senator Vitter
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA.......................................................... 381,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD.......................................................... 89,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME.......................................................... 29,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI.......................................................... 230,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN.......................................................... 623,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.......................................................... 1,688,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.......................................................... 223,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT.......................................................... 54,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC.......................................................... 250,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND.......................................................... 360,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE.......................................................... 508,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH.......................................................... 37,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ.......................................................... 253,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM.......................................................... 811,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV.......................................................... 127,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY.......................................................... 1,031,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH.......................................................... 452,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK.......................................................... 177,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR.......................................................... 413,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA.......................................................... 592,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI.......................................................... 43,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC.......................................................... 65,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD.......................................................... 49,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.......................................................... 85,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX.......................................................... 1,936,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT.......................................................... 75,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA.......................................................... 226,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT.......................................................... 70,000 The President, Senator Leahy
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA.......................................................... 623,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI.......................................................... 125,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV.......................................................... 255,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY.......................................................... 34,000 The President
O&M.............................. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE R TO ANCLOTE R, FL................................... 1,000,000 Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
O&M.............................. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE R TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE.................................... 14,065,000 Mikulski, Biden, Carper, Cardin
O&M.............................. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL........................................... 2,500,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
O&M.............................. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE.................................... 40,000 The President
O&M.............................. ISABELLA LAKE, CA.......................................................................... 1,404,000 The President
O&M.............................. J BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA............................................................ 10,555,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. J EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN.................................................................... 2,842,000 The President
O&M.............................. J PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN....................................................... 4,602,000 The President
O&M.............................. J STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC............................................................. 11,066,000 The President
O&M.............................. JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY.................................................................... 326,000 The President
O&M.............................. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL.................................................................... 6,000,000 The President, Senator Martinez
O&M.............................. JAMAICA BAY, NY............................................................................ 250,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA.................................................................... 3,667,000 The President
O&M.............................. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM....................................................................... 684,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV............................................................ 1,713,000 The President, Senator Mikulski
O&M.............................. JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX....................................................................... 2,001,000 The President
O&M.............................. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA...................................... 9,165,000 The President
O&M.............................. JOE POOL LAKE, TX.......................................................................... 1,771,000 The President
O&M.............................. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA............................................................. 7,049,000 The President, Senator Murray
O&M.............................. JOHN H KERR LAKE, VA & NC.................................................................. 11,571,000 The President
O&M.............................. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO.................................................................. 2,418,000 The President, Senator Salazar
O&M.............................. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS......................................................... 1,042,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. JOHN W FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA..................................................... 1,938,000 The President
O&M.............................. JOHNSTOWN, PA.............................................................................. 2,255,000 The President
O&M.............................. JONES INLET, NY............................................................................ 350,000 The President
O&M.............................. KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV........................................................... 9,380,000 The President
O&M.............................. KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS......................................................................... 1,418,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL............................................................. 1,903,000 The President
O&M.............................. KAW LAKE, OK............................................................................... 2,574,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY......................................................................... 10,000 The President
O&M.............................. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI...................................................................... 86,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK.......................................................................... 6,073,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA..................................................... 2,493,000 The President
O&M.............................. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA........................................................................ 526,000 The President
O&M.............................. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI.................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN................................................... 431,000 The President
O&M.............................. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND........................................................ 1,742,000 The President, Senator Dorgan
O&M.............................. LAKE KEMP, TX.............................................................................. 214,000 The President
O&M.............................. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL................................................................ 860,000 The President
O&M.............................. LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY.................................................................... 700,000 The President
O&M.............................. LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA................................................................. 440,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL....................................................................... 4,761,000 The President, Senator Durbin
O&M.............................. LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN..................................................................... 403,000 The President
O&M.............................. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA............................................................. 7,554,000 The President, Senator Murray
O&M.............................. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY...................................................................... 1,748,000 The President
O&M.............................. LAVON LAKE, TX............................................................................. 3,065,000 The President
O&M.............................. LELAND HARBOR, MI.......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. LES CHENEAUX ISLAND CHANNELS, MI........................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX......................................................................... 4,110,000 The President
O&M.............................. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. LIBBY DAM, LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT.............................................................. 1,712,000 The President
O&M.............................. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO................................................................ 935,000 The President
O&M.............................. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, WA.............................................................. 2,360,000 The President, Senator Murray
O&M.............................. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI..................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY................................................................ 10,000 The President
O&M.............................. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA....................................................................... 489,000 The President
O&M.............................. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC.................................................................. 200,000 Senator Dole
O&M.............................. LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO....................................................................... 1,100,000 The President
O&M.............................. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY...................................................... 200,000 The President
O&M.............................. LONG ISLAND SOUND DMMP, CT................................................................. 1,000,000 The President
O&M.............................. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR..................................................................... 2,761,000 The President
O&M.............................. LORAIN HARBOR, OH.......................................................................... 2,423,000 The President
O&M.............................. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA....................................................... 3,996,000 The President
O&M.............................. LOST CREEK LAKE, OR........................................................................ 3,560,000 The President
O&M.............................. LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL, AK.................................................................... 500,000 Senator Stevens
O&M.............................. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA............................................................. 6,874,000 The President
O&M.............................. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA.......................................................... 4,664,000 The President, Senator Murray
O&M.............................. LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA........................................................................ 2,880,000 The President
O&M.............................. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID........................................................................ 1,801,000 The President
O&M.............................. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI....................................................................... 442,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA........................................................................ 1,058,000 The President
O&M.............................. MADISON PARISH PORT, LA.................................................................... 85,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA.................................................................... 1,823,000 The President
O&M.............................. MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ........................................................................ 160,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. MANATEE HARBOR, FL......................................................................... 2,675,000 The President, Senator Martinez
O&M.............................. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI........................................................................ ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI...................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT.................................................................. 493,000 The President
O&M.............................. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC................................................................ 4,100,000 The President, Senator Dole
O&M.............................. MARINA DEL REY, CA......................................................................... 2,499,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
O&M.............................. MARION LAKE, KS............................................................................ 1,504,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY...................................................................... 1,062,000 The President
O&M.............................. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV & CA................................................................. 737,000 The President
O&M.............................. MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS, NC................................................ 365,000 The President, Senator Dole
O&M.............................. MASSILLON, OH.............................................................................. 24,000 The President
O&M.............................. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................. 6,173,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
O&M.............................. MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY....................................................................... 20,000 The President
O&M.............................. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR........................................ 28,395,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
O&M.............................. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK........................................ 5,819,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA............................................................... 5,183,000 The President
O&M.............................. MELVERN LAKE, KS........................................................................... 2,111,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA.................................................................. 239,000 The President
O&M.............................. MERMENTAU RIVER, LA........................................................................ 1,969,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. MIAMI RIVER, FL............................................................................ 10,820,000 The President, Senators Bill Nelson, Martinez
O&M.............................. MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH..................................................... 2,023,000 The President
O&M.............................. MICHIGAN HARBOR DREDGING, MI............................................................... 5,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM (MRGESCP)................... 200,000 Senators Domenici Bingaman
O&M.............................. MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY..................................................... 102,000 The President
O&M.............................. MILFORD LAKE, KS........................................................................... 2,133,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA........................................................................ 2,437,000 The President
O&M.............................. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR.......................................................................... 2,074,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
O&M.............................. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI....................................................................... 650,000 The President
O&M.............................. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN........................................................................ 200,000 The President
O&M.............................. MISPILLION RIVER, DE....................................................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Biden, Carper
O&M.............................. MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVP PORTION), MN................................. 44,904,000 The President
O&M.............................. MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION), IL................................. 63,207,000 The President, Senators Durbin, Harkin, Bond,
Grassley
O&M.............................. MISS RIVER BTWN MO RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION), IL................................. 20,004,000 The President, Senators Bond, Grassley
O&M.............................. MISS RIVER BTWN THE OHIO AND MO RIVERS (LOWER RIVER), MO................................... 25,359,000 The President, Senator Bond
O&M.............................. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN...................................................................... 1,051,000 The President
O&M.............................. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA.................................................... 3,136,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LA................................... 55,325,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA........................................ 166,000 The President
O&M.............................. MISSOURI RIVER--RULO TO MOUTH, IA, NE, KS & MO............................................. 5,106,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Bond,
Grassley, Hagel
O&M.............................. MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO RULO, IA & NE................................................ 2,560,000 The President, Senators Grassley, Hagel
O&M.............................. MOBILE HARBOR, AL.......................................................................... 21,562,000 The President, Senator Shelby
O&M.............................. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA....................................................................... 285,000 The President
O&M.............................. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA...................................................................... 12,392,000 The President, Senator Casey
O&M.............................. MONROE HARBOR, MI.......................................................................... 1,018,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. MONROE LAKE, IN............................................................................ 1,326,000 The President
O&M.............................. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC................................................................... 5,000,000 The President, Senators Dole, Burr
O&M.............................. MORICHES INLET, NY......................................................................... 2,050,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA....................................................................... 1,630,000 The President
O&M.............................. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH.................................................................... 1,383,000 The President
O&M.............................. MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY....................................................................... 4,839,000 The President
O&M.............................. MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS................................................................... 160,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
O&M.............................. MT ST HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.......................................................... 257,000 The President
O&M.............................. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA....................................................................... 3,271,000 The President, Senator Murray
O&M.............................. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE....................................................................... 30,000 The President
O&M.............................. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI........................................................................ 350,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH.................................................................. 8,275,000 The President
O&M.............................. NARRAGUAGUS RIVER, ME...................................................................... 600,000 Senators Snowe, Collins
O&M.............................. NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR.............................................................. 4,591,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
O&M.............................. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY......................................................... 80,000 The President, Senator Leahy
O&M.............................. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX..................................................................... 3,542,000 The President
O&M.............................. NEAH BAY, WA............................................................................... 308,000 The President
O&M.............................. NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA....................................................... 250,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
O&M.............................. NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET HURRICANE BARRIER, MA................................... 372,000 The President, Senators Kennedy, Kerry
O&M.............................. NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA......................................................................... 2,115,000 The President
O&M.............................. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ....................................................... 250,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. NEW MADRID HARBOR (MILE 889), MO........................................................... 300,000 Senator Bond
O&M.............................. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO...................................................................... 400,000 The President, Senator Bond
O&M.............................. NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, CA................................................... 1,730,000 The President
O&M.............................. NEW RIVER INLET, NC........................................................................ 800,000 The President, Senator Dole
O&M.............................. NEW TOPSAIL INLET, NC...................................................................... 400,000 Senator Dole
O&M.............................. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY....................................................... 6,750,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
O&M.............................. NEW YORK HARBOR (DRIFT REMOVAL), NY & NJ................................................... 6,300,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
O&M.............................. NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSIT), NY.................................... 950,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
O&M.............................. NEW YORK HARBOR, NY........................................................................ 4,000,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
O&M.............................. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ.............................................. 300,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
O&M.............................. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA..................................................................... 400,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
O&M.............................. NEWTOWN CREEK, NY.......................................................................... 220,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. NIMROD LAKE, AR............................................................................ 1,609,000 The President
O&M.............................. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK....................................................................... 350,000 The President
O&M.............................. NOLIN LAKE, KY............................................................................. 3,337,000 The President
O&M.............................. NOME HARBOR, AK............................................................................ 780,000 The President, Senator Stevens
O&M.............................. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA......................................................................... 10,072,000 The President, Senators Warner, Webb
O&M.............................. NORFORK LAKE, AR........................................................................... 3,920,000 The President
O&M.............................. NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH....................................................... 593,000 The President
O&M.............................. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA......................................................... 656,000 The President
O&M.............................. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT.................................................................... 635,000 The President, Senator Leahy
O&M.............................. NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE GEORGETOWN, TX.............................................. 2,066,000 The President
O&M.............................. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT................................................................. 747,000 The President, Senator Leahy
O&M.............................. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT.................................................................. 385,000 The President
O&M.............................. NOYO HARBOR, CA............................................................................ 750,000 Senator Feinstein
O&M.............................. O C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX................................................................ 907,000 The President
O&M.............................. OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND............................................................... 9,277,000 The President, Senator Dorgan
O&M.............................. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA......................................................................... 7,445,000 The President
O&M.............................. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD......................................... 450,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin
O&M.............................. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA....................................................................... 1,620,000 The President
O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN & OH................................................. 39,419,000 The President
O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV..................................................... 24,796,000 The President
O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH..................................................... 30,292,000 The President
O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, IN & OH.............................................. 4,485,000 The President
O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & WV.................................................. 509,000 The President
O&M.............................. OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & OH.................................................. 2,700,000 The President
O&M.............................. OHIO-MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH......................................................... 1,089,000 The President
O&M.............................. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS......................................................................... 1,900,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
O&M.............................. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL.................................................................... 4,530,000 The President
O&M.............................. OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN............................................................... 9,845,000 The President
O&M.............................. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI....................................................................... 655,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK........................................................................... 1,923,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. OPTIMA LAKE, OK............................................................................ 164,000 The President
O&M.............................. ORWELL LAKE, MN............................................................................ 256,000 The President
O&M.............................. OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR......................................................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
O&M.............................. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH....................................................................... 598,000 The President
O&M.............................. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA......................................................... 8,509,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Lincoln,
Pryor, Vitter
O&M.............................. OZARK--JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM, AR........................................................ 5,287,000 The President
O&M.............................. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH....................................................................... 1,307,000 The President
O&M.............................. PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ....................................................................... 1,206,000 The President
O&M.............................. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY....................................................................... 954,000 The President
O&M.............................. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL...................................................................... 2,385,000 The President, Senator Martinez
O&M.............................. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL..................................................................... 55,000 The President
O&M.............................. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE.................................................. 531,000 The President, Hagel
O&M.............................. PARISH CREEK, MD........................................................................... 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
O&M.............................. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS...................................................................... 7,511,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
O&M.............................. PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEMS, NJ.................................................... 254,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX......................................................................... 1,005,000 The President
O&M.............................. PATOKA LAKE, IN............................................................................ 1,150,000 The President
O&M.............................. PEARL RIVER, MS & LA....................................................................... 193,000 The President, Senator Wicker
O&M.............................. PEARSON--SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS......................................................... 1,048,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL....................................................................... 67,000 The President
O&M.............................. PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE CHEROKEES, OK............................................. 119,000 The President
O&M.............................. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. PERRY LAKE, KS............................................................................. 2,516,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. PETERSBERG NORTH HARBOR PROJECT, AK........................................................ 500,000 Senator Stevens
O&M.............................. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI........................................................................ ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA.......................................................................... 6,961,000 The President
O&M.............................. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV......................................................... 204,000 The President
O&M.............................. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK........................................................................ 1,099,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. PINE FLAT LAKE, CA......................................................................... 2,854,000 The President
O&M.............................. PINOLE SHOAL MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA.......................................................... 500,000 Senator Feinstein
O&M.............................. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND.......................................................................... 572,000 The President
O&M.............................. POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REUGE, RI........................................................... 1,250,000 The President, Senator Reed
O&M.............................. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO.................................................................... 2,108,000 The President
O&M.............................. POMONA LAKE, KS............................................................................ 1,969,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI..................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. PORT HUENEME, CA........................................................................... 4,029,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
O&M.............................. PORT ORFORD, OR............................................................................ 7,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI.................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. PORTAGE HARBOR, MI......................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. PORTCHESTER HARBOR, NY..................................................................... 150,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME........................................................................ 100,000 The President, Senators Snowe, Collins
O&M.............................. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS (DRIFT REMOVAL), DC........................................... 805,000 The President
O&M.............................. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI.................................................................... 312,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. PROCTOR LAKE, TX........................................................................... 2,155,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK.............................................................. 550,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL.............................................................. 100,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR.............................................................. 8,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA.............................................................. 2,422,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT.............................................................. 1,100,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC.............................................................. 28,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE.............................................................. 147,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL.............................................................. 1,265,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA.............................................................. 162,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI.............................................................. 537,000 The President, Senator Inouye
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL.............................................................. 111,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN.............................................................. 185,000 The President
O&M.............................. Project Condition Surveys, KY.............................................................. 7,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA.............................................................. 1,200,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD.............................................................. 376,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME.............................................................. 750,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI.............................................................. 276,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN.............................................................. 95,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO.............................................................. 14,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS.............................................................. 82,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC.............................................................. 675,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH.............................................................. 300,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ.............................................................. 1,363,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY.............................................................. 1,830,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH.............................................................. 295,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR.............................................................. 220,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA.............................................................. 70,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI.............................................................. 400,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC.............................................................. 624,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN.............................................................. 9,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX.............................................................. 304,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA.............................................................. 870,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA.............................................................. 338,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI.............................................................. 160,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROMPTON LAKE, PA.......................................................................... 505,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI..................................................... 300,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
O&M.............................. PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA....................................................... 997,000 The President
O&M.............................. PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA........................................................................... 20,000 The President
O&M.............................. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA....................................................................... 1,572,000 The President
O&M.............................. R D BAILEY LAKE, WV........................................................................ 2,836,000 The President
O&M.............................. RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, NJ................................................... 200,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
O&M.............................. RARITAN RIVER, NJ.......................................................................... 220,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez,
Schumer
O&M.............................. RATHBUN LAKE, IA........................................................................... 2,277,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley
O&M.............................. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX....................................................................... 1,456,000 The President
O&M.............................. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA.......................................................................... 3,312,000 The President, Senator Specter
O&M.............................. RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN..................................................................... 84,000 The President
O&M.............................. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA......................................................... 3,278,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley
O&M.............................. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL.............................................................. 4,420,000 The President
O&M.............................. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA.............................................................. 1,500,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
O&M.............................. REND LAKE, IL.............................................................................. 4,570,000 The President, Senator Durbin
O&M.............................. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN.......................................... 3,170,000 The President
O&M.............................. RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD............................................................... 500,000 Senators Mikulski, Cardin
O&M.............................. RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC.................................................... 8,386,000 The President
O&M.............................. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA........................................................................ 6,950,000 The President
O&M.............................. RIO GRANDE BOSQUE REHABILITATION, NM....................................................... 4,000,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. ROBERT S KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIRS, OK.............................................. 6,599,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY....................................................................... 1,605,000 The President
O&M.............................. ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR.............................................................. 587,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC...................................................................... 300,000 The President, Senator Dole
O&M.............................. ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS........................................................................ 500,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
O&M.............................. ROSEVILLE, OH.............................................................................. 35,000 The President
O&M.............................. ROUGE RIVER, MI............................................................................ 1,161,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY....................................................................... 2,832,000 The President
O&M.............................. ROUSH RIVER MAJOR REHAB REPORT, IN......................................................... 300,000 The President
O&M.............................. RUDEE INLET, VA............................................................................ 370,000 The President, Senators Warner, Webb
O&M.............................. SABINE--NECHES WATERWAY, TX................................................................ 8,822,000 The President
O&M.............................. SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT PROJECT), CA..................................................... 5,582,000 The President
O&M.............................. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS CONTROL), CA...................................... 1,566,000 The President
O&M.............................. SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT CHANNEL, CA................................................. 175,000 The President
O&M.............................. SAGINAW RIVER, MI.......................................................................... 3,798,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN......................................................................... 1,226,000 The President
O&M.............................. SALEM RIVER, NJ............................................................................ 70,000 The President, Senator Lautenberg
O&M.............................. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE............................................................. 702,000 The President, Hagel
O&M.............................. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX.......................................................... 5,820,000 The President
O&M.............................. SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, CA........................................ 1,106,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
O&M.............................. SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY (DRIFT REMOVAL), CA........................................... 2,805,000 The President
O&M.............................. SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA................................................................... 2,514,000 The President
O&M.............................. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, CA.................................................... 5,411,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
O&M.............................. SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA................................................... 1,140,000 The President
O&M.............................. SANDY HOOK BAY AT LEONARDO, NJ............................................................. 40,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA.................................................................. 3,148,000 The President
O&M.............................. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA................................................................... 2,090,000 The President
O&M.............................. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM................................................................ 940,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. SARDIS LAKE, OK............................................................................ 912,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. SAUGATUCK HARBOR, MI....................................................................... ................. Senator Stabenow
O&M.............................. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA........................................................................ 13,895,000 The President
O&M.............................. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA........................................................... 183,000 The President
O&M.............................. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA....................................................................... 3,908,000 The President, Senators Harkin, Grassley
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AL........................................................ 94,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ........................................................ 39,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA........................................................ 1,639,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO........................................................ 720,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL........................................................ 30,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID........................................................ 469,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS........................................................ 30,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD........................................................ 64,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO........................................................ 327,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT........................................................ 88,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND........................................................ 119,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM........................................................ 502,000 The President, Senators Domenici Bingaman
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK........................................................ 520,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR........................................................ 82,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA........................................................ 46,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD........................................................ 52,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX........................................................ 101,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT........................................................ 598,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA........................................................ 506,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY........................................................ 87,000 The President
O&M.............................. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA....................................................................... 3,000,000 The President, Senators Specter, Casey
O&M.............................. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA......................................................................... 913,000 The President
O&M.............................. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI........................................................................ 75,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. SHARK RIVER, NJ............................................................................ 775,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA.................................................................... 2,366,000 The President
O&M.............................. SHINNECOCK INLET, NY....................................................................... 200,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ......................................................... 300,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. SHREWSBURY RIVER, MAIN CHANNEL, NJ......................................................... 120,000 The President, Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC..................................................................... 400,000 The President
O&M.............................. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR.......................................................................... 583,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK.......................................................................... 1,318,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR....................................................................... 5,000 The President
O&M.............................. SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO........................................................................ 1,203,000 The President
O&M.............................. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX........................................................................ 3,157,000 The President
O&M.............................. SOURIS RIVER, ND........................................................................... 280,000 The President
O&M.............................. SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL......................................... 357,000 The President
O&M.............................. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO................................................................ 8,000 The President
O&M.............................. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY............................................... 839,000 The President
O&M.............................. ST CLAIR RIVER, MI......................................................................... 1,791,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. ST JOSEPH HARBOR, MI....................................................................... 595,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. ST MARYS RIVER, MI......................................................................... 18,836,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT............................................................. 374,000 The President
O&M.............................. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA.................................................................... 248,000 The President
O&M.............................. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX.................................................................. 2,210,000 The President
O&M.............................. STILLWATER LAKE, PA........................................................................ 331,000 The President
O&M.............................. STOCKTON LAKE, MO.......................................................................... 3,828,000 The President, Senator Bond
O&M.............................. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV................................................................. 1,039,000 The President
O&M.............................. STURGEON BAY, WI........................................................................... 16,000 The President
O&M.............................. SUCCESS LAKE, CA........................................................................... 1,791,000 The President
O&M.............................. SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA..................................................................... 2,982,000 The President
O&M.............................. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV...................................................................... 2,044,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH.................................................................... 596,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IL............................................... 565,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IN............................................... 91,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ME............................................... 17,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MI............................................... 2,444,000 The President, Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MN............................................... 323,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ND............................................... 24,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, NY............................................... 551,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OH............................................... 223,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, PA............................................... 93,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WA............................................... 10,400,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WA............................................... 53,000 The President
O&M.............................. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WI............................................... 498,000 The President
O&M.............................. SUTTON LAKE, WV............................................................................ 2,210,000 The President
O&M.............................. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA...................................................................... 400,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
O&M.............................. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO........................................................................ 6,667,000 The President, Senator Bond
O&M.............................. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA................................................................. 120,000 The President
O&M.............................. TAMPA HARBOR, FL........................................................................... 4,550,000 The President, Senator Martinez
O&M.............................. TANGIPAHOA RIVER, LA....................................................................... 321,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY...................................................................... 1,312,000 The President
O&M.............................. TCHEFUNCTE RIVER & BOGUE FALIA, LA......................................................... 400,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK................................................................... 3,794,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN........................................................................ 20,219,000 The President
O&M.............................. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL....................................... 2,350,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Shelby,
Sessions, Wicker
O&M.............................. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS...................................................... 22,009,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Shelby,
Sessions, Wicker
O&M.............................. TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA.............................................................. 1,912,000 The President
O&M.............................. TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX................................................................ 1,482,000 The President, Senator Cornyn
O&M.............................. TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX...................................................... 1,000,000 The President, Senators Hutchison, Cornyn
O&M.............................. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM, WA & OR........................................................... 7,696,000 The President
O&M.............................. THOMASTON DAM, CT.......................................................................... 615,000 The President
O&M.............................. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR.................................................................. 2,200,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA.................................................................... 2,213,000 The President
O&M.............................. TIONESTA LAKE, PA.......................................................................... 3,115,000 The President
O&M.............................. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH.......................................................................... 4,701,000 The President, Senator Voinovich
O&M.............................. TOM JENKINS DAM, OH........................................................................ 791,000 The President
O&M.............................. TORONTO LAKE, KS........................................................................... 535,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX.................................................... 2,735,000 The President
O&M.............................. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT......................................................................... 681,000 The President, Senator Leahy
O&M.............................. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO.......................................................................... 1,290,000 The President, Senators Allard, Salazar
O&M.............................. TULLY LAKE, MA............................................................................. 543,000 The President
O&M.............................. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS...................................................................... 2,135,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE RIVER, MD.................................................... 135,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin
O&M.............................. TWO HARBORS, MN............................................................................ 300,000 The President
O&M.............................. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM......................................................................... 452,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI...................................................................... 400,000 Senator Kohl
O&M.............................. TYGART LAKE, WV............................................................................ 1,521,000 The President
O&M.............................. UMPQUA RIVER, OR........................................................................... 635,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. UNION CITY LAKE, PA........................................................................ 1,017,000 The President
O&M.............................. UNION LAKE, MO............................................................................. 10,000 The President
O&M.............................. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT...................................................................... 578,000 The President, Senator Leahy
O&M.............................. UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY, NM.......................................... 1,201,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
O&M.............................. VENTURA HARBOR, CA......................................................................... 3,095,000 The President
O&M.............................. W KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC......................................................... 2,977,000 The President, Senator Dole
O&M.............................. WACO LAKE, TX.............................................................................. 3,090,000 The President
O&M.............................. WAIANAE HARBOR, HI......................................................................... 1,000,000 Senator Inouye
O&M.............................. WALLACE LAKE, LA........................................................................... 200,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX....................................................................... 1,747,000 The President
O&M.............................. WALTER F GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA...................................................... 8,417,000 The President
O&M.............................. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC...................................................................... 25,000 The President
O&M.............................. WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, AL...................................................... 120,000 The President
O&M.............................. WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL...................................................... 405,000 The President
O&M.............................. WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, MS...................................................... 30,000 The President
O&M.............................. WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA...................................................... 54,000 The President
O&M.............................. WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA....................................................... 500,000 The President, Senators Landrieu, Vitter
O&M.............................. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA..................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Landrieu
O&M.............................. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA...................................................... 260,000 The President
O&M.............................. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL........................................................................ 1,099,000 The President
O&M.............................. WAURIKA LAKE, OK........................................................................... 1,093,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK............................................................. 4,695,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH........................................................... 865,000 The President
O&M.............................. WEST HILL DAM, MA.......................................................................... 674,000 The President
O&M.............................. WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL........................................................... 7,446,000 The President
O&M.............................. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT..................................................................... 568,000 The President
O&M.............................. WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY...................................................................... 250,000 The President, Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA......................................................................... 497,000 The President
O&M.............................. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI...................................................................... ................. Senators Levin, Stabenow
O&M.............................. WHITE RIVER, AR............................................................................ 52,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
O&M.............................. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ...................................................................... 171,000 The President
O&M.............................. WHITNEY LAKE, TX........................................................................... 8,559,000 The President
O&M.............................. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY..................................................................... 553,000 The President
O&M.............................. WICOMICO RIVER, MD......................................................................... 1,400,000 The President, Senators Mikulski, Cardin
O&M.............................. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR................................................... 210,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR....................................................... 62,000 The President
O&M.............................. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA............................................................... 34,000 The President
O&M.............................. WILLIAM H HARSHA LAKE, OH.................................................................. 1,837,000 The President
O&M.............................. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR...................................................................... 610,000 The President
O&M.............................. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE...................................................................... 3,750,000 The President, Senators Biden, Carper
O&M.............................. WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...................................................................... 13,000,000 The President, Senators Dole, Burr
O&M.............................. WILSON LAKE, KS............................................................................ 1,977,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
O&M.............................. WISTER LAKE, OK............................................................................ 678,000 The President, Senator Inhofe
O&M.............................. WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY........................................................ 7,834,000 The President, Senator McConnell
O&M.............................. WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN...................................................................... 107,000 The President
O&M.............................. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA.................................................................... 1,033,000 The President
O&M.............................. WOONSOCKET, RI............................................................................. 300,000 Senator Reed
O&M.............................. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX............................................................. 4,532,000 The President
O&M.............................. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR................................................................. 1,482,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. YAQUINA RIVER, OR.......................................................................... 300,000 Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY........................................................................ 1,180,000 The President
O&M.............................. YAZOO RIVER, MS............................................................................ 26,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
O&M.............................. YELLOW BEND PORT, AR....................................................................... 160,000 The President, Senators Lincoln, Pryor
O&M.............................. YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA................................................................... 471,000 The President
O&M.............................. YORK RIVER, VA............................................................................. 250,000 The President
O&M.............................. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD........................................................... 2,908,000 The President
O&M.............................. YUBA RIVER, CA............................................................................. 129,000 The President
O&M.............................. ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.................................... 5,000,000 The President
O&M.............................. AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH.......................................................... 690,000 The President
O&M.............................. ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE...................................... 4,750,000 The President
O&M.............................. BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M BUSINESS LINES........................................... 5,865,000 The President
O&M.............................. COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM............................................................. 2,475,000 The President
O&M.............................. CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION)....................................................... 1,500,000 The President
O&M.............................. DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE............................................................... 12,000,000 The President
O&M.............................. DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM....................................... 1,062,000 The President
O&M.............................. DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION (DOER)................................... 6,080,000 The President
O&M.............................. DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROGRAM (DOTS)....................................... 1,391,000 The President
O&M.............................. EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM....................................................... 270,000 The President
O&M.............................. FACILITY PROTECTION........................................................................ 12,000,000 The President
O&M.............................. GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL....................................................... 900,000 The President
O&M.............................. INDEPENDENT (PART) ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENT--STEWARDSHIP.................................. 500,000 The President
O&M.............................. INLAND NAVIGATION SAFETY INITIATIVE........................................................ 3,000,000 The President
O&M.............................. INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS.......................................................... 3,708,000 The President
O&M.............................. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS.............................................................. 1,780,000 The President
O&M.............................. MONITORING OFCOMPLETED NAVIGATION PROJECTS................................................. 1,575,000 The President
O&M.............................. NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY........................................................... 10,000,000 The President
O&M.............................. NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING................................................................... 13,900,000 The President, Senators Cochran, Wicker
O&M.............................. NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM................................................................ 15,000,000 The President
O&M.............................. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (NEPP)..................................................... 6,000,000 The President
O&M.............................. NATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES........................................... 3,326,000 The President
O&M.............................. NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR REALLOCATION............................................. 300,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT...................................................... 300,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION:.................................................................. ................. .............................................
O&M.............................. HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION..................................................... 725,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION--REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS........................................ 500,000 The President
O&M.............................. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION--STRAIGHTENING OF CHANNELS........................................ 50,000 The President
O&M.............................. WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS............................................................. 4,271,000 The President
O&M.............................. RECREATION ONE STOP (R1S) NATIONAL RECREATION RESERVATION.................................. 1,130,000 The President
O&M.............................. REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM....................................................... 4,500,000 The President, Senators Inouye, Lautenberg,
Menendez, Schumer, Dole, Burr, Wyden, Smith,
Reed, Whitehouse
O&M.............................. Delaware Estuary RSM, NJ............................................................... (300,000) Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
O&M.............................. Long Island Coastal Planning, NY....................................................... (500,000) Senator Schumer
O&M.............................. North Carolina RSM, NC................................................................. (600,000) Senator Dole, Burr
O&M.............................. South Coastal Rhode Island Regional Sediment Management Study, RI...................... (750,000) Senators Reed, Whitehouse
O&M.............................. South Jetty and Clatsop Spit, OR....................................................... (500,000) Senators Wyden, Smith
O&M.............................. Southeast Oahu Regional Sediment Management, HI........................................ (500,000) Senators Inouye, Akaka
O&M.............................. RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR REHAB................................................. 608,000 The President
O&M.............................. WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT (WOTS).................................................. 653,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... AK CHIN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT, AZ............................................ 9,900,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... ALBUQUERQUE METRO AREA WATER RECYCLING AND REUSE, NM....................................... 1,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Water and Related Resources...... ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT, CRSP, CO, NM, AZ.................................................. 50,000,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Allard,
Salazar
Water and Related Resources...... ARBUCKLE PROJECT, OK....................................................................... 289,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT........................................................ 1,000,000 Senator Kyl
Water and Related Resources...... BALMORHEA PROJECT, TX...................................................................... 58,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... BOISE AREA PROJECTS, ID.................................................................... 5,284,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... BURNT, MALHEUR, OWYHEE, AND POWER RIVER BASIN WATER OPTIMIZATION FEASIBILITY STUDY, OR..... 300,000 Senators Wyden, Smith
Water and Related Resources...... CACHUMA PROJECT, CA........................................................................ 2,118,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Water and Related Resources...... CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.......................................................... 352,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RECYCLING PLANT, CA..................................... 1,500,000 The President, Senators Feinstein, Boxer
Water and Related Resources...... CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT, TX................................................................. 145,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... CARLSBAD PROJECT, NM....................................................................... 3,784,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Water and Related Resources...... CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT, COLORADO RIVER BASIN.............................................. 28,350,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Kyl,
Bingaman
Water and Related Resources...... CENTRAL OKLAHOMA MASTER CONSERVATORY DISTRICT FEASIBILITY STUDY............................ 250,000 Senator Inhofe
Water and Related Resources...... CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTS, CA................................................................ ................. .............................................
Water and Related Resources...... AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION................................................................ 9,480,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT............................................................... 2,088,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... DELTA DIVISION......................................................................... 20,737,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... EAST SIDE DIVISION..................................................................... 4,534,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... FRIANT DIVISION........................................................................ 7,721,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Water and Related Resources...... MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS......................................................... 17,151,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Water and Related Resources...... REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINT....................................... 24,091,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION.............................................................. 9,428,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Water and Related Resources...... SAN FELIPE DIVISION.................................................................... 775,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION................................................................... 391,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SHASTA DIVISION........................................................................ 7,914,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... TRINITY RIVER DIVISION................................................................. 10,917,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Water and Related Resources...... WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS............................................................. 9,451,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT............................................... 8,919,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... YIELD FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION........................................................ 303,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... COLLBRAN PROJECT, CO....................................................................... 1,556,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................ 204,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM................................................. 2,350,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO--BIG THOMPSON PROJECT, CO......................................................... 13,292,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT, ID, OR, WA............................... 18,000,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT, WA................................................................. 13,548,000 The President, Senator Murray
Water and Related Resources...... CROOKED RIVER PROJECT, OR.................................................................. 851,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... DESCHUTES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT, OR................................................ 300,000 Senators Wyden, Smith
Water and Related Resources...... DESCHUTES PROJECT, OR...................................................................... 1,166,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
Water and Related Resources...... EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SUPPLY...................................................... 500,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Water and Related Resources...... EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS.................................................................... 828,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... FORT PECK RESERVATION/DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEM, MT................................... 15,000,000 Senators Baucus, Tester
Water and Related Resources...... FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT, CO............................................................... 229,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, CO............................................................. 8,295,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II, CO.................................................... 1,445,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... HALFWAY WASH PROJECT STUDY, NV............................................................. 200,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT, MT................................................................... 653,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... HUNTLEY PROJECT, MT........................................................................ 160,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... HYRUM PROJECT, UT.......................................................................... 178,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... IDAHO INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................... 179,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL WATER RECYCLING PROJECT, CA......................................... 1,000,000 Senators Feinstein, Boxer
Water and Related Resources...... IRVINE BASIN GROUND AND SURFACE WATER IMPROVEMENT, CA...................................... 1,000,000 Senator Feinstein
Water and Related Resources...... JICARILLA APACHE RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM, NM........................................ 1,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Water and Related Resources...... KANSAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................................................. 73,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
Water and Related Resources...... KENDRICK PROJECT, WY....................................................................... 3,333,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... KLAMATH PROJECT, OR, CA.................................................................... 25,000,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT, NV................................................................. 10,205,000 The President, Senator Reid
Water and Related Resources...... LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM, NV....................................................... 2,725,000 The President, Senators Reid, Ensign
Water and Related Resources...... LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL WETLANDSCA, NV......................................................... 100,000 The President, Senator Reid
Water and Related Resources...... LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY, CO...................................................... 3,095,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM, SD, IA, MN............................................. 30,000,000 Senators Johnson; Harkin; Grassley; Coleman,
Klobuchar; Thune
Water and Related Resources...... LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTS................................................................. 578,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... LONG BEACH AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROJECT, CA.................................... 692,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
Water and Related Resources...... LONG BEACH DESALINATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, CA....................................... 1,000,000 Senator Feinstein
Water and Related Resources...... LOWER COLORADO RIVER INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM, CO............................................ 243,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATER RESOURCES, TX................................................ 4,050,000 The President, Senator Hutchison
Water and Related Resources...... LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT, MT.............................................................. 46,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... MANCOS PROJECT, CO......................................................................... 146,000 The President, Senators Allard, Salazar
Water and Related Resources...... MCGEE CREEK PROJECT, OK.................................................................... 676,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT, SD......................................................... 15,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT, NM.............................................................. 25,700,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Water and Related Resources...... MILK RIVER PROJECT, MT..................................................................... 1,648,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS, ID................................................................. 5,558,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT, NE................................................................... 170,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... MNI WICONI PROJECT, SD..................................................................... 37,182,000 The President, Senators Johnson, Thune
Water and Related Resources...... MONTANA INVESTIGATIONS..................................................................... 134,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... MOON LAKE PROJECT, UT...................................................................... 76,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT, OK.................................................................. 523,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... NAVAJO NATION INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM, NM................................................... 77,000 The President, Senators Domenici
Water and Related Resources...... NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER SUPPLY, NM, UT, CO..................................................... 1,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Water and Related Resources...... NEBRASKA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................ 64,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... NEWTON PROJECT, UT......................................................................... 42,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... NORMAN PROJECT, OK......................................................................... 473,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... NORTH LAS VEGAS WATER REUSE, NV............................................................ 3,000,000 Senators Reid, Ensign
Water and Related Resources...... NORTH PLATTE PROJECT, WY................................................................... 1,880,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... NORTHERN ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.................................................... 320,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... NORTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM....................................................... 456,000 The President, Senator Bennett
Water and Related Resources...... NUECES RIVER PROJECT, TX................................................................... 558,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... ODESSA SUBAREA SPECIAL STUDY, WA........................................................... 1,000,000 The President, Senator Murray
Water and Related Resources...... OGDEN RIVER PROJECT, UT.................................................................... 368,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... OKLAHOMA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................ 128,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT, CA....................................... 558,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... OREGON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.............................................................. 444,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
Water and Related Resources...... ORLAND PROJECT, CA......................................................................... 703,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II, CO.................................................. 2,416,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... PARK CITY FEASIBILLTY STUDY, UT............................................................ 500,000 Senator Bennett
Water and Related Resources...... PECOS RIVER BASIN WATER SALVAGE PROJECT, NM................................................ 203,000 The President, Senators Domenici
Water and Related Resources...... PERKINS COUNTY RURAL WATER SYSTEM, SD...................................................... 2,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
Water and Related Resources...... PHOENIX METROPOLITAN WATER REUSE PROJECT, AZ............................................... 200,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN--GARRISON DIVERSION, ND.......................................... 69,986,000 The President, Senator Dorgan
Water and Related Resources...... PINE RIVER PROJECT, CO..................................................................... 335,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... PROVO RIVER PROJECT, UT.................................................................... 1,366,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... RAPID VALLEY PROJECT, DEERFIELD DAM, SD.................................................... 86,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... RIO GRANDE PROJECT, NM..................................................................... 4,342,000 The President, Senators Domenici
Water and Related Resources...... ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MONTANA RURAL WATER SYSTEM........................................ 10,000,000 Senators Baucus, Tester
Water and Related Resources...... ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION, OR............................................. 902,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SALT RIVER PROJECT, AZ..................................................................... 600,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT, CA............................................................ 700,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SAN ANGELO PROJECT, TX..................................................................... 402,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT, AZ........................................... 325,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SAN DIEGO AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM, CA..................................... 3,000,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SAN GABRIEL BASIN PROJECT, CA.............................................................. 700,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SAN JOSE AREA WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM, CA...................................... 250,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM, NM............................................ 59,000 The President, Senators Domenici
Water and Related Resources...... SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CO................................................................ 4,637,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SAVAGE RAPIDS DAM REMOVAL, OR.............................................................. 3,000,000 The President, Senators Wyden, Smith
Water and Related Resources...... SCOFIELD PROJECT, UT....................................................................... 133,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SHOSHONE PROJECT, WY....................................................................... 749,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SOLANO PROJECT, CA......................................................................... 4,489,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SOUTH/CENTRAL ARIZONA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................... 718,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SOUTHERN ARIZONA WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT PROJECT....................................... 2,969,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM................................................. 260,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO/WEST TEXAS INV. PROGRAM................................................ 57,000 The President, Senators Domenici
Water and Related Resources...... SOUTHERN UTAH INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM....................................................... 121,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT, UT.............................................................. 223,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SUN RIVER PROJECT, MT...................................................................... 350,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... TEXAS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................... 146,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... TUALATIN BASIN WATER SUPPLY PROJECT, OR.................................................... 400,000 Senators Wyden, Smith
Water and Related Resources...... TUALATIN PROJECT, OR....................................................................... 381,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... TUALATIN PROJECT TITLE TRANSFER AND FACILITY ASSESSMENT STUDY, OR.......................... 106,000 Senators Wyden, Smith
Water and Related Resources...... TUCUMCARI PROJECT, NM...................................................................... 58,000 The President, Senators Domenici
Water and Related Resources...... UMATILLA PROJECT, OR....................................................................... 3,932,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT, CO.................................................................... 264,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS, CO........................................................ 250,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... UPPER RIO GRANDE BASIN INVESTIGATIONS, NM.................................................. 29,000 The President, Senators Domenici
Water and Related Resources...... VENTURA RIVER PROJECT, CA.................................................................. 420,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT, OK.................................................................... 481,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS................................................................... 95,000 The President, Senator Murray
Water and Related Resources...... WASHINGTON INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM.......................................................... 145,000 The President, Senator Murray
Water and Related Resources...... WASHITA BASIN PROJECT, OK.................................................................. 1,426,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... WEBER BASIN PROJECT, UT.................................................................... 1,748,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... WEBER RIVER PROJECT, UT.................................................................... 137,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... WICHITA PROJECT--EQUUS BEDS DIVISION, KS................................................... 1,050,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
Water and Related Resources...... WICHITA-CHENEY PROJECT, KS................................................................. 385,000 The President, Senators Brownback, Roberts
Water and Related Resources...... WYOMING INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM............................................................. 26,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... YAKIMA PROJECT, WA......................................................................... 8,500,000 The President, Senator Murray
Water and Related Resources...... YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT, WA........................................... 8,503,000 The President, Senator Murray
Water and Related Resources...... YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER STORAGE PROJECT, WA............................................... 500,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
Water and Related Resources...... YUMA AREA PROJECTS, AZ..................................................................... 21,863,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... YUMA EAST WETLANDS, AZ..................................................................... 1,500,000 Senator Kyl
Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL, TITLE I............................................. 9,444,000 The President, Senator Kyl
Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL, TITLE II............................................ 5,850,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, SECTION 5.......................................................... 5,913,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER STORAGE, SECTION 8.......................................................... 710,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM........................................... 265,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... DAM SAFETY PROGRAM:........................................................................ ................. .............................................
Water and Related Resources...... DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.......................................................... 1,250,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... INITIATE SOD CORRECTIVE ACTION......................................................... 71,500,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SAFETY OF EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS.................................................. 18,500,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... DROUGHT EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM....................................................... 500,000 The President, Senator Inouye
Water and Related Resources...... EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM............................................. 1,422,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION................................................. 21,939,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bennett,
Salazar, Bingaman, Hatch
Water and Related Resources...... ENVIRONMENTAL & INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ACTIVITIES........................................ 1,739,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION....................................................... 973,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES......................................................... 6,254,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... FEDERAL BUILDING SEISMIC SAFETY PROGRAM.................................................... 1,384,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... GENERAL PLANNING STUDIES................................................................... 2,163,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.......................................................... 7,481,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM.................................................... 16,400,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS..................................................... 714,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM............................................................ 7,020,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING............................................ 1,658,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... OPERATIONS AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT.......................................................... 1,206,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN.................................................................. 40,740,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... POWER PROGRAM SERVICES..................................................................... 1,097,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM........................................................... 796,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION............................................................. 2,132,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... RECLAMATION RECREATION MANAGEMENT (TITLE XXVII)............................................ 1,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Water and Related Resources...... RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION........................................ 951,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................................................................... ................. .............................................
Water and Related Resources...... DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM................................................ 3,975,000 The President, Senators Domenici, Bingaman
Water and Related Resources...... SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM............................................................. 9,000,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... RURAL WATER LEGISLATION TITLE I............................................................ 1,000,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... SITE SECURITY.............................................................................. 28,950,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE PROGRAM.............................................. 3,300,000 The President, Senators Reid, Domenici
Water and Related Resources...... UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES--TECHNICAL SUPPORT...................................... 93,000 The President
Water and Related Resources...... WATER FOR AMERICA INITIATIVE............................................................... 19,000,000 The President, Senators Reid; Domenici,
Bingaman
California Bay-Delta Restoration. California Bay-Delta Restoration, CA....................................................... 42,000,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
CUPCA............................ Central Utah Project Completion Act, UT.................................................... 42,000,000 The President
CVPRF............................ Central Valley Project Restoration Fund, CA................................................ 56,079,000 The President, Senator Feinstein
DOE--EERC........................ Algal-Base Renewable Energy for Nevada, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV for the 750,000 Senator Reid
development of algal-based energy system.
DOE--EERE........................ Alternative Energy for Higher Education, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, for a solar 1,200,000 Senators Nelson (Ben), Hagel
energy project.
DOE--EERE........................ Alternative Energy School of the Future, Clark County, Andre Agassi Charitable Foundation, 1,250,000 Senator Reid
Las Vegas, NV, for a solar fuel cell system.
DOE--EERE........................ Alternative Fuel Cell Membranes for National Energy Independence, University of Southern 1,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Mississippi, USM, MS, for advanced fuel cell membrane research.
DOE--EERE........................ Anaerobic Digester and Combined Heat Power Project, Washington Suburban Sanitary 600,000 Senator Cardin
Commission, Montgomery and Prince George's Counties, MD, for a study on anaerobic power
generation.
DOE--EERE........................ Bioenergy and Bioproducts Laboratory, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, to conduct research on 1,000,000 Senators Shelby, Sessions
biofuel conversion, biofuel testing, and certification.
DOE--EERE........................ Bioenergy Demonstration Project: Value-Added Products from Renewable Fuels, University of 2,000,000 Senators Nelson (Ben), Hagel
Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, for research on the byproducts of biofuel production.
DOE--EERE........................ Biogas Center of Excellence, Michigan Economic Development Corporation, Flint, MI, for a 1,000,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
center for the production of biogas.
DOE--EERE........................ Biomass Energy Resources Center, Biomass Energy Resource Center, Montpelier, VT, for the 1,500,000 Senator Leahy
installation of new small scale technology.
DOE--EERE........................ Biomass Gasification Research and Development Project, Port of Benton, Richland, WA, for 1,000,000 Senator Murray
the gasification and research of biomass.
DOE--EERE........................ Biorefinery for Ethanol, Chemicals, Animal Feed and Biomaterials from Sugarcane Bagasse, 1,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, for a biomass conversion
project.
DOE--EERE........................ Bipolar Wafer Cell NiMH Lithium Ion Battery, Electro Energy, Danbury, CT, to advance wafer 2,000,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
cell battery technology.
DOE--EERC........................ Carbon Neutral Green Campus, Nevada State College, Clark County, NV for environmental 250,000 Senator Reid
sustainability.
DOE--EERE........................ Center for Biomass Utilization, University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental 2,000,000 Senator Dorgan
Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, for research on biomass production and its byproducts.
DOE--EERE........................ Center for Nanoscale Energy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, for nanomaterials 5,000,000 Senator Dorgan
research.
DOE--EERE........................ Central Vermont Recovered Biomass Facility, Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund, Montpelier, VT, 1,000,000 Senator Leahy
for a digester system.
DOE--EERE........................ Chariton Valley Densification--Phase II, Chariton Valley RC&D, Inc, Centerville, IA, for 1,000,000 Senator Harkin
research on switchgrass.
DOE--EERE........................ Christmas Valley Renewable Energy Development, Oregon Department of Energy, Salem, OR, for 400,000 Senators Wyden, Smith
the development of a renewable energy-producing facility.
DOE--EERE........................ City of Miami Green Initiative, City of Miami, Miami, FL, to reduce greenhouse gas 1,000,000 Senator Nelson (Bill)
emissions and fuel consumption in the city.
DOE--EERE........................ Clean Power Energy Research Consortium, Nicholls State University, Louisiana State 2,000,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
University, University of New Orleans, Tulane University, Southern University, University
of Louisiana, Thibodeaux, LA, for a joint venture of Lousiana universities to promote
alternative fuels.
DOE--EERE........................ Clean Technology Commercialization Initiative, Ben Franklin Technology Partners, 1,000,000 Senators Specter, Casey
Harrisburg, PA, to support clean and alternative energy technologies.
DOE--EERE........................ Coastal Ohio Wind Project, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, for wind 1,000,000 Senators Brown, Voinovich
energy research.
DOE--EERE........................ Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research, The Consortium for Plant Biotechnology 1,000,000 Senators Brown, Dorgan, Harkin, Inouye,
Research, Inc., St. Simons Island, N/A, to support university-industry research and Johnson, Klobuchar, Landrieu, Levin, Ben
technology transfer projects. Nelson, Murray, Stabenow, McConnell,
Chambliss
DOE--EERE........................ Cooling Heating and Power and Bio-Fuel Application Center, Mississippi State University, 2,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Mississippi State, MS, to conduct research on increased energy efficiency through the use
of electric and thermal delivery systems.
DOE--EERC........................ Development of Biofuels Using Ionic Transfer Membranes, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 600,000 Senator Reid
Clark County, NV for biofuels research.
DOE--EERE........................ Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks, University of Hawaii, College of Tropical 1,500,000 Senator Inouye
Agriculture and Human Resources, Honolulu, HI, for a tropical bioenergy project.
DOE--EERE........................ Dueco Plug-In Hybrid Engines, Dueco Inc., Waukesha, WI, for new plug-in hybrid electric 2,000,000 Senator Kohl
propulsion technology.
DOE--EERE........................ Energy Production Through Anaerobic Digestion, New Jersey Department of Agriculture, 500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Trenton, NJ, for anaerobic digester technology.
DOE--EERE........................ Fluid Flow Optimization of Aerogel Blanket Manufacturing Process, Aspen Aerogels, 1,500,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Northborough, MA, for energy-efficient insulation research.
DOE--EERE........................ Forestry biofuel statewide Collaboration Center, Michigan Economic Development Corporation, 1,500,000 Senators Levin, Stabenow
Upper Peninsula, MI, to improve the supply chain for woody biomass.
DOE--EERE........................ Genetic Improvements of Switchgrass, University of Rhode Island at Kingston, Kingston, RI, 1,500,000 Senator Reed
to improve switchgrass for use as a biofuel.
DOE--EERE........................ Geothermal Power Generation Plant, Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT), Klamath Falls, OR, 1,600,000 Senators Wyden, Smith
for a geothermal power plant.
DOE--EERE........................ Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, to continue and 650,000 Senator Reid
expand the Center's activities in promoting geothermal power.
DOE--EERE........................ Great Plains Wind Power Test Facility, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, for the testing, 2,000,000 Senator Hutchison
characterization, and improvement of grid-connected wind turbines and wind-driven water
desalination systems.
DOE--EERE........................ Hawaii-New Mexico Sustainable Energy Security Partnership, Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, 3,000,000 Senators Inouye, Domenici, Akaka
Honolulu, HI, to continue the analysis and technology efforts of the Partnership.
DOE--EERC........................ Hollow Glass Microspheres, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark County, NV for hydrogen 550,000 Senator Reid
storage methods research.
DOE--EERE........................ Hydroelectric Power Generation, Quincy, City of Quincy, Quincy, IL, for Quincy's efforts to 500,000 Senator Durbin
install hydroelectric plants at locks and dams.
DOE--EERE........................ Hydrogen Storage System for Vehicular Propulsion, Delaware State U., Dover, Delaware State 1,500,000 Senators Biden, Carper
University, Dover, DE, to develop a hydrogen storage system.
DOE--EERE........................ Integrated Solar Energy Windows, PPG Industries, Pittsburgh, PA, for the development of 1,000,000 Senator Specter
next generation, transparent photovoltaic (PV) solar cells.
DOE--EERE........................ Integrated Sustainability Initiative, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, to promote campus 1,000,000 Senator Reid
sustainabil- ity.
DOE--EERE........................ Kansas Biofuels Certification Laboratory, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, for analysis 1,000,000 Senator Brownback
of biofuels, measuring emissions of biofuels, and research of biofuel cells.
DOE--EERE........................ La Samilla Solar Trough Storage Project, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, for 2,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
solar trough storage advancement.
DOE--EERE........................ Landfill Gas Utilization Plant, County of Chautauqua, Chautauqua County, NY, for landfill- 2,000,000 Senator Schumer
gas power generation.
DOE--EERE........................ Lightweight Composites for Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Hydrogen Storage, West Virginia 500,000 Senator Byrd
University, Morgantown, WV, to advance the use of lightweight composite materials for
vehicles.
DOE--EERE........................ Maine Tidal Power Initiative, University of Maine, Orono, ME, to develop protocols that 1,000,000 Senators Snowe, Collins
allow locations in northern New England to be prioritized for tidal energy development.
DOE--EERE........................ MidSouth/Southeast Bioenergy Consortium, MidSouth/Southeast Bioenergy Consortium, 1,500,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor, Chambliss
Fayetteville, AR, for research on the byproducts of biofuel production.
DOE--EERE........................ Multifunctional Solar Energy Systems Research, Utah State University, Logan, UT, for 1,000,000 Senator Bennett
research and development of multifunctional electricity-producing systems.
DOE--EERE........................ National Agriculture-Based Industrial Lubricants (NABL), Biomass (IA), University of 600,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA, for the advancement of biobased industrial and automotive
lubricants and for biofuels services.
DOE--EERE........................ National Center for Commercialization of Bioenergy, Kansas State University, Olathe, KS, 750,000 Senator Roberts
for the commercialization of near market bioenergy technologies to meet national renewable
fuel mandates.
DOE--EERE........................ National Wind Energy Center, University of Houston, Houston, TX, to focus on developing 2,000,000 Senator Hutchison
advanced offshore wind technology for cost-effective, renewable clean energy production.
DOE--EERC........................ Nevada Institute for Renewable Energy Commercialization, Incline Village, NV, for the 500,000 Senator Reid
promotion of renewable energy in business.
DOE--EERE........................ New School Green Building, The New School, New York, NY, for an environmentaly-friendly 2,000,000 Senator Schumer
school facility.
DOE--EERE........................ North Carolina Center for Automotive Research, North Carolina Center for Automotive 1,000,000 Senator Dole
Research, Jackson, NC, to equip the Chassis Dynamics Laboratory.
DOE--EERE........................ Offshore Renewable Energy, Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council, Wakefield, 700,000 Senators Reed, Whitehouse
RI, to develop an Ocean Special Area Management Plan.
DOE--EERE........................ Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing Center (OAEMC), Edison Welding Institute, Columbus, OH, 1,000,000 Senators Brown, Voinovich
for an advanced energy manufacturing program.
DOE--EERE........................ Oregon Solar Highway, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, OR, to demonstrate the 1,000,000 Senators Smith, Wyden
feasibility of large-scale deployment of solar photovoltaic technology.
DOE--EERE........................ Pecos Valley Biomass Energy Project, NM, Clark County School District, Roswell, NM, for a 2,500,000 Senators Bingaman, Domenici
bio-methane gas system.
DOE--EERE........................ Placer County Biomass Utilization Pilot Project, Placer County, Auburn, CA, for a biomass 1,500,000 Senator Feinstein
facility.
DOE--EERE........................ Pope/Douglas Third Combuster Expansion, Pope/Douglas Solid Waste Management, Alexandria, 1,000,000 Senators Coleman, Klobuchar
MN, to increase waste to energy capacity.
DOE--EERE........................ Power Grid Reliability and Security, Washington State University, Washington State 1,000,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
University, Pullman, WA, to create solutions for grid reliability and security
enhancements.
DOE--EERE........................ Renewable Energy Clean Air Project, County of Koochiching, International Falls, MN, for syn- 700,000 Senator Klobuchar
gas energy production.
DOE--EERE........................ Renewable Energy Development Venture, Pacific International Center for High Technology 2,500,000 Senator Inouye
Research, Honolulu, HI, to expand potential energy resources in the State of Hawaii.
DOE--EERE........................ Renewable Energy Feasibility Study, City of Trenton, Trenton, NJ, to examine possible 500,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
renewable energy sources.
DOE--EERE........................ Renewable Energy Integration and Development, Clark and Washoe Counties, Nevada System of 2,000,000 Senator Reid
Higher Education (NSHE), Las Vegas, NV, for a renewable energy center.
DOE--EERE........................ Renewable/Sustainable Biomass Project, Alaska Village Initiatives, Alaska, AK, for use of 500,000 Senator Stevens
biomass for energy generation in rural Alaska villages.
DOE--EERE........................ Sandia National Lab Concentrating Solar, Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, NM, for 3,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
concentrating solar activities.
DOE--EERE........................ Solar Panels and Environmental Education, County of Essex, Newark, NJ, for the installation 1,000,000 Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
of solar panels to further environmental education.
DOE--EERE........................ Solar Park Pilot Project, City of St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, FL, to develop a 1,000,000 Senator Nelson (Bill)
renewable energy plan for the City's parks.
DOE--EERE........................ Solar Power Generation, Township of Cherry Hill, Cherry Hill, NJ, for solar technology..... 300,000 Senator Lautenberg
DOE--EERE........................ Solar Thermal Demonstration Project, Clark County School District, Clark County, NV, for 1,250,000 Senator Reid
solar technology for schools.
DOE--EERE........................ Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative Design, Mississippi State University, 4,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Mississippi State, MS, to reduce emissions and posture the US for less reliance on foreign
oil.
DOE--EERE........................ Southwest Alaska Regional Geothermal Energy Project, Naknek Electrical Association, Naknek, 3,000,000 Senators Stevens, Murkowski
AK, for an exploratory well for a 25MW geothermal plant to serve villages in rural Alaska.
DOE--EERE........................ Stamford Waste-to-Energy Project (CT), City of Stamford, Stamford, CT, to convert dried 2,000,000 Senators Dodd, Lieberman
sludge into clean, renewable energy.
DOE--EERE........................ Strategic Biomass Initiative, Mississippi Technology Alliance, Jackson, MS, to encourage 500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
bioenergy industry in the southeast.
DOE--EERE........................ Sun Grant Initiative, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, for regional biomass 4,000,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
feedstock research and education.
DOE--EERE........................ Sustainable Energy for Homes and Businesses, Vermont Department of Public Service, 750,000 Senator Sanders
Montpelier, VT, to support Vermont's wind and solar program.
DOE--EERE........................ Sustainable Energy for Vermont Schools Competition, Vermont Superintendents Association, 900,000 Senator Sanders
Montpelier, VT, for school-based projects to highlight sustainable energy technologies.
DOE--EERE........................ Sustainable Energy Research Center, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, to 10,500,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
develop new engineering and scientific knowledge and serve as a catalyst to create
sustainable energy industries in the southeastern United States.
DOE--EERC........................ Sustainable Las Vegas, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark County, NV to increase 1,000,000 Senator Reid
conservation and sustainability in Las Vegas.
DOE--EERE........................ The Institute for Energy, Environment and Sustainability, Johnson County Community College, 750,000 Senator Brownback
Overland Park, KS, to serve as a resource for local education, business and civic entities
and would include education and training in renewable energy.
DOE--EERE........................ Thin Film Photovoltaic Research & Development, Omega Optical, Brattleboro, VT, to research 1,000,000 Senator Leahy
solar panel technology.
DOE--EERE........................ Tidal Energy Study, Snohomish County PUD No. 1, Everett, WA, for environmental studies of 500,000 Senator Murray
possible tidal energy pilot plants.
DOE--EERE........................ Transportable Emissions Testing Lab, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, for mobile 1,000,000 Senator Byrd
labs that test bus emissions.
DOE--EERE........................ USD Catalysis Group for Alternative Energy, South Dakota Catalysis Group, Vermilion, SD, 1,100,000 Senators Johnson, Thune
for the development of metal oxide and carbon catalyzed reactions technologies.
DOE--EERE........................ Vermont Biofuels Initiative, Vermont Sustainable Jobs Fund, Montpelier, VT, to test the 1,500,000 Senator Leahy
feasibility of different uses of biodiesel.
DOE--EERE........................ Wind Turbine Model and Pilot Project for Alternative Energy, University of Delaware, 1,500,000 Senators Biden, Carper
Newark, DE, for a shore-side wind turbine.
DOE--EM DEFENSE.................. Characteristics and Clean-up of US Nuclear Legacy, Institute for Clean Energy Technology, 4,000,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Mississippi State, MS, for renewal of the cooperative agreement with the DOE to help
expedite the cleanup of the nuclear defense sites.
DOE--EM DEFENSE.................. Water Resources Data, Modeling, and Visualization Center, Desert Research Institute, Washoe 1,000,000 Senator Reid
County, NV for water research.
DOE--EM DEFENSE.................. WIPP Records Archive, WIPP, Carlsbad, NM, for records archiving............................ 4,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
DOE--EM NON-DEFENSE.............. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Initiative, The University of Louisville, 1,000,000 Senator McConnell
Louisville, KY, to provide data management support for research in genomics and
metabolomic programs.
DOE--EM NON-DEFENSE.............. Southwest Experimental Fast Oxide Reactor Decommissioning (SEFOR), University of Arkansas 2,000,000 Senators Lincoln, Pryor
in Fayetteville, Fayetteville, AR, for the decommissioning of SEFOR in Strickler, AR.
DOE--FE.......................... Arctic Energy Office, Arctic Energy Office, Fairbanks, AK, for research in fossil energy, 6,000,000 Senator Stevens
natural gas technologies, and oil technologies.
DOE--FE.......................... Center for Zero Emissions Research and Technology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 4,500,000 Senators Baucus, Tester
for research related to carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions, and clean power
generation.
DOE--FE.......................... CO2 Capture/Sequestration Research, Pennsylvania State University, Centre County, PA, to 500,000 Senator Casey
study carbon capture and sequestration.
DOE--FE.......................... Fossil Fuel Research & Development, University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental 4,000,000 Senator Dorgan
Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, to address strategic national energy issues.
DOE--FE.......................... Gulf Of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium, University of Mississippi, University of 1,200,000 Senators Cochran, Wicker
Mississippi, MS, to develop and deploy an integrated multi-sensor station on the seafloor
in the Gulf of Mexico.
DOE--FE.......................... Long Term Environmental and Economic Impacts of the Development of a Coal Liquefaction 500,000 Senator Byrd
Sector in China, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, for the study of the
development of commercial liquefaction plants.
DOE--FE.......................... Multi-Year Demonstration of Carbon Sequestration in a Deep Saline Reservoir, Xcel Energy, 1,500,000 Senators Salazar, Allard
Denver, CO, to determine the feasibility of geologic CO2 sequestration in a deep saline
reservoir.
DOE--FE.......................... National Center for Hydrogen Technology, University of North Dakota Energy and 3,000,000 Senator Dorgan
Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, for the development of hydrogen
technologies.
DOE--FE.......................... Shale Oil Upgrading Utilizing Ionic Conductive Membranes, Ceramatec, Inc., Salt Lake City, 1,000,000 Senators Hatch, Bennett
UT, to develop processes for upgrading oil shale, making oil extract high quality and
affordable.
DOE--FE.......................... Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, Siemens Power Generation, Pittsburgh, PA, to support development, 2,000,000 Senator Specter
construction, and testing of the fuel processing systems.
DOE--FE.......................... The Center for Advanced Separation Technology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, to 3,000,000 Senators McConnell, Warner, Webb
support efforts to develop new technologies that reduce the cost of separations in coal,
metals, and industrial mining operations.
DOE--FE.......................... University of Kentucky Coal-Derived Low Energy Materials for Sustainable Construction 1,000,000 Senators McConnell, Bunning
Project, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, to research alternative uses for coal
combustion byproducts.
DOE--FE.......................... Refining Capacity Study, North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives, Mandan, 500,000 Senator Dorgan
ND, to study refining capacity.
DOE--FE.......................... Utah Center for Ultra Clean Coal Utilization & Heavy Oil Research, University of Utah, Salt 4,000,000 Senator Bennett
Lake City, UT, to continue research on the commercial viability and validity of
unconventional and clean energy technologies.
DOE--NE.......................... Technologies Ventures Corporation, Technologies Ventures Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, for 3,000,000 Senator Domenici
technology transfer activities.
DOE--Nuclear Waste............... Cooperative agreement between the Department of Energy and Inyo County, Inyo County, 1,600,000 Senator Feinstein
Independence, CA, to complete studies under the cooperative agreement.
DOE--Nuclear Waste............... Inyo County Affected Unit of Local Government, County of Inyo, Inyo County, CA, to conduct 350,000 Senator Feinstein
scientific oversight responsibilities and participate in licensing activities.
DOE--ODA......................... Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN, Paducah, Portsmouth, 1,050,000 Senator McConnell
and Oak Ridge Medical Monitoring, Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN, to
provide for continued conventional medical work-ups and lung scans and re-scans for
current and former workers.
DOE--OE.......................... Alternate Fuel for Cement Processing, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, to focus on the 1,500,000 Senator Shelby
integration of the burning process into existing kiln systems in Lafarge plants,
maximization of burn efficiency and minimization of waste/discharge.
DOE--OE.......................... Center of Excellence Lab, Bismarck State College, Bismarck, ND, to develop a state-of-the 1,400,000 Senator Dorgan
art lab.
DOE--OE.......................... Energy Development and Reliability, Bismarck State College, Bismarck, ND, to promote and 300,000 Senator Dorgan
advance the region's energy industry.
DOE--OE.......................... Integrated Distribution Management System, Southern Company, Birmingham, AL, to provide 1,500,000 Senator Shelby
seamlessly integrated set of information systems providing all of the major functionality
needed to operate an electric distribution system.
DOE--OE.......................... Iowa Stored Energy Plant, Iowa Associations of Municipal Utilities, Ankeny, IA, for 1,500,000 Senator Harkin, Grassley
compressed air energy storage project.
DOE--OE.......................... Navajo Electrification Demonstration Program, Navajo Tribal Utility Authority, Fort 2,000,000 Senators Bingaman, Domenici
Defiance, AZ, to provide electric power to homes on the reservation.
DOE--OE.......................... North Dakota Energy Workforce Development, Bismarck State College, Bismarck, ND, for a 1,900,000 Senator Dorgan
workforce development programs.
DOE--OE.......................... San Mateo County Solar Genesis Project, County of San Mateo, Redwood City, CA, for a solar 1,500,000 Senator Boxer
power electric generation facility.
DOE--OE.......................... SmartGrid Integration Lab, Colorado State University, Ft Collins, CO, to demonstrate core 1,000,000 Senators Allard, Salazar
smart grid capabilities.
DOE--OE.......................... Technology Development, Red River Valley Research Corridor, Grand Forks, ND, to promote and 300,000 Senator Dorgan
advance the research, development and commercialization activities occurring in North
Dakota's Red River Valley Research Corridor.
DOE--SC.......................... Antibodies Research, University of North Dakota Research Foundation, Grand Forks, ND, to 2,750,000 Senator Dorgan
research and develop antibodies for disease threats.
DOE--SC.......................... Bionanotechnology: Research and Commercialization, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, 1,500,000 Senators Landrieu, Vitter
for bionanotechnology and biofuels research.
DOE--SC.......................... Center for Advanced Energy Studies, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, to conduct 3,000,000 Senators Craig, Crapo
a pilot program to demonstrate the Nuclear Science Talent Expansion program.
DOE--SC.......................... Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, for disease 2,000,000 Senator Byrd
detection and diagnosis research.
DOE--SC.......................... Center for Nanomedicine and Cellular Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of MD, 750,000 Senator Mikulski
Baltimore, MD, for research.
DOE--SC.......................... Center of Excellence and Hazardous Materials, Carlsbad, NM, for applied research........... 2,000,000 Senator Domenici
DOE--SC.......................... Climate Change Modeling Capability, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for climate 5,000,000 Senator Domenici
change modeling.
DOE--SC.......................... Computing Capability, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, to increase supercomputing 5,000,000 Senator Dorgan
power.
DOE--SC.......................... Contrast Media and Wound Closure Reduction Study, University of Mississippi, University of 650,000 Senator Cochran
Mississippi, MS, for efficiency in Iodine-based medical imaging for diagnostic procedures.
DOE--SC.......................... Facilitating blood-brain barrier research, Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, for 1,500,000 Senators Murray, Cantwell
cooperative research.
DOE--SC.......................... Former Workers Medical Surveillance Programs, State University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, for 1,000,000 Senators Harkin, Grassley
medical surveillance, needs assessment and former worker medical screenings.
DOE--SC.......................... Functional MRI Research, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, to 1,250,000 Senator Leahy
support MRI research.
DOE--SC.......................... Intermountain Center for River Restoration and Rehabilitation, Utah State University, 600,000 Senator Bennett
Logan, UT, to continue researching river restoration and environmental management.
DOE--SC.......................... Marine Systems Research, University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, MA, for research 500,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
into aquatic ecosystems, marine biology, fisheries and mammal sustainability.
DOE--SC.......................... Materials and Energy Research Development, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, for 1,000,000 Senator Landrieu, Vitter
environmental and materials research.
DOE--SC.......................... Matter-Radiation Interactions in Extremes, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for 7,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
advanced materials testing.
DOE--SC.......................... Mind Institute, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, to advance the understanding of 12,000,000 Senators Domenici, Bingaman
mental illness through advanced brain imaging.
DOE--SC.......................... Neuroscience research, Dominican University, River Forest, IL, for research in to memory 500,000 Senator Durbin
dysfunc- tions.
DOE--SC.......................... Pioneer Valley Life Sciences Institute Biomedical Research, Pioneer Valley Life Science 500,000 Senators Kennedy, Kerry
Institute, Springfield, MA, for research programs.
DOE--SC.......................... Regenerative Medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, 500,000 Senator Durbin
IL, for regenerative medicine research.
DOE--SC.......................... Research into Proton Beam Thearapy, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, to research 1,500,000 Senator Murray
new uses for proton beam therapy.
DOE--SC.......................... Sandia Nanotechnology Engineering Center, Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, NM, for 5,000,000 Senator Domenici
nanotechnology engineering activities.
DOE--SC.......................... Supercapacitors, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, for work to be done in 1,500,000 Senator Schumer, Bingaman
Ostego, NY on supercapacitors.
DOE--SC.......................... Sustainable Biofuels Development Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, to 1,500,000 Senator Salazar
support research efforts in alternative energy technologies.
DOE--Weapons..................... Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, to promote prosperity in New 1,000,000 Senator Domenici
Mexico through economic development.
DOE-WEAPONS...................... Electronic Record for Worker Safety and Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Clark 1,500,000 Senator Reid
County to help the Nevada Site Office improve responses to DOE worker claims.
DOE--Weapons..................... Renewable Energy Planning, National Nuclear Security Administration, Nevada Test Site, NV, 500,000 Senator Reid
for planning to maximize renewable energy production at the Site.
DOE--Weapons..................... Restore Manhattan Project Sites, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM, for historic 500,000 Senator Domenici
preserva- tion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2009
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate Committee recommendation
compared with (+ or -)
Item 2008 Budget estimate Committee ---------------------------------
appropriation recommendation 2008
appropriation Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers--Civil
Investigations..................................................... 167,261 91,000 166,000 -1,261 +75,000
Rescissions.................................................... -100 ............... ............... +100 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Investigations........................................ 167,161 91,000 166,000 -1,161 +75,000
Construction....................................................... 2,294,029 1,402,000 2,004,500 -289,529 +602,500
Rescissions.................................................... -4,688 ............... ............... +4,688 ...............
Emergency appropriation........................................ ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Construction.......................................... 2,289,341 1,402,000 2,004,500 -284,841 +602,500
Mississippi River and tributaries.................................. 387,402 240,000 365,000 -22,402 +125,000
Operations and Maintenance......................................... 2,243,637 2,475,000 2,220,000 -23,637 -255,000
Regulatory program................................................. 180,000 180,000 183,000 +3,000 +3,000
FUSRAP............................................................. 140,000 130,000 140,000 ............... +10,000
Flood control and coastal emergencies.............................. ............... 40,000 40,000 +40,000 ...............
General Expenses................................................... 175,046 177,000 177,000 +1,954 ...............
Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)............ 4,500 6,000 4,500 ............... -1,500
====================================================================================
Total, title I, Department of Defense--Civil................. 5,587,087 4,741,000 5,300,000 -287,087 +559,000
Appropriations........................................... (5,591,875) (4,741,000) (5,300,000) (-291,875) (+559,000)
Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Rescissions.............................................. (-4,788) ............... ............... (+4,788) ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah Project Completion Account
Central Utah project construction.................................. 40,404 39,373 39,373 -1,031 ...............
Fish, wildlife, and recreation mitigation andconservation.......... 976 987 987 +11 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 41,380 40,360 40,360 -1,020 ...............
Program oversight and administration............................... 1,620 1,640 1,640 +20 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Central Utah project completion account............... 43,000 42,000 42,000 -1,000 ...............
Bureau of Reclamation
Water and related resources........................................ 949,882 779,320 927,320 -22,562 +148,000
Rescission..................................................... ............... -175,000 ............... ............... +175,000
Central Valley project restoration fund............................ 59,122 56,079 56,079 -3,043 ...............
California Bay-Delta restoration................................... 40,098 32,000 42,000 +1,902 +10,000
Policy and administration.......................................... 58,811 59,400 59,400 +589 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Bureau of Reclamation................................. 1,107,913 751,799 1,084,799 -23,114 +333,000
====================================================================================
Total, title II, Department of the Interior.................. 1,150,913 793,799 1,126,799 -24,114 +333,000
====================================================================================
TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Programs
Energy efficiency and renewable energy............................. 1,722,407 1,255,393 1,928,259 +205,852 +672,866
Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................ 138,556 134,000 166,900 +28,344 +32,900
Nuclear energy..................................................... 961,665 853,644 803,000 -158,665 -50,644
(Reallocation from Energy supply and conservation)............. (682,877) ............... ............... (-682,877) ...............
(Reallocation from Nuclear nonproliferation)................... (278,789) ............... ............... (-278,789) ...............
Office of Legacy Management........................................ 33,872 ............... ............... -33,872 ...............
Clean coal technology:
Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2008............. 257,000 ............... ............... -257,000 ...............
Deferral of unobligated balances, fiscal year 2009............. -149,000 149,000 149,000 +298,000 ...............
Transfer to Fossil Energy R&D.................................. -164,489 -149,000 -149,000 +15,489 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Clean coal technology................................. -56,489 ............... ............... +56,489 ...............
Fossil Energy Research and Development............................. 578,349 605,030 727,730 +149,381 +122,700
Transfer from Clean Coal Technology............................ 164,489 149,000 149,000 -15,489 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Fossil Energy Research and Development............. 742,838 754,030 876,730 +133,892 +122,700
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves............................. 20,272 19,099 19,099 -1,173 ...............
Strategic petroleum reserve........................................ 186,757 344,000 205,000 +18,243 -139,000
Northeast home heating oil reserve................................. 12,335 9,800 9,800 -2,535 ...............
Energy Information Administration.................................. 95,460 110,595 110,595 +15,135 ...............
Non-defense environmental clean up................................. 182,263 213,411 269,411 +87,148 +56,000
Uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning fund........ 622,162 480,333 515,333 -106,829 +35,000
Science............................................................ 4,017,711 4,721,969 4,640,469 +622,758 -81,500
Nuclear Waste Disposal............................................. 187,269 247,371 195,390 +8,121 -51,981
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program....................... 5,450 19,880 19,880 +14,430 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... -991 -19,880 -19,880 -18,889 ...............
Proposed change in subsidy cost................................ ............... 355,000 355,000 +355,000 ...............
Advance appropriation (Public Law 110-161)..................... 42,000 ............... ............... -42,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Innovative Technology Guarantee Pgm................ 46,459 355,000 355,000 +308,541 ...............
Departmental administration........................................ 309,662 272,144 272,144 -37,518 ...............
Miscellaneous revenues......................................... -161,247 -117,317 -117,317 +43,930 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net appropriation............................................ 148,415 154,827 154,827 +6,412 ...............
Office of the Inspector General.................................... 46,057 51,927 51,927 +5,870 ...............
Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National Nuclear Security Administration:
Weapons activities............................................. 6,297,466 6,618,079 6,524,579 +227,113 -93,500
Defense nuclear nonproliferation............................... 1,657,996 1,247,048 1,909,056 +251,060 +662,008
Rescissions................................................ -322,000 ............... ............... +322,000 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, Defense nuclear nonproliferation............... 1,335,996 1,247,048 1,909,056 +573,060 +662,008
Naval reactors................................................. 774,686 828,054 828,054 +53,368 ...............
Office of the Administrator.................................... 402,137 404,081 404,081 +1,944 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration........... 8,810,285 9,097,262 9,665,770 +855,485 +568,508
Defense environmental cleanup...................................... 5,349,325 5,297,256 5,771,506 +422,181 +474,250
Other defense activities........................................... 754,359 1,313,461 827,503 +73,144 -485,958
Defense nuclear waste disposal..................................... 199,171 247,371 193,000 -6,171 -54,371
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities...................... 15,113,140 15,955,350 16,457,779 +1,344,639 +502,429
====================================================================================
Power Marketing Administrations
Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration....... 54,817 56,940 56,940 +2,123 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... -48,413 -49,520 -49,520 -1,107 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, O&M, Southeastern Power Administration............. 6,404 7,420 7,420 +1,016 ...............
Operation and maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration....... 65,165 63,414 63,414 -1,751 ...............
Offsetting collection.......................................... -35,000 -35,000 -35,000 ............... ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, O&M, Southwestern Power Administration............. 30,165 28,414 28,414 -1,751 ...............
Construction, rehabilitation, operation and maintenance, Western 541,546 524,830 624,830 +83,284 +100,000
Area Power Administration.........................................
Offsetting collection.......................................... -308,702 -328,118 -403,118 -94,416 -75,000
Offsetting collection Colorado River Dam Fund.................. -3,937 -3,366 -3,366 +571 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, O&M, Western Area Power Administration............. 228,907 193,346 218,346 -10,561 +25,000
Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund.................. 2,477 2,959 2,959 +482 ...............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Power Marketing Administrations....................... 267,953 232,139 257,139 -10,814 +25,000
====================================================================================
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Salaries and expenses.............................................. 260,425 273,400 273,400 +12,975 ...............
Revenues applied................................................... -260,425 -273,400 -273,400 -12,975 ...............
====================================================================================
Total, title III, Department of Energy....................... 24,489,102 25,892,888 27,016,658 +2,527,556 +1,123,770
Appropriations........................................... (24,661,102) (25,743,888) (26,867,658) (+2,206,556) (+1,123,770)
Rescissions.............................................. (-322,000) ............... ............... (+322,000) ...............
Deferrals................................................ (108,000) (149,000) (149,000) (+41,000) ...............
Advance appropriations................................... (42,000) ............... ............... (-42,000) ...............
====================================================================================
TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appalachian Regional Commission.................................... 73,032 65,000 85,000 +11,968 +20,000
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board............................ 21,909 25,499 25,499 +3,590 ...............
Delta Regional Authority........................................... 11,685 6,000 20,000 +8,315 +14,000
Denali Commission.................................................. 21,800 1,800 21,800 ............... +20,000
Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Salaries and expenses.......................................... 917,334 1,007,956 1,022,956 +105,622 +15,000
Revenues....................................................... -771,220 -847,357 -860,857 -89,637 -13,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 146,114 160,599 162,099 +15,985 +1,500
Office of Inspector General.................................... 8,744 9,044 9,344 +600 +300
Revenues....................................................... -7,870 -8,140 -8,410 -540 -270
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal..................................................... 874 904 934 +60 +30
====================================================================================
Total, Nuclear Regulatory Commission......................... 146,988 161,503 163,033 +16,045 +1,530
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board............................... 3,621 3,811 3,811 +190 ...............
Tennessee Valley Authority: Office of Inspector General............ ............... 17,000 ............... ............... -17,000
Offset......................................................... ............... -17,000 ............... ............... +17,000
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska natural gas 2,261 4,400 4,400 +2,139 ...............
transportation projects...........................................
====================================================================================
Total, title IV, Independent agencies........................ 281,296 268,013 323,543 +42,247 +55,530
====================================================================================
Grand total.................................................. 31,508,398 31,695,700 33,767,000 +2,258,602 +2,071,300
Appropriations........................................... (31,685,186) (31,721,700) (33,618,000) (+1,932,814) (+1,896,300)
Emergency appropriations................................. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
Rescissions.............................................. (-326,788) (-175,000) ............... (+326,788) (+175,000)
Deferrals................................................ (108,000) (149,000) (149,000) (+41,000) ...............
Advance appropriations................................... (42,000) ............... ............... (-42,000) ...............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------